Multiple Account Assignment - distribute sequentially

Users create a po item with multiple account assignments, distribute on a quantity basis(distribution), and distribute sequentially (partial invoices).  Goods Receipt Indicator, GR-Non-val, and gr based IV are off.
when using miro to post an invoice, the first suggested account distribution is for the entire amount.  on the account distribution subscreen, the amount is modified to reflect the partial invoicing, the amount/quantity are recalculated, but the distribution remains proportional . 
Po 1, Item 1 qty=1000, unit price=$1. account assignment=distribute on a quantity basis, partial invoice= distiribute in sequence, account assignment #1 qty=900, account assignment #2 qty=100.
attempt to create a partial invoice via MIRO ($100).
MIRO proposes $1000 and on the account assignment subscreen shows account assignment #1=900/$900 and account assignment#2=100/$100.  obviously attempting to invoice the full amount of the po.
If you change the quantity/amount on the subscreen to 100/$100, you would expect all to go to account assignment#1 since partial invoice is 'distribute sequentially'.  However, the subscreen 'checks' with 90/$90 and 10/$10.
Any ideas?

Hi,
The valuation of the purchase order item will  take place at the time of invoice verification.
During goods reciept thr r no accounting documents gets generated, at the time of invoice receipt u can specify cost center and GL accounts for posting.
If partial delivery is done for the PO, then during GR the system cant estimate the qty to be posted to individual cost centres, so only GR is non valuated and during invoice reciept u can split the qty among individual cost centers.

Similar Messages

  • Revoked SES with account assignment distributed by quantity cannot be modified or deleted

    Hi All
    I have users who are posting service entry sheet with the account assignment distributed
    on a quantity basis across multiple maintenance orders.  The acceptance works perfectly but we are having problems if a correction or cancellation is required.
    The service acceptance can be revoked successfully but afterwards it is not possible to change the service quantity or to delete the service entry sheet.  When we try we receive an ABAP runtime error:
    Runtime Errors         COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW
    Exception              CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW
    Date and Time          08.07.2014 14:25:12
    Short text
         Overflow during the arithmetical operation (type P) in program
    What happened?
         Error in the ABAP Application Program
         The current ABAP program "CL_EX_MMSRV_ACC_DIST_SAP======CP" had to be
          terminated because it has
         come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    What can you do?
         Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
         To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
         administrator.
         Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
         at and manage termination messages, and you can also
         keep them for a long time.
    Error analysis
         An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
         The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW', was not
          caught in
         procedure "IF_EX_MMSRV_ACC_DIST_SAP~DISTRIBUTE_ACC_ASSIGNMENTS" "(METHOD)", nor
          was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
         Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
         exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
         The reason for the exception is:
         An overflow was discovered in an ongoing arithmetical operation with
         operands of type P. Possible causes are:
         1. The result field of type P is too small for the result.
         2. The result or a intermediate result has more than 31 decimal places.
    This problem does not occur if I run the same scenario any of the following variations so I'm confident the problem is related to the account assignment distribution by quantity:
    Single account assignment
    Distributed account assignment via percentage
    No service acceptance/revoke has been posted
    There are ways to get around the problem but I'm trying to find a SAP Note that may be relevant.  I haven't had any luck yet.  Does this problem ring a bell with anybody who might be able to point me towards an appropriate note?
    Thanks
    Robyn

    Hi,
    Kindly refer the below OSS Note, which explains the reason and correction for the error which you are facing.
    1715475 - MAA2: ML81N/MIRO: false postings for Service PO

  • Multiple Account Assignment Distribution by Percentage in EBP

    Hi Gurus,
    We are in SRM 4 SP13  and ECC 4.6C ,Classic Scenario.The SC creates a PR in the backend and from that  PO subsequently.
    When we are creating a SC with Multiple Account Assignment  and Distribution by Percentage to different cost centres   the PR created  with
    Distribution :  Distribution by percentage  and
    Partial Invoice : Distribute in Sequence. This is for materials
    But for Services it is created as
    Distribution :  Distribution by percentage  and
    Partial Invoice :Distribute Proportionally.
    For services Partial Invoice is working fine and for materials it is Picking "Distribute in Sequence"
    Is this a standard behaviour  or any thing to be changed .Please let me know.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Rajesh

