"Master Line" query

I am very sorry if this is a stupid question. I just want to clarify. I am hopefully getting BT Infinity installed shortly and I note about it needing the "master phoneline"
We have 2 separate phone lines in the house i.e 2 separate numbers & charged for 2 line rentals. One is downstairs and the phone we use for calls. The one upstairs is used for the internet (although I have a phone here too).
Can I assume they are both classed as "master lines"
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi yes that is correct they would be separate lines in your case so you will need to specify which number you want infinity on when you place your order
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Similar Messages

Master Line Form in Apex

Dear All,
We have created a master child form in our application using Oracle Application Express, Using this Form, we are able to do some modification in the child table based on the foreign key that exist in the master table. But in the line form we have one more additional column(called Row Selector) which is created by the system itself and not available in the query given by me and it looks something like check box, if i try to remove or hide that check box the modifications are not happening and its throwing me error while submitting. After selecting this check box and submitting the form, the data is getting removed from my master table. I want to submit the form with out this row selector column and it should be hidden in the form. Some one please help me out in sorting this issue.
Regards
sanjay

Dear Arun,
I would like to hide the column (row Selector) in the Apex Master Line Form. In case if hide that column, while submitting the form, update is not happening properly as row selector is used as a key for updating the line item in the form. Please help me in sorting out the issue.
Regards
Sanjay

Select List based on in-line query

Hello everyone, im having a problem creating a select list with the following query:
select result.A d, result.B r
from dual,
(select RMF.nome A, RMF.chapa B
from
medfa_marco_has_colaborador MC,
medfa_projeto_has_colaborador MP,
rm_funcionario RMF
where
MC.mar_id = :P3_SELECT_MARCO and
MC.pro_col_id = MP.pro_col_id and
MP.chapa = RM.chapa) result
but i keep getting the
"LOV query is invalid, a display and a return value are needed, the column names need to be different. If your query contains an in-line query, the first FROM clause in the SQL statement must not belong to the in-line query."
Thnx in advance.
E.R

Okay, first off - does this work in SQL Workshop?
Have you got a semi-colon at the end of the query (you shouldn't have)?
Also when posting code put {noformat}{noformat} before and after your code to preserve formatting and spacing.
Cheers
Ben
http://www.munkyben.wordpress.com
+Don't forget to mark replies helpful or correct+ ;)

Master based query, not showing value of a particular field.

There's a customer master based query, where there's an attribute named, "ship to number", when i apply the selection range or >=, or > for that master, my ship to number field comes blank, inspite of having full data in it.
Whereas when i enter the selection screen as equal to (=) for that master, my field gets populated in the query.
What can be the cause, the field is not in compounding with the master.

Hi,
This could be ALPHA conversion. Try giving a full number prefixing with 000 to make full length
Hope this helps
PV

In-line query Problem

I'm having a problem with this query:
SELECT
Temp.*, (SELECT MAX(Tran_Amount) FROM Temp) x
FROM
SELECT
claim_num , SUM(tran_amt) Tran_Amount
FROM
BENDETL BD
GROUP BY claim_num
) Temp
I get the error table does not exist (referring to Temp).
Is there a way I could re-write this query without having to re-write the in-line query Temp. Temp is actually more complicated than what
I have here, so I really do not want to re-write it. If we had Oracle 10, I could use the 'with' statement, I can't since we have 8i!
Message was edited by:
Denis the 'Thief'

Something like this
SQL> select deptno, sum(sal) sal_amount
2 from emp group by deptno;
    DEPTNO SAL_AMOUNT
        30       9400
        20      10875
        10       8750
SQL> edi
Wrote file afiedt.sql
1 select v.*, max(sal_amount) over () x
2 from (
3      select deptno, sum(sal) sal_amount
4      from emp group by deptno
5*     ) v
SQL> /
    DEPTNO SAL_AMOUNT          X
        10       8750      10875
        20      10875      10875
        30       9400      10875

Master - Line - Details

I am new to using JDev and trying to develop a Master - Lines -Details using ADF. The master record can have multiple lines. Each line can have multiple details.
I have figured out how to do the master lines but not the three tier structure. Any pointers would be appreciated.
Thank you

