Lync 2013 client is deployed but user accounts are not migrated from OCS to Lync 2013 Server - how to open Lync meetings automatically in the Lync Web Plug-in

We have in our enterprise the following scenario:
1 - Lync 2013 client is installed
2 - User accounts are not migrated to Lync 2013 Server, users are using Office Communicator as their main tool
3 - Users receive Lync 2013 meeting requests but when try to access them, Lync 2013 client launches and shows error. Users will need to open the browser and paste the URL to the address bar but this still open
4 - We cannot use the workaround of adding "?SL=1" to the Lync 2013 meeting URL as the user base is large and manual workaround is not accepted
5 - Question: is there any automated way, via egistry key or GPO setting, so that users temporarily (until their accounts are migrated to Lync 2013 server) can bypass Lync 2013 client completely and automatically open all Lync 2013 meetings
on the browser, using Lync Web Plug-in?

Thanks for the response,
First, I should have mentioned clearly that users have Office Communicator 2007 client and Lync 2013 client installed in their machines. Their accounts are not migrated yet to Lync 2013 server.
Second, we are using IE9 and IE10. The issue is that users CAN join Lync 2013 meetings with their browsers but have to paste the URL manually to browser and add "?SL=1" otherwise, if they just click at the "Join Online Meeting" or "Join
Lync Meeting" URL it launches Lync 2013 client which shows error because is not configured yet, as they are using OCS client and migrating slowly to Lync 2013 server.
Is there a Group Policy setting or a registry key from Microsoft that can be turned on to these users machines and make will all Lync meeting requests to be opened in IE browser instead of Lync 2013 client. We need a way to ignore
Lync 2013 client until user accounts are migrated to Lync 2013 Server. Manually typing URLs is not an option in a big organization, can't explain thousands of users of different levels what to do.
We are regretting the decision not to separate Lync 2013 from Office 2013 package we deployed recently. If Lync 2013 is uninstalled then all Lync meeting requests are opened in browser without an issue.

Similar Messages

  • OSD - MDT 2013 - USMT Scan/LoadState Runs Successfully but user profiles are not restored.

    I have this odd issue that I can't seem to figure out. I have an MDT Task Sequence that I created runs scanstate and loadstate without any issues using hard link. Unfortunately, the user profiles are not loaded/restored after loadstate runs. I can go to
    the StateStore folder and manually run the loadstate again or use the Windows Easy transfer to restore the users, but I want this to occur when loadstate runs. 
    Here is the loadstate log:
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] USMT Started at 2014/03/30:18:01:10.787
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Command line: C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\CMP0010E\x86\loadstate.exe C:\StateStore /c /v:5 /l:C:\WINDOWS\system32\CCM\Logs\SMSTSLog\loadstate.log /progress:C:\WINDOWS\system32\CCM\Logs\SMSTSLog\loadstateprogress.log
    /i:C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\CMP0010E\x86\MigApp.xml /i:C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\CMP0010E\x86\MigUser.xml /ue:*\* /ui:company.local\*
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Status                [0x000000] Activity: 'MIGACTIVITY_COMMAND_LINE_PROCESSING'
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Script file specified: C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\CMP0010E\x86\MigApp.xml[gle=0x000000cb]
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Script file specified: C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\CMP0010E\x86\MigUser.xml[gle=0x000000cb]
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Replacement Manifests are processed because this OS version has built-in component manifests
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] The ReplacementManifests folder used to service system component manifests is not present. OS settings migration will be done with system component manifests
    installed onto the system.
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Starting the migration process[gle=0x00000006]
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Status                [0x000000] Activity: 'MIGACTIVITY_MIGRATION_START'
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Excluding path: C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\CMP0010E\x86
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Excluding path: C:\StateStore
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Excluding path: C:\WINDOWS\system32\CCM\Logs\SMSTSLog\loadstate.log
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Excluding path: C:\WINDOWS\system32\CCM\Logs\SMSTSLog\loadstateprogress.log
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Excluding path: C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\CMP0010E\x86\MigApp.xml
    2014-03-30 18:01:10, Info                  [0x000000] Excluding path: C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\CMP0010E\x86\MigUser.xml
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x000000] Leaving MigCloseCurrentStore method
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Status                [0x000000] Activity: 'MIGACTIVITY_SUCCESS'
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x000000] Success.[gle=0x00000006]
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x000000] USMT Completed at 2014/03/30:18:02:55.116[gle=0x00000006]
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x000000] Entering MigShutdown method
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x080000] COutOfProcPluginFactory::FreeSurrogateHost: Shutdown in progress.
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x0803e6] Removing mapping for HKLM
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x0803e7] Successfully unmapped HKLM
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x0803e6] Removing mapping for HKU
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x0803e7] Successfully unmapped HKU
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x080487] Destroying OS analysis service
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x080488] Destroyed OS analysis service
    2014-03-30 18:02:55, Info                  [0x000000] Leaving MigShutdown method

