Material Value Variance compare to MM & GL

Dear Gurus,
When i am running MB5L, Systme showing Stock balance, Acc balance and variances.
can anybody tell me y variance are coming.........any possible reasons to this.
Thanx inadvance.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi Venkat
Please see the documentation on the transaction code MB5L also. It will tell you more on the same.
Variances can occur due to:
1. You have entered postings to the stock account manually.
2. The stock account includes not only stock postings, but also other postings. In this case, you should check the account determination in the Customizing for Valuation and Account Assignment. Make sure that the stock accounts are used solely for the transaction key BSX (stock postings).Check Account Determination
3. The account assignment for the stock accounts (transaction key BSX) was changed during productive operation; the respective stocks, however, were not deducted from the old account (movement type 562) and posted to the new one (movement type 561).
The help on the transaction code will help you understand more on the report.Please award points if you found this helpful.
Regards,
Karthik

Similar Messages

Error 06206: Effective price lower than material price (variance 30.00 %)

Hello Experts,
I've maintained the tolerance limit as 30% for my company code and tolerance key 'PE'.
Even though I try to create a Purchase Order with the same effective price as the material price (no variance), still it gives me the following error:
"Effective price lower than material price (variance > 30.00 %) Message no. 06206"
However, I get this error only for Import vendors and not for Domestic vendors.
I'm using same currency (INR) in Purchase Order for Import vendor as for Domestic vendor.
I've debugged the code to find where exactly and why it throws that error but have been unsuccessful. When I reach METHOD pbo_finished, deep structure my_pushed_message already has the error message ID 06 and number 206 stored in it.
Seeking Experts' help!
BR//
Anish

since you are getting effective price lower than material price, your PO appears to be at a lower value. This may be since the total is not carried to the appropriate field. pl check whether Subtotal column is having S entry
if its an error, in attributes of system messages change to warning

Debugging of Material usage Variance

Hi All,
We have a Z report for Monthly Material Usage Variance for reporting.
The SAP Material Variance report is not calculating the Material Usage Variance Quantity & Value correctly for production order that have a target quantity and actual quantity that are equal to each other. In this case, the MUV quantity should be equal to 0. Instead a MUV Quantity is calculated and this results in a MUV value being calculated.
I would like to do the debugging.
I am new to SAP ABAP. Kindly, explain me what steps should I take to proceed.
Please give your suggestions.
Quick response will be appreciated <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Thanks & Regards
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 4, 2008 5:48 PM

Hi Venkat & Amiya,
Thanks for your quick response.
I am not able to execute the report right now, as this is a month end report and executed in background on the month end only (on 30th or 31st of every month).
Kindly, let me know, is there any other way to find the bug in the program in this scenario or is there any way to execute the report in between periods.
Quick response will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards.

Monthly Material Usage Variance

Hi All,
We have a Z report for Monthly Material Usage Variance for reporting.
The SAP Material Variance report is not calculating the Material Usage Variance Quantity & Value correctly for production order that have a target quantity and actual quantity that are equal to each other. In this case, the MUV quantity should be equal to 0. Instead a MUV Quantity is calculated and this results in a MUV value being calculated.
Please give your suggestions.
Quick response will be appreciated & points will be assigned.
Thanks & Regards

Hi Venkat & Amiya,
Thanks for your quick response.
I am not able to execute the report right now, as this is a month end report and executed in background on the month end only (on 30th or 31st of every month).
Kindly, let me know, is there any other way to find the bug in the program in this scenario or is there any way to execute the report in between periods.
Quick response will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards.

