Mismatch between inicident classification list and notification

Hi,
we customized incident classification list in order to have three levels.
Incident classification field template has this visible effect:
When end user receive notification that field reports only last level:
How can I get CLASSIFICATION notification reports all above item instead of only last one ?
FYI below how Incident Classification list was built:
Grazie mille Alex

Hi,
What you see in the console is just a presentation of chain of the classifications that includes all of the parent classifications.
For me the good way is to use classification like this :
End user ict services - ocs - Collaboration ....
End user ict services - ocs - xxxxx
End user ict services - ocs - yyyyyy
instead of :
End user itc service
                            ocs
                                  Collaboration ....
                                  xxxxxxxxxxx
                                  yyyyyyyyyyyy
Remy BOVI

Similar Messages

  • Fatal error C1900: Il mismatch between 'P1' version '20080116' and 'P2' version '20070207'

    Hi all,
    I have a Team Foundation Build Agent that has Visual Studio Team System 2008 Test Edition installed. One of the solutions that I compile with that Build Agent gives me the following errors:
      VCBUILD : fatal error C1047: The object or library file '.\bin\Release\main.obj' was created with an older compiler than other objects; rebuild old objects and libraries
      LINK : fatal error LNK1257: code generation failed
      VCBUILD : fatal error C1900: Il mismatch between 'P1' version '20080116' and 'P2' version '20070207'
      LINK : fatal error LNK1257: code generation failed
    I've searched online and found that other people have experienced the same problem:
    http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-c-compiler/topic/62516/
    http://nuicode.com/issues/266
    In the second posting one states "I had the same Error! After installing Service Pack1 for VS2008 it worked!". Thats great for him but I don't see any such update for the Test Edition of Visual Studio Team System 2008 - Test Edition.
    What can I do to get rid of that problem?
    Thanks!

    Hello ACKH
    I once handled a similar case in newsgroups. That case exhibit a almost same symptom. Please check out my summary below:
    Problem
    In that case, the customer has a DLL project that you had built on a machine where VS 2008 SP1 was installed. You then attempted to rebuild that project on a machine without SP1, and got a fatal compiler error C1900 “IL mismatch between ‘P1’ version ‘20080116’ and ‘P2’ version ‘20070207’”, and then LNK1257 “Code generation failed”. He found that rebuilding your static library alleviated the errors, but cannot accept this as a workaround because your clients will not have the ability to rebuild the libraries you distribute before they use them.
    Cause
    You had built the static library with the /GL (Whole Program Optimization) compiler switch, which requires Link Time Code Generation (/LTCG) when the static library is subsequently linked. These features require that all linked modules be built by the same version of the compiler. In fact, if precompiled headers are used, the same machine must build and link all the involved object code. Therefore, it is highly recommended that static libraries not be built with the /GL switch, since their intended use is quite frequently to support reuse by others.
    Solution
    You rebuilt the static library on your VS2008 SP1 machine without the /GL switch, and you no longer encounter this problem.
    Please let me know if this info is helpful to you or not.
    Regards,
    Jialiang Ge
    MSDN Subscriber Support in Forum
    If you have any feedback of our support, please contact [email protected]
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    Welcome to the All-In-One Code Framework! If you have any feedback, please tell us.

  • Output mismatch between BEx query output and WebI Report output

    Hi All,
    I have a BEx query in which there are only characteristics placed in rows.
    There are combinations of the values of the characteristics giving different records in the query output.
    Date is one of the characterisctics in the query output.
    There is an output mismatch between the query output and the WebI report output in the following case:
    When there are 'Not Assigned' or '#' or blank values, there are additional entries(rows) in the WebI report, giving repeating or wrong entries in the Date field. This is incorrect data.
    Is this because of the  'Not Assigned' or '#' or blank values of the Characteristics or is there any other reason?
    How do I fix this?
    Please helo me with this.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Srilakshmi B

