MIRO No Proposal of PO line item

Hi All,
I am working on ECC 6.0. I enter an invoice with tx miro. I enter the purchase order and I press enter. The system doesnt propose the line items.
In R/3 4.6C if you enter the PO, the system proposed the line items.
What can I do to solve the problem?
Thanks.
Julieta

Hi,
Check the Company code where the Purchase order is created.
In the Transaction MIRO goto edit in the menu bar and select switch company code
there the system will ask you to enter the company code do this before entering the Purchase order,
Check these also
1) whether the PO is for Services for that first you need to Process the Service entry sheet then you can do MIRO
2) Whether GR based IV has been defined for this PO line items.
3) In the PO check whether the Invoice receipt is ticked or not.
So check and confirm,
rgds
Chidanand

Similar Messages

Substitution for MIRO Business Area for tax line items

Hi All,
Our business requirement is updation of BA in tax line items during MIRO transaction. To fulfill this requirement i have written a substitution with user exit. Business user enters BA in bktxt . In user exit iam passing bktxt field to bseg-gsber. But BA is not updating in tax line items. Here iam giving the code which i have written in my user exit. Pls guide me what to do aprt from this.
IF bkpf-bktxt IS NOT INITIAL.
    t_gsber = bkpf-bktxt.
ENDIF.
IF bseg-hkont EQ '0000098511' OR bseg-hkont EQ '0000098521' OR bseg-hkont EQ '0000098583'.
    cobl-gsber = t_gsber.
ENDIF.
IF bseg-hkont EQ '0000098511' OR bseg-hkont EQ '0000098521' OR bseg-hkont EQ '0000098583'.
    bseg-gsber = t_gsber.
ENDIF.

update like below:-
UPDATE dbtab FROM TABLE itab. or
UPDATE (dbtabname) FROM TABLE itab.

MIRO Deselect and select Multiple line items

Hi All,
At the time of miro we are taking the reference of PO. In PO we have 1200 lines related to Custom duty, additional custom duty, ecess, clearing and forwarding charges and freight.
we want to do the MIRO for custom duty, additional duty and freight only, for these we have 600 line items. we need to select these lines one by one. this is time taking job.
can any body tell me that how we can select these line at once.
Regards all

Hi,
You can make use of Planned Delivery cost in the PO Refernce Tab. This will cover all other costs other than you basic material or service cost.
Regards,
amit

MIRO partial invoice for PO line item

Greetings,
We are currently using GR based invoice verification. Recently we received a vendor invoice for partial billing of a fully received line item. The system requires that we enter both a quantity and an amount for the line item being paid. We have up to three decimal places in the quantity field. Our problem is that the amount of the invoice does not correspond to a number that can be entered in the quantity field (it equates to .06147029...). This is causing the system to generate a split accounting entry. Rather than debiting the GRIR account for the full amount of the payment, it is debiting the GRIR account for the amount that corresponds to the quantity entered, and then posting the remainder to the GL associated with the cost object from the PO. Is there a way to prevent the system from making this additional entry? Any input you can provide would be greatly appreciated. I will award points for helpful suggestions. Thanks! Heather

Per SAP, the functionality is working as designed.

Item Text in FBL3N copied automatically from MIRO line item

All,
When a purchase order is created to a cost centre, G/L account and cost centre are entered manually. Often Purchase Order only uses short text field as reference, ie, Material is not mandatory.
MIRO process is then done for PO after GR, and the PO text (short text) is copied into MIRO.
G/L account line items can be displayed in FBL3N, detailing the document numbers related to the invoice/PO once posted.
The field "Text" is defaulted as blank, even if created with reference to a PO which contains text. Does anybody know of a way to automate process so that the text field is populated with the text from MIRO.
Thanks.

