MSEG, BSEG, MKPF
How would u go about improving the performance of a Program, which selects data from MSEG & MKPF or BSEG ?
Hi Subha,
Go through this info.
Disadvantages:
Basically index are provided to improver performance. i.e with index select on db tables retrieves data much faster.
If you are writting select statement on the table where in where clause you have non-primary keys then it takes longer to retriev data from DB table.
If you have select in dbtable on non-primary key you can create Secondary index with keys as per your where clause which result in faster DB table access.
But remember not to create too many secondary indexes on same table which could result in slow / degrage performance..
you can check out the link below for more inforamation on indexes
http://www.idig.za.net/mysqlindexes/2006/11/09/
Secondary Indexes
Advantages :
Secondary indexes are used to enhancement performance when retrieving data. For example, say you have a table AFKO where the key to the table is AUFNR. You can select data from this table using AUFNR, the performance will be great because you are using the key. Say you need to hit this table with GLTRP(finish date), it is not part of the key, so the performance would be poor. If you created a secondard index using this field GLTRP, the performance would be improved. Make sense?
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=1052972&messageID=1633228
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/cf/21eb20446011d189700000e8322d00/frameset.htm
sap.ittoolbox.com/documents/popular-q-and-a/specifying-the-index-to-be-used-2462
sap.ittoolbox.com/documents/popular-q-and-a/specifying-the-index-to-be-used-2462
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/quick-note-on-design-of-secondary-database-indexes-and-logical-databases.htm
**********rewords some points.
Rgds,
P.Naganjana Reddy
Similar Messages
-
Select Query info req for ZMKPFMSEG: View of MSEG and MKPF table
Hi
I am fetching 7-8 records frm ZMKPFMSEG: View of MSEG and MKPF table,which based on matnr,werks & budut,which is taking a large time,there is no index in the table,so can nay one tell me how to fetch the data,to make code more effictient.
SELECT budat
matnr
menge
bwart
meins
bwtar
waers
dmbtr
shkzg
matkl
FROM zmkpfmseg
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_mseg
WHERE budat GE r_ytd-low
AND matnr IN so_matnr
AND werks = p_werks
AND lgort IN so_lgort
AND matkl IN so_matkl.
plz tell me what changes have to be done in where condtion to make it run fast.
regdsHi,
Try the alternate Methods,
ACCESS VIA SUBQUERY.
SELECT * FROM MKPF AS M INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF SWAP
WHERE BUDAT IN BUDAT AND
MBLNR IN MBLNR AND
VGART = 'WA' AND
EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM MSEG
WHERE MBLNR = M~MBLNR
AND MJAHR = M~MJAHR
AND WERKS = P_WERKS
AND matnr IN so_matnr
AND lgort IN so_lgort
AND matkl IN so_matkl.
APPEND SWAP.CLEAR SWAP.
ENDSELECT.
LOOP AT SWAP.
SELECT * FROM MSEG
WHERE MBLNR = SWAP-MBLNR AND
MJAHR = SWAP-MJAHR AND
IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING SWAP TO ITAB.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING MSEG TO ITAB.
APPEND ITAB.CLEAR ITAB.
CLEAR MSEG.
ENDIF.
ENDSELECT.
CLEAR : SWAP,ITAB.
ENDLOOP.
Try this,
SELECT budat
matnr
menge
bwart
meins
bwtar
waers
dmbtr
shkzg
matkl
FROM zmkpfmseg
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_mseg
WHERE budat GE r_ytd-low
AND matnr IN so_matnr
AND lgort IN so_lgort
AND matkl IN so_matkl.
delete it_mseg where WERKS NE p_WERKS .
Reward Points if helpful.
Regards,
Balakumar.G -
Are there any alternatives for mseg and mkpf
I had to display from table S032...following fields.
S032-LETZTABG --> Date: last (i.e. most recent) goods issue
S032-LETZTVER --> Date: last (i.e. most recent) consumption
However the data was not properly filled in s032 table. So I went for mseg and mkpf table to get budat based on moment types.
SELECT MSEG~MATNR
MSEG~WERKS
MSEG~LGORT
MSEG~BWART
MKPF~BUDAT
INTO TABLE IT_MSEG
FROM MKPF AS MKPF INNER JOIN MSEG AS MSEG
ON
MKPFMBLNR = MSEGMBLNR AND
MKPFMJAHR = MSEGMJAHR
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_OUT_TMP
WHERE MSEG~MATNR EQ T_OUT_TMP-MATNR
AND MSEG~WERKS EQ T_OUT_TMP-WERKS.
