MULTIPLE LISTENER의 LOAD BALANCING 및 2개의 NETWORK CARD 사용 시 SETUP

제품 : SQL*NET
작성날짜 : 1997-11-24
MULTIPLE LISTENER의 LOAD BALANCING 및 2개의 NETWORK CARD 사용 시 SETUP
=====================================================================
Oracle V7.3의 SQL*Net 2.3의 새로운 기능으로 여러 개의 Listener를 띄우면서
상호 Load Balancing을 유지하는 기능을 소개하고자 한다.
Load Balancing 기능을 이용하여 각각의 Listener와 Oracle Instance 간의
Overloading을 줄일 수 있다.
다음의 예는 하나의 장비 내에 2개의 Network Card가 있을 경우에 대해 setup을
하는 방법이며 만일 하나의 Network Card가 있을 경우는 Host는 하나만 지정
하면 된다.
1. init<SID>.ora file을 지정할 Parameter
MTS_MULTIPLE_LISTENERS=TRUE
COMPATIBLE=7.3.2.0
2. 예를 들어 Listener를 2개 사용하는 경우라면 initSID.ora에
mts_dispatchers="tcp,10"
mts_max_dispatchers=20
mts_servers=20
mts_max_servers=40
mts_service=ORA73
mts_listener_address="(address_list=
(address=(protocol=tcp)(port=1621)(host=152.69.30.100))
mts_listener_address="(address_list=
(address=(protocol=tcp)(port=1622)(host=152.69.30.100))
mts_listener_address="(address_list=
(address=(protocol=tcp)(port=1623)(host=152.69.30.102))
mts_listener_address="(address_list=
(address=(protocol=tcp)(port=1624)(host=152.69.30.102))
3. listener.ora file에 설정되는 내용은
LISTENER1 =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = tcp)
(HOST = 152.69.30.100)
(PORT=1621)
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = tcp)
(HOST = 152.69.30.100)
(PORT=1622)
LISTENER2 =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = tcp)
(HOST = 152.69.30.102)
(PORT=1623)
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = tcp)
(HOST = 152.69.30.102)
(PORT=1624)
SID_LIST_LISTENER1 =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = ORA73)
(ORACLE_HOME=/oracle2/ora73/app/oracle/product/7.3.2)
SID_LIST_LISTENER2 =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = ORA73)
(ORACLE_HOME=/oracle2/ora73/app/oracle/product/7.3.2)
STARTUP_WAIT_TIME_LISTENER1 = 0
STARTUP_WAIT_TIME_LISTENER2 = 0
CONNECT_TIMEOUT_LISTENER1 = 0
CONNECT_TIMEOUT_LISTENER2 = 0
4. tnsnames.ora file에 설정되는 내용들
* 다수의 port에 Random하게 접속하는 경우
RANDOM =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host = 152.69.30.100)
(Port = 1621)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host = 152.69.30.100)
(Port = 1622)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host = 152.69.30.102)
(Port = 1623)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host = 152.69.30.102)
(Port = 1624)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
* 개개의 Port로 접속하는 경우
TORA1 =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host =krrcsun)
(Port = 1621)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
TORA2 =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host =krrcsun)
(Port = 1622)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
TORA3 =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host =krrcsun)
(Port = 1623)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
TORA4 =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host =krrcsun)
(Port = 1624)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
5. 각각의 Listener를 띄우는 방법
$ lsnrctl start LISTENER1
$ lsnrctl start LISTENER2

Similar Messages

  • Network Card Setup

    I am having difficulty connecting to the internet. I have tried static IP and DHCP but nothing works. I am sure I have all the correct information. I am using the Network Card Setup utility. Am I missing something? Any insight would be appreciated.

    Originally Posted by willemellis
    I am having difficulty connecting to the internet. I have tried static IP and DHCP but nothing works. I am sure I have all the correct information. I am using the Network Card Setup utility. Am I missing something? Any insight would be appreciated.
    The install defaults to DHCP, If your workstation can connect to the internet, then the server should be able also.

  • Listener Load Balancing Becomes Unbalanced!!

