Multiple Port Mapping

Hey all, I've bounced around here and the knowledge base a bit and couldnt find my answer.
I have a range of 120 ports that I need to forward to my computer. I've already got everything with static IP and a couple ports working like a top.
Basiclly I'm wondering if its possible to forward a range of ports instead of having to 120 seperate entries.
I'm aware of the dmz option but would rather not have it wide open.
Thanks all!

You're correct in your analysis and this would have worked. Turns out the telephone adapter, TA, is a router (although ATT Callvantage said it was not). I brought in a local apple dealer's network sensei and he first changed the IP address of the TA to 10.1.1.201, just outside the range that my APE assigned to my computers and APE's. But, the TA needed multiple ports forwarded, including the range of 10,000 to 11,000. This killed that approach. What was done is that the TA was connected between the APE and the DSL modem. This seems to be working very well.
The network tech saidn that the lack of ability of the APE to both forward more than 20 ports and no ability to forward a range of ports is a huge drawback. The tech said that he uses a Linksys router for his own personal network.
I f I didn't use wireless printing and the APE with my iTunes, I'd betempted to can the APE. I am very disappointed in Apple.
Regards, Axxel

Similar Messages

ACE: a class-map with multiple ports... what about the probe/serverfarm?

Hello Gilles,
One question about something I was not able to find in the documentation.
Lets say I have one class-map which includes 2 ports (in this case https and 5061).
Can I associate this class-map to just 1 generic serverfarm and probe for both ports or I have to specify 2 serverfarms/rservers/probes?
So, by not specifying the ports on the rserver, if a request is received on port 443 (or 5061), it is sent to the same respective port on the rserver?
The same way is valid for the generic probe. ACE module is able to probe both ports based on the class-map?
Thanks and have a great day!!
Giulio.
probe tcp PROBE_GENERIC_TCP
description This probe works for all TCP services by inheriting the VIP port.
interval 15
faildetect 2
passdetect interval 15
passdetect count 2
open 2
rserver host SERVER1_ACCESS
ip address <1AC>
inservice
rserver host SERVER2_ACCESS
ip address <2AC>
inservice
serverfarm host ACCESS-SFARM
probe PROBE_GENERIC_TCP
rserver SERVER1_ACCESS
    inservice
rserver SERVER2_ACCESS
    inservice
class-map match-any OCS_L4ACCESS
2 match virtual-address x.x.x.176 tcp eq https
2 match virtual-address x.x.x.176 tcp eq 5061
policy-map type loadbalance first-match OCS_L4ACCESS
class class-default
    sticky-serverfarm ACCESS_STICKY
policy-map multi-match POLICY
class OCS_L4ACCESS
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy OCS_L4ACCESS
loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
connection advanced-options OCS_VIPTIMEOUT
nat dynamic XXX vlan 503

Even if you use the 4710 appliance or expect the inheritance in the module software, it's worth considering if this is really what you want. If you keep multiple ports in the L3/L4 class-map you can't handle the services independently. You will have a common serverfarm for both https and 5061. If https service stops on one rserver, the ACE will place that rserver (and not that service) in out-of-operation state and it won't receive any 5061 traffic either. (You have the fail-on-all probe option but I wouldn't say it's a better choice. In that case, https traffic would be sent to the rserver even if https port is closed as long as there is at least one working service on it.) That's why I prefer a separate class-map and separate serverfarm for each service. (They can contain the same rservers, no need to duplicate.) BUT if the software supports probe port inheritance, you can benefit from it even in this scenario: serverfarm-443 and serverfarm-5061 can both use your PROBE_GENERIC_TCP.

Port Mapping Inconsistent

I am having trouble getting port mapping to work consistently.
I have configured by Airport base station to forward 5 ports to iMac: 6880, 6881, 6969, 9090, and 9091. It appears that one of these is forwarded correctly, but the others are not.
When I go to https://www.grc.com/x/portprobe=9090 I'm told that the port is open. However, when I substitute any of the other ports, they appear to be closed.
I'm also not able to visit websites that use port 6969.
Any ideas what could be going wrong with this? There are multiple users on this machine (with fast user switching). Could that be part of the problem?

Is there any way to tell without disconnecting my Airport and connecting my Mac directly to the cable modem? I did some googling, and did not find anything about my ISP (RCN) blocking ports other than 25.

Listen on multiple ports for smtp?

