Material provided by customer

Hi Gurus,
My client is processing the raw material which is provided by customer and also the same raw material is been procured by client.Now he wants to differentiate between customer & self procured material due to price diff. He does not want two diff. no. for the same material. I have gone through various links in SDN but no suitable solution have been found. And also how to generate requirement for customer provided material.
Regards,
Deven

Hi! Devendra,
You should receive customer supplied material against the sales order with movement 501(if you don't want to valuate the material in your inventory). System will show that material separately as customer stock. If you want to show that material in your inventory but want to valuate it separately then you will have to use split valuation as was suggested earlier.
I suppose this will help you in resolving the issue.
Regards,
Uday

Similar Messages

  • Material Provided by Customer table MKUB

    There is a table in SAP "MKUB Material Provided by Customer"
    My question is how is this table used?
    We currently manage material that our customer owns and have not yet found a good process.
    If there is a standard SAP process it would be great.
    Thanks in advance
    Brad

    PK
    Thanks for the additional information.
    However a 501 E movement does not update table MKUB.
    The reason I am asking about MKUB is because usually if a table has been created by SAP there is a process in place that uses the table. Just by the name of the table " Material Provided by Customer" it indicates to me that there may be a standard SAP process for what I am trying to accomplish.
    The 501 E mvt requires that I sell the material back to the customer using the same sales order that was used to bring the material into stock.
    What we need is the ability to bring in material owned by the customer, have it identified in SAP as owned by that customer, and be able to ship the material out to the customer as new orders are created.
    In this case we are acting as a 3PL warehouse for the customer.
    Any additional thoughts or suggestions would be great.
    Thanks
    Brad

  • Defining material provided by customer

    Dear All
    I have a problem in defining "Material Provided by Customer".I have created a matl of type"UNBW" .Further  I have included this matl in the BOM of another FERT matl.On the item tab of BOM I have choosen the matl under ref.Then in the "STATUS and LONG TEXT" tab page
    under the "FURTHER DATA " box when i choose the matl provision indicator and choose the code matl provided by Customer system is accepting.But after MRP run system is not showing anything about the customer matl.
    When I went back to BOM and checked the box for matl Provision in F1 it shows that the "INDICATOR IS NOT ACTIVE FOR THE CUSTOMER SUPPLIED MATL.
    What could be wrong.We are using SAP ECC 5.0
    With best regards
    Suryanarayana tata

    Hi Surya,
    Create the Sales Order with sales BoM. Then do GR for others and select the Movement type 501 (without PO) and special stock as E (Sales order) usually known as 501E Movement type. Mention the sales order and item no mentioned in Sales Order for which you want to receive.
    Receive the material and do the production.
    Hope it will be useful. Kindly mention if so.
    Regards,
    Elanchezhian. K.C.

  • Material provided by customer - subcontracting process

    Hi All,
    In our scenario our customer is subcontracting some assembly work to us. The material to be assembled in provided by the customer completely. It is always in the ownership of the customer even when it is lying at our end.
    Is there a standard process in SAP to map this scenario? How can we check the customer stock lying in our SAP system at our end?
    Regards,
    V S

    Hi,
    If you want to track these materials and stock than you will have to create them as non-valuated materials in your system and take GRs when customer sends you these materials. You may take it as un-restricted stock, Sales Order Stock or Customer Stock based on your requirements.
    As material is non-valuated it will not create any liability in your system.
    Than, use this materials in BOMs for your production order and create a Sales order for the final product.
    Regards,
    Dakshesh

  • MRP4 view exclude storage location & material provided by vendor/customer..

    Hi
    Could anyone please tell me in MRP4 view for a material,where is the option so that i can exclude or include the storage location stock from MRP?
    and also in which T code i should indicate the material is provided by vendor/material provided by customer?In CS01wher's this option?
    Please help me
    Thanks & regards
    Raj

    Hi Karthik,
    MRP area is nothing to do with storage locations settings in MRP4 view. If you want to activate MRP area and use the MRP run at MRP area level then you have to customized MRP area either at storage location level or sub-contractor level (in MRP master data settings )... then you need to assign this MRP1 view of the material and with valid MRP type.  Now when you run the MRP then planning will be carried out at this MRP area for this part.
    With storage location indicators in MRP4 view (must enter with putting the stoarge location values from MM02/MM03) you can exclude the stock of this storage location (indicator 1) in the palnning run or you can plan seperately with indicator2 with using re-order level. Here no need of MRP area.
    If helps rewards points.
    Regards
    TAJUDDIN

  • Tracking of parts provide by customer

    We have cases where customers provide parts and components, we provide assembler services to make a product for the customer.
    We want to track the inventory of these parts and componets that provided by customer(belong to customer), tracking the receiving date and quantity balances. How to do it, what movement or material to use?

