Much easier in ASP than Servlets - prove me wrong..please

Be the judge - is ASP better than servlets in this case?
Here is the ASP/script segment that can take binary image data stored in a buffer and with one simple method - return that data to the browser - such that the image appears in the requesting browser window, simple? in ASP, yes. Servlets? convince me its easier than this.
ASP APPROACH:
'Buff is a simple array of bytes - just assume its prefilled'
Response.BinaryWrite(Buff)
This works. I see the image in the browser window that points to this ASP page.
SERVLET APPROACH:
// First get the data from the source where its stored, I do this with:
BufferedInputStream in = new BufferedInputStream(connection.getInputStream());
int size = in.available();
response.setContentType("image/jpg");
// now I need to put the data in a buffer, buff
// first opening an outputstream on the response
ServletOutputStream out = response.getOutputStream();
byte[] buff = new byte[size];
int count;
while ((count = in.read(buff)) != -1)
out.write(buff, 0, count);
This will not return the image directly back to the browser window. IE doesn't identify the data type coming in...asks you to open or save it, then makes you choose the application to read it - forcing you to open another window...finally you can see the image.
Questions:
A.) Is there a better way to do this using servlets so it will not prompt me to open or save the file? I cannot use IMG SRC and HTML tags - I must only return the image like in ASP. Only needs the image.
B.) Does MS hide implementation for ASP in their browser to make this easier for them?
C.) Am I just a terrible Java programmer? (watch it!)
D.) All of the above.

You can go even further. Program in Visual Basic is much, much simpler than in Java. Why all those "crazy" people are using Java.
Everything from MS starting from OS to distributed technologies is outdated.
So, ...

Similar Messages

  • Is ASM easier to use than BCEL?

    I need to use a library to manipulate bytecode, I was just wondering if ASM is much easier to use than BCEL because im tearing my hair out with BCEL.

    folks often say that
    asm is like sax,
    bcel is like dom
    for parsing class files, i think they are both pretty simple.
    If you are creating classes, they tend to both be more difficult.
    asm is a little more consistent and lite weight.
    bcel is a little better handling the constant pool, and also has the concept of a Repository (classpath).
    For new work, you probably should use asm, as there probably will be more support going forward, for new features.

  • Does any body have any opinions on how much better CS6 is than Cs4?

    Does any body have any opinions on how much better CS6 is than Cs4?  The reason I ask is I am trying to convince my business partner that CS6 is worth buying 

    My pattern has been that every other new version made it worth my while. I spent very little time working in CS4, since I went from CS3, to CS4 with an immediate upgrade to CS5. Then from CS5 to CS5.5 with an immediate upgrade to CS6. I have not gone to the cloud, so cannot comment on the features there. I would still evaluate your price for CS6 against the rental expense.
    I like Todd Kopriva's page laying out the CS6 new/changes features:
    Premiere Pro CS6: what’s new and changed
    That page contains other links (e.g. CS5 and CS5.5 changes).
    In addition to cc_merchant's points about 64 bit (which were HUGE and for CS6 included Encore going to 64 bit), I found these items from the "new" list as important to me:
    adjustment layers (HUGE)
    expanded multi-camera editing, with more multicam angles and improved interface (I hated only having 4 angles, although that usually worked)
    improved color features, including integration with SpeedGrade and redesigned Three-Way Color Corrector effect
    improved workflows with other applications in Adobe Creative Suite, as well as with Final Cut Pro and Avid software
    faster Adobe Media Encoder, redesigned to make authoring for multiple outputs and mobile devices easier (batch processing was added with CS4, but it wasn't until CS6, with other enhancements that I really worked it)
    enhanced Adobe Encore for creation of DVDs, Blu-ray Discs, and web DVDs (Bluray chapter playlists finally; I have used the flash output, which has gotten better at each step)

  • How do I add Smart Contacts to my iPhone? Using these makes searching for a Contact so much easier, but this feature seems only to be available on my Mac

    How do I add my Smart Contacts (on  my Mac), to my iPhone? The Smart Contacts facility makes searching for a Contact so much easier, but this facility does not seem to be available on my iPhone.
    Any suggestions?

    How do I add my Smart Contacts (on  my Mac), to my iPhone? The Smart Contacts facility makes searching for a Contact so much easier, but this facility does not seem to be available on my iPhone.
    Any suggestions?

