Mapping for split a field to several subelements

Hi Experts,
How can I map these lines into my target using java mapping uml??
can you guys provide some code using java? coz I have no idea using java code.
<A_06>0</A_06>
<AB_07>256</AB_07>
<A_08>0</A_08>
<AB_09>257</AB_09>
<A_10>0</A_10>
<AB_11>259</AB_11>
<A_12>0</A_12>
<AB_13>260</AB_13>
<A_14>0</A_14>
<AB_15>262</AB_15>
<A_16>-1</A_16>
Thanks.

here it goes..
source message...
  \Identification_Code_Qualifier_02>92</Identification_Code_Qualifier_02>
\  Identification_Code_03>117</Identification_Code_03>
\ Quantity_04>0</Quantity_04>
  \Identification_Code_05>119</Identification_Code_05>
\  Quantity_06>0</Quantity_06>
\  Identification_Code_07>120</Identification_Code_07>
\  Quantity_08>0</Quantity_08>
\  Identification_Code_09>121</Identification_Code_09>
\  Quantity_10>0</Quantity_10>
\  Identification_Code_11>122</Identification_Code_11>
\  Quantity_12>0</Quantity_12>
\  Identification_Code_13>123</Identification_Code_13>
\  Quantity_14>0</Quantity_14>
\  Identification_Code_15>124</Identification_Code_15>
\  Quantity_16>0</Quantity_16>
\  Identification_Code_17>125</Identification_Code_17>
\  Quantity_18>0</Quantity_18>
\ Identification_Code_19>126</Identification_Code_19>
\  Quantity_20>0</Quantity_20>
\  Identification_Code_21>127</Identification_Code_21>
\  Quantity_22>0</Quantity_22>
\  /Destination_Quantity>
\- Destination_Quantity>
\  Identification_Code_Qualifier_02>92</Identification_Code_Qualifier_02>
\  Identification_Code_03>128</Identification_Code_03>
\  Quantity_04>0</Quantity_04>
\  Identification_Code_05>129</Identification_Code_05>
\  Quantity_06>0</Quantity_06>
\  Identification_Code_07>130</Identification_Code_07>
\  Quantity_08>0</Quantity_08>
\  Identification_Code_09>132</Identification_Code_09>
\  Quantity_10>0</Quantity_10>
\  Identification_Code_11>133</Identification_Code_11>
\  Quantity_12>0</Quantity_12>
\  Identification_Code_13>134</Identification_Code_13>
\  Quantity_14>0</Quantity_14>
\  Identification_Code_15>135</Identification_Code_15>
\  Quantity_16>0</Quantity_16>
\  Identification_Code_17>136</Identification_Code_17>
\  Quantity_18>0</Quantity_18>
\  Identification_Code_19>137</Identification_Code_19>
\  Quantity_20>0</Quantity_20>
\  Identification_Code_21>138</Identification_Code_21>
\  Quantity_22>0</Quantity_22>
\  /Destination_Quantity>
VDestination_Quantity>
\  Unit_or_Basis_for_Measurement_Code_01>EA</Unit_or_Basis_for_Measurement_Code_01>
\  Identification_Code_Qualifier_02>92</Identification_Code_Qualifier_02>
\  Identification_Code_03>139</Identification_Code_03>
\  Quantity_04>0</Quantity_04>
\ Identification_Code_05>140</Identification_Code_05>
\ Quantity_06>0</Quantity_06>
\ Identification_Code_07>141</Identification_Code_07>
\ Quantity_08>0</Quantity_08>
\ Identification_Code_09>142</Identification_Code_09>
\ Quantity_10>0</Quantity_10>
\  Identification_Code_11>143</Identification_Code_11>
\  Quantity_12>0</Quantity_12>
\  Identification_Code_13>144</Identification_Code_13>
\  Quantity_14>0</Quantity_14>
\  Identification_Code_15>145</Identification_Code_15>
\  Quantity_16>0</Quantity_16>
\  Identification_Code_17>146</Identification_Code_17>
\  Quantity_18>0</Quantity_18>
\  Identification_Code_19>147</Identification_Code_19>
\  Quantity_20>0</Quantity_20>
\  Identification_Code_21>148</Identification_Code_21>
\  Quantity_22>0</Quantity_22>
\  /Destination_Quantity>
\ - Destination_Quantity>
target it should result into this...
identification number = store number
quantity = qty
- Store No     Qty
-117     0
-119     0
-120     0
-121     0
-122     0
-123     0
-124     0
-125     0
-126     0
-127     0
-128     0
-129     0
-130     0
-132     0
-133     0
-134     0
-135     0
-136     0
-137     0
-138     0
-139     0
-140     0
-141     0
-142     0
-143     0
-144     0
-145     0
-146     0
-147     0
-148     0
Thanks
Edited by: Devilbatz on Oct 8, 2009 8:17 AM

