Mis match in BW report

Hi Experts,
I have a report Summary of Sales on 0SD_C03, in this report NET VALUE column is there, this column value is summation of BASICVALUE, BED, CESS, SEC-CESS. in R/3 these 4 values are there,but coming to BW it is showing '0' value for SEC-CESS, because of that NET VALUE showing wrong.
how to get that value, this data last month data.
how can i solve my problem,
good answer will be appreciated with points,
thanks in advance
Venkat

Hi Venkat,
As its the data problem, Please proceed as below.
1. Please check out for some routine (start, end or transformation routine). May be due to the logic your lossing your data.
2. Check the value for the same column in Your PSA as well.
2. If values is not in PSA as well then go to RSA3 and check out for the same column.
3. If you dont get data in RSA3 then check out for any enhancement logic you have written.
Please confirm the availibilty of data at any of the above stage and then proceed accordingly
Thanks
Dipika
Edited by: Dipika Tyagi on Jul 7, 2008 6:50 AM

Similar Messages

Accounts Payable Reconciliation Account does not match with sap report

Hello Folks,
I have problem with AP reconciliation account, that the balances in FS10N for a particular Company Code for particular reconciliation account balance do not match with the report run to show the vendor balances in local currency (report tcode F.98). Balance does not match for last posting period of the FY.
I have tried looking all the vendors in that particular GL recon account and ran the report, but still it i wast able to find out anything. May be Special GL transaction posting be there, but how to check that is there any spl gl transaction it there in the recon account.
I this to be solved by tonight, all the inputs will be very much appreciated and point will be assigned for sure.
Thanks you all.

Hi,
In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
The reconsilation account form the Vendor
The G/L account where to posting is created on.
It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
Paul

Mis match in attributes of item category B and Blanket PO item details

Hi
I could not able to create a Blanket PO with document type FO and item category B (limit).
Normally for a blanket PO, GR is not allowed and IR is mandatory. So, I could able to see these checkboxes for GR (not set and grayed) and IR (set and grayed) in the item details of the PO in delivery and invoice tabs. But I end with an error message that 'GR is not set is used is not allowed' (exactly i don't remember but some thing like that)
Before creating a blanket PO, I found that in 'attributes of item categories', that for the item category B, GR is set and IR is not set (in customizing-OMH4). Of course, one cannot change the attributes of item categories.
I suppose due to this mis-match in the attributes of item categories and that in the PO, I'm getting an error message while creating a blanket PO and could not able to save.
Also I have checked all the system messages for the message displayed. No where(i.e. in any message class or category and for that message number) I found any such message defined with error in 'attributes of system messages' for purchasing, material master, inventory, invoice verification etc.
I suppose this error message is coming somewhere from the application program for the PO.
So, what can be the solution
waiting for your reply.
thank you

Thank you for your answer. I haven't mention this point in my thread but I have already tried this.
I have tried matching the GR and IR controls of account assignment category with PO GR, IR controls and also with item category B, GR, IR controls. Still i am getting the same error and could not able to save the PO
Also I have checked the field settings for PO for all categories like transaction relevant, item category relevant, etc in customizing.
Main problem is both GR and IR controls are being grayed in PO. Other wise I could able to change them as per my wish and could able to avoid the error even though the GR and IR controls in PO are correct as per the process requirement.
If possible, please check the GR and IR controls for item category B (in my system it showing that GR is set with binding and IR is not set with binding). But it should be reverse as per the process requirements and in limit PO it is showing correctly. i.e. with GR is not set with binding and IR is set with binding.
thank you

Mis match in attributes of item category B-limit and PO item details

Hi
I could not able to create a Blanket PO with document type FO and item category B (limit).
Normally for a blanket PO, GR is not allowed and IR is mandatory. So, I could able to see these checkboxes for GR (not set and grayed) and IR (set and grayed) in the item details of the PO in delivery and invoice tabs. But I end with an error message that 'GR is not set is used is not allowed' (exactly i don't remember but some thing like that)
Before creating a blanket PO, I found that in 'attributes of item categories', that for the item category B, GR is set and IR is not set (in customizing-OMH4). Of course, one cannot change the attributes of item categories.
I suppose due to this mis-match in the attributes of item categories and that in the PO, I'm getting an error message while creating a blanket PO and could not able to save.
Also I have checked all the system messages for the message displayed. No where(i.e. in any message class or category and for that message number) I found any such message defined with error in 'attributes of system messages' for purchasing, material master, inventory, invoice verification etc.
I suppose this error message is coming somewhere from the application program for the PO.
So, what can be the solution
waiting for your reply.
thank you
Message was edited by:
srinivas vandana

