Making layering order dynamic--possible (?)

hey-
I'm doing a project where six objects are all sitting on the canvas-I enlarge by increasing the scale of each one to cover the full screen. And that works fine with the top object(object-1) in the layer-but as I move down the layer list, object-2, when enlarged still has object-1 on top of it. I started to just manually keyframe the opacity down to zero and try to time it correctly, but by object-4, its seeming like there must be a better way.
My original hope was that I could just zoom into the canvas, so that each object would become full-screen, but I havent figured that out either.
help!
-eric
imac G5 Mac OS X (10.4.8)

i dont know how to delete the post--because im basically an idiot---I just put all of my folders into one main folder for the project--and am just keyframing the scale and position for that project folder, which creates the original desired effect I was going for of just zooming on the canvas--and I dont have to worry about layer order or anything.

Similar Messages

Error while Making Sales order Ref. to quaotion by increasing Qty.

Hi,
We are making quaotation for customer for qty 1 pcs, and after that ref. to that quotaion we are making Sales order and in sales order we are increasing the qty. as per customer PO means if we amke Quatation for 1 qty we are making Sales order for 3 qty but system is giving error that Quation qty. is less than sales orser qty. Difflict qty. 3 no to 1 no.
this error we are getting now previous we were working on same scenario and it was working fine so where is the meaasge setting for this.
regards,
zafar

Hi,
The message for yours is V1494
The message V1494 is hard-coded as Warning and Information message in the includes
FV45PF0V_VBAP-ZMENG_PRUEFEN_VO and FV45EF0V_VBEP-WMENG_PRUEFEN_VO. Therefore it is not possible to set them as Error message in Customizing. The only option you have is to MODIFY the standard Code to get an ERROR message.
All the V1 Error Messages are Standard Messages and not able to change in Customizing.
regards,
santosh

"Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse"

When I try posting GR with mvmt type 101 wrt PO I am receiving the error “Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse”
The scenario is storage lcation is maintained with the external warehouse management .
Is there anything i need to maintain warehouse as decentralised one or should i need to maintain any moment types or is there anything else i should maintain in the customisation.
Kindly guide me regarding this as I am new to WM ,Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
In my case i have not maintained as decentralised one.
also the thing is there is no warehouse house data managed over here .the requirement is when connected to extended warehouse the system has to create inspection lot after the GR has done ,
whereas in normal scenario everything is normal,
can you please suggest what should be done in this case.
Also if possible can you please tell me what from the scratch so that it will be helpful to come through .

To avoid Duplicate material entry while making sales order by VA01

Sir / Madam,
While making sales order by VA01 , duplicate material also accepted by system .There should be no duplicate material in sales order list.
please suggest solution.
Thanks.

Hi,
You should use userexit USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in MV45AFZZ and not USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT,.The reason behind this is prepare userexit is activated just before saving the document,so at the time of saving if the logic which you will give is not satisfied then you can set warning or error in the code.
Rewards points if useful.
Regads,
Amrish Purohit
Message was edited by:
AMRISH PUROHIT

Asking for purchasing reqistioner no. while making production order

dear all
asking for purchasing reqistioner no. while making production order.how do get rid of this reqisitioner no. option from production order.
regards
manish sharma

Hi,
Chcek the BOM copied to the order or the items that you are entering while creating the order, if item categories are N, purchse requisitions are automatically created and related info is queried from the user. Change item categories to L, stock items if external procurement is not relevant.

Making MySQL ORDER BY link dynamic in URL

I would like to have a dynamic table sorted by a dynamic URL.
I have found this script but I am not sure where I am meant
to put the DECLARE?
This is the MySql recordset:
BEGIN
DECLARE @SortOrder tinyint
SET @SortOrder = 2
SELECT *
FROM products
WHERE `Section` = colname OR `Department` = colname2
ORDER BY CASE WHEN @SortOrder = 1 THEN Code
WHEN @SortOrder = 2 THEN Name
ELSE Order
END
I get an error saying this:
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that
corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to
use near 'DECLARE @SortOrder tinyint SET @SortOrder = 2 SELECT *
FROM products WHERE `Sec' at line 2
Any ideas? And in the script what does the number 2 in this [
SET @SortOrder = 2 ] refer to? Two CASES?

I don't know for sure, but one thing I see is that you are using an alias which has the same name as the column:
DATE_FORMAT(date_created, '%m/%d/%Y %l:%i %p') AS 'date_created',
Then the order by clause is using that same column/alias. Maybe this is confusing MySQL? If MySQL supports alias's based on functions in the order by clause, you might want to change that alias name to something else, like date_created_alias and use that in the order by.
Otherwise, try using the complete function in the order by clause:
ORDER BY DATE_FORMAT(date_created, '%m/%d/%Y %l:%i %p') DESC
But in any case, it sure seems like it should be sorting correctly the way you are currently handling it.

