MP3 support for WAVE Studio 7

Good evening. I have the X-Fi extreme audio (PCI-E). Do you know, why Wave Studio 7 is not support MP3 files?
Thanks?

I too have had the exact problems ever since I started using windows 7. I have had communications with tech support and all they keep telling me is to uninstall the program, re download it and it should work.
Well, that's like watching a re-run and expecting a different ending. It's the very same file installer , I've done it 4 times or more and it still does not let you save anything.
My conclusion is that it does NOT work on Windows 7 and they will not tell you that. I even tried an older version of Wave Studio and got the same results.
Maybe in the future they will fix it, but for now, they won't admit to it.
IF you should ever find a "fix" for it, please let me know as I like that program.
Wayne
[email protected]

Similar Messages

MP3 support for applets

Dear gurus of the forum,
I am a computer science student planning to create a website and considering the use of applets on it. On my previous website I used [Sound Manager 2|http://www.schillmania.com/projects/soundmanager2/] to play MP3 sounds. SM2 is a tiny flash program and has been a breeze to use. However, if I am to build decent applets, I'd prefer to somehow use MP3 support in Java, so users won't be required to have both Java and Flash installed.
I am a very basic Java programmer, but I know enough to get me started. However, thus far I have only been able to discover that Java supports .au sounds and more recently .wav and .aiff (which doesn't ring a bell). I have also found some MP3 player applets. However, the various old and new resources confuse me greatly on this subject.
My question is rather simple:
Is there any lightweight option to add basic support to play MP3 files in an applet? I do not need a player with buttons and whatnot, just classes with methods to use in my applet.
I can only hope someone here may be able to help me out here or send me in the right direction.
Thanks in advance,
Dysprosium

Hi Andrew,
no wonder you have 5,7?? posts.... you're just posting all day ha.... I wonder how many of those posts were actually useful,
anyways, I think that your place is somewhere in English Grammar forums or so 'cause that's all you know about...
There is no mention of that on the linked page. Can you produce a link that supports that statement?instead of wandering around, just do something really simple like googling android java platform, and RTFM from there on...
No. You think that.yes, I think, and as you can see in this reply I have some more thoughts about you !
.. then WHY DOESN'T ORACLE DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT ????? 1) There is no need to SHOUT at us.
2) One '?' denotes a question, whereas 2 or more typically denotes a bozo.
yes well, I've already said that you're great at gammar issues, way to go.
>
So maybe it is because Sun ignores shouting bozos. More likely it is because Sun staff do not trawl the forums looking for problems. That is what the [Bug Database|http://bugs.sun.com/] is for.
that's the first (and last) valuable information I got from you, you could have just replied with these two lines, or even make it shorter and just redirect me to the link, save electronic space, you're wasting it as if it was yours.
AFAIU neither Flash nor Java will be supported on iPad, so there is a new source of worry for you.who talks about iPad, dude, start getting into shape with your reading comprehension, though your grammar level is great ! Oh, and You need to start worrying my friend, you might know Java but start working on your English skills quickly...
I'm talking about Google's Android, Apple's Iphone, Windows Mobile and Nokia's Symbian.
oh, and don't bother increasing you post number by replying to this one with some more useless info.
thanks a lot

C++14 Standard Support for Solaris Studio

Hi Steve,
Currently, does Solaris Studio 12.4 Final Release support C++14 constructs? I saw the Standard C++ website https://isocpp.org/std/status and the C++14 Standard will soon release the final draft later this year.
But, given that C++14 is going to be a minor change as compared to C++11, which they mentioned C++14 mostly completes C++11 (in FAQ: https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/cpp14#cpp14-compilers), will the next release add support of C++14 before the next standard, which is slated for around 2017?
Although at this stage nothing has been confirmed yet, I wonder if the statement in the Standard C++ FAQ would mean that the new C++14 would still be treated as C++11, which would mean that Solaris Studio compilers would handle C++14 codes as under C++11 standard (i.e. the -std=c11 and -std=c++11 flags can be used to compile C++14 codes), though I am not sure.
Regards,
Brian

