MIRO posted with cancelled GR

Hello,
The scenario is we have created GRN (From 101 Movement) and cancelled same due to some reason. Parked invoice should not be created in reference of cancelled document.
We can see same in EKBE as per attached snapshot
Same time we don’t have tick mark on RevGR Desp.IR in SPRO & check on GR based Invoice Verification in PO. So curious to know how it happened and please let us know how to restrict the posting of park invoice (Should not be posted if reference GR has been canceled) or restrict the cancellation of GR if parked invoice is created for this GR.
Regards,
Vivek Kumar

Hi,
Go to OMRM transaction and maintain the message M8 088 as error message as shown below:
Now, system wont allow to post the IR if GR is reversed. You may test the scenario and revert back.
Regards,
AKPT

Similar Messages

MIRO - Posting with trans.type 159 not possible (No acquisition posted)

Hi all,
I have a case where an asset PO was created with multiple account assignment in one line item. For example, purchase 10 pc of printer with 10 asset numbers specified in the account assignment tab. By standard SAP, the GR is non-valuated.
The GR of the PO was done in the previous period. Now, when the invoice is to be posted thru MIRO. The system generate error message to me. The error message is "Posting with trans.type 159 not possible (No acquisition posted)" and message number is AA324.
The reason of this error is due to no acquisition date in the asset master. GR is non-valuated hence, the acquisition date is not populated in the asset as well. I believe this is quite a common problem. Kindly advise any workaround solution.
Thanks.
Tom

Hi
refer notes 1526247 and 1507808... Though it relates to Japan, but the issue is same
Br, Ajay M

MIRO post with different KDM account based on AP recon. account

Hi Gurus,
    I have one question on MIRO exchange rate difference posting.
    As user request, different AP Recon. account need post with different exchange rate difference account.
    In more detail: AP Recon. account has two kinds: Trading partner, none TP.
    For TP, post ex. rate different to one Inter company exchage rate diff. account,
    for none TP, post to the other exchange rate diff. account.
    But as I found, the exchange rate diff. accout is defined in OBYC, transaction KDM. It cannot config seperate by TP.
   Any one has encounter similar request?
Thanks,
Grace

Unfortunately the MIRO exchange diff setup is not defined in FBKA exchange rate difference.
It is defined in Materials Management postings (MM).
So any more idea?
Thanks,
Grace

MIRO posting with reference to Purchase Order

Dear Experts,
I've created a Purchase Order with reference to a purchase requisition. Now I want to post MIRO with reference to this Purchase Order Number to give payment to Vendor mentioned in Purchase order. But when I going to post miro amount not coming which I mentioned in Purchase Order!!
How can I post MIRO with reference to Purchase Order Number? Is it possible?
Best Regards.
Ripon

As above it sounds like a GR gasn't been posted but you can still process invoice. Just manually enter the quantity and value as per invoice.
Note the invoice will block for payment pending the GR.
See transaction MRBR if you want to release the invoice for payment immediately.
Regards,
Nick

MIRO error Posting with trans.type 159 not possible (No acquisition posted)

Hi,
I have the following probem while doing MIRO. Would appreciate if someone could help.
Error in Purchase invoice posting MIRO :-
The user has created a PO for asset in FY2010 and has performed a MIGO in FY2010.
Now in FY2011 the user tries to invoice against the above asset and wants to post it thru Trans MIRO.
System gives an error during MIRO "Posting with trans.type 159 not possible (No acquisition posted)" Message no AA 324
Trans type 159 has trans type group 12 attached to it.
MIGO can not be reversed because it belongs to the closed FY.
Please help

Hi
refer notes 1526247 and 1507808... Though it relates to Japan, but the issue is same
Br, Ajay M

Posting the MIRO Document with reference of PO

Hello friends
while user posting the MIRO Document with reference of PO , he is getting difference in balance
Total amount is 31,237.00
Posting amount is 28,320.05
Balance amount is 2,916.95 this balance amount not getting post in MIRO
Before that i have seen GR amount is 28,320.05 but In IR amount same 28,320.05 but withholding tax tab not appering withholding tax amount
Can any body please help me on the same
Regards
sudharshana vamsi
Edited by: asuvamsi on Feb 24, 2010 1:43 PM

Hello friends
Thanks For all my problem was resloved
Solution is
An message has been occuring like withhold tax has been refreshed. it is just an information message not an error message. this message will trigger when the trans. type is non project type activity. No back end process has been disturbed due to this message. it just passing the information to the user.
we changed the trans. type to manufacturing activity and it is working fine.
I hope it ll help in future
Thanks and Regards
vamsi

