MIRO : Final Invoice Indcator not setting committment amount to zero

Hi,
We have situations when goods receipts for some of items is not possible and when PO is paid we manually set Final Invoice indicator in MIRO. PO sitll show committment items and we want these removed.
Is there is any user exits , which can set committment balance to zero if Final Invice Indicator is set in MIRO?
Regards,
Saeed

Hi,
Do you input quantity( Amount 0 ) in MIRO?.
Regards,
Gaito

Similar Messages

Final Invoice indicator not set for limt PO though same done in SRM system

Hi,
We are closing Standard and Limit PO through a program in SRM system. For standard PO it's working fine (the Final Invoice flag in ERP system is set checked with WBS element blocked), however when it come to Limit PO, it's giving an error message and not updating Final Invoice flag for the same WBS element though we have updated the final invoice flag in BBP_PDIGP as well as BBP_PDLIM tables in SRM system through the program.
Regards,
Ni3

Hi,
The error message I am getting is "User status LFI is active (WBS E.000804.02.02)" where in standard PO the same WBS is referred still the PO is getting closed.
PS: I do not wish to create any customization.
Regards,
Ni3

Final Issue Indicator not set in maitnenance order after ECC 6.0 upgrade

Hi,
We encounter this problem after upgrading to ECC6.0 from SAP R/3 4.6C
Final issue indicator (RESBD-KZEAR) is not being set in maintenance order (IW33) for sub-component non-stock items in General Data page
Would be great if anyone could guide in this regard
Detailed Scenario:
1) Maintenance Order is created (IW31) is created in plant A
2) For non-stock items, reservation created by maintenance order creates a purchase requisition
3) Account Assigned STO (against maintenance order) is created from purchase requisition
4) Transfer Posting done from Plant B (351 movement) for complete qty
5) GR at Plant A done (101 movement) for complete qty.
6) Final Issue Indicator is not set in General Data page eventhough the complete quantity is delivered.
Thanks
Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 8:59 PM
Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 9:00 PM
Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 9:03 PM

Hi,
Please check in the STO if the "Delivery completed" indicator is checked or not?
If Yes, then search some correction notes of SAP and get it implemented or raise OSS message with SAP to get the Final Issue indicator to be set in maintenance order.
If No, then ask your MM consultants to investigate that. They can check the config of "Goods Receipt" Or check if the total quantity GR has been done Or some Under delivery/ Over delivery tolerance has been maintained.
Thanx.
Nilmoni.

MM - Final Invoice

Do anyone know if it is possible to set (and where) the "Final Invoice" indicator in MIRO ??
That is to say. First i enter a PO (ME21N), then i receive material or services (MIGO - ML81N) then when i want to enter the first invoice in MIRO the "Final Invoice" indicator is set in default. I don´t want this. I want the user have to mark this indicator if they have to.
Thanks !
Dalmiro

Steve,
Thank again for your quick answer.
I´m not sure if there is a modification or a user exit. I don´t think so.
Yes i´m sure about the "Final Invoice" indicator at positions level in MIRO (DRSEG-EREKZ).
When you said ""the account assignment categories control if the "Invoice receipt" flag is set or not"" you mean in ME21N ??
I´d been looking in customizing for a long time. I also think that is logic that ir i do the MIGO (101) for the total quatity, when i go to MIRO the "final invoice" indicator is set.
Do you know if there is any way of treating this differently according to the item category (MEPO1211-EPSTP)
thanks again.
Dalmiro

Final invoice tick on Purchase order

Hi Friends,
Production order mentioned in the purhcase order is having TECO status. If I go to me22n & tick final invoice I am able to save the PO without any error.
We have made custom program to tick final invoice for mass POs using bapi for PO change but we are getting error message that Procution order against PO is having status TECO.
If I go to me22n & click on account assignment tab then I am not able to set final invoice tick. So in me22n I am getting diffferent behaviours as it able to save me po & if i click on account assignment it does not allow.
So what should be ideal case should it be able to final invoice or not. So that In custom program I can change this error message of Production order TECO to convert to warning message.
Thanks,
Kiran

