Multiple Account Assignment Distribution by Percentage in EBP

Hi Gurus,
We are in SRM 4 SP13  and ECC 4.6C ,Classic Scenario.The SC creates a PR in the backend and from that  PO subsequently.
When we are creating a SC with Multiple Account Assignment  and Distribution by Percentage to different cost centres   the PR created  with
Distribution :  Distribution by percentage  and
Partial Invoice : Distribute in Sequence. This is for materials
But for Services it is created as
Distribution :  Distribution by percentage  and
Partial Invoice :Distribute Proportionally.
For services Partial Invoice is working fine and for materials it is Picking "Distribute in Sequence"
Is this a standard behaviour  or any thing to be changed .Please let me know.
Thanks in Advance.
Rajesh

Hi there,
Standard SRM Hardcodes the partial invoice indicator to Progressive when          
sending POs to SAP in the Classice Scenario:                                                                               
SPOOL_PO_READ_BAPI_EXPORTS hard codes the value of po_items-part_inv              
to 1 that is equivalent to "Progressive fill-up" in R/3 POs & REQ.                                                                               
It is not possible to create from EBP to backend some PO-documents with           
multiple account assignment and partial invoice indicator = 2 (which is           
proportional distribution because there is no possibility to set this             
indicator on the account assignment creen in EBP and theris no Badi               
to do it so far. This is a missing functionality from SAP.                                                                               
You still could use LIV with partial invoice indicator= 1 and then you            
can change to partial invoice propotional in backend manually.                    
This is not comfortable but it is possible so far.                                
You can see in the following code from the mentioned Function how Service and material documents are treated differently
======================================                                                                               
set distr. indicator only for the dummy item for services         
for material items and the service lines                          
it is derived from distribution type in EBP                       
    IF next > 1.                                                    
      IF po_items-item_cat = '9' OR                                 
         po_items-item_cat = '1' .                                  
        po_items-distrib = '2'.    "prozentuale Verteilung          
      ENDIF.                                                        
      po_items-part_inv = '1'.      <<<<       Hard Coded to "1"    
      MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.                                
    ELSE.                                                           
      CLEAR po_items-distrib.    "prozentuale Verteilung            
      MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.                                
    ENDIF.                                                          
  ENDLOOP.                                                                               
CHECK NOT po_items[] IS INITIAL.                                                                               
======================================         
Or possibly use Badi BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK
Hope this points you in the right direction.
Regards,
Matthew

Similar Messages

  • Multiple Account Assignment -- Distribution

    Hi,
    Details:
    SRM 4.0 system.
    SRM SERVER 500
    when filling in the multiple account assignment, the user can choose the distribution type (percentage, value, quantity). We don't want the users to select a distribution by value. So is it possible to remove this option from the drop down box?
    Best Regards,
    Tom

    Hi Tom,
    You can change it in program LBBP_PDH_ACCF35.
    Here you can see text-024 (value) is appended to the table.
    Just comment this table append.
    Best regards,
    Laurent.

  • Multiple Account assignment with cost distribution value error

    Hello Experts,
    We are facing the below issue,
    We are trying to create Limit SC with MAA cost center with cost distribution "By Value". we distribute the total value to 5 cost centers. when we try to order the SC, system is not allowing us to order, we got the error message "Multiple account assignment only with percentage less than 100%".
    Please advise how to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Santhosh Kumar.G

    Hi
    Check this OSS notes : 1644804
    Regards
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Customizing for multiple account assignment in OME9

