Manche RAW thumbnails (DNG-Format) werden seit Mavericks im Finder zum Teil nicht angezeigt .., Manche RAW thumbnails (DNG-Format) werden seit Mavericks im Finder zum Teil nicht angezeigt ..

seit der Umstellung auf OS X 10.9.1 kann ich den Finder nicht mehr dazu bewegen, mir meine DNG-Dateien als Miniaturen anzuzeigen. Das Problem besteht in allen Ansichten. Auch in der Spaltenansicht wird keine Vorschau angezeigt, wenn man eine RAW-Datei auswählt. Vorschau öffnet die Bilder nach wie vor problemlos.
Meine DNGs kommen von einer Sony DSC-RX100 und werden in Lightroom bearbeitet und dann als DNG'S exportiert. Die RAW aus der Fotokarte sind sichtbar, nicht aber die exportierten DNG's nach der Bearbeitung in Lightroom.
Wer kennt eine Lösung, oder weiss ob es derzeit eine Lösun güberhaupt gibt.
LG

Hallo ich habe das gleiche Problem und wurde von Adobe an Apple verwiesen. Die Frage ist nur, wie kann ich Apple von diesem Problem berichten.
Ich finde keine Möglichkeit und bin daher wirklich sauer über ein Produkt, dass anscheinend die einfachsten Dinge, die Windows hinbekommt, nicht zu Stande bringt.
Das Programm Aperture sagt übrigens zu meinen DNG Files, dass es sie nicht lesen kann.

Similar Messages

Saving processed files in original raw (or DNG?) format

Hello. I'm new to Lightroom, so although I've spent a day or so ploughing through the tutorials, please accept my apologies if my question seems dumb.
However I can't see an answer to my problem so far.
It is this: after importing my raw files (CR2) into Lightroom and processing them etc to get them to a result I'm happy with, I'd now like to be able to keep the new, processed version of my images somewhere in Lightroom in the original raw format so that I can quickly access those processed images again in the future and then export in appropriate formats as I choose, which might be screen jpegs or prints or whatever – different from my first export.
In other words, I know I can 'save' (export) files to a folder as jpegs etc, but if I subsequently decide to export those same files in a different format (e.g prints), I don't want to have to go back to the original raw files and start the processing all over again to arrive at what I'd already been happy with, in order to re-export.
I suspect I'm missing something really basic here, but it's so basic I can't work out what it is!
I suppose another way of reframing the question might be: is there a way I can save and store my processed raw images in Lightroom so that I can access them easily, and not have to re-process them unless I want to?
I haven't yet got my head around DNG files. Is this part of the solution perhaps?
Lightroom is incredibly fantastic, but now that I've managed to get my images to where I want them, I don't want to re-visit the processing on them un-necessarily, which is what I seem to be doing at the moment...
I have Lightroom 5.4 on a Macbook Air running Mavericks OSX 10.9.2 if it makes any difference.
Thank you, I would be very grateful for your advice.

