Moving object instead references

I want to copy an object into a matrix, and then equal that object to zero. But it something goes wrong, I suspect this is because only a reference is copied into the matrix, and not the object itself. And when I remove the object, the reference is obsolete. Is there a way to avoid this? I tried implenting the Cloneable interface in the object, and then putting a clone in the matrix, but it still doesn't work. Thanks

Your conception seems like C program. Be careful to do Object programmation.
In Java, remember that you have only references (equivalent to pointers in C).
In java you manipulate only the references through the variables.
An object is never set to null, only the variables which contains references to this object. The object is still here but not reachable.
Look this code :
MyObject var1 = new MyObject();
MyObject var2 = var1;
var1 = null;
Now let see how the program works :
new MyObject() create an instance of the class MyObject and store it at the adress 2000 (for example).
MyObject var1 = new MyObject();
In the created variable var1, the adress of the newly created object will be stored. var1 <-- 2000
MyObject var2 = var1;
We create a new variable var2 in which we store the value of the variable var1 i.e. : 2000 : var2 <-- 2000
var1 = null;
In the variable var1 the value is set to null : var1 <-- null.
At this moment the variable var1 contains no reference (null) and var2 still contains 2000 the adress of the object in memory.
I hope it is clearer for you,
Denis

Similar Messages

  • Trouble selecting and moving objects near text in Adobe Illustrator? Try this.

    It's been 4 years since I left Corel DRAW for Adobe Illustrator. One thing I could never get used to is the crazy way text has an impenetrable invisible sheet over it making it hard to select objects near or behind it.
    With Corel DRAW I was used to be able to select text by simply clicking on the visible area of the text. Selecting stuff behind the text by clicking between letters or right next to a decender was never a problem. But Illustrator is a different story.
    Tonight I finally found a way to make selecting text in Illustrator behave more like Corel DRAW.
    I wrote it up here: http://www.johnstanowski.com/blog/trouble-selecting-and-moving-objects-near-text-in-adobe- illustrator-try-this/
    Just thought I'd share! 

