Minimum NWDI SP Level for MSS

Hi All,
I am currently getting 2 broken DCs in the CBS when creating a track for MSS. However, in my previous experiences everything worked fine. I do notice that the NWDI system is a few SP levels below the Portal J2EE SP Level. Thus, after failing to search up concrete causes of error, I am starting to wonder if the low NWDI SP level is the cause of my headaches. I remember that there is a minimum SP level for the portal J2EE, not sure if that applies to the NWDI system.
Is there a minimum NWDI SP Level requirement for MSS SCs? Perhaps there is a note that slipped through my research?
FYI, I am importing MSS 600 SP 12 into NWDI which is SP 12. CIM has been updated and SC Dependencies are synchronized with the SLD. All the required SCs are SP 16 because the portal is at SP16. PCUIGP is SP12 matching MSS.
Thanks very much for your time!
Robert
Edited by: Robert Liu on Dec 2, 2008 4:47 PM

Robert,
This are my thoughts:
NWDI SP should not interfere with the CBS build.
New NWDI SP may be more stable or have a new feature, but it does not influence the result of the build.
Only versions of the SCs being built are involved.
Check the logs of the build.
You should be able to see exactly why component is marked as broken.
Regards,
Slava

Similar Messages

Minimum SP Level For BW 3.1 To Perform Upgrade To NW04s

Colleagues,
My customer is preparing for an upgrade to NetWeaver 2004s, and is trying to find out if there is a minimum Support Package Level for BW 3.1, in order to perform the upgrade. Does anybody know if there is a minimum SP Level they must be on (in BW 3.1) in order to be able to perform the upgrade?
Thank you in advance for any guidance you may be able to offer! -M

Hi Michael,
please check the installation / master guide in the SAP Service Marketplace (links can be find by searching this forum with the respective terms).
This shoul have the information needed.
In addition, you can check
<a href="http://service.sap.com/upgrad">SAP Service Marketplace /upgrade</a>
Cheers
SAP NetWeaver BI Organisation

Upgradation Minimum sp level & kernel level for SAP 4.7 to ECC 6.0

Hi,
We recently created a test box , copy of devolopment.
We are running on SAP 4.7 with sap_basis and sap_abap with sp level 46.
SAP 4.7 with kernel release 640 and kernel patch version 155.
Oracle 9i.
What is minimum support pack level and kernel patch level required to upgrade from sap 4.7 to ecc 6.0.
As per threads it looks like kernel patch version should be 175.
Can any one guide me with sap note which provides the info of minimum sp level and kerenl patch level.

The source system requires a certain support package level (that is described in the upgrade guides) because the tools that to the import require them.
So the easiest way is to check the upgrade guides and the mentioned notes which is the minimum support package level for the source system to start the upgrade.
The target level must be at least equivalent or higher.
Markus

Inventory Report for current stock and Safety, Minimum etc stock levels

Hi,
Is there any report available to view the current stock against the minimum, safety stock levels so that the user can plan further actions accordingly. Can anyone please guide me on this.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Laxmi

Hi Shailesh,
Is there any way we can include some extra fields into this MC.9 report - i tried but could not find anything. Can you please help.
Regards,
Laxmi

Minimum hot package level required of release 3.1H for upgrade to 4.6c.

Hi,
What should be the minimum hot package level of release 3.1H when upgading to 4.6c.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Ashok

when you perform PREPARE system you will provide you a report on kernel, tp, r3trans, support pack etc.
cheers,
-Sunil

What minimum Support Package level is needed in BW 3.5 / 640 to be able to

Hello Experts,
A quick question:
what minimum Support Package level is needed in BW 3.5 / 640 to be able to run the SAPGUI 7.10 (including BW add-ons)?
I am also searching at my end.
<removed_by_moderator>
Read the "Rules of Engagement"
Best Regards
Sachin Bhatt
Edited by: Juan Reyes on Jun 29, 2009 11:15 AM

Hi,
Refer the below link
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=30625
A. FEP stands for Front-End Patch. FEPs are the patches that SAP releases for the BW front-end components of the SAP GUI.
They can be downloaded from the SAP Service Marketplace (SMP login required), browsing to the following locations:
BW 3.5 Addon can be found at Downloads -> SAP Support Packages and Patches -> Entry by Application Group -> SAP Frontend Components -> BI ADDON FOR SAPGUI -> BW 3.5 ADDON FOR SAPGUI 7.10-> Win32.
BW 7.0 Addon can be found at Downloads -> SAP Support Packages and Patches -> Entry by Application Group -> SAP Frontend Components -> BI ADDON FOR SAPGUI -> BI 7.0 ADDON FOR SAPGUI 7.10-> Win32.
Let us know if u have any issues.
Regards,
Ravi

Report at Material level(for all the plants)?