Are there any other alternative table for mseg and mkpf...
Because my above coding ( which includes above SELECT of mseg and mkpf )got performance issue...
Could you please suggest me anyu other alternative for mseg and mkpf ...Try to include the BUDAT in the selection of the MKPF.. if you don't have any restriction in MKPF than just pass an empty range.
RANGES: S_BUDAT FOR MKPF-BUDAT.
SELECT
MKPF~BUDAT "<<<
MSEG~MATNR
MSEG~WERKS
MSEG~LGORT
MSEG~BWART
INTO TABLE IT_MSEG
FROM MKPF AS MKPF INNER JOIN MSEG AS MSEG
ON
MKPF~MBLNR = MSEG~MBLNR AND
MKPF~MJAHR = MSEG~MJAHR
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_OUT_TMP
WHERE
MKPF~BUDAT IN S_BUDAT " <<<
MSEG~MATNR EQ T_OUT_TMP-MATNR
AND MSEG~WERKS EQ T_OUT_TMP-WERKS.
Regards,
Naimesh Patel -
JOIN for BSEG, BSIS, BSAS, MSEG, BKPF and MKPF
I am developing a report related to G/L . i am using the Tables BSEG BSIS BSAS MSEG BKPF MKPF ............please give me the Joinings of these tables.......how exactly we can join and get the prefect Data....
Thank U waiting for ur replies....
Title edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Jun 3, 2008 3:41 PMI have given the tables, internal tables and the select queries which can give you the join conditions of your requirement.
tables: bsis,
bsas,
bkpf,
bseg,
ekbe,
mkpf,
mseg.
select-options: s_hkont for bseg-hkont,
s_bldat for bkpf-budat,
s_budat for bkpf-bldat obligatory,
s_lifnr for bseg-lifnr,
s_lfbnr for ekbe-lfbnr no intervals no-extension.
data: begin of i_bsis_bsas occurs 0,
bukrs like bsis-bukrs,
hkont like bsis-hkont,
gjahr like bsis-gjahr,
belnr like bsis-belnr,
budat like bsis-budat,
bldat like bsis-bldat,
xblnr like bsis-xblnr,
wrbtr like bsis-wrbtr,
buzei like bsis-buzei,
end of i_bsis_bsas,
begin of i_bkpf occurs 0,
bukrs like bsis-bukrs,
belnr like bsis-belnr,
gjahr like bsis-gjahr,
xblnr like bkpf-xblnr,
stblg like bkpf-stblg,
awtyp like bkpf-awtyp,
tcode like bkpf-tcode,
end of i_bkpf,
begin of i_bseg occurs 0,
bukrs like bsis-bukrs,
belnr like bsis-belnr,
gjahr like bsis-gjahr,
buzei like bseg-buzei,
buzid like bseg-buzid,
koart like bseg-koart,
zuonr like bseg-zuonr,
hkont like bseg-hkont,
lifnr like bseg-lifnr,
sgtxt like bseg-sgtxt,
ebeln like bseg-ebeln,
ebelp like bseg-ebelp,
wrbtr like bseg-wrbtr,
end of i_bseg,
begin of i_ekbe occurs 0,
ebeln like ekbe-ebeln,
ebelp like ekbe-ebelp,
gjahr like ekbe-gjahr,
belnr like ekbe-belnr,
buzei like ekbe-buzei,
lfgja like ekbe-lfgja,
lfbnr like ekbe-lfbnr,
lfpos like ekbe-lfpos,
matnr like ekbe-matnr,
end of i_ekbe,
begin of i_mkpf_mseg occurs 0,
mblnr like mkpf-mblnr,
mjahr like mkpf-mjahr,
bktxt like mkpf-bktxt,
xblnr like mkpf-xblnr,
frbnr like mkpf-frbnr,
zeile like mseg-zeile,
matnr like mseg-matnr,
erfmg like mseg-erfmg,
end of i_mkpf_mseg.