Compared to C++11, C++14 has two kinds of changes:
1. "Bug fixes": Primarily clarification of issues in C++11 that were incomplete or ambiguous, and loosening of rules that were deemed to be unnecessarily strict. There is at least one rule change, where C++11 required instantiation of unused template functions that had an exception-specification, and C++14 does not.
2. New features: New syntax, and new contents in the standard library.
Like most other compilers, Studio 12.4 in C++11 mode has many of the C++14 bug fixes, including the rule change about template functions that I mentioned above. (For one customer's code, the rule change resulted in a nearly 20x speedup in compile time, from days to hours.)
Studio 12.4 does not have any of the new C++14 features, and the compiler does not have a C++14 mode. The reason is timing; Studio 14 feature freeze predated approval of the C++14 standard. We prefer not to implement proposed new features until they are published in the standard, because features have a habit of changing between their supposedly final form and actual publication. We have been bitten by such changes in the past, and it creates problems for us, and our customers who depend on compiler stability for large projects.
We expect to implement C++14 in a future release. Oracle policy does not permit me to be more specific.

NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL supported for FC Studio II on DP PPC G5 2.5??

Up dated to 10.4.11 & Studio II (FC6.0.2) and no problem. Even launched Final cut once and all o.k.
2nd time, says grafix card, NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL isn't Quartz Extreme so, good by we're
quitting.
Swapped into another identical G5 and in Sys Profiler, says the card is Quartz Extreme supported.
What gives? I tried the Nvidia web site for drivers, but they show no Mac support.
Ideas?
thanks
p2

Any progress on this? I just ran into the same problem. I launch Final Cut Pro 6.0.3 and I get an error:
1)Final Cut Pro requires that your system have a Quartz Extreme capable video card.
2)Final Cut Pro recommends that your system have 64 MB of VRAM; this system has only 0 MB of VRAM.
3)The installed graphics card does not not support the OpenGL features recommended by Final Cut Pro.
System profilor shows the GeForce 6600, but no Quarts infomration.
PowerPC G5 Dual 2.3 - 2GB RAM, 10.4.11

Subversion support for Sun Studio 11 IDE

Hi there,
has anybody succeeded in using the Sun Studio 11 IDE with the Subversion SCM system? I searched the web for informations about this but didn't find anything.
Thanks for your help!
Jens Siebert

Jens,
The subversion module in netbeans is based on a current version
of netbeans (I'm not sure exactly which one). It very unlikely to work
with the Sun Studio 11 IDE because the Sun Studio 11 IDE is based
on a much older version of NetBeans (3.5.1 with modifications).
The next major release of Sun Studio should use the current
NetBeans release. It should work with the Subversion module.
Unfortunately, we won't be releasing for quite a while.
Gordon

Jdk 1.4 support for websphere studio 5.1

I am using Websphere application studio version 5.1 which uses jdk1.3 and not 1.4. My project requirement forces me to use jdk 1.4 swing components as 1.4 swing version has lot more than that of 1.3 (for e.g. masking for input field and lot more). Does anyone have an idea how can i use 1.4 (at least swing) into websphere application studio 5.1 (which uses jdk 1.3)?? or does anyone know how can i point/force websphere studio to use jdk version 1.4?
I would highly appreciate any pointers/reference material or anything like that.
Thanks,
Vicky

mriyer,
The Windows binaries in 2.3.10 were built using JDK 1.5 and did not use a -target 1.4 flag. You did the right thing by rebuilding.
Regards,
George

Support For .WAV G.711 Codec Files

THANK YOU Apple for supporting this Codec with the 2.0 release. We can finally listen to attached voicemail messages directly from mail. Woo Hoo.

I have the exact same problem with my vonage emails that get sent to my email on my iphone. It shows the attachment, but quicktime says it cannot play the movie.

How about support for Waves plugins or Universal Audio UAD plugins?

