Mismatch between Employee Org Unit and HRP1001

Hi,
I am facing one peculiar issue. The Org Assignment for a person is showing a set of Position, Job and Org Unit. But when I check the HRP1001 table for that position, the OU Relation shown is different.
On prodding, user told me that, they have deleted the relations table completely and renamed Org units and loaded fresh relations (O-O, O-S).
My understanding is: PA0001 will pickup the relationship from HRP1001.
Please correct me if I am wrong and how do I rectify this issue,
Thanks & Regards,
Vijay

HI,
Look out for RHINTE Reports ( RHINTE00 -40) REports.
( T code - SA38) - RHINTE00... )
For more details on RHINTE reports look for existing posts on SDN.
Thanks & Regards,
Param

Similar Messages

  • Creation of Relationship between an Org Unit and ROSTER

    Hi All,
    I have Done All the Back end Settings For Roster.However when i am trying to Create relationship between Roster and an Org unit,there is no avaibility Of Rosters.Can Someone Please Guide me Out.
    Thanks,
    Punam

    HI,
    There are standard  relationship for Rosters (91 ,92 ,93 and 94),
    but befor doing all the configuration you have to activate switch for roster
    Go to transaction SHDG
    Choose the path Application Components-> payroll->India->India public sector.
    Click on change Global fields Icon and add the value as u2018Xu2019 for data element u201CPIN_SW_INPSu201D.
    Activate the entry
    Warm Regards,
    Kapil Kaushal

  • Employee works for 4 org units and want to distribute the cost to 4 cost ce

    Hi Experts,
    I am in the implementation phase, requirement gathering.
    I have scenerio where, Employee works for 4 org units and want to distribute the cost to 4 different cost centers.
    so that I can be able to find the exact cost occured for each Org unit.
    Please let me know how to map this in SAP?
    P oints will be rewarded fully
    Kindly dont post if you are not sure of your solution friends.
    Thanks
    Jay

    Hello,
    Infotype 0027 is the standard solution for multiple reporting / multi tasking in SAP.
    but also check which org unit he will be primarily assigned.
    Regards

  • How we will create relationship with org unit and task catalog

    HI Experts
    How we can create relationship between Org unit and Task Catalog in Organisation management once we grouped all the tasks in one group.
    For Example we have one org unit under that we have 3 depts those will consider as org units only.under 3 depts we have professor,Lecturer,Reader as jobs and positions also.If we create Professor tasks in task catalog which all the tasks will be assigned to positions as well.
    If it is Org unit and Task catalog how we can create relationship.
    Thanks
    Rajji

    Hi,
    Please try.
      DATA: lt_hrp1001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF P1001.
      DATA: lw_hrp1001        TYPE p1001.
      lw_hrp1001-mandt = sy-mandt.
      lw_hrp1001-plvar = parent_pos-plvar.
      lw_hrp1001-otype = parent_pos-otype.
      lw_hrp1001-objid = other_pos.
      lw_hrp1001-istat = parent_pos-istat.
      lw_hrp1001-begda = sy-datum.
      lw_hrp1001-endda = lc_endda.
      lw_hrp1001-infty = '1001'.
      lw_hrp1001-aedtm = sy-datum.
      lw_hrp1001-uname = sy-uname.
      lw_hrp1001-rsign = codes.
      lw_hrp1001-relat = relats.
      lw_hrp1001-sclas = lc_sclas.
      lw_hrp1001-sobid = cord_pos.
      append lw_hrp1001 to lt_hrp1001.
          CALL FUNCTION 'RH_INSERT_INFTY'
            EXPORTING
              fcode               = 'INSE'
              vtask               = 'S'
              commit_flg          = 'X'
            TABLES
              innnn               = lt_hrp1001
            EXCEPTIONS
              no_authorization    = 1
              error_during_insert = 2
              repid_form_initial  = 3
              corr_exit           = 4
              begda_greater_endda = 5
              OTHERS              = 6.
    Hope this helps.
    regards,
    Xiang Li

  • Fatal error C1900: Il mismatch between 'P1' version '20080116' and 'P2' version '20070207'

    Hi all,
    I have a Team Foundation Build Agent that has Visual Studio Team System 2008 Test Edition installed. One of the solutions that I compile with that Build Agent gives me the following errors:
      VCBUILD : fatal error C1047: The object or library file '.\bin\Release\main.obj' was created with an older compiler than other objects; rebuild old objects and libraries
      LINK : fatal error LNK1257: code generation failed
      VCBUILD : fatal error C1900: Il mismatch between 'P1' version '20080116' and 'P2' version '20070207'
      LINK : fatal error LNK1257: code generation failed
    I've searched online and found that other people have experienced the same problem:
    http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-c-compiler/topic/62516/
    http://nuicode.com/issues/266
    In the second posting one states "I had the same Error! After installing Service Pack1 for VS2008 it worked!". Thats great for him but I don't see any such update for the Test Edition of Visual Studio Team System 2008 - Test Edition.
    What can I do to get rid of that problem?
    Thanks!

