MIRO Tax Codes being changed from PO Tax codes

Hi,
When I raise a PO with GL acc assignment to 466001 if I use a tax code other than V0 i get the error message "G/L account 466001 permits only tax code V0; this is correct as the only tax code allowed should be V0 for this GL account and this is in the GL master data.
But when I posted two invoices against it using MIRO, one coded V1 and one P1, both of were posted, without the error message "G/L account 466001 permits only tax code V0; P1 is not permitted" showing.
Please can someone tell me why this would be allowed and how I can change it so only the PO tax codes are pulled through and they cannot be changed in MIRO?
Thanks-
Shem

Hello shemhin,
In miro what is account entry passed. According me the different amount (because of change in tax code) hit to price difference account or stock account or any tolerance group account,if maintained.
In case of revert me back.
Regards,
sankar

Similar Messages

What are the issues of the Tax Code length change from 2 to 4 characters?

Dear All,
I understand sales tax codes (T007A-MWSKZ) will be changing from 2 characters to 4 characters in 2010. Can anyone explain the implications this is expected to have?
Will the impact to the system be large or small?
What factors will we need to consider in preparation for this change?
Kind regards,
Mark
Edited by: Mark Walker on Jul 20, 2009 9:23 PM
Edited by: Mark Walker on Jul 20, 2009 9:32 PM
Edited by: Mark Walker on Jul 20, 2009 9:33 PM

Hello Mark,
Please follow OSS notes which you mensioned in your message. SAP developer and support team explained how to customize and use new codes surely on your system.
Regards,
Burak

New bar code technology changing height of bar code

Dear Guru's,
I have a barcode in smartforms with the new bar code technology. It has automaticly the height of 20 mm.
Allas I need accordig to certain standards a barcode withe the height of 32 mm. I do not have any clue how to change the height of the bar code. I hope some of you do.
Thanls in advance,
JP

hi blom,
to have different size for barcode,
in smart styles, in character formats, if u create a node "c1" a character format, there in standard settings tab u can have bar code details. at barcode name u can have a drop down list from which u can select one.
if u select one for example: BC_EAN8
below it shows its height & width.
so check the barcode which have ur required size. apply that one.
hope this can help you.

Call script from script; exit code issues

I have verified in a very simple pair of scripts that I can feed an exit code back to the calling script. My "Parent" test is little more than
powershell.exe -file "$ScriptPath\child.ps1"
Write-Host "$LASTEXITCODE!!!"
and the child script is just
Exit 1
And that Write-host comes back correctly. I have even tried it with two different child scripts, with different rerun codes, being called from Parent back to back. All good.
However, in a more complicated script, where the child script has conditional exits, I am getting 0 all the time. The conditional looks like this
if ($Global:MemberofSet) {
if ($Global:ErrorOccured) {
Write-Host '1'
Exit 1
else {
Write-Host '0'
Exit 0
And even when the 1 echoes, I still get a $LASTEXITCODE of 0.
Is there some known issue here that I am not aware of? Using PS 2.0, FWIW.
Thanks!

Um, no, more that I remmed out
[CmdletBinding()] at the top of each child script and with no other changes everything is working exactly as it should. Not sure why it worked, but I am certainly not imagining it.
For shits and giggles I also added the binding in my little test script set, and that is now broken,
with no other changes. I really hadn't created a good test obviously, but I wasn't expecting binding to matter. Would love to hear an explanation as to why it would
For anyone wanting to see the behavior, these are the three test scripts, and you run the Arch script. With binding enabled DTV will show 1, but return 0. Rem the
bindings and DTV will correctly return 1. I also tested RVT to not be MemberofSet, so -1 is returned, and $LASTEXITCODE shows a wonky number as expected given the bug in 2.0 and negative return codes.
NOTE: In the test the argument in the child scripts is not used, it's just there to avoid the error you otherwise get when binding. In my "live" code the
arguments are mandatory and used.
Arch_2015.ps1
powershell.exe -file "RVT_2015.ps1"
Write-Host "$LASTEXITCODE!"
powershell.exe -file "DTV_2015.ps1"
Write-Host "$LASTEXITCODE!"
DTV_2015.ps1
[CmdletBinding()]
Param ([string]$Mode)
$Global:MemberofSet = $True
$Global:ErrorOccured = $True
if ($Global:MemberofSet) {
if ($Global:ErrorOccured) {
Write-Host 'DTV 1'
Exit 1
else {
Write-Host 'DTV 0'
Exit 0
else {
Write-Host 'RVT -1'
Exit -1
RVT_2015.ps1
[CmdletBinding()]
Param ([string]$Mode)
$Global:MemberofSet = $True
$Global:ErrorOccured = $False
if ($Global:MemberofSet) {
if ($Global:ErrorOccured) {
Write-Host 'RVT 1'
Exit 1
else {
Write-Host 'RVT 0'
Exit 0
else {
Write-Host 'RVT -1'
Exit -1