    I've got this to work although I haven't figured out the root cause.
    My initial OSDMigrateAdditionalCaptureOptions were: /Hardlink /nocompress /uel:30 /config:%_SMSTSMDataPath%\Packages\%_OSDMigrateUsmtPackageID%\%Processor_Architecture%\config.xml"
    My OSDMigrateRestoreCaptureOptions were:  /Hardlink /nocompress /ue:*\* /ui:domain.local\*
    Since the restore was failing, I removed the domain name from the ui switch which magically caused the restore process to load the user profiles to the computer.
    My final OSDMigrateRestoreCapptureOptions which worked: /Hardlink /nocompress /ue:%computername%.
    Just to note /hardlink commands are not necessary when you are using MDT task sequence, but I put it in anyway and it seems ensure that I get consistent results.

  • In some site collections old user accounts are not replacing after stsadm migrateuser

    Hi,
       When running stsadm migrate user that actually not replacing the old account for some users in the site collection. Any idea please?

    I got the reason, I needed to run the migrate user command in concerned farm. As that was the consuming farm so I was under impression that I needed to run the command in the publishing farm only. But that is not the case.

  • After deleting users they are not removed from portal30.wwsec_person

    I am building a customized script to carry on users self registration.
    the script is going great and user is created and i can log into portal
    successfully with this new created user.
    I relogin as portal administrator and delete this new user and now if i tried
    to list portal users I cant see the user.
    But when I try to rerun my script to recreate this user again it fails when I
    investigated I found that it fails because the entry of this user is removed
    from portal30_sso.wwsec_person while it still exists in portal30.wwsec_person
    so the script fails as there is duplicate in primary key.
    Is this a bug in portal 309 that when the user is deleted it is not removed
    from portal30.wwsec_person

    This is actually a combination of intended behavior/design and a bug.
    Let me first explain why there is a user in both the PORTAL30_SSO schema as well as the PORTAL30 schema.
    The definition of the user, that can log in, and defines the single sign-on account, is the user's entry in the
    WWSEC_PERSON$ table in the PORTAL30_SSO schema. The SSO server actually just uses a subset of the
    columns in this table -- those defined in the WWSSO_SSO_USER view.
    The same table exists in the PORTAL30 schema, because there is a lot of common infrastructure code
    shared by both applications (Login Server, and Portal). The Security and Session Management code
    is common, and this code includes the dependency on the WWSEC_PERSON$ table.
    Now, assuming that the code was independent (for the sake of argument), why do we still have an entry
    for the user in both schemas? As I mentioned earlier, the user entry in the SSO schema is the "master".
    The SSO server can have multiple partner applications connected to it. Indeed, on my.oracle.com, the
    login server there has at least 4 portals hooked up to it, and a few other non-Portal partner applications,
    such as Oracle Mobile.
    Each partner application may have a local user profile that it uses to store application specific attributes
    of the user. This is stuff that the Login Server is not interested in, and could in no way predetermine for
    all conceivable partner applications. So, it is not unreasonable for each partner application to also have
    a user record which stores additional attributes of the user (not related to user authentication), and which
    can be used to reference other user-related data. For example in the Portal, all the user's privileges
    and group memberships are tied to the Portal's user record (foreign key constraints). So, the Portal
    being just one partner application of the Login Server, it adhere's to this model and has a user entry
    in it's schema corresponding to the user entry in the Login Server.
    When a user logs on and accesses a partner application for the first time, the partner application (read Portal)
    is expected to automatically create a local profile entry for the user on demand. The Portal does this.
    In 3.0.9 and previous versions, to delete a user, you need to delete the user in the Login Server AND the Portal.
    The only way to do this is to first delete the user in the Login Server, using the User Portlet.
    Then type the user's name into the Portal User Profile portlet (they won't be in the LOV anymore since
    you just deleted them from the login server), and click Edit, then Reset To Defaults (this means delete).
    You will then get a User Not Found error, since the page is trying to go back to show the details about this user.
    (All this has been fixed in 9.0.2 v2, by the way).