    Hi Rajesh,
    I need to verify the WebI report output for records with # and 'Not assigned' values for the cHracteristics in the report.
    So I cannot check the WebI report by hiding the # or Not assigned values.
    The problem is that in the Query output the records are like these shown below:
    Char1                    CHar2                          CHar3                       Date field
    A                             B                                 C                                Date1
    #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)             No value
    Where as the WebI report output is as below:
    Char1                    CHar2                          CHar3                       Date field
    A                             B                                 C                                Date1
    #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)            Date1
    As shown here, there are wrong/repeating entries for the Date field in the WebI report output.
    Please check this and let me know what could be the issue and how do I fix it.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Srilakshmi B

  • There is a compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database

    HI,
    Taken backup form production environment through TSM backup utility and restore same db on UAT environment by TSM Utility, after restore got below issue, past i had done many time but working fine this time
    it’s not working. Production environment have SP2010 and sql server 2008 ,UAT have same thing also.
    Server Error in '/' Application.
    There is a
    compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database "Portal_Contain", and connections to the data have been blocked to due to this incompatibility. This can
    happen when a content database has not been upgraded to be within the compatibility range of the Web server, or if the database has been upgraded to a higher level than the web server. The Web server and the database must be upgraded to the same version and
    build level to return to compatibility range.
    Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current
    web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. 
    Exception Details: Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeCompatibilityException:
    There is a compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database "Portal_Contain", and connections to the data have been blocked to due to this incompatibility. This can happen when a content database has not been upgraded to be within
    the compatibility range of the Web server, or if the database has been upgraded to a higher level than the web server. The Web server and the database must be upgraded to the same version and build level to return to compatibility range.
    Source Error:
    An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack
    trace below.
    Stack Trace:
    [SPUpgradeCompatibilityException: There is a compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database "Portal_Contain", and connections to the data have been
    blocked to due to this incompatibility. This can happen when a content database has not been upgraded to be within the compatibility range of the Web server, or if the database has been upgraded to a higher level than the web server. The Web server and the
    database must be upgraded to the same version and build level to return to compatibility range.]
       Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPPersistedUpgradableObject.ValidateBackwardsCompatibility() +542
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSite.PreinitializeServer(SPRequest request) +63
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.InitializeSPRequest() +258
       Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.SPControl.EnsureSPWebRequest(SPWeb web) +365
       Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.SPControl.SPWebEnsureSPControl(HttpContext context) +520
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModule.GetContextWeb(HttpContext context) +27
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModule.PostResolveRequestCacheHandler(Object oSender, EventArgs ea) +918
       System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +80
       System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +171
    Hasan Jamal Siddiqui(MCTS,MCPD,ITIL@V3),Sharepoint and EPM Consultant,TCS
    |
    | Twitter

    Hi Bhavik,
    UAT Portal_Contain DB version given below:
    Version ID
    Version
    id
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.4518
    1
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6219
    3
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6327
    4
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6421
    5
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6510
    6
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6514
    7
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    14.0.6123.5006
    9
    1A707EF5-45B2-4235-9327-021E5F9B8BB0
    4.1.6.0
    8
    6333368D-85F0-4EF5-8241-5252B12B2E50
    4.1.18.0
    2
    Production Version given below:
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.4518
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6219
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6327
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6421
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6510
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6514
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    14.0.6123.5006
    1A707EF5-45B2-4235-9327-021E5F9B8BB0
    4.1.6.0
    6333368D-85F0-4EF5-8241-5252B12B2E50
    4.1.18.0
    I have matched both are the exact same.
    Run the below command on App server:
    Upgrade-SPContentDatabase
    cmdlet Upgrade-SPContentDatabase at command pipeline position 1
    Supply values for the following parameters:
    Identity: Portal_Contain
    Confirm
    Are you sure you want to perform this action?
    Performing operation "Upgrade-SPContentDatabase" on Target "Portal_Contain".
    [Y] Yes  [A] Yes to All  [N] No  [L] No to All  [S] Suspend  [?] Help
    (default is "Y"):y
    WARNING: Database [SPContentDatabase Name=Portal_Contain] cannot be upgraded.
    Kindly suggest 
    Hasan Jamal Siddiqui(MCTS,MCPD,ITIL@V3),Sharepoint and EPM Consultant,TCS
    |
    | Twitter