Company code currency change over

Dear all,
Want to know information about company code currency changes.
Our company code currency is SGD and now want to change to USD.
Our fiscal year is Jan-Dec and we are in SAP 5.0 version.
Can you let us know whether itu2019s possible to do the change?
If so, how and can we perform this activity in the middle of the year.
How to take care of the open items like PO,SO,Vendor ,Customer, which we have already posted in the system with our SGD currency.
And if not, do suggest and alternate/workaround.
Heard about, that this can be achieved with PARALLEL CURRENCY activation.
Not having much idea about Parallel Currency.
Do suggest.
Regards,

Hi,
A change of the company code currency is possible. The change is only possible as at year end (the actual running of the programms can be done mid-year provided certain customising has been done prior to the first posting in that year).
All items will get changed from old local currency to new local currency.
You can read the documentation in Spro > Cross-Application Components > EMU > Local Currency Changeover.
This is a very complex procedure so be sure to read all the documentatin first.
Kind regards

Reg changes done to UD code

Hi,
In a plant for which all insp lots changes done in UD code is to be tracked and the value from whcih UD code to change done in UD code, which tables are to be seen.
Regards
venkat

Hi Vanket
Firslty, you need to set the field 'Documentation required' in the QM view of the material master, then the change history will be recorded. In QA12/QA13 you can then click the button 'Change history' to check who and when changed UD code.
Regarding the tables, they are CDHDR (Change header), CDPOS (Change detail), you can get the history thourgh the fields below.
objectclas = QPRUEFLOS
objectid = the lot number like 040000000239.
The user and time of change is in the CDHDR, the content of change is in CDPOS.
Hope this could be helpful.
Best Regrds.
Leon.

Tax Code gets changed while copying from A/r Invoice to Credit memo

Hello,
When i am copying my A/R Invoice to A/R credit memo, at that time the tax code i have specified in the invoice gets changed to some other code in credit memo.
Please suggest me what to do.
Regards.
ShriX.

Hi!
Really looking strange, unable to predict. Also, check wheather yo have defined anything in
TaxCode Determination in Adminstration > Setup > Finance > TaxCode Determination.
If so, delete those and check.
Raise a support message to SAP.

Another tax determination code being picked up along with right tax determination code during creation of BBP

Hi Experts,
There is an issue I am facing while creating BBP, the slices in table DFKKMOP are having another tax determination code being picked up along with the right tax detemination code.
E.g. -> In EK02 for the BBP I have configured tax determination code ZA for main 0051 and sub 0050 for all the company codes, but it is also picking ZX which I have configured for main 100 - sub 202,203 , main - 200 sub 202,203 , main 300- sub 202,203.
Strangely In the table DFKKMOP the tax determination code ZX is coming in the line which has main 0051 and sub 0050.
I dont understand why ZX is being shown in the field BB grouping - Budget Billing: Grouping Key for Tax Determination Code.
I have double checked the customizing in EK02 and I dont find this tax determination code being defined for main 0051/sub 0050, then why is it being picked up for BBP line item in table DFKKMOP.
Any suggestions are appreciated.

Well the issue was during creation of BBP items in DFKKMOP the VAT corresponding to Main/Sub 100/ 3xx was being picked up and when I adapted the tax determination code there. The items was created without any split.
For the second one PA issue, well in this case the tax determination in the standard during the creation of PA invoice via EA27 is happening on the date of execution and not on the selection date or posting date. This is because in SPRO the config. of invoicing <<Define Basic Settings for Invoicing>>
has <<Date type for tax determination in Invoicing for Part. Bills.>> set to <<tax determination in invoicing based on entry date>> that is why it takes the execution date into consideration.So even when we do a posting for SOLLDAT in future to take another tax code it doesnt take that SOLLDAT instead takes todays execution date for which the new tax code is not valid.
To overcome this issue either we need to make the new tax code valid from date in past ie. before the date of execution or we need to change this parameter in customizing <<Define Basic Settings for Invoicing>> to <<tax determination in invoicing based on Posting date>>.
Voilà!