    Hello ACKH
    I once handled a similar case in newsgroups. That case exhibit a almost same symptom. Please check out my summary below:
    Problem
    In that case, the customer has a DLL project that you had built on a machine where VS 2008 SP1 was installed. You then attempted to rebuild that project on a machine without SP1, and got a fatal compiler error C1900 “IL mismatch between ‘P1’ version ‘20080116’ and ‘P2’ version ‘20070207’”, and then LNK1257 “Code generation failed”. He found that rebuilding your static library alleviated the errors, but cannot accept this as a workaround because your clients will not have the ability to rebuild the libraries you distribute before they use them.
    Cause
    You had built the static library with the /GL (Whole Program Optimization) compiler switch, which requires Link Time Code Generation (/LTCG) when the static library is subsequently linked. These features require that all linked modules be built by the same version of the compiler. In fact, if precompiled headers are used, the same machine must build and link all the involved object code. Therefore, it is highly recommended that static libraries not be built with the /GL switch, since their intended use is quite frequently to support reuse by others.
    Solution
    You rebuilt the static library on your VS2008 SP1 machine without the /GL switch, and you no longer encounter this problem.
    Please let me know if this info is helpful to you or not.
    Regards,
    Jialiang Ge
    MSDN Subscriber Support in Forum
    If you have any feedback of our support, please contact [email protected]
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    Welcome to the All-In-One Code Framework! If you have any feedback, please tell us.

  • Output mismatch between BEx query output and WebI Report output

    Hi All,
    I have a BEx query in which there are only characteristics placed in rows.
    There are combinations of the values of the characteristics giving different records in the query output.
    Date is one of the characterisctics in the query output.
    There is an output mismatch between the query output and the WebI report output in the following case:
    When there are 'Not Assigned' or '#' or blank values, there are additional entries(rows) in the WebI report, giving repeating or wrong entries in the Date field. This is incorrect data.
    Is this because of the  'Not Assigned' or '#' or blank values of the Characteristics or is there any other reason?
    How do I fix this?
    Please helo me with this.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Srilakshmi B

    Hi Rajesh,
    I need to verify the WebI report output for records with # and 'Not assigned' values for the cHracteristics in the report.
    So I cannot check the WebI report by hiding the # or Not assigned values.
    The problem is that in the Query output the records are like these shown below:
    Char1                    CHar2                          CHar3                       Date field
    A                             B                                 C                                Date1
    #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)             No value
    Where as the WebI report output is as below:
    Char1                    CHar2                          CHar3                       Date field
    A                             B                                 C                                Date1
    #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)            Date1
    As shown here, there are wrong/repeating entries for the Date field in the WebI report output.
    Please check this and let me know what could be the issue and how do I fix it.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Srilakshmi B

  • Managing Org  units and Master Data in project structure

    How are Org units and Master data managed at the project structure? What would be the appropriate place holders for them in the structure. Should we manage it at the top of the project structure or within the  business scenarios/processes. On what basis should we decide this? How would this impact in case of a global template rollout?
    Please share your experiences regarding this.
    Thanks.
    Mike

    any talented  guy do this way.
    i think  that ur working  in E2E project work
    before  singoff ur business process u should give to ur users  master data templets..they collect for  masterdatas in before realization phase...that time  u should know  how many specifications is there and  in spections how  many in quantitative and how many qualitative u will indentify. if any query let me  back.
    Edited by: Lakshmiananda prasad on Oct 6, 2009 11:48 AM

  • Transport of org.units and structure

    Hi all
    I know there is a possibility to transport org.units and its structure (PPOMA_BBP). There are some settings to do in table T77S0 (key = TRSP.CORR) and 2 reports RHMOVE30 and/or RHMOVE50 to be used depending on the setting done in T77S0.
    It is also required to configure ALE distribution model with IDoc type HRMD_A.
    My question is: what do I have to include in the filter? What are the relevant info types to be replicated via ALE?
    We're on SRM 4.0 with SRM Server 5.0 SP08. We don't have HR module in SAP R/3 in use.
    Thanks anyone for some help regarding this one!
    Kind regards,
    Renaud

    Hi Renaud ,
    Yr business card does not carry ID.
    PL. mail me to have a detailed doc on yr question.
    [email protected]
    BR
    Dinesh

