Multi Grip FR report Point of view

i have build multi grip FR report . i am using same user point of view for cost center dimension in both grip . when i run report and change the cost center at All it doesnt change the cost center in both the grip .
Do i need to make any setting changes to make it effective ? buf if i go to individual point of view and change cost center then it works fine
can any body help me to resolve this
thanks

How is the pov selected in both the reports? Are you using grid POV?
Regards
Celvin
http://www.orahyplabs.com

Similar Messages

Report for Paid Invoices from AP Point of view.

Hello Gurus,
I am looking for a Report from SAP which will give me the Paid Invoices Information from Accounts Payable Point of view for a Particular Period which should cover the below information...
Entity
Invoice #
Invoice Date
Vendor Name
Invoice Amount
Currency
NET terms - NT30, NT 00 like wise
Net due date -
Paid Date
Document Types
Document Number
Please let me know the Standard Report Transaction Code ASAP.Quick response will be appreciated.
Thanks,
B

Hi:
Refer to FBL1N - Display/Change Line Items in accounts payable.
Select vendor accout,co.code,cleared items on a particular date and execute.
From change layout (Ctrl+F8), you can select payment terms,Net due date,account type,account document
Please let me know if you need more information.
Assign points if useful.
Regards
Sridhar M

Problem with Periods' point of view on Financial Reporting Studio

Hy all,
i have a problem on some reports: i fix Periods' Point of View on Financial Reporting Studio signing in with Admin user. I do this to let other users see just a part of the dimension structure on workspace,but when i open workspace signing in with a generic user i can't see any changing: user can see all elements of the dimension. Otherwise If i sign on workspace with admin user i can see the Periods'POV i have fixed on reporting studio previously. So do you have any idea on what i can do to solve this problem?

Hi,
Could u plz clarify your problem bit more.
Are you facing a problem while running the reports through work space..? While running the reports, is affected generic user getting a POV window..? If you are concerning about hierarchy that you select through POV window then It might be possible that POV might have got corrupted for that generic user and in that case we can delete the POV and set up the new POV again for that user.

Reports User Point of View Question

I created a report that has two grids and the databases are both essbase cubes and have the same dimension names. I am working with Hyperion Reports 9.3. I wanted to link the User Point of View, so that all the user had to do was click on:
1. Period (ie-Apr)
2. Company Code
3. FiscalYear (ie-FY10)
What the Preview User Point of View shows is a drop-down box at the top that has the user select each database connection and change the POV for these dimensions. I'd like to not do that. I'd like the User POV to only have to be selected once.
Note: At a previous job, I am pretty sure I was able to do this without having to change the User POV for each db connection. I know there were two connections but didn't have to change the POV twice. I will provide additional details if needed.
Thanks, T

I'm not sure if that will work for me. I already have the 2nd grid hidden from view and there isn't an option to "pull" the POV from another grid that I can see. I even tried merge equivalent prompts in the User Preferences in Workspace but I think that is for prompts only, not user POV.

Financial Reporting: Base members of Current Point of View for Entity

How do you typically handle reports in which you'd like to show all base members of the current point of view, but also allow the user to select a base entity?
Example A: Base members of Current Point of View for Entity
User selects a base entity: report errors
User selects a parent: report functions as expected and shows base entities
Example B: Base members of Current Point of View for Entity (Inclusive)
User selects a base entity: report functions as expected and shows the base entity
User selects a parent: report shows base entities (as expected), but also shows the parent entity (which we do not want to see)
I think the last case listed is what we want, but is there any way to just show the base entities? Like an advanced suppression option or something I'm missing.
Thanks.

Unfortunately, we don't have anything that uniquely identifies our base entities (close, but not all of them). However, the report does work as desired by using the following for entity, set in the advanced properties:
Base members of Current Point of View for Entity (Inclusive) AND Bottom of hierarchy Entity
This will allow the user to select either A) parent or B) base entity from the hierarchy and the report will show either A) base entities of the parent (not the parent) or B) the base entity.
Not sure why this works and all the other things attempted did not, but as long as it works. Also tried conditional formatting on Level, but that always threw a level 0 (for both base and parent).