Tax Code not copied from Billing to Accounting

Hi,
I have a case wherein the tax code is not being copied over from an intercompany Invoice to Accounting line items.
The conditon record at Billing Header (MWST) has a tax code of B4. The Tax code at the Accouting Line Items is coming out as Blank. The VAT number however is correctly defined.
What we did notice is that this would occur when the MWST is determined as 0%. For non-zero data, the tax code gets copied over.
Does anyone have any idea why its happening this way.
Thanks n Regards
Dharmendra Rara

Hi Dharmendra,
Please note that the SD-FI interface changed
from earlier releases. The note 400766 eplxains the checks made.
So it is possible that now you get error message FF805, when in an
earlier release you didn't get it, eventhough no customizing change.
However please note =>
In the vast majority of cases, error FF805 occurs because of an error
in your pricing procedure. The previously attached note 112609 explains
in detail how tax codes are transfered to conditions.
The note 400766 explains the checks performed by the system on the Tax
codes:
1. system checks whether there is a revenue line for each tax line.
2. in the reverse case, for each revenue line containing a certain
tax indicator there must be a tax line with this indicator.
If the tax condition has condition value zero and condition base
value zero, then it is not transferred to FI.
If you have revenue lines containing a tax indicator XX, but no
tax line with tax indicator XX, then the error FF805 issues, and
it is justified. => Please check these informations.
I hope this is helpful.
Regards,
Alex

RFWT0020 withholding tax data - Data Regen vs. Change to Source Tax Code?

Can anyone explain the difference between these two options when running RFWT0020 to update withholding tax data? Data Regeneration vs. Changes to Source Tax Code? I can't find any mention of the two options in the program documentation
When I do test runs with the two different options, the program is selecting difference documents to update. If we are just turning on the 1099 functionality now (beginning with the 2011 tax year), should I run the program once with Regeneration mode and once with Changes to Source Tax Code???
Thanks for any advice!
Allison

Hi,
he program enables the withholding tax code to be changed for reconciled and open items with existing withholding tax data. For this, the tax rate of the existing withholding tax data as well as the tax rate of the new withholding tax code must be 0%. The new withholding tax codes are taken from the customer or vendor master data. In the case of extended withholding tax, the withholding tax code is only changed if the related withholding tax categories are the same. The withholding tax base amount is not changed by this procedure.
Recreating or changing the withholding tax data requires that the program first be executed for invoices and then executed for payments in a subsequent step.
When you start the program, the selection screen appears. You can make selections according to vendors, tax code 1, tax code 2 (vendor master record), customers, tax code 1, tax code 2 (customer master record), company codes, document numbers and posting data. The selection determines which items are checked for possible subsequent entries in tables BSEG, BSAK, BSIK, BSAD, BSID, WITH_ITEM.
You can also decide whether only withholding tax data is to be handled for cases where the documents in question contain no withholding tax data. There is no withholding tax data if no withholding tax entries exist for the item selected in table WITH_ITEM (extended withholding tax) or the die withholding tax fields in table BSEG are not filled.
The selection can also be made in test mode. If you do this, no changes are made in the database. You are therefore advised to run the program in test mode initially.
Regards
Aditya

Changing from classic withholding tax to extendend withholding tax

Hi all
the client is using clasic withholding tax. now they want extendend withholding tax
can you give clarification on this . what are the changes i need to modify?
this is very urgent
Thanks
Krishna

hello
I think you need to maintain all configuration steps for the extended WT.
Change company code assignments.
Check if new number ranges need to be defined.
Check the tax codes.
But you might have issues with some MIRO transactions when switching over. Check this scenario.
Other wise, I do not see an issue in changing.
Reg

Calculation of Tax Issue from FB60 (Tax Code Issue)