    Hi there,
    Standard SRM Hardcodes the partial invoice indicator to Progressive when          
    sending POs to SAP in the Classice Scenario:                                                                               
    SPOOL_PO_READ_BAPI_EXPORTS hard codes the value of po_items-part_inv              
    to 1 that is equivalent to "Progressive fill-up" in R/3 POs & REQ.                                                                               
    It is not possible to create from EBP to backend some PO-documents with           
    multiple account assignment and partial invoice indicator = 2 (which is           
    proportional distribution because there is no possibility to set this             
    indicator on the account assignment creen in EBP and theris no Badi               
    to do it so far. This is a missing functionality from SAP.                                                                               
    You still could use LIV with partial invoice indicator= 1 and then you            
    can change to partial invoice propotional in backend manually.                    
    This is not comfortable but it is possible so far.                                
    You can see in the following code from the mentioned Function how Service and material documents are treated differently
    ======================================                                                                               
    set distr. indicator only for the dummy item for services         
    for material items and the service lines                          
    it is derived from distribution type in EBP                       
        IF next > 1.                                                    
          IF po_items-item_cat = '9' OR                                 
             po_items-item_cat = '1' .                                  
            po_items-distrib = '2'.    "prozentuale Verteilung          
          ENDIF.                                                        
          po_items-part_inv = '1'.      <<<<       Hard Coded to "1"    
          MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.                                
        ELSE.                                                           
          CLEAR po_items-distrib.    "prozentuale Verteilung            
          MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.                                
        ENDIF.                                                          
      ENDLOOP.                                                                               
    CHECK NOT po_items[] IS INITIAL.                                                                               
    ======================================         
    Or possibly use Badi BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK
    Hope this points you in the right direction.
    Regards,
    Matthew

  • Multiple Account Assignment in Service PO and Seq No of Acc Assgnmt in FI

    Hi Experts,
    We have created a Service PO with Multiple Account Assignment.  The issue is Seq. No. Acc. ***. in BSEG-ZEKKN is showing as 01 for the line item.  But in EKKN-ZEKKN for the same line item is showing as 02.  Is it that the Sequence Number of Account Assignment in table EKKN and field ZEKKN flow to ZEKKN field in BSEG?
    Or is that BSEG-ZEKKN is posted from FI Document itself?  Can anybody explain the logic?

    BSEG - ZEKKN field is always defaulted to 1 in FI document, unless you manually override and change it to something else. Since all FI documents are with reference to purchase order and line item, system cannot determine automatically the sequential number of account assignment which needs to be entered for a particular combination of PO and line item in the FI document.
    So it is always defaulted as 1 and does not flow from Purchase order to FI document. Infact the field I believe is displayed only in case of transactions like downpayments which require the account assignment in addition to PO and line item. For all others , if there is an account assignment sequence then it is defaulted as 1.
    Also see OSS note 204252 which mentions that for multiple account assignments within the same PO and line item no FI documents get generated.
    Thanks

  • Multiple Account assignment with cost distribution value error

    Hello Experts,
    We are facing the below issue,
    We are trying to create Limit SC with MAA cost center with cost distribution "By Value". we distribute the total value to 5 cost centers. when we try to order the SC, system is not allowing us to order, we got the error message "Multiple account assignment only with percentage less than 100%".
    Please advise how to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Santhosh Kumar.G

    Hi
    Check this OSS notes : 1644804
    Regards
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Partial invoice with multiple account assignment

    I'm using PO with multiple account assignment with distribution by percentage and proportional distribution for partial invoice.
    When i post invoice verification for this kind of orders the amount and quantity field in PO item are closed for update and no automatic proportional distribution has been performed.
    The only possibility to update amount in case of partial invoice is to update amount of each account assignment manually (using account assignment button).
    Why the amount and quantity fields are closed for update?
    How i can post partial invoice for multiple account assignment order without manual distribution of changed amounts among different account assignments items?
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks Charlie.
    I am aware of that. But do we have that "partial invoice" field where we can select teh distribution as proportionate or sequence.
    My POs item are having around 30 to 45 account assignments. In that case it is not possible to manual distribute the amount.
    Please advise.
    Thanks,

  • What is multiple account assignment??