I wonder if Final Cut Pro X will become more stable in working with 3rd party audio plugins, like Waves or UAD? I use Waves, and the responsiveness of the system is very heavily affected. Anyone has same experiences or even a solution for this kind of behaviour?

I have a February 8 Core Machine and two UAD PCIe cards and I am have NO issues - I dont even have core overloads- today I ran a logic benchmark test on the cores and could run 50 instances on the test.
http://www.evan.se/logicprobenchmark/
Tom at UAD said that the issues were CPU spikes when using the UAD cards - not here!
You are not alone Andrew!. I have sent them my system profile and told them that i would be happy to do any tests.
cheers
Ivan

WaveStudio 7.12 (and/or Audio Pack for MP3 Support) product Help files

WaveStudio 7.2 product Help files (CTWAVE32.CHM) need to be revised to incorporate MP3 support, for those customers (like me) who have purchased the Audio Pack app for MP3 Support.
-OR-
Am I supposed to?just use the old WaveStudio 5.00.2 Help files (CTWave32.hlp)?
Also, there doesn't seem to be any way of uninstalling WaveStudio 5.00.2, unless I uninstall the whole suite of Creative MediaSource software... And that doesn't seem like very much fun at all... ? So, what, should I just leave WaveStudio 5.00.2 on the machine?

JRe: WaveStudio 7.2 (and/or Audio Pack for MP3 Support) product Help files?For anyone else experiencing this issue, the answer is:? Can't do it!? WaveStudio 5.00.20 can not be removed as a "stand-alone" application. The reason is, it's not listed as a separate program in Control Panel's Add or Remove Programs, and WaveStudio 5.00.20 has no Uninstall option.
Furthermore, WaveStudio 7.2 doesn't seem to overwrite the earlier version (it's still there and for some odd reason, it still works).
In order to remove the old version of WaveStudio, you must remove whichever Creative application that version of WaveStudio came bundled with.? Then, when you reinstall that application, WaveStudio 3.0 (or whatever iteration that application contained)?comes right back.
Therefore, the answer seems to be, you have to?li've with two versions of WaveStudio on the 'puter:? 7.2?and whatever earliest version the original bundled software?came with on the Soundblaster disc. Sad, but apparently true!? So, good day!? :smileytongue:

Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2008

We are currently using Visual Studio 2005 w/Crystal Report 11.5. We have been unable to migrate to Visual Studio 2008 up until now because the only version of Crystal Reports that was supported for Visual Studio 2008 was version 10 I believe, and that version did not contain some of the features that we are using in version 11.5.
I see that there is now an upgrade available to integrate Crystal Reports 2008 with Visual Studio 2008. My question is will this version of Crystal Reports give us the same or more features that we are currently getting with Crystal Reports 11.5?

Hi Clint,
It is a newer version so you should only gain functionality and not lose any from XI R2.
Make sure you use Crystal Reports 2008 Service Pack 0 as it is the version that is supported with VS.NET 2008.
Jason

I am using IMAQ vision for Measurement Studio, Ver6.0 with Measurement Studio Base Package,Ver6.0(Professional Edition).Can I work in IMAQ Vision for Measurement studio, Ver6.0 If I upgrade Measurement studio to Enterprise Edition,ver8.0.1

I am using IMAQ vision for Measurement Studio, Ver6.0 with Measurement Studio Base Package,Ver6.0(Professional Edition).Can I work in IMAQ Vision for Measurement studio, Ver6.0 If I upgrade Measurement studio to Enterprise Edition,ver8.0.1
Thanks
Biswajit

Howdy Biswajit,
The IMAQ and Vision ActiveX controls you are using with Visual Basic 6 do not install with Measurement Studio. They are installed when you install the IMAQ software and include support for Visual Studio 6. Upgrading to Measurement Studio 8.0.1 will have no effect on your IMAQ controls since they are not related to one another. Purchasing Measurement Studio Professional or Enterprise packages allows you Visual Studio 6 support for other ActiveX components. Refer to this link for a list of ActiveX components included in those packages.
If you are asking about using the ActiveX controls in .NET, then take a look at this KnowledgeBase entitled Do NI-IMAQ and NI Vision Support Microsoft Visual Studio .NET?
Hope this clarifies things!
Best Regards,
Jonathan N.
National Instruments