  • IDoc structure mismatch between SAP R/3 and PI

    Hi,
    There is an interface in PI which receives IDoc from SAP R/3 system. I have been facing an issue of IDoc structure mismatch (in terms of data present in it) between SAP R/3 and when PI receives the IDoc.
    To be more precise,
    In SAP R/3 system, the value ABC is present in the field DOCNUM in the IDoc.
    But when the PI receives the same IDoc from SAP R/3 (as seen in Integration Engine), the value ABC is present in a different field and the DOCNUM field is empty.
    <DOCNUM></DOCNUM>
    <ARCKEY>ABC</ARCKEY>
    The first step towards resolution was to delete and reimport the IDoc metadata from SAP R/3 in PI system using IDX2, which did not help in this case.
    Could anyone please help in resolving the field mismatch between the IDoc triggered from SAP R/3 and the IDoc received by PI.
    Regards,
    Prajeet

    Hi Prajeet,
    it's long ago but your question has not been finally solved, so let me try to give you an answer. We are facing the same problem after patching our PI.
    I think the reason for the different behaviour is related to SAP note 1233908, where SAP has changed the IDoc adapter.
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1233908
    Regards,
    Lars

  • Large Blank/grey area between  recieved email list and actual message HELP!

    This happened suddenly when trying to show off the features of to do. all I did was delete the to do in the email message I was in and the email went hay wire sending a bunch of blank notes and now there is a blank/grey area between every message and the list of emails. The space is very large about 3 inches in length.
    Thanks for the help

    No problem. I think it is worth posting these things so Apple know and so others know. I have a number of issues and I was thinking about going back and doing and Archive and Install in case they had been caused by me just doing the upgrade. But when I see the issues come up here I know it's probably a bug. Like you say quite a few of them
    Michael

  • Why the difference between the Extension list and the Plug-in list

    On my Extension list I can see -
    Java Console 6.0.22 Enable
    Java Console 6.0.23 Enable
    Java Console 6.0.24 Enable
    Java Console 6.0.25 Disable
    The old versions have been disabled.
    On the Plug-in list I can see -
    Java Deplyment Toolkit 6.0.250.6
    Java Platform SE 6 U25
    If I check via the Control Panel I appear to have only
    Java 6 Update 25 installed.
    Why the discrepancy?
    Why do I still see references to older versions, and presumably not on the computer any more, shown on the Extensions list?

    That link was most helpful. Opening FireFox as an Admin, something I had never thought of, allowed me to remove the dead wood from the 'Extensions' display.
    Previously, the only way I could be certain exactly what was actually available was by visiting Control Panel ... Programs and Features
    Thanks to both of you for your interest.

