Message Mapping Problem

HI I am calling a Java Mapping Prog from My message Mapping . I get A strange Message when i pass special characters like '?' or '*' through my message mapping to the java mapping .
The Message is "For input string : ???". when i pass ??? as a parameter to the java mapping. I am bit confused. Is This message a standard message that XI gives or is it getting generated from somewhere else.
regards
Nilesh .

Hi Nilesh ,
Test the java mapping program using a seperate main class in some editor ( eg. Eclipse or NWDS) ,
Try to debug the program and u will get to know the cause , as to whr the message is getting generated ,
Regards ,
Sushil

Similar Messages

Message Mapping Problem with UTF-16LE Encoded XML

Hello,
we have the following scenario:
IDoc > BPM > HTTP Sync Call > BPM > IDoc
Resonse message of the HTTP call is a XML file with UTF-16LE processing instruction. This response should then be mapped to a SYSTAT IDoc. However the message mapping fails "...XML Parser: No data allowed here ...".
So obviously the XML is not considered as well-formed.
When taking a look at SXMB_MONI the following message appears: "Switch from current encoding to specific encoding not supported.....".
Strange thing however is if I save the response file as XML and use the same XML file in the test tab message mapping is executed successfully.
I also tried to use a Java Mapping to switch encodings before executing message mapping, but the error remains.
Could the problem be, that the codepage UTF-16LE is not installed on the PI system ? Any idea on that ?
Thank you!
Edited by: Florian Guppenberger on Feb 2, 2010 2:29 PM
Edited by: Florian Guppenberger on Feb 2, 2010 2:29 PM

Hi,
thank your for your answer.
This is what I have tried to achieve. I apply the java conversion mapping when receiving the response message - i tried to convert the response to UTF-16, UTF-8 but none of them has helped to solve the problem.
I guess that using adapter modules is not an option either as it would modify the request message, but not the response, right?

MESSAGE MAPPING PROBLEM PLS HELP

hi forum i have a problem in message mapping...
i have a file to file scenario...with a BPM..
the components are:
1. one outbound async MI:-> MI_OA_fileSender
2. one abstract async MI:-> MI_AA_fileSender
the above two has messsage structure as:
<ns0:MT_sourceFile xmlns:ns0="http://zpoc.com.test/rana3">
 <recordset> 1...1
 <record> 1..unbound
 <batch_num/> 1..1
 <quantity/> 1..1
 </record>
 </recordset>
</ns0:MT_sourceFile>
3. one abstract async MI: -> MI_AA_fileDestination
4. one inbound async MI:-> MI_IA_fileDestination..
the above two has messsage structure as:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_destinationFile xmlns:ns0="http://zpoc.com.test/rana3">
 <recordset> 1..1
 <record> 1..unbound
 <rec_number/> 1...1
 <qty/> 1...1
 </record>
 </recordset>
</ns0:MT_rana3_destinationFile>
inside the BPM i m doing a simple one to one interface mapping between MI_AA_fileSender and MI_AA_fileDestination AND then use a send step to send it to receiver service. But inside the graphical editor, for the message maaping in the interface mapping, i change the target structure a bit by duplicating <rec_number> making it:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_destinationFile xmlns:ns0="http://zpoc.com.test/rana3">
 <recordset> 1..1
 <record> 1.. unbound
 <rec_number/> 0..1
 <rec_number/> 0..1 //did right click and "duplicate sub-tree, so it becomes 0...0"
 <qty/>
 </record>
 </recordset>
</ns0:MT_destinationFile>
But i dont change the original structure of MT_destinationFile.
Now in the resultant file in the receiver side i recive two <rec_number> tags....
but since i didnt change the original structure of MT_destinationFile.....but i only made a change in the mapping by duplicating the node <rec
_number>(right click and done "duplicate sub tree").............SHOULD IT NOT THROW AN ERROR
Message was edited by:
 sudeep dhar
Message was edited by:
 sudeep dhar

