Multiple Clients acess thru same desktop

I need to investigate for following problem :
from one desktop we can connect to multiple different client (different network) by keeping data secure. that is we can open different virtual desktops like VMs and have them secure also controlling privacy of one client with another. How can we achieve
this. Kindly help

Hi,
MSTSC is based on RDP. RDP is very secure and you can launch multiple MSTSC/RDP instances/sessions simultaneously. Furthermore, you can SSL to make it more secure.
Secure RDS (Remote Desktop Services) Connections with SSL
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/ff458357.aspx
RDP Security
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc240770.aspx
Thanks.
Jeremy Wu
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • WDS 2012 R2 - Cannot PXE multiple clients at the same time

    Hello All,
    This is my first post on here so I apologize if this is the wrong place.  I work for a school district and we are implementing WDS 2012 R2.  We've been extremely satisfied with the speeds and ease of use through unattend files.  However, for
    the past month I've been looking for a possible answer to a problem that has plagued us from day one of implementation.
    So here's the problem:
    I have a stand alone WDS server which is not a domain controller and is not our DHCP server.  I have IP helpers and broadcast forwarders setup on the network.  As well as option 66 and 67 in DHCP.  So far so good right!
    Well that's partially right.  When we boot one client at a time to the WDS server.  Everything works as intended.  We can TFTP the necessary files from the WDS server.  Everything boots up and we're off and running.
    However, if we boot up two or more clients at the same time.  The WDS server never responds to the traffic.  The clients get their DHCP information.  They start the referral and download from the WDS server, but get no response.  I'm
    really hoping that someone on here would have some insight of something I can try.  I've about exhausted my list of peers and contacts.  They're all stumped as well and were smart enough to stay with 2008 WDS.
    I would prefer to stick with 2012 R2 since it's setup and working for the most part.  With only this one hiccup.
    Thanks in advance for any guidance!

    Hello Daniel,
    I appreciate the reply and apologize for taking so long to get back to this.   Things have been a little hectic over here.
    I have tried everything on this forum and I am still unsuccessful in PXE booting multiple clients at the same time.
    Multicast is enabled on the server, and it works for the clients.  However, as stated in the original post.  I cannot boot multiple machines at the same time.  I can start them from the image selection screen around the same time though.  So,
    that appears to be working fine.

  • Connect one JAVA ADS instance to multiple clients from the same ABAP system

    Hi,
    Does anyone know whether it is possible to connect multplie clients from the same ABAP system to a JAVA instance running ADS?
    If so how do you setup the java destinations in Visual Admin and SM59 RFC connections?
    Any help is appreciated,
    Sander

    Dear Sander,
    this is always the case if you arrange the ADS connection.
    You have to set up the RFC connection 'ADS' in ABAP side and this connection/destination is client independent. So you can use this from all clients of your abap system.
    On Java side you have to arrange the already mentioned FP_ICF_DATA_<SID> destination. On the ABAP system and client (you specify in this destination) you have to maintain the user ADS_AGENT and your templates should also exist on this client. If there is no client defined, the default client will be used.
    Regards
    Istvan

  • Can we run 2 version of same full client on the same desktop

    Hi Friends,
    We are in the process of upgrading our Hyperion Planning environment from 9.3.0 to 9.3.1, Some our our users utilize the full client for Reporting Studio and Analytic Administrative Services Console on their desktop. While the upgrade is in process, the users will need to access both versions. So, with that in mind, is it possible to install and and run the 9.3.0 and the 9.3.1 version of the full client for Reporting Studio and Analytic Administrative Services Console on the same dekstop at the same time?
    Please suggest.
    Regards.

    Hi,
    You could use the java web client version of AAS then you wouldn't need to be concerned about running 2 clients.
    http://<aas machine>:10080/easconsole/console.html
    I am not totally sure but Financial Reporting studio may be backwards compatible to version 9.3.0
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Multiple Clients Installed on same NT box.

