Mail 5.2(1257) pdf exceeds maximum size

When attaching a simple PDF (size 15.8MB) to a simple OS Lion email, when going out it expands to 21.4 MB. This exceeds my ISPs 20MB maximun file size. Any suggestion as to why a simple PDF would expand by almost 5 MB.
The same email without the attachment is only 400 KB.
Cheers

PDF is a binary file and as such must be encoded as text before it can be attached to an email. The encoding scheme, base64, adds a third to the size of the original file. What you are seeing is therefore normal and expected. If you want to send a large file to someone, consider putting it on an external server and sending them a link to it instead. There are many such cloud storage services available, many of them free.

Similar Messages

If Dimension exceeds maximum size then what will we do???

Hi Experts,
If Dimension exceeds maximum size then what will we do???
My dought was how to increase the dimension size in SSAS 2008 R2???
i am using SQL SERVER 2008 R2.
i had faced this question in one of the interview.so,Could you explain with an example.
Best Regards,
sirikumar

You can't exceed the maximum, else you get error. The maximum is a huge number:
Object
Maximum sizes/numbers
Databases in an instance
2^31-1 = 2,147,483,647
Dimensions in a database
2^31-1 = 2,147,483,647
Attributes in a dimension
2^31-1 = 2,147,483,647
Members in a dimension attribute
2^31-1 = 2,147,483,647
User-defined hierarchies in a dimension
2^31-1 = 2,147,483,647
Levels in a user-defined hierarchy
2^31-1 = 2,147,483,647
Cubes in a database
2^31-1 = 2,147,483,647
LINK:
Maximum Capacity Specifications (Analysis Services)
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
SELECT Video Tutorials 4 Hours
New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012

Error: Debug Component exceeds maximum size (65535 bytes)

Hi All,
It would seem that I have come across a limitation in the CAP file format for Java Card 2.2.1. When I run the Sun 2.2.1 converter I get the following output:
Converting oncard package
Java Card 2.2.1 Class File Converter, Version 1.3
Copyright 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms.
error: Debug Component exceeds maximum size (65535 bytes).
Cap file generation failed.
conversion completed with 1 errors and 0 warnings.This also happens with JCDK 2.2.2. Is there any way around this limitation? I can instruct the compiler to not generate some of the debug output such as variable attributes, but this makes the debugger less than useful. I could not find anything in the JCVM spec for JC2.2.1 that mentions this limitation (I could have missed it very easily if it is there). Is this a limitation that will be lifted in new versions of the standard? This is tarting to be a bit of a problem as our code base has outgrown our development tools (no more debugger). Compiling and running without debug information works fine.
Any information on this would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Shane

For those that are interested, I found this in the Java Card VM spec. u1 and u2 are 1 and 2 byte unsigned values respectively. It would appear that it is a limitation of the CAP file format. We have managed to work around this problem (parsing the debug component of the cap file was very informative) by shortening package names, reducing exception handling, and removing classes that we could do without.
It looks like this is removed for JC3.0 Connected Edition does not have this issue as it does not have CAP files, but JC2.2.2 and JC3.0 Classic Edition have this same issue. It would be nice if there was a converter/debugger combination that removed this limitation. If anyone knows of such a combination, I am all ears! I know for a fact that JCOP does not :(
Cheers,
Shane
*6.14 Debug Component*
This section specifies the format for the Debug Component. The Debug Component contains all the metadata necessary for debugging a package on a suitably instrumented Java Card virtual machine. It is not required for executing Java Card programs in a non-debug environment.
The Debug Component references the Class Component (Section 6.8 "Class Component), Method Component (Section 6.9 "Method Component), and Static Field Component (Section 6.10 "Static Field Component). No components reference the Debug Component.
The Debug Component is represented by the following structure:
{code}
debug_component {
u1 tag
u2 size
u2 string_count
utf8_info strings_table[string_count]
u2 package_name_index
u2 class_count
class_debug_info classes[class_count]
{code}
The items in the debug_component structure are defined as follows:
*tag* tag item has the value COMPONENT_Debug (12).
*size* The number of bytes in the component, excluding the tag and size items. The value of size must be greater than zero.