Wave Studio says "device doesn't support this format"

?Wave Studio says "device doesn't support this format"'I have a X-Fi Extreme Music card I'm using in Windows 7 (x64). I haven't had any issues with the card or the software until I installed a codec pack: Shark Windows 7 Codec pack. It worked OK, but when I try to play a WAV file in Creative Wave Studio (7), I get an error message: Sorry, your audio device doesn't support this format". Weird, since Wave Studio's "nati've" format is WAVs!!
So I uninstalled Shark, uninstalled Wave Studio, and uninstalled (from Device Manager) my sound card. Rebooted, then reinstalled the driver for the sound card, rebooted and reinstalled Wave Studio. I still get the error message and can't play WAVs in Wave Studio. The version is 7.2, and the driver is 6.0..375 (5/5/200). Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
Laner

CThe point is moot now, I've gotten a new computer and installed the card in that machine. Everything works great now. I would imagine there was a registry issue that didn't get cleaned, or something similar. Still, it would have been nice to resolve the problem, as someone else might experience the same issue and could find a way to help get it taken care of.
Cheers,
Laner

Future support for C++0x in Sun Studio

I've recently been having to defend my choice of using the sun studio compiler against several gcc advocates here in the office. The one reasonable issue they keep bringing up is when the upcoming C++0x (more like C++1x or even C++2x at the pace the standards committee is operating at) features will be available in complete fashion in sun studio. They say, and I have to begrudgingly agree, that judging by the amount of time it took studio to support boost (template templates, certain partial template specializations, etc), there could be a long delay between the release of gcc's C++0x support and that of studio's.
I understand that many of the new features of C++0x, even from initial glance, appear to be quite complicated, especially lambda functors and their associated []/auto return types, variadac template parameters and class concept checking. In addition, I understand gcc has an unfair advantage so to speak since it is being used as the test bed for many of the committee proposal submitter's proof-of-concept implementations (the variadic template parameter feasibility implementation written for gcc comes to mind).
Could a developer please assuage my fears and inform me that the studio team has a roadmap/timeframe in place to release a studio that fully supports the new language-level features in a reasonably competitive time frame? It apparently will be the responsibility of the STLPort team to essentially copy many of boost's libraries (shared_ptrs, random numbers, type_traits) and rename them and move them to the std namespace and also supply the new unordered<> containers, to name a few.
I for one can't wait until boost::mpl, boost::fusion, boost::format and others are all reduced from 10's of 1000's of lines of pre-processor generated crufty template definitions to a single variadic template declaration. Also, I won't feel quite so willfully derelict to efficient code every time i bust out an std::for_each and drop in a boost::bind generated functor and instead can use a lambda function with the various efficiency gains ranging from direct referencing to the stack variables passed in as the closure arguments to the ability for the compiler to actually inline the body of the lambda function where appropriate.
I'm in no way trying to accuse you compiler developers of being slow to implement features, but just would like to be assured that there is nothing to worry about and there is a plan and current work being done on the required features. I know it's still a couple of years off, but I personally can't wait to replace hundreds of lines of boost::bind() calls with their more efficent lambda equivalent, and in addition clean up interfaces that could have used boost::bind if it weren't for the unacceptable overhead introduced often executed blocks of code.
Thanks,
Chris Knight - Faithful sun studio user through at least 2 major name changes and since at lest when it was called Forte 4.2 and RougeWave and classicIO libraries roamed the earth in vast quantities.
P.S. I truly fear that the other 3 major compilers (gnu, intel, ms) will be out the door with C++0x in around the same time and boost will then willingly drop support for the sun compiler if it doesn't support the required language features at that time as they had no problem not supporting studio at all until Studio 12 so I'm sure as soon as the 3 compilers they run nightly tests with support it, they'll be just as eager to
make use of the new features as I am.
This leaves someone who has based their entire system on Solaris + SunStudio + Boost in a potentially undesirable situation. Solaris is far too stable and Linux to ever-changing to ever consider Linux as a platform for critical systems yet the idea of running g++ on Solaris w/ gcc's propensity to change their ABI on a weekly basis gives me immediate heartburn.
Thanks again.