    Hi Experts,
    Kindly clear my doubts.
    1) What is Multiple Account Assignment in PO ?
    2) If i have ordered 100 ea of material, can i split 50 ea for cost center (K) and 50 ea for project (P) with this multiple account assignment in PO?
    Regards,
    Prasath

    Hi,
    I hope multiple account assignment is only possible for different cost centers and not against project.Mostly this will be used for consumable material only.
    When specifying multiple account assignment for an item, you must consider the following points:
    How is the net value of a PO item to be distributed (apportioned) to the individual account assignment items?
    The costs can be allocated on a quantity or percentage basis (for example, 10 pieces or 10% of the order value to cost center 100).
    How are the costs to be apportioned if only a part of the ordered quantity has been delivered and invoiced?
    In this case, the accounts are charged with the invoiced amount of the partial delivery. For each purchase order item with multiple account assignments, you can specify whether the cost allocation is carried out proportionally or on a progressive fill-up basis.
    If you allocate the costs proportionally, the invoiced amount is distributed equally among the accounts.
    If you allocate the costs on a progressive fill-up basis, the invoiced amount is allocated to the individual account assignment items one after the other. In this case, costs are allocated to account assignment item 2, for example, only when item 1 has received its full allotment, and so on. This process continues with each successive partial invoice until the full invoice amount is reached.
    Fo further details you can refer
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ides/helpdata/en/fd/45b9c89d6411d189b60000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Prabu

  • Multiple account assignment POs shows in IR screen lesser amount

    Hi Experts,
            I have one query regarding Multiple account assignment POs (ex :5 pos), my user trying to post the invoice doc in this lesser amount shown in invoice document (calculated the all 5 pos amount  manaually around 10,000 INR but in invoice posting time it shows 9800 INR only). This is Frame work order po and GR is Non valuated.
    Please help how we can handle this issue.
    Regards
    SAP MM

    Hi Ramesh,
          Thanks for your reply, it is distributed based on % basis, i seen in pos its 99.6% shows in some line items it shows 100.1% in another line items.
    I observed in  Tcode OMR6 tolerence limit for compamy code,in this the tolerance key "BR" and upper Tolerance limit 0.50% there is no lower limit.
    The mentioned Tolerance key "BR"- Percentage OPUn variance (IR before GR)
    I provided the workaround for  this it is to manual change the price while doing the invoice and respective diffence in price of GR/IR will be posted at month end as per programme run for variant at each month end.
    Please suggest me if any thing wrong ion this,how can i suggestt o my user.
    please reply asap.
    Regards
    SAP MM

  • Customizing for multiple account assignment in OME9

    Hello,
    We want to create a specific account category with different account assignment fields (cost center, WBS, order, etc).
    This account category will be used for PO items with single account assignment or multiple account assignment.
    One more information is this specific account category will be used only for PO replicated from Supplier Relationship Management. This means PO document type will not be created directly in R/3.
    We use ECC6 with EhP4 with business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 active, so we make MAA for GR valuated.
    According to those elements, iI would like to have confirmation regarding customizing we implemented, especially for fields:
    - "Indicator: Account assignment screen" populated with value '2' (Multiple account assignment)
    - "Distribution" empty (Single account assignment),
    - "Partial Invoice" populated with value '2' (Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities proportionately).
    While creating PO in SRM and after replication in R/3, cost distribution is done correctly for item with multiple account assignment (Account Assignment tab with Partial Inv. =  "Distribute Proportionately" and Distribution = 1, 2 or 3, depending on cost distribution type chosen) whereas for item with single account assignment, Partial Inv. is "Derive from Account Assignment Category" and Distribution is "Single Account Assignment Category").
    So, it seems OK. Nevertheless, i would like to have confirmation values i gave with above fields are correct in order to not have to change them later, i mean after PO were created, if problems occured.
    Thank you for your help.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