    It's not spam, but thanks for assuming.
    I was up really late writing that blog post. Posting a link was the quickest way to share and be able to go to bed.
    Plus it's rather lengthy. I thought that would be rude to use an Adobe forum for my articles.
    If you saw my blog you will have seen there's not much going on there at all, and no calls to action to hire me. I don't have anything to gain by getting traffic.
    And, yeah, layers work for selecting, but that slows you down. Who would want to look away from their work to find and select a layer when they're trying to tweak positions of objects? Layers suck for selecting quickly.
    And there must be something wrong with me but I find using Type Object Selection by Path Only by itself hard to use. I'd really just like to click on the text itself rather than an invisible hairline you have to probe to find.
    Here's the post. I hope people who had trouble like me find it helpful.
    Do you have trouble selecting objects near Point Type in Adobe Illustrator? You’ve been there. You want to select an object. Problem is, it’s really close to piece of Point Type. All too often we try to select objects that wind up being unreachable because they lie too close to a piece of Point Type, which we wind up selecting instead. Luckily, after years of angst, I discovered a solution.
    Point Type in Adobe Illustrator is funny. There’s this invisible “shield” around it. This shield is much larger (at least it seems that way) than the text itself. It prevents you from selecting objects behind text by clicking between letter and words. This shield is particularly meddlesome with lowercase letters and decenders because we think surely we can click on that blue box (or whatever) because it seems far enough away from that Point Type. But the lowercase “g” in the Point Type’s territory.
    Okay, now that we know we’re talking about the same thing, let’s move on to the solutions.
    Step 1. Check ‘Type Object Selection by Path Only’ in Preferences
    You’ll find this option in Preferences/Type. Click it and that nasty text shield goes away. But there’s a price to pay. With this option activated, the only way you can select your text is by clicking on the text path, a super, tiny, thin baseline thingy under all the letters, but above decenders. It’s really hard to grab. To do it right you need to slowly approach the text path with your cursor. When you’re right over it, Illustrator will let you know by adding a small black square to your cursor. Now, you can click, hold and move your text. But this workflow can really slow you down and break your rhythm, maybe even more so with it turned off.
    Step 2. Add the ‘Outline Object’ Effect
    Select your Point Type and, from under the Effects Menu/Path/, select Outline Object. This effect does something really sweet to text in Illustrator: it lets your Point Type objects be treated as if their were converted to Outlines. You can still edit the text, but as far as selecting it, Illustrator now considers it outlines and shapes instead of a text object. Basically, it now considers the Path of the text to be the text itself! Now, since we’ve already checked ‘Type Object Selection by Path Only’ we can now click on the text to select it. Just the text. Not the baseline, not the wacky invisible shield surrounding it.
    And now… you can select things behind the text by clicking between words and letters. And the ONLY way to select Point Type is to click on the visible parts of the text itself! Problem solved.
    Potential Problem:
    Too much of a good thing could be a bad thing. Let’s say you have some Point Type set in a very light face and it’s pretty small or you’re zoomed way out. Selecting that text could be a problem since you have to actually click on the text itself. Actually it isn’t that hard, it may just require an extra click to grab it. If you have a set of smaller, light-faced bits of text, you can elect to just not apply the Outline Object effect to these. They’ll get their ‘shield’ back and be easier to click on. And since they’re so small, they don’t pose a problem with selecting things behind them anyway.
    Applying this technique to your old files
    Now that you’ve learned this awesome new way to work around type in Illustrator, you may be anxious to open yesterday’s project and get back to work. But you may be not be looking forward to applying the Outline Object effect to each and every piece of type. For this you can use Illustrator’s “Select Same” feature. Select one piece of text. Then from the Select Menu click on Object/Text Objects. Now ALL of your text objects will be selected, and you can apply the Outline Object effect to all of them at once!
    That’s it. If you build ads or work with a lot of type in Illustrator, you’re about to be able to work a lot faster… and happier.

  • How hard is it to morph a moving object? (aka Superman?)

    Hi everyone,
    This is one of my first posts, and I want to thank you all for contributing great posts here. I am a newbie to Shake, so I have a feeling the answer will be "Read The Manual!" But here goes...
    I want to know how difficult it will be to morph a moving object. For example, my 2 1/2 year old son loves Superman, I mean loves Superman, toys, pajamas, movies, cant get enough. So I just finished shooting a very amateur mission impossible type short film with him, and he loved doing that so much that I thought I would go ahead and try this again with him. Instead this time, I will have him dress like Clark Kent and run and change into Superman, with flying scenes and the whole bit. So my question is this, how difficult would it be to morph him running, opening the shirt, and changing into a running Superman? Yes I will read the manual, but I first wanted some serious opinions if my attempts will be valid and worth while. I do not have a green screen for the flying scenes yet, but have searched other forums and have scene that taping of noeon greem posterboard to work equally as well for that. As for the morphing, I planned on having my Sony HDV-HC1 camera on a tripod, and just retaking him running with the Kent outfit, and then with the Superman outfit, and morphing the object from that point, hoping to start and stop in the same manner on each take.
    I realize this isnt Hollywood, but its something that I want to look back on, no matter how amateur it is, and just say that I felt proud doing that for both him and me. Thanks for the input everyone and God Bless!
    Hidalgo

    Thnak you for the reply. I watched the tutorial and it is very ineteresting. Although the morphing is performed with 2 pictures, I believe I would hjust have to morph two frames together, however my fear is that it will be so quick that the viewer will not have the opportunity to see the change take place. Am I correct in saying that I would have to morph several frames in order to see a less drastic effect, and if so, how is that done? Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
    (The effect I am thinking of is in Superman II, when Kent runs down an alley and morphs into Superman, gradual but very cool and effective.)
    Thanks again and God Bless.
    Hidalgo

