Multiple account assignment in goods issue reservations

Hello,
I have the folowing situation,
We want to create a reservation (MB21) for a goods issue - for instance for Cost Centre (201) or Fixed Assets 241) - in which we can change the cost centre or fixed asset number por ítem line.
In the standard configuration this does not seem te be posible. The account assignment object is entered at header level in the reservation, not allowing to be able to change the number en every ítem-line.
Is there a way to acomplish this funcionality in the reservation?
Thanks for any answer.
Aart

go through these links also
GL Account Assignment in reservation | SCN
MB21/MB22/MIGO - change account assignment (GL ACCOUNT)

Similar Messages

Multiple Account Assignment in Service PO and Seq No of Acc Assgnmt in FI

Hi Experts,
We have created a Service PO with Multiple Account Assignment. The issue is Seq. No. Acc. ***. in BSEG-ZEKKN is showing as 01 for the line item. But in EKKN-ZEKKN for the same line item is showing as 02. Is it that the Sequence Number of Account Assignment in table EKKN and field ZEKKN flow to ZEKKN field in BSEG?
Or is that BSEG-ZEKKN is posted from FI Document itself? Can anybody explain the logic?

BSEG - ZEKKN field is always defaulted to 1 in FI document, unless you manually override and change it to something else. Since all FI documents are with reference to purchase order and line item, system cannot determine automatically the sequential number of account assignment which needs to be entered for a particular combination of PO and line item in the FI document.
So it is always defaulted as 1 and does not flow from Purchase order to FI document. Infact the field I believe is displayed only in case of transactions like downpayments which require the account assignment in addition to PO and line item. For all others , if there is an account assignment sequence then it is defaulted as 1.
Also see OSS note 204252 which mentions that for multiple account assignments within the same PO and line item no FI documents get generated.
Thanks

Multiple Account Assignment at the time of Good Receipt for one line item

Sap Members.
We have some contracts with cost center distributions that the exact amount is not known. These Blanket Orders require a receiving confirmation.then only we can conclude the cost center, If we create one line item with total amount of contract to one cost center, is there a way can we distribute this cost to the different cost centers at the moment receiving the goods
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Nick

Please Check SAP Notes - Oss Notes
With multiple acct. assignment, enter GR non-val. or cancel GR
Message no. 06417
Diagnosis
In the case of PO items assigned to more than one account, instead of valuation being carried out at the time of goods receipt, the relevant materials are not valuated until the invoice data is entered into the system.
Procedure
     Set the indicator for non-valuated goods receipts
or
     Cancel the GR indicator.
OSS-Notes.                              -
Version: 5        -
Validity: valid since 12.04.2007
Note 204252 - Valuated goods receipt for multiple account assignment
Summary
Symptom
You cannot use the valuated goods receipt function in combination with multiple account assignment.
Other terms
EKPO-WEUNB, screen 0113, ME21, purchase order, 06417, 06 417
Reason and Prerequisites
We have not implemented this function since users who post goods receipts would have to determine the distribution to individual account assignment items during partial deliveries. Generally, users cannot or should not determine this.
An automatic distribution also causes problems and is also not implemented due to technical reasons

MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT IN SERVICE PO

Hello Experts,
I've created service PO with multiple account assignment. This PO contains manually entered condition at header level.Issue is that for multiple A/C assignment, I'm getting message " No delivery Cost can be posted in case of multiple A/C assignment." due to which A/C document doesn't showing any delivery cost.
If I make single A/C assign. then delivery cost is getting posted seperately. I want to know IMG settings reqd. to overcome this. I've made "del. costs seperate post" tick in IMG>>MM>> purchasing>>A/C Assignment>>Maintain A/C assign. cat.>> K Cost Centre, but still getting same error. So tell me any addn. settings reqd. for this.
Thanks in Advance
Amit

Hi,
This is a standard SAP functionality.
In Case of multiple account assignment no delivery cost posted at the time of goods/service Receipt.
The accounting documents are posted at the time of MIRO.
Please do the MIRO and then check.