Similar Messages

  • Delimiter in Syndication Maps for Multi-Valued Fields

    We are in the process of upgrading to MDM 7.1 from MDM 5.5.  In one of our syndication maps we are syndicating a multi-valued hierarchy field with no particular limit as to how many values the field can hold.  In the old MDM 5.5 Syndication map the xml output delimits this data with ";" (semi-colon) as in the below example.
    <Field>Level 1Level 2Value 1; Level 1Level 2Value 2;Level 1Level2Value 3</Field>
    In MDM 7.1 the values are separated by a "," (comma) like in the example below.
    <Field>Level 1Level 2Value 1, Level 1Level 2Value 2, Level 1Level2Value 3</Field>
    Is there anyway to change the delimiter in MDM 7.1 from a "," (comma) to a ";" (semi-colon) with out splitting the field?
    Thanks!
    Sincerely,
    Courtney

    Hi Brewer,
    Is there anyway to change the delimiter in MDM 7.1 from a "," (comma) to a ";" (semi-colon) with out splitting the field?
    Yes, for e.g in in your syndication map at source item lookup field display as follows
    Country
            |___ Code
            |___ Name
    just map country to destination item instead of using Code or Name, multi vaule will display with ; operator
    In one of our syndication maps we are syndicating a multi-valued hierarchy field with no particular limit as to how many values the field can hold.
    if you want to set length of field you require to set properties at destination item as follows :
    Fixed Column Width : the specific with  destination item
    Max Item Length : Maximum length allowed for the item 
    Hope Above mention point will resolved your problem if not revert back
    Thanks,
    Jignesh Patel

  • Mapping for a particular field

    HI Friends,
    In my source structure i have  field called "Purchase ID". I need to map this field to target based on one criteria as follows :
    Only the following Purchase ID's should be considered  from source xml.
    Purchase ID
    100
    101
    102
    103
    104
    I should not pick any other values. If i get any other values. we should throw expection.
    Kindly guide me friends.
    Renu

    Hi ,
    I used Fixed Values. I added all the values  under 'value  column'  and chose 'throw expection' option
    What i have to use under Key column ?
    When i places some dummy texts under key column and tried to test in Test tab. I got the following error
    Exception:[java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No value found for '101'] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib7.TextFunctions method fixed_values[101, FixedValues{ purchase1=101}, com.sap.aii.ib.bom.flib.types.ValueMappingStrategy@1f5c37b, , com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf7.rt.Context@6a12bdc] com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: Exception:[java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No value found for '101'] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib7.TextFunctions method fixed_values[101, FixedValues{purchase1=101}, com.sap.aii.ib.bom.flib.types.ValueMappingStrategy@1f5c37b, , com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf7.rt.Context@6a12bdc]
    kindly guide me

  • Descriptor exception for "missing mapping for field"

