Multiple Network Object pointing to same IP address

I have what i hope is not a unique problem. I have two ISP's and I want to be able to use failover between the two ISP's. The problem I cannot seem to overcome is that I want to be able to have outside email come in and connect to the same server. If I put in the config below into my ASA, it returns an error that I cannot have two network objects pointing to the same IP.
Is there a way around this?
I'm running v9.1 for my ASA.
object network mail-server
host 192.168.1.10
object network mail-server2
host 192.168.1.10

This might be a problem with the code, you can do that with previous codes.
You can use the same object multiple times and it will work just as if you had two of them.
The following would be a workaround for that issue, but it has to be a problem with the code
object network mail-server
host 192.168.1.10
Object service MAIL
service tcp destination eq 25
nat (inside,outside) source static mail-server service MAIL MAIL
nat (inside,outside1) source static mail-server service MAIL MAIL

Similar Messages

ASDM multiple network objects vs group for rules

I was just curious if there are any performance benefits of using multiple network objects on multiple rules vs consolidating them into fewer rules by grouping them?
For example, I have about 10 lines of NAT exempt rules from the same source to multiple destinations. Is there anything to be gained if I consolidated those into a single rule using an object group for the multiple destinations aside from cleaning up the clutter in ASDM?
Thanks

Hello Tony,
Of course, it will be better because the processing that the ASA is going to use to determine witch rule to match would be decremented, also it would take less space on the configuration file (memory). those are some of the pros regarding creating groups for particular rules.
Sometimes a huge configuration file can increment the CPU usage,etc,etc. so it is better to keep it as small and organized as possible.
Please rate helpful posts.
Regards,
Julio

Cant login multiple network accounts on the same client?

Setup:
I have created a simple Lion Server on a new i7 Mac Mini. I have configured Open Directory in Master mode and have setup 4 user accounts. I have enabled the File Sharing service and checked the "Make available for home directories" option on the "Users" file share. I have configured each of the 4 user accounts to use this location as the home folder. I have connected my client machines (all OSX Lion) to the Network Account Server.
Problem:
I can log one user into the client machine, but when using "Fast User Switching" and logging on as the second user I get the following error:
"You are unable to log in to the user account "guestaccount" at this time. Loggin to the account failed because an error occured"
In the console if I search for that user account the related error message is:
11-07-31 12:30:54.993 PM authorizationhost: ERROR | -[HomeDirMounter mountNetworkHomeWithURL:attributes:dirPath:username:] | PremountHomeDirectoryWithAuthentication( url=afp://inntaserver01.local/Users, homedir=/Network/Servers/inntaserver01.local/Users/guestaccount, name=guestaccount ) returned 16
Any thoughts as to why the Home Folder "mounter" failed in this scenario?

Historically you have never been allowed to use Fast User Switching to log in multiple network logins on the same client machine. This certainly applied with Tiger, Leopard, and Snow Leopard. I have not yet personally tried this with Lion.
I believe that the underlying reason for this not being allowed is down to how AFP volumes are mounted. The AFP mount becomes 'owned' by the user that triggers the login. With a network login the first user becomes the owner and this means subsequent attempted network logins are denied access to that share and hence cannot access their home directories.
With Tiger, Leopard, and Snow Leopard servers, one could configure network home directories to be shared via NFS instead of AFP. NFS gets treated a lot different in terms of mounting, and is done more at a system level than a user level. While again I have not personally tried Fast User Switching with NFS shared home directories, this approach is specifically recommended by the authors of AquaConnect (a Macintosh Terminal Server solution) in order to allow multiple logins on the same Terminal Server. This seems to be for the same underlying reason. Using NFS does certainly work for use with AquaConnect and also works for the competing iRAPP Terminal Server product as well.
Unfortunately, Lion Server while it can be made to run an NFS server, will not let you configure using NFS for sharing home directories. I have actually reported this as a 'bug' in Lion server.
Neither the authors of AquaConnect or iRAPP have actually tested this scenario with Lion server yet, but AquaConnect do plan to investigate it. It could make it considerably more difficult to use their products.
So in summary, using NFS to share network home directories in theory would avoid the problem and can be done with a Tiger/Leopard/Snow Leopard server, but cannot be done with a Lion server. It is possible however to mix Lion with older server versions. This might for some people be a possible workaround.
PS. A bonus side-effect of using NFS shared home directories was that this allowed badly written software like Adobe's applications which are otherwise notorious for having major issues with network logins and home directories to work without errors. As an example Adobe Acrobat Pro introduced a bug in version 7.0 which prevented it being able to print-to-PDF (one of the major reasons to buy Acrobat Pro). It tooks two years for them to eventually fix this in Acrobat Pro 8.1 (I know because I spent that two years nagging them to fix it and was a beta tester). Unfortunately they then reintroduced the bug in Acrobat Pro 9.0. Fortunately I discovered this side-effect got round the issue although a clunkier workaround was also possible for Snow Leopard clients by redirecting certain folder paths.