Notification when mails are blocked due to exceeding max size

Hi Folks,
Can you tell me if it is possible to configure Ironport so that when an email is blocked due to exceeding the maximum allowed size, the intended recipeint of the email is notified?
Thanks,
Darragh

Darragh,
that's not possible in the normal mail flow policy, as at the point the message exceeds the maximum size configured, the IronPort closes the connection with a soft bounce error, and the sending mailserver will generate the error message send to the sender. The only workaround to that would be to configure a greater mailsize in the mail flow policies, and later use a message or content filter with a message size condition. There you can configure a notification to be send to the recipient, and a bounce. If considering this please be aware that this workaround will use up performance from your appliance, as the large messages will be accepted first by the IronPort and then processed by the workqueue before bounced.
Regards,
Andreas

Bounce file exceeds maximum size. How to change CAF

I'm new at editing recordings. I only record my speaking engagements. They are rarely under one hour. When I tried to "share" to my iTunes, I got an error message that says
"The bounce file exceeds the maximum file size. Please change the format to CAF, or decrease the bounce range."
I have NO idea what that means, and NO idea where I would change the format. Could someone please enlighten me?
I really appreciate your volunteering your time to share this information!
ALSO: If I wanted to divide a recording into parts, how would one go about doing this? (maybe making 20 minute sections - and that would decrease the size of the file).
MANY thanks,
Lianda

When you are sharing to iTunes, try a different quality setting, not AIFF. A lower quality setting will give a smaller file size.
To export only a part of the song, enable "Export Cycle Region only" and then use the Cycle region (the yellow bar in the ruler), to mark the part of the song you want to share to iTunes.

Migration Errors: ORA-22973:maximum size allowed

I am trying to migrate old Content from Portal 3.0 to Oracle9i AS Portal? And am getting this error:
IMP-00017: following statement failed with ORACLE error 22973:
"CREATE TABLE "WWSEC_ENABLER_CONFIG_INFO$" OF "SEC_ENABLER_CONFIG_TYPE" OID "
"'89EE4E7F6D396812E034080020F05106' ( PRIMARY KEY ("LS_LOGIN_URL")) OBJECT "
"ID PRIMARY KEY PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 LOGGING STORAG"
"E(INITIAL 131072 NEXT 131072 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 4096 PCTINCREASE 0 FRE"
"ELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "USERS""
IMP-00003: ORACLE error 22973 encountered
ORA-22973: size of object identifier exceeds maximum size allowed.
Back in Febuary I have seen posts (Jay and Rich's) that there were some solutions coming down the pike. Are there any solutions or what can be done to solve the error of maximum size allowance?

What I did was upgrade the initial portal instance with Portal 3.0.6 with the upgrade scripts first. Then import over to a new instance of 3.0.9 with your old content or data. Then, reran the sso_schema script for rebuilding connectivity to the log-in server.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Carol Kuczborski ([email protected]):
I just encountered the same exact error trying to export a database from one one machine to another. It looks like all the other portal tables imported OK.
Have you found a resolution or does anyone know how to successully create the wwsec_enabler_config_info$ table?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

The following files weren't attached because adding them would cause the message to exceed the maximum size limit of 10 MB

Dear sir/madam
I installed exchange server 2013
my clients want to attache more than 10 MB
when they attache more than 10 MB they got this massage "The following files weren't attached because adding them would cause the message to exceed the maximum size limit of 10 MB"
so how can you help me to increase the attachment size and the way to do that
how can I change the default 10 MB
Please can you help me as soon as
Rawa Zangana

Hi Rawa,
You can use EAC or EMS to set the MaxSendSize. The default value of MaxSendSize is 10 MB.
If you use EAC, here is the steps:
Logon to EAC -> Mail flow -> Receive connectors -> settings-> type the Maximum send message size you want to set
If you use EMS, please use the cmdlet Rajith provided.
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

552 Message size exceeds maximum message size

[Dell Inspiron 560 desktop;
MS Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64bit; Windows Live Mail 2011; MS Word Pro 2003; Mozilla Firefox 22.0; Adobe FP 11,8,800,94; Adobe Reader 11.......]
Hello, I have the same problem, 10 emails I sent out bounced with the following same error message:
">>>xxxxxxxxxatxxxxxxxx.co.il(reading confirmation): 552 Message size exceeds maximum message size"
And they also sent the headers....which is all Greek to me. Being a very beginner computer user, I can't execute the good advice given here.
This is very strange since the emails so bounced only had 5 small pictures I had taken in my small, cheap dig camera, while other messages I had sent out
successfully before were probably 4 times as big.
Also, whose fault is it: my server RCN? Microsoft? I wonder...
I hope there's something easier for me to do to fix this problem?
Thanks ever so much for any help! :) Adela