Thank you for your answer. I haven't mention this point in my thread but I have already tried this.
I have tried matching the GR and IR controls of account assignment category with PO GR, IR controls and also with item category B, GR, IR controls. Still i am getting the same error and could not able to save the PO
Also I have checked the field settings for PO for all categories like transaction relevant, item category relevant, etc in customizing.
Main problem is both GR and IR controls are being grayed in PO. Other wise I could able to change them as per my wish and could able to avoid the error even though the GR and IR controls in PO are correct as per the process requirement.
If possible, please check the GR and IR controls for item category B (in my system it showing that GR is set with binding and IR is not set with binding). But it should be reverse as per the process requirements and in limit PO it is showing correctly. i.e. with GR is not set with binding and IR is set with binding.
thank you

Sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report

Dear Gurus,
Looking Ur assistance for an issue.
Issue: For some of the sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report. Actual No of Pipes matches with LIKP table values in R3. Query needs to be modified to restrict records as per logic in WGSRLDES report/program.
Can U help me in this Regard.
Ur Responses are most appreciated.

Hey Pathak,
The problem is, BI report is matching with the datails with R/3 LIKP table. But the business user is using Report WGSRLDES report/program, where the data is missmatching.
Hope U got my Point.

When syncing iPod the PC lost power. once power restored synced iPod but the sleeve detail has been blanked. Also when syncing a 'miss-match' message is reported on iTunes. how do I get the sleeve detail back onto iPod?

When syncing iPod the PC lost power. once power restored synced iPod but the sleeve detail has been blanked. Also when syncing a 'miss-match' message is reported on iTunes. how do I get the sleeve detail back onto iPod?

http://ww2.cs.fsu.edu/~rosentha/linux/2.6.26.5/docs/DocBook/libata/ch07.html#excatATAbusErr wrote:
ATA bus error means that data corruption occurred during transmission over ATA bus (SATA or PATA). This type of errors can be indicated by
ICRC or ABRT error as described in the section called “ATA/ATAPI device error (non-NCQ / non-CHECK CONDITION)”.
Controller-specific error completion with error information indicating transmission error.
On some controllers, command timeout. In this case, there may be a mechanism to determine that the timeout is due to transmission error.
Unknown/random errors, timeouts and all sorts of weirdities.
As described above, transmission errors can cause wide variety of symptoms ranging from device ICRC error to random device lockup, and, for many cases, there is no way to tell if an error condition is due to transmission error or not; therefore, it's necessary to employ some kind of heuristic when dealing with errors and timeouts. For example, encountering repetitive ABRT errors for known supported command is likely to indicate ATA bus error.
Once it's determined that ATA bus errors have possibly occurred, lowering ATA bus transmission speed is one of actions which may alleviate the problem.
I'd also add; make sure you have good backups when ATA errors are frequent

Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

Hi,
Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
Could you suggest on this issue.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Regards,
Rakesh

The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

Grand total values are not matching with Detail report

Report has grand totals and when I drill to the detail report, grand total values are NOT matching with parent report totals, I did some analysis but I'm clueless on this issue.
Please provide your thoughts and insight on this issue..
Thanks

is your summary and detail reports hitting different facts, like summary hitting aggregate and detail report hitting it's corresponding detail level fact..?
if then,
From Front-end:
Fix the filter values in detail report that are passing from master report then try delete each columns then check the grand total. If you found your values is matching by deleting particular column then you need to investigate what is the issue around with that dimension table..
From Database side:
1. check first aggregate table has proper aggregate data of it's detail..
2. Take the detail report obiee generated query and try to comment each dimension table and it's corresponding joins to the facts, (before, this delete all the dimensional columns and other measures from select statement and put only that measure where you are getting wrong value, so that you need not to comment all the select and group by columns which saves your time.. ). Need to check by commenting each dimensional wid and it's table from clause, if you found that values is matching then there is some problem with wid columns data population in your ETL.
Is that BI-Apps project?
btw, whtz ur name?

