Message/Content filters & SLBL

Hi There,
I couldn't find an answer to this question in the Knowledge base, so hopefully someone here can help me out.
Is there a way to get a message filter or content filter to know what the recipient user has done to a message in their Safelist/Block list?
Here is the message filter I have currently:
QuarantineSuspectSBRSEmails: if (reputation > -3.0) AND (reputation <= -1.0) {
insert-header("X-IronPort-Quarantine", "Quarantine");
I'm planning to move this message filter into content filters as I just realized I'm adding unneeded load by processing the message BEFORE checking it for spam, and where I would only need this filter to be checked on the inbound only.
But still, I cannot seem to find a way to make content filters check the end users SLBL list to take action on the message. Does anyone have a suggestion on what I can do?

The safelist/blacklist(SLBL) is applied after message filters and before the anti-spam scanning by a per-recipient policy. If a sender address is part of an end users safelist, anti-spam scanning is skipped, and if the sender
address is listed in the blocklist, the message may be quarantined or dropped depending on administrator settings.
So, when the message comes in, the recipient has either seen this sender or has never seen this sender before. If they've never seen this sender, then it proceeds like normal.
If the recipient has seen it before and has decided to mark it a certain way, the recipient either categorizes it in their Safelist (i.e. whitelist) or categorizes it in their Blocklist(i.e blacklist by dropping or quarantining).
Can you give an example of what the content filter would do if it received once of these types of messages? Are you trying to use a combination of the inbound content filter and the users safelist/blacklist to predict what the end user would do with connections coming in with a SBRS score between -3 and -1?
Hi There,
I couldn't find an answer to this question in the Knowledge base, so hopefully someone here can help me out.
Is there a way to get a message filter or content filter to know what the recipient user has done to a message in their Safelist/Block list?
Here is the message filter I have currently:
QuarantineSuspectSBRSEmails: if (reputation > -3.0) AND (reputation <= -1.0) {
insert-header("X-IronPort-Quarantine", "Quarantine");
I'm planning to move this message filter into content filters as I just realized I'm adding unneeded load by processing the message BEFORE checking it for spam, and where I would only need this filter to be checked on the inbound only.
But still, I cannot seem to find a way to make content filters check the end users SLBL list to take action on the message. Does anyone have a suggestion on what I can do?

Similar Messages

Galaxy s2 gives me a message saying "your content filtering level doesn't allow you to download this item."

<blockquote>Locking duplicate thread.<br>
Please continue here: [[/questions/918255]]</blockquote>
When I try to download Firefox for Android I get the message as previously stated. I have a Samsung Galaxy SII with T-Mobile.

"Content filter" is the Android Market's method for restricting certain applications that may provide access to "mature" content. You can disable content filtering in the settings of the Market app on your phone.
-Michelle

Message filters vs Content Filters

Differences:
1. Message filters occur earlier in the email pipeline than content filters. Message filters before the email goes into the workqueue. The content filters occur inside the workqueue.
2. Message filters are currently only administered from the command line. Content filters can be administered from both the CLI and the GUI interface, however, the GUI interface is the recommended mehtod.
3. Content filters have an inbound and an outbound set of content filters, depending upon the direction of the message. That is, whether it's a relayed email (outgoing content filters) or inbound mail(inbound content filters). Message filters on the other hand, are autmoatically applied to both inbound and outgoing traffic, unless you lock it down to a specific listener. If you only have one listener, you may need to differentiate your flow of traffic by sendergroups or something else.
4. Message filters and content filters can pretty much have the same conditions and actions. However, message filters allow for if-else conditions, so they are more robust.
5. You can use message and content filters in unison. For example, use a message filter to insert a custom header that you content filter can key off of. However, this does not work the other way around. You cannot insert a custom header in the content filter and have the message filter key off of that info. Due to the way the email pipeline is set up, message filters come first, then content filters.
6. Easy of use: content filters are a bit more intuitive and user-friendly. message filters are more advanced, so it has a bigger learning curve.
7. Content filters used with customized incoming or outgoing mail policies allow you to splinter messages. Splintering messages allow you to split messages up by recipients. Message filters don't allow splintering and are applied to the entire message.
AsyncOS User Guide: Content Filters Overview
https://support.ironport.com/docs/c_series/4.6/HTML_4.6_Compilation/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide-12-3.html
AsyncOS User Guide: Message Filters
https://support.ironport.com/docs/c_series/4.6/HTML_4.6_Compilation/AsyncOS_4.6_Adv_User_Guide/AsyncOS_4.6_Adv_User_Guide-09-2.html
AsyncOS User Guide: Email Pipeline
https://support.ironport.com/docs/c_series/4.6/HTML_4.6_Compilation/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide-09-2.html