You didn't mention which technologies you use.
But assuming you are using ADF BC and JSF this should be trivial - you just have the EO's with associations and a three level views at the AM level.
Here is a basic Master-Detail how-to:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe1013jdev/10131/masterdetail_adf_bc/master-detail_pagewith_adf_bc.htm

PR creation using BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE, Service lines query

Hi,
I am trying to create the PR for service agreements and i'm able to create the same.
My first query is how to populate the data in LIMIT tab(Overall Limit & Expected value) for each line item of PR. I am using BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE but its not populating the values in LIMIT tab.
2nd Query: BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE is not checking the validity of the Requisitioner ID and even if the ID is not valis it is creating the PR. Does this BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE restrict this? I guess it does not. I have created so many PR with invalid ID's while testing and it seems this bapi doesn't care about requisitioner id at all. Please advice some workaround.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks
Randhir

Solved.

Master-details query to XML file?

Hi:
I'm new in XML and Oracle. I want to create XML file from two tables (master-details).
I made a small serach and tried some examples:
Say we have these tables:
CREATE TABLE "TEST_XML"
( "ID" NUMBER,
 "NAME" VARCHAR2(15),
 "AMOUNT" NUMBER,
 CONSTRAINT "TEST_XML_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("ID") ENABLE
CREATE TABLE "TEST_XML2"
( "ID2" NUMBER,
 "NAME2" VARCHAR2(20),
 "AMOUNT2" NUMBER
ALTER TABLE "TEST_XML2" ADD CONSTRAINT "TEST_XML2_FK" FOREIGN KEY ("ID2")
 REFERENCES "TEST_XML" ("ID") ENABLE
INSERT INTO TEST_XML VALUES (1,'A',50);
INSERT INTO TEST_XML VALUES (2,'B',30);
INSERT INTO TEST_XML VALUES (3,'C',70);
INSERT INTO TEST_XML2 VALUES (1,'AA',10);
INSERT INTO TEST_XML2 VALUES (1,'AB',20);
INSERT INTO TEST_XML2 VALUES (1,'AC',20);
INSERT INTO TEST_XML2 VALUES (2,'BA',10);
INSERT INTO TEST_XML2 VALUES (2,'BB',20);
INSERT INTO TEST_XML2 VALUES (3,'CA',20);
INSERT INTO TEST_XML2 VALUES (3,'CB',40);
INSERT INTO TEST_XML2 VALUES (3,'CC',10);
I want a query to create XML file contains data from TEST_XML table and for each row the related data from TEST_XML2 table.
I did some tries (working in iSQL*PLUS):
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
DECLARE
v_ctx DBMS_XMLGEN.ctxType;
v_file Utl_File.File_Type;
v_xml CLOB;
v_more BOOLEAN := TRUE;
BEGIN
-- Create XML document from query.
v_ctx := DBMS_XMLGEN.newContext('select id,name,amount,cursor (select id2,name2,amount2 from test_xml2 t2 where t2.id2=t1.id) val from test_xml t1');
DBMS_XMLGEN.setMaxRows(v_ctx, 10);
DBMS_XMLGEN.setRowsetTag(v_ctx, 'CLAIM');
-- Output XML document to file.
v_file := Utl_File.FOpen('TEST_DIR', 'test1.xml', 'w');
WHILE v_more
LOOP
v_xml := DBMS_XMLGEN.GetXML(v_ctx,0);
EXIT WHEN dbms_xmlgen.getNumRowsProcessed(v_ctx) =0;
Utl_File.Put(v_file,v_xml);
END LOOP;
Utl_File.FClose(v_file);
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(SUBSTR(SQLERRM,1,255));
Utl_File.FClose(v_file);
END;
But hte output wasn't as I wanted:
<CLAIM>
<ROW>
<ID>1</ID>
<NAME>A</NAME>
<AMOUNT>50</AMOUNT>
<VAL>
<VAL_ROW>
<ID2>1</ID2>
<NAME2>AA</NAME2>
<AMOUNT2>10</AMOUNT2>
</VAL_ROW>
<VAL_ROW>
<ID2>1</ID2>
<NAME2>AB</NAME2>
<AMOUNT2>20</AMOUNT2>
</VAL_ROW>
<VAL_ROW>
<ID2>1</ID2>
<NAME2>AC</NAME2>
<AMOUNT2>20</AMOUNT2>
</VAL_ROW>
</VAL>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<ID>3</ID>
<NAME>C</NAME>
<AMOUNT>70</AMOUNT>
<VAL>
<VAL_ROW>
<ID2>3</ID2>
<NAME2>CA</NAME2>
<AMOUNT2>20</AMOUNT2>
</VAL_ROW>
<VAL_ROW>
<ID2>3</ID2>
<NAME2>CB</NAME2>
<AMOUNT2>40</AMOUNT2>
</VAL_ROW>
<VAL_ROW>
<ID2>3</ID2>
<NAME2>CC</NAME2>
<AMOUNT2>10</AMOUNT2>
</VAL_ROW>
</VAL>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<ID>2</ID>
<NAME>B</NAME>
<AMOUNT>30</AMOUNT>
<VAL>
<VAL_ROW>
<ID2>2</ID2>
<NAME2>BA</NAME2>
<AMOUNT2>10</AMOUNT2>
</VAL_ROW>
<VAL_ROW>
<ID2>2</ID2>
<NAME2>BB</NAME2>
<AMOUNT2>20</AMOUNT2>
</VAL_ROW>
</VAL>
</ROW>
</CLAIM>
Notice that for each details (from TEST_XML2) there is <VAL> tag which I don't need beside i want a query which is applicable on all environments.
May anyone help me please......
Regards,
Saad