  • IPhone 4s updated with IOS 8. Not the calendar will not show a full list of dates. Instead it shows the whole month with the list of the day selected. I want to have my full list back. So much easier to scroll thru when making appointments.

    iPhone 4s just updated with IOS 8. Now my calendar does not offer the full list of items by day on the screen. Instead I see the month and below the month are the appointments in a list for the selected day only. I would like the option to have the full list available as it is much easier to scroll thru the list when making appointments.

    Hello memormor,
    Thank you for visiting Apple Support Communities.
    To see the full scrollable list of events, start from the day view (tap on a day), not the month view, then click .
    Calendar at a glance - iPhone
    View a list of events. In month view, tap to see a day’s events. In day view, tap .
    Take care,
    Nubz

  • How can I save a page and all its component parts in a single file, like IE does as an MHT - it's much easier for mailing to people where page address not available?? (as in output from an airline booking site, for example)

    how can I save a page and all its component parts in a single file, like IE does as an MHT?
    It's much easier for mailing to people where page address not available?? (as in output from an airline booking site, for example)
    It is simply too painful to have to zip everything up into a single file to send. MHT format has been available for years now from IE, and with every new FF release it's the first thing I look for. I have been using FF for years, and hate having to come out of it, over into IE |(which I even took out of startup) and key everything in again, in order to send somebody something in a convenient format that they can open with a single click.
    I can't believe this hasn't been asked before, so have you looked at it and rejected it? Have MS kept the file format secret?
    Thanks
    MG

    This is not really an answer just my comments on your question.
    I am sure I recollect efforts being made to get mhtml to work with FF.
    Probably the important thing to remember about .mhtml is that if other browsers do support it they may need addons, and may not necessarily render the content correctly/consistently.
    There are FF addons designed for archiving webpages, you could try them, but that then assumes the recipient has the same software.
    You could simply save the page from FF to your XP pc; then offline open it with and save it using IE, before then emailing using FF, and attaching the .mht or mhtml file that you have now created on your PC.
    As an alternative method, in some cases it could be worth considering taking a screen grab of the required page, then sending that to the recipient as a single email attatchment using either a bitmap or jpeg file format for instance.
    Something such as an airline booking may be designed with a print option, possibly it could be worthwile looking at sending the print file itself as an email attachment.

  • Am new at pages and cannot figure out how to insert a bullet where I want it in the text, not at the beginning of the paragraph.  Word was much easier for me

    Am new at this forum and also at pages and can't figure out how to insert a bullet where I want it in the text, not at the beginning of the paragraph.  I found word much easier to use.  Please help. Trying to do a resume.

    On a US keyboard it is Option + 8 (above the letters). •

  • Is snow leopard usb backup drive access much much quicker using firewire than with usb 2.0 ?

    is snow leopard usb backup drive access much much quicker using firewire than with usb 2.0 ?

    I migrated from a USB2 external hard drive (when it failed) to the Firewire 800 and have not looked back.  I also sync from that primary drive to a secondary backup drive (still USB2).  Everything I do with the firewire drive is significantly faster than USB2.

  • Just how much better is nattres than compressor in converting pal - NTSC?

    I am on the verge of buying the Nattres plugin but before i do i would like to know how much better it is than compressor. I did some test with compressor and the results are unacceptable. I have to send some stock footage to America from here in South Africa. The footage im trying to convert is half Betacam half DVCPROHD.
    Thanks
    Andre
    I have posted this thread in the compressor forum but didnt quite get the answer i was looking for, although it was helpful

    I don't think Natress is over $75.
    Natress is the only plug-in or software that has given us consistent results.
    It also does PAL to NTSC or NTSC to PAL.
    Rendering can take a while depending on the length of your sequence.
    Edit in PAL and when you are done duplicate your sequence and make an NTSC version. You can then avoid having to convert footage that doesn't end up in your final sequence.

  • IBM DB2 is easier to administer than Oracle, is it true?