  • Moving object programming

    Hi everybody. I am newbie in java 3D/2D programming. I am going to make a city road map(still confused whether it would be 2D or 3D).It should not be an applet.
    Let me tell you briefly. It will be a city road map where bus and taxi will be moving objects. Those will run on the road(will not cross the road boundary).
    Now would anyone please tell me how i will start? from where will i start? What i need to know to make it? What API do i need to use?
    Lots of questions and unknown are there :-)
    Please help me.
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks for your reply.
    Actually now at the primary stage i am not thinking about 3D buses. No problem with the flat buses.
    But two major conditions are the buses will move from one stopage to another without crossing the road boundary (roads may be curve).And buses will not overlap one another.
    Would you please send me some sample code? Or any reference ?
    Thank you again.

  • Passing objects by reference in PL/SQL

    Hi,
    I have come across an unexpected problem using object types in PL/SQL that is causing me some grief. I'm from a Java background and am relatively new to Oracle Objects but what I'm trying to do is fairly trivial, I think. The code below illustrates the problem.
    --- cut here ---
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE test_obj_t AS OBJECT
    num INTEGER,
    CONSTRUCTOR FUNCTION test_obj_t RETURN SELF AS RESULT
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE BODY test_obj_t IS
    CONSTRUCTOR FUNCTION test_obj_t RETURN SELF AS RESULT IS
    BEGIN
    num := 0;
    RETURN;
    END;
    END;
    CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE test_obj_ref AS
    PROCEDURE init(o IN test_obj_t);
    PROCEDURE inc;
    FUNCTION get_num RETURN INTEGER;
    END;
    CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY test_obj_ref IS
    obj test_obj_t;
    PROCEDURE init(o IN test_obj_t) IS
    BEGIN
    obj := o;
    END;
    PROCEDURE inc IS
    BEGIN
    obj.num := obj.num + 1;
    END;
    FUNCTION get_num RETURN INTEGER IS
    BEGIN
    RETURN obj.num;
    END;
    END;
    --- cut here ---
    The object type test_obj_t holds a integer and the test_obj_ref package holds a 'reference' to an instance of the object.
    To test the above code I run this PL/SQL block:
    declare
    obj test_obj_t;
    begin
    obj := test_obj_t;
    test_obj_ref.init(obj);
    dbms_output.put_line('obj.num='||obj.num);
    dbms_output.put_line('test_obj_ref.get_num='||test_obj_ref.get_num);
    test_obj_ref.inc;
    dbms_output.put_line('obj.num='||obj.num);
    dbms_output.put_line('test_obj_ref.get_num='||test_obj_ref.get_num);
    test_obj_ref.inc;
    dbms_output.put_line('obj.num='||obj.num);
    dbms_output.put_line('test_obj_ref.get_num='||test_obj_ref.get_num);
    end;
    giving the output:
    obj.num=0
    test_obj_ref.get_num=0
    obj.num=0
    test_obj_ref.get_num=1
    obj.num=0
    test_obj_ref.get_num=2
    It appears that the object held by the test_obj_ref package is being incremented as expected, but I would have expected the object declared in the PL/SQL block to be pointing to the same object and so should report the same incremented values.
    I suspect that the object is copied in the call to test_obj_ref.init() so I end up with two object instances, one that is held by the test_obj_ref package and one in the anonymous block. Although, I thought that all IN parameters in PL/SQL are passed by reference and not copied!
    Am I right?
    Is passing objects by reference possible in PL/SQL, if so how?
    I'm using Oracle 10.2.0.3.
    Cheers,
    Andy.