CLIENT point of view

I am a SAP BW consultant just started and willing to learn from Other expereiences.
I want to know certain things which might have occured to so many of you
1. In an ERP environment, How SAP BW migration from other External Data Warehouses will benefit to the Customer in terms of Improving his Profitablilty or Increasing the Stock Index in the MACRO level.
2. Do we have a comparison statement kind of a thing vis a vis Other ERP tools which strongly suggest SAP BW has an edge over others.
3. How one can convince the Client in case if he agrees to have a Netweaver 2004S and BW implementation but still wants to use the Other Multi Legacy Systems Synergistically for some reasons or other / simply got used for so long
which really impact the scope of Design and Implementations for both the Service Provider as well as the Client.
4. I really want to play with the Data available in the Landscape to effectively make best use of it and project to the Client a Transformation which he can expect from Multi Dimenstion. Show me the direction.
5. Suggest me a logical way to only Understand SAP BW without any diversions so as to Concentrate working on the SAP BW environment and also appreciate the Client Point of View or Satisfaction.
Thanks in advance.

Answers to your questions:
1. BW is data warehouse tool which has reporting and analytic capabilities. It also has the capability of engaging SEM with it. Which means that BW is a veery powerful toll for a company to use if they want to do a better analysis on past data and help top executies make dicision and also with the help of SEM there capability of forcasting is improved to a great extent. Accurate forcasting is the key to better business and high profits.
2. It really depends on the need.CAgnos needs lot of memory as it copies the data in the front end for more flexibilty in reporting. SAP BW is good with respect to SAP R/3. Other areas (Interface with other sources) It is evolving in better manner.Other Data warehousing tools more maintenance man power and big team to implimenting. And all components like sourcing , Configuring and reporting does not depend on single product. BW has all the components available with in it.Depends on customer needs you have decide.
3. Not sure abt it.
4. Data modeling is a SAP course(TBW30) on its own and cannot be explained in a one liner. If you have a specific case then may be we can have a look at it.
5. I would suggest you go through the SAP trainign material . That is a step by step guide to you.
- Guru
Reward points for helpful answers

Client Merge! precautions to be taken from BW point of view

Hi,
We are in a process of merging two clients in R/3 which are typical source systems for BW!
What are the steps that we should take care of while the client merge is on from R/3 side.
these two clients are ofcourse very important for BW system as almost all for everydata load the extraction logic in FM to the ABAP routine in selection of infopacakge is different!
in a scenario such as this, what are the things that should i make a note from BW point of view?
Raj

Hi,
1.Internal table with header line will not support in ECC 6.0 for that u need to create internal table and work area using TYPES.
2.Mostly u need to do some PATCH WORK for the STANDARD programmes.
Patch work in the sense for SPAU objects in Mysap is there any code written by client(INSERT {....END INSERT....}) this type of code u need to add in ECC 6.0 code....
3.Mostly u have to resolve EPC(Extended program check) errors.
In that u will find so many type of errors...Field attribute errors,Perform interface errors,Obsolete stetement errors,....etc.
4.First thing u need to what r the SCOPE and OUT OF SCOPE in your upgradation.
5.If u find any Fmodules obsolete...U just press F1 on that Fmodule it will show which function module can useful instead of that obsolete one...
6.If they want UNI CODE compatiable .....
EX Report...
Go to the attributes of the report...
There u can c a check box to check UNI CODE Errors...
U have to resolve these errors also...
After doing all these things u have to show 0 errors on CODE INSPECTOR fro each n every object...
Thats t as per my knowledge...
Regards,
Kishore Reddy.

Reporting point installation issues

OK I have inherited a SCCM SCOM environment and all DBs including WSUS are installed in the same instance. Yuck. I made a fuss to the DB Admins and they said Oh Its fine, you just need to install seperate SSRS instances and it will work, look
see here is an article stating so.
So I have installed seperate SSRS instances and am trying to get the reporting point to install with no luck. Anyone have the steps involved in getting this working? When I go to add the reporting point no SQL instance is showing up to select
from. Please help. Thanks kindly.