    I have oracle 8.1.6 client and 8.1.7 client installed in seprate directories on the same machine.
    How do I tell which client I am useing if the ODBC I use is Merant 3.60 generic drivers?
    I think the tnsnames.ora file determins which client version connects to which database. The seperate directories specify which database can be connected via which client.
    null

    Honestly, I'm not certain how third-party drivers deal with a multi-homed Oracle client. My guess would be that it would use the primary Oracle home, i.e. the home that you have selected in the Oracle Home Selector. Since the primary Oracle home is listed first in the path, I'd assume that all the Oracle DLL's would be loaded from the primary home.
    If you want a definitive answer, you'll probably need to contact Merant.
    Justin

  • SAP GRC 10 : Can we connect GRC to multiple clients within the same system

    We are having this requirement to connect SAP GRC to two different clients within the QA System.
    Just wondering whether this is possible to connect at the same time. We have created connectors in both the clients in ECC  and in GRC we have connectors for both ECC Cllients. When I try to add the connector for second client in SPRO , it is not even showing up entry for that
    Please confirm whether we can do this

    Hi Anil
    If you have two ECC clients you would create two connectors to GRC. You would need two SM59 RFC connections (one for each client) to map them through.You can map them to the same logical group though.
    What is not working for you? Did you define both clients as their own connectors?
    Regards
    Colleen

  • Sending mouse pointer co-ordinates to multiple clients

    Hi. I used the MouseMotionListener to get mouse pointer co-ordinates and send those values to one single client. Now i want to know how i could send those co-ordinate values to multiple clients at the same time? If i use multi-threading then what all the steps should i do in the run() method???

    Hi. I tried another way. Its like this.
    I declared two global variables x and y for holding two mouse co-ordinates in class a.
    class a {
    public static int x = 0;
    public static int y = 0;
    Now in the main method of one class, I accepted client connections and started the thread like this :
    socket = server.accept();
    thread= new HandlerThread(socket);
    thread.start();
    Now in the class HandlerThread this is what i did :
    class HandlerThread extends Thread {
    private Socket s1;
    ObjectOutputStream oos;
    public HandlerThread(Socket s) {
    this.s1=s;
    public void run() {
    try
    oos = new ObjectOutputStream(s1.getOutputStream());
    oos.writeObject(a.x);
    oos.writeObject(a.y);
    catch(IOException e)
    System.out.println("Exception"+e);
    At the sender side when i moved my mouse pointer on screen, i was able to get the changing mouse co-ordinates value. But at the receiver side, only the initial value of x=0 & y=0 was obtained. I started two client connections and for both i received only the initial value. Can someone tell me what could be the reason for this?? Plz reply.

  • RMI: multiple clients for one RMI server?

    Hi,
    We're thinking of making a RMI Server.
    However, can multiple clients access the same RMI Server at the same moment?
    So, if one client is connected to the RMI Server, what will happen with the other clients that want to work to do the same thing at the same moment ?

    all over the same port?
    so for example, 100 clients can work simultaneously on this simple server?
    import java.rmi.Remote;
    import java.rmi.RemoteException;
    public interface OkServer extends Remote {
        public String getOk() throws RemoteException;
    import java.rmi.server.UnicastRemoteObject;
    import java.rmi.RMISecurityManager;
    import java.rmi.RemoteException;
    import java.rmi.Naming;
    public class OkServerImpl extends UnicastRemoteObject implements OkServer {
        public OkServerImpl() throws RemoteException {
        public String getOk() {
         return "ok";
        public static void main (String args[]) throws Exception {
              System.setSecurityManager(new RMISecurityManager());
              OkServerImpl OkSvr = new OkServerImpl();
              Naming.bind("OkServer", OkSvr);
    }

  • Accessing the same stateful session bean from multiple clients in a clustered environment