    Today i found a reference , here it is
    http://smarterquestions.org/2011/04/why-ibm-db2-is-easier-to-administer-than-oracle/
    http://blog.triton.co.uk/2010/12/db2-beats-oracle-database-in-final-task-showdown/
    they are saying "IBM DB2 is easier to administer than Oracle"
    another one saying "DB2 beats Oracle Database in final task showdown"
    so, whats your opinion sir ?
    Regards
    Halim

    I found below links of your interest :
    http://www.mssqlcity.com/Articles/Compare/oracle_vs_db2.htm
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_relational_database_management_systems
    ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/data/highlights/dbmscomparison.pdf
    I think these points will be part of comparison :
    ===========================================================
    Issue               
    ===========================================================
    CODD Rules
    Price
    Support
    Hardware requirements
    Software requirements
    Documentation
    Administration/Manageability
    Performance
    Job opportunities
    Scalability
    Portability
    High Availability
    Application Development
    Business Intelligence
    Integration
    Connectivity and Interoperability
    On-demand and Grid-Computing
    Cloud Environment
    Bugs
    Native network encryption     
    Brute-force protection     
    Enterprise directory compatibility     
    Password complexity rules     
    Patch access     
    Run unprivileged     
    Audit     
    Resource limit     
    Separation of duties      
    Security Certification
    Partitioning
    Data Domain     
    Cursor     
    Trigger     
    Function     
    Procedure     
    External routine
    Data Types
    Union     
    Intersect     
    Except     
    Inner joins     
    Outer joins     
    Inner selects     
    Merge joins     
    Blobs and Clobs     
    Common Table Expressions     
    Windowing Functions     
    Parallel Query
    Indexes and their Types
    Temporary Tables
    Materialized Views
    Limitations/Max sizes
    ACID     
    Referential integrity     
    Transactions     
    Unicode     
    Interface
    Supporting OSs
    Exception handling
    Backups
    OLTP,DSS,VLDB
    Certification/CoursesI am just pasting these points from above links and couple of points from different links though.
    Now, your question. IBM DB2 is easier to administer than Oracle, is it true? What if i or someone says Yes or No. Will you simply ignore above points ?
    Regards
    Girish Sharma

  • Another one with much higher BB usage than normal

    Hi,
    This is probably going to sound familiar to lots of people, but we also are recording much higher BB usage than normal. We are only on the 10gb package, as our max 512kb broadband doesn't make it worthwhile trying to do much with the www.
    Our usage is usually pretty close to the 10gb, and in fact we have probably gone over it 3 or 4 times in the last 2 years (I work away a lot, so Skype gets hammered, which I know could be up to about 350mb/hour). Our average usage has been 9.87gb according to BT. I was home at the end of June, and decided to reactivate BT FON, and my wife and I also installed the Smarttalk app. Now, halfway through July, we are already up at over 7gb used.
    The warning e-mail for 6gb used was last night, the usage monitor is already showing over 7gb - that is a heck of a lot of broadband usage for a property with such a slow connection. I have tried tackling BT in the past, and got absolutely nowhere, being told that although they could give me details of the previous weeks usage, they couldn't go back any further because that informaton was unavailable - unsatisfactory response, but that was all I could get.
    Obviously BT are saying we could always go unlimited, but I'd rather find out what the issue is and why this sudden increase - we aren't using that much internet.
    Iain

    Iain_L wrote:
    Hi,
    This is probably going to sound familiar to lots of people, but we also are recording much higher BB usage than normal. We are only on the 10gb package, as our max 512kb broadband doesn't make it worthwhile trying to do much with the www.
    Our usage is usually pretty close to the 10gb, and in fact we have probably gone over it 3 or 4 times in the last 2 years (I work away a lot, so Skype gets hammered, which I know could be up to about 350mb/hour). Our average usage has been 9.87gb according to BT. I was home at the end of June, and decided to reactivate BT FON, and my wife and I also installed the Smarttalk app. Now, halfway through July, we are already up at over 7gb used.
    The warning e-mail for 6gb used was last night, the usage monitor is already showing over 7gb - that is a heck of a lot of broadband usage for a property with such a slow connection. I have tried tackling BT in the past, and got absolutely nowhere, being told that although they could give me details of the previous weeks usage, they couldn't go back any further because that informaton was unavailable - unsatisfactory response, but that was all I could get.
    Obviously BT are saying we could always go unlimited, but I'd rather find out what the issue is and why this sudden increase - we aren't using that much internet.
    Iain
    Got the same problem, see my seperate Post.
    Don't wish to hi-jack your post but how can BT be tackeled?
    It's hard to keep a daily check, I would say impossible!

  • Is the Core i7 processor comparable, much slower, or faster than the 2.8 Ghz core 2 duo from 2009?

