ML81N check a value of service line

Hi expert,
I am creating a new document from ml81n .
I want to check the values of service line.
Could you help me to find a badi or exit ?
Regards Antonella

Sorry,
I want to check the values of Account Assignment and not the value of Service line.
Could you help me ?
Regards

Similar Messages

Sum of values exceeds the allowed maximum value per service line

Hi Guys,
While creating PO wrt to contract : I get error msg : Sum of values exceeds the allowed maximum value per service line Message no. SE402. Can I change it to warning or should I bifurcate one line into two , as the value is very big. Totalling to 11 characters excluding decimal. Its like xxx,xxx,xxx.xx inr.
Regards,
SK

Hi,
For service line items, the maximum allowed limit is 999999999.99 (total 11 digits including 2 decimals) as per design. If you want more than that, you may split the service in to two line items.
The note: 1810281 - System does not issue error message SE 402 explains the logic.
Regards,
AKPT

Mvt. 101 with ML81N for service entry sheet split for every service line

Dear guru.
I have one purchase order position for service (item category D) with three different service line.
I run ML81N and i create the service entry sheet for every service line.
If I see the goods receipts movement generate , the system show 1 movement line with qty 1 and the total of amount in LC of the 3 service line.
Does exist a chance in order that system create 3 different movement lines for every service line with quantity and amount specific.
Thanks

Hi,
I think you have create Service PO with description & UOM .
then that you have mention activity for services ( Service line) . But if you mention n number of service line that all values acumulate to service line of line item.
so, you can't get different entery in accounting document & material document. this always w r t line item of the service PO.
You have to note one think all the service line tiem is unter the line item 10 only.
just check your PO in ME23N.
SAM

How to Check Creation/Change data for PO Service Line item

Hi, I was wondering what field(s) from what table(s) I would have to check if I wanted a report to look for the creation or chnaged date of a specific service item in a PO?
Currently it is using the EKPO-AEDAT field to check if a PO line item has been changed, but I would like to narrow it down to just some service line items instead of capturing all the service lines in a recently changed PO line item.
Thank you very much in advance for the advice!

Hi Rashid, thanks for the advice, but it doesn't really solve my problem.
What I want to know is if there is a field where the date of a service item was created in a PO line item is stored, so that an ABAP report can be written to retrieve newly created service items from POs.

Value Limit in Service Line

Hi All,
While doing a service order and entering the item in service line with a total value of more than 100 crores I am getting a error message no.SE370 that Value of line exceed allowed value limit.But I did not find the message SE370 in the attributes of System Message neither in PO environment data nor in Service environment data.Where this value limit is mantained .Or how to get rid of this message which I am getting .From the message in SE area although I am getting the message number deleting the same what will be the repurcussion .
Dhruba

Hi,
IN overall llimit field also it is not taking more than 100 crores and same message appears.Even while creating MK contract with K+D in service line when the value becomes 100 croes the same message appears.I think there may be some table where the value limit gets defined.
Has any one experienced such problem ,please answer .
Dhruba
Edited by: Dhruba Charan Behera on Feb 8, 2008 9:22 AM

Service PO Services Line number value

Hi,
We have an SRM 5.0 Extended Classic system linked to an ECC6 backend system. We have applied a note to correct a service line number problem in ERP but we're getting results that seem odd. I would appreciate if someone could verify the following in their backend system.
Create a mixed PO in SRM where the first 2 lines are service lines and the 3rd is a material line. Order the PO and verify the ERP PO. The ERP PO should have 2 line items and 2 service line items numbered 10 and 20.
Now change the PO in SRM by adding another service line after the material line and then order the PO.
In ERP, what is the line number of the new service line. Is it 30 or 40.
I would appreciate anyones help.
Regards,
Jerry

