Method signature of Application Service is changed by Webdynpro

Hi,
I have created a method in application service which takes 3 string arguments. It access create() of Entity service. when I try to access the same method in webdynpro, I found the signature of method is changed.
Method in Application service is <b>addNewRecord(String, String, String</b>). I found in webdynpro ..<b> addNewRecord(IAspect,String,String,String)</b>. why signature of method is changed? how to construct IAspect object?
Thanks in advance..
Haribabu ch.

This is how you would execute such method
          IServiceFacade serviceFacade = CAFServiceFactory.getServiceFacade();
                         IServiceModule serviceModule = serviceFacade.getServiceModule(CorecafDefinition.APPSERVICE);
                         IAspect aspect = serviceModule.createAspect(CorecafDefinition.APPSERVICE);
          IAction action = aspect.createAction(bams1cafDefinition.APPSERVICE_METHOD);
          action.getInputParameterStructure().setAttributeValue("Var1", val1);
          action.getInputParameterStructure().setAttributeValue("var2", val2);
          action.getInputParameterStructure().setAttributeValue("var3", val3);
          action.execute();

Similar Messages

Custom method in application service

Hi All,
i have created a custom method in an application service.But It is not being shown in service browser.
Can you plz tell me what is the reason?.
Thanks
Sampath.G

Hi Sampath,
I think you haven't checkied the thread I mentioned carefully. As I mentioned in my previous reply the CAF Service Browser is based on CAF Web Dynpro model which has lot of limitations. You can refer the <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes/sdn_oss_caf/~form/handler">SAP Note 1030595</a> and <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20063659-4f03-2a10-6a8a-d88786c39b71">this document</a>. After refering these documents you'll understand that CAF Service browser don't support all types of custom application service operations. To test the application service create web service out of it and test it from wsnavigator.
Thanks,
Dipankar

Method as a WEB Service in an Application Service

Dear Colleaguaes,
When importing a web service method into a caf project, and exposing it as method into an application service, is it necessary to create an Entity Service as Web Service wrapper still?
I can check that a web service method works, it returns the data, but it returns nothing when I try to test the corresponding method in the application service.
I've also created a destination in Destination Template Management and done the external service to the destination configured mapping. But still without success....
Thank you in advance,

Hi,
Thanks a lot for your help.
Sorry i didn't specify before but I also have created Web Service Proxy from the URL of my Web Service into my web app. But now I don't now how to use the method that i created on my web service on to my web application.
To be more specific I don't know how to wire the two af:InputText with my web service method in the way when I click the submit button it past the info to web service and which has to return the Student ID :
Ex:
Name: af:InputText
LastName: af:InputText

Problems updating Entity services or application services

Hello all,
I'm working with SAP Netweaver Developer Studio creating a new CAF application.
First all, I import the SAP Entreprise Service, then I model the entity service, I expose my application Service as a Web Service and finally I deploy it and test it.
However, when I try to edit my entity service (for instance, including a new attribute) or application service (for instance, changing the bussiness logic code) and I redeploy it, the Web Service Navigator doesn't update the changes.
So, sadly I must start again configuring the entity and application service.
Any idea??
Thanks,

everytime you change the signature (structure of input/output) of the entity or application service, the change is not automatically propagated to the web service definition. you have to delete manually the web service configuration for the entity or application service or recreate it. you can call it a bug or a feature. it's up to you.

Calling Web Dynpro-Model of Application-Service doesnu00B4t work.

Hello!
I have created a Composite Application with Entity- and Application-Services. I have also created the WebDynpro-Model and use it in another WebDynpro application to call the services.
I have a Entity-Service 'PollCatalogue' and an Application Service 'PollCatalogueApp'.
When I call an Entity-Service to create an entity, it works:
APollCatalogue pollcat =
                    PollCatalogueServiceProxy.createPollCatalogue();
               pollcat.setName(name);
               pollcat.getAspect().sendChanges();
               IServiceFacade serviceFacade;
               serviceFacade =
                    CAFServiceFactory.getServiceFacade(diplDefinition.class);
               serviceFacade.save();
But when I call the create-Method of the Application service nothing is created:
the call is similar to above except that
PollCatalogueServiceProxy.createPollCatalogue();
is replaced by
PollCatalogueAppProxy.createPollCatalogue();
Anyway I don´t understand what is done behind the scenes. My create-Methode has one parameter name, because it is a business key. But the ServiceProxy-create-Methods do not provide a name parameter. What service-methods are called when service-facade.save() is called? In case of Entity-Service-Proxy seems to be the create method. But what if I change more than the key-parameter, what else is called? update? And in case of AppServiceProxy? ???
Does anyone understand what is going on here?
Thank you for your help.
Best regards,
Jörg