Error posting with trans.type 159 not possible (no aquisition posted)

Hello All,
A user has created an PO for asset with GR non valuated in 2007 and has performed a MIGO/GR in the same year 2007. Now in 2008 the user has received an invoice against the said asset and wants to post it thru Trans MIRO.
At the time of posting the invoice the user gets the error "posting with trans.type 159 not possible (no aquisition posted)" . Since this is a completely new asset and GR non valuated asset process is a standard in SAP why is the system recognising the transation type as 159 i/o trans type 100 ie new asset aquisition.
If i post a dummy value to the same asset using FB01 the system accepts the value but the same process if i intend to follow usin MIRO system does not allow.
Can you guys help me
Thanks
Nelson

Thanks Paul for your reply, I checked the depreciation key. inthe key the "Aqu only allowed in capitalization year is marked as NO"
Therefore the problem is not the depreciation key
Thanks
Nelson

Posting with transaction type 160 is not possible at MR8M

MODERATOR: Do not post (or request) email address or links to copyrighted or confidential information on these forums. If you do, the thread will be LOCKED and all points UNASSIGNED. If you have some information, please consider posting it to the [Wiki|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/Home] rather than sharing via email. Thank you for your assistance.
Hi All,
We raised a PO w.r.t CWIP asset and posted GRN (MIGO - Transaction typr:100) and Invoice (MIRO).
Here, Invoice posted wrongly, So we are trying to reverse the invoice with MR8M (which is posted thru MIRO).
But system populating one message as per the following:
Posting with transaction type 160 is not possible here, see long text
Message no. AAPO 177
Diagnosis:
Transaction type 160 has a depreciation limitation, although posting is not mandatory in all of the depreciation areas entered However, it is not possible to select depreciation areas in the current transactions.
Procedure:
Check the specification of transaction type 160 or use transaction MR8M to enter the transaction
Please help
Sairavi
kumarfi9gmailcom

Welcome to the forum.
As a newbie you should understand the forum rules where you are not suppose to post any basic or repeated question. To avoid this, you should make a search here
[Forum Search|http://forums.sdn.sap.com/search!default.jspa?objID=f327]
Type the same error text in Search Terms so that you will find the solution.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Exchange Rate difference posting during MIRO posting

Hi ,
We are facing an issue for exchange rate difference posting during MIRO.
PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date. Vendor in PO has different currency than company code currency. Exchange rate maintained in OB08 for this period is taken in PO.
PO value & GR value is same. Due to raw material cost there was price difference posted during GR posting.
(i.e. Raw material cost - GR/IR value = Price difference amount)
During posting MIGO, 3 accounts got posted.
Raw material cost account got debited & offset credit to GR/IR account & price difference account (in vendor & company code currency also)
During posting MIRO, 4 accounts got posted.
Vendor account got credited with GR/IR amount & offset to GR/IR account debit.
Exchange rate difference account got credited & offset to price difference account (in company code currency only)
Since PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date, then why system has posted exchange rate difference account in local currency only during MIRO posting ?
Your inputs appreciated.
Thanks & Regards

Hi,
there is a setting in configuration of logistics invoice verification where you can control the calculation and posting of exchange rate differences. If you had the setting active that exchange rate differences are calculated against a planned exchange rate, that might lead to the kind of postings you describe. Please check.
best regards, Udo

Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

Hi to all,
We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
Thanks & Regards,
Y.Kiran Babu

Hi,
For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672. This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines. Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records. However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
3) Run reconstruction for AVC
You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
    o Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
    o Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
       Control System (BCS)
Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

MIRO Posting against wrong payment,as against default vendor payment terms

MIRO Posting against wrong payment,as against default vendor payment terms

Hi,
Go to MR8M, cancel that posting Document.
Go to payment tab while MIRO, Give the payment terms or delete the payment terms.
Now if u post as Invoice Gross - Document Type....system will ignore the discount and it will be come to effect at the time of payment.
if u take as Invoice -NET, System Will consider those discount at time of MIRO.
Hope Help U !
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

If GR based IV checked for items without excise duty, MIRO posting hanging.