*data: wa_ekbe like i_ekbe.
select bukrs
hkont
gjahr
belnr
budat
bldat
xblnr
wrbtr
buzei appending corresponding fields of table i_bsis_bsas
from bsis
where bukrs eq p_bukrs
and hkont in s_hkont
and gjahr eq p_gjahr
and budat in s_budat
and shkzg eq 'S'.
select bukrs
hkont
gjahr
belnr
budat
bldat
xblnr
wrbtr appending corresponding fields of table i_bsis_bsas
from bsas
where bukrs eq p_bukrs
and hkont in s_hkont
and gjahr eq p_gjahr
and budat in s_budat
and shkzg eq 'S'.
endform. " f_get_bsis_bsas_data
*& Form f_get_bkpf_bseg_data
Subroutine to get BKPF and BSEG data
form f_get_bkpf_bseg_data.
check not i_bsis_bsas[] is initial.
select bukrs
belnr
gjahr
xblnr
stblg
awtyp
tcode into table i_bkpf
from bkpf
for all entries in i_bsis_bsas
where bukrs eq i_bsis_bsas-bukrs
and belnr eq i_bsis_bsas-belnr
and gjahr eq i_bsis_bsas-gjahr.
and awtyp = 'BKPFF'
and tcode = 'J1IE'.
check not i_bkpf[] is initial.
select bukrs
belnr
gjahr
buzei
buzid
koart
zuonr
hkont
lifnr
sgtxt
ebeln
ebelp
wrbtr into corresponding fields of table i_bseg
from bseg
for all entries in i_bsis_bsas
where bukrs eq i_bsis_bsas-bukrs
and belnr eq i_bsis_bsas-belnr
and gjahr eq i_bsis_bsas-gjahr.
and buzei eq i_bsis_bsas-buzei
and hkont eq i_bsis_bsas-hkont.
delete i_bseg where not hkont in s_hkont.
endform. " f_get_bkpf_bseg_data
*& Form f_get_ekbe_data
Subroutine to get EKBE data
form f_get_ekbe_data.
data: $i_bseg like i_bseg occurs 0 with header line.
$i_bseg[] = i_bseg[].
delete $i_bseg where ebeln is initial.
check not $i_bseg[] is initial.
select ebeln
ebelp
gjahr
belnr
buzei
lfgja
lfbnr
lfpos
matnr into table i_ekbe
from ekbe
for all entries in $i_bseg
where ebeln eq $i_bseg-ebeln
and ebelp eq $i_bseg-ebelp
and gjahr eq $i_bseg-gjahr
and bwart = '101'.
and belnr eq $i_bseg-belnr.
check not i_ekbe[] is initial.
select a~mblnr
a~mjahr
a~bktxt
a~xblnr
a~frbnr
b~zeile
b~matnr
b~werks
b~erfmg into table i_mkpf_mseg
from mkpf as a inner join
mseg as b on amblnr eq bmblnr
and amjahr eq bmjahr
for all entries in i_ekbe
where a~mblnr eq i_ekbe-lfbnr
and a~mjahr eq i_ekbe-gjahr
and b~zeile eq i_ekbe-lfpos
and b~werks eq p_werks.
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Edited by: Srikanth Kadiyala on Jun 3, 2008 7:24 AM
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Jun 3, 2008 3:40 PM -
Create a Logical Database Based on Mseg and Bseg
Hi,
how can i create a Logical database using bkpf,bseg,mkpf,mseg. i need to know , which table is a root node ?
could any one help me?
ThanksHi Amit,
While I am Creating the Logical Database by selection MKPF as root node, i have one problem.
my selection-screen is,
Plant Bseg-werks,
G/Laccount Bseg-Hkont,
Fin year bseg-gjahr,
Grn Date Bkpf-Budat,
Vendor No Bseg-lifnr,
Po Bseg-ebeln,
MatNr Bseg-matnr.
My LDB structure is
MKPF
Mseg
BKPF
Bseg.
My Doubt is, how can I access the glaccount details from bseg and How can i fetch the data from Mseg and Mkpf
(Grn details) .
If you give the Source code it is very useful to me.
Thanks,
Neptune.M -
Performance issue while selecting material documents MKPF & MSEG
Hello,
I'm facing performance issues in production while selecting Material documents for Sales order and item based on the Sales order Stock.
Here is the query :
I'm first selecting data from ebew table which is the Sales order Stock table then this query.
IF ibew[] IS NOT INITIAL AND ignore_material_documents IS INITIAL.
* Select the Material documents created for the the sales orders.