    Hi all, Yesterday we observed that for no apparent reason, one instance in a RAC database appeared to be left out of the listener load balancing equation. This resulted in a very high load on the remaining instances. The only way we could repair this was to restart the un(der)utilized instance.
    Before restart:
    SQL> select count(*),inst_id from gv$session group by inst_id;
    COUNT(*) INST_ID
    216 7
    41 12
    220 9
    After restart:
    SQL> select count(*),inst_id from gv$session group by inst_id;
    COUNT(*) INST_ID
    222 7
    218 12
    224 9
    Has anyone else seen this? Is there any way to tell what is going on? Is there any way to fix this without restarting the instance? We have tried restarting various listeners without success. Thanks in advance, Mike

    Actually, we have the problem in effect on one of our databases right now. The ocr status for all the instances is good:
    ora.S.S1.inst ONLINE ONLINE on x911
    ora.S.S2.inst ONLINE ONLINE on x912
    ora.S.S9.inst ONLINE ONLINE on x919
    ora.S.db ONLINE ONLINE on x927
    But when we look at the number of sessions per instance:
    SQL> select inst_id,count(*) from gv$session group by inst_id;
    INST_ID COUNT(*)
    1 50
    2 237
    9 230
    They are not balanced. We look at the load average on each host:
    oracle@x912:~> ssh x911 uptime
    3:44pm up 224 days 6:48, 15 users, load average: 1.07, 1.00, 0.99
    oracle@x912:~> ssh x912 uptime
    3:44pm up 223 days 11:46, 12 users, load average: 5.26, 5.18, 5.35
    oracle@x912:~> ssh x919 uptime
    3:44pm up 223 days 11:42, 10 users, load average: 3.64, 4.01, 6.47
    x911 for instance S1 is the lowest (which we would expect with no connections)
    But when we connect through SQL*PLUS:
    oracle@x912:~> sqlplus dbamb@s
    SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production on Wed Dec 19 15:47:06 2007
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
    Enter password:
    Connected to:
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, OLAP and Data Mining options
    SQL> select instance_name from v$instance;
    INSTANCE_NAME
    S2
    We get connected to a higher utilized instance. When we connect to the instance by name:
    SQL> conn dbamb@s1
    Enter password:
    Connected.
    SQL> /
    INSTANCE_NAME
    S1
    We get it. Isn't the RAC db connection is supposed to go to the host with the lowest load average? What can I do?
    Thanks in advance, Mike

  • ISE 1.2 - Multiple NICs/Load Balancing for DHCP Probe

    Hello guys
    Just prepping an ISE 1.2 patch 8 setup in our organization. I am going for the virtual appliances with multiple NICs. It will be a distributed deployment with 4 x PSNs behind a load balancer and there is no requirement for wireless or guest user at the moment. I've got 2 points I will like to get some guidance on:
    Our DC has a dedicated mgmt network and I plan to IP the gig0 interface of the PANs, MNTs and PSNs from this subnet. All device admin, clustering, config replication, etc will be over this interface. However, RADIUS/probe/other user traffic to the ISE PSNs will be over the gig1 interface which will be addressed from another L3 network. Is this a supported configuration in ISE?
    I intend to use the DHCP probe as part of device profiling and will ideally like to have just an additional ip helper to add to our switch SVI config. Also, it will appear that WLCs can only be configured for 2 DHCP servers for a given network so another consideration for when we bringing our WLAN in scope. We however use ACE load balancers within our DC and from what I have read, they do not support DHCP load balancing. Are there any workarounds to using the DHCP probe with multiple PSNs without having to add each node as an ip helper/DHCP server on the NADs?
    Thanks in advance
    Sayre

    Hello Sayre-
    For Question #1:
    Management is restricted to GigabitEthernet 0 and that cannot be changed so you should be good there
    You can configure Radius and Profiling to be enabled on other interfaces
    Even though you are not using guest services yet, you can dedicate an interface just for that. As a result, you can separate guest traffic completely from your production network
    Take a look at this link for more info:
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-2/installation_guide/ise_ig/ise_app_c-ports.html
    For Question #2
    If you are using a Cisco WLC and running code 7.4 and newer you don't need to mess with the IP helper configurations. 
    The controller can be configured to act as a collector for client profiling and interact with the DHCP thread along with the RADIUS accounting task that is running on the controller. The controller receives a copy of the DHCP request packet sent from the DHCP thread and parses the DHCP packet for two options:
    –Option 12—HostName of the client
    –Option 60—The Vendor Class Identifier
    After this information is gathered from the DHCP_REQUEST packet, a message is formed by the controller with these option fields and is sent to the RADIUS accounting thread, which is in turn transmitted to the ISE in the form of an interim accounting message.
    Both DHCP and HTTP profiling settings are located under the "Advanced" configuration tab in the WLC
    On the other hand, you can also use Anycast for profiling. You can check out some of Cisco Live's sessions for more info on that. Here is one that is from a couple of years (There are more recent ones that are available as well):
    http://www.alcatron.net/Cisco%20Live%202013%20Melbourne/Cisco%20Live%20Content/Security/BRKSEC-3040%20%20Advanced%20ISE%20and%20Secure%20Access%20Deployment.pdf
    I hope this helps!
    Thank you for rating helpful posts!