It says to me that the message you sent was rejected along the way because it was too big. Ask the e-mail administrator of the system that's bouncing it.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

ORA-01044: size of buffer bound to variable exceeds maximum

Hello Oracle Gurus,
I have a tricky problem.
I have a stored procedure which has to retun more than 100,000 records. In my stored procedure, I have "TABLE OF VARCHAR2(512) INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER". It fails when I try to get 80,000 records.
I get an error "ORA-01044: size 40960000 of buffer bound to variable exceeds maximum 33554432"
A simple calculation shows that 512*80000=40960000.
Oracle help suggests to reduce buffer size (i.e., number of records being returned or size of variable).
But, reducing the number of records returned or reducing the size of variable is not possible because of our product design constraints.
Are there any other options like changing some database startup parameters to solve this problem?
Thanks,
Sridhar

We are migrating an application running on Oracle 8i to 9i and found the same problem with some of the stored procedures.
Our setup:
+ Oracle 9.2.0.3.0
+ VB6 Application using OLEDB for Oracle ...
+ MDAC 2.8 msdaora.dll - 2.80.1022.0 (srv03_rtm.030324-2048)
I am calling a stored procedure from VB like this one:
{? = call trev.p_planung.GET_ALL_KONTEN(?,?,{resultset 3611, l_konto_id, l_name,l_ro_id, l_beschreibung, l_typ, l_plg_id})}
If setting the parameter "resultset" beyond a certain limit, I will eventually get this ORA-01044 error. This even happens, if the returned number of records is smaller than what supplied in the resultset parameter (I manually set the "resultset" param in the stored procedure string). E.g.:
resultset = 1000 -> ORA-06513: PL/SQL: Index der PL/SQL-Tabelle ungÃ¼ltig fÃ¼r Language-Array vom Host
resultset = 2000 -> OK (actual return: 1043 Recordsets)
resultset = 3000 -> ORA-01044: GrÃ¶Ãe 6000000 des Puffers fÃ¼r Variable Ã¼berschreitet HÃ¶chstwert von 4194304
resultset = 3500 -> ORA-01044: GrÃ¶Ãe 7000000 des Puffers fÃ¼r Variable Ã¼berschreitet HÃ¶chstwert von 4194304
... therefore one record is calculated here 7000000/3500=2000 bytes.
In Oracle 8i we never had this problem. As this is a huge application using a lot stored procedures, changing all "select" stored procedures to "get data by chunks" (suggestet in some forum threads in OTN) ist not an option.
Interesting: I can call the stored procedure above with the same parameters as given in VB from e.g. Quest SQL Navigator or sql plus successfully and retrieve all data!
Is there any other known solution to this problem in Oracle 9i? Is it possible to increase the maximum buffer size (Oracle documentation: ORA-01044 ... Action: Reduce the buffer size.)? What buffer size is meant here - which part in the communication chain supplies this buffer?
Any help highly appreciated!
Sincerely,
Sven Bombach

Exchange 2013 with Outlook 2013 - Not getting pop-up or mail tips for attachments exceeding max size