Use a single variable value to compare with 2 characteristics

Hi guys
    I need some advice on how to use a single variable value to compare with 2 characteristics in a Infocube.
eg : I hv 2 characteristics in Infocube
       Launch date & Closing Date
   Now I want to display report where the variable date (inputted by user) is equal to Launch Date and Closing Date.
    with regards

Bobby,
if I right understood your situation, you have an input variable ZINPUT (related to a date 'A') and 2 others dates (yours Launch and Closing dates, 'B' and 'C').
You want to display only the rows where A(user input)=B=C.
Now you have to create 2 new variables (called ZB and ZC, related to B and C dates) NOT marked as 'ready for input' and set to 'mandatory variable entry'.
Call Transaction CMOD for the definition of the customer exit (if not already existing!).
Create a new project, maintain the short text, and assign a development class.
Goto Enhancements Assignments and assign RSR00001. Press the button components to continue.
Double-click on EXIT_SAPLRRS0_001. For documentation place the cursor on RSR00001 and use the menu Goto -> Display documentation.
Then double-click on ZXRSRU01. If the include doesnt exist you have to create it; assign a development class and a transport request.
Enter the coding:
DATA: L_S_RANGE TYPE RSR_S_RANGESID.
DATA: LOC_VAR_RANGE LIKE RRRANGEEXIT.
CASE I_VNAM.
WHEN 'ZB'.
(and you have to repeate the same code also for the variable 'ZC' !)
IF I_STEP = 2.
READ TABLE I_T_VAR_RANGE INTO LOC_VAR_RANGE
WITH KEY vnam = 'ZINPUT'.
if sy-subrc = 0.
L_S_RANGE-LOW = LOC_VAR_RANGE-LOW.
endif.
L_S_RANGE-sign = 'I'.
L_S_RANGE-opt = 'EQ'.
append L_S_RANGE to e_t_range.
ENDIF.
ENDCASE.
Save and activate the coding and the project.
Now go to your query and use these two new variables to restrict B and C....et voilà !!!
Let me know if you need more help (and please assign points !!! be generous !!!)
Bye,
Roberto

Reducing the Freight cost on material value for undelivered material

Hi Experts,
Summary : The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material. The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded. The details scenario is mentioned below :-
We have to make a Purchase Order with material code say ABC for procured of some material. Suppose we make a Purchase Order for 100 nos. at a Unit Price of Say Rs. 10/- for Material Code ABC on say Vendor M/s XYZ. A freight condition is maintained in the Conditions Tab and suppose the Freight is Rs. 10 per unit of the material.
While preparing the Goods Receipt through MIGO, in the Freight Tab we select say freight vendor say M/s PQR against the freight condition and post the goods receipt.
While doing Invoice Processing in MIRO, when we enter the combination of Purchase Order and Planned Delivery Cost the system will populate the vendor codes of both the supplier of material and the transporter. On selecting the transporter the freight amount will populate against which the invoice of the tranporter can be processed.
In the Vendor Master of M/s XYZ GR-Based Invoice Verification is activated.
The vendor is allowed an under tolerance of 0.5% (i.e. the vendor should deliver at least 99.50 nos. of the Purchase Order). If the vendor delivers 99.50 or more then there will be no deduction in the freight charges.
But suppose the vendor delivers only 99.4 nos. of the quantity. Then we will prepare the GRIR for 99.4 nos.only. But while processing the MIRO we need to deduct 1.5 times the value of the material from the freight amount for the shortshipped quantity, i.e.
0.1 no (99.5 u2013 99.4) X Rs. 10/- * 1.5 = Rs. 1.5 are to be deducted from the final payment from the freight amount of the transporter.
The material supplier will have to be paid in full 100 nos. of quantity and will raise an invoice for 100 nos. A dummy GRIR for the 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will have to be prepared for processing the invoice for the 100 nos. of the material supplier and a dummy issue for 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will be prepared to remove them from the system.
Hence the freight cost for this 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will also go into the cost of the material and increase the MAP by that amount. Also the goods issue Cost will also have the effect of the freight cost.
We do not want to load the freight cost for the undelivered material in the value of the material.
Can any one please suggest a solution for the same.
Thanks in advance.
AJ.

