Migo Gl Postings

Hi all,
I am an abaper who has been saddled with the responsibilty of doing something which i think could be done through functional customizing. My Challenge Goes thus
I have a requirement to post  an accounting entry into 2 gl accounts when a migo (Good Reciept [both posting and rversal] ) is done on a particular type of purchase order (this is apart from the normal ones which have been added by the MM person). This I did through a BDC program on F-02 and added it through an enhancement. But now, the requirement is that the DOCUMENT NUMBERs of the normal accounting entry and that of my new posting should be same so that when they click on accounting documents for that particular migo, it should display all the postings; both the normal one and that which i have just added. I have tried all i could but have not gotten a right way to do this.
I really think this could be done by customizing, but not sure, can any body please shed any light if this is possible through customization????

Dear Phemmy,
It sounds like what your users are trying to achieve is functionality called "Purchasing account management". There's switch elsewhere in FI on the company code to activate this functionality. Each time a GR is posted, the system generates additional lines (can be in the same document or in a separate document linked to the same MM document) to the "purchasing account" (process EIN in account determination trs OBYC) with the offsetting entry to the the "purchasing offsetting account" (process EKG there). It is a legal requirement in certain countries, like e.g. Belgium. Other countries if I remember right are e.g. Italy, Spain and Finland. Might be more.
In MM you can configure some details of this posting: IMG for MM -> Valuation and account assignment -> Account determination --> Without wizard -> Purchasing account management. You are welcome to read IMG notes on this node and the nodes beneath it.
Unfortunately, you can't decide from PO to PO whether to use this functionality or not. Due to the legal nature of this functionality, the switch is on the company code level.
BR
Raf
Edited by: Rafael Zaragatzky on Nov 6, 2010 6:54 PM

Similar Messages

  • BADI/User exit for MIGO fi postings

    Hello Experts,
    I have one requirement regarding at the time of MIGO accounting entry is generating based on the OBYC settings,now the client want along with this entry, want to create one more FI document through background,In the background we will give the debit g/l and credit g/l.That means at the time of MIGO two FI documents has to generate one is with OBYC setting gl's and second FI entry is from programe hard coded gl's.
    For this requirement has any BADI/USER Exit.I appriciate your valuable inputs.
    Regards,
    Nivas.

    Hi,
      May I know why you need two accounting documents?
      You may refer the similar thread: BADI / Exit required for MIGO for posting FI document
      And about the number ranges - I would suggest a custom number range object and a different number range for these additional documents.
      Also refer the doc: Methods to find Customer/User Exit's & BADi's for a Transaction Code!
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Condition not to inventorize

    Hi Everyone,
    My requirement is that I don't want to inventorize freight. In my pricing procedure standard condition type fra1 is used and is marked as accruals in m/06. Also in the procedure the condition is marked as statistical, in the accounts key FRE is given and in accruals key FR1 is given.
    Now say a PO is created for a material with 100 INR as price and fra1 is 10%.So the PO shows net price is 100 which is correct. But at the time of migo, the postings that take place are as follows,
    BSX: +110
    WRX: -100
    FR1: -10.
    So, the freight is getting inventorized.
    Also, I tried removing the accruals flag for the condition type. But in that case the postings at MIGO are as follows,
    BSX: +110
    WRX: -110
    So, in this case too freight gets inventorized.
    Can we do this ourselves or help of abaper is required.
    Also where does account key FRE come into picture.
    The matter is of utmost urgence. Your suggestions would be seriously appreciated.
    Regards.

    HI
    In M/06 for the condition type under control data - condition category - make it delivery costs and assign the freight vendor in migo to freight condition
    If u cant do tht then keep the freight condition after NAVS condition type in pricing procedure and maintain it as accruals  and also assign fre fr1 keys
    thank You

  • MIRO problem for Second Stage dealer scenario

    Hi All,
    I have created a purchase order to the trader in which i have taken Inclusive of excise tax code.
    Now while doing MIGO i have make a tick to MRP indicator also change the base value in excise tab & fill the fields of BED, ECS & HECS whatever vendor has pass on to me & post the document.
    Now in MIRO also i have change the base value & simulate the document where the extra G/L of Inventory is appearing.
    That amount is 2 % i.e. CST on GR/IR clearing amount of MIGO.
    Because of that 2% amount less credited to vendor account.
    Please help to resolve the issue.
    Regards,
    Nandkishor Nachane