    Hi,
    This is reverse subcontracting (when you are the subcontractor) if I understand properly your question.
    One possible solution is to set quantity update but no value update for the material type in your valuation area (SPRO > Logistics - General > Material Master > Basic Settings > Material Types > Define Attributes of Material Types) - this is necessary because the ownership of the goods won't change (the goods are owned by your customer).
    As for receiveing goods you can use FOC PO or mvt 501 or 511.
    (if you have the physically same part as your property, you can use split valuation instead of non-value-updated material type. In this case for one valuation type you have to use 0 valuation price).
    Regards,
    Csaba
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Sep 1, 2009 6:45 AM

  • Using Federated Security in BizTalk against custom Token Provider and Custom Token

    Hi,
    I as the topic states, I'm trying to get BizTalk to use a Custom Token Provider with custom tokens.
    So I thought this would be rather painless using ws2007FederationHttpBinding but got stuck. The problem is that the service expect soap action and a special structure (se example):
    Request:
    <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:wsc="common.namespace" xmlns:ws="securitytoken.namespace">
       <soapenv:Header>
          <wsc:AutHeader>      
    Containing Custom Auth header information tags, about 20 or so
          </wsc:AutHeader>
       </soapenv:Header>
       <soapenv:Body>
          <ws:SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0InputArgs>
             <ws:SecurityTokenCreateRequest>
                <ws:securityToken><!-- signed SAML assertion --></ws:securityToken>
             </ws:SecurityTokenCreateRequest>
          </ws:SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0InputArgs>
       </soapenv:Body>
    </soapenv:Envelope>
    Response:
    <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
    <soap:Body>
    <SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0OutputArgs xmlns:ns2="common.namespace" xmlns="tokenservice,namespace">
    <SecurityTokenCreateResponse>
    <securityToken> <!-- THE Custom TOKEN --> </securityToken>
    </SecurityTokenCreateResponse>
    <ResponseState>
    <ns2:ErrorCode>0</ns2:ErrorCode>
    <ns2:Severity>0</ns2:Severity>
    <ns2:ComponentId>201</ns2:ComponentId>
    <ns2:StrErrorCode xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:nil="true" />
    <ns2:Message>OK</ns2:Message>
    <ns2:NativeError xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:nil="true" />
    <ns2:LogSequence xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:nil="true" />
    </ResponseState>
    </SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0OutputArgs>
    </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>
    Error Message in BizTalk, when I send message via ws2007FederationHTTPBinding to the SOAP service, as expected the soap structure dosent match the expected one from the server, most obvisly is the missing SOAP action and incorrect BODY element.
    System.ServiceModel.ProtocolException: The content type text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 of the response message does not match the content type of the binding (application/soap+xml; charset=utf-8). If using a custom encoder, be sure that the IsContentTypeSupported method is implemented properly. The first 521 bytes of the response were: '<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
    <soap:Body>
    <soap:Fault>
    <soap:Code>
    <soap:Value>Server</soap:Value>
    </soap:Code>
    <soap:Reason>
    <!--1 or more repetitions:-->
    <soap:Text xml:lang="en">Missing operation for soapAction [null] and body element [{http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512}RequestSecurityToken] with SOAP Version [SOAP 1.2]</soap:Text>
    </soap:Reason>
    </soap:Fault>
    </soap:Body>
    </soap:Envelope>'. ---> System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error.
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()
    at System.Servi
    My plan to solve this is to try using beahviors added to the "inner" wcf binding that will help reconstruct the message from the standard form that I has, but I'm a bit vorried that I start to solve this and later on I'll have to add custom handling
    for token extraction and handling since the token should be placed in a custom header in the soap envelope with custom namespace =).
    So my question is, could this be solved via sw2007FederationHttpBinding or is an orchestration and some custom code for signing the path forward?
    Thanks in advance for any help or guidance!
    /Mattias

    It's a little tough to use sw2007FederationHttpBinding, I faced similar situation before. :(

  • EE is committed to providing excellent "Customer Service"