Hi
A PO Will be raised for full quantity of material say 100 nos.
The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material.
A freight vendor is maintained at the time of GR for material against the freight condition maintained in the Po.
The freight vendor facilitates the delivery of the material from the vendor to the purchaser for which he is given an under tolerance limit of 0.5%. Any delivery below this tolerance limit, freight amount to the effect of 1.5 times the per unit rate of material x short fall below 0.5% tolerance will be deducted from the freight amount.
A dummy grir will have to be prepared for the short delivered quantity for processing the invoice for the full quantity of the purchase order, as the vendor is going to raise the invoice for full purchase order quantity. The client does not want to load the freight cost of the undelivered quantity on the material value as it will wrongly show the MAP of the material. This shortshipped material will be issued to remove it from the system and the stock will remain for the delivered quantity only. The vendor is subject to gr based invoice verification.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks in advance.
AJ
The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded.

Dist. of Header Condition based on the material Value

Hi All,
I have one query regarding the header Condition.i have selected the Calculation type as B - fixed amount (mandatory) for a particular Condition type and also selected the header and Item condition indicator.Now if the material have more than one line item then the system distributes this condition based on the quantities in PO.
My client requirement is that they want to have a header condition as we are using now. But they want to distribute this header condition according to the material values for each line items in a PO. please Mention that this condition is a fixed value (mandatory).
So, how can we make a Fixed Value (Calculation type) for a header condition to be distributed among the line items based on the base Value?
Please revert back asap.
Sure, points will be awarded for the same.

as explained earlier ,
system is distributes the header amount on the basic of value calculated by Basic X qty
e.g.
header value =100
two line item
1 is with Rs 4/- and qty is 10
2 is with Rs 10/- and qty is 15
so distribution is
Rs 21.05/- for 1st item
and
Rs 78.94/- for 2ed item
regards,
sujit

Material Usage Variance

Hi Experts
Can somebody tell me how to see material usage variance in sap?
regards,
Sohel

Hi
1. for a particular order, use T code KKBC_ORD... Or you can also see in CO03 (for prod order) or COR3 (for process order)
You can change the layout and plug in columns like Price var, Usage Var, etc
Then you can see each category of variance per material...
2. If you want to see for group of production orders, then use T code KKBC_HOE.. For this you need to do some IMG settings to maintain summarization hierarchies
Regards
Ajay M

How to view the Material Value Involved in the WIP Closing Balance Report

We are able to see the Itemwise WIP Closing Value using KKAQ.
We have one requirement that to know the Material Value & Quantity Involved in the WIP Closing Balance Summary.
How to fetch the information for Material Value , Process Value With Quantity on Itemwise from WIP Closing Balance.?
Thanks in Advance
Regards
K.Natarajan

Dear Premkumar,
Thankx for your reply. But when we execute the T-Code KKBC_PKO for an Item, It is giving an error like "No product cost collector exist for material/plan/prod.process <Matl.COde>"
How to see this report.
Regards
K.Natarajan

Service cost to be included into Material value.

Dear Expert,
1. Purchase order has been created for "XXX" material - Value of 1000 - Quantity 10, GRN & Invoice has been booked.
Now my material valuation price is 1000 * 10 = 10000
2. Service PO has been raised to make alteration in same "XXX" material, the cost incurred has to be booked for that particular Material "XXX" only.
Two vendors are different.
Kindly advise
Regards,
Mohan

Hi,
As your initial material is XXX with amount 1000 now your doing the alteration on this if you want to keep the same material code, follow the subcontract process as said by shiva, create subcontract PO for XXX add the same materail in BOM componenet , do the complete cycle add the alteration charges in the PO then when you will make the GR agaianst subcontract PO the new valuation will be
1000 + alteration chrages for each.
regards,
zafar

Material value report (Scrap)

Hi All,
Pls let me know std reports available in SAP of material valuation,like value of receipts,Issues and Issue to scrap.
my basic requirement to know the scrap value of perticular material which is issued to Scrap
Regards
Raj

You can Use MB5B.
Give the material number and period of interest and execute. You will get the current stock value of the material, value of receipts and value of issues.
But if you want to know the values of certain transactions only (value of material for the particular transaction when it is scrapped using mov type 551, 553, 555, then develop custom reports using the accounting documents generated in that transaction.
Or write a query using SQVI

How to update a column value by comparing old value by using DML Handler...