RE: multiple named objects with the same name andinterface

David,
First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named anchored
objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get most of the
behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service (BindObject
method) it will first look in the local partition and see if there is a
local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and manually
registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating your
own SO without defining it as such in the development environment. BTW in
response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as well. If
your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the service object he is
calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance of the
service object.
Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no local copy
you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which one!
It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of my head and
without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
All,
More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
objects with the same name in more than one partition. There are two
situations in which this seems desirable:
1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value to
remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it has
environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote method
call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possible to
place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) in each
partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided. This
would only be useful for a service object whose state could be safely
replicated.
2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a Service
Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the called Service
Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same name
and the same interface in each partition, but varying the implementation
with the partition.
Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thing or a
bad thing?
David N. Foote
Consultant
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

David,
First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named anchored
objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get most of the
behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service (BindObject
method) it will first look in the local partition and see if there is a
local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and manually
registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating your
own SO without defining it as such in the development environment. BTW in
response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as well. If
your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the service object he is
calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance of the
service object.
Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no local copy
you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which one!
It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of my head and
without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
All,
More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
objects with the same name in more than one partition. There are two
situations in which this seems desirable:
1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value to
remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it has
environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote method
call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possible to
place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) in each
partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided. This
would only be useful for a service object whose state could be safely
replicated.
2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a Service
Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the called Service
Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same name
and the same interface in each partition, but varying the implementation
with the partition.
Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thing or a
bad thing?
David N. Foote
Consultant
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

Can multiple apple IDs have the same billing address??

So yea is it possible for multiple or more than one apple IDs to have the same billing address, like those created for use by members restrictively within a specific family for example??

It is possible but no more than 3 different Apple IDs for the same credit card. If you need more than three (more members of the family or a small business with 4 or more people who need individual Apple IDs) you can use one or more iTunes gift cards instead of a regular credit or debit card.

CSS11500 SSL handling question for multiple url/FQDNs with the same ip address

I know that it's possible on the CSS to handle multiple incoming HTTP requests that terminate on the same IP address and port and balance them to various servers based on the url. For instance, I can set up www.cats.com and www.dogs.com at the same 192.168.35.12 address in DNS, and set up two different content rules:
content cats
vip address 192.168.35.12
port 80
url "//www.cats.com/*"
add server cats1
add server cats2
active
content dogs
vip 192.168.35.12
port 80
url "//www.dogs.com/*"
add server dogs1
add server dogs2
active.
Easy and straightforward.
But what if I want to add SSL handling for https://www.cats.com and https://www.dogs.com?
I'm not sure how to create the ssl-proxy-list where one content rule (ip address/port) combination needs to pass through the ssl module and get matched with the proper ssl certificate.
Can this be done? Can one associate multiple certs and keys with a single ssl-server entry and a single ssl accelerator service? Or do I have to create multiple ssl-proxy-lists for cats and dogs and build multiple ssl services each referring to a unique ssl-proxy-list, and then use the url parameter in the https content rule to determine which ssl service (and therefore which key/cert pair) gets the traffic?
Thanks in advance for any insights.