    Hello,
    We want to create a specific account category with different account assignment fields (cost center, WBS, order, etc).
    This account category will be used for PO items with single account assignment or multiple account assignment.
    One more information is this specific account category will be used only for PO replicated from Supplier Relationship Management. This means PO document type will not be created directly in R/3.
    We use ECC6 with EhP4 with business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 active, so we make MAA for GR valuated.
    According to those elements, iI would like to have confirmation regarding customizing we implemented, especially for fields:
    - "Indicator: Account assignment screen" populated with value '2' (Multiple account assignment)
    - "Distribution" empty (Single account assignment),
    - "Partial Invoice" populated with value '2' (Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities proportionately).
    While creating PO in SRM and after replication in R/3, cost distribution is done correctly for item with multiple account assignment (Account Assignment tab with Partial Inv. =  "Distribute Proportionately" and Distribution = 1, 2 or 3, depending on cost distribution type chosen) whereas for item with single account assignment, Partial Inv. is "Derive from Account Assignment Category" and Distribution is "Single Account Assignment Category").
    So, it seems OK. Nevertheless, i would like to have confirmation values i gave with above fields are correct in order to not have to change them later, i mean after PO were created, if problems occured.
    Thank you for your help.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

    Hello,
    During PO replication from SRM to R/3, customizing from OME9 is not read and "Partial invoice indicator" is always defaulted to "1" when item has a multiple account assignment.
    This behaviour can be overwritten by implementing:
    - either BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI for method BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI,
    - or BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI for method BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND.
    So, no need to take care of OME9 customizing.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Multiple account assignment switching between distribution indicators not working for service

    Hi Gurus,
    Account assignment distribution function not working post ECC6 patching activity
    we have recently completed ECC6 patching actvity and we are facing issues on processing multiple account assignment in service.
    we create Purhcase order with single account assignment and will process service with Multiple account assignment selecting distribution on qty or percentage basis till patching functionality works fine post patching we are facing issue when we are selecting distribution indicator system provides an error message switching between distribution indicator is not allowed when we continue system ask to enter in case of multiple account assignment select the distribution indicator. could you please suggest me on the issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    we have found a SAP note
    1915000 - SE685 - Switching between distribution indicators is not allowed
    This is now standard behavior.

  • Multiple account assignment for distribution of freight cost in MIRO Transaction

    Hi MM Gurus
    I have created one Purchase order with multiple account assignment for Asset 'A' in which freight cost is added.
    I have done good receipt in which only material document is generated. (No financial document generated).
    While doing the MIRO for the same Purchase order I m not able to view delivery cost for the same.
    I  check this thing in SDN but no concrete solution ..
    My question is how to capture delivery cost in Multiple account assignment Purchase roder
    Regards
    Amit

    Hi,
    You have done goods receipt for Asset PO but no accounting document created. Now cross check in t.code:OME9 and find GR Non-Valuated check box selected which cause your concern on why your accounting document created for goods receipt for Asset PO!
    Check how delivery cost designed for your Asset Purchase, may be in your case - delivery cost added  to your asset purchase- which result, you could not find delivery cost in invoice posting!
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Multiple account assignment category for one line item in PO

    Dear Experts,
    We are on SRM 5.0 ECS
    One line item of a PO has multiple account assignment category with the cost distribution for
    1. Cost Center - 50%
    2. Order          - 50%
    Is it possible?
    As per my understanding one line item in a PO can have only one account assignment category
    Regards
    Mick

    Hi,
    Yes it is possible by Po line item.
    Just go to transaction bbp_poc through the web interface.
    Select your PO
    Select your line item PO.
    goto the account assignment tab (item overview)
    you get a cost distribution field in percentage
    then you get a cost distribution button : click it and you get several lines where now you can split your 100% in as many lines as you want.
    BR,
    Disha.
    Pls reward points for useful answers.