Hi Jorg,
About getting an exception:
IQuery query =... ;
query.execute() ;
IMessageList mList = query.getResultAspect().getMessages()
if (mList.size() > 0) {
     for (int i = 0; i < mList.size(); i++) {
         IMessage mes = (IMessage) mList.getMessage(i);
      Throwable ex = (Throwable) mes.getExtension();
     ByteArrayOutputStream bAOStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
     PrintStream pStream = new PrintStream( bAOStream);
     ex.printStackTrace(pStream);
        //use bAOStream in order to show stacktrace
Regarding conceptual background about Models and Proxys:
You can find some infomation about wd model:
<a href="/people/valery.silaev/blog/2005/09/09/common-model-interface Model Interface</a>
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cef4f43e-0d01-0010-db84-ede25c874115">WQhy to use webdynpro common model interface ?</a>
I don't know about some proxies documentation. Possible it does not exist. So, there is brief information about it:
CAF data access services - comcafruntime~uicoupling DC. There is an implementation of com.sap.tc.col.client.generic.api api. These interfaces extends generic CMI interfaces. On top of CAF data access services implementation CAF designer generates typed CMI models which you finally use. For supporting of typed CMI models CAF provides additional build-in functionality GCP(generic client proxy) which directly operates over com.sap.tc.col.client.generic.api generic implementation.
I recommend you to learn CAF data access implementation and read information about CMI model. That's not huge area and it gives you necessary understanding.
Best regards,
Aliaksei
P.S. I don't recommend to learn and investigate the GCP implementation. That's just loss of time. The only thing that you need to know there is a black box layer which converts generic CMI model to typed model. Actually you can use generic model directly without typed. To do this use the following method for service facade getting:
com.sap.caf.ui.utils.cool.CAFServiceFactory.getServiceFacade() ;
but not this one:
com.sap.caf.ui.utils.cool.CAFServiceFactory.getServiceFacade(final Class modelDefinition) ;
and also do not use generated proxies at all, just use CMI api for model info setup for model nodes and other generic CMI api.

How to know the class method behind an enterprise service

Hi,
SAP has provided enterprise services for Room booking in Real Estate module. They are even shipping the complete application for a nominal price. But the standard version is not suitable for our client requirement so they want to develop this application inhouse.
Now my question is: I know the enterprise services used in this application. How to know the implementing methods behind these enterprise services ?
If possible suggest which approach will be a better option for the inhouse development.
1. Webdynpro ABAP and use directly methods behind the enterprise services.
2. Webdynpro ABAP and create client proxy class for the enterprise services.
3. Webdynpro JAVA and use the enterprise services.
4. Using visual composer modelling the application.
Please suggest the best alternative.
Best Regards,
Aleem Mohiuddin.

Hi
They are even shipping the complete application for a nominal price. But the standard version is not suitable for our client requirement so they want to develop this application inhouse.
I assume you are talking about xApps.
How to know the implementing methods behind these enterprise services ?
In sproxy transaction you can search service and then you can see class and method implemented behind that particular service.
1. Webdynpro ABAP and use directly methods behind the enterprise services.
In my opinion not recommended to bypass ES and use method behind it.
2. Webdynpro ABAP and create client proxy class for the enterprise services.
Not sure why you want to create proxy of ES.
3. Webdynpro JAVA and use the enterprise services.
4. Using visual composer modelling the application.
You can use either Webdynpro (ABAP or Java) or VC to model your application which consume ES in backend. Both options are good, you can chose Java or ABAP flavor of dynpro based on skill available in team. VC is very effective in rapid modelling and can be used in protyping or in development of complete application.
Regards,
Gourav

Web Dynpro access Application Services directly?