  • Meeting time mismatch between MS Outlook 2011 and iCal

    Devices:
    Mac Air running OS X 10.10 with MS Office 2011 (Outlook via IMAP) - no Exchange.
    Also running Mail concurrently via IMAP.
    iPhone 6+ running iOS 8.2.
    Time Zone:
    New Zealand on daylight saving - UTC/GMT +13:00
    Background:
    I have using both Microsoft and Apple Mail and Calendar (iCal) platforms concurrently on various MacBooks etc for at least 5 years i.e. previously MS Entourage 2008 (?) now Outlook 2011. Once upon a time Entourage/Outlook & Mail/iCal used to sync quite nicely via iTunes and sync services but then that functionality was taken away from us in Mavericks. There was a lot of fuss about this!
    I managed to find a work around that worked for me. Far more detail can be found in a previous thread https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5479205  but in short I found I could drag calendar and contacts from Outlook to iCal & Contacts and vice versa without too much fuss for my volume of meetings etc.
    Once meetings and contacts were in iCal and Contacts then iCloud made sure they synced with my iPhone - YAY!!!
    THAT ALL CHANGED AGAIN WITH YOSEMITE !!!!!!
    Problem:
    It would seem that since upgrading to Yosemite I am experiencing serious TIME ZONE discrepancies between Meeting requests in Outlook and OS X / IOS.
    Example:
    1. Meeting request created in Outlook from external 3rd party contact received for Sunday, 23 November 2014 10.00am - 12.00pm
    Shows correctly in Outlook
    OS X & iOS show event exactly 13 hours later @ Sunday, 23 November 11.00pm - 1.00am
    This is exactly the time difference between GMT/UTC and NZT (or GMT/UTC +13:00)
    Because meeting/event is from a 3rd party the date/time cannot be edited.
    Accepting locks it in at the wrong time which ends up being synced to iPhone.
    2. Meeting request created by 'self' in Outlook and dragged onto iCal in OS X for Saturday, 13 December 2014 3.30pm - 4.00pm
    Shows correctly in Outlook (as you'd expect!)
    The instant its dragged across the iCal 'Adding a new event' pop up box appears.
    Click 'OK' and for literally 2 seconds it's displayed as the right day and time ...
    BUT THEN it jumps (moves) to Saturday, 14 December 2014 4.30am - 5.00am!!! Exactly 13 hours later.
    When iOS updates via iCloud it also shows the event @ Saturday, 14 December 2014 4.30am - 5.00am.
    Log on to iCloud (web calendar) and it's the same.
    Again this is exactly the time difference between GMT/UTC and NZT (or GMT/UTC +13:00).
    NOW CHECK THIS OUT - double click event in iCal OR iCloud web calendar and it shows the details as "13 December 3.30pm - 4.00pm (GMT)"
    See images -
    3. Meeting request created by 'self' in Outlook and dragged onto iCal in OS X for Friday, 7 December 2014 12.00pm - 1.30pm PLUS added and sent to invitee
    Shows correctly in Outlook (as you'd expect!)
    The instant its dragged across the iCal 'Adding a new event' pop up box appears.
    Click 'OK' and for literally 2 seconds it's displayed as the right day and time ...
    BUT THEN it jumps (moves) to Saturday, 8 November 2014 1.00am - 2.30am.
    So everything else is as previously described ... the EXCEPTION here is the person who I sent the invite to.
    They received it in OS X Mail and iOS - it also appeared in their calendars Saturday, 8 November 2014 1.00am - 2.30am rather than the more suitable time for a Friday business lunch!!
    Given this worked fine under Mavericks and the only thing to have changed is an upgrade to Yosemite then there has to be a bug in Yosemite??
    I've attempted to be as thorough with my testing as possible but whilst I am in IT Sales and Business Dev, I am not an engineer!! Therefore I am very keen to hear from any far more intelligent being that suggest other tests, what I should do next or better still how to fix it !!!!
    Now I shall sit and wait for the arrival of great and profound wisdom ... yes, still smiling but I don't know for how long!!