    I am using TopLink 9.0.3, oracle database 9, JVM 1.4.
    I got one DescirptorException that states that the descriptor misses mapping for one database field.
    However I have such field mapped through workbench.
    The is the exception.
    -----------------exception-----------------------
    LOCAL EXCEPTION STACK:
    EXCEPTION [TOPLINK-45] (TopLink - 9.0.3 (Build 423)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.DescriptorException
    EXCEPTION DESCRIPTION: Missing mapping for field [DatabaseField(DEVICEDB.DEVICEID)].
    DESCRIPTOR: Descriptor(ContactDB --> [DatabaseTable(DEVICEDB)])
    at oracle.toplink.exceptions.DescriptorException.missingMappingForField(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.descriptors.ObjectBuilder.extractValueFromObjectForField(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.descriptors.ObjectBuilder.extractValueFromObjectForField(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.mappings.OneToManyMapping.extractForeignKeyFromReferenceObject(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.mappings.OneToManyMapping.executeBatchQuery(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.mappings.OneToManyMapping.extractResultFromBatchQuery(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.indirection.NoIndirectionPolicy.valueFromBatchQuery(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.mappings.ForeignReferenceMapping.batchedValueFromRow(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.mappings.ForeignReferenceMapping.valueFromRow(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.mappings.DatabaseMapping.readFromRowIntoObject(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.descriptors.ObjectBuilder.buildAttributesIntoObject(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.descriptors.ObjectBuilder.buildObject(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.descriptors.ObjectBuilder.buildObjectsInto(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatabaseQueryMechanism.buildObjectsFromRows(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ReadAllQuery.execute(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.DatabaseQuery.execute(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ReadQuery.execute(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.internalExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.threetier.ServerSession.internalExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.indirection.QueryBasedValueHolder.instantiate(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.indirection.DatabaseValueHolder.getValue(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectList.buildDelegate(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectList.getDelegate(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectList.isEmpty(Unknown Source)
    The is my mapping file for DeviceDB and ContactDB. The ContactDB is a subclass of the DeviceDB.
    Clearly from the mapping below, the DeviceDB has a mapping for the database filed DeviceID.
    The ContactDB is a subclass of DeviceDB. Therefore the ContactDB also should have a mapping for
    database field deviceID
    ----------------------- partial mapping file for DeviceDB----------
    public Descriptor buildDeviceDBDescriptor() {
         Descriptor descriptor = new Descriptor();
         descriptor.setJavaClass(DeviceDB.class);
         descriptor.addTableName("DEVICEDB");
         descriptor.addPrimaryKeyFieldName("DEVICEDB.DBID");
         // Inheritance properties.
         descriptor.getInheritancePolicy().setClassIndicatorFieldName("DEVICEDB.CLASS");
         descriptor.getInheritancePolicy().addClassIndicator(ContactDB.class, "c");
         descriptor.getInheritancePolicy().addClassIndicator(ContentDB.class, "f");
         OneToOneMapping deviceMapping = new OneToOneMapping();
         deviceMapping.setAttributeName("device");
         deviceMapping.setReferenceClass(Device.class);
         deviceMapping.setRelationshipPartnerAttributeName("databases");
         deviceMapping.dontUseIndirection();
         deviceMapping.readOnly();
         deviceMapping.addForeignKeyFieldName("DEVICEDB.DEVICEID", "DEVICE.DEVICEID");
         descriptor.addMapping(deviceMapping);
         return descriptor;
    ---------------------------partial mapping for ContactDB --------------
    public Descriptor buildContactDBDescriptor() {
         Descriptor descriptor = new Descriptor();
         descriptor.setJavaClass(com.access.sync.business.contact.ContactDB.class);
         descriptor.addTableName("DEVICEDB");
         // Inheritance properties.
         descriptor.getInheritancePolicy().setParentClass(com.access.sync.framework.systemObj.DeviceDB.class);
    Any help is really appreciated.
    jason

    Your 1-1 mapping must not be read-only.
    deviceMapping.readOnly();Read-only means the mapping will not write the field, and should only be used when another mapping does write the field.

  • Message-Mapping: Use same RFC lookup for different target fields

    Hello,
    I need to apply an RFC Lookup which delivers a boolean flag back (true or false). This RFC lookup should be used for different target fields.
    Is there a way to execute the RFC lookup just once and then store the result in an internediate variable that I can use for all futher checks for different target fields?
    If this is not possible and I have to apply the RFC lookup for all necessary target fields is it then executed for each target field ? This is exactly what I want to avoid in order not to slow down performance.
    The input parameter (=source field value) would be the same.
    Thank you for your advice!