While the advice to read Victoria bampton's Quick Start Guide is excellent, I'd like to provide a little shorter piece of philosphy that might help
Lightroom works differenlty than any other software you may have used in the past. You would be wise to eliminate from your brain your ideas about how to manage files and edits that might have been present in your mind from your use of other photo editing software. You would be wise to start using Lightroom with a clean slate in your mind about how things work. Your statements above show clearly that you are thinking that Lightroom works the same as other photo managing/editing software, and this will lead you/already has lead you in the wrong direction, and in harmful directions.
So wipe the slate clean. Prepare to learn how to manage files and manage edits from a clean slate.
Things that are different about Lightroom
Lightroom is completely non-destructive editing. This means that the pixels in your original photos are NEVER (that's NEVER, a very strong word, chosen intentionally to mean, well it means NEVER) changed by Lightroom. This implies that you do NOT need to make a copy of a photo before you start editing it. Making a copy of a photo before you start editing it is a complete waste of time and disk space. (Also see side comment below)
Edits are not stored by saving a copy of the edited photo on your hard disk, as Photoshop or Photoshop Elements would do. Edits are not, by default, stored in the photo file itself. Edits are stored in the Lightroom catalog, which is a database file. The edits are essentially stored as numbers (example: Exposure +0.5, contrast +20, Highlights –15) in the catalog. You cannot turn this method of saving edits in the catalog off. As a result, if you close Lightroom after you perform some edits, and then open Lightroom again at some later time, your edits will be in the catalog, and displayed for you automatically, without you taking any specific "save" action or without you taking any specific action to tell Lightroom to display the edits.
However, some people make the critical mistake of removing the photos from Lightroom after the edits are completed ... this also removes the edits from Lightroom and (in Lightroom's default mode of operation) the edits are now lost forever. Even if you use an option in Lightroom to store the edits with the file, this mode of operation requires you to do more work and you recieve less benefits from Lightroom, than simply leaving the photos in Lightroom. Removing photos from Lightroom after the edits are completed is highly unrecommended.
Photos are never stored in Lightroom. Photos are always stored on your hard disk. They are stored wherever you put them, or where you instruct Lightroom to put them on your hard disk during Import. Lightroom maintains a link in its database to the file's location on disk. As a result, if you move or rename or delete your photos (or the folders that contain them) outside of Lightroom, then Lightroom cannot find the photos and you can no longer work with them in Lightroom. There are ways to fix this, but the best solution IN MY OPINION, is to no longer manage/organize your photos via operating system/folders/file names and to no longer manage/organize your photos by moving them from here to there after importing them; rather you should manage/organize your photos using Lightroom tools such as keywords and other metadata and then you not only have more powerful tools for managing/organizing than you have in your operating system, but the issue regarding Lightroom not being able to find your photos goes away
Side comment: in item 1 I said you don't have to make a copy before you edit the photos. However you do need to make backups (identical copies) of your original photos and catalog file on a different hard disk. This is to protect against the future situation where your hard disk will fail, resulting in the loss of your photos, and to protect against accidental erasure of your original photos. It is not to protect against Lightroom changing the pixels of your original photos, which as I said, Lightroom does not do.

DNG files not showing thumbnails preview icon on mac, after reduce/resize pixel count. Mavericks 10.9.2, Photoshop CC, ACR 8.4.0.199. Any Solution?

This is driving me crazy. With today's huge file sizes it seem to me that for the majority of pictures a pixel count of 12-16 mega pixels y more than ok size for editing and make printings; for the professional jobs is a good idea to have the biggest file we can. Due to that i was trying to convert some NEF files to DNG, saving some space in the process, But the impossibility to preview the picture's thumbnails and the file size (it displays 0x0) immediately take me to 1984, (Windows 3.11). and those are bad memories.
I don't know if this is an apple's or adobe's error, but it needs to be solved.
Anyone with the same predicament?

Thanks for your insight JimHess. Someone else on another post pointed out how Photoshop changes the color profile and other things and then trying to make this file into a DNG again confuses Mavericks (and, presumably, other flavors of OS X). Admittedly, the process I described is unorthodox and not what may want to do. Thank you.
A.J.: First, I am offended by your suggestion to omit my comment. I was simply trying to provide help in finding a cause of a general problem people are having across the internet. That problem, as you pointed out, is that modifying a DNG in some way in photoshop results in the thumbnail no longer being visible. Your modification is the size. Mine was not. But it was a general modification in photoshop and an attempt to reconstitute the file as a DNG that seems to be common theme, whether this workflow makes sense or not. Additionally, I'm very new to digital photography and tried to be helpful. I would advise you (as an educator who knows the consequences of negative first-time experiences) to be more mindful that not everyone on here is as experienced as you and everyone can benefit from being clearer in their questions and their comments.
Second, as JimHess pointed out, in manipulating a DNG file in any of the programs in a way that alters the actual file (not changing some setting that is ultimately stored in a side-car file or does not actually alter the photo) is probably the root of the problem. Changing the file size by altering pixel count may first require one of your adobe products to physically alter the file information in a way that stops Mavericks from being able to recognize the contents as RAW information. Does this make sense?
Best regards,
Robert

Leica RAW: Adobe updates DNG converter to migrate all cameras to one format

Hi All,
I saw that adobe has update their DNG converter to convert all camera RAW files to a universal RAW format and hoped that this would finally allow me to import my Leica DMR files into Aperture. I tried all possible methods with the new converter and none worked for my Leica DNG files. Sigh!
The wierd thing is that on the import screen I could see all the files and scale the thumbnails, which I couldn't do before * Even when I didn't embed a thumbnail in the converted DNG * but when the files were imported I got the red screen a non compatible file format message.
What's up with that and when will Apple provide support for even just the universal DNG format?
Eric

Hi Eric,
there is no "universal DNG format". DNG is not a "super JPG" format. It's more or less a wrapper around the (compressed) Raw file. A program that can read DNG (such as Photoshop CS) will not necessarily understand what's in that file if it doesn't know the camera's Raw format.
If we're lucky, we'll see more camera makers support DNG directly, and then the situation may much improve.
Read Scott Bourne's description in this thread:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1822792&#1822792
Cheers,
Karl