    So no replies/comments but lots of views ... either means I haven't reached someone who's prepared to tackle this one or everyone thinks I'm a Muppet for doing things the way I do!!
    Because of the many views and at least 2 persons who have indicated they have the same issue ...
    UPDATE:
    So much research!!! Would appear that Outlook is designed to send calendar events in UTC/GMT time irrespective of local - don't quote me! That being the case that would explain why the events I had issues with turn up with showing GMT. Would also suggest that for some reason iCal cannot see inside to translate the actual time ... anyway ... moving on.
    So at this point I need to say I have turned off in Mac Mail preferences "Add invitations to Calendar - Automatically" and set to "Never" ... I will try testing with that "on" again later.
    For now here's a kludged workaround for at least the process that I use i.e. dragging meetings from Outlook to iCal to sync via iCloud to my iPhone.
    Before I would drag the Outlook event (straight from Outlook's calendar) onto the iCal icon (sorry realize I hadn't perhaps been explicit on that before) ... that would then open iCal if not already open and then 'pop' the 'Adding a new event' box ... click 'OK' and it'd be entered with the same alert time etc ... that once worked, then broke hence this post!!
    So what I've found that does work (with some shortcomings) is (and easier if you're running dual screens!!):
    Open iCal - best if you use Day view
    Drag the Outlook event to that day and to the correct time
    N.B.: Duration, Category and Alert information is lost
    Open event in iCal and edit the above
    Syncs immediately to iCloud and in its own good time to iPhone
    I have tested this against my original examples:
    Example 1 - Works for events/meetings received from external Outlook source - you can open and edit the time and alerts. Not sure if it creates any grief or extra clutter at the senders end!! Guess I'll hear about that soon enough.
    Example 2 - Works for events/meetings created by me in Outlook and dragged over - same deal - still have to edit duration and alerts etc.
    Example 3 - Hmmmm ... haven't tried adding an invitee who I know is an iCal only user yet. I expect that if sent from Outlook he's still going to have it show up wrong at his end so will be a set of instructions and training I expect. I have an idea that may work ... will have to test.
    SORRY - I said it was a Kludge.
    I will see if this approach remains stable for a bit before turning back on the "Add invitations to Calendar - Automatically" setting in Mail.
    I'll report back again after that.

  • Difference between website data usage and notifications

    I check my data usage on the Verizon wireless website frequently.  Yesterday it showed 5.7 GB used with 4.3 approx remaining and one day left before rolling over. Yet the day before I received a notification I had used 75% of my plan, and this morning another one indicating 90% usage, yet the website showed something entirely different.  So why the difference?

    I check my data usage on the Verizon wireless website frequently.  Yesterday it showed 5.7 GB used with 4.3 approx remaining and one day left before rolling over. Yet the day before I received a notification I had used 75% of my plan, and this morning another one indicating 90% usage, yet the website showed something entirely different.  So why the difference?

  • Huge mismatch between iPod 'available' space and iTunes 'free space'

    My iPod Nano reports (using the About menu):
    Capacity = 3.7 GB
    Available = 1.8 GB
    which feels about right (430 songs loaded). However, when plugged into iTunes for Windows 6.0.2, iTunes says about this iPod:
    Used = 3.64 GB
    Free = 95 MB
    and won't let me load any more music onto the iPod beyond what it "thinks" is the free capacity. What gives???
    Thanks, all!

    C17, welcome to discussions! The only way to resolve a capacity conflict like the one you seem to be having with your Nano/iTunes is to restore the Nano. The following link will give you complete instructions.
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=60983

  • Mismatch between Employee Org Unit and HRP1001

    Hi,
    I am facing one peculiar issue. The Org Assignment for a person is showing a set of Position, Job and Org Unit. But when I check the HRP1001 table for that position, the OU Relation shown is different.
    On prodding, user told me that, they have deleted the relations table completely and renamed Org units and loaded fresh relations (O-O, O-S).
    My understanding is: PA0001 will pickup the relationship from HRP1001.
    Please correct me if I am wrong and how do I rectify this issue,
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vijay

    HI,
    Look out for RHINTE Reports ( RHINTE00 -40) REports.
    ( T code - SA38) - RHINTE00... )
    For more details on RHINTE reports look for existing posts on SDN.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Param

  • Date format mismatch between OIM 11gR2 GTC and backend custom database table (Oracle 11g R2)