HI,
In FORM fill_bapi_srvitem, a call to FM 'BBP_SRV_PD_MAP_BE' is
made, where a separate outline is then hardcoded on top of the service
item table passed in:
IF NOT it_pd_item[] IS INITIAL.
    map service data                                                 *
    lv_line_no = 1.                                           "Outline
    et_be_services-pckg_no    = 1.
    et_be_services-line_no    = lv_line_no.
    et_be_services-outl_level = '0'.
    et_be_services-outl_ind   = c_on.
    et_be_services-subpckg_no = 2.
    et_be_services-from_line = 1.
    APPEND et_be_services.
    LOOP AT it_pd_item.                                        "items
      lv_line_no = lv_line_no + 1.
This way, when the service line item is passed into the backend, the
actual service item has the original item number from SRM,
e.g. 0000000002, and the backend outline on top of the service always
starts with 1 (see above codings) which is generated during
the mapping, not the original SRM outline.
Summer

How to create 'Planned service line' using BAPI_ENTRYSHEET_CREATE? Pl. help

I need to create service entry sheet ( SES ) using input data from text file through BAPI_ENTRYSHEET_CREATE.
If the input contains service line items, which are not present in PO, it should be treated as an unplanned service and correspondingly 'unplanned' indicator is to be set on ML81N ( Service netry sheet ) display.
I want to make an entry unplanned if the input field external no. ( Field: BAPIESLLC-EXT_LINE ) is not matching with external no. field of corresponding purchase order to which the SES refers.
The BAPI works fine for all cases except one. If the unplanned service line contains field SERVICE_NO value which is matching with a SERVICE_NO in PO, it is invariable treated by BAPI as 'PLANNED'. ie. BAPI decides whenther a service line is planned or unplanned based on SERVICE_NO only.
For eg. Let a PO contains one service line with SERVICE_NO value 1008505.
            If SES input file contains 2 service entries with SERVICE_NO value 1008505.
            While creating SES, the BAPI should treat first entry as 'planned' and second line as 'unplanned'.
            But while running the program, both lines are created as 'Planned' only, since SERVICE_NO value 1008505 exists in the PO.
I need to set the service line planned/unplanned through my prgram, overriding the automatic setting up of BAPI_ENTRYSHEET_CREATE.
Hope this clarifies my requirement.
Grateful if somebody cam provide a solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Manju

Do NOT USE BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDATA, that FM is obsolete!
Use BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT1 .
To build a reference to your contract you have to supply ORDER_HEADER_IN.
Here´s a sample:
MOVE:
gs_vbak-vbeln TO ls_bapisdhd1-refobjkey,
gs_vbak-vbeln TO ls_bapisdhd1-ref_doc,
gs_vbak-vbtyp TO ls_bapisdhd1-refdoc_cat,
gs_vbak-auart TO ls_bapisdhd1-refdoctype.
also gothrouh the links
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/snippets/abap%2b-%2bsimple%2bprogram%2bto%2bcreate%2bsales%2border%2busing%2bbapi

Do you value customer service in a cell phone company?