>.............SHOULD IT NOT THROW AN ERROR
Not necessarily.
See, XI won't realize, by default, a schema validation in your messages. If you want a validation, you'll have to implement one, as described in
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c4/e1343e8c7f6329e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
However, for some particular steps in BPM, I have observed that an invalid XML will some times result in a error in BPM execution. In particular, if you have switch steps, container operation steps and/or correlations where you use a particular field of that message, it may throw some exception when you have an invalid xml. Also, I have observed some errors with conditional receiver determination for invalid messages.
As a best practice, if you have any kind of dependency on a particular message inside your system (like switches, container operations, correlations, condition in receiver or interface determination etc), it is a good idea to implement a schema validation.
Also, if you do want to create a thrustable scenario, you might want to perform schema validation for all your output messages.
Regards,
Henrique.

Message mapping problem / experts needed / UDF?

Hello experts,
I have the following problem in a message mapping:
Source structure is as follows:
- Node a (min 1, max 999)
- Subnode b (min 0, max 999)
- Each Subnode b has the element "number" (1,1)
This structure must be mapped to the following target structure:
- Node c (1,999)
 - Subnode d (0,999)
 - Each subnode d has the following elements:
 - e1
 - e2
 - e3
 - e11
1 Source node a should create 1 target node c.
All numbers in all subnodes b of one source node a should be mapped to the e1, e2,...e11 elements of the target structure. As one target node d can only contain up to eleven numbers, there must be several d nodes.
I have already tried to create a UDF, but it does not work.
Any experts who would like to share their knowledge?
Thanks in advance.
CHRISTOPH
Edited by: Christoph G. on Apr 23, 2008 10:46 PM

Hello again,
meanwhile I have worked hard on it and I have found the solution (just one UDF (queue function) which gets the article numbers as well as constant(targetField). So the UDF covers the creation of the "groups" as well as the mapping of the article numbers.
It was really interesting and it made me ambitious to find the solution myself I do not have access to the system today, but I will post my solution as far as I have access again. Maybe you still want to search for a solution? It really may be fun, just like some kind of a puzzle game.
In order to make it more clear, here comes the source and target structure with an example. Let me once more explain it: In the source, there are positions, each with unlimited article numbers. Each position will create a targetPosition. The node "targetPosition" has the subNode "articlenrs" (unbounded). Articlenrs has 11 differnet elements, calles a1, a2, a3, ..., a11. That means, all article numbers from a source postion should be mapped to "groups of 11 target article numbers". Please be aware the there are 11 differnet target fields for article numbers: a1, a2, ... a11.
I think that' why the solution of Liang Ji and Rohit Kalugade will not work...
SOURCE
<position>
 <articlenr> 123 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 456 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 4783 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 123 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 456 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 4783 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 123 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 456 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 4783 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 123 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 496 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 4783 </articlenr>
 . (unbounded)
</positon>
<position>
 <articlenr> 543 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 865 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 643 </articlenr>
</positon>
TARGET
<targetPosition>
<articlenrs>
 <a1> 123 </a1>
 <a2> 456 </a2>
 <a3> 4783 </a3>
 <a11> 496 </a11>
<articlenrs>
<articlenrs>
 <a1>4783 </a1>
</articlenrs>
</targetPosition>
<targetPosition>
 <articlenrs>
 <a1> 543 </a1>
 <a2> 865 </a2>
 <a3> 643 </a3>
 </articlenrs>
</targetPosition>
Thanks,
Christoph
Edited by: Christoph G. on Apr 30, 2008 10:20 AM

Request Message Mapping Problem

Hello friends,
I am working in XI 2.0 and
my senario is sap R/3->XI->File Adapter
I take an idoc from the SAP R/3 system. and that comes properly to XI. I already created Data type, Message Type,
Interface Type, Message Mapping and Interface Mapping in Desing. and all the configuration part.
but when i send an idoc to XI system and check in SXMB_MONI at that time it shows me a green flag. means Inbound is Proper but It does not execute further steps.
like Request Message Mapping, Call Adapter, Response.
Can any one help me to solve this situation..
Thanks in Advance.