IPhone 6 Plus 16GB blue screen crashes: Read, error type:Address map hole or size mis-match

Hi folks,
Some time ago I had a 16GB 6+ and it crashed with the blue screen, so I returned it. I now have a brand new one that I got from Tmobile ($75 return fee) and although it has mostly worked just fine, I have gotten 2 blue screen crashes. Below are the details from the phone's log.
What strikes me is the message "Read, error type:Address map hole or size mis-match".
Does anyone know if this could be caused by a hardware defect?
I've gotten one of these crashes running iOS 8.1.2 and another in 8.1.3.
Thanks.
Incident Identifier: 20304759-E90B-453F-BDC5-176AF4E30041
CrashReporter Key:   fcf18d230005749957728546dea3221a0c588330
Hardware Model:      iPhone7,1
Date/Time:           2015-01-25 19:43:44.913 -0800
OS Version:          iOS 8.1.2 (12B440)
panic(cpu 0 caller 0xffffff8008cd45d0): L2C PIO error (src:core0-AF snoop, address:0x1202030208, access:Read, error type:Address map hole or size mis-match, L2C_ERR_STS:100003fc00000202, L2C_ERR_ADR:0x1108e1202030208, L2C_ERR_INF:0x2107)
Debugger message: panic
OS version: 12B440
Kernel version: Darwin Kernel Version 14.0.0: Mon Nov 3 22:27:30 PST 2014; root:xnu-2783.3.22~1/RELEASE_ARM64_T7000
iBoot version: iBoot-2261.3.33
secure boot?: YES
Paniclog version: 3
Kernel slide:     0x0000000006000000
Kernel text base: 0xffffff8008002000
Epoch Time:        sec       usec
Boot    : 0x54bc22ef 0x00000000
Sleep   : 0x54c58398 0x0002abb4
Wake    : 0x54c583ae 0x000f08df
Calendar: 0x54c5b7e3 0x00025045

same with my iPhone 4s 16gb
{"os_version":"iOS 8.1.3 (12B466)","bug_type":"110"}
Incident Identifier: 582496DB-6999-468C-9504-3D1C191B9F4B
CrashReporter Key: 623a577555e51ed110b937358adfa66fba3ea447
Hardware Model: iPhone4,1
Date/Time: 2015-02-20 04:17:50.830 +0300
OS Version: iOS 8.1.3 (12B466)
panic(cpu 0 caller 0x83dc8347): "i2c1::_checkBusStatus Bus is still in a bad state; last write status 00010110 xfer 00000000 fifo 00000000 for device als"
Debugger message: panic
OS version: 12B466
Kernel version: Darwin Kernel Version 14.0.0: Mon Jan 12 21:30:11 PST 2015; root:xnu-2783.3.26~3/RELEASE_ARM_S5L8940X
Kernel slide: 0x0000000003400000
Kernel text base: 0x83401000
Boot : 0x54e68884 0x00000000
Sleep : 0x54e68a7e 0x000dd6ac
Wake : 0x54e68b19 0x00035c02
Calendar: 0x54e68b1d 0x00040927
Panicked task 0x84a87c60: 13773 pages, 122 threads: pid 0: kernel_task
panicked thread: 0xc5066e80, backtrace: 0x81a33ca0
0x834ad94d
0x834adcb1
0x8341d5bd
0x83dc8347
0x83dc8059
0x83dc7e35
0x8389c601
0x8389c513
0x836f6f65
0x8389cc6d
0x8389ccc5
0x83a9f18d
0x83a9c27f
0x83a9c73f
0x83a9c90d
0x836f6f65
0x83a9c8e5
0x836e91e7
0x8343ed9b
0x834ab59c
Task 0x84a87c60: 13773 pages, 122 threads: pid 0: kernel_task
Task 0x84a87948: 771 pages, 3 threads: pid 1: launchd
Task 0x84a87000: 2016 pages, 13 threads: pid 17: UserEventAgent
Task 0x84a87630: 481 pages, 4 threads: pid 18: misd
Task 0x84a87318: 4114 pages, 22 threads: pid 19: CommCenter
Task 0x87a62948: 349 pages, 2 threads: pid 21: keybagd
Task 0x87a62318: 574 pages, 4 threads: pid 23: iaptransportd
Task 0x87a62000: 868 pages, 9 threads: pid 24: configd
Task 0x87a7ac60: 793 pages, 4 threads: pid 25: lockdownd
Task 0x87a7a948: 1218 pages, 6 threads: pid 26: imagent
Task 0x87a7a630: 2771 pages, 4 threads: pid 27: atc
Task 0x87a7a318: 792 pages, 2 threads: pid 28: fairplayd.H1
Task 0x87a7a000: 1571 pages, 14 threads: pid 29: aggregated
Task 0x87c4ac60: 1069 pages, 4 threads: pid 30: routined
Task 0x87c4a318: 707 pages, 5 threads: pid 33: timed
Task 0x87d23c60: 646 pages, 2 threads: pid 35: installd
Task 0x87d23948: 2383 pages, 11 threads: pid 36: mediaserverd
Task 0x87d23318: 1279 pages, 11 threads: pid 38: ubd
Task 0x87d23000: 249 pages, 7 threads: pid 39: syslogd
Task 0x87d6ac60: 410 pages, 2 threads: pid 40: softwareupdated
Task 0x87d6a948: 851 pages, 5 threads: pid 41: mediaremoted
Task 0x87d6a630: 1877 pages, 7 threads: pid 42: identityservices
Task 0x87d6a318: 9938 pages, 16 threads: pid 43: SpringBoard
Task 0x87d6a000: 453 pages, 2 threads: pid 44: fileproviderd
Task 0x87e25c60: 609 pages, 4 threads: p

