Baseline date not default in MIRO for Invoices posted against STO Pu.Order

Hi All,
Baseline date doesn´t default in MIRO for Invoices posted against an STO Purchase Order.
We are trying to post an Invoice in MIRO with reference to a STO Purchase Order for planning delivery cost.
Delivery cost in PO has not got the Vendor number because conditions are customized not possible to process manually so in MIRO the system asks to enter the Invoicing Party and then the baseline date.
The client requires that when the invoicing party is enter manually in MIRO, the term of payment should be pick up from Vendor Master Record.
Could someone confirm if this possible ?
Thanks and regards,
Laura

Hi Laura ,
The payment terms in Invoice are taken from PO only .
Refer SAP Note : 177224 for more details.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Similar Messages

  • Baseline date not getting populated from SRM invoices posted to ECC 6.0

    Hi,
    We are currently in ECC 6.0. The SRM system is in 4.0. We have this particular problem that the baseline date is not getting populated from the Invoices posted from the SRM. The baseline date is blank and the document is saved.
    Did anyone face the same problem??? Can you please refer SAP note 541934 and expand........
    Thanks
    Aravind
    Edited by: Aitipamula Aravind on Aug 10, 2009 5:13 AM

    Hello,
    Yes, you could check the attached note 541934 and regard the implementation of the field ZFBDT in the invoicing document.
    Note 541934 provides a solution how to achieve the MM-customizing for payment baseline dates getting effective for invoices with SRM-origin. This note needs to be applied at your ERP-MM-side in the former plug-in-layer. As described in the note, this is a modification. It's recommended to apply in non-productive system first.
    Hope the above infor.are helps for you!
    Best Regards,
    Gladys xing

  • Baseline date not flowing in MIRO transaction

    Hi
    Baseline date not flowing in MIRO while doing transaction.
    We have maintained Payment terms in vendor master record
    and payment terms maintained in PO also.
    We have done the GR posting.
    please help
    Thanks and regards
    Aakash

    Are you use an MIRO with amount split? and does your payment term is configured with "No Default Date'? Then refer to OSS 495303.

  • Message change for invoice amount against Purchase order

    Hi Experts ,
    In MIRO , While invoice posting against a purchase order , when enter is pressed after supplying posting date amount
    Purchase order no and line item no , a message appears : downpayments against vendor xxx exists giving total amount against the vendor indicated in purchase order .
    Can message be changed and amount against that particular purchase order only be displayed instead of against vendor , because same vendor can have multiple purchase order by using any enhancement .
    Thanks
    SA

    Hi SA ,
    i think u are getting this from from ur User Exits only , trace this message based on the message No.
    in standard MIRO u wont get this kind of messages.
    regards
    Prabhu

  • Best practice for invoice posting inSRM

    Dear expert,
    what is the best practice for posting an invoice? Is it in SRM system or MM system? In SRM, the system allows one to use approval procedure for invoice posting; wheras in MM, one cannot use the apporval procedure to post an invoice. similar is the case, in SRM-SUS and MM-SUS scenario?
    I would appreciate if you can feedback on the industry practice.
    thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

    Ranjan,
    As a SAP customer we use invoice entry in ERP using MIRO and FB60 as these are the most efficient for our busines.
    1. Invoice entry using MIRO tcode is faster as it can be done with minimal use of the mouse.  Invoice entry is slower in SRM as browser response and interactions with the backed ERP system slows the systems reponse to the user input.  Repeated use of a mouse in the SRM browser is detrimental to fast input.
    2. Not all types of invoices can be handled in SRM e.g. Invoice without PO.
    3. We process approx 20,000 invoices per month with multiple input operators, SRM could not handle that sort of load.
    4. SRM is really a procurement application and although invoice entry is included it is probably more for users who wish to use SRM in a stand alone scenario.  We use extended classic so all our financial transactions take place in the ERP backend.
    Your choice also depends upon the number and quality of the invoices you plan to process, and the need for the operators to be trained on one or two systems.
    Hope these personal observations assist with your decision
    Regards
    Allen

  • Input Excise SHECess not showing in MIGO & Excise Invoice posting, where I made a mistake ?