We're looking at implementing some processes using Guide Procedures, and I have a question about design 'style'.
I'm creating a data layer using Entity Services. The entity services will be utilized by the Application Services to create a business layer. How to do this is clear, and straightforward.
However, where I have a question is how the automatically generated Web Dynpro application (or any other Web Dynpro application, for that matter) can interact with Application Services. I've seen sample applications where the Web Dynpro application interacts with application services via mapping from the Web Dynpro interface layer through the GP Runtime - from my perspective, this looks like a good way to deal with a small amount of data being passed between the steps in the GP.
The primary Web Dynpro application will let the user interact with the data, massaging it until it's in a form where the next person needs to deal with it. I was thinking of having the Web Dynpro application interact with the Application Services layer directly to move data from the database to the web dynpro application, and back again. The only thing that would be passed between the steps in the GP would be the guid of the primary data structure. I would also expose a method of the Application Service as a CO which would take the guid and return the entire business object, so viewing screens could be constructed - as well, PDF's could be generated, and so on.
Is this considered bad form in a GP, specifically accessing Application Services directly, instead of through a step in the GP? I understand that what I want to do ties the Web Dynpro application directly to the Application Services layer, but my thinking is that the CO that encompasses the Web Dynpro should be 'atomic', in that all operations related to that specific step should be contained in a single CO. In other words, the action of creating the business object, fiddling with it, an then submitting it upstream should be contained in one CO.
Comments, suggestions?

Hi,
      In the Composite Application Framework scenario, you first create the Business Entities. These act as data holder. To fill the data within these entities the Application services are created. These application services are later exposed as a webservice and deployed.
               These webservices can contain different methods along with the CRUD operations depending on the Process Flow and Design implemented. We can import the webservices as a model in the WebDynPro Component. The UI elements of the Views can be binded to the Model. So when we execute the model methods the data gets entered into the Business objects.
               This WebDynPro component should be a callable object ( It requires some Dependencies to be added to the WebDynPro Component ). So that you can have Input/Output parameters and ResultStates. These parameters are useful if you have to pass some parameters from one view to other within the same component. So this WebDynPro Callable object includes the Application service calls and also the passing of data through the GP Input/Output Structures.
               These callable objects are then included within the Process.
This is how I think a Composite Application must be designed.

Calling operation of the exposed BO Service in another Application Service

Hi,
I am working on Composite Application development in CE7.1.
I have the following scenario:
A business object is exposed as a web service.
The web service of the business object is imported as an external service in another CA Application.
On the composite application explorer,
under the "composite application --> external --> External Services" node I can see both the operations provided from the exposed business object.
My Question: If I define an operation on the application service as implemented, how can I call the operations of the exposed business objects?
Thanks,
Yasar

Hi Yasar,
Fallow the fallowing steps.
1) First expose your BO(Exp_BO) as a web service.
2) Import that web service( (Exp_BO) as an external service in what ever project you want.
3) create an application service(eg AppService)
4) right click the imported external service and choose default mapping. select "create methodes in existing application service" and choose AppServioce.It will create the methodes with same name and map them to the Exposed BO methodes.
5)Next in the implemted method call the web service(ExpBO) methodes.
I am giving an example:
LocalInventorBO is the local BO.
Inventor is the Exposed BO.It is having a method create(inventorId).This create method dosn't return actual Inventor.But it will create InventorType.We have to use that type.
public com.hcl.ramp.types.LocalInventorBO CustomImplementedOperation(java.lang.String inventorId) throws com.sap.caf.rt.exception.CAFServiceException {
          com.sap.caf.demo_sap_com.xipvault_practice1.modeled.InventorType inventorType=this.create(inventorId);
          com.hcl.ramp.types.LocalInventorBO localInventorBO=     this.getLocalInventorBOService().create();
          localInventorBO.setInventorId(inventorType.getInventorId());
          return localInventorBO;

Problems deploying application with updated method signatures on WLS8.1

Hi,
I have an jar file under applications which I have deployed fine on WLS 8.1 in the past. I changed the method signature on one of the EJB classes in the jar. One of the parameters now takes a different Java class type. I have recompiled everyone and repackaged the jar but when I try to deploy the jar it gives me an error because the the local interface of the EJB does not have the old Java class parameter type.
I have checked the jar, classes in the jar, and the ejb-jar.xml and weblogic-ejb-jar.xml in the jar and it is looks fine. I have cleaned out my server deployment directories and verified the classpath in case the older jar was in there and everything looks OK. It seems for some reason 8.1 is caching the old ejb-jar.xml or somehow is remembering the old method signature and will not process the updated jar. Has anyone seen anything like this?
Thanks for any help or recommendations