    Hi,
    Since you are choosing the correct tax code @ the time of MIRO, the actual CST calculation is happening at the time of MIRO. Hence it will get posted to the inventory. Please check your MIGO/GR postings. I hope there wont be any CST calculation during GR since you have mentioned a dummy tax code in your PO.
    Hope its clear.
    As per my understanding the system behaviour is correct.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • How to set error message for 541 Movement type

    Dear gurus,
                I want to know that is it possible to set error message through any configuration? My requirement is that when we create issue document using m.t 541 it will not allow me to process that document without releasing PO document.so for that i want to set error message.
    <removed by moderator>
    Message was edited by: Jürgen L

    Hi,
       The subcontracting goods issue can be done even without PO reference. If your organization is strictly following the goods issue against PO only and you want to restrict the goods issue if the PO is not released, then you may check the below option. Please note that the below option is available in standard only from EHP 4 or above.
    1. Refer the KBA: 1915825 - Transfer Posting reference to a Purchase Order in MIGO and activate the PO reference option in MIGO - Transfer posting.
    2. Restrict the use of 541 movement in MB1B - Go to OMJJ and enter movement type as 541. Now go to "allowed transactions" folder and remove MB1B. Now the user cant use 541 in MB1B.
    3. Maintain the field - Purchase order as mandatory field for the movement type 541 in OMJJ.
    4. Train the users to use MIGO - Transfer Posting - Purchase order option for goods issue with 541 movement.
    5. If the PO is not released, system wont allow to use the PO in MIGO - Transfer Postings.
    6. If the user is selecting Transfer Posting - Other, system wont check the PO and hence it will allow to post the goods issue even if PO is not released. You may take organizational measures to restrict the usage or you may check for authorization concept - Refer the note: 773003 - MIGO: No authorization object for action/reference document
       If you are below EHP 4, there is no standard functionality available for the requirement as of my knowledge. If so, you may go for development to restrict the same.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • MIRO postings during MIGO

    Hi Friends,
    My client requirement is like this:
    During Return Delivery (MIGO - M.type:122), system should post Vendor Debit (MIRO) postings also.  They don't want to do it in two steps.
    Any user exist available in MIGO to  activate MIRO postings. 
    I couldn't convince my client.  Please throw some light.
    Regards,
    Karthi

    Thank you for your reply.
    I got a hint from SAP library which may address my requirement. (Manual LIV & Automatic Debit during return delivery) 
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/4c/92aa38ac576d1be10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    But the problem is, I couldn't found the field "Auto. debit" in vendor master.
    Can you help me in  this.
    Karthi

  • Complex headache in the PO history. Wrong postings in MIGO,MIRO

    Much appreciate if anyone could help on this issue.
    What we have done:
    we have a Purchase Order of 3 line items with the quantity in 300,200,100, respectively. the net price for each unit is $1.
    In MIGO:
    1. we posted MIGO with wrong quantity and wrong 'amount in LC' as follows:
    quantity = 1;
    'amount in LC' = $ 600
    2. we reverse this goods receipt with correct quantity and wrong 'amount in LC'.
    quantity = -1;
    'amount in LC' = $ -1
    In MIRO
    we wrongly posted the receipt as follows:
    Quantity = 350;
    Amount = $ 350
    then again, we did another wrong thing:
    we deleted the line items 2 and 3 in Purchase order in order to close the commitment in the Project.
    Now we are end up to a very bad situation:
    The invoice amount is not matched up to the PO, and
    the Project still can not be closed due to the commitment sitting in the Project WBS.
    what should we do now, experts???
    Much appreciate if you can help us out.
    Points are generousely assigned!
    Edited by: old rice on Apr 14, 2008 7:29 AM