Our environment is Exchange Server 2013 CU3 and Outlook 2013 in cached mode. We have a transport rule that sets the max attachment size to 20 mb.
If someone sends an attachment larger than 20 mb they receive an NDR letting them know the message wasn't delivered because it exceeded the max attachment size. We would like for the user to be prevented from sending the message at all or to at least
get a mail tip before they try to send the message. The Outlook pop-up message that says "The file you're attaching is bigger than the server allows. Try putting the file in a shared location ..." isn't being generated for us. Not sure if that's
because we're running Exchange or not. If that pop-up isn't going to work it would be nice if the user could at least get a mail-tip warning them that the attachment exceeds the limit. But it doesn't look likes there's a mail-tip for attachment size, only
for message size. And, I've found that the message size mail-tip only works if the limit is set on the user. It doesn't seem to work if the limit is set via a transport rule.
Has anyone else gotten Outlook to present the pop-up or a mail-tip when exceeding attachment size? Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks but I performed all of those trouble shooting prior to posting to the forum. But, I have found the answer!
After referring to this article;
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124345(v=exchg.150).aspx
I removed the 10mb default limits from the organization config and chose to set the attachment and message size limits in our environment via transport
rules instead. That is the only way you can actually set an attachment size limit.
I had read this article several times searching for an answer;
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2813269#appliesto
The key is here;
"If you are using an Exchange Server account, the 20-MB attachment
limit for Internet email accounts is not used by Outlook 2013. Instead, Outlook uses the limit that is configured on your Exchange server. To modify the setting that is used to control the size of a message that is sent through an
Exchange Server account, follow these steps."
The steps that follow are for Exchange 2010 but they show setting organization limits not server limits. And note that it
says the size of a message, not the size of an attachment. Since mail-tips for message size are not displayed when the limit is set via the transport rules I thought it
was possible that the same inconsistency might apply to the attachment pop-up warning. I set the organization limits and voila! The pop-up now displays when an attachment that exceeds the message size limit is added to a message.
This is exactly what I wanted. Now users won't fill up their sent items trying to send large attachments that just bounce anyway.
It would be wonderful if Microsoft would provide information about what features of Outlook are affected when you apply message size limits at the
various levels.

ALBPM 6.0 : The maximum size for file uploads has been exceeded.

Hi,
I use AquaLogic BPM Entreprise server to deploy my Process. When I try to publish a process on my server I get the following error:
An unexpected error ocurred.
The error's technical description is:
"javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: null"
Possible causes are:
The maximum size for file uploads has been exceeded.
If you are trying to publish an exported project you should publish it using the remote project option.
If you are trying to upload the participant's photo you should choose a smaller one.
An internal error has ocurred, please contact support attaching this page's source code.
Has someone resolve it?
Thank's.

Hi,
Sure you've figured this out by now, but when you get the "Maximum size for file uploads" error during publish consider:
1. if your export project file is over 10mb, use "Remote Project" (instead of "Exported Project") as the publication source. That way when you select the remote project, you will point to ".fpr" directory of the project you are trying to publish.
Most times your project is not on a network drive that the server has access to. If this is the case, upload the .exp file to the machine where the Process Administrator is running, then expand it in any directory (just unzip the file). Then, from the Process Administrator, use the option to publish a Remote Project by entering the path to the .fpr directory you just created when unzipping the project.
2. Check to see if you have cataloged any jars and marked them as non-versionable. Most of the times the project size is big just because of the external jar files. So as a best practice, when you do a project export select the option "include only-versionable jars", that will get reduce the project size considerably (usually to Kb's). Of course you have to manually copy the Jar files to your Ext folder.
hth,
Dan

The maximum size of an SQL statement has been exceeded.

In ST22, abap dump shows that one of the possible reason was "The maximum size of an SQL statement has been exceeded."
How can I know what's the maximum size and how to compute that size had been reached?
Is this shown anywhere in the log?

1. decalre temp_key as a table.
2. use this package size option ....this gets the data in bite-sized chunks
SELECT MATKL MATNR MEINS
INTO corresponding fields of table TEMP_KEY package size 1000
FROM MARA
WHERE MATNR IN SO_MATNR.
loop at temp_key.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING TEMP_KEY TO ITAB_KEY1.
IF WS_PCHR SPACE.
CLEAR ITAB_CHAR.
CLEAR ITAB_KEY1-CHARACTER. REFRESH ITAB_KEY1-CHARACTER.
PERFORM GET_CHAR TABLES ITAB_CHAR ITAB_KEY1-CHARACTER
USING ITAB_KEY1-MATNR.
ENDIF.
APPEND ITAB_KEY1. CLEAR ITAB_KEY1.
endloop.
ENDSELECT.

DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_RSQL The maximum size of an SQL statement was exceeded

Dear,
I would appreciate a helping hand
I have a problem with a dump I could not find any note that I can help solve the problem.
A dump is appearing at various consultants which indicates the following.
>>> SELECT * FROM KNA1                     "client specified
559                  APPENDING TABLE IKNA1
560                  UP TO RSEUMOD-TBMAXSEL ROWS BYPASSING BUFFER
ST22
What happened?
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "/1BCDWB/DBKNA1" had to be terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
Error analysis
    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB', was not caught
     and
    therefore caused a runtime error.
    The reason for the exception is:
    The SQL statement generated from the SAP Open SQL statement violates a
    restriction imposed by the underlying database system of the ABAP
    system.
    Possible error causes:
     o The maximum size of an SQL statement was exceeded.
     o The statement contains too many input variables.
     o The input data requires more space than is available.
     o ...
    You can generally find details in the system log (SM21) and in the
    developer trace of the relevant work process (ST11).
    In the case of an error, current restrictions are frequently displayed
    in the developer trace.
SQL sentence
550     if not %_l_lines is initial.
551       %_TAB2[] = %_tab2_field[].
552     endif.
553   endif.
554 ENDIF.
555 CASE ACTION.
556   WHEN 'ANZE'.
557 try.
>>> SELECT * FROM KNA1                     "client specified
559                  APPENDING TABLE IKNA1
560                  UP TO RSEUMOD-TBMAXSEL ROWS BYPASSING BUFFER
561    WHERE KUNNR IN I1
562    AND   NAME1 IN I2
563    AND   ANRED IN I3
564    AND   ERDAT IN I4
565    AND   ERNAM IN I5
566    AND   KTOKD IN I6
567    AND   STCD1 IN I7
568    AND   VBUND IN I8
569    AND   J_3GETYP IN I9
570    AND   J_3GAGDUMI IN I10
571    AND   KOKRS IN I11.
572
573   CATCH CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SEMANTICS INTO xref.
574     IF xref->kernel_errid = 'SAPSQL_ESCAPE_WITH_POOLTABLE'.
575       message i412(mo).
576       exit.
577     ELSE.
wp trace:
D *** ERROR => dySaveDataBindingValue: Abap-Field= >TEXT-SYS< not found [dypbdatab.c 510]
D *** ERROR => dySaveDataBindingEntry: dySaveDataBindingValue() Rc=-1 Reference= >TEXT-SYS< [dypbdatab.c 430]
D *** ERROR => dySaveDataBinding: dySaveDataBindingEntry() Rc= -1 Reference=>TEXT-SYS< [dypbdatab.c 137]
Y *** ERROR => dyPbSaveDataBindingForField: dySaveDataBinding() Rc= 1 [dypropbag.c 641]
Y *** ERROR => ... Dynpro-Field= >DISPLAY_SY_SUBRC_TEXT< [dypropbag.c 642]
Y *** ERROR => ... Dynpro= >SAPLSTPDA_CARRIER< >0700< [dypropbag.c 643]
D *** ERROR => dySaveDataBindingValue: Abap-Field= >TEXT-SYS< not found [dypbdatab.c 510]
D *** ERROR => dySaveDataBindingEntry: dySaveDataBindingValue() Rc=-1 Reference= >TEXT-SYS< [dypbdatab.c 430]
D *** ERROR => dySaveDataBinding: dySaveDataBindingEntry() Rc= -1 Reference=>TEXT-SYS< [dypbdatab.c 137]
Y *** ERROR => dyPbSaveDataBindingForField: dySaveDataBinding() Rc= 1 [dypropbag.c 641]
Y *** ERROR => ... Dynpro-Field= >DISPLAY_FREE_VAR_TEXT< [dypropbag.c 642]
Y *** ERROR => ... Dynpro= >SAPLSTPDA_CARRIER< >0700< [dypropbag.c 643]
I thank you in advance
If you require other information please request