Traditionally, we've provided setup smtp to listen on an additional port to 25 for travellers who find themselves on an ISP which blocks that port. We used a line in master.cf like:
<newportnumber> inet n - y - - smtpdproxywrite unix - - n - 1 proxymap
This seems to make snow leopard's postfix unhappy. It also doesn't work. I'd be grateful if anybody could tell me:
* what is or where to look for info on setting up postfix to do multiple ports? I've tried Apple docs and found nothing and only old-style in postfix docs -- though I could be missing something obvious as always.
* is this the modern and preferred way to get around the blocked port 25 problem or is it better to do some fancy-schmancy port redirection eg at the firewall to map multiple ports on to port 25 for postfix?
thanks and allbests,

In the past I've used the following with great success. Add the following line to /etc/postfix/master.cf file:
2525 inet n - n - - smtpd
Stop and start the mail service. Then test with telnet to ensure that the port is responding. Sadly, this still appears to be the best way, sans the use of a VPN, to get around ISP blocking.
Obviously port 25 needs to be open to receive mail. But instead of opening additional port in the firewall, you could drive all users to VPN.
I just tested the above line in 10.6.1 and it is responding.
Hope this helps

Static unicast MAC entry in multiple ports Cat6500VSS

Hello, I'm trying to configure a static mapping of a MAC address in two different ports on a Catalyst 6500 switch.
My situation is: I've configured a Cluster of Firewalls which exposes a unicast MAC addres for the cluster virtual interface. The situation is that the MAC address is a unicast one, and when the swith sees the MAC from multiple ports, it gets confused and starts doing flooding in all the VLAN.
The configuration I'm trying to do is for a McAfee Firewall conected to 2 Catalyst 6500 in VSS mode. Here is the article of the firewall vendor with the recommended configuration: https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=KB61307&actp=null&viewlocale=en_US&showDraft=false&platinum_status=false&locale=es_ES
What i want to do is to configure unicast mirrored mode, and in that mode, I have to run this command on Catalyst 6500 and I can't:
mac-address-table static 000e.a210.440a GigabitEthernet 1/1/3 GigabitEthernet 2/1/3
Note that the mac address is a unicast one
How can I do That? Any help will be appreciated

Hello,
There is a fundamental architecture difference between the 2 platforms regarding the internal forwarding of frames. With the 3550 the notification packet is sent after a lookup and the results index can contain more than one entry where as with other architectures the results are limited to a single entry. Basically that is why you can configure an ARP entry to point to different ports on the 3550 versus other platforms.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
James

ERROR OWS-04045 during accessing multiple ports based web service

I use WSA to publish a web service which have multiple ports.
The ant build script :
<oracle:assemble appName="${app.name}" ear="${app.name}.ear"
targetNamespace="http://www.xxx.com" classpath="${domestic.class.path}"
input="${web.home.path}/WEB-INF/classes" output="${archive.output.path}"
style="rpc" mappingFileName="type-mapping.xml" appendToExistingDDs="true"
serviceName="${app.name}">
<oracle:porttype interfaceName="com.xxx.service.ICompanyDefinerWebService"
className="com.xxx.CompanyWebServiceImpl">
<oracle:port name="company" uri="company" />
</oracle:porttype>
<oracle:porttype interfaceName="com.xxx.IUserDefinerWebService"
className="com.xxx.UserProfileWebServiceImpl">
<oracle:port name="userprofile" uri="userprofile" />
</oracle:porttype>
</oracle:assemble>
There is a class name UserDTO which extends another class AbstractDTO, which locates in another package. I used a type-mapping file for giving them different namespaces.
After deployment, I can use the url http://localhost:8888/xxx/userprofile to access the web service. OC4J provided a javascript based stub for testing.
But I met some problems. When I use the web stub to access it , error occurs.
ERROR OWS-04045 Malformed Request Message:Caught exception while handling request: unexpected element name: expected={http://www.xxx.com/framework/bean}operationRecord, actual={http://www.xxx.com/user/dto}operationRecord
I switched the form to display in xml before invoke, I found there are different and correct namespaces on these 2 elements (UserDTO and OperationLog) .So, I'm very strange why the server will response such a fault information.
In addition, if I use default style (just document-wrapped) to publish web service, almost all methods can not be accessed on web stub which is provided by oracle.
Surely, the problem is caused by multiple port. The soap specification is 1.2 and JDK is SUN 1.5.0-b6, OC4J is 10.1.3.3
I just want to konw whether oracle have some better practices or suggestion for publishing a web service which will have multiple ports.
The other problem is we can not use abstract class(only support interface) when we want to use WSA to assemble a web service based EAR.