Trail balance is not matching with fagll03 report

friends,
our trial balance is showing one value and fagllo3 individual gl is showing another value, particularly in entry view it is showing other value, it is showing some small difference. is there any program to match trail and fagll03.
regards,

Hi Team,
Greetings for the Day,
I have the same issue, please suggest me on this.
Trial Balance report for period 01-09, is not matching with the report from FAGLL03.
I would be highly obliged if you could suggest me on this, thanks.
Thanking in Advance,
Raghav.
[email protected]

Balances not match with FMEM report and FS10N GL wise

We have developed in report in funds management, it has to be executed based on commitment item and fund center not GL account wise. The report will have two rows actual budget and pan budget. The actual budget should match with GL account balance; it is matching for all GL account except 3 GL accounts. These 3 GL accounts balance is showing more than report balance for three periods (April, May and June).
Can I know in which I should check. Because I have tried with possibilities I couldnt get
thanks and regards

Hi,
In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
The reconsilation account form the Vendor
The G/L account where to posting is created on.
It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
Paul

Match code in report selection screen does not show any values for 0FISCPER

Hi Experts,
I have problem with selection screen in several reports. When I use match code for fiscal period selection I get only # as a possible value. I have checked the master data they seem to be correct. I work with 7.0 BW system. Can you please give me any hint what I should check?
Thank you,
Michal

Hi,
maybe I ask different way - how do you add characteristic values for a characteristic in the BEx? Is it automated somehow in SAP (e.g. from master data)? For the fiscal period I use custommer exit to fill in the default value, which is the current fiscal period. But this is something different, right?
<removed by moderator>
Michal
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Nov 14, 2008 3:55 PM

LV 8.0.1 Bug, no error when unflattening mis-matched data type

When unflattening a string and wiring a "type" that does not match the original format of the data, sometimes I don't get an error and I get no data. I've attached a VI written in 8.0.1 that illustrates 2 examples of this. In LV 7.1 these cases did return an error, but not in 8.0.1. Can anyone offer some insight or global solution?
Thanks, Chip
Attachments:
LV 8 Bug, no error trapped on mismatched type when unflattening string.vi ‏23 KB

Good afternoon,
Well, this certainly is an interesting situation. In the example “Unflatten string returns data
from previous iterations”, the second iteration of the for loop unflattens a
string as an array of strings type, this is obviously a type mismatch so if any
data is returned I wouldn’t expect it to be valid. What is even more interesting, is that if you
don’t use the auto indexing, but rather explicitly index the array there is no
error, but the data returned is like it was in 7.x. I tried to use the flatten function’s
“convert 7.x data function with no luck in either case. I filed a bug report on this issue (number
3X0CBC3A), but it seems to me the only workaround for now is going to be just
making sure the types match. I know this
is going to be inconvenient for you, and for that I apologize.
Incidentally, in many cases I wouldn’t necessarily expect an
error to be generated if the types don’t match.
This is because the flatten to string function takes your data and
converts it to a string which is nothing more than a byte[ ] of data with some
size information. When you “unflatten”
the function takes the string it is given, and attempts to reconstruct the data
in the format that is specified by the “type” input. If it can reconstruct the data from type,
regardless of the data returned I wouldn’t expect it to generate an error. Sometimes, however, an error can be detected
– if you flatten a double-precision number and unflatten to a single precision
number LabVIEW can detect that the incoming data represents something much
larger than a single precision number. I
suppose that LabVIEW 7 did a better job checking the size of the sting before
deciding whether or not to generate an error.
Again, I apologize for the problems this may cause. Please let me know if there is anything else
I can help with.
Travis M
LabVIEW R&D
National Instruments