    Hello,
    During PO replication from SRM to R/3, customizing from OME9 is not read and "Partial invoice indicator" is always defaulted to "1" when item has a multiple account assignment.
    This behaviour can be overwritten by implementing:
    - either BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI for method BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI,
    - or BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI for method BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND.
    So, no need to take care of OME9 customizing.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • GR/IR Rounding Logic for Multiple Account Assignment

    We have activated business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 (EHP4 release 604), GR valuated. When choosing Distribution on quantity basis and distribute partial inv proportionally, the MIGO postings are different from the MIRO postings. For example, we have a quantity of 12 that we allocate to two different cost centers 33.3 / 66.7 %. We receive a partial qty of 5. MIGO distributes the quantity 1.665 / 3.335, respectively. However, MIRO distributes the quantity 1.666 / 3.333 respectively. Since MIRO is supposed to accept the MIGO quantities and amounts, why is the percentage allocation different?  Is there a way to make the percentages equal for MIGO / MIRO? Modification of the percentage field (VPROZ) in the PO to more than 1 decimal is not an option.
    Example
        PO (quantity-based distribution, partial inv is proportional: Receive partial Qty 5 of total 12
                             Net Value            Qty              Percen           MIGO           MIRO
        Item:            9,600.00 USD    12.000 pc     100.00       4,340.00      4,340.00
        Account 1:  3,200.00 USD      4.000 pc        33.3         1,446.67      1,446.96
        Account 2:  6,400.00 USD      8.000 pc        66.7         2,893.33      2,893.04
    The small difference of $0.29 for this example is inconsequential, but for larger quantieis it will have a greater impact on the account allocation.

    U set or U dont set system will flag the GR non valuated once u assign multiple account assignment.
    But SAP is coming up with GR valuated for Multiple account assignment in enhancement package 4.
    Check out EP4 Presentation at........
    https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/erp-ehp
    Venkat

  • Hard Question:   Item-Based Approval for Multiple Account Assignment?

    Hi Vadim and community,
    Possibly.. this is my hardest question for you.
    We need to implement Item-Based Workflow Approval.  The CC Owner should approve only the items assigned to his/her CC.    We'll do this reading R3(CO) data.
    Thats not the problem.
    The problem is:  I need to use Multiple Account Assignment.  I'll distribute one time in 3 o more CC.   Is it possible to have an CC-Based Workflow Approval ?   I mean, The CC owner should approve partly the item assigned to his/her CC.
    Anybody knows something ?
    Thanks for your reply !!! =)
    Regards,
    Diego

    Hi Diego,
    In my understanding you want to define one or several level of approval depending on the CC assignement on each item.
    lets take an example:
    CC1 owner approver1, CC2 owner approver2 and CC3 approver3
    For a SC:
    -Item 1: 20% on CC1, and 80% on CC2
    -Item 2: 20% on CC1, and 60% on CC2, and 20% on CC3
    Then in the item level BADI, you'll define:
    -Item1:
    Level1 ==> approver1
    Level2 ==> approver2
    -Item2:
    Level1 ==> approver1
    Level2 ==> approver2
    Level3 ==> approver3
    I had this requirement on a project, and the hard part was not the BADI implementation, but the CC owner link with the SRM users (cause all approvers have to be declared on the SRM, and integrated in the SRM org plan).
    Regards.
    Vadim

  • Multiple Account Assignment at the time of Good Receipt for one line item

    Sap Members.     
      We have some contracts with cost center distributions that the exact amount is not known.  These Blanket Orders require a receiving confirmation.then only we can conclude the cost center, If we create one line item with total amount of contract to one cost center, is there a way can we distribute this cost to the different cost centers at the moment receiving the goods
    Any help will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Nick