  • Automatic deletion of users who are not responsible from sending mail list.

    Hi ,
    i have designed a workflow where mail will be sent to 5 users. my requirement is mails should be  deleted automatically from users who are nor resposible . please guide me.
    Thanks and regards.
    kasturi

    Hi,
    i have designed a workflow where mail will be sent to 5 users.
    Are you picking the 5 User via coding, If yes you can restrict in the coding
    my requirement is mails should be deleted automatically from users who
    are nor resposible .
    You mean to say you want to Send Mail to the User's who receive the Workitem.
    If yes, you can achieve via Extended Notification.
    If No, can you please explain your requirement?
    Regards,
    Surjith

  • TS1718 The movies I have downloaded to my itunes account are not playing. When I try to play one, itunes quits working. i have watched the movies before without this happening. I wish I could actually talk to a live person at apple to help!

    I am having issues playing the movies I have downloaded onto my computer with ITunes. I have watched them before, but now ITunes shuts down whenever I try to watch one.

    Are you running iTunes 10.7.0.21? If so, try the following user tip:
    iTunes for Windows 10.7.0.21: "iTunes has stopped working" error messages when playing videos, video podcasts, movies and TV shows

  • G/L Accounts are not copied

    Hi Experts,
    I created a new company code and it is  copied from 1000.
    But the G/L Accounts are not copied from 1000 to new company code.
    i want to copy the existing G/L Accounts.
    Please guide me.
    Ramireddy

    Hi
    Although you would ask it in FI forums, have you used the tcode OBY2 without the test flag to copy GL acc. from one company to the other? Remember that in destiny company must not have any account,
    Regards
    Eduardo
    I copy the info from documentation in IMG:
    Copy Company Code
    In this activity you can copy G/L accounts from one company code to another.
    Requirements
    No G/L accounts may exist in the target company code.
    The chart of accounts for the target company code must be a copy of the source company code's chart of accounts.
    Note
    If no master data exists for G/L accounts in the chart of accounts area in the target company code, the system copies the master data from the source company code's chart of accounts.
    Activities
    Enter a target company code in the Company code field. In the Copy from company code field, enter the company code you want to copy.
    Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Oct 27, 2011 3:35 PM

  • Can't enroll device for user and this user account is not authorized to use Windows Intune.

    Hello,
    We have SCCM 2012 R2 inegrated with intune via an intune subscription. When I enroll a device with my admin account there are no problems, but when I want to add it with another user account which is a member of the Intune users collection, it can't be enrolled.
    When I tested on https://portal.manage.microsoft.com with the credentials of the user I couldn't connect and received the following error: This user account is not authorized to use Windows Intune.
    Do I have to do anything in the https://accounts.manage.microsoft.com as there is a checkbox saying Windows Intune. this is unchecked now for all the users even my own account on which I'm able to enroll a device.
    Or is this a license problem? I know configuration Manager uses licenses for Intune but where can we track how many licenses are used and how many available? Is there some kind of report available?
    I hope someone can help me
    Kind regards,
    Robben