Hi Experts,
We have simple query which gives following output.
&Plant&Material No&Creation Date&Issue date&QTY issued&
P1      M1         01/10/2004    01/01/2005        10
P2      M1         01/12/2004    15/12/2004        20
P3      M1         01/01/2005    15/01/2005        30
Actually I want to report at material level ( for all plants in one shot ) , additionaly I want to show the minimum creation date for that material and minimum issue date and sum of all 3 qty issued.
The output should look like
&Material No&Creation Date&Issue date&QTY issued
M1           01/10/2004    15/12/2004       60
Can any body suggest how do i get the date fields with the above condition
Thanks in advance.
Regs,
Mahantesh

Hi Mahantesh ,
Try this:
Take two more KFs in the cube.
1) Creation Date as KF
Type: Date
Exception aggregation : First value
Aggregation reference : 0material.
2) Issue Date as KF
Type: Date
Exception aggregation : Last value
Aggregation reference : 0material.
In the query take 0material in rows and above 2 KF in the columns (May be , here , you need restriction also. 'Creation Date as Characterstic' > 01.01.1000 ,Issue Date as characterstic' < 31.12.9999 )
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

R/3 Patch level for SAP BW 3.5

I all could you send me information about the minimum sap r/3 patch level for BW 3.5?
thanks a lot...

Hi,
You would find the info on http://service.sap.com/instguides based on the OS and the database.
Bye
Dinesh

Upgrade to CRM 2007: minumun service pack level for other components

Hi all,
I have to upgrade my CRM 5.0 to CRM 2007. CRM is connected to ECC 6.0 and SCM 5.0. What are the minimum SP level for those component? Is there any link to documentations about mandatory SP for not CRM components?
Thanks a lot.

Hello
In the CRM 2007 Master Guide which is available in the [SAP Service Marketplace|http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000704565&] I found that SAP ERP 6.0 EHP 3 is recomended and SAP R/3 4.6C SP 53 is the minimum version. No special version is mentioned for SCM 5.0.
Best regards
Gregor

Support Pack level for upgrade

Hi All,
We are upgrading from R/3 4.7 to ECC 6.0, can anybody provide me Support Pack level for SAP_ABA, SAP_BASIS etc. before starting upgrade.
I have gone through lot of OSS notes but not getting exact SP level.
Regards,
Sachin

I depends on
- what upgrade package you use (SR1, SR2, SR3)
- the SP level of the source system
The upgrade guide tells you the minimum SP level needed to do the upgrade.
If you use the new CD/DVD set, the system will be upgraded to SP 12 (BASIS, ABA, SAP_APPL).
If you backup your wage tables before the upgrade (as described in the installation guide) you can also go to the highes SP level for SAP_HR.
Markus

Custom FPM Application for MSS

Hi folks,
I am trying to create some custom portal pages for MSS that will contain the Employee Search and other iViews based on the Generic iView List and/or Generic iView Table templates.
The Business Package document for MSS (mySAP ERP) says that I have to create a new delta-linked FPM Application and assign the required views to the perspective, which I have done via the Self Service Administrator role.
The problem is, when I then try to create the new WebDynpro Java iViews, I can't see my FPM Application or views in the list.
I am aware that I can just add extra views to the standard FPM Applications for MSS, but I really don't want to risk having those overwritten by support packs later on.
Has anyone successfully done this before?
Regards,
John

btw, I was kidding about the creators of the old FPM sitting in the corner
When the new Java based ESS/MSS screens first came out they were so much better than the old IAC's, and we were very grateful for that. We used them extensively where they could just be deployed "out of the box".
Once we figured out how to integrate our own generic query iViews into the FPM framework for MSS we used lots of those too.
I guess in a way they were too successful, and as a result the business kept demanding more and more self service applications that often weren't delivered as standard.
Not being a Java shop (i.e. zero Java developers) we soon found that there was only so far we could go with the standard WDJ services. Even something relatively simple like adding another standard field to a standard ESS screen without going down the NWDI path proved to be a rather frustrating process (for us at least), so we just started buidling our own with WDA.
From a functional perspective, I don't really care if an application has been built in Java or Abap, as long as it does what I want, every time. I can't see us going back and changing the standard Java services that we still use over to Abap, but for future developments the reality for us and lots of other customers is WDA.
cheers.
John