I am a military member currently living in Arlington, VA. On August 10, 2013, I visited the Verizon Wireless at Fashion Centre store at the Pentagon City Mall (1100 S Hayes St., Ste 3032, Arlington, VA 22202). I visited the store because my cell phone, Droid RAZR, was displaying a blank screen when powered on, rendering it impossible for me to utilize the phone. The phone was a refurbished model because the original purchased in September of 2012 failed in December 2012. The refurbished phone had issues from the get-go, but with my military travel and irregular work hours, getting to the store during a time when it was both open and my phone was acting up, was extremely challenging.
Upon entering the store (Verizon Wireless at Fashion Centre) on the afternoon of August 10, 2013, I was greeted by the manager, Ms. L. After explaining my situation with the phone to Ms. L, she indicated that there was nothing she could do because she believed that the damage was my fault. I reminded her that it was a refurbished phone, meaning it was not new and had been repaired previously. After arguing with me in an inappropriately loud tone and repeatedly calling me a “liar” for stating that my phone had been acting up for a significant amount of time, Ms. L stated that she would upgrade me a year early to a new phone, but that I couldn’t have an Apple model phone. She indicated that new phones would be coming out the following week and that I might want to wait to make my choice until I saw them. Ms. L provided me with her personal cell phone number in case I had questions. I thanked her immensely for agreeing to assist me and agreed to return to the store early in the next week to make my selection.
I called Ms. L on Monday August 12, 2013 to inquire about whether or not the new phones had come in yet. She stated that they had not. Wednesday August 14, 2013, I visited the store to make my selection because my phone had stopped working entirely and I could not wait any longer. When I arrived at the store, Ms. L refused to come out from the back room. Her employees stated that she was out at lunch. I worked with one employee, Paula, to find a phone that would work for me, though I was extremely disappointed that I was not allowed to get the iPhone. We finally settled on the Galaxy SIII.
When I went to purchase my new phone, Paula set me up with another employee, Dionne, for check out. Dionne lacked any sort of professionalism. She had multiple facial piercings and was dressed in a totally inappropriate manner for her job. During our interaction, she got up and wandered around to talk to other people on several occasions without saying a word to me. I asked her to move all of my pictures and contacts from my old phone to my new phone because I was unclear how to do that myself. She told me that she had done so. I also asked her to remove everything from my old phone at the end of the process so as to make sure all of my personal information was cleared off. To this day, I am not confident Dionne even heard half of what I had asked her to do because she was getting up so frequently. After making an approximately $150 purchase (phone, case, and charger), I thanked Dionne and Ms. L, who had finally emerged from the back room, and departed the store.
When I arrived home that evening, I found that I was missing approximately half of my contacts and over 150 of my pictures. Dionne had neglected to transfer everything the right away. I called Ms. L on the personnel number she had provided me and explained that I was distraught over the loss of my pictures and asked her how that could have happened. (I lost numerous pictures from my military deployments, travel, and of my friends that I will never be able to get back). I also lost numerous contact numbers that I will never be able to get back. Ms. L apologized on behalf of her employee, Dionne, and stated that my pictures must not have been backed up to the SD card when the transfer occurred. I asked her why Dionne had not checked on that because not all clients are technically savvy enough to know how to do that. Ms. L again apologized for Dionne’s neglect and incompetence, stating that she planned to “write her up.” Ms. L asked me to call her back the following day so that she could see if anything could be done about retrieving my pictures.
On Thursday August 15, I called Ms. L back as she had requested around approximately 5:00PM. Instead of answering the phone herself, she immediately placed Dionne on the phone. Dionne began rambling about how it was not her fault that my pictures were missing and that I should have known how to use my phone well enough to understand how an SD card worked. When I attempted to interject, she said “Hold on,” set the phone down, and placed me on hold for approximately 3 minutes. Ms. L then picked up the phone and began shouting at me. She stated, “What more do you want from me?...I already got you a new phone, which I should not have done…You are ungrateful…” I stated that I was not seeking anything further, other than I could not understand how Ms. L would let an employee act so inappropriately (particularly in reference to Dionne and how she had gotten up multiple times while I was trying to purchase my phone). I told her that I held Dionne totally responsible for the loss of my pictures and contacts because she did not take the time to ensure my pictures and contacts were backed up and she left the desk to talk to other people frequently during my purchase. Ms. L then stated, “Well, when other customers enter the store, we have to greet them.” I stated that I understood that, but that I was making a significant purchase and believe that I warranted attention as well. To that, Ms. L stated, “Well it’s not like you were buying a $600 phone outright, so that didn’t exactly make you my best customer.” When I attempted to respond to her, Ms. L stated, “You were rude and I put up with your **** the first time you were in the store with your old phone, but I’m not going to put up with you now. I hope sincerely that your phone works, so that I never have to see you again.” I told her I hoped my phone worked as well and said goodbye.
Immediately after my final interaction with Ms. L on August 15, 2013, I called the Verizon customer service line where I spoke with Anthony. Anthony and I talked at length about my experience and the sheer unprofessionalism displayed by the employees of the store (demeanor, language, and appearance). He helped me to file an official report against the store. I spent approximately an hour on the phone with Anthony. At the end of our conversation, Anthony and I set up a 3:30 PM (EST) follow-up phone call for Monday August 19, 2013 to follow-up on the situation. It is now Thursday August 22, 2013, and I have yet to receive a follow-up call from Anthony or anyone at Verizon.
I am disgusted by the all-around unprofessionalism, inappropriate language and tone displayed by the employees of the Verizon Wireless at Fashion Centre store, and the lack of care displayed for the customer by Verizon on the whole. My family and I have been customers of Verizon for years. As a military member, I have been taught that ethics, professionalism and respect are of the utmost value. Not only were none of those values displayed in a positive way during my recent interactions with Verizon, but I am now literally afraid to enter the Verizon Wireless at Fashion Centre store for fear of another negative encounter with Ms. L (the manager) or Dionne. I am truly disturbed that even after making a report like this to Verizon, I have received no follow-up as was promised. I have been treated poorly, demeaned, degraded, and made to feel valueless to a company that my family and I have loyally supported for many years. To add insult to injury, I didn’t even get the phone I actually wanted! At this point, I can say with certainty that I will be shopping around for another cell phone provider in the future and recommending to my family members and friends that they do the same.
<< Post edited to remove full name, profanity, and to comply with Verizon Wireless Terms of Service >>
Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