SELECT mkpf~mblnr mkpf~budat
mseg~matnr mseg~mat_kdauf mseg~mat_kdpos mseg~shkzg
mseg~dmbtr mseg~menge
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_mseg
FROM mkpf INNER JOIN mseg
ON mkpf~mandt = mseg~mandt
AND mkpf~mblnr = mseg~mblnr
AND mkpf~mjahr = mseg~mjahr
FOR ALL entries IN ibew
WHERE mseg~matnr = ibew-matnr
AND mseg~werks = ibew-bwkey
AND mseg~mat_kdauf = ibew-vbeln
AND mseg~mat_kdpos = ibew-posnr.
SORT i_mseg BY mat_kdauf ASCENDING
mat_kdpos ASCENDING
budat DESCENDING.
ENDIF.
I need to select the material documents because the end users want to see the stock as on certain date for the sales orders and only material document lines can give this information. Also EBEW table gives Stock only for current date.
For Example :
If the report was run for Stock date 30th Sept 2008, but on the 5th Oct 2008, then I need to consider the goods movements after 30th Sept and add if stock was issued or subtract if stock was added.
I know there is an Index MSEG~M in database system on mseg, however I don't know the Storage location LGORT and Movement types BWART that should be considered, so I tried to use all the Storage locations and Movement types available in the system, but this caused the query to run even slower than before.
I could create an index for the fields mentioned in where clause , but it would be an overhead anyways.
Your help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance
regards,
AdvaitHi Thomas,
Thanks for your reply. the performance of the query has significantly improved than before after switching the join from mseg join mkpf.
Actually, I even tried without join and looped using field symbols ,this is working slightly faster than the switched join.
Here are the result , tried with 371 records as our sandbox doesn't have too many entries unfortunately ,
Results before switching the join 146036 microseconds
Results after swithing the join 38029 microseconds
Results w/o join 28068 microseconds for selection and 5725 microseconds for looping
Thanks again.
regards,
Advait -
Hello Friends,
I have done some coading, thought to take ur opinion, if its right or not....
actually, I have following senario:
I have to select all document of TODAYS date ( MKPF-BLDAT) which are from some specific MSEG-LIFNR and the KUUNR is always e.g "123456" ( VBAK-KUNNR )
SO I made a VIEW with join condition...
MKPF-MANDT = MSEG-MANDT
MKPF-MANDT = VBAK-MANDT
MKPF-MBLNR = MSEG-MBLNR
MKPF-MJAHR = MSEG-MJAHR
MSEG-KDAUF = VBAK-VBELN
and make the select statement as:
SELECT * FROM /BAGCOI/MSVIEW
into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE lt_msview
WHERE
BLDAT in p_sdate AND
LIFNR eq c_lifnr AND
KUNNR eq c_kunnr.
Do u guys think, it will work for me ?
Regards,
PLS ask, if my post is not clear enough
Message was edited by:
Shah HHi Rob,
Could you pls explain about index ?
Secondlly, I need to have all goods movement of todays date ?, then it would be the filed BLDAT or ?
Regards,
Message was edited by:
Shah H -
Link up b/w MKPF,MSEG and RBKP,RSEG
Hi,
I am working on a report in which i have to make up a link b/w above mentioned tanles. till now i am able to make link between MSEG and MKPF but the problem is that when i go for the RBKP and Rseg it gives a bit problem as RBKP is a Header Table and RSEG is a item table ,the flow of logic conatins data from field MSEG-LFBNR which is EQ to RSEG-LFBNR and from there i pick up the BELNR and proceed to the PBKP .Is it a right process for reteriving the data?
Please provide me guidelines to solve this problem.Plz SEARCH in SCN before posting.
Re: EKBE - the connection between Invoice Recipt to Good Recipt -
Bad performance of MKPF / MSEG selects
Hi,
I am working on report for performance issue.
select-options : matnr FOR mara-matnr,
mtart FOR mara-mtart,
werks FOR mseg-werks NO INTERVALS,
lgort FOR mseg-lgort NO INTERVALS,
budat FOR mkpf-budat ,"OBLIGATORY,
reci FOR mseg-bwart ,"OBLIGATORY NO INTERVALS,
iss FOR mseg-bwart ."
select queries are followings but inside loop.
loop at itab.
at new matnr.
SELECT SUM( MENGE ) INTO qty1 from mkpf inner join mseg on
MKPF~MBLNR = MSEG~MBLNR and MKPF~MJAHR = MSEG~MJAHR
WHERE MSEG~MATNR = itab-MATNR AND WERKS in WERKS
AND BUDAT < BUDAT-LOW and SHKZG = 'S'
AND BWART IN ('561','105','101','309','701').