    I am trying to access the same stateful session bean from multiple
              clients. I also want this bean to have failover support so we want to
              deploy it in a cluster. The following description is how we have tried
              to solve this problem, but it does not seem to be working. Any
              insight would be greatly appreciated!
              I have set up a cluster of three servers. I deployed a stateful
              session bean with in memory replication across the cluster. A client
              obtains a reference to an instance of one of these beans to handle a
              request. Subsequent requests will have to use the same bean and could
              come from various clients. So after using the bean the first client
              stores the handle to the bean (actually the replica aware stub) to be
              used by other clients to be able to obtain the bean. When another
              client retrieves the handle gets the replica aware stub and makes a
              call to the bean the request seems to unpredictably go to any of the
              three servers rather than the primary server hosting that bean. If the
              call goes to the primary server everything seems to work fine the
              session data is available and it gets backed up on the secondary
              server. If it happens to go to the secondary server a bean that has
              the correct session data services the request but gives the error
              <Failed to update the secondary copy of a stateful session bean from
              home:ejb20-statefulSession-TraderHome>. Then any subsequent requests
              to the primary server will not reflect changes made on the secondary
              and vice versa. If the request happens to go to the third server that
              is not hosting an instance of that bean then the client receives an
              error that the bean was not available. From my understanding I thought
              the replica aware stub would know which server is the primary host for
              that bean and send the request there.
              Thanks in advance,
              Justin
              

              If 'allow-concurrent-call' does exactly what you need, then you don't have a problem,
              do you?
              Except of course if you switch ejb containers. Oh well.
              Mike
              "FBenvadi" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >I've got the same problem.
              >I understand from you that concurrent access to a stateful session bean
              >is
              >not allowed but there is a
              >token is weblogic-ejb-jar.xml that is called 'allow-concurrent-call'
              >that
              >does exactly what I need.
              >What you mean 'you'll get a surprise when you go to production' ?
              >I need to understand becouse I can still change the design.
              >Thanks Francesco
              >[email protected]
              >
              >"Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              >news:[email protected]...
              >>
              >> Get the fix immediately from BEA and test it. It would be a shame to
              >wait
              >until
              >> December only to get a fix - that doesn't work.
              >>
              >> As for stateful session bean use - just remember that concurrent access
              >to
              >a stateful
              >> session bean is not allowed. Things will work fine until you go to
              >production
              >> and encounter some real load - then you will get a surprise.
              >>
              >> Mike
              >>
              >> [email protected] (Justin Meyer) wrote:
              >> >I just heard back from WebLogic Tech Support and they have confirmed
              >> >that this is a bug. Here is their reply:
              >> >
              >> >There is some problem in failover of stateful session beans when its
              >> >run from a java client.However, it is fixed now.
              >> >
              >> >The fix will be in SP2 which will be out by december.
              >> >
              >> >
              >> >Mike,
              >> >Thanks for your reply. I do infact believe we are correctly using
              >a
              >> >stateful session bean however it may have been misleading from my
              >> >description of the problem. We are not accessing the bean
              >> >concurrently from 2 different clients. The second client will only
              >> >come into play if the first client fails. In this case we want to
              >be
              >> >able to reacquire the handle to our stateful session bean and call
              >it
              >> >from the secondary client.
              >> >
              >> >
              >> >Justin
              >> >
              >> >"Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              >news:<[email protected]>...
              >> >> You should be using an entity bean, not a stateful session bean
              >for
              >> >this application.
              >> >>
              >> >> A stateful session bean is intended to be keep state (stateful)
              >for
              >> >the duration
              >> >> of a client's session (session).
              >> >>
              >> >> It is not meant to be shared by different clients - in fact, if
              >you
              >> >attempt to
              >> >> access the same stateful session bean concurrently - it will throw
              >> >an exception.
              >> >>
              >> >> We did your little trick (storing/retrieving handle) with a stateful
              >> >session bean
              >> >> on WLS 5.1 - and it did work properly - not as you describe. Our
              >sfsb's
              >> >were not
              >> >> replicated as yours are.
              >> >>
              >> >> Mike
              >> >>
              >> >> [email protected] (Justin Meyer) wrote:
              >> >> >I am trying to access the same stateful session bean from multiple
              >> >> >clients. I also want this bean to have failover support so we want
              >> >to
              >> >> >deploy it in a cluster. The following description is how we have
              >tried
              >> >> >to solve this problem, but it does not seem to be working. Any
              >> >> >insight would be greatly appreciated!
              >> >> >
              >> >> >I have set up a cluster of three servers. I deployed a stateful
              >> >> >session bean with in memory replication across the cluster. A client
              >> >> >obtains a reference to an instance of one of these beans to handle
              >> >a
              >> >> >request. Subsequent requests will have to use the same bean and
              >could
              >> >> >come from various clients. So after using the bean the first client
              >> >> >stores the handle to the bean (actually the replica aware stub)
              >to
              >> >be
              >> >> >used by other clients to be able to obtain the bean. When another
              >> >> >client retrieves the handle gets the replica aware stub and makes
              >> >a
              >> >> >call to the bean the request seems to unpredictably go to any of
              >the
              >> >> >three servers rather than the primary server hosting that bean.
              >If
              >> >the
              >> >> >call goes to the primary server everything seems to work fine the
              >> >> >session data is available and it gets backed up on the secondary
              >> >> >server. If it happens to go to the secondary server a bean that
              >has
              >> >> >the correct session data services the request but gives the error
              >> >> ><Failed to update the secondary copy of a stateful session bean
              >from
              >> >> >home:ejb20-statefulSession-TraderHome>. Then any subsequent requests
              >> >> >to the primary server will not reflect changes made on the secondary
              >> >> >and vice versa. If the request happens to go to the third server
              >that
              >> >> >is not hosting an instance of that bean then the client receives
              >an
              >> >> >error that the bean was not available. From my understanding I
              >thought
              >> >> >the replica aware stub would know which server is the primary host
              >> >for
              >> >> >that bean and send the request there.
              >> >> >
              >> >> >Thanks in advance,
              >> >> >Justin
              >>
              >
              >
              