I need help! when I am importing my NEF files from my D3300 camera into lightroom 5 and try to use the "copy as DNG" button I always get an error message saying that "saying the file is not recognized by the raw format support"

I need help! when I am importing my NEF Raw files from my D3300 camera into lightroom 5 and try to use the "copy as DNG" button I always get an error message saying that "saying the file is not recognized by the raw format support". The whole purpose of that button is so that the file can be recognized... How can I make the "copy as DNG" button work as it is supposed too?? Thank you

Thank you for responding. So I essentially will never be able to use that button in lightroom 5? do I need to get LR 6? Will there ever be an update for LR 5 that will enable me to use it?
Does DNG Converter work within LR or do I have to upload pictures to my computer and then make a second copy in DNG format. and then go into LR and use them?
Thank you @dj_paige

I just purchased the new Canon SX60 camera. Despite downloading and installing the latest version of Adobe DNG converter, I receive an error message saying that Photoshop CS4 can't open up/convert raw files (.CR2). This is the same file format as used by

I just purchased the new Canon SX60 camera. Despite downloading and installing the latest version of Adobe DNG converter, I receive an error message saying that Photoshop CS4 can't open up/convert raw files (.CR2). This is the same file format as used by the SX50, with which I never had any problem. Does anyone have a suggestion on how to fix this problem? Thanks.

Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras I do not see that SX60 as supported. Just how new is the SX60 when was it announces. Its support is not even listed in ACR 8.7 RC

Aperture 3 and DNGs from LX5 raw files: unsupported image format

My LX5 arrived, and I tried converting a raw file to DNG with Adobe DNG Converter 6.2.0.21 beta and importing it into Aperture. No luck: Aperture says it's an unsupported image format. I tried setting the compatibility as far back as possible in the preferences, and still no luck. Any idea why this doesn't work? I used Adobe DNG Converter multiple times to work with raw files from unsupported cameras, so it's a real surprise to get the unsupported image file message.
—Andreas

Unfortunately, this is more about Apple dragging its feet than a cutting edge issue. I got an LX3 and upgraded to Aperture 3 in February of this year. RW2s straight out of the camera always imported just fine. However, I've never been able to get a DNG generated from an RW2 with Adobe DNG converter to work. Interestingly, DNGs from another file format I use (PEF) work fine in Aperture.
I submitted a issue report to Apple about the RW2 to DNG problem back in March, and like so many other suggestions to them, it seems to have vanished into the ether.

Plain raw format - DNG conversion

Dear All,
Would you guide me regarding to converting plain raw format file to DNG file?
<definition>
1. plain raw format file
- the file is composed of Bayer pixel array. For example, 5M pixel raw file is composed of sequential 2592 x 1920 pixels, each pixel is represented by 2byte value. file size will be 2592*1920*2 bytes. The start pixel may be one of Gr or Gb or R or B
2. tuning information file
- the files below may be provided for enhanced DNG raw image processing
- start pixel information: Gr or Gb or R or B
- 4channel lens shading correction
- noise profiling
- white balance R/B channel gain
- color correction matrix
- gamma table
<what is conversion guide?>
1. Is there any available program or utility for converting this plain raw format file to DNG?
2. if not available, how can I achieve the conversion using available toolkit?
3. any other idea?
Thanks in advance.

I don't think that any program exists that will do that.
You can however use the DNG SDK to do what you want: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/dng/dng_sdk.html
Sandy

I'm using LR5.7 on a Mac Mini running Mavericks and when I attempt to import a folder of new RAW photos from my external drive into my catalog instead of seeing a preview of each thumbnail photo I see the following message displayed: "Preview Unavailable

I'm using LR5.7 on a Mac Mini running Mavericks and when I attempt to import a folder of new RAW photos from my external drive into my catalog instead of seeing a preview of each thumbnail photo I see the following message displayed: "Preview Unavailable for this file." If I highlight any other folder of photos the previews are all there. What is the likely reason for these previews being unavailable? JohnnyCam

What camera took these RAW photos?
Did you use any Nikon software to transfer the photos to your computer's hard disk?

Will edited Raw files retain the xmp edited information when converting to DNG format?

I have a bunch of old nikon and canon Raw files that was edited in Photoshop Camera Raw. The Raw files have corresponding xmp files. I want to convert these edited Raw files into DNG format. Using the Photoshop Camera Raw converter or using the free Adobe DNG Converter tool - will the edited information from the Raw files be automatically converted over to DNG? What would be the best method to convert an edited RAW file into a DNG file, and retain all the editing (xmp files)? Thanks for help!!!