    the object being passed to the test_obj_ref.init+ procedure is passed by reference; however, when you assign it to your package variable obj it is being copied to a new instance. you can pass object instances as parameters to procedures using the +IN OUT [NOCOPY]+ *calling mode, in which case modifications to the attributes of the passed object will be reflected in the calling scope's instance variable.
    oracle's only other notion of an object reference is the +"REF &lt;object-type&gt;"+ datatype, which holds a reference to an object instance stored in an object table or constructed by an object view.
    hope this helps...
    gerard

  • Interlace problems with moving objects using iDVD

    I had an MP4 file (created by a 3rd party) from a Hi-8 analog tape which has some interlace artifacts on moving images (left image of boy) but not too bad. When the MP4 files was imported into iMovie 11 the interlace artifacts smoothed somewhat - that was OK (right image of boy). The camera was still and the boy was moving.  Vertical lines on stationary objects are OK in all images. These are screen captures from the Mac of the mp4 played through quicktime and the same file imported into iMovie 11 and played.  I paused both to take the screen capture.
    The completed project in iMovie 11 looked OK when previewed prior to rendering. These are 20 year old videos so my expections were being met.   I rendered the project with iDVD to the hard drive first and then to a DVD with the same poor imaging result on the moving object.  I am using a new Macbook Pro I bought in early January which came with iMovie 11 and iDVD  Ver 7.1.2 (1158). Running Mac OS X 10.7.3  Macbook Pro  2.3 Ghz Corei7   8GB 1333 Mhz DDR3.
    I couldn't screen capture from the MAC DVD player screen to illustrate the poor result (got a checkerboard screen) so I took a photo of the screen and imported that (below).  The moving boy on the left is from an  iMovie 11 screen capture, the image on the right is the moving boy from the rendered DVD I paused on the Mac (and took a pic of).
    Below a close up of the poorly rendered moving boy viewed on the resultant DVD.  This translates into a horrible rendition of any quick moving object.  It happens with any moving image - i.e. a pan across a room with straight vertical lines like edges of a wall will show as serrated and poorly rendered edge. I used a trial version of the Daniusoft DVD creator with the same result!  I am at a loss on how to resolve this issue.  Any thoughts out there??
    I had previously used Pinnacle Studios on my old XP PC which worked great on other tape's Mpeg files and created great DVD's (never had an interlace problem) ... until my computer died .....  so I figured Apple and associated software should be at least equal if not a superior product.   Now I'm not too sure!

    I had an MP4 file (created by a 3rd party) from a Hi-8 analog tape which has some interlace artifacts on moving images (left image of boy) but not too bad. When the MP4 files was imported into iMovie 11 the interlace artifacts smoothed somewhat - that was OK (right image of boy). The camera was still and the boy was moving.  Vertical lines on stationary objects are OK in all images. These are screen captures from the Mac of the mp4 played through quicktime and the same file imported into iMovie 11 and played.  I paused both to take the screen capture.
    The completed project in iMovie 11 looked OK when previewed prior to rendering. These are 20 year old videos so my expections were being met.   I rendered the project with iDVD to the hard drive first and then to a DVD with the same poor imaging result on the moving object.  I am using a new Macbook Pro I bought in early January which came with iMovie 11 and iDVD  Ver 7.1.2 (1158). Running Mac OS X 10.7.3  Macbook Pro  2.3 Ghz Corei7   8GB 1333 Mhz DDR3.
    I couldn't screen capture from the MAC DVD player screen to illustrate the poor result (got a checkerboard screen) so I took a photo of the screen and imported that (below).  The moving boy on the left is from an  iMovie 11 screen capture, the image on the right is the moving boy from the rendered DVD I paused on the Mac (and took a pic of).
    Below a close up of the poorly rendered moving boy viewed on the resultant DVD.  This translates into a horrible rendition of any quick moving object.  It happens with any moving image - i.e. a pan across a room with straight vertical lines like edges of a wall will show as serrated and poorly rendered edge. I used a trial version of the Daniusoft DVD creator with the same result!  I am at a loss on how to resolve this issue.  Any thoughts out there??
    I had previously used Pinnacle Studios on my old XP PC which worked great on other tape's Mpeg files and created great DVD's (never had an interlace problem) ... until my computer died .....  so I figured Apple and associated software should be at least equal if not a superior product.   Now I'm not too sure!