Dear All,
Normally when we purchase or received any services we post following entry.
INVOICE VALUE IS 1000
Purchase Ac Dr   1000
   To Vendor                   900
   T o Tax                         100
But our requirement is that
Purchase Ac Dr   1100
   To Vendor                  1000
   T o Tax                          100
System should add cost of TAX in purchase instead of reduction form vendor balance as we have to give 1000 RS to vendor.
Can we create TAX code in this manner.
This is not even possible form function available in Edit Option in FB60 (Calculate tax on Net Amount)
Not even from TDS (Withholding tax)
WE CANu2019T SUGGEST POSTING JV IN THAT CASE.
Regards,
Bittu

Apologized for that Atif.
Withholding Tax Type does not control Vendor line item.
My issue is that system should not reduce value enter in vendor amount field.
System usually reduce amount which is payable to vendor
Please see my example once again. I also mention that it is not working from Withholding Tax nor form Tax code(FTXP)
Edit option in FB60 is also not useful in this case.
Regards,

Change from tax calc procedure TAXUS to TAXUSJ - Any experiences?

It looks like we are going to have to change a basic function (as a result of a change in law). That is we are currently configured to use the calculation procedure TAXUS (for non-jurisdictional tax calculations) to TAXUSJ (jurisdictional). (We are using the US country code and will only be selling within state, but now have to base sales tax on ship-to location rather than point of sale).
I've been looking over the docs on what needs to be changed in config/customizing, and found a little note that says "Once you choose your method, with or without jurisdiction codes, itis difficult to switch to another." Yikes!
So I'm looking for anyone who has "been ther done that" or who may have information I can use as I begin laying out a plan to do just that.
Any advice or suggestions are very welcome.
Thanks
Laurie

Hi,
Please check the following:
1. SPRO--->Financial Accounting --> Financial Accounting Global Settings --> Tax on Sales / Purchases -->
Basic Settings -- > Assign Country to Calculation Procedure
2. SPRO--> Financial Accounting --> Financial Accounting Global Settings --> Tax on Sales / Purchases --> Calculation --> Define Tax Codes for Sales and Purchases
3. SPRO-->Financial Accounting --> Financial Accounting Global Settings --> Tax on Sales / Purchases --> Calculation --> Assign Company Code to Document date for Tax determination
4. SPRO--> Financial Accounting --> Financial Accounting Global Settings --> Tax on Sales / Purchases --> Posting --> Define Tax accounts
I doubt more on Tcode:FV11.
hope its useful.
Reward points if useful. Revert back with the error message and number if any other issue.
thanks..

Default tax code in PO from Condition record :::::::

Hello experts
If a condition record for a plant vendor material combination is maintained for a particular tax code , is it possible to default the tax code maintained in PO from the condition record??
Pls give ur valuable inputs
Regards
Anis

from Note 214151 - Tax processing in purchasing
. Determination of the tax code
The tax code is defaulted from the purchasing info record in the purchase order item, however, it can also be determined via the conditions. During the determination via the condition technique an access sequence is assigned in the standard system of condition NAVS. With the latter, different tax codes can be stored via the normal condition maintenance depending on tax indicators (material, plant, account assignment, origin). Basically this access sequence can also be assigned to other condition types. The tax code is only transferred to the purchase order if class "D" (taxes) is the condition type. If several condition types of this type exist in the purchase order item, the first one that contains a tax code is transferred.

Tax code cant excluded from the cost

Hi,
How can i do when I have two tax and one of them cant be excluded from the cost ? Let me show what i want.
I have one product that have two tax, like this: Product 001 - tax one IPI and Tax two ICMS. But the tax one cant be exclude from the cost. It will be that way:
In AP Invoice.
- Produto 001: 1000 (Total of product)
- IPI 5% : 50
- ICMS 18: 180
The cost should be 870 because the IPI can be excluded.
Ps. ICMS is in and IPI is out.
Thanks for your help.
Wagner

Jimmy,
I´m from brazil and i think that the tax is complicated. Im going to try explaim for you.
First of all, Tax in and tax out for me is not used in AP or AR. I´m using this concept only for AP. It means here that: - When i say IN I want to say that this tax is in the price, it makes part of the price. When i say OUT I want to say that this tax in out of the price, it doesnt make part of the price. So, let me show yout how is appears in one invoice.
Invoice.
Numeber 2
Product 001
unit price 100
quantity 10
total value 1000
ICMS is IN 18% - 180
IPI is OUT 5% - 50
Until here is ok, what i want is that just only the IPI be cost and dont be subtract from that value (cost).
Thanks.
Wagner

MIRO Tax Codes being changed from PO Tax codes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for