    I am looking to get a new MacBook Air, but when looking at the prices I am seeing the MacBook Pro 13" for the same price and a lot more guts (RAM and Processor).  I am ok with spending the amount of money on the air if it means I get a computer that is like my iPad, which i love (flash based, snappy), but don't want it to be super slow.
    I am coming off of a 17" 2.8Ghz MacBook Pro from 2009.  I was happy with the speed and power of that machine.  The most taxing thing I did was make a complilation of family movies in iMovie and burned them with iDVD once in the 2 years of ownership. 
    I mostly browse the internet and compose written documents, and keynote presentations.
    I know my questions may seem stupid, but I don't know how significant the changes between i7 and Core 2 Duo are, so I ask the question:
    I am wondering if the processing power in the core i7 will be somewhat comparable, much slower, or faster than the 2.8 Ghz Core 2 Duo I had in my 2009 computer?
    Thanks for any help!!

    Hi brosephb,
    Like you I went through a similar comparison process. I bought the MacBook air 13" and up specced the processor and memory. I don't do anything taxing enough or frequently enough to NEED the extra power of the MacBook pro.
    I am overjoyed at my air. It's gorgeous, the way it wakes instantly, it's speed and it's portableness is so endearing that I just don't use my iPad anymore. I read numerous reviews on it and the overwhelming opinion was it's addictive ease of use because of it's slim, light and rapid waking. At work I can hold the air with one hand, open it rapidly at will. It's just great but it's made my iPad redundant (for me anyway).
    I see the new airs are even faster and I'm tempted to consider selling my 6 month old air and getting the new one, but, it runs a dream so I am happy to just be envious of the new one.
    In short, unless you need the power (for your work) go for the air. I'm looking at a new iMac to use as a home work station. For the price of a new air I can get an iMac that will swallow any task for a good few years to come. And my air will suffice as my mobile companion. However, that's just me spoiling myself as, at the moment, I have no teal need for another mac. I may get the cinema display for any long winded tasks, as the screen size will help with multiple tasking.
    A bit of a ramble, hope this is useful.

  • I have Lion, and I can't see my unread messages count in the dock, even after the preferences set up. I find the Lion Mail too complicated. Leopard was much easier and more simple to use. I only have one account& don't need all the rest. any suggestions

    I have Lion, and I can't see my unread messages count in the dock, even after the preferences set up.
    I find the Lion Mail too complicated. Leopard was much easier and more simple to use. I only have one account& don't need all the rest.
    any suggestions?

    weird.
    It's so frustrating, I got my Mac Book 5 days ago and I'm already having a discussion in the forum.
    Thank you so much for your prompt replies.
    It's past midnight here so I'd better get some rest...
    Good night captfred!

  • A SQL tuning issue-sql runs much slower in test than in production?

