MCSI cofiguration for Material Part wise Analysis

Dear SAP Gurus,
A requirement has been generated by Client regarding various  sales & material Analysis  (Date, Month, Material, Part & customer wise) and i know LIS  and * SIS*  is good tool for that.
Request u to all please provide complete Config. and Brief conceptual note on  MCSI
Regards
Gaurav

Hi,
Check Note 173756 - Collective note: SIS variant configuration.
Regards,
Eduardo

Similar Messages

  • Opening for material vendor wise

    Hi all..
    I need opening for material by vendor wise. from  which table I get it??
    By MARD  and S033 i m able to get material wise opening.not vendor wise..
    Plz help me.

    solved

  • Sale Qty Material grp wise

    DearAll ,
    whr we can find total  sale Qty material grp Wise Per Month ?
    Pl guide with report
    regards

    Hi,
    Using std analysis you may find LIS reports material wise.
    For material grp wise create a std/flexible report as per your requirement.
    [LIS|http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOLIS/LOLIS.pdf]
    [LIS Components|http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/LOLIS/LOLIS_KOMPONENTEN%20DES%20LIS.pdf]
    Regards,
    Amit
    Edited by: Amit Iyer on Aug 28, 2009 12:14 AM

  • Material type wise Po ,gr value

    Hi
    Are there any standard reports available for Material type wise PO value ,gr value and invoice amount???

    Hi ,
    Then try to get data like this
    tables ->MARA->EKPO+EKKO-->EKBE.
    regards
    Prabhu

  • Need field and table for spare part material and price for a given material

    Hi,
          In need to create a report with following fields:-
           Customer           Material          spare part material            spare part description             price                   currency.
    From which table and field I can get all this information.Please guide me.
    Hint.  cl30n transaction for material managemant.
             vk13 transaction for price maintenace.
    Regards.

    CL30N is a general transaction that can be used for any classification, but material master maintenance is usually MM01/MM02 or MM41/MM42
    Material description can be taken from table MAKT
    customer from table KNA1
    The question is what you are going to analyse? where do material and customer tie together? do you do the analysis on sales orders VBAK and VBAP ? or invoices  VBRK and VBRP? or customer material info record KNMT? 
    or do you capture this info in classification? then you get the values from AUSP
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Aug 3, 2010 9:42 AM

  • Requirement for Customer Overdue Age wise Analysis

    Dear Experts,
    I do have following requirement.
    E.g.
    Cust Nam | Credit Term | Total Outstanding | Withing Cr. Period | Total O/due | Overdue Analysis (1-30, 31-60,61-90,181>)
           001    |      30 Days |     3140                 |          743              |    2398         |                                  941    819    596    42
    For each Customer had particular payment term which means that Customer has given some days before which he has to do payment then after payment is overdue.
    Total Outstanding = Oust. Withing Credit Period + Overdue Outstanding
    & overdue Analysis will give bifurcation of total overdue, from Customer Payment terms end.
    I am developing this report from Cube 0FIAR_C03
    Now I can easily get the values age wise without including any condition of payment Term.
    My Problem is How to get age wise analysis dynamically as each customer has different payment terms.
    Please help me out.
    Regards,
    Divyesh Khambhati

    Any Answers..... ????

  • Material Staging for Pick part from MF60

    Hi,
    I would like to do material staging for a Pick part from MF60.
    During staging I get the error as
    WM material staging for production order reservation not possible
    Message no. RMPU311
    Kindly can you tell me how is it possible to perform tthis action using MF60.
    Using LP10 I am able to perform this staging for pick part. But Business requires to perform if from MF60.
    Thank You

    HI,
    It is possible to do staging for pick parts using MF60.
    I am setting up this for a plant, and the existing plants are able to do staging with MF60 for Pick Parts.
    Do you know the configuration that are required for doing staging using Pull List..

  • Missing Part Info Sys for WBS element wise

    Hello Experts,
    How can i found missing list in details by giving input WBS element instead of any Material in CO24?
    or please suggest me any other way to find the list WBS elementwise.
    Thanks with regards.
    Prashant

    Hi
    In CO24 selection from reservations enter plant and WBS elements and execute the report.
    Select the Layout 000000000001 for material View
    Thanks
    S.Murali
    Edited by: S. Murali on Jul 13, 2009 4:33 PM

  • Report for material  which not consumed during C015

    HI ALL,
    "I required a report for material which material are not
    consumed at C015 production confirmation time against actual consumation (order wise , part no wise & date wise )"
    its v urgent
    good suggesstion reward with valuable points.