Hi Tim,
Unfortunately this is not possible; you can't associate multiple certificates to a single proxy list due to the fact that SSL handshake is done first with no visibility of the URL being requested, so the CSS won't know which public server to use in order to perform the traffic decryption.
But there are a couple of options that you may want to look at (depending on the URL string)
If your URLs are subdomains and you hold a wildcard SSL certficate to match multiple requests, i.e your domain being "pets.com" you can have a certficate that will match request for dogs.pets.com or cats.pets.com because the cert will be in the form *.pets.com
The second option is SAN (Subject alternative names) certificates; which give you the option to include up to 4 flavors of the domain within the same file, such as pets.com, pets.net, www.1pets.com.
I hope this helps.
Pablo

Another device on the network is using the same IP address

While this question has been asked within the community, I cannot find an answer that solves my problem. This happened about a year ago and was thought to be a modem/router issue. I switched to Airport and all had been fine until a few weeks ago. Now I periodically can't get online from my laptops.
Settings for my macbook at System Preferences ▹ Network ▹ Advanced ▹ TCP/IP are:
Configure IPv4: Using DHCP
IPv4 Address: 192.168.1.84
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
Router: 192.168.1.254
Configure IPv6: Off
We did recently get a new ipad and new wireless printer so one of them may be the issue
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!

If you are having IP addresses assigned using DHCP and one of the devices is disconnected from the network for a long enough period of time then the router will make that IP address available to another device to use. If the first device then comes back on the network with the same IP address it had before then you'll get the dual IP address situation. This usually doesn't happen since the returning device is SUPPOSED to ask for a new IP address when it re-joins the network. In your case this may not be happening.
What I do is use static IP addresses for all the devices on my home network. In your case I think this will fix your problem.
Set up your Airport to 'reserve' specific IP addresses for the devices in your local network via their MAC addresses.
Open the airport utility, select your router, click EDIT, select NETWORK.
In the area marked DHCP Reservations: click on the + sign
Type a description of the device.
Use the pull-down menu to select "Reserve Address By: MAC address"
enter the MAC address in the appropriate line.
enter in the unique IP address for each device that you want to reserve. Make sure its in the same subnet (ie. 192.168.xx.yy)
click SAVE
Repeat the above for all your devices.
Update your airport settings.
When you're done turn off all the wireless devices for 5 minutes and then reconnect. Each should then reconnect with the same IP address each time. You can still leave the devices themselves set to use DHCP so that when you take them outsider your network, they'll request an IP address from the new network.
I hope this made sense. If not, post back and I'll calrify anything you need.

Question about multiple resource objects using the same OID target account

In Oracle Identity Manager 11g with OID connector as a target system.
Is it possible to create multiple resources that use the same OID IT Resource. Each resource is responsible for provisioning certain OID attributes of the same OID account. For example 'OID User' would provision the basic account and a separate resource called 'Department1 User' would provision attributes not provisioned by OID User.

Yes, definitely. Here is how it would work:
- You would have to make sure that the resource OID User always gets provisioned first, so that the account exist when these additional attributes are being set for the user via the other resource Department1 User. You can do this with Resource Dependency in OIM.
- Now for using the same IT Resource, just create the new form and in the IT Resource type form field, map the properties to the same IT Resource Definition, so when the Provisioning Process gets invoked it uses the same IT Resource instead.
Thanks
SRS

How to add multiple 3D objects into the same scene (photoshop cs5 extended?

I have about 13 different 3D objects, each on their own layer, and I want them to be able to cast shadows from lights all on the same ground plane. I know the setup for an individual object but when I go to set it up for each one they keep generating their own ground plane and the end result is no where close to where I want them. Does anyone know if this is possible or if there is a workaround? It's vital for this project I'm working on and I can't find any guide for the 3D features in the extended edition that is free.

It's vital for this project I'm working on and I can't find any guide for the 3D features in the extended edition that is free.
The Help?
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/photoshop/cs/using/index.html
Have you checked out 3D > Merge 3D Layers yet?

Is there a way to put multiple text objects in the same frame but with different timings?