  • My mouse scrolls shows each line moving up instead of moving one line at a time annoying

    Since downloading firefox 3.6 when I scroll down a page it shows each line moving up instead of just moving one line up its very annoying

    It could be that there is not enough memory in the printer or the print server to hold the entire document while printing. The printer gets Postscript files, which are larger than the original document. Also, if you are doing multiple copies, if you collate the pages, that takes more memory than printing each page multiple times.

  • Using domain object instead of generated ones?

    I'm using NetBeans, and I'm curious if there's a way that we can use our domain objects with the web service calls rather than the empty stubs generated by wsgen?
    wsgen creates the skeletal client classes, as well as an ObjectFactory that returns instances of those classes. I imagine I could modify ObjectFactory to return our domain objects instead, but then we'd be breaking with wsgen.
    Is there a better solution to this?
    Thanx!

    You can associate a Virtual Host to the loopback IP address 127.0.0.1 read about Virtual Hosts here: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/virtual-hosting-howto.html
    But with the above configuration alone you can access your app via http://somedomainname.com only on your local machine, no one else on the internet will see it.

  • How do I pull up the left control panel that allows you to move from text to moving objects on page?

    How do I pull up the left control panel that allows you to move from text to moving objects on page?

    Do you mean this one:
    If so, go to the Window menu and make sure that Tools is checked.

  • Positioning moving objects

    I'm getting ready to make a 2d game and wasn't sure how to draw moving objects on the screen. I've played around in the past and always had a fixed sized window and basically moved objects around on a pixel grid. I want to have a resizeable window but keep the relative size and movements of objects the same. How is this usually done? Should I just render it to the largest possible window size and then transform it to the appropriate size? Thanks in advance!

    jgould wrote:
    I'm getting ready to make a 2d game and wasn't sure how to draw moving objects on the screen. I've played around in the past and always had a fixed sized window and basically moved objects around on a pixel grid. I want to have a resizeable window but keep the relative size and movements of objects the same. How is this usually done? Should I just render it to the largest possible window size and then transform it to the appropriate size? Thanks in advance!Not sure what that means. Basically you have a couple options:
    1- Store locations by ratios, not exact coordinates. So if you want a GameObject's location to be in the direct middle of the screen, its position would be (.5, .5). Then when you go to draw that GameObject, you have to convert that position to screen coordinates. You do this simply by multiplying the ratio-coordinates by the game window's width or height.
    2- Store locations by some model coordinates. This is similar to the first method, but requires some extra translation. You would store the GameObject's location via coordinates such as (50, 50), but you would also have to keep track of how large your game window model was (for simplicity's sake, let's say it is 200 by 100):
    drawPoint( (gameObject.getX() / 200) * gamePanel.getWidth(), (gameObject.getY() / 100) * gamePanel.getHeight() );Does that make any more sense?
    Edit- I should say that there probably are a ton of other ways to do it, these are just the ways that most easily fit into my head. It's all just algebra though.
    Edited by: kevinaworkman on Nov 13, 2009 2:54 PM

  • How do you filter out moving objects in a movie?

    Hello!
    I'v searched the internet for solutions to this but I cann't find any.
    Im prittie new and I need to make a house on fire while two guys (one is me)
    will be walking away from it, towards the camera.
    I want to filter out these two guys and only apply fire and flames to the house itself!
    To do this I used Time Diffrence and tried to isolate the guy using Fast Blur and Luma Key
    but Im prittie lost.. Nothing works and I really need guidence
    Do you know a trick to use?
    I cant do greenscreening as the green background would cost a fortune..
    But isn't there anyway to filter out moving objects?