    Amit,
    I think your problem is that you want to monitor when users are deleting the goods issue while confirmation. So you would have to know if for a confirmation qty of 100, the planned consumption should have been 100 but the actual consuption is 50.
    So you would want to relate the confirmation qty with the planned and actual consumption.
    In COOIS Remt, qty and Withdrawal qty will show the total reqmt and actual withdrwal. Hope this will not be helpful if I understand correctly.
    You have to create a simple query joining tables AFVV with RESB. Calculate the planned consuption for the confirmation qty. This along with the actual consuption will help to give what you are looking for.
    I am right ?
    Ram

  • Standard Report for missing parts at production order operation level?

    Hi PP Gurus,
                We have standard report for missing parts at production orders level.
    For our client, they need a report for missing parts analysis at production order operation level. Do we have any such standard report in the SAP?
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Reddy.

    Hi Arvind,
          Thanks for for your response.
    1. List: Components,  Layout: Standard layout          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/withdrawn  quantity for each operation of production order. It is not showing the commit quantity.
    2. List: Components,  Layout: Pick list          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/withdrawn  quantity for each production order.
    3. List: Components,  Layout: Missing Parts List-Material View          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
    4. List: Components,  Layout: Missing Parts List-Order View          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
          We are unable to get the solution from all these 1 to 4 reports from COOIS.
    Do we have any option to change the existing layout (ex: 3 ) to get the commit quantity for operation with missing parts indicator?
    If avilable, what is the procedure to be followed?
    Thanks,
    Reddy.

  • Global Attributes to be considered for Material Master

    Hello Experts,
    I am working on Material Consolidation in MDM where in I have to consolidate the Material master from three different SAP systems in SAP MDM then harmonize the data back to each of these ECC systems. Centralization using portal will follow once this is done.
    All the mentioned ECC systems are three entirely different business working independently
    To define the enterprise data model there are two questions for which I am looking for answers based on Best practises standpoint and with your experiences in MDM projects
    Question 1: Is it a good practice to maintain Plant, Sales org, Purchase org and Classification data and other Local data in SAP MDM  Material repository for all the three ECCsystems. I understand this would unnecessarily load the repositoryu. But still looking for your experiences to explore whether there is any business benefit to do this.
    Question 2: Let's assume that we maintain only the Global attributes in SAP MDM for material repository then in that case , how do we define the material at global level. From my standpoint Material Global repository should have following fields which would uniquely define the material
    (Material Description, Base unit of Measure, Material Type, Industry Sector, Alternative Unit of Measure, Material Group)
    Is it the right approach or should I consider some other attributes as well?
    Moreover If I define these as Global Attributes then these definitions will have to imposed on the all the three ECC systems which would be a major change as all of the three have different definitions for the abovementioned attributes.
    Request your valuable inputs on what should feasible and practical best approach.
    Best Regards
    Manoj

    Hi Manoj,
    This is something which comes to every consultants mind
    See this is something very abstract and answer can vary from case to case depending on many parameters like :
    1.Client/Businessrequirement.
    2.Scenario requirement.(CMDM,Consolidation etc)
    3.System Landscape.
    4.Performance.
    5.Product capability.
    And many more.
    In my experience I have had a material scenario with only one ERP system having and only one company code.Clients requirement was to have most of the plant related data into MDM as it was a CMDM scenario.So I did take most of the views into MDM system including Location Data,Valuation data,Quality data,Classification data and Sales Data.It worked well there.
    However I was a part of another project where we had multiple ERP systems in landscape.It had multiple company codes and client wanted to keep only global data in MDM,after going into ERP system plant relevant data was populated.
    So it totally depends and one only has to take a informed decision,I would suggest you prepare a attribute analysis matrix of fields global in nature and then after understanding the relation between fields take a call on data model.
    Please go through these links for more help:
    https://websmp207.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000059312011E
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f00877e8-b8a9-2b10-d981-c7ece74917fc?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/70b0caa1-92e5-2c10-c687-a8d05e778e59
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Split valuation issue for  material batch

    Dear Expert,
        I am using batch specific valuation for semi finished material using split valuation category is "X". When creation of production order user assign component batch to  header material in goods receipt tab of production order. Every time system create valuation type for header material with proper value of header material.  But in some cases it only create batch for header material & not valuation type is created since inventory of header material show value 1 (one) rupee which is maintained in material master. I have done analysis but no conclusion is made because all configuration & material master found correct.
       Can anybody face such situation & have solution for it.
    Thanks in advance!!
    Regards,
    Shyam Ghotale

