Macbook Pro Dual-Harddrive Setup

Hello. I have a 120 gig ssd in my main harddrive slot. This quickly filled up with space and I now want to install a large hdd in the optical drive slot. I would like to know the best way to transfer all of my large files to the hdd but still keep the ssd as the boot drive. I just want to move my documents, movies, downloads and music. Can I do this simply through migration assistant? I am running OSX 10.9 (Mavericks). Thanks in advance.

First, backup your SSD in case you inadvertently delete some files during this move process.
To move the files and folders simply drag them from the SSD to the HD and then deleted them from the SSD.
You can move most of your personal data to the HD from the SSD.  Create a second User folder on the HD into which you can put your Documents, Movies, Pictures, etc.  Do not move your entire User folder.  Some OS X updates will fail if they do not find your User folder on the system drive.
For moving your iTunes Music folder and iPhoto Library folder see http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/freeingspace.html
Then for Time Machine to backup both volumes:
 > System Preferences > Time Machine > Options… > Remove the offload HD name from the exclusions list.  Now both your SSD and your HD will be backed up onto your external Time Machine disk.

Similar Messages

  • Powermac G5 Dual Core 2.0 GHZ or Macbook Pro Dual Core 2.0 GHZ

    I have a Macbook Pro Dual Core 2.0 GHZ that currently has 1 GB of RAM in it. For the most part it runs fine, but I do come into problems with it sometimes while I'm doing video editing which is my main usage for my computer. I currently run Final Cut Studio 2. Would it be worth it to sell this computer and get a Powermac G5 Dual Core 2.0 GHZ or 2.3 GHZ and upgrade the RAM to 8 GB to help my video editing run smoother? The reason why I am considering this is because I would like a computer that would work better with my video editing at a cost that I can afford. I also would like to have a firewire 800 port for my external hard drives. I rarely use my internal hard drive, so that is no factor in my decision. Currently I cannot afford a new Mac Pro, but will be buying one in about a year. I'm just trying to decide if this would be a good switch for right now. Thanks for your help.
    Message was edited by: hb8788
    Message was edited by: hb8788

    Although I don't own a Mac Pro, rumor has it that they run video chores significantly more efficiently than do the last generation G5's. I bought my 2.3 GHz, w/the 7800 card, for $600, last November on eBay. The case wasn't cosmetically perfect (a rather nasty looking crimp on the front handle) but it has performed well running my video (EyeTV and recording) and academic (I teach math & Mathematica) needs. I picked-up extra memory (it now has 6 Gigs) pretty cheap (around $75, IIRC), from Kingston. I also took the advice of many here and got a WD 640GB HD that made a significant difference in both boot-time and opening applications. However, if you're going to get a new Mac Pro in a year, it's almost like throwing money away - the G5 will probably have its' depreciation rate decrease once the software vendors no longer continue supporting pre-Intel machines. That being said, my G5 is more than sufficient handling my present version of Mathematica - I don't think that paying $3000, or whatever it takes to get a new Mac Pro, would balance the marginal increase of utility I would get using Mathematica. If I were a video guru, I might feel differently. I thought I could give you a definitive yes, buy the G5, because I really love mine. Unless something happens, I plan on having it for at least a few years. At about $250/year, if one figures that I'll have owned it for a total of 3 years, that's less than 70¢/day. But I also value the opinions of many of the posters who have commented on the new machine's speed, compared to the 2.5 GHz Quad, say.

  • Macbook Pro + Dual 2.0 G5 -- what's the best setup?

    I just purchased a new macbook pro, and was considering incorporating it into my home studio setup which uses a Dual 2.0 (Power PC) G5. I've been hunting around for an answer to how to make the most of these two computers, and I'm getting pretty confused!
    I run mostly EWQL Symphonic Orchestra plugs, and would love to get faster performance, and more mileage out of them. I also use two monitors on the G5, and don't want to sacrifice the screen real estate and do everything on my 15" MB pro screen.
    So, what I'm wondering, is this: Is there a way to spread out the processing power of these two computers using EWQL SO, and still use my two G5 monitors (and the MB pro monitor)?
    Thank you for your expertise!
    --Dave