Windows 7
Adobe Premiere Elements 12
Beginner User
I am editing a video of my self talking to the camera and would like to impose text on the screen to highlight what I am saying. When I am discussing each point I would like them to appear as text separately.
Imagine the video of me standing and talking to the camera
"Today I am going to talk about travelling in the North of Scotland and give advice on how to get by. I will talk about the best value hostels " - the word 'hostels' appears first at the top right of the screen
"I will describe the best routes to take" - the word 'routes' now appears under the the word 'hostels'
"And finally, I will describe the best places to eat traditional Scottish cuisine" - the word 'food' now appears under 'routes'.
Apologies if this seems basic but the documentation is focuses on using one title or the set effects. I suppse I am trying to create a presentaiton style of video.
Cheers

SunnyKSood
The quickest approach that comes to mind is
a. create 3 separate titles in the Titler (Text Menu/New Text/Default Text)....
food, goes on Video 4
routes, goes on Video 3
hostels, goes on Video 2
Arrange them so that when viewed they are viewed as
hostels
routes
food
b. Move hostels (Video 2) to where you want it to start in relation to
"Today I am going to talk about travelling in the North of Scotland and give advice on how to get by. I will talk about the best value hostels " - the word 'hostels' appears first at the top right of the screen
Move routes (Video 3) to where you want it to start in relation to
"I will describe the best routes to take" - the word 'routes' now appears under the the word 'hostels'
Move food (4) to where you want it to start in relation to
"And finally, I will describe the best places to eat traditional Scottish cuisine" - the word 'food' now appears under 'routes'.
c. When all that is done to this stage, it might look like this...
Now to arrange and drag out track content so that we see
hostels
then hostels + routes
then hostel + routes + food
when they are supposed to appear in conjunction with the video's dialog.
The final workspace should look like
Please give this a try. And, do not hesitate to let me know if you need clarification on anything described.
We will be watching for your results.
Thank you.
ATR

How to deny other hostname or domain name pointing to same IP address in MySQL

Im using Cento 6.5
and
MySQL version 5.6.25
For example:
IP address:
192.168.1.250
this IP has 2 domain name
1. db.mysqldatabase.com
2. web.mysite.com
i want to block or deny the 2nd domain name in database hostname
if i update our Mysql Connection should be like this
$connection=mysql_connect("db.mysqldatabase.php","userdemo","demo");
$db=mysql_select_db("db_demo",$connection);
?>
But if i use also web.mysite.com i still connected i want to use web.mysite.com as my url website
and db.mysqldatabase.com as my database connection.
is it possible?
Thanks
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hi Linda, are you referring to the Domain Name showing in the Connectivity Tab of the Linksyssmartwifi utility? The Domain Name is automatically assigned by Comcast. This setting will depend on the type of internet connection that is set up for you by your ISP. Can you give me more details of your Internet connection set up? I'd like to see how it goes. Did Comcast provide you a new Domain Name?

Can I use multiple sa-ns500 on the same network?

Is it possible to use multiple sa-ns500 speakers on the same network? they seem to want to have the same name on the network and therefore only 1 will connect at a time? Can I rename one somehow? Thanks!

Hello Brian,
Welcome to Sony Community.
Please check for the Secure Link option in the Home Theater System or A/V Receiver. This will help isolate the connection to the different Network speakers.
Yes, you can use multiple Network speakers on the same home network.
You can change the Device name using the Setting screen on the browser.
Follow the steps mentioned on the page # 34 and 35 of the User’s manual to start up the browser of the Network speakers and change the Device name.
If my post answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution."

Macbook Air has the same IP address as another device on my network

I recently connected airport extreme to my network, and now I cannot connect to the Intenet from my MacBook Air. The error message I get is that another device on the network is using the same IP address (192.168.1.64) I also have a mcbook pro, which is working fine, and whose IP address is 108.66.128.91, so I don't know which device has the duplicate IP address.
Furthemore, I can't connect to the new WiFi signal from my iPhone. What do I need to do to fix these errors?