    Now I start to reverse Goods Receipts posted against in 1st line item.
    In the PO history of 1st line item, we posted the following material documents.
    1. wrongly post MIGO as follows.
    Movement Type = 101
    quantity = 400;
    'amount in LC' = $ 400
    2. tried to reverse the wrong material document as follows, unfortunately, 'amount in LC' again is wrong.
    Movement Type = 122
    quantity = - 400;
    'amount in LC' = $ - 500
    3. Now we want to reverse step 2 using MBST, however we end up with the error message saying
    PU Ordered quantity exceeded by 400 EA. Message no. M7022.
    Diagnosis
    The specified stock level or quantity is exceeded by 400 EA.
    What should we do to cancel the wrongly reversal material doc in step2??
    In addition, we do not have idea how 'amount in LC' again is determined, because we did not put in ount in LC' = $ - 500.
    Much appreciate for your help!!
    Points are generiously given.

  • Accout postings at the time of MIGO

    Hi,
    We know that at the time of MIGO system posts Stock A/c Dr. and GR/IR account Cr.. We have some special requirement to post account at the time MIGO as follows.
    1.While posting GRN accounting flow would be [1. Stock A/c Dr. to GR / IR cr.] and [2. Purchase A/c Dr. to Increase / Decrease in stock Cr.]
    2.While Issuing material from stock flow would be [Increase / Decrease Stock Dr. to Stock Cr.]
    Thanks,
    Goutam

    Hi,
    follow the menu path mentioned below:
    SPRO > MATERIAL MANAGEMENT > VALUATION AND ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT > ACCOUNT DETERMINATION > ACCOUNT DETERMINATION WITHOUT WIZARD > PURCHASE ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT.
    1> first u have to activate the purchase account management for your company code.
    2> calculation of value for purchase account.
        here u have to activate the receipt value and if required then delivery costs for the respective valuation area and company code.
    3> in third step u if u want then u have activate seperate accounting document for the valuation area.
    the accounting entries will be:
    at gr
    stock dr
    gr/ir cr
    purchase account dr
    purchase offset account cr
    regards
    jash

  • Automatic financial postings from MIGO

    Hi Gurus,
    While automatic financial posting from MIGO/MIRO, the tax accounts (VAT on INPUTS or excise) did not post in Financial accounts as Business area is not found in automatic configurations. Will some one please help me to find where in configuration we can make business area pick up to Tax Accounts based on business area's selected for the Vendor/Materials.

    Hi Hitesh,
    MIGO is Movement type 101, go to OMWN and chek what is the Transaction key, this will decide what should be debit and credit.
    Then come to OBYC and define the account to be posted taking the combination of transaction key and valuation class.
    Then you will see the accounts are bein automatically posted to FI. Keep these account as "post automatically only"
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Bharat

  • MIGO 101 -- create one transfer requirement (TR) for several GI postings

    Hi,
    here is a problem I want to solve:
    - When we are receiving our finished goods we do several (consecutive) postings, e.g. 2x50 for a total of 100.
    - The total (100) is managed in one batch.
    - Currently we get one transfer requirement (TR) for each GR posting
    - Instead we want to cumulate all quantities posted into one TR (in order to create one transfer order from it).
    Is there a standard SPRO setting for this?
    Is there a user exit for this?
    Thanks for any hints / ideas.
    Andreas

    The problem was resolved.
    Thanks in advance

  • Automatic Batch determination in MIGO for IM movements/GI/TF Postings

    I have configured batch determination to use SLED for batches in Ascending Order.
    GRs have been done for 2 batches, one with SLED a day earlier than the other.
    Now,
    I know there is some auto batch determination for SD documents, but I want batch suggestions for IM Movements.
    I am trying to post 301 transfer to another plant, and it asks ME to enter the batch.
    How can I make the system propose the desired batch (earlier SLED) automatically?
    Thanks.

    there is no automatic batch determination in MIGO, you have to click the stock determination button

  • Error in MIGO-Postings Across GAAP not permitted

    we ar egetting above error when trying to do MIGO

    Hello,
    If you can please explain the problem you are facing, may be the message number, the process flow etc.
    Let us know whether you are reporting your figures on different GAAPs.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Change GL Account in MIGO