    I act on behalf of the account holder, my sister Ms Katharine ***** who is unable to deal with the account due to being registered with mental illness. She has difficulty processing too much information and at times back ground noise and general conversation can confuse her. Therefore things like dealing with bills and accounts, filing in forms and understanding what is happening around her, can be difficult. With this in mind I act on her behalf for all her accounts, mobile, broadband, Tv, Gas Electric etc.
    She has been an EE customer for 20 months now and only has a rolling one month Mobile Broadband account with EE. She is not a phone customer.
    I raised a complaint against a member of staff Ms ****** ***** because she contacted me to appologise for another member of staff who implied they didn't need to deal with me as I wasn't the account holder even though I am named on the account and have only ever been the person who deals with the account. After appologising for that member of staff Ms ***** then proceeded to fabricate details concerning the account and make things up on the telephone as the call proceeded. Bearing in mind she is calling me from the "customer relations" department and has all the time in the world to check the account, confirm accurate details and then call me in her own time, I saw no reason for her to "wing it" and make it up as she went along. I asked her twice if she had checked the account details before calling me and I was twice given the response "thats irrelivant". She clearly wantd to avoid answering that reasonable question. I could clearly tell she had not checked the account and this made the situation more complicated and worse. This was dissapointing considering she was supposed to be calling to resolve an issue and was a representative from the Customer Relations department. Several things she stated during the call did not ring true and it was clear she had called unprepared and was fabricating certain things or making them up as she went along. On this basis I called EE back after she hung up with the intent to raise a complaint against her as I felt Customer Relations should be resolving issues, not making them worse.
    Initially when calling EE on Wednesday the 1st July 2015 and speaking to customer services in Darlington, I was told I would be put through to Customer Relations and speak to Ms ****** *****s manager Ms ****** *********.
    After explaining that I wished to raise a complaint, I was put on hold while awaiting transfer to the Customer Relations department. On that day alone I was on the phone for 2hours and 34minutes mostly on hold and being transfered between the departments of Darlington, South Wales, New Delhi and North Tyne. I never got through to customer relations. Eventually I was told by a Manager in North Tyne that they would get through to Customer Relations for me and then call me back that day, to save me being on hold any longer. The call back from EE never happened that day. Something I expected as I had been told this four times in the past over the last 20 months and those call backs never happend either. I chased the matter up the following day on Thursday the 2nd of July and that day I spent 2 hours and 17 minutes on the phone. Again mostly on hold or being transfered between departments. Again I was promised a callback later that day and again that never happened that day. An email was sent to the Customer relations department requesting that they contact me directly. I did get through to the "Complaints Escalation" department but they refused to transfer me to the Customer Resolutions department even though thats where three previous staff members said they were transfering me and even confirmed the name of the Manager of that department so there is no confsuion. Needless to say I refused the offer off the call back that hadn't happened on the two previous days or on the four other occassions in the past 20 months. And to be clear I was told that someone would call me back "today".
    On Friday the 3rd of July I called again as I had received no reply and spent just over 1hour and 10minutes on the phone. This time I spoke to a lovely Lady called R*** M*** in South Wales and she was extremely polite and genuine which was refreshing and completely unEE like. Although she was unable to help due to the way in which EE set up its complaints system, she was very considerate and understanding of my frustration after 6 hours on the phone over 3 days and still getting nowhere.
    On Wednesday the 8th July I received a call back from the original department I was supposed to be put through to (Customer Relations) and spoke to the Manager ******* ******** who was quick to point out that she had "just received the email" sent on Thursday the 2nd of July and was pressing in getting accross her point that she had replied quickly to the email knowing the call was recorded.
    The call lasted 30 minutes and I felt from the moment she called, her aim was about resolving the issue with the intent of "closing the complaint" by offering money or requesting "what I would like" as a resolution. I clearly stated the experiences I had over the past three days to raise a complaint and the just over 6 hours on the phone to EE. Again the focus seemed to be to get to the end of the call and close the complaint via an obvious cash offer. On numerous occasions she seemed to want to lead the conversation in that direction yet showed little interest in the actual complaint. It wasn't until I asked her to accomplish what she had initially called me about, namely to listen to my complaint, that she stopped talking and actually listened. Prior to her call three managers, 2 in North Tyne and 1 in Greenoch near Glasgow all stated that the original call I received "would be listened to" and checked for the things I stated in the complaint. Unsurprisingly, when I asked at the end of Ms *******s call, what she made of the conversation when she listned to it, she told me she hadn't listened to it and was unable to, contradicting the three other managers.