    Exactly.
    Here is a UDF example I have that you could adapt to your needs.
    Set
    public String setCounter(String a,String b,Container container){
    /* Store values in global datacontainer
    a: mapping value and return valueparameter
    b: name for stored value parameter
    GlobalContainer myGlobalContainer;
    myGlobalContainer = container.getGlobalContainer();
    myGlobalContainer.setParameter(b.toUpperCase(), a);
    return a;
    Get
    public String getCounter(String a,Container container){
       //write your code here
    GlobalContainer gc = container.getGlobalContainer();
    if (gc.getParameter(a) != null) {
      return String.valueOf(gc.getParameter(a));
    } else {
    return "1";

  • Mapping for Order Split

    Hello,
    We have a requirement that we would receive IDocs from a third party and we would send them back.
    But the condition is,if these ORDERS IDocs contain materials belonging to different distribution channel then IDoc has to be split in two (10 or 20 DC) having materials belonging to same DC.
    So at the max,we can have 2 IDocs created for 1 IDoc.
    How can we achieve this?
    Regards,
    Shweta

    Shweta,
    We have a requirement that we would receive IDocs from a third party and we would send them back.
    Through which adapter are you communicating to III party?
    Is it a Asynch scenario?
    As per my understanding, you need to split the incoming IDOCs based on the Distribution channel.
    I suggest you to use Multi Message mapping > then right click on Messages1 and select duplicate structure.
    Now provide the mapping for the first messages to execute for DC = 10 similary provide mapping for second message to execute for DC = 20.
    Enhanced interface determination if you want to send each one as different message.
    Regards,
    Venkat.

  • Function Module for splitting(field) in CO02 t-code

    Function Module or enhancement for splitting(field) in CO02 t-code Need function module for inserting a value in field(Max No of splits) in Transaction CO02
    Message was edited by:
            Mohan Kumar

    You can use this SAP enhancement PPCO0012 to display your own additional
    information on a separate tab page in the production order header. You
    can also make user fields avaialble for input, change them, and return
    the changes to the order header.

  • Document splitting causes field overflow for currency type 00 in row 003

    Hi ,
    Friends ,
    Our some of sales bills are stucking iduring  posting to finance after upgrading support packages, earlier there was no any problem.
    we are trying to post by tcode vf02 , it is throughing an error message
    Document splitting causes field overflow for currency type 00 in row 003
    Message no. GLT0004
    We are not getting any solution .
    We have raised a message to sap support , but not getting proper solution,
    Please guid us how can we solve this.
    SS
    Mobile no. 9810477923- Sundeep Gupta

    Thanks for all.
    we have solved this issue  after change some customization according sap support consultant reply as under.
    you have 3 different issues within your SD- new g/L interface.
    The most critical one is the fact that you substitute PRCTR and
    Segment assignemnts into line items to be processed by rule based
    split. This leads to the fact that you will only those cases will be
    able to post document in case the assignemnts are unique,
    which means no different kind of prctr, segment and business area
    assignments but only one single kind. This makes no sence at all.
    Please see my last reply regarding this most critical issue.
    This needs to be solved from Consulting point of view.
    Regards.
    SS
    Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Dec 22, 2010 12:21 PM
    When you say it is answered why you have closed the thread with Closed but Unanswered.  Please change it to "Answered".