    Several possibilities.
    #1. The Mac Book Pro is likely more powerful in the CPU department, so you could load Logic on there along with your plug-ins. Then use the G5 as a replacement for a hardware synth (as an AU/VST host). It will work basically like a Muse Receptor. http://www.museresearch.com/
    #2. If you need the PCI slots for DSP cards and/or you prefer to mix the project on the G5, use the laptop as a replacement for a hardware synth. Install an AU and/or VST host application on laptop.
    Option 1 and 2 will require that both machines have a MIDI interface and compatible audio I/O. You would basically run MIDI out from the main machine to MIDI In on the AU/VST Host machine, and run audio back to the machine running Logic. RAX2 hosts AUs, http://plasq.com/rax
    Steinberg's V-Stack hosts VSTs, http://www.steinberg.net/29_1.html
    3. Keep an eye out for a Mac version of FX-Teleport which basically does what Apple's node technology does, but will work with 3rd party plug-ins. Right now I know it works on PC with VSTs. Hopefully their Mac version is coming soon and opens the door for Logic. http://www.fx-max.com/fxt/

  • Macbook pro, dual core or quad core?

    Hey guys Im getting an early college present and was wondering which Macbook I should look at. This will be my one and only computer while im in college. No photo editing or anything like that, maybe some video editing but it will be almost none. Will be used to surf the web and write documents. My question is should i get the dual core or quad core processor? Will it really matter for what i want it for? One thing I absolutely hate is lag! So the faster of the two the better.

    tony477g wrote:
    So if I went with the quadcore because you guys say it is faster than the 2.9 ghz dualcore. Would the difference be noticable between the 2.6 ghz and the 2.3 ghz? I noticed the 2.6 has 8 gb to the 4gb and 750gb to the 500 gb.
    Well, actually, only one guy said the quad core would be faster, but it is not clear why they said that. You said you were only going to use it "to surf the web and write documents." Well, guess what. You don't need a quad-core for that. You don't need a dual-core for that. I've surfed the web and written documents on my old single-core iPhone. Those tasks are just not that demanding.
    So unless there are more things you want to do that you haven't mentioned, there is just about no way it's worth paying for quad-core or a 2.6GHz processor if all you are going to do is surf the web and write documents.
    The quad-core is going to speed up operations that specifically benefit from parallel processing, like intensive editing of photo/audio/video, or bulk encoding of audio and video, or specific math apps, stuff like that. And most Mac users would not benefit from choosing the 2.6GHz over the 2.3GHz because the performance of so many common uses depends not only on the CPU speed, but actually on the overall balance of CPU, RAM, and disc. In other words, if you really have a legitimate application for 2.6GHz it usually means you must also install a great deal more RAM and also an SSD to avoid creating a bottleneck that holds back the CPU. But then you would have a machine that is massively overpowered and overpriced for surfing the web and writing documents.
    You could surf the web and write documents quite effectively on the least expensive MacBook that Apple sells. But since you do want to keep it throughout all of college, it is a good idea to buy something higher than the bottom of the line. For a Mac for very basic uses that should last four years, I would suggest:
    13-inch MacBook Air with 256GB SSD storage and 8GB RAM
    13-inch MacBook Pro with 500GB HD storage and 8GB RAM
    13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display with 256GB SSD storage and 8GB RAM
    (You didn't mention what your budget is)
    I suggested 13-inch because it's more portable than the 15-inch but more comfortable for 4 years than an 11-inch. I chose storage sizes that would be appropriate since you said you would do some video. And I chose 8GB RAM because 4GB may not be enough for 4 years, and also because insufficient RAM is often a bigger cause of lag than CPU or disk speed.
    If you have a limited amount of money, from this point on you'll need to justify why you would want a bigger screen, a faster CPU, or more cores given the two tasks you said you'd be doing most of the time. Because again, if you didn't actually need a Mac, you could write documents and surf the web on an iPad with the Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover and be done for $600.

  • Macbook Pro - Dual Cinema Displays?

    I know you can only have one dual-link 30" cinema display, but is it possible to dual-screen with two 20" or 23" cinema displays on a Macbook Pro with the built-in display disabled?