    Hi Buddies,
    I am working on a sql tuning issue. A sql runs much slower in test than in production.
    I compared the two explain plans in test and production
    seems in test, CBO refuses to use index SUBLEDGER_ENTRY_I2.
    we rebuile it and re-gether that index statistcs. run, still slow..
    I compared the init.ora parameters like hash_area_size, sort_area_size in test, they are same as production.
    I wonder if any expert friend can show some light.
    in production,
    SQL> set autotrace traceonly
    SQL> SELECT rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.onst_offst_cd,
    2 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.bkng_prd,
    3 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.systm_afflt_cd,
    4 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.jrnl_id,
    5 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.ntrl_accnt_cd,
    6 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.gnrl_ldgr_chrt_of_accnt_nm,
    7 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.lgl_entty_brnch_cd,
    8 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.crprt_melob_cd AS corp_mlb_cd,
    rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.onst_offst_cd, SUM (amt) AS amount
    9 10 FROM rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw
    11 WHERE rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.bkng_prd = '092008'
    12 AND rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.jrnl_id = 'RCS0002100'
    13 AND rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.systm_afflt_cd = 'SAFF01'
    14 GROUP BY rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.onst_offst_cd,
    15 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.bkng_prd,
    16 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.systm_afflt_cd,
    17 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.jrnl_id,
    18 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.ntrl_accnt_cd,
    19 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.gnrl_ldgr_chrt_of_accnt_nm,
    20 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.lgl_entty_brnch_cd,
    21 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.crprt_melob_cd,
    22 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.onst_offst_cd;
    491 rows selected.
    Execution Plan
    0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=130605 Card=218764 B
    ytes=16407300)
    1 0 SORT (GROUP BY) (Cost=130605 Card=218764 Bytes=16407300)
    2 1 VIEW OF 'RPT_HORIZON_SUBLEDGER_ENTRY_VW' (Cost=129217 Ca
    rd=218764 Bytes=16407300)
    3 2 SORT (UNIQUE) (Cost=129217 Card=218764 Bytes=35877296)
    4 3 UNION-ALL
    5 4 HASH JOIN (Cost=61901 Card=109382 Bytes=17719884)
    6 5 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'GNRL_LDGR_CHRT_OF_ACCNT'
    (Cost=2 Card=111 Bytes=3774)
    7 5 HASH JOIN (Cost=61897 Card=109382 Bytes=14000896
    8 7 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'SUBLEDGER_CHART_OF_ACC
    OUNT' (Cost=2 Card=57 Bytes=1881)
    9 7 HASH JOIN (Cost=61893 Card=109382 Bytes=103912
    90)
    10 9 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'HORIZON_LINE' (Cost=
    34 Card=4282 Bytes=132742)
    11 9 HASH JOIN (Cost=61833 Card=109390 Bytes=7000
    960)
    12 11 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'SUBLEDGE
    R_ENTRY' (Cost=42958 Card=82076 Bytes=3611344)
    13 12 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'SUBLEDGER_ENTRY_I
    2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=1069 Card=328303)
    14 11 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'HORIZON_SUBLEDGER_
    LINK' (Cost=14314 Card=9235474 Bytes=184709480)
    15 4 HASH JOIN (Cost=61907 Card=109382 Bytes=18157412)
    16 15 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'GNRL_LDGR_CHRT_OF_ACCNT'
    (Cost=2 Card=111 Bytes=3774)
    17 15 HASH JOIN (Cost=61903 Card=109382 Bytes=14438424
    18 17 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'SUBLEDGER_CHART_OF_ACC
    OUNT' (Cost=2 Card=57 Bytes=1881)
    19 17 HASH JOIN (Cost=61899 Card=109382 Bytes=108288
    18)
    20 19 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'HORIZON_LINE' (Cost=
    34 Card=4282 Bytes=132742)
    21 19 HASH JOIN (Cost=61838 Card=109390 Bytes=7438
    520)
    22 21 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'SUBLEDGE
    R_ENTRY' (Cost=42958 Card=82076 Bytes=3939648)
    23 22 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'SUBLEDGER_ENTRY_I
    2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=1069 Card=328303)
    24 21 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'HORIZON_SUBLEDGER_
    LINK' (Cost=14314 Card=9235474 Bytes=184709480)
    Statistics
    25 recursive calls
    18 db block gets
    343266 consistent gets
    370353 physical reads
    0 redo size
    15051 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    1007 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    34 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    1 sorts (memory)
    1 sorts (disk)
    491 rows processed
    in test
    SQL> set autotrace traceonly
    SQL> SELECT rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.onst_offst_cd,
    2 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.bkng_prd,
    3 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.systm_afflt_cd,
    4 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.jrnl_id,
    5 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.ntrl_accnt_cd,
    rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.gnrl_ldgr_chrt_of_accnt_nm,
    6 7 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.lgl_entty_brnch_cd,
    8 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.crprt_melob_cd AS corp_mlb_cd,
    9 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.onst_offst_cd, SUM (amt) AS amount
    10 FROM rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw
    11 WHERE rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.bkng_prd = '092008'
    12 AND rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.jrnl_id = 'RCS0002100'
    AND rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.systm_afflt_cd = 'SAFF01'
    13 14 GROUP BY rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.onst_offst_cd,
    15 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.bkng_prd,
    16 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.systm_afflt_cd,
    17 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.jrnl_id,
    18 rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.ntrl_accnt_cd,
    rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.gnrl_ldgr_chrt_of_accnt_nm,
    rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.lgl_entty_brnch_cd,
    rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.crprt_melob_cd,
    rpt_horizon_subledger_entry_vw.onst_offst_cd; 19 20 21 22
    no rows selected
    Execution Plan
    0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=92944 Card=708 Bytes
    =53100)
    1 0 SORT (GROUP BY) (Cost=92944 Card=708 Bytes=53100)
    2 1 VIEW OF 'RPT_HORIZON_SUBLEDGER_ENTRY_VW' (Cost=92937 Car
    d=708 Bytes=53100)
    3 2 SORT (UNIQUE) (Cost=92937 Card=708 Bytes=124962)
    4 3 UNION-ALL
    5 4 HASH JOIN (Cost=46456 Card=354 Bytes=60180)
    6 5 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'SUBLEDGER_CHART_OF_ACCOU
    NT' (Cost=2 Card=57 Bytes=1881)
    7 5 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=46453 Card=354 Bytes=48498)
    8 7 HASH JOIN (Cost=11065 Card=17694 Bytes=1362438
    9 8 HASH JOIN (Cost=27 Card=87 Bytes=5133)
    10 9 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'HORIZON_LINE' (Cos
    t=24 Card=87 Bytes=2175)
    11 9 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'GNRL_LDGR_CHRT_OF_
    ACCNT' (Cost=2 Card=111 Bytes=3774)
    12 8 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'HORIZON_SUBLEDGER_LI
    NK' (Cost=11037 Card=142561 Bytes=2566098)
    13 7 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'SUBLEDGER_EN
    TRY' (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=60)
    14 13 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SUBLEDGER_ENTRY_PK'
    (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Card=1)
    15 4 HASH JOIN (Cost=46456 Card=354 Bytes=64782)
    16 15 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'SUBLEDGER_CHART_OF_ACCOU
    NT' (Cost=2 Card=57 Bytes=1881)
    17 15 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=46453 Card=354 Bytes=53100)
    18 17 HASH JOIN (Cost=11065 Card=17694 Bytes=1362438
    19 18 HASH JOIN (Cost=27 Card=87 Bytes=5133)
    20 19 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'HORIZON_LINE' (Cos
    t=24 Card=87 Bytes=2175)
    21 19 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'GNRL_LDGR_CHRT_OF_
    ACCNT' (Cost=2 Card=111 Bytes=3774)
    22 18 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'HORIZON_SUBLEDGER_LI
    NK' (Cost=11037 Card=142561 Bytes=2566098)
    23 17 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'SUBLEDGER_EN
    TRY' (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=73)
    24 23 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SUBLEDGER_ENTRY_PK'
    (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Card=1)
    Statistics
    1134 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    38903505 consistent gets
    598254 physical reads
    60 redo size
    901 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    461 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    34 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    0 rows processed
    Thanks a lot in advance
    Jerry