  • Org Unit and Cost Center not displaying in 0001 with A012 relationship

    Hi Guru's,
    Kindly help me in this regard ,
    Whenever i hire a person to a position which has an A012 relationship (Chief Position) then Org Units and Cost centres are not getting displayed in IT0001 .
    But when i hire a person in the same org unit with A003 relationship ; both Org units and Costcentres are getting displayed
    I have used an LSMW for uploading relationships and objects and i have also run integration reports for the same but still i am not able to display org unit and cost centre in it0001 when i hire a person with A012 relationship .
    Kindly Help

    both great advice, also, check this link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/14/d22fe48435d111950d0060b03c6b76/content.htm
    within this information there are various reports to run, which help recon OM and PA integration.  it will help you find your data problem and then fix the data for you if you follow step by step.
    best regards,
    michael

  • Org. unit and associated material groups download from Org. structure

    Hi,
    I want to download the material groups and associated material groups(Defined in External attributes) from organisation structure.
    Please suggest how to do it.
    Best regards,
    Sambit

    Hi. There's a point. You said you wanted to download a list so I presumed you wanted all the org units and all the material groups assigned to them.
    If you only want to do it 1 org unit at a time the function will work perfectly.
    I f you do want to see all I have had another thought actually.
    You could run program RHOMATTRIBUTES_REPLACE.
    This allows you to replace 1 attribute with another, but if you do not press the "change" button it works as a good report on attributes.
    If you just put in attibute PRCAT and then Old Value = Logical System of backend and New Value = Logical system of backend and tick substring then execute, it will show you all the org units and all the material groups.
    Just be careful not to press the replace button on the output, that would actually change data.
    Regards,
    Dave.

  • Creation org unit and subarea

    create  a org unit and a sub area

    Please describe your issue in detail.
    Create org-unit: PPOC_OLD
    Create sub-area: IMG--> Enterprise structure --> Definition --> Human Resourece Management --> Create Personnel Area/Subarea.

  • Is it possible to get a report showing Org Units and Number of Positions.

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    I am looking for a report about org units and no.of positions held by this org unit.
    eg :
    CEO(35)
      Department(35)
      ACS (5)                         ABC(30)                  
    AC1(2)  AC2(3)       AB1(10)  AB2(20)      
    The numbers in the brackets are all no. of positions under that org unit.
    I Hope you understand my request.
    Thanks

    S_AHR_61016512
    S_AHR_61016513
    and check the tcode SAP1 in that OM module reprots

  • There is a compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database

    HI,
    Taken backup form production environment through TSM backup utility and restore same db on UAT environment by TSM Utility, after restore got below issue, past i had done many time but working fine this time
    it’s not working. Production environment have SP2010 and sql server 2008 ,UAT have same thing also.
    Server Error in '/' Application.
    There is a
    compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database "Portal_Contain", and connections to the data have been blocked to due to this incompatibility. This can
    happen when a content database has not been upgraded to be within the compatibility range of the Web server, or if the database has been upgraded to a higher level than the web server. The Web server and the database must be upgraded to the same version and
    build level to return to compatibility range.
    Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current
    web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. 
    Exception Details: Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeCompatibilityException:
    There is a compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database "Portal_Contain", and connections to the data have been blocked to due to this incompatibility. This can happen when a content database has not been upgraded to be within
    the compatibility range of the Web server, or if the database has been upgraded to a higher level than the web server. The Web server and the database must be upgraded to the same version and build level to return to compatibility range.
    Source Error:
    An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack
    trace below.
    Stack Trace:
    [SPUpgradeCompatibilityException: There is a compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database "Portal_Contain", and connections to the data have been
    blocked to due to this incompatibility. This can happen when a content database has not been upgraded to be within the compatibility range of the Web server, or if the database has been upgraded to a higher level than the web server. The Web server and the
    database must be upgraded to the same version and build level to return to compatibility range.]
       Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPPersistedUpgradableObject.ValidateBackwardsCompatibility() +542
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSite.PreinitializeServer(SPRequest request) +63
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.InitializeSPRequest() +258
       Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.SPControl.EnsureSPWebRequest(SPWeb web) +365
       Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.SPControl.SPWebEnsureSPControl(HttpContext context) +520
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModule.GetContextWeb(HttpContext context) +27
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModule.PostResolveRequestCacheHandler(Object oSender, EventArgs ea) +918
       System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +80
       System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +171
    Hasan Jamal Siddiqui(MCTS,MCPD,ITIL@V3),Sharepoint and EPM Consultant,TCS
    |
    | Twitter