  • Missing mapping for field error

    Here is the set up:
    Person extends Party using InheritanceType.JOINED
    Household extends Party_Relationship using InheritanceType.JOINED
    Household has a Set of Persons mapped One to Many unidirectional
    When I use PrimaryKeyJoinColumn on the Person and/or Household to rename the column say to PERSON_POID instead of PARTY_POID and when adding Persons to the Household Set the following error occurs:
    oracle.toplink.essentials.exceptions.DescriptorException
    Exception Description: Missing mapping for field [PERSON.PARTY_POID].
    Descriptor: RelationalDescriptor(com.dhsnet.cms.domain.Person --> [DatabaseTable(PARTY), DatabaseTable(PERSON)])
    What am I missing? If I do not use the PrimaryKeyJoinColumn mapping this error does not occur. I am stumped! Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Here are the mappings:
    @Entity
    @TableGenerator(name="party", table="generator", pkColumnName="table_name",
    valueColumnName="key_value", pkColumnValue="party", allocationSize=1)
    @Table(name="PARTY")
    @Inheritance(strategy=InheritanceType.JOINED)
    @DiscriminatorColumn(name = "PARTY_TYPE")
    public abstract class Party extends AbstractEntity{
    @Entity
    @DiscriminatorValue("PERSON")
    @PrimaryKeyJoinColumn(name="PERSON_POID")
    public class Person extends Party{
    @Entity
    @Table(name="PARTY_RELATIONSHIP")
    @TableGenerator(name="party_relationship", table="generator", pkColumnName="table_name",
    valueColumnName="key_value", pkColumnValue="party_relationship", allocationSize=1)
    @Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.JOINED)
    @DiscriminatorColumn(name = "PARTY_RELATIONSHIP_TYPE", discriminatorType=DiscriminatorType.STRING)
    public abstract class PartyRelationship extends AbstractEntity {
    @Entity
    @DiscriminatorValue(value="HOUSEHOLD")
    @PrimaryKeyJoinColumn(name="HOUSEHOLD_POID")
    public class Household extends PartyRelationship {
    On the Household Object:
    @OneToMany
    @JoinTable(joinColumns = @JoinColumn(name="HOUSEHOLD_POID"),
    inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name="PERSON_POID"))
    protected Set<Person> getMembers() {
    return members;
    }

    This looks to be the same/related issue that has already been entered. See
    https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1586
    The alternative like you mentioned, is to not use a PrimaryKeyJoinColumn to rename the column in the joined inheritance case.
    Cheers,
    Guy

  • Mapping for field which appear more than once.

    Hi experts.
    My source and target structure is:
    Field1
    Field2
    Field3
    ___Child1
    ___Child2
    ___Child3
    Field4
    Field3 may appear a few times in the source message.
    For example:
    Field1
    Field2
    Field3
    ___Child1
    ___Child2
    ___Child3
    Field3[1]
    ___Child1
    ___Child2
    ___Child3
    Field3[2]
    ___Child1
    ___Child2
    ___Child3
    Field4
    I need to pass to the target structure the "Field3" who's "Child1" is greater than 5 and  "Child2" is greater than 10 and  "Child3" is greater than 15.
    My problem is that the condition is executed only once for the first "Field3",
    and if the check returns
    "True" all the "Field3" are copied.
    if "False" is returns no one of the "Field3" is passed.
    How should i hold the context for it, in order each of the "Field3" elements passes the condition?
    Regards Max.

    hi,
    map required Field3& Child1 field with the target with the required conditions and set the context of both to  the higher level.
    Regards,
    NJ

  • Document Splitting causes field overflow for currency type 10 in row 007

    Dear All,
    At the time of Invoice through FB60 system is showing the above error Document Splitting causes field overflow for currency type 10 in row 007  & Message No :  GLT0004.  What could be the reason. 
    Regards

    Dear Raj,
    Please refer below link
    Document splitting causes field overflow for currency type 00 in row 003
    Br,Vivek

  • Document splitting causes field overflow for currency type 10 in row 001

    Hi Experts,
    I come across below error, while posting an entry in to SAP.
    "Document splitting causes field overflow for currency type 10 in row 001"
    Request your help in resolving the above.
    regards,
    Gopala

    Dear expert
             Document Splitting causes field overflow for currency type 10 in row 007
             GLT0004 - Document splitting causes causes field overflow
    Regards
       Ajeesh.s

  • On activating persistent class: There is no mapping for one or more fields

    Hi all,
    I'm using an ECC 6.0 system.
    I've just created a persistent class and defined the persistence. When I try to activate the class activating fails and I get the message "There is no mapping for one or more fields."
    I did not, in fact, use all the fields of the database table I defined the persistence on. When I do use all the fields activating the class works without a problem.
    However, as far as I know it should be possible to select only some of the fields when defining the persistence (the only fields I have to select are all the key fields of the table and I've done this).
    Has anybody encountered the same problem or has anybody any idea on this?
    Cheers,
    Kathy