I tried for 30 minutes to get to billing and all I could get was a computer that wanted money, no option for service rep. I had to change the date on one of my payments and ever since I have been getting texts saying I missed a payment and I had to call them. After I went through the aboved mentioned I finally called the new business line and was able to get transfered to billing. The lady was rude and didn't want to wait on my responses. She said I had schechuled it for the 1st and that why I was getting these texts , I was holding the paper, gave her the conformation number and told her it was for the seventh, all of a sudden the phone starting breaking up. I never had problems like this till my idenity was stolen and some guys got into my checking account, we caught it early and was able to close the account and open another. I had verizon on auto bill in the account and that was the only one I forgot put in the new info. Of course it was returned as closed. As soon as I saw this I checked the profile and changed it. They charged me the fee ( of course) and I called them to explain why this happened and apologized. Ever since then I have been treated like I'm a bum and that I don't pay my bill. I have been with them since 2000 and I'm thinking of changing it in September when the contract is up.

Creating Service Entry Sheet without using Service Master/Service lines

We are invoking the BAPI_EntrySheet_Create to create the service entry sheet. We are currently facing this issue...
1) For assigned PO's, we are getting the PO item and Account assignment information from BAPI_PO_GetDetail. We are using these values to populate the parameters/tables to invoke BAPI_EntrySheet_Create. For population the Entrysheetservices table, we are not using information from Service Master/Service lines but use the information we get from an external system to populate the Service lines(ESLL). We do not provide a Package No/Service information when invoking the BAPI but populate the service lines with short text, quantity, Gross price etc without service information like package no, outline indicator etc. The BAPI creates a service enty sheet successfully(this is without the SES Acceptance indicator not being set) but when we lookup the SES# from ML81n transaction the ESLL details lines are not displayed.
When displaying the SES using transaction ML81N, the header information is displayed correctly but the lines are not displayed. The Header information is correctly populated in ESSR table and detail is also populated in ESLL table. I think the cross reference information is correctly set in ESLH table to pull up the detail when ML81N as it is missing the package/sub pack information.
Your expert advise in resolving this issue is very much appreciate. Please advise.

Hi,
Creating Service entry sheet using bapi BAPI_ENTRYSHEET_CREATE
For creating service entry sheet follow below link and it helps to you.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/CreatingServiceEntrySheetusing+BAPI
Regards,
Sekhar

PR creation using BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE, Service lines query

Hi,
I am trying to create the PR for service agreements and i'm able to create the same.
My first query is how to populate the data in LIMIT tab(Overall Limit & Expected value) for each line item of PR. I am using BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE but its not populating the values in LIMIT tab.
2nd Query: BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE is not checking the validity of the Requisitioner ID and even if the ID is not valis it is creating the PR. Does this BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE restrict this? I guess it does not. I have created so many PR with invalid ID's while testing and it seems this bapi doesn't care about requisitioner id at all. Please advice some workaround.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks
Randhir

Solved.