    Hi
    Basically there are two kinds of tables
    - fact
    - lookup
    The number of records in a lookup table is usually small.
    The number of records in a fact table is usually huge.
    However, in test systems the number of records in a fact table is often also small.
    This results in different execution plans.
    I notice again you don't post version and platform info, and you didn't make sure your explain is properly idented
    Please read the FAQ to make sure it is properly idented.
    Also using the word 'buddies' is as far as I am concerned nearing disrespect and rudeness.
    Sybrand Bakker
    Senior Oracle DBA

  • I find using the iPhone / iPod size virtual keypad much easier to use with a stylus...as when an iPhone app is installed on the iPad.  Anyway to use the iPhone size keypad with all apps?

    I find using the iPhone / iPod size virtual keypad much easier to use with a stylus...as when an iPhone app is installed on the iPad.  Anyway to use the iPhone size keypad with all apps?

    I don't want the keyboard to become bigger.  Wish there was a way to always have the iPhone sized keypad available for use with any app.  When typing with fingers or stylus, the distance between keystrokes is SO much shorter and efficent on the iPhone keypad vs the "full size" iPad keyboard.
    I've heard that there will be some keyboard options when the new IOS comes out...wish this was one of them.
    Haven't looked yet, but is there a place you can recommend things such as this to Apple? 
    Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Wireless Printing from MacBook Pro and Windows 7 laptop through iMac

    I have looked everywhere I can think and have not found a solution to this problem: I just bought a 21.5" iMac and a Windows 7 laptop. I already had a 15" Macbook Pro. I have an HP C5280 printer that is now connected via USB to the iMac. All computer

  • Adobe Illustrator CC won't start!

    Adobe Illustrator CC won't start. It immediately crashes. Already uninstalled Wacom software, but that's not the problem, still doesn't start. I'm using the trial version of CC to see if everything works before i buy the software. I also have CS6 Des

  • SystemUIServer hogs CPU time-with details

    Like so many others, I am finding that SystemUIServer is often consuming between 90% and 100% of a CPU. I have tried various of the solutions offered in other threads, to no avail. And I believe I have more details than I have seen posted yet. First,

  • Merge several itunes libraries

    Hi All, I have multiple iTunes library on the same imac. I thought it would be the best way to manage a very large music library. Howver there are several drawbacks: newly applications purchased from an idevice are downloaded automatically in the lib

  • Reg: how to reverse the partial cleared items

    Hi Gurus 1) how to reverse the partial cleared items and user posted wrogly below: 2) actually amount received against invoice but she posted in f-02 insted of f-28 so how to reverse this