Using either the dng converter or camera raw though PS and Bridge will convert your RAW files to dng and keep the edited info from your xmp files, which will be add into the dng format. If you have a lot of files to convert, it might be faster to use the dng converter. Next choice would be to select them all in Bridge, right click and select "Open in Camera Raw."

"Unsupported format" with imported DNGs from Fujifilm E900 RAW files

When I import a DNG generated by Adobe DNG Converter 5.1 from a Fujifilm E900 RAW file, I get the dreaded "unsupported format" label. I thought Aperture 2.x was supposed to handle DNGs created from unsupported RAW formats. There was lots of hoopla around this when Aperture 2 was released. Now it doesn't work?
I'd really like to buy an E900, but not if I can't get the RAW images into Aperture.
Anyone got a workaround?

Thanks, Guys. I've tried doing the DNG conversions as both mosaic and linear, and neither works. Guess Aperture just doesn't like this camera. It's a shame, as the E900 is one of the few digicams that shoots RAW, and the only one available for under $200. Still, I don't want to have to go back to ACR to do my RAW conversions. Guess I'll have to wait for the price on the Panasonic DMC-LX3 to come down.

D750 Nikon are the camera raw or DNG file ready to work in the Raw format in Lightroom?

D750 Nikon are the camera raw or DNG file ready to work in the Raw format in Lightroom?

Crazy idea - do a site search for "D750"...

IPhoto and the .DNG format for RAW images...

Does anyone have any experience using the .DNG RAW format with iPhoto?
I'm considering converting my .CRW RAW images to .DNG (long story) and I'm wondering if I risk anything in doing so (especially when using iPhoto as it's my main photo management program).
Any advice would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Kristin.

Actually... I just noticed that Finder (in 10.4.11) had started to show previews of Panasonic FZ30-derived .DNG files. This camera is unsupported in Aperture and iPhoto. I'm not sure when this started, as I had already begun the process of picking a new camera, or moving to Lightroom.
Thinking, "That's funny, I wonder if..." and sure enough, iPhoto accepted a .DNG from the FZ30. Woot!
This is great! Now I can convert 16 MB RAW files to 8 MB dng's with Adobe DNG converter and stick with iPhoto for organisation. Just have to make sure DNG Converter doesn't convert the RAW to linear image.
I knew Apple wouldn't let me down. (Leave me twisting in the wind for awhile maybe)

HT201071 RAW format Problem with NIKON D600 after updating to maverick.

We still have problems after this update.
Pictures in RAW format imported to Aperture are brilliant as they are with the NIKON D600. Imported Pictures with the NIKON D800 are aweful. They are kind of grey without any saturation. To convert every single Picture to JPEG brings back their brilliance and colors. We have consulted the apple and the aperture support, but they dind't have any solution to fix our issue.
Any ideas?

Have you also asked in the Adobe forums? To have people read your post, best not to include long crash reports until asked to do so.

Is DNG a universal raw format?

I have DNG files converted from both a Nikon D70 and a D80. Now, ACDSee Pro 2.0 reads the former, but not the later (original Nikon NEFs, as well as the DNGs). Also, for example, Aperture's specs state that it only reads DNGs from cameras it already supports.
I thought that DNG is a universal format, in that that it doesn't matter from which format it was converted. Otherwise, what's the point of it?
So where is the problem in this case / in the DNG format or the poor implementation of software packages?

Adobe developed the DNG format with the intention of it being somewhat of a "universal" format. Something that could be used to "standardize" images from different cameras. Adobe has published the DNG specifications in an attempt to promote the format as such. But different companies have the option of implementing DNG support differently. I am not enough of a programmer to discuss all that is involved. I do know that other companies support DNG only for the cameras that they already support.
When RawShooter was still in existence they proudly announced that they were supporting DNG, but only for the cameras they already supported. I argued with them, stating that it was supposed to be a universal format. Their reply was (essentially) that Adobe didn't understand all the ramifications.
As far as Photoshop and ACR are concerned, the DNG format is pretty much universal. How other companies choose to implement the support is left entirely to that company's discretion.

Manche RAW thumbnails (DNG-Format) werden seit Mavericks im Finder zum Teil nicht angezeigt .., Manche RAW thumbnails (DNG-Format) werden seit Mavericks im Finder zum Teil nicht angezeigt ..

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for