Issue with service line purchase orders.

Hi Experts,
    We have recently upgraded to following pack levels -
System                                 Pack level
ECC 6.0          17, EHP4 Stack 7
SRM 5.0          17
There is an issue around purchase order change. If an existing PO is edited and a new line is added to the PO it appears fine in SRM system. But on replicating to backend, we see that the newly added line has been duplicated i.e. appears twice thereby reflecting incorrect value.
This is happening for Service line items. Has anyone had similar issue at their end ? I tried to search SAP Notes but found nothing relevant to our issue.
Any pointers / suggestions would be much appreciated.
Thanks
RB

Hi
Before going to SAP, Check the data being passed to ECC from SRM. Activate the BAPI_PO_CREATE1 for creating data in test directory instead of posting the documnet. then check the data in BAPI Segments, if the data is proper there then there is some problem in ECC 6 ehp 4 which need to be highlighted to SAP, otherwise its a problem in sending the data from SRM to ECC.
OSS Note for creating test data is - Note 539978 - Automatic generation of BAPI test data directory
Regards
Virender Singh

Expected Value in Service PO

Hi,
I am trying to create a service PO, i have given service master number in the services tab and in limits tab i checked No limits check box. After checking the no limits check box, expected value filed has become mandatory. I want that field as optional. Where is the control?
Note: In document type field selection there is no control.
Regards,
Prabu
Edited by: prabu krishnasamy on Nov 6, 2009 6:17 PM

Hi,
Please fill into the services tab the service line with the service master first, hit enter, and only afterward mark the "no limit" field (ESUH-SUMNOLIM). In this case you will not get the error message SE999.
If you mark the "no limit" field first on the limit tab and only afterwards try to add the service line, you will get SE999. Please read note 440601.
Regards,
Edit