    I added them yesterday and this morning I was still not able to enroll a device with the added user his credentials.
    The UPN is correct. Maybe I need to force the DirSync then? Or will one day of waiting be enough normally?
    I can see the user in the intune management portal. Does this means it has been synced?
    Another thing I noticed is the cloudusersync.log doesn't show them being added? What I was thinking is I first used the all Users collection in the subscription and afterwards I changed it to a specific collection with only the test users. Could it be that
    they all synced already and the log doesn't show them anymore?
    A warning in this log shows this also:
    WARNING: Failed to get lsu url. default release one will be used. exception = System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.~~   at Microsoft.ConfigurationManager.DmpConnector.UserSync.CloudUserUpload..ctor()  
     SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:18    7684 (0x1E04)
    I don't know if that has anything to do with this?
    this is an extract of that log:
    CCloudUserSync::Process - User sync processing thread is now stopping.    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 14:59:42    8144 (0x1FD0)
    SMS_EXECUTIVE started SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC as thread ID 7684 (0x1E04).    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:15    7572 (0x1D94)
    CCloudUserSync::Process - User sync processing has started.    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:15    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user sync ...    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:15    7684 (0x1E04)
    WARNING: Failed to get lsu url. default release one will be used. exception = System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.~~   at Microsoft.ConfigurationManager.DmpConnector.UserSync.CloudUserUpload..ctor()  
     SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:18    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user delta sync, raise failure status messages = True    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:18    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users from SCCM to be removed from cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Successfully removed users from cloud 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users to add from SCCM = 0, Total Successfully added users to Cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    UserDeltaSync:- Users Added = 0, Users Removed = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user delta sync, raise failure status messages = True    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:07:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users from SCCM to be removed from cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:07:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Successfully removed users from cloud 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:07:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users to add from SCCM = 0, Total Successfully added users to Cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:07:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    UserDeltaSync:- Users Added = 0, Users Removed = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:07:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user delta sync, raise failure status messages = True    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:12:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users from SCCM to be removed from cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:12:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Successfully removed users from cloud 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:12:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users to add from SCCM = 0, Total Successfully added users to Cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:12:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    UserDeltaSync:- Users Added = 0, Users Removed = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:12:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user delta sync, raise failure status messages = True    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:17:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users from SCCM to be removed from cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:17:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Successfully removed users from cloud 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:17:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users to add from SCCM = 0, Total Successfully added users to Cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:17:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    UserDeltaSync:- Users Added = 0, Users Removed = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:17:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user delta sync, raise failure status messages = True    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:22:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users from SCCM to be removed from cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:22:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Successfully removed users from cloud 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:22:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users to add from SCCM = 0, Total Successfully added users to Cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:22:20    7684 (0x1E04)
    UserDeltaSync:- Users Added = 0, Users Removed = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:22:20    7684 (0x1E04)
    kind regards,
    Robben

  • User settings migrated from Office 2007 to 2013 using OCT

    Does anyone know what user settings are retained after upgrading Office 2007 to 2013 using the OCT? I have set the checkbox to migrate user settings in the OCT but all of the user's pinned documents are not longer there after the upgrade. Is this normal?

    Microsoft doesn't support migrating directly from SharePoint 2007 to SharePoint 2013, likely part of your decision to use a third party tool.
    I'm not familiar with these error messages, I suspect they're from DocAve and not SharePoint.
    My suggestion is to contact AvePoint support. 
    Jason Warren
    @jaspnwarren
    jasonwarren.ca
    habaneroconsulting.com/Insights

  • The connection was denied because the user account is not authorized for remote login

    Using Terminal Server 2008 not able to get non administrator users to login to the remote desktop. Have tried from Windows server 2008 and from Windows servers 2003. Get error login in "The connection was denied because the user account is not authorized for remote login" from Windows Server 2008. Error "The requested session access is denied" from Windows Server 2000.

    Is that seriously the only way to do this? Doesn't this render the "Allow log on through Terminal Services" GP Setting useless?
    I would like to know this answer, as well.  I have created a new AD group for my assistant admins called "Domain Admins (limited)".  I have added this group to the GP setting "Allow log on through Terminal Services", but the
    assistant admins cannot log in through RDP.  It 'feels like' this is all I would need to do.
    Craig
    Found some good info
    here. There are really two things required for a user to connect to a server via RDP. You can configure one of them via Group Policy but not the other.
    1) Allow log on through Terminal Services can be configured through Group Policy, no problem.
    2) Permissions on the RDP-listener must also be granted.  If your user is a member of the local Administrators group or the local Remote Desktop Users group then this is handled.  If you are trying to utilize a new, custom group (as I am),
    then there isn't a way to do this via group policy (that I have found).
    EDIT: Found the answer.  I am creating a blog post to outline the steps.  They aren't hard, but they're not self-explanatory.  It deals with the Restricted Groups mentioned above, but it's still automate-able using Group Policy so that you
    don't have to touch each computer.  I think the above poster (Andrey Ganev) got it right, but
    I had trouble deciphering his instructions.
    Here is my blog post that walks through this entire process, step-by-step.