Making an order payment using SecurePay and Paypal Standard gateway by API call-Order_PaymentProcess

PART_1
==================================
Hi,
I'm working at third party system which by API communicate with BC and in short:
1) create an order with specified products for specific customer) etc. at BC account ofcourse (works fine)
2) Make the payment using one of the payment gateway (defined in BC Payment gateway section)
a) SecurePay, or (works fine)
b) Paypal Website Standard (problem)
I found a litttle problem in API call to make the payment using paypal website standard (to be presice in case of Paypal option actually the user should be moved to the paypal website so the system should generate some link i think which will have some data which identify payment for specific order). I tried to use the Order_PaymentProcess (https://worldsecuresystems.com/catalystwebservice/catalystcrmwebservice.asmx?op=Order_Paym entProcess)
call but it looks it can't be done?
Please note the payment with this call using credit card details cause successfully use the SecurePay Payment gateway. Is here anyway who know the trick how to force (and what parameter should be used) to
make the payment using Paypal Website Standard?
And Yes I tried to obtain some additional documentation from BC support but without success (They said they are working at the new version of it... about 2 years ago they said they probably will prepare more detailed documentation ).
==================================
PART_2
In case if there is no possible to use the API call to force using the Paypal Website Standard is there any workaround of this?
I mean is it possible to move the user to the paypal site but in post data set some value which can be handled directly by the BC after making the payment at paypal site, so the BC then could for specific order automatically register this operation after paypal send the successfull payment notification?
==================================
PART_3
The third part is the question how to force by API call BC to send the invoice to the customer after the order will be created (and before making the payment).
The invoice is actually created only when the Order_PaymentProcess call will be finished with success (and the option "emailInvoiceToCustomer" will be set to true).
Is there any way to do that?
==================================
When You will answer please set note of what part is that answer.
Thanks for advice!

Dude, I don't know what you're saying. There's too much text and too much code, and the code is unformatted. When you post code, please use[code] and [/code] tags as described in Formatting tips on the message entry page. It makes it much easier to read.
However, based on the subject of your post, there's one thing I can say: If your key's state changes in a way that can affect the value of its hashcode, then you'll have to remove and re-add that key/value pair. Since the hashcode determines which subset the HashMap searches though to find your key, if your key doesn't have the same hashCode it has when you put it into the map, then the map will search the wrong bucket for your key.
If that doesn't help, please try to provide more concise, formatted code and a more concise explanation of the problem.

MRS: Multi Resource Sched: Scheduling at Order Level possible

Hi,
is it possible in MRSS 610 to create assignments by drag and dropping the order (not the operations seperately) to the planning board? Is there any customizing? For example the order is drag and droped to a resource and all the operations are assigned to this resource.
Thanks.

Hi Mark,
Well I assumed that you have confirmations integration active !! But I guess not because you say that the status is not integrated always.
What you need to do:
1) I assume you have SP05 or later.
2) Implement the user exit: CONFPM05. In the implementation of this exit you need to call FM: /MRSS/RSG_PM_ORDER_CONFIRM
3) Go to customizing: Basic Settings --> Assign ERP Objects --> Status
-- Here, define an abstract status (MRS Status) for confirmed and partially confirmed
-- map it to R3 status CNF and PCNF.
After this, whenever you enter confirmation for PM order from transaction IW41, the status will be integrated.
Now you can use the MRS statuses defined in step 3 to configure the colors.
Implementing the user exit CONFPM05 might require some technical input. But it is easy. Just a few double clicks and copy paste.
Contact an ABAP developer for the same.
This should solve your issue.
Regards
Varun

Error while making Production Order

Hello,
While I am trying to make production order for one material it is giving an error " Date lies outside the valid factory calendar" even for 1 kg. For other materials the error is not coming, both have the same work centre's.
Please guide me what can be the possible reasons?
Regards,
Naren Bora

Hi,
I hope u are creating the production order at CO01.
Before that check scheduling results at ca03 for order Material.
Regards
Pradeep

Third Party Order - Not possible to determine a consumption account

Hi All,
I know there are a number of threads on this subject but the answer for me doesn't seem to be here.
The scenario I am trying to configure is around buying and selling software licenses using a Third Party Sales Order process (Item Cat TAS).
My material is set up as a DIEN with and Account Assignment Group of BANS and a Valuation Class of 3200 (service). I'm assuming that as the license key is a notional concept rather than a physical stocked item as such - a service is the more appropriate material type but maybe I'm wrong?
I have entered two entries using transaction OBYC (Maintain FI Configuration: Automatic Posting - Accounts) for Transaction Key GBB:
i) General Modification = blank
ii) General Modification = 'AUF'
... but this made no difference.
Can anyone advise how to resolve this issue please?
As an aside I am not sure how you ever know what entries are required in this table - how can you tell what General Modification values are relevant to any given scenario?

Hi Raja - yes this was useful but I am still having difficulties.
OK - So I can see from your notes that the Account Modifier that I was looking for was VAX associated with the Account Assigment Group of 'X' - good so I fixed the OBYC - GBB table to ensure I has a VAX - 3200 entry for consumption and it worked - great! BUT ...
I then wanted to get it so that my PO would create automatically so I:
i) Set the Auto PO on the Item Category
ii) Set the ALE paramenters asociated with the Sales Org definition
iii) Set the Auto PO on the Vendor Master
but that didn't work
I wanted to set the AUTO PO on the material master but as my MM was a DIEN this option was not available to me so I created another material that was NLAG (non-stocked) and tried again - this time I marked the Auto PO on material as well but it still didn't work because I am now geti8ng the message "Not possible to determine a consumption account" - Aaaarrrggghhhhh!!!
Everything else remains unchanged - BANS - CS etc.
Any ideas?