SELECT SUM( MENGE ) INTO qty2 from mkpf inner join mseg on
MKPF~MBLNR = MSEG~MBLNR and MKPF~MJAHR = MSEG~MJAHR
WHERE MSEG~MATNR = itab-MATNR AND WERKS in WERKS
AND BUDAT < BUDAT-LOW and SHKZG = 'H'
AND BWART IN ('562','201','261','502','543','333','551' ) .
SELECT SUM( MENGE ) INTO r_qty1 from mkpf inner join mseg on
MKPF~MBLNR = MSEG~MBLNR and MKPF~MJAHR = MSEG~MJAHR
WHERE MSEG~MATNR = itab-MATNR AND WERKS in WERKS
AND BUDAT IN BUDAT AND SHKZG = 'S' AND
bwart in reci.
SELECT SUM( MENGE ) INTO R_qty2 from mkpf inner join mseg on
MKPF~MBLNR = MSEG~MBLNR and MKPF~MJAHR = MSEG~MJAHR
WHERE MSEG~MATNR = itab-MATNR AND WERKS in WERKS
AND BUDAT IN BUDAT and SHKZG = 'H'
and bwart in reci.
SELECT SUM( menge ) INTO q1_qty1 from mkpf inner join mseg on
MKPF~MBLNR = MSEG~MBLNR and MKPF~MJAHR = MSEG~MJAHR
WHERE MSEG~MATNR = itab-MATNR AND WERKS in WERKS
AND BUDAT IN BUDAT AND SHKZG = 'S' AND
bwart in iss.
SELECT SUM( menge ) INTO q1_qty2 from mkpf inner join mseg on
MKPF~MBLNR = MSEG~MBLNR and MKPF~MJAHR = MSEG~MJAHR
WHERE MSEG~MATNR = itab-MATNR AND WERKS in WERKS
AND BUDAT IN BUDAT AND SHKZG = 'S' AND
bwart in iss.
after that calculations..
endat.
endloop.
Its performance is very poor. It takes lot much time to get output.
I want to replace the code with for all entries..
Then 2 slect statements based on mkpf table
1 ) for budat in budat
2) for budat > budat-low.
the based on this 8- 10 select statement from mseg table.
how to get into final table all data ....Thanks sir. I worked like that.
SELECT mblnr mjahr vgart blart blaum budat FROM mkpf INTO TABLE tt_mkpf
WHERE budat IN s_budat.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
SORT tt_mkpf BY mblnr mjahr budat.
ENDIF.
IF NOT tt_mkpf[] IS INITIAL.
select matnr mblnr mjahr zeile bwart werks lgort shkzg dmbtr menge
FROM mseg INTO corresponding fields of TABLE tt_mseg_temp FOR ALL ENTRIES IN tt_mkpf
WHERE mblnr = tt_mkpf-mblnr
AND mjahr = tt_mkpf-mjahr
AND ( shkzg = 'S'
or shkzg = 'H' )
and matnr in s_matnr
and lgort in s_lgort
and werks in s_werks
and ( bwart in s_reci or
bwart in s_iss ).
and for second case SELECT mblnr mjahr vgart blart blaum budat FROM mkpf INTO TABLE tt_mkpf
WHERE budat < s_budat.
after fetching data from mseg based on above statement .
how to take the data to final table based on two mkpf amd mseg table data so that i can use loop tt at into wa . I need just small assistane on this. -
Hi,
In mY report,
I have BUDAT as select-options and
WERKS as select-options.
Based on MBLNR, MJAHR from MKPF into table it_mkpf where Budat in s_BUDAT.
after that I am fetching MSEG data using for all entries in it_mkpf where werks in s_werks.
for low date range it is working fine.
For higher date range ,I am getting around 2 Lacs of records in MKPF , but while fetching MSEG ,Its getting dump with message endless Loop.
How can increase my performance.
Is there any Function Module to fetch data.
Can anybody suggest me.
Thanks
kumar nHi Kumar,
I have the same situation,
where I will have 1.5 lakhs minimum records from MKPF every month,,,
now my total database is nearly 35 million records till date from 1998.
and getting records from MKPF is not difficult its very easy even 35 million records,,,
But after getting from MSEG by MKPF is Hell,,,,
but I see Joins are far better , best in these cases,,,
So after that i have written a Code snippet in "Code-gallery" in SAP -Wiki, with title Joins are Better in some cases
Author: Dileep Kumar
Submitted: 11.02.2009
Description : Join Statement is the best in some cases as shown below than For All Entries. So Dont Forget about Joins Simply. Keep trying with joins
sometimes, where you can get a better performance.