Iam working in a client location, one of client business scenario is MIRO posting without excise (Only VAT or CST). for this case i have not maintained vendor excise details in J1ID.
When a MIRO with reference to PO for an item ticked for "GR based IV" is posted, the system is hanging or is not posting and not issuing any message. Specifically for an item to which exicse is not applicable.
please send your expert advice on this
Edited by: J Sridharan on Mar 30, 2009 3:55 PM

Thanks for your response
this issue is further briefed below
we are working for a indian client with CIN. most of the PO's which is created in SAP system with all Excise parameters and applicable taxes. further all PO's created with GR based IV check box enabled.
now the issue is, in some of the purchases vendor is not applicable for excise, so there is no excise parameters in the PO, only tax is applicable. for this case we have not maintained vendor excise details in J1ID. but we have maintained material chapter id and CENVAT determination in J1ID. but as i mentioed earlier these PO's also with GR based IV check box enabled.
If the PO is not excisable no Excise capturing and posting is required, for these types of PO's we are following the below steps
1. Creation of PO with GR based IV check box enabled
2. Goods Receipt without excise capturing
3. Invoice verification - MIRO ( here system is not able to post the docuement because of GR based IV tick mark)
i hope this will brief about my query.
waiting for your response.

Excise duty 4% diff. while MIRO posting after FV12 condition record change

Hi Gurus,
Iam coming straight to the CRUX of the matter.
Iam working for a client and facing a support problem.
I got an issue that recently Government has reduced excise rate from 14% to 10%
But PO already created with 14%.Later the condition record changed to 10% in FV12.
then only MIGO posted.
while doing MIRO iam getting 4% difference value
why is it so?
Please help me in this regard.
I also attached the screen shot in the link given below
[http://rapidshare.com/files/184718013/MIRO__ED__14_.rtf.html]
Regards,
Anbu

HI
Check your PO creation date and condition record validity date (FV12) an MIRO posting date.
Thank You

MIRO post - Invoice Reduction Scenario - Duplicate SPLIT_KEY in RBWS

Hi Experts,
I came across a challenging issue... seeking help from you...
MIRO posting Vendor is Subjected to withholding tax & INVOICE REDUCTION scenario..... As per SAP Invoice Reduction scenarion, MIRO creates Invoice and subsequent debit memo for reduction amount.
When User try to post the LIV document, transaction returns the " Express Termination error " due to Duplicate entries are accumulated for Table RBWS with same SPLIT_KEY (Grouping key for Splitting Vendor line item ) for 2 sets of withholding Tax entries. ST22 system dump happens in FM- MRM_WITHHOLDING_TAXES_SAVE. Couldn't able to find the reason for Duplicate SPLIT_KEY
I Would like to understand significance of SPLIT_KEY in RBWS ? and
Under what circumstance MIRO posting will have different SPLIT_KEY
in RBWS for same MM document ??
Any insight would be great help.
Regards,
Sri

I agree, you can use the Credit Memo functionality in SAP, but I don't think you can print out a form once the credit memo form to send to the Vendor that states you are taking the debit. It would also be useful if this process was automated. The invoice is blocked, you determine that the Vendor is at fault, the Credit Memo is automatically posted and a Debit Memo is printed out. Anyone aware of any bolt on software that might help?

MIRO Posti - Invoice Reduction Scenario - Duplicate SPLIT_KEY in Table RBWS

Hi Experts,
I came across a challenging issue... seeking help from you...
MIRO posting Vendor is Subjected to withholding tax & INVOICE REDUCTION scenario..... As per SAP Invoice Reduction scenarion, MIRO creates Invoice and subsequent debit memo for reduction amount.
When User try to post the LIV document, transaction returns the " Express Termination error " due to Duplicate entries are accumulated for Table RBWS with same SPLIT_KEY (Grouping key for Splitting Vendor line item ) for 2 sets of withholding Tax entries. system dump happens in FM- MRM_WITHHOLDING_TAXES_SAVE. Couldn't able to find the reason for Duplicate SPLIT_KEY
I Would like to understand significance of SPLIT_KEY in RBWS ? and
Under what circumstance MIRO posting will have different SPLIT_KEY
in RBWS for same MM document ??
Any insight would be great help.
Regards,
Sri

Hi,
1.- read this OSS Note:
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1156325
here it says:
An active implementation of this BAdI excludes the manual entry of the withholding tax base and amount.
You define the settings for the calculation in Financial Accounting Customizing under the following activity:
Define Withholding Tax Type for Invoice Posting
Have you done that?
2.- read this OSS Note too:
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1286713
according to this note:
When you create an implementation for the BAdI MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE,
fill the internal tables TE_RBVS[] and TE_RBWS[] as follows:
TE_RBVS[] = I_RBKPV-H_RBVS[].
TE_RBWS[] = I_RBKPV-H_RBWS[].
it seems you should do the same.
e.g.
TE_RBWS[] = LT_RBWS[].
3.- you´re filling internal table lt_lfbw but you´re not doing anything with it, why?
Best regards.
Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Jan 9, 2010 12:53 PM

MIRO posted with cancelled GR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for