Can you show me the error you receive?
Another simple test would be to deploy your application to a new, empty
server.
You can create a new domain as easy as this:
mkdir testDomain;
cd testDomain;
java weblogic.Server
Type in the username/password that you want and answer 'Yes' when it
asks if you want to create a new domain.
Try deploying your jar to this new domain, and let me know if it still
fails.
-- Rob
Jeff Dooley wrote:
Hi,
I have an jar file under applications which I have deployed fine on WLS 8.1 in the past. I changed the method signature on one of the EJB classes in the jar. One of the parameters now takes a different Java class type. I have recompiled everyone and repackaged the jar but when I try to deploy the jar it gives me an error because the the local interface of the EJB does not have the old Java class parameter type.
I have checked the jar, classes in the jar, and the ejb-jar.xml and weblogic-ejb-jar.xml in the jar and it is looks fine. I have cleaned out my server deployment directories and verified the classpath in case the older jar was in there and everything looks OK. It seems for some reason 8.1 is caching the old ejb-jar.xml or somehow is remembering the old method signature and will not process the updated jar. Has anyone seen anything like this?
Thanks for any help or recommendations

Changing exception clause in method signature when overwriting a method

Hi,
I stumbled upon a situation by accident and am not really clear on the details surrounding it. A short description:
Say there is some API with interfaces Foo and Bar as follows:
public interface Foo {
   void test() throws Exception;
public interface Bar extends Foo {
   void test();
}Now, I find it strange that method test() for interface Bar does not need to define Exception in its throws clause. When I first started with Java I was using Java 1.4.2; I now use Java 1.6. I cannot remember ever reading about this before and I have been unable to find an explanation or tutorial on how (or why) this works.
Consider a more practical example:
Say there is an API that uses RMI and defines interfaces as follwows:
public interface RemoteHelper extends Remote {
   public Object select(int uid) throws RemoteException;
public interface LocalHelper extends RemoteHelper {
   public Object select(int uid);
}As per the RMI spec every method defined in a Remote interface must define RemoteException in its throws clause. The LocalHelper cannot be exported remotely (this will fail at runtime due to select() in LocalHelper not having RemoteException in its clause if I remember correctly).
However, an implementing class for LocalHelper could represent a wrapper class for RemoteHelper, like this:
public class Helper implements LocalHelper {
   private final RemoteHelper helper;
   public Helper(RemoteHelper helper) {
      this.helper = helper;
   public Object select(int id) {
      try {
         return (this.helper.select(id));
      } catch(RemoteException e) {
         // invoke app failure mechanism
}This can uncouple an app from RMI dependancy. In more practical words: consider a webapp that contains two Servlets: a "startup" servlet and an "invocation" servlet. The startup servlet does nothing (always returns Method Not Allowed, default behaviour of HttpServlet), except locate an RMI Registry upon startup and look up some object bound to it. It can then make this object accessible to other classes through whatever means (i.e. a singleton Engine class).
The invocation servlet does nothing upon startup, but simply calls some method on the previously acquired remote object. However, the invocation servlet does not need to know that the object is remote. Therefore, if the startup servlet wraps the remote object in another object (using the idea described before) then the invocation servlet is effectively removed from the RMI dependancy. The wrapper class can invoke some sort of failure mechanism upon the singleton engine (i.e. removing the remote object from memory) and optionally throw some other (optionally checked) exception (i.e. IllegalStateException) to the invocation servlet.
In this way, the invocation servlet is not bound to RMI, there can be a single point where RemoteExceptions are handled and an unchecked exception (i.e. IllegalStateException) can be handled by the Servlet API through an exception error page, displaying a "Service Unavailable" message.
Sorry for all this extensive text; I just typed out some thoughts. In short, my question is how and why can the throws clause change when overwriting a method? It's nothing I need though, except for the clarity (e.g. is this a bad practice to do?) and was more of an observation than a question.
PS: Unless I'm mistaken, this is basically called the "Adapter" or "Bridge" (not sure which one it is) pattern (or a close adaptation to it) right (where one class is written to provide access to another class where the method signature is different)?
Thanks for reading,
Yuthura

Yuthura wrote:
I know it may throw any checked exception, but I'm pretty certain that an interface that extends java.rmi.Remote must include at least java.rmi.RemoteException in its throws clause (unless the spec has changed in Java 1.5/1.6).No.
A method can always throw fewer exceptions than the one it's overriding. RMI has nothing to do with it.
See Deitel & Deilte Advanced Java 2 Platform How To Program, 1st Ed. (ISBN 0-13-089650-1), page 793 (sorry, I couldn't find the RMI spec quick enough). Quote: "Each method in a Remote interface must have a throws clause that indicates that the method can throw RemoteException".Which means that there's always a possibility of RemoteException being thrown. That's a different issue. It's not becusae the parent class can throw RE. Rather, it's because some step that will always be followed is declared to throw RE.
I later also noticed I could not add other checked exceptions, which made sense indeed. Your explanation made perfect sense now that I heard (read) it. But just to humour my curousity, has this always been possible? Yes, Java has always worked that way.
PS: The overwriting/-riding was a grammatical typo (English is not my native language), but I meant to say what you said.No problem. Minor detail. It's a common mistake, but I always try to encourage proper terminology.