Actually, I just did a test on this and your point is half correct.
It's not the content filter that does the splintering, it's either the incoming or outgoing mail policy that does the splintering.
For example, if you only have one Default outgoing policy and an outgoing content filter that drops the mail if the destination is @yahoo.com.
If you sent in a test email with two recipients: [email protected] and [email protected]
Then the entire message would get dropped since there was only one Default outgoing policy.
However, you can allow for splintering if you had additional custom policies.
For example,
1. gmail-recipients
2. yahoo-recipients
3. Default policy
In that case, your test email would split into two separate emails and then you could have the content filters apply to each separately.
You are correct that message filters apply to the entire message and does not allow for message splintering.
However, content filtering, message splintering is only applicable if you have additional custom policy, either inbound or outgoing.
So, in additional to the requirement of mutliple recipients, you also need multiple policies, otherwise, have multiple recipients and only one Default policy will affect the entire message also.
Thanks for the attention to detail.
You've missed one of the biggest differences...
Message filters act on a _message_. Content filters act on a message/recipient pair.
If a message is only going to a single person then there's not any difference, but if a message is addresses to multiple people then the message filter will take the same action for all recipients, whilst the content filter will split ("splinter") the one message into multiple messages, with one (or possibly more) recipients each, and then act on each individually.

550 5.7.1 Message rejected as spam by Content Filtering

We are running Exchange 2010. I have a couple of users who are not receiving emails due to our content filter. When I check the message tracking log in our Edge Server it points to a 550 5.7.1 Message rejected as spam by Content Filtering. I guess my question
is, how do I check to see what message in that particular email trigger the email as being spam???? Is this possible?

Checking this might help. Body text doesn't allow me to post links yet. Pasted the content over.
While the IMF can be somewhat helpful, it can be a detriment if you as the administrator don’t remember or even realize that it was installed on the server in the first place. This can be especially troublesome when you have an additional 3rd party
filtering service in place. If you have IMF installed it essentially means you are double filtering your mail, once at the 3rd party spam filter and once at the Exchange Server. In cases that a 3rd Party Filtering is in place we typically recommend disabling
the IMF feature. This is of course just a recommendation and you should do whatever you feel is best for your network environment.
How Does the IMF Identify Messages as Spam?
When a message reaches an Exchange Server with IMF installed, IMF will evaluate the textual content of the messages and then assign the message a Spam Confidence Level (SCL) rating from 1-9 based on the probability the message is Unsolicited Commercial Email
(UCE). This rating is then compared to the threshold set under Message Delivery Properties > Intelligent Message Filter in the Exchange System Manager.
How Do I Find Messages in the IMF?
Theoretically the IMF is supposed to place messages that it found as spam in your Outlook Junk Folder. Unfortunately, this doesn’t always tend to be the case. If you have reports that messages are “missing” on your server and you can’t find them, check
the IMF! To check this service, you will need to make sure that you have the Archiving option enabled. You can view the *Archived folder location here: C:program files[YOUR SERVER]mailroot[SMTP VIRTUAL SERVER]ucearchive.
*To view these archived messages you will need to download and install a 3rd-party tool. If you have any recommendations regarding these tools, please leave them in the comments below.
Where is IMF installed?
When IMF is installed a new tab is added to the Exchange System Manager. For Exchange 2003, the tab is under Message Delivery > Properties under Global Settings.
There is also a new Intelligent Message Filtering node under Protocols > SMTP – This is where you enable IMF.
For Exchange 2007, it is under Exchange Management Console Server Configuration > Hub Transport > Anti – Spam.

High Amount of Spam on Exchange 2013 - Content Filtering is Enabled but Pfizer Spam Filling Up Everyone's Mailboxes

Hello
Previously I used Exchange 2010 with Forefront Threat Protection installed and this used to do a good job of stopping all the spam.
However since updating to Exchange 2013 earlier this year and enabling the integrated spam filtering everyone noticed a sudden increase in the amount of spam which was getting through which has been bad for a long time.
We have been living with it but in the last 3 weeks everyone has started getting about 40 emails a day from Pfizer for Viagra. All these seem to defeat the content filtering as Viagra is spelt with an extra I and the email address is always different.
Also images in emails are blocked by default but somehow all the images on these spam messages appear for everyone.
I am not sure the spam filtering is working at all and I'm not sure how to tell as ForeFront gives you a nice graphical dashboard but I can find nothing similar to this in Exchange and PowerShell seems the only way to configure the limited functionality
of the content filter.
Is there any way to get rid of these messages as it doesn't look very good when they are constantly popping up for everyone?
Thanks
Robin
Robin Wilson