Hi Kiran,
I think that there is some user exit getting called in place where you have issues. Ideally the final invoice should never check the order as the order can be in teco during invoicing.
I suggest you to debug it using your ABAPer as the signs are of some code inconsistency. The results are different when you directly click the final invoice and click after once seeing the account assignment,
Regards
Vivek Singh

Need to find final invoiced contracts

Hi,
There is requirement in code where I have contract account and I want to find howmany contracts of this CA are final billed and invoiced.
From ERDK, I can find the final invoice but how to decide that which contracts are included in this final invoice.
is it possible that contract does not have "03" type final bill but has "06" manual bill and final invoice is created on CA with these bills!?
Also help me understand the concepts. Suppose CA has 2 joint contracts, one is active and once is moved out. When System gets final read of contract-2. It will generate final bill.
Now the invoice that gets created on CA is called "final invoice" or not (as it will include final bill of contract-2) ??
Or it is not called final invoice (as it will include periodic bill of contract-1) ??
Thanks,
Murtuza

Hi,
As per my knowledge billing transaction "06" is created for the final bill order at the time of move out and thus when you bill that order and later invoice this billing transaction progressively moves on to the print doc and stored in ERDK.
So it is not possible that a manual bill will be considered as final bill based on which the final invoice will be generated. Although I have not experienced such scenario.
Regards,
S

How to set propose final invoice amount indicator in MIRO document

Hi,
How to set propose final invoice amount indicator in MIRO document as similar to FB60 Editing options indicators.
Regards

Hi,
You can not. Having such an indicator would make no sense in MIRO.
Kind regards

Invoice posting possible for limit PO although final invoice is set

Hi,
I encountered a strange behavior, I think.
I created a limit PO and posted several invoices against it. So far, so good.
Then, I wanted to "close" the limit PO and set the "Final invoice" indicator in PO. Even though, I was able to post further invoices against this PO. Shouldn't this be prevented?
I used the workaround to modify the PO and change the expected value to the actual value of invoices posted against the PO... But why does final invoice flag have no effect at all? Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
The purpose of final invoice indicator is to reset the purchase order commitments. The final invoice indicator does not prevent further invoices from being posted. Please see F1 help documentation on this field.
You can block the item if further processing is required.
Kind Regards,
Suneet

Duplicate Invoice Check Not Checking the Gross Invoice Amount-

Gurus,
When checking for duplicate invoices in MIRO/FB60, I have made all the config and setup but still the system is not checking the gross Invoice amount field. Lets say I enter
Invoice 1 :
                 Vendor                 X
                  Reference            123
                  Date                    10/27/2010
                  Company Code : 1111
                  Currency           : USD
                  AMOUNT           :100         and post this invoice
I try to enter the second invoice
Invoice 2:
                   Vendor                 X
                  Reference            123
                  Date                    10/27/2010
                  Company Code : 1111
                  Currency           : USD
                  AMOUNT           : 90
I get the error message even though the AMOUNT in the second invoice is 90 which is not the same as first invoice .
I chcked the vendor master duplicate check, made the config in spro-liv for duplicate invoice for company code, reference number and invoice date.
The help says that after 4.6 version if all of them match, then the system wiill throw error, but in my case the amount is not matching and its still giving me an error.
Kindly help..<< Moderator message - Please do not offer points >>
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 27, 2010 4:07 PM

Hi,
After making the duplcate invoices chek at spro will checks the reference number of the invoice entered previouslu with that one entered later for that company code.as the first check itself failed system throws the error thinking, you are trying to enter a duplicate invoice for a already posted invoice though how much is the amount in the second invoice .
It will allow to enter the item details , if the dupplicate invoice check is properly configured for that company code and ref number .Did you get the error mesage after entering the details?If you get a error a message which stops furthur entry them your conf is correct, if not you may need to check back .
Check the invoice toletrances at spro too amount.
the below link explains you the process of dupliation in LIV.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/ce/4f3e39ea3aee02e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Regards,