Idoc successfully posted without deleting service line

Dear Team,
I am trying to delete the service line item for multiple service lines throguh Idoc (FM : BAPI_PO_CHANGE) its bit of surprising thata my IDOC is getting posted without any errors but nothing is changing ,however the value is getting changed for single line but not able to delete the service line .
I can able to delete the main line item but not the service line item .Anyone can quickly help on this i am trying since last two days but nothing worked for me .
Also kindly confirm me if is there any SAP note i need to check
Thanks for your support ..
Regards
Kiran Kumar
Please find Below Idoc passing values :
Header -
PO_NUMBER      C00014
DOC_TYPE      CCTC
VENDOR      0000010001
PURCH_ORG      D001
PUR_GROUP      018
CURRENCY      EUR
Header X
PO_NUMBER      X
DOC_TYPE      X
PURCH_ORG      X
PUR_GROUP      X
CURRENCY      X
Item
PO_ITEM      00010
SHORT_TEXT      ITEM 10 CHANGE
PLANT      D001
MATL_GROUP      10341
ITEM_CAT      9
ACCTASSCAT      T
PCKG_NO      0000000035
SRV_BASED_IV      X
Item X
PO_ITEM 00010
PO_ITEMX      X
SHORT_TEXT      X
PLANT      X
MATL_GROUP      X
ITEM_CAT      X
ACCTASSCAT      X
PCKG_NO      X
SRV_BASED_IV      X
PO Account :
PO_ITEM      00010
SERIAL_NO      01
WBS_ELEMENT      D-000015-01-001
RES_DOC      0050000014
RES_ITEM      001
Po Account X :
PO_ITEM      00010
SERIAL_NO      01
PO_ITEMX      X
SERIAL_NOX      X
WBS_ELEMENT      X
RES_DOC      X
RES_ITEM      X
Service line :
PCKG_NO      0000000035
LINE_NO      0000000001
EXT_LINE      0000000010
OUTL_IND      X
SUBPCKG_NO      0000000050
linkage Service line1 :
PCKG_NO      0000000050
LINE_NO      0000000002
EXT_LINE      0000000010
QUANTITY      5.00
BASE_UOM      D
PRICE_UNIT      1
GR_PRICE      5.00
SHORT_TEXT      TEST CHANGE
MATL_GROUP      10341
NET_VALUE      25.00
linkage Service line 2:
PCKG_NO      0000000050
LINE_NO      0000000003
EXT_LINE      0000000020
QUANTITY      5.00
BASE_UOM      D
PRICE_UNIT      1
GR_PRICE      6.00
SHORT_TEXT      TEST CHANGE
MATL_GROUP      10341
NET_VALUE      30.00
Account assignment dist. service line1 :
PCKG_NO      0000000050
LINE_NO      0000000002
SERNO_LINE      01
PERCENTAGE      100.00
SERIAL_NO      01
QUANTITY      5
NET_VALUE      25.00
Account assignment dist. service line2 :
PCKG_NO      0000000050
LINE_NO      0000000003
SERNO_LINE      01
PERCENTAGE      100.00
SERIAL_NO      01
QUANTITY      5
NET_VALUE      30.00
PO results after IDoc posted : Purchase order Item changes screen below
Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X BONGAK 01.05.2015 11:20:40 3168 WE19
Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X BONGAK 01.05.2015 11:23:12 3169 WE19
Item Purchasing Document Item Change Date Changed 01.05.2015 30.04.2015 BONGAK 01.05.2015 11:20:40 3168 WE19
Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X BONGAK 30.04.2015 16:41:02 3154 WE19
Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X BONGAK 30.04.2015 16:43:09 3156 WE19
Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X BONGAK 30.04.2015 16:49:50 3157 WE19
Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X BONGAK 30.04.2015 17:00:19 3159 WE19
Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X BONGAK 30.04.2015 17:02:33 3160 WE19
Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X BONGAK 30.04.2015 17:37:31 3165 WE19
Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X BONGAK 30.04.2015 17:40:29 3166 WE19
Item Purchasing Document Item Change Date Changed 30.04.2015 13.04.2015 BONGAK 30.04.2015 16:41:02 3154 WE19
Item Short Text Changed ITEM 10 CHANGE FS-FND-223 - Fees BONGAK 30.04.2015 16:41:02 3154 WE19

Hi Kiran,
If you are using message type ORDERS then check the qualifier and action which you have used in segments E1EDK01 E1EDK14 also check all your service segments also.
Rgds,
Nayeem.

Service Line Items

Hi Gurus,
I have a situation.
we use service line items using the unplanned service function within SAP. On PO line items, we assign an overall limit and expected value.
Ok, now a bit of a background regarding one of the system changes we made in SAP. About 2 years ago, we noticed that some users were changing the PO price after the GR was complete. This obviously causes issues with GR postings, so we changed the logic to disallow price changes after a GR has been completed.
The logic we applied around price changes has worked fine, with one exception--Service line items using the unplanned services function.   For example, if we create a PO with an overall value of $3,000, and only use $500 of that $3000, we want to be able to adjust the value to show what was actually done. In other words, we would like to be able to change the PO value down to $500, closing out any open value on the PO. With the price change logic, the system will not allow us to change the price because a GR/Service entry sheet has already been completed.
So here is what my business is asking for
1.     The logic around price changes to be modified when it comes to services. would like the ability to modify the overall limit and expected value, but only be able to modify it to a point where it is equal to, or greater than the actual value. And should not be able to drop the overall limit and expected value to anything below the actual value.
Is there a way to do this.
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Srikanth

SInce you are working with enhancement check with ABAPer for logic and modify the program for Service PO's

How we can Print a field Value in last line of the layout

Hello:
I am doing Check printing report ... Accroding to that I am facing a problem to print a Field value in last line of the layout....Anyone Can help to this please.....

Hello,
Take a look to the example provided in the note :
Note.253881.1 How to Create a Report With a Frame Only on the Last Page at a Fixed Position
Regards

ML81N check a value of service line

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for