    Hi All,
         I have requirement. i.e.  The development of an enhancement which will automatically pull the GL account value from the purchase order and insert it into the goods receipt note (MIGO) . This enhancement will only be executed for account assigned subcontracting purchase orders only.
    During the posting of the goods receipt (movement type 101), the system should check if the purchase order against which the goods receipt is being posted was created as a subcontracting order. i.e item category (EKPO-PSTYP) = L.
    If the purchase order is for subcontracting, then the system should check if an account assignment (EKPO-KNTTP) is = K (Cost centre) or P (Project). then the system should check if the material type (MARA-MTART) is ZBTL (marketing) materials. If a subcontracting purchase order has been account assigned (K or P) and is for material type ZBTL (marketing material). The GL account (EKKN-SAKTO) copied from the Purchase Order should be used for posting the goods receipt (101) and the automatic postings using movement type 543.
      Currently the gl account is getting picked from OBYC tcode (table: T030). But now the requirement is gl account is to be  picked from PO instead of standard functionality.
      I tried implementing this requirement in Method 'LINE_MODIFY"of BADI 'MB_MIGO_BADI'. But it is not working. So is there any other badi/exit for MIGO which will do the trick. Or how can this be achieved.
      Points will probably not be awarded. Thanks in advance.
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 9, 2009 1:39 PM

    create an implicit enhancement point in function module CKMV_AC_DOCUMENT_CREATE.
    IN STRUCTURE IT_ACCIT U CAN MODIFY THE gl ACCOUNT IN RUN TIME .

  • SAP System inconsistency for Inbound delivery / MIGO and a "sap note"

    Hello Friends ,
    After following SAP instruction on how to remove the inconsistency between posting GR through MIGO (Inv. mang.) and the reflection of the goods movement status in the inbound delivery document - done that using sap note 570991
    the problem is that the system start behaving in a weird way throwing unjustified Error messages for any suggested goods receipt using MIGO with reference to inbound
    for example after creating an inbound delivery document and trying to post it via migo , an error will pop up
    - Inbound delivery storage location cannot be changed to here Message no. VLA316
    the thing is i didn't even maintain any storage location entry up to that point and yet i cannot post any stock !!
    also another error  like
    - Inbound delivery batch cannot be changed to *** here
    which doesn't make any sense because there is not batches in the inbound document !!
    i think this behavior is coming from the "Document Flow Update for Stock Postings" inbound  indicator  at the shipping parameter at client level customization
    i need help on  how to overcome this annoying SAP Bug/Problem specially i am in a post go live critical situation

    Hi,
       The messages you mentioned were introduced to avoid inconsistency between inbound delivery and IM, through the note:  1050944 - GR for inbound delivery using inventory mgmt as of ECC 6.00
       If the messages are issued incorrectly, then you may check for SAP notes (I couldnt find anything relevant) or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • CIN: Excise invoice accounting document is incorrect - MIGO

    Dear All,
    In MIGO, the Material document has two items (both are Consumables with the same chapter ID) for which the excise invoice has been posted successfully. The RG23C Part 2 register is updated correctly.
    But the accounting document so created has postings for only the second item. The posting for the first item is missing.
    We have checked for the settings for 'Multiple goods receipt, Multiple credits' in Plant Settings and also in Excise Registration which is set.
    Both the items in the Material document have the same tax code.
    We have checked for the excise GL accounts.
    The Excise GL accounts have been configured to GRPO
    We have also checked the J_1IPART2 table. and the accounting document updated with BED, AED, ECS and SeCEss amounts are correct.
    But what puzzles me is, when we check the accounting document in FB03, it has postings for only one item.
    We have checked the configurations and everything seems fine. We have simulated this situation in Quality system and it works fine, i.e .the accounting document has postings for both the items. Problem here looks like, itu2019s a manual error. Since all the tables are updated, and only the accounting part is missing, is it ok, if we create a manual accounting document?
    Can you please suggest?
    Many thanks in advance
    Vinod P

    You are saying materials are consumables and registered in RG23C.  This register is for Captial goods and not for consumables.  I think it could be RG23A.  check once again.
    Check J1ID for both materials and compare.  I am sure some of the details were missed here.  Even blank field will not allow to post
    Srinivas

Maybe you are looking for