Service pack level & PI basis level for MAM3.0

Hi All,
We are trying to configure our server with MI2.5 and MAM3.0. Can anybody please tell us what are the levels of the service pack and PI basis levels must be there to work with MAM3.0.
Below are the details of the current service pack level and PI BASIS levels of our server.
SAP_BASIS          640     0020     SAPKB64020          SAP Basis Component
SAP_ABA          640     0020     SAPKA64020          Cross-Application Component
ST-PI          2005_1_640     0003     SAPKITLQH3     SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
PI_BASIS     2005_1_640     0012     SAPKIPYJ6C          Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) 2005_1_640
SAP_BW          350     0020     SAPKW35020     SAP_BW 350
PI          2004_1_500     0012     SAPKIPZI6C          PI 2003_1_470 : Add-On Delta Upgrade
<i><b>Note: our Middleware and Backend both are in the same server.</b></i>
Your help in this regard is highly appreciated and rewarded too.
Regards,
Murthy

Hi Murthy,
MAM 3.0 backend minimum requirements are:
R/3 4.6C (minimum SP53) with SAP R/3 Plug-in 2004.1 (Minimum SP13)
R/3 4.7 (Minimum SP 27) with SAP R/3 Plug-in 2004.1 (Minimum SP13)
ERP 2004 (Minimum SP11) with SAP R/3 Plug-in 2004.1 (Minimum SP14)
ERP 2005 (Minimum SP6), no Plug-in required
Please be aware that you will need to apply quite a few notes even if you are on the latest SP level for any of this backends.
MAM 3.0 central note references backend central notes for various supported backend. You should take care that appropriate note is analysed and all notes are implemented.
Regards,
larissa Limarova

Getting error while opening a saved for later notification: The selected action is not available. The cause may be related to security. Contact your system administrator to verify your permission level for this action.

Hi All,
While opening a saved for later notification, we are getting "The selected action is not available. The cause may be related to security. Contact your system administrator to verify your permission level for this action". error.
This is a custom notification.
Please help.
Thanks
Raghava

HI All,
Please help on this issue.
Thanks
Raghava

Logical level for logical fact table sources

it is clear that for fact aggregates, we should use the Content tab of the Logical Table Source dialog to assign the correct logical level to each dimension.
question is : is it mandatory to assign even for non-aggregates fact tables the logical level for each dimension (which normally should be set to the most detailed level of each dimension) ? is it any known issue if "logical levels"in content tab are not set ?
the reason I'm asking this is a strange bug I have (I'm not going to discuss it here) and then only workaround seems to be NOT setting the logical levels (on content tab) for logical fact table sources.
thank you !

If levels are not set: By default levels are considered as lowest level
It should not matter if you set or not
Generally we set for facts explicitly when we are using Aggregate tables.
Your current issue might be a case by case; I would suggest to check implicit fact, any table mapped to the source to force a join etc
Mark if helps
Let me know how it helps
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Feb 5, 2013 8:33 AM
Any updates on this?+_
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Feb 14, 2013 9:09 AM

Unable to get the composite instance for the invocation. This could be because instance has not yet been created or because the audit level for the SOA infra has been set to Off

I am on Oracle 11.1.1.7 BPM suite on W8 64 bit. I can't launch the flow trace and get the error "Unable to get the composite instance for the invocation. This could be because instance has not yet been created or because the audit level for the SOA infra has been set to Off". I have set the audit level to development at the soa-infra>SOA Administration> Common Properties > Audit level set to development and Capture Composite Instance State is Checked.
Can somebody advice.
Thanks

Can you please confirm me the following steps...
Log in to the EM console, Expand soa-infra (soa_server1) , go to the partition where your composite is been deployed, Click on your composite, On the right, click on the dropdown Settings and choose Composite Audit Level. you can choose to set the Audit Level for this composite. If you choose Inherit, it will take the settings to what the server is being set to. Otherwise, we can override it by choosing Off, Production, or Development.
Make sure your setting for that composite is not Off, keep inherit or production or development.
Thanks,
N

Minimum NWDI SP Level for MSS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for