hi Shankar,
I am able to solve the previous problem. by restarting my m/c.
Now if any one know that how to configure RFC adapter.
it always give me error like.
Attempt to start RFC adapter failed: com/sap/mw/jco/JCO$Record
And this is due to I am not able to connect to other R/3 system.
In SM59 transaction
AI_RFCADAPTER_JCOSERVER - TCP/IP connection
when i register my program id to Xmb2RfcService
then it gives me error when i am testing my connection.
program Xmb2RfcService not registered / CPI-C error CM_ALLOCATE_FAILURE_RETRY.
so, can any one help me out to solve this problem.
how to register Service in XI.
Thanks,
Gaurav Jain
Message was edited by: Gaurav Jain

Message mapping problem: BAPI with range table parameters

A kind hello to all,
I try to call the BAPI_ALM_ORDERHEAD_GET_LIST in a 4.70 system via RFC connector. The configuration already works with another BAPI. With this here I get message mapping exception:
Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Zielelement /ns1:BAPI_ALM_ORDERHEAD_GET_LIST kann nicht angelegt werden. Prüfen Sie, ob die XML-Instanz für die Ausgangs-XSD und die Zielfeldzuordnung die Anforderungen der Ziel-XSD erfüllt. at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start
(How can I switch the trace language to English easily? I try to translate:
"BAPI_ALM_ORDERHEAD_GET_LIST cannot be created. Check if the XML instance meets the requirements for the output XSD and the destination field mapping meets the requirements of the destination XSD.")
But the mapping test tool in the Integration Builder Design does not report any warning or error.
My guess is that the problem lies in the parameter structure of the BAPI_ALM_ORDERHEAD_GET_LIST: I have to fill the IT_RANGES selection range table, so it looks as if I need several instances of the item in the corresponding XML. Can I use "Duplicate tree" in the mapping editor? Here I got another exception?
Many thanks for any help!
Regards,
Carsten

Hi Udo,
you gave the final hint, indeed I used a XML file that was not evidently not compliant to the message type I created (even though it had been validated by Altova XMLspy).
From now onwards I only use the "Create instance" function of the test tool to create the XML body of my test messages...
Thanks a lot,
and best regards,
Carsten

Message mapping problem when testing

Hi guys,
I'm having a tiny little problem with a message mapping.
When I'm testing a message mapping I'm getting the following error:
12:28:35 Start of test
Cannot produce target element /ns1:MT_Encomenda/Num_doc. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
12:28:36 End of test
I'm importing a xml file for testing, but if I fill in the files at hand using the xml instance i get no problems.
Any ideas?

hi,
make sure the target field /ns1:MT_Encomenda/Num_doc is getting populated from the source message.
you would see this error if a required field in the target structure is not populated.
cheers,
naveen

Message-Mapping Problem with empty queue while testing

Hello,
I want to develope an mapping to an BMEcat-structure. This mapping should be an filter.
My problem is, that everytime I want to check, if my mapping works correct, the queues for the proccessing steps keeps empty.
I filled a test case with all data I needed for the step I want to test (not the whole mapping is ready, but for this step, it is). Now I go to my mapping step an check the queue for the parameters and the queue comes up and displays the correct values. In next step I want to display the queue of an "equalsS"-Step, but this queue keeps empty as all following queues too. Sometimes there is coming up an empty "Processing log"-window.
The problem only comes up, if the target-message is a BMEcat-Structure.
Have you any solution for this behaviour? Or do you need more informations?
Here you can find some Screenshots:
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00113.jpg
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00114.jpg
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00115.jpg
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00116.jpg
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00117.jpg
Edited by: Dirk Koch on Feb 6, 2008 12:00 PM