Hi,
This problem might be related to firewall. You could have a look on the following thread.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/4479e73e-8a19-4c7e-9418-b36770656b9b/sccm-2012-reporting-point-server-instance-blank
Best Regards,
Joyce
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

GR with backflush not for reporting point logic with autom. GR option

Dear Experts,
While doing backflashing though MFBF we are getting following error
"GR with backflush not for reporting point logic with autom. GR option"
We have maintained 5 production version for this material while calling with first production version we are getting the error.
Rate routing & BOM maintanied for the FERT material
Thanks

Did you check the BackFlash option are actuvated in the following places ?
1. In the Rate routing, the backflush indicator is set in the component assignment.-CA22
2. In the material master record, the backflush indicator has the characteristic "Always backflush".-MRP3
3. In the material master record, the backflush indicator has the characteristic "Work center decides", the indicator being set in the work center.-CR21-Basic Data View .
4.Goto-MM02-MRP4 View -Select the PV-Goto Details -Check particularly this production version REM Allowed or not
5.You should use REM-Profile -0004/0003 where RP and Auto GR with RP at last Back Flashing Activated .
6.Check Rate Routing Operation Control Key -Auto GR with indicator Confirmation required
Regards
JH
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Jun 22, 2010 11:19 AM

Error reading reporting point information

Dear All,
While i m doing backflashing with the tcode mfbf recving a error messge in reporting piont this -
Error reading reporting point information kindlly update me how can i resolve this
regards
pritpal

Dear pritpal.
Check the rem profile at MRP view of Material master (MM02). the correct profile has been selected sotaht it allows the RP backflush.
To check Rem profile allows RP back flush at OPS2.
For Milestone confirmation check wth controlkey which has assigned at Routing operation (CA02)
For Product cost collecter check with KKF6N.
Regards
Pradeep

Regarding "z"tractions IN mm point of view

hi sapguru
i just want to know what is Z tractions or what role of Z tractions play in implimentaions,pls explain in MM POINT OF view
REGARD'S
SANDEEP

Hi,
What ever is not possible thru standard SAP we have to develop Z programmes for that and to run this Z programmrs Z transactions are required.( provided that required data is available in tables)
For example C form tracking or purchase order ammendment is not in standard SAP for thsi we have to develop Z prog.
Other example is when there is a requirement of report which is not in std SAP we are creatibng reports thru ABAP for this Z Prog are reqd and to run this Z Prog Z transactions are reqd.
Regards
Kedar Kulkarni
Edited by: Kedar Kulkarni on Feb 5, 2008 12:03 PM

Filter in User point of view

Hi ,
I have set a filter Custom ( Just two values) for Version which is set as user point of view .
I can see only two values in the FR studio for that report .
But i have following issues.
1) When other users/developers login with there credentials the custom filter is not getting applied . That is the other developer can see all the values.
2) When i run the report in workspace the custom filter does not get set . It shows all the values even though in the design the Custom filter is set.
please let me know how i can resolve the above issue and is critical for me .
Thanks and Regards
Vijaya

I know what you are referring to. What you did was create a filter only for your user id and not for the report. That option in the FR Studio is very misleading, it makes it appear as if the report was limited to those 2 members. It is only for the user id of the person developing the report when you preview the report.
What you can do is put Version in the Grid POV. There you can limit the members users will see when they run the report. Unfortunately, it's not very pretty and a bit confusing for users.

YTD as of Current Point of View

I am at a new company and on books and reports I was able to easily set up a POV as YTD as of Current Point of View. In this case, the user can pick the month dynamically and they would get their YTD numbers. My question is, how can I select/create this member? In my last company, it was listed right in member selection, so I'm not sure if I need to create the member myself or not. I'm thinking not, but I've been surprised before. Any tips for this?

looks like i'd need to set up the Dynamic Time Series in Planning to start this process.

Preview User Point of View in workspace

Hi All,
Hope you are all doing great.
the Financial Report Preview user point of view in the workspace split into two where the buttons window displaying in large
How to make the User point of view preview like this below?
Regards,
VT

Hi VT,
Not always true… part of the configuration is to add the url in the trusted sites. If one url is in the trusted site and the other is not then it may be the issue.
Cheers,
Thanos

Point of View Problem

HI,
Users are not able to set Point of View for FR. Even after deleting the Point of View they are not able to set it. We spoke to Oracle but didn't get any satisfactory Answer.
I have also see this problem when users moves from One Machine to another machine and try to open Reports. Then POV getting corupt.
If someone can help in this.
Regards,
Vishal

Hi,
Could u plz clarify your problem bit more.
Are you facing a problem while running the reports through work space..? While running the reports, is affected generic user getting a POV window..? If you are concerning about hierarchy that you select through POV window then It might be possible that POV might have got corrupted for that generic user and in that case we can delete the POV and set up the new POV again for that user.

Multi Grip FR report Point of view

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for