Hello ManU
Thanks for the reply.
I have checked the logs and see this quite often:
AcceptMessage,,SCL,not available: policy is disabled
But other times it says this:
RejectMessage,550 5.7.1 Message rejected as spam by Content Filtering
Which seems to indicate it is rejecting some.
This is what one of the email headers look like:
Received: from RWS-MAIL.rwsservices.net (192.168.2.151) by
RWS-MAIL.rwsservices.net (192.168.2.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
15.0.775.38 via Mailbox Transport; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:59:26 +0000
Received: from RWS-MAIL.rwsservices.net (192.168.2.151) by
rws-mail.rwsservices.net (192.168.2.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
15.0.775.38; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:58:38 +0000
Received: from [90.169.106.204] (90.169.106.204) by mail.rwsservices.net
(192.168.2.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.775.38 via Frontend
Transport; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:58:37 +0000
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:05:58 +0200
From: US.Pfizer eStore <[email protected]>
To: robin.wilson <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: Dear robin.wilson up to 65% OFF!
X-Mailer: Airmail (223)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="dd2ee3ea_586bb9e4_6f04"
Return-Path: [email protected]
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: 001-taxis.co.uk
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Neutral
Received-SPF: Neutral (rws-mail.rwsservices.net: 90.169.106.204 is neither
permitted nor denied by domain of [email protected])
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: e8825204-1f32-48be-a331-08d0d1d30209
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: 1
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PCL: 2
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Antispam-Report: DV:3.3.13223.464;SID:SenderIDStatus Neutral;OrigIP:90.169.106.204
X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 079171ba-394f-46d5-a160-56e416712e8e
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Enterprise: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: rws-mail.rwsservices.net
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
The emails use a different sender email address every time and there is always a poem in very light grey writing in the body of the email. The drugs are always misspelt as well. Is this why these are getting through?
Thanks
Robin
Robin Wilson

Exchange 2013 SP1 EDGE role content filtering ?

Hello,
Have Exchange 2013 SP1 with CU5 with antispam enabled on mailbox role server. And i wonder if i deploy 2013 Edge role, will i get more granular content filter control, like there is in Office 365? For example: i want to treat empty messages as not
spam.
I have read that control of Edge server is done ONLY by powershell. So if edge role is deployed, still there is no content filter control in ECP (like in office365) ??

Hi,
The Content Filter agent assigns a spam confidence level (SCL) rating to each message. The SCL rating is a number between 0 and 9. A higher SCL rating indicates that a message is more likely to be spam.
Based on my knowledge, I'm afraid we can't filter the empty messages and treat them as not spam.
Here is an article about content filtering in Exchange 2013 for your reference.
Content Filtering
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124739(v=exchg.150).aspx
Best regards,
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

DHCP reservation & DNS for content filtering

Hi All,
I am working around with server 2008 for quite a while and facing a problem as below,
1.DHCP reservation error
Server Ip:192.168.0.254 (configured as DNS server for local use only with AD & DHCP)
DHCP scope: 192.168.0.100 to 192.168.0.200 excluded 192.168.0.100 to 192.168.0.110
earlier the same scope was 192.168.0.10 to 192.168.0.100. I was facing a error when I make a IP reservation against a MAC number error was " The unique identifier may not be correct do you want to use the identifier anyway" when I click yes "DHCP
server received a message from a client that is not valid" and by this error I am not able to make any reservations now against MAC numbers.
The same error was also on the earlier scope and that's why changed to a new scope but did not work. Any solutions will me much appreciated
2.DNS fine tuning.
I have an open DNS account on which my WAN IP number is configured to do a content filtering. I have two LAN ports with the below IP number
Local : 192.168.0.254 ( configured with no gateway and DNS as loopback (127.0.0.1)
ISP: 192.168.0.253 (with ISP gateway and DNS as loop back adapter & open DNS)
I have did a content filtering and things are working fine. But I got to open up some machines out of this content filtering and when I try to give the IP number in this below fashion.
192.168.0.115
255.255.255.0
192.168.0.1
DNS
192.168.0.254
ISP DNS to avoid filtering
I find that 192.168.0.254 does the resolving and things are still filtered as per the schedule. Is there a way where we can configure 192.168.0.254 (Local DNS server) to stop resolving web requests and only cater to resolving local names for connectivity.
I do know its too long but solutions for the same will be help me out to solve it. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Vaschell