Amount to draw from down payment is not set in document currency

hi,
i always get the error "amount to draw from down payment is not set in document currency" when i try to update a draft of invoice with down payment.
i do the following:
1. sales order
2. down payment
3. income payment
4. delivery note
5. invoice
5.1 save as draft by di api
5.2 get draft by key
5.3 do some changes, for example change comments by di api
5.4 update draft by diapi <--- the error is thrown!
If i do this on screen everything works fine. But by sdk its not working.
System: SAP 8.8 SP00 PL20
Is there a solution for this problem?
best regards
Markus

Hi Markus,
What if you update the same draft from UI instead of by diapi? Do you still get error message?
Thanks,
Gordon

Freight Charges after Final Invoice(MIRO)

Hi SAP Gurus,
We have received one freight invoice after accounting of final invoice.
How can we pay this freight amount to the vendor via same PO which has been fully invoiced.
Thanks & Regards.
Anil Thakur

Probably frieght condition type might be greyed out.
So you can do subsequent debit for same p.o to value of freight. Then pay freight vendor(F-53 or F-58) using invoice.
or
Invoice without purchase order,add g/l account tab(In MM--> LIV) in MIRO,enter freight g/l account,amount you want to pay.
Post invoice,pay freight vendor
or
Post it using g/l account in FB60.

Set the final invoice flag for a purchase order

I want to know how to set the final invoice flag for a purchase order.
I tried BAPI_PO_CHANGE but it is giving me error.
Help me.

Hi,
I think ur BW report shows the cleared Invoice no. The second invoice no. might not have been extracted to BW system. Check your order no. in Cube whether it has two invoice nos.
Regards,
Suman

My ipad does not have the amount of GB on the back and in the settings it says 56gb! Also there is no setting called regulatory. It is an ipad 4 retina w wifi that i got as a Christmas present. Could it be a fake? How can i tell?

My ipad does not have the amount of GB on the back and in the settings it says 56gb! Also there is no setting called regulatory. It is an ipad 4 retina w wifi that i got as a Christmas present. Could it be a fake? How can i tell?

The amount of storage that is shown on the box and in Settings are calculated differently - the package uses 1 billion bytes as a gig (i.e. decimal), whereas in Settings it's shown as the binary definition : http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2419
Also some space has been used for iOS, the built-in app and some space is lost due to formatting.

FEATURE REQUEST, Deduct not payed down payment from final invoice

An AR Downpayment invoice that is not yet due or paid when the final invoice is made, will not be deducted, and you will not be able to take these down payments in to account when the Final invoice is made.
This request is that we would like a check box or similar that makes is possibel to calculate final invoice based on selected or all downpayments regardles if they are paid or not.
The oil industry has several month's payments terms, and in many cases the down payments have a due date that exceeds the date when the final invoice is created.
So when the final invoice is created, and you recieve the messages "One or more payments that are linked to the base document(s) have not been paid. Continue?" (se attatchment) it should be possible to choose if you want to deduct these (some or all)down payments or not.
Then Down_payment invoice should remain open for incomming payments at the cutomers Account balance.

Hi,
Please repost as above query as discussion with question type to get quick assistance.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Baseline date not default in MIRO for Invoices posted against STO Pu.Order

Hi All,
Baseline date doesn´t default in MIRO for Invoices posted against an STO Purchase Order.
We are trying to post an Invoice in MIRO with reference to a STO Purchase Order for planning delivery cost.
Delivery cost in PO has not got the Vendor number because conditions are customized not possible to process manually so in MIRO the system asks to enter the Invoicing Party and then the baseline date.
The client requires that when the invoicing party is enter manually in MIRO, the term of payment should be pick up from Vendor Master Record.
Could someone confirm if this possible ?
Thanks and regards,
Laura

Hi Laura ,
The payment terms in Invoice are taken from PO only .
Refer SAP Note : 177224 for more details.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

MIRO : Final Invoice Indcator not setting committment amount to zero

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for