    Hi Kathy,
    this is exactly what I meant.
    If you'd like, then you can also take a look at the documentation: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b0/9d0a3ad259cd58e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    There under Mapping, you can find:
    "You must map all columns of a database table to attributes. If you only want to manage some of the columns using Object Services, you must create a database view."
    Making attributes private doesn't change the fact, that you still map all fields. If you have a lot of fields, which you don't want to map, then I will again suggest, that you define a DB-view. This will boost the performance of your implementation.
    In case you need "quality 1st" performance, then I would suggest to use an ABAP implementation with internal tables, instead of the Persistent Service.
    HTH,
    Hristo

  • Lazy loading or indirection for direct to field mapping striing object

    Hi,
    I need to achieve indirection for String instance variable, currently mapped using direct to field mapping.
    This field is a text column in sql server storing large data which is rarely read.
    Recently we have been noticing that it is causing lot of IO on our SAN system.
    Is there a way indirection can be achieved for this which is currently mapped as direct to field.
    I have tried using indirection in transformation mapping. But profiling db indicates above mentioned text column is still part of the select query.
    Thanks
    Nagesh

    Hi Nagesh,
    There is no support for lazy loading of DirectToField mappings in TopLink 10.1.3 POJO persistence. Typically, people who have large CLOBs or BLOBs will put them in a separate table to avoid loading them with their owner. If you can't refactor your data model to accomodate this things get more complicated. Do you ever update these large structures are they read only in your application? If they are read only then a very simple approach is to not map the large data column and instead lazily load the data with a report query.
    Ideally you would upgrade to TopLink JPA in 11g where lazy loading of Basic mappings is supported. :-)
    --Shaun                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • Need you help !!! -- datasource field to ECC table mapping for 0material

    Dear experts:
    Recently we need to get a quick turnaround on the fields we would be bringing into BW through standard extractors for the tables MARC and MBEW. My idea is to look at those master data extractors like 0MATERIAL, 0PLANT and then try to find how fields in datasource mapped to ECC table.
    So now I have 2 questions need your suggestion:
    1. Is my way above feasible or any other way to get the fields mapping information for one specific table (Not datasource) ?
    2. For 0MATERIAL_ATTR, I can neither find the table of origin for those datasource fields in SAP Library, nor in Tcode LBWE (Seems LBWE only for transaction data?). Can anybody give me a link for the fields mapping of 0MATERIAL and 0PLANT? or let me know where I can find those mapping information?
    Any reply would be appreciated and thank you all in advance !
    Best Regards
    Tim

    Well, the idea is simple. If you are using master data, then the easiest way is to find out which table is the master data stored. For eg. Material master data is stored in MARA table. Therefore 0MATERIAL_ATTR fetches data from the MARA table.
    The next option is to check the function module.
    1) Goto RSO2, and enter the data source name->display. The system wil throw a warning giving you the FM.
    2) For eg. 0MATERIAL_ATTR will throw the error "DataSource 0MATERIAL_ATTR is extracted using functional module MDEX_MATERIAL_MD".
    3)Go to SE37, and put the FM->display. Then go to the tables tab. You will see tables like BIW_MARA_S. The middle term is usually the table.
    Another option is go to table RSGENFIELDMAP and put the field in the field selection. This would give the mapping.
    Regards.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Follow-up to Slow Web Pages/Fast Internet Speed

    After trying everything I could, which included redownloading Safari, cleaning out preference files, resetting network, I still had extremely slow loading web pages and links. Dowloads were fast. Loading very slow. Today, I tried an archive and insta

  • Price change in Schedule agreement but not updated in CDHDR and CDPOS

    Hi Experts We have change price in  SA ,please see the below screen shot. But these changes not update in CDHDR and CDPOS. We can see current rate in ME33L. Please guide how to update these changes. Regards Parkash Chand

  • Connecting apple notebook to tv

    can anyone help me i want to connect my laptop to my tv does anyone know what cables i need and how easy it is please and thank you

  • T430s for dual monitor without dock

    Hi, I have a T430s with HD4000 and core i7 CPU.  Would anyone tell me if it is possible to connect two external monitors one using VGA and another using miniDP->VGA/DVI?  I only have limited desktop space so I do not want to put a dock on it. If it i

  • Preview as default

    I have recently downloaded Adope Reader and it has taken over as default from Preview. how do i reset preview as default reader?