Hello,
thank you for your tip, but the main problem is still existing. As you can see in the next screenshots, I build in your code and I'm sure it normally works fine. Also I filled the "have to"-Fields in the strukture, so that the check-function (F7) delivers an all right.
But still I get no queue results.
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00118.jpg
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00119.jpg
For tests you can take these informations:
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/Z_RFC_EAN_CHECK_resp.xsd
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/bmecat_2005_XSDs.zip
Edited by: Dirk Koch on Feb 6, 2008 12:56 PM

Message mapping problem after RFC import in SP14

This never happened in earlier versions. If I make minor changes to RFC structures (ex: add new field) and than reimport, my mapping (in the past) needed adjustments only for the new fields. Now, all fields need to be remapped.
Anyone facing similar issues? Is there any patch for this?
Thank you.

Hi Parimala,
Even it should not happen . But even I have faced this once. But I just added some spaces and activated. It worked for me.
But if you are changing your source structure, then it usally happens. But if it is target then it is not happening.
It is just my views,
Regards,
Moorthy

Message Mapping - problem with target sequence

Hi, I hope somebody can help:
I have already read lots of blog entries and help articles to find a solution but all the tricks with node functions and special conditions didn't help yet.
I would like the sequence of A and B nodes just as is. In the source structure they are on the same level and in the target structure B is subnode of A.
Thank you very much in advance.
Source structure:
Node A
- source fields A
Node A
- source fields A
Node A
- source fields A
Node B
- source fields B
Node A
- source fields A
Node B
- source fields B
Node B
- source fields B
Target structure (desired):
A
- fields A
A
- fields A
A
- fields A
   B
   - fields B
A
- fields A
   B
   - fields B
   B
   - fields B
However, what I get is:
A
- fields A
   B
   - fields B
   B
   - fields B
   B
   - fields B
   B
   - fields B
A
- fields A
A
- fields A
A
- fields A

Hi,
Can u try like this.
Map one to one.
Dont use any node function also dont change any conexts also af any node or element.
But in target,make node B is under node A, and both are 0..unbounded occurence.
Try with this....
Let us know the result.
Babu

Problem while activating message mapping

Hi all,
I am facing a problem while activating message mapping in IR.It says Object being edited by XXXX and cannot be activated.It's giving my user name itself and even it doesn't allow to go to edit mode even.But I am not opening it twice.How to monitor all the XI users logged into the XI system and find the users using IR and ID objects.Please help in this regard.
Thanks.

Hi Jaya
It is .....
http://<host:port>/rep/support/public/LockAdminService
Hope this helps !!!
Regards,
J Augastine

Problem in message Mapping SAP PI 7.1

Hi Experts,
I have a problem in my Message Mapping,
Design: [Design|http://www.life-4-music.de/prob.jpg]
Messagemapping: [MappingTest|http://www.life-4-music.de/probII.jpg]
The Problem is, that ElementC from SourceMessage occours "0 to n" times in Element A, but I need to check every ElementC in ElementA to TargetElementA with a IF Statement.
I tried a lot of things, like change the CONTEXT of the ELEMENT or use SPLIT BY VALUE but without success.
Rgds,
Steffen

Hello, thanks a lot for the fast awnser. I tried this allready to change the Context of the Elements "system" in this Mapping: Changed Context
For Example in one field I check for Entry "ERP" in Source Field "system" , if "ERP" is in the first ELEMENT then it will be mapped correctly: Example ERP works
But If "ERP" is in an element below, then it doesn´t work, so it seems to be, that he only map the first occurrence of the Elements. : Example SCADA don´t work
Here is the View of the QUEUE from the don´t working Example: Show QUEUE of not working Example
maybe u have a tip for me again , because I´m allready desperate
Thanks a lot.
Rgds,
Steffen