  • Multiple roles load balancing on Ms Exchange 2010

    Dear list member !
    Currently. I installed Ms Exchange SP3 Multiple roles on a single server. I have been planning deploy add a member exchange 2010 SP3 for redundancy DAG but these are
    people also IT operation told to me so install CAS, HUB, MB Roles will  Load balancing CAS, DAG based on TWO Server "Ex 2010 SP3:". Following  Microsoft document, then almost do not that.<o:p></o:p>
    Please feedback to able or unable
    very appreciate

    Hi,
    To load balance CAS servers, you need to use the Windows Network Load Balancing or the Hardware Load Balancing. For more details about this, you can refer to the following article.
    Understanding Load Balancing in Exchange 2010
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/ff625247(v=exchg.141).aspx#options
    If you want to deploy DAG in your environment and you also want to load balance your CAS servers, it is recommended to install Mailbox server role and CAS role on different servers. Because DAG members utilize Windows Failover Clustering, which can’t co-exist
    with WNLB. Of course, you can choose to use HLB to load balance CAS servers.
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • LRT224 Load Balance "dumb" DHCP router setup... HELP!

    Hi
    I'm trying to set up a LRT224 with two ADSL modems connected to one network with load balancing.
    I'm not going to use vlan or vpn at all. 
    All I need it to do is be a "dumb" router that combines the speed of both Internet connections.
    Working mode is set to Router
    LAN 192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0 (I changed the LAN ip range)
    WAN 1 and 2 gets IP, default gateway and DNS trough DHCP from the modems.
    Wan 1: IP 192.168.1.65 Gateway 192.168.1.1 DNS 192.168.1.1
    Wan 2: IP 192.168.2.38 Gateway 192.168.2.1 DNS 192.168.2.1
    DHCP setup:
    Device IP: 192.168.0.1
    Subnet: 255.255.255.0
    DHCP Server
    Range 192.168.0.50/254
    DNS: Use DNS from ISP
    Dual Wan:
    Load Balance
    I'm no IT expert at but I have set up a few routers before that was close to "plug and play"
    My problem is that connected computers indicate that they are connected to Internet, but I'm not able to access any websites.
    When trying to use windows troubleshooter it indicates that there is a DNS problem.
    I'm not even able to connect to the modems.
    Installed latest firmware and done a fabric restore.
    Network is built as follows (still working as I'm not running anything trough the lrt224 before I can get it to work)
    ADSL Modem with built in DHCP and Switch --> Switch --> Ubiquiti Unifi AP --> User
    Some of the AP's is connected via Ubiquiti NanoStation (wireless bridge between 4 houses, works great)
    Any idea how to get this to work or do I have the wrong router? 

    I recommend:
    Modem1 (192.168.1.1)=> LRT WAN1 (192.168.1.254)
    Modem2 (10.10.10.1) => LRT WAN2 (10.10.10.254)
    LRT WAN1 SN (255.255.255.0)
    LRT WAN2 SN (255.255.255.0)
    LRT WAN1 GW (192.168.1.1)
    LRT WAN2 GW (10.10.10.1)
    LRT WAN1 DNS (192.168.1.1)
    LRT WAN2 DNS (10.10.10.1)
    System Management => Load Balance
    LRT DHCP Device IP (192.168.200.1)
    LRT LAN => Switch => Ubiquiti Unifi AP => User
    Nothing other than the LRT's connected to the modems.
    If the modems DHCP is set to 192.168.1.x and 10.10.10.x subnet 255.255.255.0 then DHCP setting will work on the LRT WANs.
    Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
    Linksys
    Communities Technical Support