Hi Can anyone post the DML Handler code for updating a column value by comparing the old value.
Thanks,
Ray

Hi,
Here is an example of a DML handler.
BEGIN
DBMS_APPLY_ADM.SET_DML_HANDLER(
object_name => 'scott.emp',
object_type => 'TABLE',
operation_name => 'UPDATE',
error_handler => false,
user_procedure => 'strmadmin.update_column',
apply_database_link => NULL,
apply_name => 'MY_APPLY');
END;
This DML handler which will send any LCR matching the specified conditions to the strmadmin.update_column for customised processing.
You can write the strmadmin.update_column procedure so that it extracts the old values from the LCR. You can then use the old values from the LCR to identify the row in the table. Once you identify the row, you can update it as you want.
I haven't really tried to do any customised processing using DML handlers, but this should work.
Hope this is of help.
Sujoy

Manually adjusted G/L and Material values in MIRO document

Dear All,
Can you please help me get the logic of capturing data from RBCO and RBMA for manually adjusted entries. I have a Purchase Register, which is completely based on the MIRO documents. The values are picked up from RSEG and RBKP. Header-wise and item-wise details are also displayed in the register.
Since manual adjustments are done, the values are not saved in RSEG Table. The total value is reflected in the RBKP - Header table. How do I get the value bifurcation?
The values are there in BSET table also. But I fetch the values with respect to the tax codes and condition types from BSET. Accounting values are fetched from BSET in the existing register.
According to the current logic, the adjusted values are not populated to the Purchase Register.
How to display the values in item-wise and header-wise?
Please help me get a logic of getting the values from RBCO and RBMA or from BSET.
I prefer to get the values populated from BSET, because we will get the tax values also.
Thanks,
Haritha

Hello , there are two tabs next to "Po reference" tab called "G/L Account" & "Material" tabs which can be used for G/L Accounts & material entering.
if you don't have these tabs , please check for authorization.
below screenshot for reference.
thanks

Batch wise material value

i wanted to see batch wise material's op stock, closing stock, receipt value, issue value (qty wise and value wise), then which report we can consider. i am looking mb5b but in this either batch is appearing or value is appearing, but batch, value both are not coming in one screen

u can c only a limited information for the batch.
if u want all these infrmation, then a report has to be developed thru ABAP development

Non Cenvatable material - Value not matching in MIGO and MIRO

Dear SAP experts!
We have the following problem.
We are using TAXINN.
We create a Purchase Order for a raw material, which is non cenvatable for a particular vendor.
When we carry out Goods Receipt, we change the Material type from Raw Material to Non Cenvatable in the Material Type in the Excise Item Tab and post the BED and AED values, the values are getting inventorized correctly.
And MIRO posting is also happening correctly. Both, MIGO and MIRO values are tallying. i.e, The total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, if we change any of the BED or AED value at the time of posting GR in the excise Invoice tab, then we are facing problem.
Value during MIGO posting is correct. That is the total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, During MIRO posting, the value of BED and AED is not getting picked.
The value during MIRO shows only Basic Price+CST and not BED amount and AED amount.
Can any one tell me, where it is going wrong.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Muthuraman.K

you have to used non deductable condition type in Taxinn to post tax to inventory
that is
JMIP IN: BED inventory % say 8%
JAIP IN AED inventory % Say 4 %
JMX2     IN: A/P BED inventor 100 %
JAX2     IN: A/P AED inventor 100%
and the above condition should be assigned to proper Classify Condition Types
TAXINN     JMIP     BEDINVENTP BED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JAIP     AEDINVENTP AED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JMX2     BEDINVENTT BED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JAX2     AEDINVENTT AED Inventory Total
And also u will have to assign condition type JMX2 and JAX2 in Maintain Excise Defaults
this will solve your issue

Material Value Variance compare to MM & GL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for