I would recommend that you do the following as a minimum:
Power-down the modem, AirPort base station, and computer(s).
Power-up the modem; wait at least 10-15 minutes to allow it adequate time to initialize.
Power-up the AirPort base station; wait at least 5-10 minutes. Note: The AirPort's status light may continue to flash amber after it has intialized. That is because, there may be some additional configuration items necessary, like setting up wireless security, before the overall setup is completed to get a green status.
Power-up your computer(s).
If the above steps do not solve the problem, start over with step 1 above, but then perform the next steps between steps 1 & 2. above.
Disconnect the AirPort base station from the Internet broadband modem.
While all of the devices are powered-down, perform a "factory default" reset on the base station. This will get it back to its "out-of-the-box" configuration and make setting it up much easier, especially if you use the "Assist me" process within the AirPort Utility. (ref: Resetting an AirPort Base Station or Time Capsule)
After the base station resets, go ahead and power it back down.
Reconnect the AirPort base station to the Internet broadband modem. For the Extreme and Time Capsule, be sure to connect the cable to the base station's WAN (circle-of-dots) port.
Continue with step 2 in the first set of steps.
In this basic configuration, the AirPort base station will broadcast an unsecured wireless network with a Network Name (SSID) of Apple Network NNNNNN. Network clients, connected to the base station either by wire or wireless, should now be able to access the Internet through the ISP's modem. Once Internet connectivity has been verified, you can use the AirPort Utility to configure the base station for wireless security and any other desired options. Please post back your results.

Same IP address and multiple domain names

Hi all,
Is it possible to have multiple domain names sharing the same IP address? For example, I want www.mydomain1.com, www.mydomain2.com, and www.mydomain3.com to share the same IP. Thanks.
Mike Lam

Thanks JavaApplet,
but I'm still having the same problem,
I have typed
in both server.xml and apps-abc.xml and apps-123.xml:
In server.xml:
<Host Name= "www.abc.com" debug="0" appBase="webapps" unpackWARs="true">
<Context path="/abc" doc="c:\Tomcat3.3a\webapps\abc" ...>
</Context>
</Host>
<Host Name= "www.123.com.sg" debug="0" appBase="webapps" unpackWARs="true">
<Context path="/123" doc="c:\Tomcat3.3a\webapps\123" ...>
</Context>
</Host>
So in apps-abc.xml:
<Host Name= "www.abc.com" debug="0" appBase="webapps" unpackWARs="true">
<Context path="/abc" doc="c:\Tomcat3.3a\webapps\abc" ...>
</Context>
</Host>
So in apps-123.xml:
<Host Name= "www.123.com.sg" debug="0" appBase="webapps" unpackWARs="true">
<Context path="/123" doc="c:\Tomcat3.3a\webapps\123" ...>
</Context>
</Host>
but how come, the www.123.com.sg still doesn't work, it kept displaying the page cannot be found. It's very funny because if I typed www.abc.com/123/index.jsp, surprisingly the page can be displayed.
This is a very tough problem for me and I have spent a long time troubleshooting this problem.
Hope that some advice can be given ... thank a million
Regards,
Shirleen

Creating Multiple Resource Objects for OOTB Connectors

All,
I am trying to create a second AD User resource object for the OOTB connector. I would like to think that the AD Connector (and all connectors, for that matter) was designed to handle the creation of multiple Resource Objects for the same Resource Types, but am I wrong? It doesn't seem like the OIM Connector can handle this easily.
Has anyone created multiple resource objects for a connector? Is this a fairly simple task, or will it require a large effort? Is it even possible? Any pointers?
Thanks!

I will provide a little help with the duplication. I found the best way to do it is to import the original connector. Go through the different pieces making each one have a unique name, that is not part of any of the other piece names. You need to have unique names for the following:
1. Resource Object
2. Process Definition - Provisioning
3. IT Resource
4. Form - Process
5. Scheduled Task
After you import the connector, rename each of the following to something unique. I would also update your process form to have a default value of your IT Resource, as well as your scheduled task values to point to the new unique names. Export the 5 items, no dependecies. The adapters will all be the same. Use find and replace for the values and then import the new XML. If it works, duplicate the XML for each of the new workflows you want to create.
-Kevin

Multiple Network Object pointing to same IP address

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for