Plant change in Sales Order not possible due to Sales Order BOM

Hi all,
we are trying to change the Delivery Plant in a Sales Order after the creation of a Sales Order BOM, but it gives a V1773 message first, then a blocking error V1810. The same happens with a Production Order.
How can we change the Delivery Plant after the creation of one of these objects?
Our scenario:
- Make To Order
- Sales Order BOM created with transaction CS61
- Sales Order Routing created with transaction CA01
We need to create the Sales Order BOM on the Production Plant (which doesn't change), but we need to be able to change the Delivery Plant in any time.
Should you have further questions, feel free to ask.
Thanks in advance,
Giuseppe

Hello Caselli,
For V1773, please check the solution provided by note 588884, which is a modification. With this note it turns possible to delete all multi-level sales order BOM using transaction CSKB, which may be useful.
The behavior mentioned by you is the standard behavior of the system. The scenario works as designed, a plant change is only possible as long as there is no other document assigned to the sales order.
Longtext of V1 810 says:
The plant can no longer be changed in the following situations:
2. There is a production order for the order item but it is not a static assembly order.
Your scenario seems to be point 2 as mentioned above. You can check the requirement type (VBAP-BEDAE) and requirement class in OVZH and assembly type (MNTGA) in OVZG.
If you change the plant for the items with existing production orders, it will cause the incorrect values in the COPA. An order item is assigned to plant A and the corresponding production order exits. This
means that the costs are assigned to plant A (this is the place where the costs accrue). Order and production order will be balanced at plant A.
If you now, after the process has already started, should allow to change the order to plant B the following examples of problems will come up:
- The costs accrued in plant A (see production order)
- The SD order is now assigned to plant B, this means billing will be with plant B
This leads to the fact the costs are on plant A, plant B has a benefit. Plant A cannot settle the costs and plant B has unexpected earnings. Inconsistencies in all involved process steps, SD, CO, COPA are the results.
If you want to change the plant in the sales order you'll have to perform these steps:
= Delete the production order.
= Change the plant of the sales order item from A to C.
This should be possible unless there are other documents which are already assigned to this sales order item. Save.
= Create a new production order and assign it to the sales order item again.
I hope I am able to help you with this information.
Best Regards,
Bhavin Joshi

FB50 posting to internal order not possible.

I have another problem. We wanted to settle costs collected on internal orders to a balance sheet account. So I created a new order type, allocation structure, settle profile. But when I try to do fb50 and debit some expenses on this internal order I get a message "FI postings not allowed". Can you please help me with this.
Thanks.

Hi,
You would not have released the Order.
Once you release the order then only postings are possible.
If you have released and still you are unable to post transactions:
Then u need to check the status profile that you are using
Please award points suitably
Best Regards
Surya

Billing Plan: order changes possible after FAZ has been created?

Hi together,
I've got a question regarding the billing plan functionality. Is it possible to change the order in case the FAZ is already created? Everytime when I try this the system increases the down payment value and a new FAZ will be created. Even when I enter a free of charge material the system creates a new FAZ with value 0... That#s strange, isnt'it?
Thanks for your help, Christian

Hi Stefen,
We can do this ...but you can not look those fields .but you can through error messgaes . this you can do from user eixts or using BADI's. write code in such manner once if document delivey after that if user want to change any data just through error messages for him.
Thanks,
saleem

Change in item category and settlement of old sales order not possible

Hi
I have to settle sales orders in VA88 and transfer data to COPA. I want to do directly without result analysis. So, in the item category, I removed the result analysis key. And the settlement goes thru.
My issue is that there are orders in July 2010 which have to be settled, but it does not work since the changes in item category has happened this month in Aug 2010 and the July sales order are also invoiced.
Pl suggest a solution to settle the July sales order to COPA.
Thanks
kamala

Hi Kamala
I see only one possibility... The old sales order consists of some GL accounts posted in it which is not mapped in the allocation structure...
Alloc Str has 2 parts - i.e. One, it consists of a group of cost elements it has to handle and Two, it consists of the valid settlement receivers like PSG, CTR, etc
You say, this alloc str works well with new sales orders.... The 2nd part of alloc structure (i.e. valid receivers) applies equally to all sales orders.. But what can really differentiate the 2 sales orders is the cost elements posted on it...
I dont foresee any other posslbe reason
Regards
Ajay M

Additional Data On Actual Cost Line Item for Orders. Possible?

Is it possible to show on display of Actual Cost Line Item for Orders the cost center for both settled and not yet settled? As for now we can only view the cost centers that are already settled. Please see attached file for a snap picture of the display.
Thank you in advance.

Hi,
How this would be possible? If the document is not yet settled, then cost centre is unknown. Of course, it is stored in settlement rule, but no actual posting was done yet.
Regards,
Eli

Making layering order dynamic--possible (?)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for