  • We have created shared folder on multiple client machine in domain environment on different 2 OS like-XP,Vista, etc. from some day's When we facing problem when we are access from host name that shared folder is accessible but same time same computer when

    Hello All,
    we have created shared folder on multiple client machine in domain environment on different 2 OS like-XP,Vista, etc.
    from some day's When we facing problem when we are access from host name that shared folder is accessible but same time same computer when we are trying to access the share folder with IP it asking for credentials i have type again and again
    correct credential but unable to access that. If i re-share the folder then we are access it but when we are restarted the system then same problem is occurring.
    I have checked IP,DNS,Gateway and more each & everything is well.
    Pls suggest us.
    Pankaj Kumar

    Hi,
    According to your description, my understanding is that the same shared folder can be accessed by name, but can’t be accessed be IP address and asks for credentials.
    Please try to enable the option below on the device which has shared folder:
    Besides, check the Advanced Shring settings of shared folder and confrim that if there is any limitation settings.
    Best Regards,
    Eve Wang
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • TS2972 I have multiple libraries on the "same computer" with two different desktops, can't I share between two libraries on the same computer?

    I'm trying to use home sharing to share content between libraries so some of the combined content in a given library, can be synced to an ipad.   Instad of having mulitple computers, i have multiple libraries on the same computer using two desktops.  How do I share within the same computer?

    iTunes must be running for home sharing to work.  There is no way to have home sharing running simultaniously for two users on the same computer.
    Simply add the media files using File > Add File/Folder option in iTunes.

  • Multiple clients with same account on a single IMAP server

    Hi,
    I am connecting to a IMAP server using same account but from 2 different machines. From one machine a mark a message as SEEN=FALSE. But on the second machine, the flag will still be TRUE.
    Is there any way to co-ordinate between multiple clients so that all the clients are in sync.
    Regards,
    Nitin.