    Input Excise SHECess not showing in MIGO & Excise Invoice posting, where I made a mistake ?
    1.At the Time of MIGO,In Excise Invoice tab SECess Hide in reight side of the Screen
    2. At the time of J1IEX, Complete Input Excise SECess Line item is not appere in screen
    Please give the solution
    Regards
    Maran

    Hi,
    Please check following :
    1. Whether the AT1 indicator is active for Excise Registration number under CIN customizing
    Path
    IMG --> Logistics - General --> Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Basic Settings --> Maintain Excise Registrations
    2. Whether the AT1 condition is maintained in Maintain Excise Defaults against tax procedure
    Path
    IMG --> Logistics - General --> Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Basic Settings --> Determination of Excise Duty --> Maintain Excise Defaults
    3. Whether the AT1 condition is maintained in Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction against excise transaction type
    Path
    IMG --> Logistics - General --> Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Account Determination --> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
    4. Whether the AT1 G/L account is maintained in Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Path
    IMG --> Logistics - General --> Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Account Determination --> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    5. Check whether in condition for AT1 is maintained in FV11.
    6. Check whether AT1 setoff percentage is maintained (this is applicable only in case you maintain setoff conditions).
    7. Check whether AT1 percentage is maintained in conditions tab of Purchase Order.
    8. Check whether tax code is maintained in FV11 for AT1 condition maintained.
    Please check and revert in  case of any clarifications.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • MIGO not displaying GOITEM-SGTXT for new posting

    Hi All,
    MIGO not displaying GOITEM-SGTXT for new posting
    last year postings SGTXT  is visible,
    while checking in customer exits there is no no code.
    I want to make it visible GOITEM-SGTXT.
    Plz help.
    Thanks
    Saket

    Hi guru's,
    I have similar issue with MIGO Material Doc display,
    The screen field GOITEM-SGTXT on the 'Where' tab is not displaying for current year ,
    Previous years the Text field is displaying with the data.
    GOITEM-SGTXT is getting the data from ML18N ,  ESSR-TXZ01 as the text is not entering through MIGO.
    I checked the customer exit and the BADI's for the MIGO , but not activated for manipulating the
    GOITEM-SGTXT.
    Please give me an idea what makes this issue.
    System Details:
    ECC 5.0
    SAP_APPL - 5.0     Logistics.
    SAP_ABA -  6.40   Cross-Application Component
    Thank you

  • Withholding tax for Invoice posting

    My client has WHT set up for payments in Mexico but they also want to set that up for Invoice posting, should I create new Tax type and code for that? And also to which accounts I need to define that type & code?
    I am confused. Please help.
    Thanks,
    ST

    Hi S T
    Withholding tax can be at two types
    * Withholding tax at the time of invoice posting
    * Withholding tax at the time of payment
    As you have withholding tax at the time of payment, if you want WHT at the time of invoice also, then you have to create type and codes under that
    Kindly let us know if you need any help further
    Thanks
    Prasad

  • MIRO - Invoices posted against a Purchase Type

    Hi Experts ,
    My client needs a report of MIRO - Invoices posted against a Purchase Type. Can I get this from a standard report.
    Thanking you in Advance,
    Arabinda

    HI<
    report ME80FN execute report and select change icon and then select PO history you will get report PO-MIGO-MIRO
    or
    MIR5
    or MIR6
    or try MIR4
    or table in se16n t-code RBKP and RSEG
    EKBE
    Regards
    Kaials Ugale

  • Baseline date not as default setting

    HI all,
    payment term Z000 has default baseline date as posting date.
    upon entry, doc date = 01.01.2006, posting date = 31.01.2006 BUT baseline date picks up 01.01.2006.
    what other setting did the system checks?
    thanks.