    When raising the complaint with ****** in North Tyne, he informed me he was taking the matter seriously and was going to raise an internal complaint as per protocal and the Ombudsmans guidelines. I spent just under 15 minutes talking with him. At the end of that call, after he asked "is there anything else I can help you with today", I asked him what the complaint was about. He couldn't tell me and started to list things he was trying to remember from the conversation but none were the actual thing I brought to his attention in the first place. Therefore, how do you take the matter seriously and raise an internal complaint if you can't remember what it is? I seriously doubt that these "internally raised complaints" actually happen and it is convenient just to say they do so that the customer can then be told "but we can't discuss the results with you due to privacy and work environment practices".
    I spoke to New Delhi twice while being passed from pilar to post and the line was very bad when being transfered from North Tyne and New Delhi offered to call me back. I explained to the first chap that he couldn't call a mobile broadband device as it is not a phone but the guy persisted and needless to say I received no call back. Ten minutes later, exactly the same situation and this time the chap asked for my mobile number. I gave it to him and he replied "thats not an EE number, sorry I can't help you". He then asked me why I was calling if that wasn't an EE number. I explained the account concerned a mobile broadband device and he said again, "Sorry I can't help you" and terminated the call.
    Also while trying to raise the complaint I was told twice that I wasn't the customer. Obviously some people may need the assistance of a carer, social worker, community nurse or family member to help them. This is lost on EE. When they don't know how to handle a complaint, or their hands are tied by interanl system structure or they get caught lying, they resort to the tactic of asking to speak to the account holder or telling me I am not the account holder.
    I have also been told on three occasions that I was being transfered to a department that I could not be transfered to. Two managers later told me I should not have been told this and that it is impossible to transfer me to that department. There were numerous other things that happened during the 6 hours on the phone to EE. If I put them in this statement, you wouldn't believe me and think I was making it up. Then again, this EE and I have read some of the other statements on here.... and they don't suprise me either.
    I was offered £10 on the account for my time on the phone by a manager. By that point I really didn't care at all or bother to wuestion if it had actually been put on the account. I declined any credit or cash offer from Ms ******* ***** in her call back as I felt the service was so appauling and the structure of making a complaint to lengthy and unreasonable. I didn't wish to be just another complaint "satisfactorily deal with" by being "paid off". I have also experienced such customer service in the past and was offered a £10 goodwill gesture. It is clear to me that EE resolve complaints and internal issues by paying off customers (they call it resolving issues), rather than properly handling complaints and taking them seriously. EEs complaints system is "designed" to be difficult to raise a complaint or raise it to another level. Something the Ombudsman brought to their attention in the recent fine they gave to EE. Clearly EE wouldn't have so many complaints if it provided a customer service that was fair and easy to use and had little to complain about in the first place. Even during the call back I was told that Vodaphone was most complained about company, yet the statistics from the Ombudsman for 2015 clearly show that EE has received the most complains concerning Broadband. The thing I was calling about. Even during a callback to resolve an issue, EE still were trying say someone else was worse and deflect attention.
    I was very, very happy to see the £1 million pound fine they received from the Ombudsman on Friday. Before I am insulted by any more EE staff memebers, who tell me I have the right to leave at any time, as happened twice while raising the complaint, I'd like to point out that I am happy with the product and the price I pay for it. The Product isn't the problem. It's the Customer Service.
    Just because I am happy with the product, it doesn't mean I forfeit my right to complain about reasonable issues. In short I feel, TalkTalk are just inept and a bit clueless whereas Everything Everywhere and deceitful and intentionally pervasive when handling complaints. I also feel that the actual amount of complaints may be far higher than the statistics show and that customers give up complaining when being left on hold for so long or realising the complaints procedure is worthless and too difficult to use. This then keeps the amount of complaints lower than they actually are.
    The service I received trying to raise a reasonable complaint was atrocious and in My personal view, clearly reflects why so many EE customers complain about the company and the Ombudsman fined it so heavily. Clearly they have not learnt their lesson, despite their statement on Friday that that fine was for past issues. I would happily see EEs licence to opperate removed or atleast brought in to question based on this and other customers experiences. If you have a complaint, don't let EE tell you, "its only you" or "its just your opinion". It isn't.... And the Ombudsman says so.
    This was easily the worse Customer Service experience I have ever had in my life.
    8th July 2015