Dont forget about joins simply like that due to performances. Now in this case(A Business Requirement) Joins is the best than FOR ALL ENTRIES.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TY_MKPF ,
MBLNR TYPE MKPF-MBLNR, "Material document
MJAHR TYPE MKPF-MJAHR,
BUDAT TYPE MKPF-BUDAT, "Posting Date in the document
END OF TY_MKPF.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TY_MSEG1 ,
MJAHR TYPE MKPF-MJAHR,
BUDAT TYPE MKPF-BUDAT, "Posting Date in the document
MBLNR TYPE MSEG-MBLNR, "Material document
MATNR TYPE MSEG-MATNR, "Material Number
ZEILE TYPE MSEG-ZEILE, "Item in material document
BWART TYPE MSEG-BWART, "Movement Type
CHARG TYPE MSEG-CHARG, "Batch Number
EBELN TYPE MSEG-EBELN, "PO #
SHKZG TYPE MSEG-SHKZG, "Debit/Credit Indicator
MENGE TYPE MSEG-MENGE, "Quantity
MEINS TYPE MSEG-MEINS, "UOM
DMBTR TYPE MSEG-DMBTR, "Amount in local currency
WAERS TYPE MSEG-WAERS, "Currency Key
END OF TY_MSEG1.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TY_MSEG ,
MBLNR TYPE MSEG-MBLNR, "Material document
MATNR TYPE MSEG-MATNR, "Material Number
ZEILE TYPE MSEG-ZEILE, "Item in material document
BWART TYPE MSEG-BWART, "Movement Type
CHARG TYPE MSEG-CHARG, "Batch Number
EBELN TYPE MSEG-EBELN, "PO #
SHKZG TYPE MSEG-SHKZG, "Debit/Credit Indicator
MENGE TYPE MSEG-MENGE, "Quantity
MEINS TYPE MSEG-MEINS, "UOM
DMBTR TYPE MSEG-DMBTR, "Amount in local currency
WAERS TYPE MSEG-WAERS, "Currency Key
END OF TY_MSEG.
DATA : IT_MSEG TYPE TABLE OF TY_MSEG, WA_MSEG LIKE LINE OF IT_MSEG.
DATA : IT_MKPF TYPE TABLE OF TY_MKPF, WA_MKPF LIKE LINE OF IT_MKPF.
DATA : IT_MSEG1 TYPE TABLE OF TY_MSEG1, WA_MSEG1 LIKE LINE OF IT_MSEG1.
SELECT-OPTIONS :
S_BUDAT FOR MKPF-BUDAT," OBLIGATORY, " Posting Date.
S_MATNR FOR MSEG-MATNR," OBLIGATORY. " Material No.
S_WERKS FOR MSEG-WERKS." OBLIGATORY, " Plant
Start-of-Selection.
*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
SELECT MBLNR MJAHR BUDAT
INTO TABLE IT_MKPF
FROM MKPF
WHERE BUDAT IN S_BUDAT.
IF IT_MKPF IS NOT INITIAL.
SELECT MBLNR MATNR ZEILE BWART CHARG EBELN SHKZG MENGE MEINS DMBTR WAERS
FROM MSEG
INTO TABLE IT_MSEG
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_MKPF
WHERE MBLNR = IT_MKPF-MBLNR AND
MJAHR = IT_MKPF-MJAHR AND
MATNR IN S_MATNR AND
WERKS IN S_WERKS .
ENDIF.
*compared to the above For all entries, below Join can perform well &
*Good for 2nd & third runs are much faster as they store data in Buffer memory..
*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
SELECT AMJAHR ABUDAT BMBLNR BMATNR BZEILE BBWART B~CHARG
BEBELN BSHKZG BMENGE BMEINS BDMBTR BWAERS
INTO TABLE IT_MSEG1
FROM MKPF AS A INNER JOIN MSEG AS B ON AMBLNR = BMBLNR AND
AMJAHR = BMJAHR
WHERE A~BUDAT IN S_BUDAT AND
B~MATNR IN S_MATNR AND
B~WERKS IN S_WERKS .
*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Thanks & regards,
Dileep .C -
Urgent: Regarding Inner join relation b/w MSEG, MKPF, MARA and MAKT
I have written o code like below for inner join. However, The program has take much more time to give out put. Could any one please correct the below inner join statement. Its very urgent.