Hi Jacob,
You can transfer what ever the data from the MIRO to Accounting document using BTE.
Goto SE37 - SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120 (this is the standard BTE for account document posting). copy this with ZSAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120.
In this you cannot modify the tables t_bkpf and t_bseg. you can use t_bkpfsub and t_bsegsub.
For this a little bit config is required.
1) Goto t-code FIBF-> settings->Products->... of a customer.
Click new entries -> product name- ZPRODUCT , text - any text, RFC dest - ZSAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120, A - enable check box -> save.
2) Go back -> settings -> P/S Modules -> ... of a customer.
Click new entries -> event - 00001120, Product - ZPRODUCT, Ctr - Country key, Appl - FI-FI, Function module - ZSAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120 -> save.
3) Go back -> settings -> Process Modules -> ... of a customer.
Click new entries ->Process - 00001120, Ctr - Country key, Appl - FI-FI, Func module - ZSAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120, Product - ZPRODUCT -> save.
Now goto SE37->ZSAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120
logic.
loop at t_bkpf.
loop at t_bkpfsub.
move 'your value' to t_bkpfsub-value.
modify t_bkpfsub index sy-tabix.
endloop.
endloop.
loop at t_bseg.
loop at t_bsegsub.
move 'your value' to t_bsegsub-value.
modify t_bsegsub index sy-tabix.
endloop.
endloop.
''your value' is imported value.
no need to worry abt modified values. after execution of BTE it will go to standard prog and copy the values of t_bkpfsub] and t_bsegsub[ to SAP tables. so pls be perfect with code. SAP wouldn't allow change the values in t_bkpf] and t_bseg[ values. you can add your own fields in bkpf_subst and bseg_subst.
But make sure that, pls write the code in FM with conditions like cocode doc type etc. bcz this BTE is very important. it will executes before acc doc is posted.if you do not specify any conditions it will execute for all co codes in acc doc. it will affect business. you can debug this BTE. put a break point in FM and see the values while post the MIRO.
once import the values free memory id and clear the variables what ever u used in BTE.
Best Regards,
Mohan.

MIRO tax line item Issue

Dear All,
When I post a MIRO having more than one line item, I am not able to find a material in the Material field in BSEG table for my MIRO Accounting document.
Note that I am using 4.7 version & for tax item entry's since the material is not captured in the std. BSEG table I am unable to get how much is the Sales/Service tax Payed against each item/Material.
Kindly suggest Is this anything to do with my SAP version??
or Is there anyway to make my material appear in the std. BSEG table??
Regards,

Hi,
Do anyone have an idea on this Issue?
Plz help.
Regards,

Miro line item quantity and amount after miro

Dear Forum,
I have got the help about this subject and quite clear. Thanks for all have helped.
Now I need to confirm 1 more part.
Assuming in PO there are 2 scenarios where gr based iv is ticked and also not ticked, after both GR and miro done (complete the process from PO until book vendor invoice in miro), I purposely do another miro invoice type referring to these 2 PO.
I just wonder why the item line still enabled with quantity and amount fields empty? I thought the line item should be totally grey out?
Need advice.
Thanks
Rgds

Dear Srina,
As Std SAP practice system will populate the line item with enable mode even though MIRO fully done for said line item. But any how message will prompt if you enter amount & qty again in empty field & wanted to post the said line item as stated below;
"Check if invoice already entered under accounting doc. no. XXXXXXXXX 2010". Probably you may refer to abapers to have user exit to control this field.
Please view the below link for better understanding.
Exits and Badi in Logistic Invoice Verification
Calculate tax in MIRO
rgds,
nanthakumar

Separate tax line item based on material line item in MIRO

Hi Guru,
PO qty is 100 unit with RM1/each. Condition maintained as sales tax 10%. I did 2 GR separately (MIGO) for said PO with 10qty & 20 qty each. That means sales tax total is (30qty x RM1 x 10% tax) = RM3.
Now I wanted to do IV (MIRO). I noticed 3 line item altogether as show below;
1. 10qty & RM10 (material)
2. 20qty & RM20 (material)
3. 30qty & RM3 (tax)
All line item qty & amount are correct but then the tax line is accumulate altogether. User wanted this separate like how the 1st & 2nd line item is. The reason is the user only wanted to post 1st line item with tax that belongs to 1st line item this month & the 2nd line item may post next month. Please take note that according to our business process, user are NOT allowed to make any changes in qty or amount in MIRO.
May I know how we can separate all condition type amount & qty based on GR qty so that user can select each pair accordingly & able to post it.
Thanking in advance.
rgds,
nema