    Hi ,
    I am very sorry for all the problems you have stated in the post.
    Can you advise me what the query was? I will try help as best I can.
    Thanks.

  • How to create a Platinum,Gold and Silver Customer and how to set different price for a single material based on customer?

    Hi All,
    How to create a Platinum,Gold and Silver Customer and how to set different price for a single material based on customer?
    Assume Material is Pen.
    While creating Sales Order in VA01 how to bring different price for the same material for Platinum,Gold and Silver Customers.
    Kindly help me out.
    Thanks,
    Renjith Jose

    A good place to start is http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/javatips/jw-javatip34.html
    Also, do a search in this forum on HttpURLConnection. That class allows you to use POST method to send form data to a web server.
    "Hidden" variables are only hidden in HTML. The HTTP that gets POSTed to the web server doesn't distinguish between hidden and not hidden. That is, the content you would write to the HttpURLConnection.getOutputStream() would be something like:
    hidden=1&submit=ok(Of course, the variable names would depend on what the web server was expecting from the form.)
    Also, be sure to set the Content-Type request parameter to "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"

  • How to clear the stock of material provided to vendor(subcontracting stock)

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    Please let me know how to clear the stock of material provided to vendor(subcontracting stock) and need your help in what senario this stock will show in " Matl prov. to vendor "
    Thanks and Regards,
    SHARAN.

    Hi Sharan,
    Matl Povided to Vendor stock will appear in Subcontracting scenario.
    If at all you have given some material to a subcontractor , this will be consumed automaticaly when you will recieve the ordered material from subcontractor.that is 543 movement will take place in the backgroung when u do the GR.
    In case if u need to clear the stock u can do 542 and take the stock back to unrestricted.
    Edited by: Donsandy on Jan 21, 2009 6:19 PM

  • MDM 5.5 Material, Vendor, Employee & Customer Repositories

    Hi,
    MDM 5.5 comes with object repositories for Material, Vendor, Employee & Customer. Can anyone help me in finding a way to synchronize these with R/3 ?
    I am able to see Corresponding IDoc names as data sources in Import Manager for these repositories. But, my question is, what are the steps required for synchronizing with R/3 so that I can import/export these data from/to R/3.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Rajani Kumar K

    look at this doc:
    MDME 5.5 - ConfigGuide - MD Consolidation & MD Harmonization
    at  Quick Link:/nw04installation
    Kevin

  • How to issue the non stock material to the customer place through delivery?

    Dear All,
                I have created a service order with one operation,and for executing the operation i need one spares material which should be sent to the customer place.So i put that as non stock item in the line item of the order.
    Result : It Creates PR with account assignment and with reference to the PR i craeate a PO with the same account assignment order.
    Now when i take MIGO against the PO,it is directly consumed to the order,wherein i have to send that material to the customer place and then consume.
    How can i handle this process.
    Regards,
    Venugopal

    Hi,
    The material which u sending to Customer place mark those item as return in Purchase order and then do Goods movement by 161. If that material is non val. then No Accounting will generate.
    Vikramraj

  • Latest (most recent ) price of material for a customer in the report.

    Hi,
    I need to create a query where I need to show latest(most recent ) price of the material of a customer based on condition types. I need to show latest price of the material for the customer. can some one please tell me how to show this latest(most recent ) price in the report.
    Kindly respond.

    That is ok but i want only one record be considered for reporting, not all records resulting into avarage.

  • GR to "Material provided to vendor" stock from PO

    Hi
    I need to Post stock directly to "Material provided to vendor"
    Stock while doing GR with reference to Purchase order and
    I activated QM view for the material. So, I entered vendor no in the PO and select SC indicator also. While doing GR with
    reference to PO, stock also increased in Quality inspection stock of Material provided to vendor. Now my problem is
    there is no inspection lot was generated. I want to create
    inspection lot. Is it Possible ? if no, pl clarify.
    Thanx in advance,
    Regards,
    RRS.

    Hi,
    Try with following,
    Assign QM Active to movenent Type 101- O, then maintain Quality infor record- Insp. Control- Source inspection Key ( Take help frm u r QM Consultant)
    Rgds,
    Vikas

  • HOW CAN I GET MATERIAL MOVEMENTS BY CUSTOMER

    Hi
    I need to check ship to customer to see if its had any material movements on it for a given peroid for customer obsolescence programme
    All reports I can find bomb out, which table will give me material movments with customer number?
    I just want to input the customer number and see if there have been any movements on those accounts for a set period of time
    Thanks to advise
    Jo

    Hi,
    Drill out the deliveries for the customer for particular period from standard delivery tables.
    Then input the deliveries in the VBFA table and fetch out the material documents with subsequent document category "R"
    When you get the material document and year.Then input the same in MSEG table and you can find the respective movements done for the customer.
    regards,
    Saju,S

Maybe you are looking for