Thanks for your help.
SELECT mseg~mblnr
mseg~matnr
mseg~werks
mseg~charg
mseg~lifnr
mseg~bualt
mseg~erfmg
mseg~ebeln
mseg~ebelp
mkpf~budat
mara~zzshelf_life
makt~maktx
FROM mseg
INNER JOIN mkpf
ON mkpfmblnr EQ msegmblnr
INNER JOIN mara
ON msegmatnr EQ maramatnr
INNER JOIN makt
ON maramatnr EQ maktmatnr
INTO TABLE gt_mat_doc
WHERE mseg~matnr IN s_matnr
AND mseg~werks IN s_werks
AND mseg~lifnr IN s_lifnr
AND mseg~bwart EQ p_bwart
AND ( msegebeln NE ' ' AND msegebeln IN s_ebeln )
AND mkpf~budat IN s_budat
AND mara~mtart IN s_mtart
AND makt~spras EQ sy-langu.Hi,
Do like this
Types: begin of ty_mesg_mkpf,
mblnr type mseg-mblnr,
matnr type mseg-matnr,
werks type mseg-werks,
charg type mseg-charg,
lifnr type mseg-lifnr,
bualt type mseg-bualt,
erfmg type mseg-erfmg,
ebeln type mseg-ebeln,
ebelp type mseg-ebelp,
budat type mkpf-budat,
end of ty_mseg_mkpf,
Begin og ty_mara_makt,
matnr type mara-matnr,
zzshelf_life type mara-zzshelf_life,
maktx type makt-maktx,
end of ty_mara_makt.
Data: it_mseg_mkpf type table of ty_mseg_mkpf,
wa_mseg_mkpf type ty_mseg_mkpf,
it_mara_makt type table of ty_mara_makt,
wa_mara_makt type ty_mara_makt.
SELECT m1~mblnr
m1~matnr
m1~werks
m1~charg
m1~lifnr
m1~bualt
m1~erfmg
m1~ebeln
m1~ebelp
m2~budat
FROM mseg
INTO TABLE it_mseg_mkpf
INNER JOIN mkpf
ON m1mblnr EQ m2mblnr
WHERE m1~matnr IN s_matnr
AND m1~werks IN s_werks
AND m1~lifnr IN s_lifnr
AND m1~bwart EQ p_bwart
AND ( m1ebeln NE ' ' AND m1ebeln IN s_ebeln )
AND m2~budat IN s_budat
if sy-subrc = 0.
Select m3~matnr
m3~zzshelf_life
m4~maktx from mara as m3
INNER JOIN makt as m4
ON m3matnr EQ m4matnr
INTO TABLE it_mara_makt
where m3~mtart IN s_mtart
AND m4~spras EQ sy-langu.
endif.
loop at it_mseg_mkpf into wa_mseg_mkpf.
Move necessary field values from wa_mseg_mkpf to wa_mat_doc.
Read table it_mara_makt into wa_mara_makt with key matnr = wa_mseg_mkpf-matnr.
if sy-subrc = 0.
move remaining field values to wa_mat_doc.
append wa_mat_doc to gt_mat_doc.
clear wa_mat_doc.
endif.
endloop.
Regards,
Satish -
Table mseg, mkpf cpu 90% problem
when we run the report about some big table such as "mseg" or "mkpf", the os resouce cpu is occupied 90% .
our os is AIX 5,3 , memory 4G , one power 5 cpu,
I do no know is there some problem about my sap system? thanks
what can I do to these special tables daily? Could you give me some advices??Maybe the report is to big, maybe you need to check if the indexes are right... You can do a trace via ST01 and find out if theres any particular sql statement that is taking too long and check the indexes.
Regards
Juan -
Performance issue with MSEG table in Production
Hi,
I have written a report with 4 select queries.
First i am selecting data from VBRK table in i_vbrk. Then for all entries in i_vbrk, i am fetching records from VBRP into i_vbrp table. Then for all entries in i_vbrp, records are fetched from MKPF into i_mkpf. Then, finally for all entries in i_mkpf, records are fetched from MSEG into i_mseg table.
Performance of this report is good in Quality system, but it is very poor in Production systems. It is taking more than 20 mins to get executed. MSEG table query is taking most of the time.
I have done indexing and packet sizing on MSEG table, but still performace issue persists. So, cqan you please let me know if there is any way by which performace of the program can be improved???