Is it possible to use several "class L4VIPCLASS" inside the "policy-map multi-match VIPs" in order to have several VIPs to load-balance services for several serverfarms?
Something like this:
class-map match-all L4VIPCLASS-1
2 match virtual-address 172.16.1.1 tcp eq www
class-map match-all L4VIPCLASS-2
2 match virtual-address 172.16.1.2 tcp eq www
class-map match-all L4VIPCLASS-3
2 match virtual-address 172.16.1.3 tcp eq 8081
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match WEB_POLICY-1
class class-default
serverfarm-1
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match WEB_POLICY-2
class class-default
serverfarm-2
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match WEB_POLICY-3
class class-default
serverfarm-3
policy-map multi-match VIPs
class L4VIPCLASS-1
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy WEB_POLICY-1
loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
loadbalance vip advertise active
nat dynamic 1 vlan 11
class L4VIPCLASS-2
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy WEB_POLICY-2
loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
loadbalance vip advertise active
nat dynamic 2 vlan 22
class L4VIPCLASS-3
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy WEB_POLICY-3
loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
loadbalance vip advertise active
nat dynamic 3 vlan 33
interface vlan XX
service-policy input VIPs
Many thanks for your support.

Port mapping through airport

ok so i was having problems trying to do a 1 way video chat with someone on a PC I port mapped the 5000 series ports that are listed in in these discussions and hooray i got it to work...
the only problem is that my gf wants to be able to do one way chats with this person on another laptop....
first i tried duplicating what i did with the port mapping and using her internal IP address but that didnt work.... i wasnt sure it would i figured that would create a conflict....
can anyone tell me how to do this....
i guess what im trying to do is open the ports for anyone inside the my airport network
oh and this is the snow basestation

There is no way to map a external port to multiple
internal IP addresses.
I noticed your response to the "service" that was asked about, by the above poster. It seemed relevant to me, because I wanted to use the ARD "service" to, in fact, reach several computers "behind" the AEBS that I have. The ARD program would be on an outside and public IP address (in other words, "away from home").
If I understand you right, in referencing this person's "service" (here in this post) -- I suppose the same thing applies to ARD, meaning that ARD cannot access more than -one- computer behind an AEBS, from an outside and public IP address. Is that correct?
If that is correct, please look at my other post (for today) where I ask about that very thing. Thanks...
iBook G4 1.42 GHz & iMac G4 Flat Panel 800 MHz Mac OS X (10.4.8)

How do I use Port Mapping?

b How do I use Port Mapping?
(This document will assume that you are using and ABS/AEBS/AX as an internet router and have DHCP & NAT turned on.)
Sometime you may want to offer access to a computer on your AirPort network to users on the internet, whether it be a web site, or for file sharing, or just remote access for yourself when traveling. If any of these sound like something you want to do, then you need to understand how Port Mapping works.
b AirPort as Firewall
Most of the time your AirPort base station will not let any traffic into your network which did not originate from your network. It will let everything out and replies to your traffic back in, but it will not let sessions initiated on the internet side of the base station in to your network. This is what is referred to as the "NAT firewall" capability of the base station and it provides effective protection for your network from the internet. What Port Mapping does is poke a hole in this wall to allow certain type(s) of traffic into the network and direct this traffic to a specific computer on the network. In the firewall world this is commonly referred to as an "inbound proxy" or "inbound translation" rule or "PAT" (Port Address Translation) in the router world.
b The Need for Manual Addressing
Since a Port Mapping entry in the base station configuration requires an inside private IP address to be specified, the computer to which to mapping entry applies should always have the IP address specified in the mapping entry. Thus, DHCP should not be used for a computer offering services on the internet as the Port Mapping entry will no longer work if the target computer's IP address changes. In general, an Apple base station's DHCP server will try to assign IP addresses in the 10.0.1.2 to 10.0.1.200 range. IP addresses above 10.0.1.200 can be Manually assigned to computers and other devices on the network up to 10.0.1.254. 10.0.1.255 is reserved (it is the broadcast address for the 10.0.1 subnet). To Manually set up the TCP/IP information for a Macintosh running Mac OS X, go to System Preferences -> Network and "Show" the appropriate interface (Ethernet or AirPort) and click on the TCP/IP tab. Select "Configure Manually" and enter the following information:
IP address : 10.0.1.201 (or whatever address you decide to use)
Subnet mask : 255.255.255.0
Router IP : 10.0.1.1 (the AirPort base station LAN IP)
DNS server : 10.0.1.1, or whatever DNS server IP your ISP uses
After making these changes verify that your computer can still access the internet and local resources on the LAN before continuing.
b Port Mapping a service
In our example we will be hosting a web site on a computer which we have given an IP address of 10.0.1.201. Basic web sites are accessed using the HyperText Transport Protocol (HTTP) and this protocol typically uses port 80 to communicate. In order for others to see the web site, we must configure a Port Mapping entry in the base station configuration to not only allow the web browsers in, but to tell the base station what IP address the web server is using. The Port Mapping entry has three parts: Public Port, Private IP, and Private Port. In this case you would use the following values:
Public Port : 80
Private IP : 10.0.1.201 (this is the computer hosting the web site)
Private Port : 80
In order to access the web site from the internet, users must reference the base station's WAN port public IP (determined by looking at the base station configuration summary page in the AirPort Admin Utility). Since this address may change over time, you might want to use a Dynamic DNS service to simplify connecting for your users.
Sometimes the port you wish to use may be blocked by the ISP. In this case, use a different non-standard Public Port number for the service, but keep the Private Port standard. In the above example, if the ISP was blocking port 80, you could potentially use 8080 instead, so:
Public Port :