    I'm not sure that you totally get the process. This kind of shot requires at least 3 elements or plates. These three plates become three layers in After Effects. The bottom layer would be the Background Plate which is a shot of the house without any actors in the shot. The next plate would be the Effect Plate or Fire Plate which could be any shot you can get or generate through plug-ins of flames. The top layer would be your Foreground Plate or your two actors.
    Now that you know what you need you can plan your shoot. The background plate is easy. Just set the camera on a tripod and lock it off. NO zooming. No panning, No change of focus. The foreground plate is also easy. You don't have to green screen the entire set, all you need to do is to put a green screen behind your actors. I do this kind of thing all the time using a 6' X 6' (sometimes smaller) green screen (or blue or red or purple) made of fabric and stretched over a frame that I made from 1/2" EMT electrical conduit and 4 90º elbow connectors for less than $20 at Home Depot or Lowes. You get a couple of assistants to walk behind your actors holding the green screen behind them. If you need to include their feet they can be easily rotoscoped out later and you can garbage matte everything else. If it's impossible to green screen the shot then you are stuck with roto, but that's much easier in CS5 using the roto brush. If you use your show with the actors as the background plate roto is even easier because you can hide a multitude of sins by simply feathering the roto and letting the fire light wrap around the actors a bit.
    The fire plate can be purchased footage, or you could shoot a real fire against a black background, or you could create the flames using AE or even a 3D app like Blender (free) or a bunch of other apps.
    Making the shot look real requires a few tricks once you have your clean plates. Fire creates light so you've got to add lighting effects to the background plate to sell the fire. You've also got to wrap light around your actors. Look for tutorials on light wrap for this. You can really help sell the effect if you place some flickering light sources behind and to the side of your actors when you shoot the foreground (actors) plate.
    Once you get a handle on these techniques it's fairly easy to make the transition to pulling of this kind of a shot with a hand held camera (now you have to learn motion tracking). On a project I recently completed we had to put a fire in a prop fireplace while actors moved around bringing milk and cookies for Santa. It was all roto and the fire was shot at night with nothing more than a black cloth (Duvetyne) behind the fireplace grate. The final composite was 10 layers and was so totally believable that no one questions the shot.
    The layers were from top to bottom, reflection in grandmas glasses, light wrap, actors (roto of original background plate), fire flicker layer, color mask layer (more orange around fire, fire glow layer, fire layer in Add mode, second fire layer in screen mode, third fire layer Luma keyed, and finally the original plate which contained all the actors, carefully lit with flickering firelight simulated by dangling a stick with fabric cut into 1/2 inch wide strips about one foot long in front of a orange gelled light behind and to the right of  the actors.
    If I get a chance I'll post a screenshot.
    Here you go:
    Light Wrap:
    The Movie
    Part of the original render before color grading.
    Enjoy

  • Does Java pass objects by Reference

    The following is my code:
    public static boolean isValid(String tester, Integer intHours, Integer intMinutes)
              int dotPosition = tester.indexOf('.');
              String hours = tester.substring(0, dotPosition);
              String minutes = tester.substring(dotPosition +1, tester.length());
              try {
                        intHours = Integer.valueOf(hours);
                        intMinutes = Integer.valueOf(minutes);
         } catch (NumberFormatException nfe) {
         return false;
         return true;
    What Iam trying to do is pass the Integer Objects by reference so that they retain their values outside of the scope of the function. My teacher told me that objects are passed by reference in Java but (even though the values are being changed within the function they are not retaining their values outside the scope of the function. Was my teacher wrong?

    aden_jones wrote:
    So to get behaviour similar to passing by reference I would need to create my own object and give it a method e.g. MyObject.changeValue(new_value) but I can't do that with Integer objects because I can't change their actual value I can only change the Integer Object that is being pointed at??You cannot achieve behavior that duplicates PBR with Java.
    However, if by "similar to passing by reference" you mean that the method makes a change that the caller can see, then, yes, you need to pass a reference to a mutable object, and change that object's state inside the method.
    void foo(Bar bar) {
      bar.setBaz(123);
    Bar bar = new Bar();
    bar.setBaz(999);
    foo(bar);
    // after foo() completes, the caller now sees that the Bar object's internal state has changed
    // from 999 to 123Note the difference between changing the value of a caller's variable (which can be done with PBR, and cannot be done in Java) and changing the state of the single object pointed to by both the caller's variable and the method's copy of that variable (which can be accomplished in Java, as it does not rely on PBR).