You raise some very good points, and believe me, we are even more aware of them than you are!
Short answer: We are planning to bring out a compiler conforming to C++0X in a timely fashion.
Longer answer:
Right now, we are working on providing binary compatibility with g++ as an option in the next compiler release. When we are done, you will be able to use g++ headers with Sun C++, and link the code with binaries created by g++. The first implementation will be on Linux. (Which versions of g++ and which versions of Linux? Stay tuned.)
Implementing all the new features of C++0X will require a re-design of parts of the compiler front end. The current compiler organization does not support "concepts", for example. (We've been looking for an excuse to re-design the front end for a while, and C++0x is not just an excuse -- it's a requirement.) With the g++ ABI work done, we'll ready to start the re-design, and begin to implement C++0x features.
We won't release an official (stable, fully-supported) product with C++0X features until the standard is final. Until then, any feature could change in unpredictable ways. We got caught by that problem with C++ 4.2 and C++98 -- we implemented what we thought were final features that changed dramatically after we released the compiler. We won't do that again. Compiler stability is one of our most important considerations.
Beginning some time next year, we expect to have Express releases with some C++0X features. Express releases are our way of providing compilers with experimental features that might not be stable yet. It gives our customers a chance to try them out and provide feedback before they become part of a stable release. That is to say, a feature flagged as experimental is subject to change, and compatibility with other Express or official releases is not guaranteed. We can therefore fix bugs and catch up with late changes in the Standard as necessary.
We have not yet done all the planning for our C++0X compiler, so I can't give you any estimates about specific feature availability and time frames. When we are farther along, we'll post the road map on a public site, and I'll announce it here.
Steve Clamage
Sun C++ Team

Add support for WebLogic 10.3 to WorkSpace Studio 1.1

Hi,
I am using WorkSpace Studio 1.1 in Windows XP with Weblogic 10.0 and I would like to use WebLogic 10.3.
For adding a new Server whitch is not listed there is a message saying a new server will be downloaded and installed from a remote update manager site.
Where can I find the remote update manager site for download WebLogic 10.3 support in WorkSpace Studio 1.1???
Thanks in advance.
AR

Q: Do you see the project listed in AppXplorer view?
A: Yes
Q: Project > properties - Builders - by default "Workshop AppXRay builder" should be checked
A: Yes, it is checked. Moreove, Every check is active in "Project>properties - Validation - AppXRay" except "Report unresolved variable errors" and "Follow the JSP 2.0 Quoting and Escape Conventions", and there is no folder excluded.
Q: Are you able to open the JSP page in Workshop editor - Do you see Design/Source, Design & Source tabs?
A: Yes, I am. Yes, I do.
Sample Project Test:
- Create a simple web project
- Create a index.jsp page
- include a sample scriptlet code, set the breakpoint
- right click on the page, Run As > Run On Server - Select WLS instance (create one if you don't have)
- Click finish
- Verify if you are able to debug the sample project test.Following your steps, there was no stop at the breakpoint.
I also used "Debug As" instead of "Run As", and the result was the same
Any other ideas???
Thanks a lot.
AR

Please add support for MXF files created by Blackmagic Hyperdeck Studio

We have a Hyperdeck Studio that records DNxHD220 files in a MXF wrapper. Right now it is not possible to import them into Premiere CS5.5.
It would be great if Adobe would add support for those files.
Regards
NFact

It's mostly users here in the forums. Here's how to get Adobe to listen.
https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

MP3 support for WAVE Studio 7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for