    Hi,
    We have an OIM 11g R2 version running that has a GTC installed and configured. The GTC is used to provision to a 11g R2 database table via the DBAT 9.1.0.5.0 connector. Now the requirement is that the timestamp be recorded in the backend DB when a new record is provisioned to it using the GTC.
    During the setup of the GTC, the target system date format is asked for should be one from among the values allowed by the following predefined formats:
    Customizing Formats (The Java&amp;trade; Tutorials &amp;gt; Internationalization &amp;gt; Formatting)
    Now our problem is that the target DB to which the provisioning is supposed to happen, isn't under our control and hence we cannot change its schema, and the date format in that table is of the type "01-JAN-10 12.00.00.000000000 AM", which translates to "dd-MMM-yy hh.mm.ss.fffffffff (AM/PM)".
    On the other hand, as you can see from the above link, none of the values that OIM allows to be passed through the GTC allow for that format to be used.
    Does anyone know of any way in which we can intercept the GTC provisioning request and convert the date on the fly, after OIM has passed on the control, but before the values are written into the DB table, or does anyone know of any workarounds to this issue?
    I'd really appreciate it if someone could provide a solution to this.
    Thanks.

    [http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/refsched.htm#CIHBFCJG]
    See 26.6 for the plugin.zip directory structure, and as I said, I used the same method on a previous task in the same OIM instance.
    Edited by: 939908 on Jan 31, 2013 8:04 AM

  • Mismatch between the bean code and generated code

    Hello all,
    I am running WL7.0Sp2 on Winnt4.0Sp6 connecting to Oracle 8.17. I have been running
    my app on this server for a while (all my beans deployed ok, WL started up fine,
    no problems). From last week, all of a sudden, I am getting the error attached
    when I am trying to deploy just one bean (?). The weird thing is it deploys fine
    in every other env. except fine (so I am guessing something must have gone awry
    in my class path) but I cant figure this out?
    Any ideas? suggestions?
    Thanks
    Sury
    [deploy_error.txt]

    To be sure, I'd recompile the jar and also make sure that
    none of the Bean related interfaces are reachable from the
    server's CLASSPATH.

  • Apparent version mismatch between DOS java -showversion and Test JVM

    Howdy! I have an application, BBed, which is billed as "a Java-based standalone offline BBcode editor". The instructions say to unpack the jar file (java -jar bbed.jar) using the DOS command window. This app needs Java 1.4.2 and 1.5. When I do java -showversion at the command prompt, I get
    java version "1.3.1_02"
    Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_02-b02)
    Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.1_02-b02, mixed mode)
    However, when I run the Test JVM applet on the Java website, it assures me that I have 1.6. And the version of the Java Console in XP's Control Panel says "1.6.0_02-b06". Further, both FireFox 2.0 and Netscape 7.2 show that I have 1.6.0_02 plugins.
    How do I get JVM 1.6.0_02 to show up in the DOS window, so I can get this app to run?

    This was solved. The HPUX 'had' process (a few patches behind) had gone rogue and was eating up hundreds of Mb of memory as well as upsetting the box in general. Furthermore, the box is low on memory.
    The JDBC is still working slowly compared with the UAT box looking at its own database but that's a separate issue.

  • Integration between Custom list and task list

    Is it advisable to provide solutions for the integration between custom list and tasks list in SharePoint?
    I am working on a scenario where the data has to be segregated between multiple lists and there will be transactions among these lists using workflow. Some of the capabilities in Tasks list like due date notifications, calendar, tracking are needed
    on the transaction. Since these lists are based out of different content types, is it advisable to choose these lists for solutions?
    When we have to make few updates through workflow from custom list to tasks, will there be any problem in the transactions as it is two different content type?
    Vijayaragavan, MCTS

    Since SPLists and SharePoint workflows don't provide inherent
    support for transactions, you have to handle rollback operations yourself.
    The easiest way to simulate a transaction is to read in the state of any list item you are changing prior to executing an update, and then write that state back should you detect a failure. It's not a perfect solution, since a sufficiently severe error might
    prevent your rollback updates as well. That's the price you pay for not having the data store support transactions.
    That being said, while it's true many clients will ask for business critical data to be stored in SPLists, I would argue that it's your job to convince them that it's not a good idea, and that transactional databases accessed over webservices are a much safer
    SP compatible way to store important data - from
    stackoverflow
    [custom.development]

Maybe you are looking for