    Hi
    in customising  for terms of payment you must set for default for baseline date
    the  posting date and
    not the document date
    this is the reason for the problem
    BR Tarik

  • Migo reference document not appearing in miro for frieght conditions

    Dear all,
    I ahve done migo for a po and i have checked GR based invoice in PO.When i am doing MIRO i am not getting the migo reference number for frieght condition where as the migo reference number is appearing for base price.How to get that migo reference number for frieght conditions also.
    thanks in advance
    regards
    vithal

    Sometimes the the MIGO creator might have reversed the same. In such cases the reversal document may be with different number in the same series and both posted & reversed documents will not appear in MIRO. Since you might checking with posted document number, you are seeing the blank in MIRO. In such cases, just enter the PO number in MIRO, give date & reference number press Show PO structure button in the left corner. You will find the following screen
    Expand the required once. The following screen appears. In this both positive & negative numbers with same reference & document type appearing are the reversed documents.
    Hope this is clear

  • Baseline Date not chaning using BADI FAGL_SET_SEGMENT

    If someone has worked with this badi FAGL_SET_SEGMENT, can you please help.
    I'm trying to change the baseline date for the vendor invoice created using FB60.  I implemented the above BADI and changed the value of Baseline Date and Cash discount days based on the business logic. But the change is not reflecting in the document.
    Please help.
    Thank you.

    I understand the proposed solution but I do not think this should be a custom coding requirement.  The underlying assumption of the invoice payment term is that goods / services have been delivered.  The transfer of title should be a configurable trigger for the vendor payment baseline date.  Many consumer goods are shipped FOB to the customer destination with a 3-4 week shipping timeline.  Normal payment terms run 30-45 days.  We want our baseline date to start when the title transfers.  I can understand the GR document does not take the place of a proof of delivery but it is much closer to the the point where we actually transfer title then when we normally receive the invoice (2 days after vendor shipment).  Of course I have been through the argument that the invoice document date should be manipulated but I do not buy into it because it envokes a form of dispute management on a standard flow.  Initially I went down the path of GR based IV which follows the same logic as above for the release of ultimate payment.  I am confused as to why the standard solution does not provide an equivalent configuration for baseline date computation.  Can anyone explain why this is the case or whether I am just missing something obvious?

  • Baseline date change after the creation of invoice list

    When I create invoice document, the invoice date (vbrk-fkdat) is the end of the month and the invoice list date (VBRK-FKDAT_RL) is the next business day after the invoice date, the baseline date of the accounting document (bseg-zfbdt) is the document creation date and this is what I wanted.
    However, when I start to create the invoice list, the baseline date on the accounting document (field bseg-ZFBDT) is changed to the invoice list date. Does anyone know why and how to fix and where to look in the configuration to see how invoice list date (vbrk-fkdat_rl) is populated? It seems to me that the baseline date default back to the invoice list date when invoice list document is created. Thanks for your help.  I also posted this question in the ERP Financial thread.

    Hi Valerie,
    do you recall the User Exit?
    Thanks

  • VAT should post based on PO date or GR date not based on MIRO posting date

    Hi,
    Based on posting date in Invoice(MIRO) & condition record validity period, VAT is calculated & posting on invoice posting.
    Condition record for VAT condition type with tax code(T9):
    01.01.2011 to 31.01.2011-------> 4%
    01.02.2011 to 28.02.2011------->12%
    01.03.2011 to 31.03.2011------->14.5%
    PO created and GR done on February & invoive done on March and syatem calculated VAT amount perfactly based on validity period maintained in condition recod and invoice posted.
    But requirement is  system should post invoice VAT amount as mentioned in the PO ( based on PO date) or GR date to post during Invoice posting in MIRO
    Regards,
    Biju K

    Hi,
    Any other input?
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • ADC for Domestic Purchase not flowing in MIRO for particular MIGO Document

    Hello Experts,
        We've a scenario in which we pay ADC to domestic vendor. The procedure we follow is as below:
              1. Condition record for JAOP with 0% rate maintained in FV12.
              2. PO created with JMOP 10%, 2% ECS, 1% SECS & 4% VAT.
              3. During MIGO (also excise invoice capture), AED value is maintained
              4. After J1IEX, at the time of MIRO this ADC along with other duties flows in simulation
        Now in my case, there are number of GR documents for which MIRO is performed, but for particular GR, ADC is not flowing in MIRO and also excise duty is incorrect, it's not flowing from GR.
       So what is the probable solution for this, I've already checked MIGO & excise invoice documents & found to be ok.
    Thanks in advance
            Amit

    Hi,
    Have you maintained material price including AED price??
    If yes then check whether you have maintained JAX1-100% or not?
    I think this should be treated as a dealer purchase as you are maintaining 0% amount for JAOP.
    Regards,
    Piyush

Maybe you are looking for