The following looks like it produces your desired output. I used the WITH to simulate your two tables so I didn't have to CREATE them. This runs on 10.2.0.1. I'm not sure what bugs you are referring to as SQL/XML is stable in 10g that I have seen. I'm sure some bugs exist somewhere in it, just not with this usage. Just start with the SELECT statement to run on your system.
WITH test_xml AS
(SELECT 1 ID, 'A' name, 50 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 2, 'B', 30 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 3, 'C', 70 FROM DUAL),
test_xml2 AS
(SELECT 1 ID2, 'AA' name2, 10 amount2 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 1, 'AB', 20 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 1, 'AC', 20 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 2, 'BA', 10 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 2, 'BB', 20 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 2, 'BC', 20 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 3, 'CA', 20 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 3, 'CB', 40 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 3, 'CC', 10 FROM DUAL)
SELECT XMLElement("CLAIM",
 XMLAgg(
 XMLElement("ROW",
 XMLForest(id "ID",
 name "NAME",
 amount "AMOUNT"),
 (SELECT XMLAgg(XMLElement("VAL_ROW",
 XMLForest(id2 "ID2",
 name2 "NAME2",
 amount2 "AMOUNT2")))
 FROM test_xml2 t2
 WHERE t2.id2=t1.id)
FROM test_xml t1This solution works in any environment where you can issue a SQL statement from, be it SQL*Plus, PL/SQL, Java, etc.

Master/Detail query problem

I have two VO, masterVo and detailVo, which assoicated with a VL.
I create a page to query the masterVo and show the result master data and related detail data.
Can I add a query criteria to filter the detailVo?
Now I can only set where clauses in masterVo, is it possible to set where clauses both in masterVo and detailVo?

I don't use query region for my master/detail data query, because the query result is in hgrid region on the other page.
So I use controller to send the query criteria into AM for query. In masterVoImpl.java, I combine query
criteria to Where clauses to initiate query. I have one query criteria belong to detailVo attr, How can I put the detailVo criteria
and masterVo query criteria at one query?
Thanks a lot.
Louis

Master Detail Query automatic query ..Urgent help

In my last question, I asked about how to automatically query a form based on table or master detail and gota good answer. What I actually need to do is also query on the detail, for example
select a.user_id, b.week_ending,b.mon_hrs,b.tues_hrs
from emp_profile a, time_reporting_week b
where user_id = portal30.wwctx_api.get_user
and week_ending = '02-JAN-02'
and a.user_id = b.user_id
So I know that I can query on master table which is emp profile, but I also need to query on week ending which is in detail. Do I change the clause in my form pacjage?Or should I change something in Additional Pl/sql ??