  • Blur moving object in AE CS6

    Hi:
    I need to blur a moving object:
    - The effect is only needed at some point of the video, it must appear, and then disappear, not being on screen the whole time.
    - The object is moving, and changing shape, the blur must adapt to it.
    - I've been trying to use the "Track Motion" option with Position & Rotation, then the "Analyze Forward" button, but the thing makes a mess all over, it's not following the object at all, then if You try to adjust it manually, it's only done in 1 frame, in the other frames the thing is off the object, then the "Tracking" stays on screen.
    Thanks in advance.

    Are you saying that you have something in some video that you have shot that you want blurred out? If so, you could create an adjustment layer with a mask on it over the object you want to blur and then just animate the mask over time. Now, you could use motion tracking to help that mask follow the object, but it sounds like you are having trouble with getting it to work properly. Try the tips here for doing motion tracking correctly. Alternatively, you could follow the tips on rotoscoping to make the mask animation go more quickly. Also, if you have After Effects version 12 (also known as AE CC), you can use the new mask tracker feature.

  • Lines on moving objects

    When I export DV clips from FCE I get lines appear on moving objects, (HDTV). When I export the same clip using iMovie08 it all looks smooth.
    I've tried the de-interlace, it made it worse.
    How can I get rid of the lines in FCE?

    shuggyboy1 wrote:
    ... What is the _best setting to export_ from imovie HD 6 to idvd to prevent this yet still maintain DV quality?
    .. not to export at all, that simple..
    the zillions of Export options could cause trouble.
    simply, store your iM projects in the 'Movies' folder of your Mac ...
    iDVD will 'find' them automatically and cares for itself to import..
    Plan B)
    drag'n drop the whole project from Finder to iDVD.. again: no export involved, no trouble..

  • When I render and Export there are these little lines around moving objects

    When I render and Export there are these little lines around moving objects, what are they and how do I fix it?

    The lines are caused by the video being interlaced.
    If you export to DVD they should no longer appear. However, if they don't disappear you can use the Deinterlace filter on the footage whilst in FCE.
    How are you exporting ..... QT Movie or QT Conversion ....... and what are you exporting to - the internet or DVD?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error while generating Distribution Model in ERP to EWM

    I am trying to generate new distribution Model from ERP to EWM for my warehouse. In system one distribution Model already exists for another warehouse. Below error encountered.

  • Library Filter keyword sort

    How do you sort (assending/decending) keywords in Library Filter Default columns?  Lightroom 5.2.  Mine begin with Z; I have seen others that begin with A.

  • How can I be a 100% member to skype ? Am 80% into ...

    Most people in PNG are new to this skype network a few who r in our city and traveled overseas may av used it, as for me, I am a 1st timer who dont use a credit card o either a paypal , that's why I cant be a ful 100% member. Can anyone advise me on

  • How long for a MasterCard Debit refund to show up in my account balance?

    I have been using my $500 PayPal balance to fund some home improvement projects.  I have been paying for things with my MasterCard Debit Card.   I just returned some items ($145 worth) and they said the amount had to go back on my MasterCard.   4 hou

  • Reverse settled cost of AuC

    Hi All, We have settled cost to AuC in Mar' 08 and now we can reverse it in Mar'09, Is it possible? When I try to reverse it the following message is displayed, " Reversal not possible; last settlement was in period 012 2009. Message No. KD547. pls.