Complex data type to application service create method(CRUD)(Urgent)

Hi Experts,
I have created an entity service with remote persistency(Web service).i am mapping the entity service CRUD methodes to web service methodes and i am calling these CRUD methodes form the corresponding applicaion service CRUD methodes.With out complex data types both sevices are working fine.I have tested them in the service browser.
Later I have created a complex data type in the entity service and mapped it to web service.But when i am creating the application service create(CRUD) method for this entity service the complex data type which i have created in the entity service is not being shown as possible input attributes of the application service create method.Due to this i am not able to pass this complex attribute form the application service create method to the entity service create method.
Plz tell me how can i resilve this issue.(Urgent)
Thanks
Sampath.G

Hi Sampath,
Please check SAP note 1004108. I think the issue you describe is one of the limitations described in this note.
Regards,
Jan

Question about changing method signature

Hello. I've inherited some code which contains a method with the following signature:
foo(int x, MyObject myObject)
Okay, so that's not really the exact signature :) In any case, I need to modify the signature to:
foo(int x, Object myObject)
I believe that I can do this without affecting any existing client code because Obect is a superclass of MyObject. Is that right or must I deprecate the first version and add the second separately? Whatever, happens I can't break code which was compiled against the old version. Thanks in advance.
-jason

That's a good point. It's probably not an issue
however as we don't provide (supported) access to our
implementation classes. Thanks for the input.
-JasonThen I don't see another issue with it, as long as no other internally-written class has already overridden it and doesn't get changed at the same time. In a sense you're saying it's a "private" (not necessarily in the same sense of the private keyword) method, so you can change the implementation, including method signatures, at your whim.

How can I call the create method in BO from Application Service

Hello!
When I create a Business Object, CAF generates some methods automatically.
How can I call the create method in the BO from Application Service logic?
When i call the method then the entityManager and the sessionContext is NULL.
How can I initialize this?
Can anybody help me?
Thanks, Thomas

If you are using CE 7.11...
1) In the Application Services, add the BO as dependant object in dependencies tab.
2) In the implemention, add the following codes to call create method of the BO:
this.get<BO>.createMethod();
julius

Problem in Viewing Application service methods through Service Browser.

Hi All,
I have an Application Service (ReadFundDetails) which contains some Operations
1> createFundAtSA
2> updateFundAtSA
But I cant see the operations under the Application Service through service browser.
I have deployed the project in two diff server. But the same problem persists in both the server. All the class files under the jar file have been generated successfully. There is no build issue. I have undeployed the project then build and redeploy but still the problem comes.
I have another project for which i can see the Application Service operations successfully.
Regards,
Mithu

Hi Mithu,
CAF service browser is based on CAF Web Dynpro model which has several limilations. Check the SAP note <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes/sdn_oss_caf/~form/handler">1030595</a> and <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20063659-4f03-2a10-6a8a-d88786c39b71">this</a> document for more details on the limitations of CAF Web Dynpro model. To check the operations working properly create a web service for the app service test from the wsnavigator.
Thanks,
Dipankar