  • Partial invoice with multiple account assignment

    I'm using PO with multiple account assignment with distribution by percentage and proportional distribution for partial invoice.
    When i post invoice verification for this kind of orders the amount and quantity field in PO item are closed for update and no automatic proportional distribution has been performed.
    The only possibility to update amount in case of partial invoice is to update amount of each account assignment manually (using account assignment button).
    Why the amount and quantity fields are closed for update?
    How i can post partial invoice for multiple account assignment order without manual distribution of changed amounts among different account assignments items?
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks Charlie.
    I am aware of that. But do we have that "partial invoice" field where we can select teh distribution as proportionate or sequence.
    My POs item are having around 30 to 45 account assignments. In that case it is not possible to manual distribute the amount.
    Please advise.
    Thanks,

  • GR/IR Rounding Logic for Multiple Account Assignment

    We have activated business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 (EHP4 release 604), GR valuated. When choosing Distribution on quantity basis and distribute partial inv proportionally, the MIGO postings are different from the MIRO postings. For example, we have a quantity of 12 that we allocate to two different cost centers 33.3 / 66.7 %. We receive a partial qty of 5. MIGO distributes the quantity 1.665 / 3.335, respectively. However, MIRO distributes the quantity 1.666 / 3.333 respectively. Since MIRO is supposed to accept the MIGO quantities and amounts, why is the percentage allocation different?  Is there a way to make the percentages equal for MIGO / MIRO? Modification of the percentage field (VPROZ) in the PO to more than 1 decimal is not an option.
    Example
        PO (quantity-based distribution, partial inv is proportional: Receive partial Qty 5 of total 12
                             Net Value            Qty              Percen           MIGO           MIRO
        Item:            9,600.00 USD    12.000 pc     100.00       4,340.00      4,340.00
        Account 1:  3,200.00 USD      4.000 pc        33.3         1,446.67      1,446.96
        Account 2:  6,400.00 USD      8.000 pc        66.7         2,893.33      2,893.04
    The small difference of $0.29 for this example is inconsequential, but for larger quantieis it will have a greater impact on the account allocation.

    U set or U dont set system will flag the GR non valuated once u assign multiple account assignment.
    But SAP is coming up with GR valuated for Multiple account assignment in enhancement package 4.
    Check out EP4 Presentation at........
    https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/erp-ehp
    Venkat

  • Down payment with multiple account assignment PO

    Dear Experts,
    While posting down payment request through transaction F -47 with
    reference to purchase order we are getting below given error.
    In that purchase order we have given
    multiple account assignment i.e. multiple cost centers (e.g. Cost center A  50% cost center B 10% Cost Center  C 40% i.e. distribution by %)
    but
    system is flagging message
    Item 00010 of purch. document 4500024875 contains no suitable account
    assignment
    Message no. ME717
    What will be the possible cause?
    regards,
    Abhijit

    Hi,
    In the request f-27 tr.code give the purchase order which item you want to give ie., for above said example 10 is a line item of 4500024875 - purchase order and beside you have to mention
    10(lineitem) 4500024875 (purchase order) 2009 (year)
    and system will take that request against the above purchase order.
    Regards,
    satish

  • GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

    Hi,
    We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
    We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
    But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
    We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
    The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
    It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
    The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
    This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
    But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
    Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
    Regards,
    Srivatsan

    Hi Srivatsan ?
    In ECC, you have a configuration point :
    Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
    Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • Multiple account assignment for asset

    Hi,
    I had created PO with multiple account assignment for asset. PO is created with one line item having 5 qty and in multiple account assignment 5 assets are entered with qty distribution.
    I have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post migo(GR) the value is posting for only first one asset not for all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    Reagrds,
    Umesh
    Edited by: Umesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 6:43 AM

    Hi,
    1st check in OME9 t.code for account assignment A, the selection of 2(Multiple account ***)in field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn and Distribution field as 1.
    Then during PO creation for single line item  & in Item details TAB, in account assignment segment, you enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep  qty. with asset number(A1) with  G/L account ( different G/L Account) OR enter  qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep  qty. with another asset number(A2) with  G/L account (different G/L Account)
    ####Example-1: in account assignment segment     , if you have
    G/L account----
    Asset
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
    12346u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
    12347u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
    12348u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
    Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    G/L account (12345): Dr
    G/L account (12346): Dr
    G/L account (12347): Dr
    G/L account (12348 ):Dr
    #####Example-2: in account assignment segment     , if you have
    G/L account----
    Asset
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
    Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    G/L account (12345): Dr
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Undeleting a PO line item with multiple account assignment and PO history