    Hi Shyam,
    What is your Price indicator for semi finished good?
    If it is S-Standard Price. Everytime GR is done Posting will be made based on Standard Price updated in Material master(thro Product Costing CK11n & CK24). So what is purpose of using batch based Split valuation if Invenotry(MAterial+Valuation type) is valued at same Price.
    Assume that you are using Moving avg Price for Semi-finished Goods
    If it is V-Moving avg Price -SAP already reconizes that there would be huge difference in valuation in production order , because of timing difference of Goods issue later than Goods receipt. This is already recomended to 'Not ' Use.
    Batch based split valuation is for Purchased part... It should not be used for Manufactured parts/Semi finished goods.
    It just provides addtional valuation , if Different purchased order has different price.
    There is no value in activating this functionality even for procured parts, if you are not going to use this information further on where each of these differently valuated batch are used.
    First ,identify what business requirement you are trying to address.
    Best R,
    Jatin

  • What are the T-codes that contain the master data for material and vendor?

    what are the T-codes that contain the master data for material and vendor?

    hi ,
    - Display Material  tcodes...
    MM01 - Create Material
    MM02 - Change Material
    MM03 - Display Material
    MM50 - List Extendable Materials
    MMBE - Stock Overview
    MMI1 - Create Operating Supplies
    MMN1 - Create Non-Stock Material
    MMS1 - Create Service
    MMU1 - Create Non-Valuated Material
    ME51N - Create Purchase Requisition
    ME52N - Change Purchase Requisition
    ME53N - Display Purchase Requisition
    ME5A - Purchase Requisitions: List Display
    ME5J - Purchase Requisitions for Project
    ME5K - Requisitions by Account Assignment
    MELB - Purch. Transactions by Tracking No.
    ME56 - Assign Source to Purch. Requisition
    ME57 - Assign and Process Requisitions
    ME58 - Ordering: Assigned Requisitions
    ME59 - Automatic Generation of POs
    ME54 - Release Purchase Requisition
    ME55 - Collective Release of Purchase Reqs.
    ME5F - Release Reminder: Purch. Requisition
    MB21 - Create Reservation
    MB22 - Change Reservation
    MB23 - Display Reservation
    MB24 - Reservations by Material
    MB25 - Reservations by Account Assignment
    MB1C - Other Goods Receipts
    MB90 - Output Processing for Mat. Documents
    MB21 - Create Reservation
    MB22 - Change Reservation
    MB23 - Display Reservation
    MB24 - Reservations by Material
    MB25 - Reservations by Account Assignment
    MBRL - Return Delivery per Mat. Document
    MB1C - Other Goods Receipts
    MB90 - Output Processing for Mat. Documents
    MB1B - Transfer Posting
    MIBC - ABC Analysis for Cycle Counting
    MI01 - Create Physical Inventory Document
    MI02 - Change Physical Inventory Document
    MI03 - Display Physical Inventory Document
    MI31 - Batch Input: Create Phys. Inv. Doc.
    MI32 - Batch Input: Block Material
    MI33 - Batch Input: Freeze Book Inv.Balance
    MICN - Btch Inpt:Ph.Inv.Docs.for Cycle Ctng
    MIK1 - Batch Input: Ph.Inv.Doc.Vendor Cons.
    MIQ1 - Batch Input: PhInvDoc. Project Stock
    MI01 - Create Physical Inventory Document
    MI02 - Change Physical Inventory Document
    MI03 - Display Physical Inventory Document
    MI31 - Batch Input: Create Phys. Inv. Doc.
    MI32 - Batch Input: Block Material
    MI33 - Batch Input: Freeze Book Inv.Balance
    MICN - Btch Inpt:Ph.Inv.Docs.for Cycle Ctng
    MIK1 - Batch Input: Ph.Inv.Doc.Vendor Cons.
    MIQ1 - Batch Input: PhInvDoc. Project Stock
    MI01 - Create Physical Inventory Document
    MI02 - Change Physical Inventory Document
    MI03 - Display Physical Inventory Document
    MI31 - Batch Input: Create Phys. Inv. Doc.
    MI32 - Batch Input: Block Material
    MI33 - Batch Input: Freeze Book Inv.Balance
    MICN - Btch Inpt:Ph.Inv.Docs.for Cycle Ctng
    MIK1 - Batch Input: Ph.Inv.Doc.Vendor Cons.
    MIQ1 - Batch Input: PhInvDoc. Project Stock
    MI21 - Print physical inventory document
    MI04 - Enter Inventory Count with Document
    MI05 - Change Inventory Count
    MI06 - Display Inventory Count
    MI09 - Enter Inventory Count w/o Document
    MI34 - Batch Input: Enter Count
    MI35 - Batch Input: Post Zero Stock Balance
    MI38 - Batch Input: Count and Differences
    MI39 - Batch Input: Document and Count
    MI40 - Batch Input: Doc., Count and Diff.
    MI08 - Create List of Differences with Doc.
    MI10 - Create List of Differences w/o Doc.
    MI20 - Print List of Differences
    MI11 - Physical Inventory Document Recount
    MI07 - Process List of Differences
    MI37 - Batch Input: Post Differences
    for vendor..
    XKN1  Display Number Ranges (Vendor)
    XK01  Create vendor (centrally)
    XK02  Change vendor (centrally)
    XK03  Display vendor (centrally)
    XK04  Vendor Changes (Centrally)
    XK05  Block Vendor (Centrally)
    XK06 Mark vendor for deletion (centrally
    XK07  Change vendor account group
    XK11  Create Condition
    XK12  Change Condition
    XK13  Display Condition
    XK14  Create with cond. ref. (cond. list)
    XK15  Create Conditions (background job)
    reward points if useful,
    venkat.