Hello,
I have found something strange on the DHCP reservation. When I try to add a MAC number out of the network its able to make out a reservation.
Is there any way to clear the MAC number cache or something else which I can try.
A copy of the ipconfig /all for the server is below,
C:\Users\Administrator>ipconfig /all
Windows IP Configuration
   Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : server
   Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : xyzabc.com
   Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
   IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : Yes
   WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
   DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : xyzabc.com
Ethernet adapter LOCAL:
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) I210 Gigabit Network Connectio
#2
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1E-67-A4-F4-DC
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.254(Preferred)
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 127.0.0.1
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
Ethernet adapter ISP:
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) I210 Gigabit Network Connectio
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1E-67-A4-F4-DB
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.253(Preferred)
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1
   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 127.0.0.1
                                       208.67.222.222
                                       208.67.220.220
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
PPP adapter RAS (Dial In) Interface:
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : RAS (Dial In) Interface
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . :
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.205(Preferred)
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.255
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 8:
   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : isatap.{0602F6CF-4B32-491F-994A-3C0952D
B54}
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 9:
   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : isatap.{6A14710B-A078-4AF9-BD7A-989767F
377}
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 11:
   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 02-00-54-55-4E-01
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 12:
   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #3
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
C:\Users\Administrator>
Thanks,
Vaschell

How to change content filtering level 101

I am not saavy when it comes to phone technology. I am trying to change the content filtering level on my Motorola so I will be able to download apps, when I try to download I get a message stating the content filtering level won't allow me to download the app. I cannot even figure out where the menu is option is to access the settings
. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance. P

Try going to settings (swipe down from top and select the settings button then find security, in there you should find the settings you are looking for.

How do I create Outgoing Mail Policie,Outgoing content filters and individual content filters?

IronPort C160.
async OS 6.5.3
Server 1 and server 2 are communicating through ironport.( and also scanning)
Server 1 we have setup domain abc.lk and yy.abc.lk in same server, this reside on DMZ. same segment ironport is connected,
Server 2: we have setup separate server int.abc.lk which is resided on internal lan.
Server 1 and server 2 should have to communicate internally, but server2 should not communicate to outside the world (eg. [email protected])
How do I create "Outgoing Mail Policies, Outgoing content filters and the individual content filters?
Note: Now server 1 and server2 are communicating internal and also communicating external ([email protected]), I need server 2 not to communicate external ([email protected]) it should be block and also do not block server 2 communicating to server1
I have attached diagram also.
Thanks.
sumathi.

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
Hello Sumathi,
(Thanks for adding a diagram, that helps understanding your situation)
I think the simplest solution is to create a filter that allows server 2 (based on it's IP) to communicate with the internal domains, and drop the messages when they are targeted to any other domain
so:
filter source IP = servers
condition: message to: is NOT abc.lk or yy.abc.lk
action: drop message
hope this helps!
Steven

Content Filtering - exe file

Hi
we are using SJES 6.2 for our Mailing system and i have following doubts.
1) In which file & where we are specifying content filtering ??
2) content filtering means
if any user sends an exe file or any other specified file to our mail
server it should be rejected or bounced back to same user .
3) Plz let me know if anybody knows how to configure content
filtering ???
Thanks in Advance

The only way for Messaging Server itself to do content filtering, such as you request is through the Conversion Channel. This is pretty inefficient.
What most user do, is use external products, such as SpamAssassin, ClamAV, and such, which do a better job, more efficiently. These two products are free.

IOS content filtering on trend micro subscription

hi
i just finish setup the IOS content filtering on C1841. basically it's combo of local filtering and Trend micro subscrition based. all the parameter-map, class-map, policy-map and zone firewall setting is up and ready to go.
Some question to ask
1. how do i examine trend micro content filtering on it REPUTATION and CATEGORIES is really working?
as usual, after setup these command :
paramater-map type trend-global MY-GLOBAL-PARAM
server trps.trendmicro.com
pamater-map type urlfpolicy trend MY-PARAM
allow-mode on
block-pass message "bla-bla-bla"
class-map type urlfilter trend match-any trend-block-categories
match url catergory Adult-Mature-Content
class-map type urlfilter trend match-any trend-block-reputation
match url reputation ADWARE
policy-map type inspect urlfilter MY-ACTION
parameter type urlfpolicy trend MY-PARAM
class type urlfilter trend trend-block-categories
reset
class type urlfilter trendtrend-block-reputation
reset
so for my zone firewall policy:
policy-map type inspect out->in
class type inspect trafic
inspect
service-policy urlfilter MY-ACTION
then i do apply zone-pair to the outside and inside interface,everything set to go.
so far what i can block is only using URL-blacklist to block the whole domain. anyway how can totally left to trend micro subscription license to do with it all?
noel

Hmm... no thoughts over the weekend. Anyone?