    I  am getting error message
    PO history already exists (Multiple account assignment not possible)
        Message no. MEPO841
    When attempting to undelete a purchase order line item that has GR (nonvaluated) and Invoice postings.
    Sequence of events.
    PO line item was created with mutlitple account assignments ( 50/50 distribution) and GR nonval flags on.
    Invoice Posted (blocked for payment)
    GR done
    PO line item marked for deletion.
    Now getting MEPO841 when attempting to undelete.
    Tried to Reverse GR and cancel material docuement - unable to do so - message no selectable items in PO
      (even with check zero indicator )

    Hello Dan ,
    Error message MEPO 841 is only issued if you have Multiple account assignment function (MAA) activated. Multiple account assignment function is a new business function developed in Release 604.
    If you have MAA active, you are not allowed to change a single account assigned PO which has GR posted to a multiple accounts assigned PO. If this is tried , MEPO 841 will stop you from doing this change.
    If you want to have your old functionality in the lower release, you should switch off the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 ( MM Multiple Account Assignment )  in Release 604.
    Please switch the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 off in test environment  and test the problem again in a productive system.
    I hope this information has been helpful in solving your problem. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
    Thank you.
    Best Regards,
    Frank Farinella

  • Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem

    Hi,
    Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
    If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    Reagrds,
    JM

    Hi Summer,
    We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
    But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
    there is one solution for this is set  'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO  went into error in process after doing this.
    Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
    Thanks in advance
    Vikas

  • PO Error in Process with Multiple account assignment

    Hi ,
    I am working with Extended Classsic scenario.
    Problem is with PO with Multiple account assignement.
    There is only one user who is getting problem with one particular account assignement "CCC" - Cost Center RP.. . When PO gets created with this particular AAC , it goes into "Error in process" only for one user.
    In RZ20 it shows messsage as "Please enter quantity or percentage for account assignment" & "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set f or multi acct. assgt.".
    On other hand , other users are able to order the PO with the same AAC without any error.
    What could be the reason behind this only for one user ?
    Regards,
    Sheetal

    Hi ,
    I have checked it intially and both are identical.
    Initialy the problem was, user had entered 128 times AA line items  ( added & deleted ) in the PO while in the SC it was having only 64.... Our system accepts line items till 99 , so i asked him to delete the items above 99 ..
    So after that POs error has gone and it went for approval..
    But after approval it again went into error in process
    Sheetal

Maybe you are looking for

  • Multiple AEBS, How to choose a specific base station?

    Hello - I have a new AEBS N as well as an older UFO-shaped AEBS. Both are connected to the internet via ethernet and I am sharing a wireless network between the two. I have one printer and 2 USB hard drives hooked up to the AEBS N via Air Disk. So fa

  • HP Laser M1522NF the USB device attached to this computer is not recognised and has Malfunctio​ned

    Hi, I have this printer HP Laser M1522nf.It was working fine till today.Suddenly it has started giveng this error "HP Laser M1522NF the USB device attached to this computer is not recognised and has Malfunctioned" This error is not on printer but on

  • Bank Reconcilation Statement (EBS)- Auto clear

    Hi, I am configuring EBS (format is S SWIFT940). I would like to know how the program would auto clear from the clearing account for cheque payments during importing TC:FF.5 the bank statement. In which field does the cheque no get updated. Thanks Su

  • Namespace on wsdl request

    Hi all, we need to accept a wsdl request with out a namespace on the top element in the body but our system keeps rejecting it as its returning null. the request coming in is  <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/

  • CER 7.x not able to add manual phones

    We have a customer with CER 7.1.1 where we are trying to add some of the analog extensions as manually configured phones in ERL but we couldn't add those becuase all these analog extn's starts with an asterisk (*XXXX) these are outbound only extensio