    You can use a Matrox DualHead2Go Digital Edition
    <http://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/gxm/products/dh2go/digital/home.php>
    The other option is a Magma ExpressBox
    <http://www.magma.com/products/pciexpress/expressbox1/index.html>
    with a NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT
    <http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/wa/RSLID?mco=C2 69DC41&nplm=MA567Z/A>

  • No rotate tool with the Macbook Pro dual screen

    I have hooked up a 2nd screen (22" monitor) to my Macbook pro (OS 10.6.6, 2.4 GHz i5, 4 gb rom) wanting to have the working graphics on the 22" monitor and the photoshop tools on the macbook. While in Photoshop CS5, I attempted to use the rotate tool on the 22" monitor but the program would not allow me to. The program stated that the Open GL needed to be turned on. I checked the file handling section of the preferences and the openGL was still on.
    What do I need to do to have the flexibility to rotate my image with the rotate tool on the connected monitor? 

    hi abbyt - Welcome to Apple Discussions!
    if you mean dual-boot btw OSX and WinXP - you sure can. apple provides Bootcamp for precisely this reason and it works very well...
    http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/
    if you mean dual-boot btw OSX and some kind of Linux - i have less experience there, but i think its possible. perhaps the easiest way is to use Parallels Workstation (but that's not really dual booting in fact - it's virtualization)...
    what "2nd" OS were you thinking about? cheers

  • Macbook Pro -- DUAL or TRIPLE MONITORS

    I have a macbook pro laptop
    Can I set up my system so my primary monitor is in landscape mode while the secondary displays in portrait mode? That would be very usefull for me.
    If the screen is closed.. then dual monitor is fine..
    -phillip

    AFAIK, you can rotate any display connected to the couputer as long as the video card supports display rotation (which includes all current Macs running 10.4.whatever). Each display you connect will represented by an icon in Display prefs. However, I don't see how you would connect more than one external display to a laptop that only has one external display port. I don't think there are any ExpressCard 34 DVI video cards that could be used to add another display so I would say that you are limited to one external display (I could be wrong on this but if such a device exists, I an not aware of it). If it were possible to connect more than one external, you should be able to rotate the display just like any other.

  • Macbook Pro dual Extended Monitors?

    I have a 2011 13 in macbook pro with the Thunderbolt port.  I would like to connect that mbp to two monitors with vga inputs that I currently own.  I want the screens to be extended, not mirrored.  What is the best way to accomplish this?
    Right now I'm thinkg, a Mini DVI to vga adpater connected to a VGA splitter.  But will that only result in mirrored images on the screens instead of an extended screen?

    AFAIK, you can rotate any display connected to the couputer as long as the video card supports display rotation (which includes all current Macs running 10.4.whatever). Each display you connect will represented by an icon in Display prefs. However, I don't see how you would connect more than one external display to a laptop that only has one external display port. I don't think there are any ExpressCard 34 DVI video cards that could be used to add another display so I would say that you are limited to one external display (I could be wrong on this but if such a device exists, I an not aware of it). If it were possible to connect more than one external, you should be able to rotate the display just like any other.

  • I can't use my Classic programs on new MacBook Pro Dual Core 1.83

    How do I get the MacBook Pro to recognize my Classic programs? I've got a number of Classic programs that worked fine on my G5 Power Mac running Tiger 10.4.4 but they won't run on Tiger 10.4.5 on the MacBook Pro. On my Power Mac it would just open up my Classic OS 9.2 and that would run the programs fine.
    What do I do?
    Thanks.

    Number 8,
    Most Apple resellers have a return policy that would take it back subject usually a restocking fee.
    I suggest contacting the store in question and let them know of your issue, and that you weren't aware of the limitation of the Intel Macs.
    There are still plenty of PowerPC Macs out there. I've written a FAQ about the Migration to Mac OS X here:
    http://www.macmaps.com/macosxnative.html
    Disclaimer: Reference to links I make to my Macmaps.com website are a for your information only type reference. I do not get any profit from this page, and it is open to the public.

  • How long does it take to boot up a desktop computer running a sata enclosed macbook pro removed harddrive?