Public Port : 8080
Private IP : 10.0.1.201
Private Port : 80
Your users would then have to enter "http://<publicIP>:8080/" (where <publicIP> is the public IP address of the AirPort base station) to access the web site.
b Internal Access
It should be noted that when accessing these services from within the network you cannot reference the Public IP/Public Port, but rather you must use the Private IP/Private Port. Thus, "http://10.0.1.201:80/" in the above example.
b Limits and Options
There is a maximum of 20 Port Mapping entries that can be made in an Apple base station configuration. If you use an AirPort Extreme or AirPort Express base station there is an option which can be helpful in the case where you need many ports opened to a single computer. This is the "Default Host" option. When using this it is not necessary to use Port Mapping at all as all ports will be opened to the specified "Default Host". This is found in "Base Station Options". The default IP address for the "Default Host" is 10.0.1.253. You may change this IP address. The target computer must be Manually configured as specified above with the same IP address. Since all ports are now open to this computer, you should enable and configure the Mac OS X firewall on the default host computer to protect it from intruders.
b Useful Related Links
<a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=52002>"Designing AirPort Extreme Networks: Manuals</a>
"Well Known" TCP and UDP Ports Used By Apple Software Products
IANA Port Number Assignments

Cisco ASA 5505 - Port Mapping

Hi, I'm new into IT and I was wondering if somebody could help me set up Port Mapping. Here's my scenario -
We have set up an Asterisk VoIP server that uses UDP port 5060 and another port range, and we want any public incoming connections destined for our Asterisk server on Port 5099 to be translated at the firewall to go to our Asterisk server on port 5060. I have been using ASDM 6.4 but theres no easy way to do this (as far as I know, and why I've came here looking for an answer).
We have currently just left port 5060 open to the public (so our home workers can use our phone system) but really want to get this sorted ASAP due to SIP Bots that look for ports like 5060 that are open!!
Any help would be greatly appreciated and if anybody needs anymore information just ask!!

Hi,
You need to have a NAT rule set for port-forwarding to make as per your requirement..... I will give you cli based configuration example....
If your ASA is running with pre-8.3 version:
static (inside,outside) tcp interface 5099 192.168.1.10 5060 netmask 255.255.255.255
If your ASA is running with post-8.3 version:
object network SERVER-01
host 192.168.1.10
object network SERVER-01
nat (Inside,Outside) static interface service tcp 5099 5060
Regards
Karthik

Extended acl - multiple ports on same acl line

hello
i'm working on a (long) acl and have started looking at putting multiple ports on the same line
e.g.
instead of:
ip access-list extended test3
permit tcp any host 10.10.10.1 eq 80
permit tcp any host 10.10.10.1 eq 443
i'd use:
ip access-list extended test3
permit tcp any host 10.10.10.1 eq 80 443
its shortening the acl considerably but the question is:
does this method reduce the TCAM resources required (compared to writing the acl in long hand)?
what are the maximum number of ports that can be included on the same line - is it platform/ios dependant?
thanks
andy