Problems invoking a method from a web service

Am using netbeans 6.1 and my problem is when i invoke a method from a web service that has a custom class as a return type.
When I debug the client that consumes my web service, It get Stack in this line:
com.webservice.WebServiceInfoBean result = port.getWebServiceInfo(nameSpace, serviceName, portName, wsdlURL);
i don't get any error on the console.
    static public void function1() {
        try { // Call Web Service Operation
            com.webservice.WebServiceMonitorService service = new com.webservice.WebServiceMonitorService();
            com.webservice.WebServiceMonitor port = service.getWebServiceMonitorPort();
            // TODO initialize WS operation arguments here
            java.lang.String nameSpace = "NameSpaceHere";
            java.lang.String serviceName = "WebServicePrueba";
            java.lang.String portName = "Soap";
            java.lang.String wsdlURL = "http://localhost/Prueba/WebServicePrueba.asmx?wsdl";
            // TODO process result here
            com.webservice.WebServiceInfoBean result = port.getWebServiceInfo(nameSpace, serviceName, portName, wsdlURL); // <--- here it stack
            System.out.println("getWebServiceInfo");
            Iterator i = result.getMethods().iterator();
            while (i.hasNext()) {
                MethodBean method = (MethodBean) i.next();
                System.out.print("Nombre: " + method.getname());
                System.out.print(" Returns: " + method.getreturnType());
                Iterator j = method.getparameters().iterator();
                while (j.hasNext()) {
                    ParameterBean parameter = (ParameterBean) j.next();
                    System.out.print(" ParameterName: " + parameter.getname());
                    System.out.print(" ParameterType: " + parameter.gettype());
                System.out.print("\n");
                System.out.print(method.getfirma());
                System.out.print("\n");
                System.out.print("\n");
        } catch (Exception ex) {
            ex.printStackTrace();
    }Web Service side
     * Web service operation
    @WebMethod(operationName = "getWebServiceInfo")
    public WebServiceInfoBean getWebServiceInfo(@WebParam(name = "nameSpace")
    String nameSpace, @WebParam(name = "portName")
    String portName, @WebParam(name = "serviceName")
    String serviceName, @WebParam(name = "wsdlURL")
    String wsdlURL) throws Throwable {
        //TODO write your implementation code here:
        webservicemonitor instance = new webservicemonitor();
        return instance.getWebServiceInfo(nameSpace, serviceName, portName, wsdlURL);
    }I have tested my internal code from the web service side and everything works fine. The problem occurs when i invoke it from a client side. probably I did not made the right serialization form my class WebServiceInfoBean? or am missing something. here it is:
* To change this template, choose Tools | Templates
* and open the template in the editor.
package com.beans;
import java.util.ArrayList;
* @author Tequila_Burp
public class WebServiceInfoBean implements java.io.Serializable {
     * Holds value of property wsdlURL.
    private String wsdlURL;
     * Getter for property wsdlURL.
     * @return Value of property wsdlURL.
    public String getwsdlURL() {
        return this.wsdlURL;
     * Setter for property wsdlURL.
     * @param wsdlURL New value of property wsdlURL.
    public void setwsdlURL(String wsdlURL) {
        this.wsdlURL = wsdlURL;
     * Holds value of property namespace.
    private String namespace;
     * Getter for property namespace.
     * @return Value of property namespace.
    public String getnamespace() {
        return this.namespace;
     * Setter for property namespace.
     * @param namespace New value of property namespace.
    public void setnamespace(String namespace) {
        this.namespace = namespace;
     * Holds value of property serviceName.
    private String serviceName;
     * Getter for property serviceName.
     * @return Value of property serviceName.
    public String getserviceName() {
        return this.serviceName;
     * Setter for property serviceName.
     * @param serviceName New value of property serviceName.
    public void setserviceName(String serviceName) {
        this.serviceName = serviceName;
     * Holds value of property wsdlURL.
    private String portName;
     * Getter for property wsdlURL.
     * @return Value of property wsdlURL.
    public String getportName() {
        return this.portName;
     * Setter for property wsdlURL.
     * @param wsdlURL New value of property wsdlURL.
    public void setportName(String portName) {
        this.portName = portName;
     * Holds value of property methods.
    private ArrayList methods = new ArrayList();
     * Getter for property methods.
     * @return Value of property methods.
    public ArrayList getmethods() {
        return this.methods;
     * Setter for property methods.
     * @param methods New value of property methods.
    public void setmethods(ArrayList methods) {
        this.methods = methods;
    public MethodBean getMethod(int i) {
        return (MethodBean)methods.get(i);
}by the way, everything has been worked on the same PC.

Hi Paul,
This sound familiar, but I cannot at the moment locate a reference to
the issue. I would encourage you to seek the help of our super support
team [1].
Regards,
Bruce
[1]
http://support.bea.com
[email protected]
Paul Merrigan wrote:
>
I'm trying to invoke a secure 8.1 web service from a 6.1 client application and keep getting rejected with the following message:
Security Violation: User: '<anonymous>' has insufficient permission to access EJB:
In the 6.1 client, I've established a WebServiceProxy and set the userName and password to the proper values, but I can't seem to get past the security.
If there something special I need to do on either the 8.1 securing side or on the 6.1 accessing side to make this work?
Any help would be GREATLY appreciated.

Method signature of Application Service is changed by Webdynpro

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for