  • Configuring 2 css11503s for multiple service load-balancing

    first here's my present config on one of my CSS11503:
    !************************** CIRCUIT **************************
    circuit VLAN33
    ip address 19.10.28.211 255.255.255.0
    ip virtual-router 2 priority 110 preempt
    ip redundant-vip 2 19.10.28.210
    ip critical-service 2 UpstreamRouter
    circuit VLAN200
    ip address 10.15.15.251 255.255.255.0
    ip virtual-router 1 priority 110 preempt
    ip redundant-interface 1 10.15.15.1
    ip critical-service 1 UpstreamRouter
    !************************** SERVICE **************************
    service BrowServ-1
    ip address 10.15.15.21
    redundant-index 1
    protocol tcp
    port 80
    active
    service BrowServ-2
    ip address 10.15.15.22
    redundant-index 2
    protocol tcp
    port 80
    active
    service UpstreamRouter
    ip address 19.10.28.1
    active
    !*************************** OWNER ***************************
    owner BrowServ_Owner
    content BrowServ_Rule
    add service BrowServ-1
    add service BrowServ-2
    vip address 19.10.28.210
    redundant-index 1
    active
    !*************************** GROUP ***************************
    group BrowServ_Group
    vip address 19.10.28.210
    add service BrowServ-1
    add service BrowServ-2
    redundant-index 1
    active
    here are my questions:
    1) how do I configure an additional vip address? e.g. I'd like to configure a vip - 19.10.28.215 to load-balance http traffic to 10.15.15.25 and 10.15.15.26?
    2) I presently have a static route in my core router "ip route 10.15.15.0 255.255.255.0 19.10.28.210". (this enables the load-balanced servers to connect to Oracle servers on the Core network). do I need to configure a new route on my core router when I add the additional vip 19.10.28.215?
    relevant references and/or examples will be much appreciated.
    dayo

    1/ configure the following :
    service web1
    ip address 10.15.15.25
    active
    service web
    ip address 10.15.15.26
    active
    content WEB
    vip address 19.10.28.215
    proto tcp
    port 80
    add service web1
    add service web2
    active
    2/ I would create a redundant-interface and point your static route to this redundant ip address.
    you should not use vip address in static route.
    VIP address should only be used when you want to reach the vip address not a when you want a direct connection to the real server.
    Gilles.

  • Load Balancing issue on RAC setup

    1. We have a Oracle RAC cluster having two node say node1-vip and node2-vip
    2. We have two client software (both uses weblogic as app server) say ANP and HDM
    3. We configure connect string for HDM by giving node1-vip as primary and node2-vip as secondary. Here is the connect string we provide
    jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node1-vip)(PORT=1521))(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node2-vip)(PORT=1521))(FAILOVER=on)(LOAD_BALANCE=off))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVER=DEDICATED)(SERVICE_NAME= anpdb)))
    4. We configure connect string for ANP by giving node2-vip as primary and node1-vip as secondary. Here is the connect string we provide
    jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node2-vip)(PORT=1521))(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node1-vip)(PORT=1521))(FAILOVER=on)(LOAD_BALANCE=off))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVER=DEDICATED)(SERVICE_NAME= anpdb)))
    We are observing that connection for HDM is only going to node1-vip however connection for ANP sometime goes to only node2-vip however sometime it is getting distributed between node1-vip and node2-vip. Whenever there is more connection on node1-vip than node2-vip then connection for ANP is only going to node2-vip however whenever number of connection at node2-vip is equal or greater than node-1 vip, connection for ANP gets distributed between node1-vip and node2-vip
    Thanks
    Sumit

    Hi,
    jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node1-vip)(PORT=1521))(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node2-vip)(PORT=1521))(FAILOVER=on)(LOAD_BALANCE=off))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVER=DEDICATED)(SERVICE_NAME= anpdb)))
    Why have you put *(LOAD_BALANCE=off)* ?
    And from your post, you are not trying to use actual load balancing.
    You are trying to give connectivity like this HDM->node 1 and ANM->node 2
    In that case you need tp specify only one server vip address.
    When you configure the connection entries like above, when a new user session connection is requested, listener will connect the user to whichever address is reachable at that time.
    Hope you got my point...
    Regards,
    Mahesh.