    Hi Bhavik,
    UAT Portal_Contain DB version given below:
    Version ID
    Version
    id
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.4518
    1
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6219
    3
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6327
    4
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6421
    5
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6510
    6
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6514
    7
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    14.0.6123.5006
    9
    1A707EF5-45B2-4235-9327-021E5F9B8BB0
    4.1.6.0
    8
    6333368D-85F0-4EF5-8241-5252B12B2E50
    4.1.18.0
    2
    Production Version given below:
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.4518
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6219
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6327
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6421
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6510
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6514
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    14.0.6123.5006
    1A707EF5-45B2-4235-9327-021E5F9B8BB0
    4.1.6.0
    6333368D-85F0-4EF5-8241-5252B12B2E50
    4.1.18.0
    I have matched both are the exact same.
    Run the below command on App server:
    Upgrade-SPContentDatabase
    cmdlet Upgrade-SPContentDatabase at command pipeline position 1
    Supply values for the following parameters:
    Identity: Portal_Contain
    Confirm
    Are you sure you want to perform this action?
    Performing operation "Upgrade-SPContentDatabase" on Target "Portal_Contain".
    [Y] Yes  [A] Yes to All  [N] No  [L] No to All  [S] Suspend  [?] Help
    (default is "Y"):y
    WARNING: Database [SPContentDatabase Name=Portal_Contain] cannot be upgraded.
    Kindly suggest 
    Hasan Jamal Siddiqui(MCTS,MCPD,ITIL@V3),Sharepoint and EPM Consultant,TCS
    |
    | Twitter

  • BP - Employee relationships to an org unit and changes

    Dear Colleagues of CRM,
    The scenario pertains to an employee and its relationship to an org unit to which it is assigned. Once an employee is assigned to an org unit, a relationship too gets created with the Employee as BP. This relationship has the contact info that was available in the BP master data at that point of time.
    Later on, if the employee is transferred and hence assigned to another org unit, the assignment in the org unit is changed to the new org unit. On the new org unit assignment, a new relationship gets created with the BP. However, the earlier relationship doesn't get deleted when the earlier assignment to the org unit was deleted. If I attempt to delete the relationship in the BP, it doesn't allow and prompts to u201Cu2026.Change through the HR mastersu201D.  The HR master though has nothing of the contact details vis-à-vis this relationship.
    The existence of this initial relationship is causing error in all my dependent programs / activities which pick up the contact details of this employee and hence trigger emails etc.
    Request solution as to how do I remove this u2018oldu2019 and irrelevant relationship from the BP. It may be noted that the subsequent changes of assignment u2013 deletions in particular u2013 are deleting the relationship too but the initial one exists all throughout.
    Seek your kind advise to resolve the matter .
    Regards,
    Tariq

    Contact SAP they have given two custom reports to check and repair BUT050 entries when we have similar issue.
    Regards,
    Rajesh.

  • Org Unit and linked people

    Hello everybody,
    I have a requirement to show the Org Units available in the system, I found a table (HRP1000 or HRP1001) where I can get it, but I nedd also to show the personnel linked to each Org Unit, does anybody know how can I do it?
    Is it posible??
    Thanks
    Gabriel P.

    You can create a range for this value...
    SOBID LIKE HRP1001-SOBID,
    And linked them with PA0001 table -;)
    HRP1001-SOBID ==> P0001-ORGEH.
    Greetings,
    Blag.

Maybe you are looking for

  • PLEASE HELP. Cannot open a PDF document via a link in an email. I am using Mac 10.7.5 and Firefox.

    If I receive a PDF document attached to an email by way of an icon, I can double click on the PDF icon and the document opens. HOWEVER, if I receive a link to a PDF document in an email, and I click on the link which leads me to a webpage with anothe

  • Possible to autocreate task from Technician Portal when creating SR?

    I have this question: Is it possible to automatically create a task (and assignment) when creatin a SR in Technician Portal (Field Service)? There is setup for creating automatically tasks and even assigning them to a resource when working in Service

  • TIME_OUT runtime error for Zreport in only Production server.

    Hi Experts,                  I have created one new Zreport which is working well in Development & Quality Server for given input. but same report is giving run time error  in Production server for same input resulting into error TIME_OUT.  Short tex

  • To activate Print Program

    How do we activate pritn program..?? When i click on Time Statement for Chosen Period in ESS buiness package i get Foolllowing error :- Print program not activated for form SAP_TIMESLIP:

  • Photoshop/Vista issues?

    I have an old version of Photoshop (5) running on a Vista operating system.  Recently it ground to a halt, so I uninstalled it and attempted to re-install from the original disk.  The setup panel displayed ok, but Photoshop did not install and the pr