Dear Experts,
Can anyone assist me?
rgds,
nema

Freight Line Item in MIRO

Dear All,
I have done the GR for 2 times, against the same PO which includes Freight Charges also. When i try to post the invoice thro' MIRO, I am getting 3 line items. 2 for the Materials & only 1 line item for the Freight charges which includes charges for both GRs. But my requirement is i want diff line items for Freight as well. How can i get this ? I have ticked GR based IV in PO.
regds,
CB

hi
i dont think it is possible if you make single invoice
try making two different invoces as per your Gr
try this
when u do MIGo give some delivery note no
now do miro with ref to DELEVERY NOTE NO

Line item in MIRO

Hi Guru,
PO qty is 100 unit with RM1/each. Condition maintained as sales tax 10%. I did 2 GR separately (MIGO) for said PO with 10qty & 20 qty each. That means sales tax total is (30qty x RM1 x 10% tax) = RM3.
Now I wanted to do IV (MIRO). I noticed 3 line item altogether as show below;
1. 10qty & RM10 (material)
2. 20qty & RM20 (material)
3. 30qty & RM3 (tax)
All line item qty & amount are correct but then the tax line is accumulate altogether. User wanted this separate like how the 1st & 2nd line item is. The reason is the user only wanted to post 1st line item with tax that belongs to 1st line item this month & the 2nd line item may post next month. Please take note that according to our business process, user are NOT allowed to make any changes in qty or amount in MIRO.
May I know how we can separate all condition type amount & qty based on GR qty so that user can select each pair accordingly & able to post it.
Thanking in advance.
rgds,
krishna

Hi,
You can use the functionality of the Posting Indicator 2 (Seperate Line Item) in the T Code OBCN for the Processing key which you are using for your Taxes.
Regards,
Amit

Cancellation of 1 line item of miro

Hi I have done 1 miro which is of 6 line item . Out of which I want 5th line item to get miro reversal.
I tried going to miro & pressing copntrol + F10 I have entered the miro no.
But I see all the line items are selected and gray out. I am not able to deselect other line items.
How I can reverse only 1 item in MIRO then.

Hi kiran,
In MIRO screen there is no reversal option for one line item and better to delete that line item by pressing delete(Blue coloured arrows) perticular line item before doing this Select the line item first. Before that you have to think about the GR parked how much pls check the difference will comes so other way to repark In MIR7 and GR enough.
Regards
Sridhar

STATUS_READ & line item rejection reason - too complex

Hi All,
I have to trigger an output to a smartform via an output routine. I have to do the following checks in my output routine before I decide to propose the output or decline to propose the output if conditions fail.
1. Order header can have status PEND, Hold, Release. IF the status has changed to anything else except pending, i should propose output.
2. Again if a line item is rejected with certain reason code, then also I have to propose the output.
Both the above conditions must be checked before proposing the output. My issue is how do I know what was the old value of status and rejection reason.
I tried using FM STATUS_READ, but it does not give something like this was the old value and this is the new value. I do not find any FM to get item rejection reason. Do I have to use change documents for these.
examples
a)Order with 2 Framing Configurable Line Items. The user status of the order is changed from PEND to QAHD. The standard order output label is proposed for both line items on the order. At a later time, one of the line items is rejected for reason 90 (for example). At that time a new label is created, just for that specific line item with the rejected artwork text on the label.
In this case if I use STATUS_READ, i will get active status as QAHD, so I will try to propose normal output so I am fine. Later when the item is rejected, I will again get staus as QAHD and I will propose output for one unrejected item which is WRONG. I had already proposed the output in past, so I should not. I should only propose output for the rejected item.
b)Order with 2 Framing Configurable Line Items. The user status of the order is still in a PEND status. The user changes one of the line items to a rejected for reason 91 (for example). A label is printed just for that line item with the rejected artwork text on the label. At a later time, the user status on the order is changed from PEND to QARD. A label will print, only for the unrejected line item and the label is the standard order output label for HJ.
In this case I do not know where to get the old rejection reason of item. If I do a database select, I will get current rejection reason 91, but how do I know if I had already proposed the output or not for a certain item.
c)Another scenario to think about is that there is nothing preventing the user from setting a rejection status on an item and changing the user status at the same time and saving it. In that case we would want only one label per piece (the rejected label for the rejected item and the standard label for the non-rejected item).
I think I have to check the time order was updated and do something like that.
All inputs are welcomed.
Thanks
Pulin