Hello
No. I went ahead with the acl with multiple ports in each ACE and it worked fine. It was deployed on an old WS-C3750G-24PS-E and worked pretty well. When I checked the tcam on the switch I got the following output:
Cisco3750#show platform tcam utilization
CAM Utilization for ASIC# 0                      Max            Used
                                                         Masks/Values    Masks/values
IPv4 security aces:                          1024/1024         33/33
Note: Allocation of TCAM entries per feature uses
a complex algorithm. The above information is meant
to provide an abstract view of the current TCAM utilization
As there were other ACLs on the switch it was difficult to gauge if the multiple ports per ACE approach to ACLs actually saved any TCAM resources. If you find anything out post back - I'd be interested to hear.
thanks
Andy

Multiple ports on single node cannot communicate

I am a Sr. Tech Architect from SBC that it evaluating your product for utilization in our enterprise online order application in combination with the Solarmetric Kodo product.
I was able to install and utilize your application and line command, sample applications no problem on a single jvm utilizing multiple ports and all the members were being recognized no problem. Suddenly, they are no longer being picked up. I am using the packaged configuration xml files as is, just running multiple dos windows on a Win 2k box and launching the line command application. The only other development work I have been doing on the box is test deploys to Apache of the product along with the integration of the Kodo product in a WSAD 5.1 environment, however, I have both those applications shut down and rebooted the machine with no success. I tried running the multicast test just for kicks and got no response back. Scratching my head as to what my be the problem all of a sudden.
Thanks,
Scott

Scott,
Did you, by any chance, install and enable "Microsoft Loopback Adapter"? If so, you'd need to disable it. If not, could you please e-mail me the command line and some output of the multicast test.
Thanks,
Gene
[email protected]

Scan multiple ports on multiple computers

Hey guys,
I wrote the following batch script to use along with portqry tool which is availabe from microsoft download center.
The tool can scan multiple ports on a single computer, but it is not capable of scanning multiple ports on multiple computers in one attempt. Also it gives a big output which is a bit tough if you are trying to prepare a report.
Here is the batch file which takes input from server.txt where all the computer names present and scans for the below ports on each computer and gives you output in a beautiful way.
TCP: 135, 445, 1433, 1434, 1024, 1040
UDP: 1433, 1434
Copy and paste the below code in a batch file and use it along with portqry.exe.
echo off
for /f "tokens=* delims= " %%a in (server.txt) do call :vk %%a
:vk
portqry -n %1 -e 1434 -q -p udp
if errorlevel = 2 goto filtered_1434
if errorlevel = 1 goto failed_1434
if errorlevel = 0 goto success_1434
goto 135
:filtered_1434
Echo %1 udp Port 1434 is listening or filtered
goto 135
:failed_1434
Echo %1 udp Port 1434 is not listening
Goto 135
:success_1434
Echo %1 udp Port 1434 is listening
goto 135
:135
portqry -n %1 -e 135 -q -p tcp
if errorlevel = 2 goto filtered_135
if errorlevel = 1 goto failed_135
if errorlevel = 0 goto success_135
goto 445
:filtered_135
Echo %1 tcp Port 135 is listening or filtered
goto 445
:failed_135
Echo %1 tcp Port 135 is not listening
Goto 445
:success_135
Echo %1 tcp Port 135 is listening
goto 445
:445
portqry -n %1 -e 445 -q -p tcp
if errorlevel = 2 goto filtered_445
if errorlevel = 1 goto failed_445
if errorlevel = 0 goto success_445
goto 1433_tcp
:filtered_445
Echo %1 tcp Port 445 is listening or filtered
goto 1433_tcp
:failed_445
Echo %1 tcp Port 445 is not listening
Goto 1433_tcp
:success_445
Echo %1 tcp Port 445 is listening
goto 1433_tcp
:1433_tcp
portqry -n %1 -e 1433 -q -p tcp
if errorlevel = 2 goto filtered_1433_tcp
if errorlevel = 1 goto failed_1433_tcp
if errorlevel = 0 goto success_1433_tcp
goto 1434_tcp
:filtered_1433_tcp
Echo %1 tcp Port 1433 is listening or filtered
goto 1434_tcp
:failed_1433_tcp
Echo %1 tcp Port 1433 is not listening
Goto 1434_tcp
:success_1433_tcp
Echo %1 tcp Port 1433 is listening
goto 1434_tcp
:1434_tcp
portqry -n %1 -e 1434 -q -p tcp
if errorlevel = 2 goto filtered_1434_tcp
if errorlevel = 1 goto failed_1434_tcp
if errorlevel = 0 goto success_1434_tcp
goto 1024
:filtered_1434_tcp
Echo %1 tcp Port 1434 is listening or filtered
goto 1024
:failed_1434_tcp
Echo %1 tcp Port 1434 is not listening
Goto 1024
:success_1434_tcp
Echo %1 tcp Port 1434 is listening
goto 1024
:1024
portqry -n %1 -e 1024 -q -p tcp
if errorlevel = 2 goto filtered_1024
if errorlevel = 1 goto failed_1024
if errorlevel = 0 goto success_1024
goto 1040
:filtered_1024
Echo %1 tcp Port 1024 is listening or filtered
goto 1040
:failed_1024
Echo %1 tcp Port 1024 is not listening
Goto 1040
:success_1024
Echo %1 tcp Port 1024 is listening
goto 1040
:1040
portqry -n %1 -e 1040 -q -p tcp
if errorlevel = 2 goto filtered_1040
if errorlevel = 1 goto failed_1040
if errorlevel = 0 goto success_1040
goto 1433
:filtered_1040
Echo %1 tcp Port 1040 is listening or filtered
goto 1433
:failed_1040
Echo %1 tcp Port 1040 is not listening
Goto 1433
:success_1040
Echo %1 tcp Port 1040 is listening
goto 1433
:1433
portqry -n %1 -e 1433 -q -p udp
if errorlevel = 2 goto filtered_1433
if errorlevel = 1 goto failed_1433
if errorlevel = 0 goto success_1433
goto end
:filtered_1433
Echo %1 udp Port 1433 is listening or filtered
goto end
:failed_1433
Echo %1 udp Port 1433 is not listening
Goto end
:success_1433
Echo %1 udp Port 1433 is listening
goto end
:End