Monthly Aggregate Values are Not matching between Two Reports

Hi,
I have two custom reports (Pivot Table View)
_1) National Report_ This report renders data for the 10/11 Season (From 04/01/2010 To 03/31/2011). It includes Monthly Aggregate as well as 10/11 Season Grand Total. This report shows the correct information. We don't have to do any changes.
_2) YOYOY Report_
This report renders data for the 10/11, 09/10, 08/09 Season (From 04/01/2008 To 03/31/2011). It includes Monthly Aggregate for each of the three seasons as well as Grand Total for each Season.
Issue:
Monthly Aggregate Total for the YOYOY Report is not matching with the National Report Monthly Aggregate Total.
Technical Background:
- For 10/11 Season, the expressions used to arrive at the Monthly Aggregate Total is the same.
- Filter Criteria for (1) Report is specific to 10/11 Season (Rest of the criteria is similar)
- Filter Criteria for (2) Report is for 08/09, 09/10, 10/11 Season (Rest of the criteria is similar)
- In Report (1), Date Expressions are based on the following Attributes
Column Name: Month
Expression: MONTHNAME(Activity."Created Date")
Column Name: Sort on Created Month
Expression: CASE MONTH(Activity."Created Date") WHEN 4 THEN 1 WHEN 5 THEN 2 WHEN 6 THEN 3 WHEN 7 THEN 4 WHEN 8 THEN 5 WHEN 9 THEN 6 WHEN 10 THEN 7 WHEN 11 THEN 8 WHEN 12 THEN 9 WHEN 1 THEN 10 WHEN 2 THEN 11 WHEN 3 THEN 12 END
Column Name: 10/11 Season
Expression: /* Metric column name: # of high risk infants identified since last visit */ CASE WHEN "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 END
Aggregation Rule: Sum
- In Report (2), Date Expressions are based on the following Attributes
Column Name: Month Column
Expression: Date."Calendar Month"
Column Name: Sort on Created Month
Expression: CASE Date."Calendar Month" WHEN 4 THEN 1 WHEN 5 THEN 2 WHEN 6 THEN 3 WHEN 7 THEN 4 WHEN 8 THEN 5 WHEN 9 THEN 6 WHEN 10 THEN 7 WHEN 11 THEN 8 WHEN 12 THEN 9 WHEN 1 THEN 10 WHEN 2 THEN 11 WHEN 3 THEN 12 END
Column Name: 10/11 Season
Expression: CASE WHEN Activity."Created Date" BETWEEN /* First Day of Current Season */ timestampadd(sql_tsi_day, -dayofmonth(current_date)+1, timestampadd(sql_tsi_month, -(month(current_date) - 4), Current_DATE)) AND Current_DATE THEN "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 ELSE 0 END
Aggregation Rule: Sum
Key Information:
- For 10/11 Season, Activity."Created Date" attribute is used for all the calculations based on date.
- For 08/09 and 09/10 Season, Date.Date attribute is used for all the calculations based on date. This is because the data was migrated from Asset Record Type to Activity Record Type for these seasons.
I have tried variety of options and nothing seems to get the Monthly Aggregate matching. Kindly suggest what changes do we require.
Regards,
Muddessar Nadeem Alanji
+91-98456 13180

Hi,
Are you saying that you loaded the same excel document to both planning area and cube but the data in both is not matching??
How did you load the excel data to planning area?
Can you give more details on what data is not matching? Is the cube value smaller than the value you see in planning book?
Secondly if you are looking at data, make sure your selections are right. In cube, you have to specify the characteristics and at the bottom of the screen you specify the number of records to be displayed. Increase that to some big number like 9999 so that you can see all the records.

Need to Match Result in Report to Data Provider

Hi!
My report is using an Excel file to populate my "Payout" data provider. The data provider has the following values
Performance/Payment/Level
10 pt /5% /1
15 pt /7% /2
My report is calculating a performance of 12 pt which I am trying to match against the "Payout" data provider to get the Payment of 5%. Is this possible in DeskI and if so how?
Any help you can provide will be appreciated.
Thanks!
Edited by: akrupa on Sep 25, 2009 8:45 PM
Edited by: akrupa on Sep 25, 2009 8:47 PM
Edited by: akrupa on Sep 25, 2009 8:49 PM

Hi,
If the number of payment levels is not to big you might concider to put them on one line in the excel file.
Like:
level 1 points | level 1 percentage | level 2 points | level 2 percentage
10 | 5 | 15 | 7
When you read that into BusinessObjects you can then assign the percentages by using the formula:
=If <performance> < <level 1 points> Then 0 Else If <performance> < <level 2 points> Then <level 1 percentage>
Else <level 2 percentage>
Regards,
Harry

Mis match in BW report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for