    Please Check SAP Notes - Oss Notes
    With multiple acct. assignment, enter GR non-val. or cancel GR
    Message no. 06417
    Diagnosis
    In the case of PO items assigned to more than one account, instead of valuation being carried out at the time of goods receipt, the relevant materials are not valuated until the invoice data is entered into the system.
    Procedure
    •     Set the indicator for non-valuated goods receipts
    or
    •     Cancel the GR indicator.
    OSS-Notes.                              -
    Version: 5        -
    Validity: valid since 12.04.2007
    Note 204252 - Valuated goods receipt for multiple account assignment
    Summary
    Symptom
    You cannot use the valuated goods receipt function in combination with multiple account assignment.
    Other terms
    EKPO-WEUNB, screen 0113, ME21, purchase order, 06417, 06 417
    Reason and Prerequisites
    We have not implemented this function since users who post goods receipts would have to determine the distribution to individual account assignment items during  partial deliveries. Generally, users cannot or should not determine this.
    An automatic distribution also causes problems and is also not implemented due to technical reasons

  • Down payment with multiple account assignment PO

    Dear Experts,
    While posting down payment request through transaction F -47 with
    reference to purchase order we are getting below given error.
    In that purchase order we have given
    multiple account assignment i.e. multiple cost centers (e.g. Cost center A  50% cost center B 10% Cost Center  C 40% i.e. distribution by %)
    but
    system is flagging message
    Item 00010 of purch. document 4500024875 contains no suitable account
    assignment
    Message no. ME717
    What will be the possible cause?
    regards,
    Abhijit

    Hi,
    In the request f-27 tr.code give the purchase order which item you want to give ie., for above said example 10 is a line item of 4500024875 - purchase order and beside you have to mention
    10(lineitem) 4500024875 (purchase order) 2009 (year)
    and system will take that request against the above purchase order.
    Regards,
    satish

  • GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

    Hi,
    We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
    We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
    But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
    We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
    The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
    It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
    The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
    This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
    But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
    Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
    Regards,
    Srivatsan

    Hi Srivatsan ?
    In ECC, you have a configuration point :
    Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
    Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • ERROR WHILE POSTING MIRO FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT (ASSET)

    Hi Guys,
    We created  a PO for asset with multiple account assignment. And we immediately do IR instead of GR.
    While doing IR it is giving error
    1) Quantity delivered is zero - Warning message
    2) Account 245350 requires a Transaction Type or is Invalid - Error message
    what may be the problem. how can we eliminate and post it
    Regards
    palani

    Hi,
    I would assume the G/L account you used was not properly set up.  Did you get the same problem if you try to change to another G/L account?  Perhaps, get your FI specialist to look into this G/L account-related error and verify it.
    Cheers,
    HT

Maybe you are looking for

  • Headphone jack not working iMac 10.5.8

    While playing to the headphones the plug was pulled out of the headphone jack. Sound plays through the external speakers but when the headphones are plugged in they are not recognized. Tried a different pair of headphones and they did not work. Both

  • Multiple Contribute Admin Accounts

    Hey, I am trying to use Contribute to edit a Template file made in Dreamweaver for an HTML email. I know its not the best way of doing things, but all the office need to do is change the text, so its working just fine except for CSS. I have found tha

  • Dropbox appindicator is not working in Gnome shell

    Hello, I have installed "dropbox" package from AUR and also "gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-git"  (and it's dependencies which are libindicator and libappindicator and some other packages) from AUR too. My appindicators are now working except for

  • Driver for DVD rom drive for dv6308nr

    Does anyone know where to find the driver for an HP laptop dv6308nr cd/dvd rom drive?  I looked it up on the site and it isn't listed under the available drivers.  Maybe I am missing it????

  • General hardware monitoring on SCOM 2012 R2

    Hello everybody. Sorry for maybe common question, i'm absolutely newbie in SCOM. I'm standing at task of monitoring basic servers counters - Memory utilization, disk free space & CPU utilization. After reading some articles about SCOM architecture I