Delivery cost with multiple account assignment

Dear SAP gurus,
I found a problem in here. In my company we are using multiple account assignment in PO with multiple asset entered in one line. This PO actually will have customs and delivery cost inside of it, however it is not know at the time of PO creation. When the forwarder send the goods, sometimes the shipment can contain more than one PO as well, thus it is impossible to determine the exact value of delivery cost at the time of PO creation.
When the goods are delivered in the FOB point, the vendor deliver goods will send the invoice for goods, and when the goods delivered to our warehouse, then the forwarder will deliver the invoice for the delivery cost. So there is no sequence of the invoicing. Sometimes the goods are invoice earlier than the delivery cost, sometimes it is later.
My requirements are to make sure that the delivery cost is being posted to the asset account of the goods that are being delivered in the PO. I have tried these options:
a. Planned delivery cost inside the PO --> when posting invoice for planned delivery cost, got error message that there is no delivery cost in the PO. I think this is because of the multiple account assignment because when creating PO and inputting the delivery cost i do get warning that no delivery cost for multiple account assignment,
b. Unplanned delivery cost --> ONLY work if the invoice for delivery cost and goods are being posted as one document, which is not the case in here.
c. Separate PO for delivery cost --> got issue in which the person who supposed to create the PO for delivery cost, would not have any idea what asset no to be used (worse --> if the asset is being delivered partially).
Do you have any idea of what to be done in this case? Please help.
Best regards,
John.

See while making the invoice for the delivery cost you have selected the aggreation as planned delivery cost and in the PO you have not maintained the deilvery conditions .The pricing conditions which you have maintained must ebe have condition category - delivery cost .The system will not give thr message thhat you have not mainatined the delivery cost .If you have condition as mandatorty it will show that the conditions ( mandatory) are not maintain.In order to maintain the delivery cost you have to check your conditions whether they are delivery cost related conditins and if then maintain there values in PO and check while doing invoice you will get.
You have also the option of entering the delivery cost at time of the Invoice as unplanned delivery cost ...........
Just check your conditions which you have maintained the calculation schema as delivery conditions and maintain the values and do the invoice proceesing .
It is not advisableto cretae the sepearted PO for the delivety cost as it is not good way of doing the proceess.
Regards
sunny

Multiple account assigned PO.........

HI Gurus,
Can any one tell me the significance of Multiple account assigned PO's.....How do they work...what are the settings?
What are the scenarios possible in this?
Regards,
Prasanna.

Hi Biju,
I would appreciate if you could give me any advices for this below issue which relates to account assigned PO:
I am creating PO, account assignment C - sales order.
In tab Account assignment we already enter the sales order number, and the system automatically get profit center from sales order.
However, when we do Goods receipt, the message error message KI235 occurred "Account XXXX requires an assignment to a CO object".
I already referred to OSS note, and maintain CO Object in OKB9, and we posted GR successfully.
Our concern is we don't want to manually update in OKB9, we want the system to treat Sales order as a CO Object, or automatically get CO Object from Sales order.
Another concern is we want to know if normally could PO get CO Object from field Cost center (KSTRG) in Profit. Segment, tab Account Assignment in Sales order??
Can we update field Cost center (KSTRG) in Profit. Segment, tab Account Assignment for Sales order when we already defined Profit center (PRCTR)?
Thank you in advance for your reply :).
Rgds,
Linh

GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

Hi,
We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
Regards,
Srivatsan

Hi Srivatsan ?
In ECC, you have a configuration point :
Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
Kind regards,
Yann

PO with hundreds of multiple account assignment lines on service line level

Hi, experts,
I want to create a external service PO with multiple account assignment.
However, in the service line item level, when I click on the multiple account assignment, I could only enter 97 lines. But I need to create around 1000 account assignment lines for a single service line.
Is it possible to extend the no. of account assignment lines inside the service line level? May I know how to do so?
Thanks & regards,
James

I'm facing a similar error.
What I think it's happening is that for technical reasons the program involved only delivers 99 line items... To make things worse, When you try to create an invoice for that full item you are going to get an error bc the invoice reserves line 99 for unplanned account assignments.
The suggestion from SAP is to create further items with 98 account assignment items or less.
Have a look at these notes: 486808, 651784
Regards,
Nelson
PS: Please rewards points for helpful answers

Multiple Account Assignment details for Service PRs

Hi,
       I have developed a RFC for creating PRs. For multiple service PRs, multiple services are getting created but account assignment details getting created only for the first service line item. Iu2019m using BAPI_REQUISISTION_CREATE. Please provide me a solution.
Regards,
N.Senthil

hi all,
      the issue has been resolved by passing the below mentioned values.
      wa_item_data-distrib = '1'.      "FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT based on the quanlity
      wa_item_data-part_inv = '1'.     "FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT
solution got from
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE
http://www.sapnet.ru/viewtopic.php?p=9306
Regards,
N.Senthil

Multiple account assignment for asset

Hi,
I had created PO with multiple account assignment for asset. PO is created with one line item having 5 qty and in multiple account assignment 5 assets are entered with qty distribution.
I have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post migo(GR) the value is posting for only first one asset not for all.
So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
Reagrds,
Umesh
Edited by: Umesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 6:43 AM