  • Best Practice for Plan for Every Part (PFEP) Database/Dashboard?

    Hello All-
    I was wondering if anyone had experience with implementing / developing a Plan for Every Part (PFEP) Database in SAP. My company is looking to migrate its existing PFEP solution (Custom developed Excel/Access system) into SAP. If you are unfamiliar, a PFEP is a dashboard view of a part/material that provides various business groups with dedicated views to data from Material Masters, Info Records, and Vendor Master Records and combines it with historical/forecasting information. The goal is to provide a single source to all the part/material settings for a given part.
    Is there a Best Practice PFEP in SAP? Or if this is something that most companies custom develop in ERP or BI?
    Thanks in advance.
    -Ron

    I think you will likely get a response in SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
    additionally you might want to do some searches based on SAP Lean Inventory, perhaps Kanban. I am assuming you are not using WM or EWM either?
    Where I have seen PFEP incorporated into the supply chain strategy this typically requires not inconsiderable additions to the alternate UoM in MM dropping of automatic replenishment levels (reorder level) and rethinking aspects of the MRP plan so be prepared or significant additional data management work if you haven't already started on that. I believe Ryder logistics uses PFEP and theirSAP infrstructure is managed by IBM; might be an idea to try and find a linkedin  resource from there. You may also find one of the ASUG supply chain,logistics,  MM or WM sigs a good place to also ask questions and look for answers.

  • SRM and MDM for material master in SRM contracts for multiple R/3

    Dear all,
    my question is:
    We are implementing SRM 4.0 in classic scenario with multiple R/3 back-end and we want to set-up Global Outline Agreements in SRM in a multi-backend environment where the Material Master are not harmonized.
    We heard that MDM and COntent Integraton can be a solution.
    Then detailled question is:
    Can we have 2 material numbers (e.g. ABC and XYZ) in 2 different R/3 systems refering the same product.
    Have the mapping done in MDM (Content Integrator?) to a third material number:123
    Replicating the material master 123 to SRM from MDM(?)
    Create global Outline Agreements in SRM for Material Master 123.
    Distribute the GOA as Outline Agreement to R/3 system 1 with the translation to ABC and to R/3 system 2 with the translation XYZ, all of that during the distribution step (or another).
    Have the call-offs quantities correct on 123 in SRM and BW?
    IF yes, how is it working, do you have some documentation discribing the scenario and the config steps to do?
    Thanks in avance

    Hello RD,
    That's a good question.
    You are on the right way. MDM is the tool for you.
    But..
    Content Integrator (CI) was first developped for Shell, to address the need of cross-referencing of material/supplier/category IDs, for:
    - reporting purpose (actual Spend Analysis)
    - mapping purpose (send of XML PO)
    CI was later "fusionned" into the new MDM (1.0) solution.
    So now, you can not order CI without MDM (even if some SRM slides still present CI).
    But mapping API where developped for all inboud/outbound interfaces in SRM, for materials only (good luck for you).
    You will find everywhere this piece of code:
      Call ECI
        CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PRODUCT_MAP'
          TABLES
            it_input          = lt_mapping_in
            et_output         = lt_mapping_out
          EXCEPTIONS
            logsys_not_found  = 1
            driver_not_found  = 2
            product_not_found = 3
            internal_error    = 4
            OTHERS            = 5.
    So it is ok, you have the mapping call, but I don't know if all the rest of the process was really "finalized" (call of API mapping in CI, via XI). I personnaly never used it, but I assume it should work.
    I my opinion your process is supported by SAP:
    - Extract materials from both R/3 and consolidate them as a single product in MDM.
    - Distribute this product into SRM.
    - Maintain contracts on those products.
    - Distribute them to R/3 (The ECI call is also used during contract distribution).
    - Call offs corrects in SRM and BW
    For MDM documentation, look at netweaver area of service.sap.com.
    For MDM/SRM integration, look at SRM 4.0 spend analysis:
    https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700004424262004E/GlobalSpendOverview.ppt
    For SRM contract distribution, call-offs, BW, look at SRM in details in service.sap.com/srm/SRM4.0:
    https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700001966382004E/contracten.ppt
    For SRM5.0, see online help on help.sap.com.
    Rgds
    Christophe

Maybe you are looking for