How to asign some content filtering policies to a wan port ISA550

Hi, I have a Cisco ISA550, and we are trying to make some url's rules for the network. I have established a policie, with some content and url's, but now I need to asign them to a configurable wan port. What I have do is:
1. Go to firewall and open content filtering policies
2. Generate a new filtering policie. (named: diarios)
3. Load the policie with some URL (all are enabled with the tickets)
4. go to Policy to Zone Mapping and change the LAN zone. Now using "diarios"
5. Content filtering turned ON
6. Go to Advance settings and configure it.
everything saved and it works. But now I need to asign this rule only to wan port #3.
Can someone help me please?
Thanks a lot.

Open the Trace Log panel in Scout - it shows you all the trace messages for the selected frames (in a console-like view). If you select all frames, you can see all trace messages for the entire session.
See Figure 27, here:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/scout/articles/adobe-scout-getting-started.html

Does "first match" win on Content Filters?

If I define multiple content filters for a given outbound mail policy, would system stop looking at filters once a match is found on one of the content filters or should I force that by using a "final" action in my content filters?
I know "first match wins" apply to some other scenarios, but couldn't see a clear explanation to above question in section 6 of Config guide where content filters are defined (and testing with system did not clear that for me either).
Thanks.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Hello John,
An emaill being processed by the content filters or messages filters will continue down the list of content/message filters until it hits the last filter or a 'final' action filter command. If the email being processed needs to exit (by administrative choice), the filter it hits, should have a final action. This only applies to certain conditions, where the administrator does not want the filter's last action to be overwritten by another filter down the pipeline.
cheers,
-Alvaro

DKIM/DomainKeys Content Filters Best Practices?

Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone has some best practices on implementing content filters for domain keys/dkim results on incoming mail. I am having a tough time figuring out a good solution to this problem as we have various users who also subscribe to mailing lists, which obviously break domain keys if the server doesn't resign the message?
Any suggestions would be helpful.
Thanks!

Hi,
SDN is using Web Page Composer. You should also take a look into WPC for publishing EFP. WPC is based on KM, but has several advantages over XML Forms.
Regarding the security aspect:
There are several SDN articles / documentations about how to implement an EFP (like: Look & Feel, Framework Pages and Portal Navigation).
You can restrict access for anonymous users - in fact, you'll have to explicitly allow access for anonymous users. If you don't like that your users can access something else than /etc/public/, just don't give the guest user read access. You can alsouse a reverse proxy to allow access to only the necessary KM folders and redirect the rest to the start page.
br,
Tobias

Re: content filters not available

Branched from content filters not available
AdaS (or anyone else @ VZW) --
So... Here we are again. It is now a year since the issue was originally raised on here.
Why does Verizon not want to develop content filters for customers on their 4G network with 4G LTE phones?? What are consumers not being told?
The 3G content filter was developed by Verizon to allow the user filtering controls on the Verizon network. We want Verizon to replicate what it did for their 3G network and do the same when our 4G phones access their 4G network. What's the big deal??
Please stop the running-in-circles-game. Don't keep sending us to the various manufacturers. That is not where the answer is. Why is this issue not important enough for Verizon to have addressed it by now?
I apologize if I may be coming across as less than pleasant, but why does this have to be so frustrating??
Message was edited by: Admin Moderator

I think you misunderstand. This thread is looking for the network content filtering to be available. The S4 does not have content filtering as it has no options available when logged into my account. The filtering you just suggested simply limits what apps you can choose to download out of the play store, not filtering the web traffic on the device.
I checked out the link you sent, and under Family Safeguards and Controls, the option we are all wanting is the “Content Filters”. However, these are the ones that simply display “Content Filters Not Available” when you go to configure them on your account.
The question is, when is it going to be available or is it never? If not, what 4G phones will it work on if any?
This was an awesome feature with the 3G phones, but is a major loss so far with the 4G.

Message/Content filters & SLBL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for