    I was able to resolve the problem using addMessageCountListener and messagesAdded method, as suggested by you.
    I am now facing another problem. Whenever a new message is received, code inside messagesAdded method gets executed. Here I am trying to spawn another thread and do some stuff. But this new thread is not starting at all. It goes into some JavaMail:EventQueue and does nothing. What is the concept of EventQueue here? How can I get this new thread executed?
    Also will there be synchronization problems in messagesAdded method. Say I received a message and I am processing it in the messagesAdded method. In the mean time another message comes up. How will this behave.

  • How can I switch between multiple windows of the same application (e.g. Safari) over several desktops ?

    Hi All,
    I have one application, for example safari, open and running with multiple windows (with or without tabs) spread over several desktops.
    How can I switch between the windows only via keyboard? CMD+> and CMD+< let me only swicht between windows open on the one desktop I am currently looking at.
    thanks for your replies,
    equi

    Barney,
    many thanks for your efforts and your time (preparing and posting the screenshot, answering to this question,...).
    Unfortunately, moving the focus to the next window only works with windows on the same desktop.
    btw, using a german keyboard layout and german language settings the shortcut is "cmd+<".
    I can switch with this shortcut between different windows of my Safari which reside on the same desktop, but I cannot swith between different safari windows distributed over several desktops.
    Thanks,
    equi    

  • Multiple-client, same server, different configurations

    Hi experts,
    Recently we have got a project of IS-U Electricity where it has been planned that the same server we used for the last project will be used for this upcoming project where the configurations are diffrent from each other but both of them will run together in same development, quality and production servers.
    My question is whether we would be able to configure sap as per the requirements for the upcoming project to a particular client whereas the rest of the clients will use old configurations for the existing project in the same server. Will there be any cross-client configuration conflicts?
    - Arghya

    Arghya:
    The answer to this question is unrelated the industry solution.  Multiple client scenarios are used in many solutions.  Some configuration is client dependent and so would be different in each client; other configuration is client independent and would be used in all clients.  That would be part of the analysis to determine if multiple clients or multiple systems is the correct approach.
    regards,
    bill.

  • Connecting to multiple clusters from the same client

    We have a scenario where our cache client (extend client) should be able to connect to multiple clusters. All the clusters use the exact same configuration (same caches, same services etc) but running in different geographical locations. I know that the <remote-addresses> can be used to add multiple addresses but I'm assuming this is provided solely for fault tolerance. So, does the client actually support connecting to multiple clusters at the same time?
    Thanks
    Sijo Mathew

    Hi Sijo,
    Normally to connect a client to multiple clusters you would just define multiple <proxy-scheme> settings in your client configuration file, each one having a different name and pointing to a different cluster. You then map caches to the proxy-scheme for the cluster those caches live on.
    What may confuse things in your case is that you say the different clusters are identical and contain the same caches and services so you may have problems mapping caches on the client to different clusters.
    What are you trying to achieve by doing this if the clusters are all identical?
    JK

Maybe you are looking for

  • Insert query takes long time

    Hi, I have written a procedure that does the following : 1- Creates a temp table 2- INSERT /*+ append */ INTO <temp table> (Select ......, (select sum(amt) from tbl1 b where b.col1=a.col2 and b.col3=a.col3 and (b.col4=a.col4 OR b.col5=a.col5) ... grp

  • How do I create a querry in sb1 2004

    Hi all I want to create a query. I looked in tools-> queries -> query manager but i doesn't enable me to create new queries only run the existing ones So how do i create queries? appreciate the help Yoav

  • How can i connect a PDA wirelessly to a server

    hi i want to write a program that a PDA be able to connect to a server wirelessly, download the information such as user loging page from server and then update the server. does anybody knows how can i do that. many thanks

  • IPhone 3Gs broken port

    I think my iPhone's dock port is broken. I've tried syncing videos, photos, and audio to it and I've received varied problems with each. For starters photos come out with most correct but some rearranged in a Picasso like fashion and still others wit

  • My PriorityQueue doesn't seem to sort it's elements correctly ....

    Hi, here is my semi-complete program, I have removed the methods that were irrelevant to make things simple. The program is supposed to represent Graphs, and minimal spanning trees. I first have to put edges in a priority queue of type : PQEntry (Bel