  • Aggressive Load Balancing = unstable network

    Last week we upgraded 26 WLCs 4400 controllers from version 5.2.178 to version 6.0.188.0/6.0.196.0.
    Two days after the upgrade, IT-administrators had reported problems with 15 of the WLCs.
    The symptoms was:
    - Problems conntecting to SSIDs
    - Unstable network when connected
    - Clients didnt get a IP-adress
    - Unstable signal strength
    After some troubleshooting, it turned out "Aggressive load-balancing" was enabled on the WLCs having these problems.
    Output from one WLC:
    (Cisco Controller) >show load-balancing
    Aggressive Load Balancing........................ Enabled
    Aggressive Load Balancing Window................. 0 clients
    Aggressive Load Balancing Denial Count........... 3
                                                        Statistics
    Total Denied Count............................... 5873 clients
    Total Denial Sent................................ 14067 messages
    Exceeded Denial Max Limit Count.................. 2924 times
    None 5G Candidate Count.......................... 8215 times
    None 2.4G Candidate Count........................ 2331 times
    Yesterday we ran this command on these WLCs:
    config load-balancing aggressive disable
    ..and the problems now seem to have dissappeared.
    Aggressive load-balancing is disabled as default in the newest versions of WLC software, but we have upgraded since version 4.0.155.5 (where I think this was enabled as default), and I guess this setting was enabled because of that.
    Some info from cisco.com about aggressive load balancing:
    Aggressive load-balancing works at the association phase. If enabled and the conditions to load-balance are met, when a wireless client attempts to associate to a LAP, association response frames are sent to the client with an 802.11 response packet that includes status code 17. This code indicates that the AP is too busy to accept any more associations.
    It is the responsibility of the client to honor, process or discard that association response frame with reason code 17. Some clients ignore it, even though it is part of the 802.11 specification. The standard dictates that the client driver must look for another AP to connect to since it receives a "busy" message from the first AP it tries. Many clients do not do this and send the association request again. The client in question is allowed on to the wireless network upon subsequent attempts to associate.
    Just wanted to post this in case others are experiencing problems like we did

    Tweak your RF. You need to adjust the TX power and the data rates. The reason you have one AP with 9 clients is probably because that AP has the lowest TX power setting like 7-8. Make each AP the same TX power level, depending on how many AP's and how big the room is. You will need to play around with this and the data rates to achieve what you want.
    Here is a guide to look at too
    http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/education/cisco_wlan_design_guide.pdf
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • Multiple ISP load balancing

    Hi All,
    I am having three ISP link at location and I want to use all of them for my outgoing Internet traffic,Can anyone help me how can I accomplish this.
    Thanks
    SS

    What is the routing protocol used in your router?
    Is all three links are connected in a single router?
    Generally, if you add three default routes to three links with same AD, it does equal cost load balancing. Also if CEF is runnig, by default, it does per destination load balancing. 

  • Multiple wan load balancer

    Hi team,
    I have 4 ISP connected to a router when one ISP goes down I need to manually change to another ISP 
    Is there any utm box which support auto load balancer 

    I am also looking for the solutions for this problem. You got any solution then Please share with us.
    Regards
    Abhishek

  • Recommended configuration for load balanced Portal with load balancer, multiple gateways and multiple servers.

    Does anyone have a recommended network, hardware and software configuration guide for a Portal installation running with multiple gateways load balanced (ie one URL) that talk to multiple servers?

    David,
    We've used Resonate (software) to load balance the gateways. It allows
    you to group all the gateways under 1 virtual URL and load balance the
    incoming connections over each gateway depending on the rules that you
    define in Resonate. Look in the SUN portal whitepapers there is one that
    talks about it specifically.
    As far as load balancing the calls to the portals, the gateways will
    automatically load balance across all the portals that they know about
    using a simple round-robin rotation. You may be able to use Resonate in
    front of the portals but you may need to activate persistance within
    Resonate to ensure that the user always ends up on the portal that he
    established his initial connection on (if you want that), check with Sun
    on this one.
    David Broeren wrote:
    Recommended configuration for load balanced Portal with load balancer,
    multiple gateways and multiple servers.
    Does anyone have a recommended network, hardware and software
    configuration guide for a Portal installation running with multiple
    gateways load balanced (ie one URL) that talk to multiple servers?
    Try our New Web Based Forum at http://softwareforum.sun.com
    Includes Access to our Product Knowledge Base!

  • Best way to load balance VPNs

    I have two ASA 5540s that I would like to configure for VPN load balancing. I had been looking at the Active / Standby configurations, but am curious if doing this I can truly get VPN load balancing or if this means all VPNs on the active unit and then when a failure happens all VPNs go over to the standby unit. This isn't what I want.
    I have found some documents that talk about setting up a cluster. But I think these documents are telling me not to configure the two ASAs as a active / standby failover pair. Does that make sense?
    Anyway - what is the best way to accomplish VPN load balancing? In our setup these ASAs will only be handling VPNs (no firewalling will be done here).