Write the code like
concatenate 'OR' int_orders-aufnr into d_objnr.
    call function 'STATUS_READ'
         EXPORTING
              client          = sy-mandt
              objnr           = d_objnr
         TABLES
              status          = t_status
         EXCEPTIONS
              object_not_found.
Read table t_status with key stat = 'I0076'.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
do not print output.
endif.
Thanks
Seshu

Withholding tax postings for a single line item during invoice posting

Hello folks,
I have a question from my client about withholding tax postings during invoice postings.
Scenario is
1. There's a PO with multiple line items.
2. A vendor invoice is posted against this PO which has multiple line items. Not all line items are subject to WHT. Is there a way to post WHT specific to a line item while doing MIRO.
3. One line item without WHT and another one with WHT in the same invoice.
Inputs are highly appreciated
Thanks,
Sasidhar

Dear Sasidhar
while posting document remove the withholding tax code manually then system will not post the w/h tax.
in your case select vendor line and remove the tax code then system will not calculate the tax.
another line dynamically calculate the tax.
Regards
Madhu M
Please refer the below wiki pages.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/UgTpCw   (Rupee word Format)
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/8oMEDg    ( J1INEMIS   )
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/2BAMDg   ( J1INACKN )
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/3xAMDg   ( J1INCCREP)

GR amount/line item still showing in Open Item after run F.13

Dear Exparts,
We run the F.13 after MIGO and MIRO. The GR/IR line item should clear after run the F.13. But the scenario is that in FBL3N in GRIR G/L Balance, MIRO Line item showing clear but the GRN line item is still showing in Open item. How can it possible and what to do for it. As per my knowledge Both line item should clear after run f.13.
And how can I get the credit amount in which respect the IR(MIRO) amount cleared.
Thanks,
Sourav

Hello Sourav,
In the Automatic clearing Program for the items to get cleared they
should meet the fixed criterian and the user defined criteria (OB74).
When we execute SAP124(F.13) with the flag "only documents which can
be cleared" it will display in detailed list only those documents that
can be cleared. If dont check this field it will generate a list even
of documents that cannot be cleared.
For example:
in the OB74: ASSIGNMENT,FUND & BUSINESS AREA as the criteria.
And the ASSIGNMENT is not matching and thus the system does not find
the item suitable or rather eligible for clearing.
The system groups items according to
fixed system criteria:
Company code
Account type
Account number
Reconciliation account number
Currency key
BSID-WAERS for customers
BSIK-WAERS for vendors
BSIS-PSWSL for G/L accounts
Special G/L indicator
The program also groups items according to a maximum of five user
criteria. Note that the trading partner number and the business area are
no longer fixed system criteria (in comparison to the former clearing
programs SAPF123 and SAPF123W). Therefore, if you want to group by
business area or trading partner number, you have to enter these as user
criteria.
Thus initially items are grouped according to fixed criteria one of
which is company code.
I would like you to review note 10757 FAQ: MR11, clear GR/IR clearing
account
Please also review the documentation of the program SAPF124
Please also review the help.sap.com documentation on GR/IR Account
Maintenance.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/30/1060387db94003e1000000
9b38f8cf/frameset.htm
hope this helps
regards
Ray
Edited by: Raymond Moynihan on Oct 19, 2011 5:14 PM

Double line Item For Tax

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have a issue related to invoice verification.
We have following tax procedure
Basic Price + Excise + Frieght + VAT = Gross Price
But here frieght is taxable on which VAT is caluculated.
But while doing MIRO system is showing two line items for Tax condition (VAT)
1. One line item VAT amt calculated on (Basic price + Excise duty)
2. Second line item VAT amt calculated on (Frieght amt.)
I have maintained single line item in OBCN.
My client want to have single line item.
Pls tell me how to solve this.
Regards
Gitesh

Hi
DCGR means freight GR. System automatically creates this at the time of MIGO, if freight condition is mentioned in PO itself.
Hence in MIGO creation systems creates one material GR and with the same number one DCGR.
You can see it from purchase order history through PO.

MIRO No Proposal of PO line item

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for