Please help.
Thanks,
ArchanaHi Archana,
I was having the same issue for MKPF and MSEG , I am using INNER JOIN Condition .
SELECT
mkpf~mblnr
mkpf~mjahr
mkpf~budat
mkpf~usnam
mkpf~bktxt
mseg~zeile
mseg~bwart
mseg~prctr
mseg~matnr
mseg~werks
mseg~lgort
mseg~menge
mseg~meins
mseg~ebeln
mseg~sgtxt
mseg~shkzg
mseg~dmbtr
mseg~waers
mseg~sobkz
mkpf~xblnr
mkpf~frbnr
mseg~lifnr
INTO TABLE xmseg
FROM mkpf
INNER JOIN mseg
ON mkpfmandt EQ msegmandt AND
mkpfmblnr EQ msegmblnr AND
mkpfmjahr EQ msegmjahr
WHERE mkpf~vgart IN se_vgart
AND mkpf~budat IN se_budat
AND mkpf~usnam IN se_usnam
AND mkpf~bktxt IN se_bktxt
AND mseg~bwart IN se_bwart
AND mseg~matnr IN se_matnr
AND mseg~werks IN se_werks
AND mseg~lgort IN se_lgort
AND mseg~sobkz IN se_sobkz
AND mseg~lifnr IN se_lifnr
%_HINTS ORACLE '&SUBSTITUTE VALUES&'.
But still I have a issue in performance , Can anybody give some suggestions , please .
Regards,
Shiv -
Connect VBRP-VGBEL with MKPF-XBLNR
Hello,
I need to create a query with sales invoice number, material code, sales price, quantity, amt in local currency.
The problem right now is the list displays all material document including that the outbound delivery was cancelled. Thus, if the user did outbound delivery followed by cancelling outbound and redoing outbound delivery, 3 duplicated information with different material document number is displayed.
So, the solution I am thinking about is to link the delivery document number in VBRP and MKPF. However, the system doesn't allow me to do that.
Currently I am using VBRK, VBRP, MSEG, and MKPF for the tables.
Any suggestions welcomed.
Thank you,Hello Takako,
look into the following table
LEDSPD_FLOW Document Flow for Subsequent Outbound-Delivery Split
Or
You can go in table vbfa which store the flow of the documents created ie.
go with the invoice no you have and look for the preceeding delivery documents ie of Status (J), now in you case you may get 3 documents
one outbound delivery created
one for cancelled and
one for recreation.
Once you get these document nos you need to find out the reference document of the cancelled delivery document,it will store the delivery document no against which this is cancelled.
You may check lips and likp if you want
Thanks.
Regards.
Sunmit. -
Relation between MSEG table and movement types in 2lis_03_bf
Hi all,
May i know the relation between MSEG table and 2lis_03 _bf xtractor stock type/stockcategory where we see the informarion in r/3 side for this, you answers gets rewarded.
regards,
Dan.Hi,
Most of the data for IM comes from the tables MSEG andd MKPF. You can go to MSEG contents and see the data there. You will find all the movement types, stock types and stock categories there. You can also use the transactions MB5B, MB51 etc.. to see the related info in R/3. As I said most of the data comes from these tables but not all the data. It uses some internal programming to get the data.
Hope it helps...
Maybe you are looking for
-
Disabled iPod not recognized by iTunes, completely locked.
Hello, Recently, a friend of mine who had my iPod touch at the time was playing around with it, just basically messing with random settings. He set a passcode made up of random numbers in the process, neither of us know the combination. We made a few
-
I recently purchased an HP Laserjet Pro CP 1025nw wireless printer. If I turn off the printer it is offline when I turn it back on. I left it on all night and it was offline this morning. The only way to resurrect it is to uninstall and install th
-
Special MTO Scenario - Costing Issues
Hi, Not sure if I should post it here or in the FI / CO forum, but here it is ... I'm in the process of implementing APO in a Aerospace company in Montréal, Canada and we're stuck on an Account Assignment Planning, and Product Costing issue. Today, a
-
System is not picking bank out going account in TBB1
Hi All, I am facing the problem in TBB1 accounting entries, system is picking the bank main account (From House bank/account id assigned GL) Not picking Bank out going account from account determination Example: Accounting entry at the time of TBB1:
-
I swapped my iphone from apple store india and my imei of iphone changed and i have lost the box and bill of phone , how can i get my old imei number.