    An active/standby failover pair configuration will provide for resiliency in the event of a hardware or software failure. One ASA is "Active" while the other is in a "Standby" mode. Config and state information is synchronized between the two devices. Only one ASA services client connections at any given time.
    Load balancing, on the other hand, allows you to configure a "cluster" with multiple participants. Each participating ASA can service client connections thus sharing the load. The following doc gives a good overview of load balancing and provides sample configurations.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/vpnsysop.html#wp1048959

  • Manual load balancing or tnsnames load balancing

    Hussein,
    We have 2 nodes apps (apps1 and apps2 both on separate machine) connecting to a 2-node Rac database (db1 and db2 both on separate machine).
    We want to implement loadbalancing on the 2 apps servers . I "heard" in can be done using the tnsnames.ora load balancer? Or I am just out of this world. :)
    Thanks a lot,
    Ms K

    Hi;
    Please check below and see its helpful:
    11i RAC JDBC & Listener Load Balancing Configuration [ID 244366.1]
    Implementing Load Balancing On Oracle E-Business Suite - Documentation For Specific Load Balancer Hardware [ID 727171.1]
    Load Balancing in 11i [ID 148516.1]
    How To Ensure Load Balancing Of Concurrent Manager Processes In PCP-RAC Configuration http://ID 762024.1
    Configuring 11i For Load Balancing [ID 117421.1]
    JSP Error After JDBC Load Balancing Implementation [ID 269208.1]
    How To Setup Load Balance For Workflow 2.6.3 [ID 311803.1]
    Regard
    Helios

  • Could not retrieve Enterprise Global Template - Load balancer issue

    Hi,
    We have 4 Project Server 2010 servers. The 4 web servers are load balanced by networking team with sticky session configured.
    When we try to connect to the Project Server using MPP 2007 SP2, it fails saying 'Could not retrieve Enterprise Global template'. It works perfect when we point to a specific server by specifying the IP address for server name in the 'hosts'
    file.
    Earlier we observed some errors in the event viewer related to the SharePoint's internal load balancer for which restarted the 'Project Server Application' on each web server and it got fixed.
    Now, the only entries that we see related to load balancer are as mentioned below as Information (not errors).
    SharePoint Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event: Initialization
    Process Name: w3wp
    Process ID: 15080
    AppDomain Name: /LM/W3SVC/539065287/ROOT-1-130462463500778047
    AppDomain ID: 2
    Service Application Uri: urn:schemas-microsoft-com:sharepoint:service:ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b#authority=urn:uuid:9f626d347784423eb14bde4a1f4d13fc&authority=https://lonms12546:32844/Topology/topology.svc
    Active Endpoints: 4
    Failed Endpoints:0
    Endpoint List:
    http://lonxxx2532:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
    http://lonxxx2545:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
    http://lonxxx2546:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
    http://lonxxx2566:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
    Could the issue be due to network load balancer?
    Could the issue be due to Sticky session configuration on the load balancer.?
    How can we get to the root cause of the issue?
    Which logging category should we set to 'Verbose' that can give us some hint.
    Update: We tried to capture the requests through fiddler and observed that when fiddler is running on the client computer then the connection works perfectly fine even through the load balancer. Probably fiddler is reformatting the SOAP
    envelop of the web service requests the way it should before sending the request to the server.
    If we do not run fiddler and run some other similar tool (like Charles) then it again gives the issue and the request stucks at /PWA/_vti_bin/psi/winproj.asmx
    We ran Wireshark on the servers and found the following for that web service call:
    [TCP Previous segment not captured] Continuation or non-HTTP traffic.
    Please let me know if someone could provide any hint what can be done next.
    Regards, Amit Gupta

    There are several ways to configure your load balancer.   I would suggest that you work with the network engineer, the load balancer vendor and your project administrator to resolve this issue. 
    Basically you need URL to be resolved correctly.  Also, I don't believe PS2007 did a good job handling load balancing, so you may need to bring someone in good with IIS and see they can tweek IIS to manage the cache better.
    As I go back and look at your analysis, I think you should probably look at upgrading to Project Server 2013.  They made some improvement in load balancing and the management of distributive cache.
    I assume you have 4 WFE because you have thousands of project users.  Roughly how many  you have?  Over 1000, over 5000
    Have you tried to see if using two load balancing work?  How about just one front end.  I often see companies scaling SharePoint and Project server to extremes. 
    Michael Wharton, MVP, MBA, PMP, MCT, MCTS, MCSD, MCSE+I, MCDBA
    Website http://www.WhartonComputer.com
    Blog http://MyProjectExpert.com contains my field notes and SQL queries

Maybe you are looking for