There are two ways to achieve this. Both methods have some drawbacks, so please go through them and choose the one that suits you.
Method 1:
=========
This method does not require altering the form package.
Assumptions : The detail table has a column named WEEK_ENDING.
Steps :-
1> Edit the form and select the query button in the left frame of the master section.
2> For the pl/sql button event handler, choose the action as Query and replace the default code with the following :-
declare
l_where varchar2(4000);
l_where_pre varchar2(4000);
l_where_post varchar2(4000);
l_where_pos integer;
l_week_ending varchar2(4000);
l_lang varchar2(4000);
begin
p_session.get_shadow_value(
p_block_name => 'DETAIL_BLOCK',
p_attribute_name => 'A_WEEK_ENDING',
p_index => 1,
p_value => l_week_ending,
p_language => l_lang);
doQuery;
if l_week_ending is not null then
l_where := p_session.get_value_as_varchar2(
p_block_name => 'DEFAULT',
p_attribute_name => '_DETAIL_WHERE_CLAUSE',
p_index => 1
l_where_pos := instr(l_where,' WHERE ');
l_where_pre := substr(l_where,1,l_where_pos+6);
l_where_post := substr(l_where,l_where_pos+7);
l_where_post := 'week_ending = '||l_week_ending||' and '||l_where_post;
l_where := l_where_pre || l_where_post;
p_session.set_value(
p_block_name => 'DEFAULT',
p_attribute_name => '_DETAIL_WHERE_CLAUSE',
p_value => l_where,
p_index => 1);
QueryDetail(
p_mode => 'QUERY' ,
p_session => p_session);
end if;
end;
3> Click on OK to finish editing the form.
4> Run the form - enter query criteria for the master fields and enter the week-ending criterion in the 1st detail
field under Week Ending. Click the Query button.
Advantage:
You will not lose your changes even if you edit the form later on.
Drawback:
In this method, the querying process will be bit slow as we are querying for the detail records twice.
Once through onQuery and the second time after constructing the new where clause with the additional conditon
for the detail rows.
Method 2
========
This method requires altering the form generated package.
Steps :-
1> In the form package, you will find a onQuery procedure. Towards the end of the procedure, you will find a statement like
"_detail_where_cond" := "_detail_where_cond" || ' WHERE ' || ...
2> As the name of the variable suggests, this where condition will be used while querying the detail block. You need to
add a new clause to this for the week_ending column. Prior to that you need to fetch the shadow value for A_WEEK_ENDING.
3> Your altered code should look something like :-
p_session.get_shadow_value(
p_block_name => 'DETAIL_BLOCK',
p_attribute_name => 'A_WEEK_ENDING',
p_index => 1,
p_value => l_week_ending,
p_language => l_lang);
if l_week_ending is not null then
"_detail_where_cond" := "_detail_where_cond" || ' WHERE WEEK_ENDING = ' || l_week_ending || ' AND ' || --existing code
else
--- use the original code here
"_detail_where_cond" := "_detail_where_cond" || ' WHERE ' || ...
end if;
4> Compile the package body and run the form.
Advantage:
In this method we will be querying the detail rows just once. Unlike in method 1.
Disadvantage:
You will lose your alterations once you create a new version of the form by editing it. You need to recompile the package
after re-introducing your changes.

Data Template---master details query--Help

Hi
we are using XML Publisher attached to R12 , we are using data template ( .XML file) in data definition .
we have a requirement for master details report. for that we have parent query and child query .the data coming to parent query should be the parameter to child query
Exp-- Parent Query-- select empno from emp
Child Query --select * from dept where empno=:p_empno (p_empno =empno from Parent query )
For this requirement we are creating a data template (.XML file) . we are successfully to write for the parent query, but we fails when come to child query. Please help us how it can be wrote in data template . You can send any example related to this issue.