Mapping problem in message response RFC -- xi -- JDBC

Hi all,
I'm using the follow scenario:
RFC <-> xi <-> JDBC
It's a synchronous interface.
In JDBC the message do a SELECT in database and returns selected rows in message response.
The message response transfers selected rows to RFC.response in the mapping.
It seems working right but no data are transfered to RFC.
In SXMB_MONI I can see the selected rows from database.
There is no error in JDBC and RFC adapter. Bellow is the message response in the SXMB_MONI:
<ns1:MT_jbdc_select_response xmlns:ns1="http://braskem.com.br/xi/sapxi03">
<t7_productionorder_response>
<row>
<PRODUCT>Nafta Media</PRODUCT>
</row>
<row>
<PRODUCT>Nafta Media</PRODUCT>
</row>
</t7_productionorder_response>
</ns1:MT_jbdc_select_response>
I think that there is an error in message mapping between RFC.response <-- message_response, because I'm just mapping the fields <row> and <product>, because if I make a link beteween <t7_productionorder_response> and return table of RFC, a Short DUMP happens.
Bellow the structure of MESSAGE RESPONSE:
 <t7_productionorder_response>
 <row>
 <PRODUCT/>
 </row>
 </t7_productionorder_response>
Bellow the structure of RFC RESPONSE:
<RFC.response>
<t_return>
 <item>
 <product/>
 </item>
</return>
</RFC.response>
When I make a link in the mapping between
<t7_productionorder_response> -> <t_return>
a short DUMP happens in RFC call in R/3.
Anyone could help me about this problem ?
Thanks in advance
Regis Ferrato

Hi,
because if I make a link beteween <t7_productionorder_response> and return table of RFC, a Short DUMP happens.
After doing this mapping, did you test it in the IR mapping editor? was it successful?
Do specify the occurence of all the headers so we can help you better.
Regards,
Smitha.

Problem by transporting the message mapping from PI 7.0 to PI 7.1

Hi Everyone,
by transporting the message mapping from PI 7.0 to PI 7.1 i have got the following problem.
"Source code has syntax error:
K:\usr\sap\E71\DVEBMGS00\j2ee\cluster\serve......
package udfpool does not exist
import udfpool.*;
i have used a UDF in my message mapping.
This UDF calls for a method of a java class, which is imported as a .jar file with this message mapping.
this message mapping works very well on PI 7.0,
but doesn't work any more on PI 7.1 because of the problem described above.
anyone can help me out of this problem?
thanks!
zc

hi,
but did you import the jar archive to 7.1 first?
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk
http://mypigenie.com XI/PI FAQ

Problem in message mapping index.

HI All,
I am doing idoc to file scenario.
I have a problem in message mapping.
Issue is,
pallet1
palletheader(here i used counter to increment the value)
palletline(here i used INDEX to increment the value)
        pallet linenumber1(it should be 1)
        pallet linenumber2(it should be 2)
so on       )
so on
pallet2
palletheader
palletline
        pallet linenumber1(here again it should be 1)
        pallet linenumber2(here again it should be 2)
so on              )
so on
In INDEX we have option called reset index in that we have two radio buttons
one is "reset index to intial value with each new context"
and next one is "donot reset index to intiak value"
if i use the first radio button which is working fine in only one pallet and more pallet lines but not more than one pallet.
If i use the second radio buttton which is working fine in more than one pallet but not satisfying the more pallet lines in one pallet.
Can you please help me on the issue

my requirement is like this.
IF DELVRY05/IDOC/E1EDL20/E1EDL24/POSNR equals to /DELVRY05/IDOC/E1EDL20/E1EDL37/E1EDL44/EXIDV
then map to 'pallet line' .
I tried to keep posnr context as E1EDL20 and also IDOC level.
And at the same way to EXIDV too.
pallet(1 to unbounded)
   pallet header(1 to 1)
   pallet lines(1 to 1)
        in sub level pallet line(1 to unbounded) (here i applied the index logic)
The out put should be pallet line 1,2,3,----- so on
In the second pallet the pallet lines should be again 1,2,3,4-------so on .
But when i try to apply thsi logic,
I am getting only one pallet line instead of two.
second is not comming .
please help on this i am facing this problem for the long time back.
if i solve then i can complete my scenario.

Message Mapping Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for