For what it's worth, I wrote a PowerShell script that does something like this a while back.
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/97119ed6-6fb2-446d-98d8-32d823867131

How do I configure my airport utility for port mapping?

I am trying to view my FOSCAM cameras over the internet while away from home. They work fine in my house using Wi-Fi. Instructions say to do port forwarding. I have cameras set up, but can't get my router to port forward. I found "Port Forwarding" in Airport Utlility then NETWORK. 'Router mode: DHCP and NAT';on 'Port Settings I click on the "+" at the bottom. 'Private IP Address: populates to 10.0.1.201'. What goes in the other blocks?

Please check out the following AirPort User Tip for details on how to configure Port Mapping on the AirPort routers. I would suggest that you check your FOSCAM documentation as to what TCP and/or UDP ports are required to access their IP cameras from a remote location.

Port Mapping is not working ?

First of all, sorry for my bad english as it is not my primary language.
So my problem is that I play Warcraft 3 and that I would like to host some games. To be able to host, I have to do port mapping for the ports : 6112-6119, which I did in the Airport Utility --> Advanced --> Port Mapping. I did it for every port 6112, 6113, etc. But the thing is that when I go on this website: http://www.whatsmyip.org/ports/games/ (Which is a website that tells me what ports are open on my computer), only port 6112 is open. Ports 6113-6119 are closed. Before my Airport Extreme, I had a Linksys and I had no problems with hosting and port mapping, which means it is not my ISP that is blocking the ports.
Also this is the setup of my internet if it can help. I have an AirPort Extreme wich is connected to the modem in my basement (I did the port mapping on this one) . From this Airport Extreme, I have another Airport Extreme connected to it. I am connected to the second Airport Extreme in bridge mode with ethernet.
I don't know if this was clear or not lol. Anyway I would appreciate any help. Thank You !

This is just a guess, but if you still have that AirPort Extreme, you might plug it in long enough to have AirPort Utility do a File >Export Configuration File, then reconnect the Time Capsule and do a File > Import Configuration File. Once that's done you may have to do a little adjustment to account for the disk drive.

Port Mapping is not working on Time Capsule

I have replaced my Airport Extreme with a Time Capsule for back up purposes, but the Port Mapping functionality is not working as it did on the Airport Extreme. I have my security camera DVR connected to the network and am using Dynamic DNS to resolve the WAN IP Address. HAs anybody any experienced this problem with Time Capsule?

This is just a guess, but if you still have that AirPort Extreme, you might plug it in long enough to have AirPort Utility do a File >Export Configuration File, then reconnect the Time Capsule and do a File > Import Configuration File. Once that's done you may have to do a little adjustment to account for the disk drive.

Multiple Port Mapping

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for