Hi,
1st check in OME9 t.code for account assignment A, the selection of 2(Multiple account ***)in field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn and Distribution field as 1.
Then during PO creation for single line item & in Item details TAB, in account assignment segment, you enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep qty. with asset number(A1) with G/L account ( different G/L Account) OR enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep qty. with another asset number(A2) with G/L account (different G/L Account)
####Example-1: in account assignment segment , if you have
G/L account----
Asset
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
12346u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
12347u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
12348u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
Vendor A/C: Cr
G/L account (12345): Dr
G/L account (12346): Dr
G/L account (12347): Dr
G/L account (12348 ):Dr
#####Example-2: in account assignment segment , if you have
G/L account----
Asset
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
Vendor A/C: Cr
G/L account (12345): Dr
Regards,
Biju K

Multiple Account assignment in PO cause no GR value

HI,
In PO, we have multiple account assignment, and thus the GR,Non-Valuated will be checked automatically. In this case, we can only have the financial posting have the invocie receipt time.
We can have the correct financial posting, but will not the real time posting after GR before IR.
Like we have GR, but after 2 months we shall have IR. Before we IR, we can not found any Financial posting for Goods receipt. Do we have any solution for this?
Kerry Liu

May i ask the reason why SAP can not do value GR for multi-accoutn assignment? As our Finance team to have financial posting when they have the good receipt, seemed it's hard to do if we use multi-account assignment? or any other better ways?

Multiple account assignment with non valuated gr

hi,
For multiple account assignement - One PO - MORE THAN ONE ASSETS - the GRN becomes "non valuated " (automatically- the field is grayed out). The account document will not be generated. The asset value will be captured on the MIRO date.
pls explain why system behave like this?
regards
sumit simran

Hi,
Yes for asset GRN always non-valuated
check following sap not also
Note 9175 - No value update is performed for goods movements
check setting of OMS9 for asset A you will get clear idea
check following link also
[Asset PO;
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Multiple Account assignment with cost distribution value error

Hello Experts,
We are facing the below issue,
We are trying to create Limit SC with MAA cost center with cost distribution "By Value". we distribute the total value to 5 cost centers. when we try to order the SC, system is not allowing us to order, we got the error message "Multiple account assignment only with percentage less than 100%".
Please advise how to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Santhosh Kumar.G

Hi
Check this OSS notes : 1644804
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar

Valuated GR with Multiple Account Assignment

Hi SAP Experts!
I would want to know the logic behind always using a Non-valuated GRs with Multiple Account Assignments.
I am asking this because we would want to make use of the budget checking during GRs. More specifically, whenever there is a GR, the committed budget will move to the actual budget. In our business practice, more often than not, the invoice is entered much later than the GR. This would mean that the amount of the purchase will remain in the committed state even if the goods have already been received.
Is there a way to work around this in SAP? Or is this the only way that it does this?
Hope to hear from you guys soon. Thanks in advance.

Hi,
I am sorry but the basic process is that you cannopt have a valuated receipt for a line with multiple account assignments.
An alternative (albeit a not very good one) is to just use separate lines on the PO instead of multiple account assignment.
this may not be any help, but I doubt if there are any user-friendly alternatives.
Steve B

Undeleting a PO line item with multiple account assignment and PO history

I am getting error message
PO history already exists (Multiple account assignment not possible)
Message no. MEPO841
When attempting to undelete a purchase order line item that has GR (nonvaluated) and Invoice postings.
Sequence of events.
PO line item was created with mutlitple account assignments ( 50/50 distribution) and GR nonval flags on.
Invoice Posted (blocked for payment)
GR done
PO line item marked for deletion.
Now getting MEPO841 when attempting to undelete.
Tried to Reverse GR and cancel material docuement - unable to do so - message no selectable items in PO
(even with check zero indicator )

Hello Dan ,
Error message MEPO 841 is only issued if you have Multiple account assignment function (MAA) activated. Multiple account assignment function is a new business function developed in Release 604.
If you have MAA active, you are not allowed to change a single account assigned PO which has GR posted to a multiple accounts assigned PO. If this is tried , MEPO 841 will stop you from doing this change.
If you want to have your old functionality in the lower release, you should switch off the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 ( MM Multiple Account Assignment ) in Release 604.
Please switch the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 off in test environment and test the problem again in a productive system.
I hope this information has been helpful in solving your problem. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Frank Farinella

Multiple account assignment in goods issue reservations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for