  • Creating a new user account and transferring files from old account

    I am now having more problems than I can handle with my Leopard installation...problems such as applications that refuse quit no matter what ~ even after attempting force quit them and/or attempting to "sudo kill -9 PID", and now that I am having problems with Adobe Lightroom not even being able to remain open on my user account for more than 10 seconds max before it crashes without provocation (yet runs fine on a troubleshooting account I created on the same machine), I would now like to create a new user account on my MacPro Leopard 10.5.6 and transfer my files from the previous (problematic) user account, but I've never done so in the past...
    Can someone give me a basic rundown of how to go about doing this as a means of troubleshooting my current sickly user account (and if you could also please let me know which files I should avoid restoring to the newly created user account so that I don't screw that one up as well, I would appreciate it)
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated... Thanks!

    While logged into the troubleshooting account (assuming that it's an admin account—if not create a new one and log into it), backup the bad account's folder, delete the bad account, selecting the save data option (which is stored in /Users/Deleted Users/ as a disk image), recreate the bad account using the same username/password combo, log out and back into the recreated original account. If the problem's solved, open the saved data dmg file in /Users/Deleted Users/, open the /Library/Preferences/ folder from the saved data, open the current /Users/restored account/Library/Preferences/ folder, and slowly copy plist files from the saved data folder to the current one that don't exist in it. Log out and back in to ensure there's no conflict and things still work correctly. Resolving conflicts or identifying corrupt plist files is a laborious process. Good luck.
    See http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=4703015 for more details on this process.

  • I have been charged 274.55 from 8-23-2013 - 8-26-2013. These are not my charges. I need to know how to get the charges reversed and put back on my account ASAP. Please confirm!

    I have been charged 274.55 from 8-23-2013 - 8-26-2013. These are not my charges. I need to know how to get the charges reversed and put back on my account ASAP. Please confirm!

    You can contact iTunes Support via this page (we are fellow users here on these forums) : http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/ - click on Contact iTunes Store Support on the right-hand side of the page, then Purchases, Billing & Redemption

  • Last Time Machine back-up is 45 days old and only of User Account files (not entire HD) and I must now reinstall Lion without being able to perform a new back-up. Will any new User Account files, since my last back-up, be lost when Lion reinstalls (via i

    My last Time Machine back-up is 45 days old and only of User Account files (not entire HD) and I must now reinstall Lion (via internet) without  performing a new back-up. Will any new User Account files, since my last back-up, be lost when Lion reinstalls ?

    Reinstalling OS X doesn't affect user data, provided nothing goes wrong. But it would be very unwise to assume that nothing will go wrong, especially if you're having (unspecified) system issues. You should try to back up all data before you reinstall or do anything else. There are ways to do that, even if you're unable to boot.
    If your backups include only user files, you won't be able to access them in Setup Assistant.

  • VMM Shared ISO error "User account does not have permission required to open attachment"

    I had this error once because the local service account was selected during installation of VMM.  I have reinstalled VMM with a Domain service account and the error went away.  However, the error is back. 
    "User account does not have permission required to open attachment '\\[servername]\VMMLibrary\server.ISO'. Error: 'General access denied error' (0x80070005). (Virtual machine ID GUID)"
    I tried to create this VM on Host1 and got the error. 
    I then went to Host2 and was able to create the VM while using the same ISO on the same VMM library that failed on the Host1. 
    Both hosts have agent 3.2.7634.0 and are both running Hyper-V Server 2012 R2.
    What is wrong with Host1 and how do I correct it?
    Thank you.

    This is a share configuration permissions issue.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee340124.aspx
    Brian Ehlert
    http://ITProctology.blogspot.com
    Learn. Apply. Repeat.

Maybe you are looking for