    I've connected my Sata enclosed 250 gb MacBook pro hard drive that I had removed from my laptop to a school iMac. It's been almost 15 minutes since I selected the Orange hard drive that is mine from the list of available while holding option. Wondering how long to wait for this computer to boot up running my external hard drive before I give up or try again. There were two orange hard drives available when I connected my Sata, one of which was a backup....

    Well, as for the OS versions, it should work since the iMac is on ML and the external has Mavericks.
    I don't want to tell you that powering off will not corrupt anything as it could, so at this point, it'd be at your own risk. But, if it is not responding at all, there isn't much else you can do. If you power off, let it go for a couple of minutes and then try to boot into the iMac OS (unplug your external, then plug it back in after booting up); then go to System Preferences > Startup Disk > and try the external one more time.
    There is one other possibility I just thought of: you said it's a school iMac? Do they allow installs/booting from other sources or do they have them set up so you only have a regular user account (rather than an admin) which means you can't do any administrative stuff?

  • Two macbook pro computer sealing setup

    Ok my wife just called me. She has a 17"macbook pro and a student has a 15" macbook pro. They are in the same room. When the student boots her computer it comes up saying it is my wife's computer. when it tries to open office it says a copy already open. I told her to shut down airport and when she reboots it stills says it is my wife's computer.
    What is going on here? Which I was there.

    It would be helpful if you provided the OSX you are using and what if anything you may have tried to rectify the situation.
    You may look at this comprehensive trouble shooting guide for a start:
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3353
    Ciao.

  • MacBook Pro Dual 2 Core?

    Does anyone know when the new chip will be in the MacBook Pro?

    Yes...
    Apple knows when (and if) a new chip with be in the Macbook Pro - nobody else.
    You might also keep in mind that this is the Macbook forum. There is a separate Macbook Pro forum, on either of which we're not permitted to post rumors or product speculations. There are other sites like www.thinksecret.com for such questions.

  • 2 MacBook Pros - dual display???

    I have two MacBook Pros and want to keep all my files on one and connect the other to use as a second display. Can I do this?? If so, any ideas on how?

    luckylamb wrote:
    Somehow I kept thinking it would be a hardware issue, not a software one...
    Has to be done with software - the MBP does not have any sort of video input, so a VNC-like solution is the only option.

  • Macbook Pro: Dual Core i7 vs. Quad Core i7 for iMovie

    Hi-
    Debating whether to purchase the 13" MBP 2.8 GHz dual-core i7, or whether to pony up $700 more for the 15" MBP 2.4 GHz quad-core i7.  Another consideration would be whether to install 4 GB extra of RAM to get 8 GB at the cost of $180.
    Critical question here is whether video editing in iMovie would be OK with the dual-core i7 plus the extra RAM, or whether the quad-core is really necessary.  Anyone have some thoughts on this?  Thanks in advance.

    Ralph has pointed you in the right direction regarding RAM.  Both MBP'a will do the job, but I suspect the 15" machine will have the edge.  That aside, another consideration is the screen size it self.  Larger is better to put it simply.  I have 17" MBPs for that purpose.  That becomes a very big price jump, but I'm spoiled.
    Another factor to consider in working with video, is storage.  Video files can become very large.  Think about external storage and data flow for various types of connections.  Another advantage of the 17" MBP that it can accept and eSata connection (with an appropriate express card) where as the other MBPs cannot.  esata is significantly faster than Firewire, which in turn is faster than USB.  Naturally the enclosure will have to be eSata compatible.  Faster yet will be the Thunderbolt connection, but as of now I am not aware of any compatible enclosures.
    Ciao.

  • MacBook Pro, dual Monitor color shift with Photoshop CS4, OS 10.5.5

    I'm observing a strange behavior: With PS CS3 i could just drag an image from
    the laptop monitor to the external Eizo and the color would adjust instantly, with
    consistent color (All monitors calibrated, no settings have changed). The same applies to Lightroom
    2.0 too. Now when i do the same move with the same image opened in PS CS4 the color does not
    adjust to match but stays the same and the result is a oversaturated image on the external monitor.
    Any thoughts? Thanks, Mark

    It should adjust to the display the same as CS3.
    Have you tried turning off OpenGL image display?
    (it could be a bug, or a driver issue)

Maybe you are looking for