Hi,
Under certain conditions, an Open SQL statement with range tables can be reformulated into a FOR ALL ENTRIES statement:
    DESCRIBE TABLE range_tab LINES lines.
    IF lines EQ 0.
      [SELECT for blank range_tab]
    ELSE.
      SELECT .. FOR ALL ENTRIES IN range_tab ..
      WHERE .. f EQ range_tab-LOW ...
      ENDSELECT.
    ENDF.
Since FOR ALL ENTRIES statements are automatically converted in accordance with the database restrictions, this solution is always met by means of a choice if the following requirements are fulfilled:
1. The statement operates on transparent tables, on database views or on a projection view on a transparent table.
2. The requirement on the range table is not negated. Moreover, the range table only contains entries with range_tab-SIGN = 'I'
and only one value ever occurs in the field range_tab OPTION.
This value is then used as an operator with operand range_tab-LOW or range_tab-HIGH.In the above example, case 'EQ range_tab-LOW' was the typical case.
3. Duplicates are removed from the result by FOR ALL ENTRIES.This must not falsify the desired result, that is, the previous Open SQL statement can be written as SELECT DISTINCT.
For the reformulation, if the range table is empty it must be handled in a different way:with FOR ALL ENTRIES, all the records would be selected here while this applies for the original query only if the WHERE clause consisted of the 'f IN range_tab' condition.
FOR ALL ENTRIES should also be used if the Open SQL statement contains several range tables.Then (probably) the most extensive of the range tables which fill the second condition is chosen as a FOR ALL ENTRIES table.
OR
What you could do in your code is,
prior to querying;
since your select options parameter is ultimately an internal range table,
1. split the select-option values into a group of say 3000 based on your limit,
2. run your query against each chunck of 3000 parameters,
3. then put together the results of each chunk.
For further reading, you might want to have a look at the Note# 13607 as the first suggestion is what I read from the note.

TS3276 What's the maximum size of an email to be sent by Apple's Mail program?

What is the maximum size of an email sent in the Apple Mail program? Is 2.9 MB too large?

susanzimm wrote:
Is 2.9 MB too large?
No, in terms of Mail.app. As WZZZ said, this limit is set by your ISP.
Yes, in terms of netiquette. Google it. Any file > 1MB is, IMHO, too big for e-mail. Nowadays, this rule may be more relaxed, because more people have broadband. You should check with your intended recipient.

"ORA-01144: File size (7680000 blocks) exceeds maximum of 4194303 blocks.

Hi Team,
While increasing the tablespace i am getting below error. How to handle this any one please suggest.
SQL> set lin 300
SQL> col TABLESPACE_NAME for a25
SQL> col FILE_NAME for a65
SQL> select TABLESPACE_NAME,FILE_ID,FILE_NAME,AUTOEXTENSIBLE,sum(BYTES/1024/1024) MB
2 from dba_data_files where TABLESPACE_NAME='SYSAUX' group by TABLESPACE_NAME,FILE_ID,FILE_NAME,AUTOEXTENSIBLE order by sum(BYTES/1024/1024) DESC,file_name;
TABLESPACE_NAME FILE_ID FILE_NAME AUT MB
SYSAUX 3 /ora2/oradata/dbname/sysaux_01.dbf NO 300
SQL> Alter database datafile 3 RESIZE 60000M;
Alter database datafile 3 RESIZE 60000M
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01144: File size (7680000 blocks) exceeds maximum of 4194303 blocks
Regards,

941829 wrote:
Hi Team,
While increasing the tablespace i am getting below error. How to handle this any one please suggest.
SQL> set lin 300
SQL> col TABLESPACE_NAME for a25
SQL> col FILE_NAME for a65
SQL> select TABLESPACE_NAME,FILE_ID,FILE_NAME,AUTOEXTENSIBLE,sum(BYTES/1024/1024) MB
2 from dba_data_files where TABLESPACE_NAME='SYSAUX' group by TABLESPACE_NAME,FILE_ID,FILE_NAME,AUTOEXTENSIBLE order by sum(BYTES/1024/1024) DESC,file_name;
TABLESPACE_NAME FILE_ID FILE_NAME AUT MB
SYSAUX 3 /ora2/oradata/dbname/sysaux_01.dbf NO 300
SQL> Alter database datafile 3 RESIZE 60000M;
Alter database datafile 3 RESIZE 60000M
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01144: File size (7680000 blocks) exceeds maximum of 4194303 blocks
Regards,You must know that its really important to mention your db version and other details so that we can answer in a more proper manner. Since you haven't mentioned your db size and block size so here is a generic reply. If you are using 8kb Blocksize,you should be able to go till 32gb of one file(8192*4194303/1024/1024=>32G). So your solution would be to either go for a different file or use Big File(if you are on 10g and above) .
HTH
Aman....

Mail 5.2(1257) pdf exceeds maximum size

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for