Parent Query - select empno as emp_no from emp
Child Query - select * from empno where empno=:emp_no

Legality of master line socket

Hi, When we moved into our rented accomodation the telephone access point in the lounge did not work. I searched the house for a master socket but couldn't find one.
So I called the rental agency, and they sent one of their employees out who did some adhoc messing about (there were two access points in the lounge) and he cut some wires and bodged a connection together from a combination of both sockets.
Our BB connection has always synched much lower than it should, which I have always put down to dodgy internal wiring & not being able to find the master socket hasn't helped.
Now a friend has identifed that the access point in the lounge is actually a very ancient master socket. I have read that it is against the law to touch or modify the master socket which is BTs property.
However as I work from home I would really like to get the speed sorted out and have a decent master socket fitted.
So I have several questions,
1) If we get an engineer out, are there any legal ramifications of the socket being modified (I can happily point them to the man who did it - but he does own the rental agency we rent the house from, so it could jeopordise our accomodation)
2) Who would be liable for the bill to repair / replace the master socket?
I would love to get some advice from an actual BT rep if possible please?
EDIT: Does anyone from BT read or respond on these forums?

Devon_Dave wrote:
hamish72 wrote:
I think some master sockets have terminals for the user to attach extension wiring so that would be legal whilst any work up to that point would not and your old socket probably has not got that feature
Master sockets do not have a customer connection point, only line boxes (NTE5) do
Several misconceptions creeping in here.
1 An NTE5 is a master socket. It does have customer-accessible terminals. How else do you think extension wiring would be attached ?
2 Very old sockets are identifiable by having no split in the faceplate. They date from the days when BT provided and owned all the wiring, and there was no need to have a demarcation point between BT and the customer's network. If that is what exists, it should be replaced at no cost by BT Openreach during any fault tracing work. If you just want it replaced, you will be charged (lots !).
3 Any work undertaken by BT to sort out bodged customer wiring will be charged. The person who will be charged is the current owner of the telephone line account - regardless of who actually did the deed. There's no question of prosecution these days (if there ever was).
4 It's perfectly possible for bodged wiring to screw up DSL sync speeds, without necessarily introducing noise interference. If the wiring has been "Tee'd" in to circuit (that is - forming a sort of "Y" with one input and two outputs), it can cause a large "Impedance discontinuity". This will ruin the "Frequency response" of the line and this will cause lowered sync rates. (This is a common problem in customers' wiring, but some electricians and telecom technicians aren't aware of this).
Getting this fixed is up to the person who pays the line rental. It's quite clear that someone has badly bodged the wiring, and it needs a professional (that is - a BT technician) to sort it out. This has to be paid for. The OP made a fair point about not upsetting the landlord - but it's the landlord who has been let down by a cowboy handyman.

BP Master Data Query

I have a BP Master Record. I need to export it to an excel file for testing.
when i open a record for export the Export to Excel icon is grayed out. How do i do the export?Please help me on the same
Thanks,
Kanthi.

Hi Kanthi,
If you look at the Sales Order or transaction data export file, it will only export the Row Data.
BP Master does not have any rows but just Master data spread across Tabs. You have two options
In the BP Master .. Find mode Enter * and hit find and it will display all the columns from the Master Data, You can add more columns by clicking on Form Settings (Tools > Form Settings OR CTRLShiftS).
Then Export this list to Excel.
The Other Option is to use Reports > Query Generator / Query Wizard and Select table OCRD, CRD1 to select Master data and address data and then export to Excel.
Let me know if you need further help.
Suda

Master data query display limited to 10000 records

Hi,
When I run a query based on master data objects like 0CUSTOMER, the query displays only 10000 records instead of about 50000. This happens with all other master data items. This happens after the upgrade to 2004S. We still use frontend 3.5. Transaction data displays are correct. Has anybody faced this problem? Can someone suggest the solution for this?
Thanks.
Param

Hi
Check out note -
955487- Master data InfoProvider reads only 10000 records
Implement the advanced corrections as SP-09 is too far to be released.
Hope it Helps.
Chetan
@CP..

Could not view data in the Em while in the command line query works

Hi, all,
I have met with this problem for several times.
I have an Oracle 10.0.2.0 running on Redhat linux E3.
After I insert or just input some data in a table. I could see the new data in the command line.
SQL> select * from tablename;
But I could not see the new data in the EM. If I export the table to, say, MS Access, the new data doesn't show. The data is there, but I have to wait for some time. (several mins to hours)
Do you have any idea of it??
Thank you very much!
Qian

Thank you for your reply.
Why sometimes it doesn't show in other sessions, but sometimes it shows?
Any way, I will perform commit to see....
Qian
Message was edited by:
QianChen

"Master Line" query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for