Multiple users directed to different home or index pages.

I would like to have different users directed to different home or
index pages after they log on to Weblogic. We are running v5.1.
THanks

Well, maybe you can have a look to our example formauth.
After login, you call securytest.jsp. Here, depending of the user you can
redirect him to the right page.
Romuald RICHARD
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support
"Scott" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
>
Thanks Richard,
How can this be accomplished?
"Romuald RICHARD" <[email protected]> wrote:
After your users are logged in, you can call a jsp which will do the
right
dispatch, no?
Romuald RICHARD
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support
"Scott Rodenhiser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
I would like to have different users directed to different home or
index pages after they log on to Weblogic. We are running v5.1.
THanks

Similar Messages

  • Multiple users and shopping carts, one searchable index?

    Hi all,
    I've got an idea but I would like to know if it possible with Business Catalyst. I'll try and explain as simply as possible:
    I have multiple users (let's say 10). They all need separate shopping carts as they are all selling different products. They all need their own admin areas that keep track of their incomes, workflows, shopping carts, etc. They are essentially 10 independent users. Will the WebCommerce10 plan satisfy their needs, or will 10 separate WebCommerce single plans need to be sold?
    Taking the above into account, is there anyway to have 10 independent shopping carts, but they can all be searchable simultaneously? e.g. think eBay, lots of users with their own independent admin areas and products, but one search field returning many results from all the user's shopping carts? Is there anyway to achieve something like this with BC? Can subdomains do this? Any other ideas how to achieve this if none of the above is possible?
    My plan B is having a landing page where a link for each of the 10 users will take them to their relevant shopping carts, but this experience isn't quite as integrated as I would like, from a web surfer's point of view.
    Thanks.
    Clint,
    Komma Media

    Hi Robbie,
    Yes, this would require significant modification to the shopping cart functionality. As it is now, it's very dependent the ShoppingCart being associated with the session and therefore the user. To change that would be significant work.
    Additionally, if you had two people logging in to the same account and editing the same order around the same time, this would tend to not to work well. This is because two users would be two sessions and they would often get routed to different app server instances. Because the way orders are managed, there's no way to immediately sync up the changes between multiple instances, and if you managed to do it would likely slow things down drastically. I would not recommend trying this with ATG.
    Thanks.
    Nick Glover
    Oracle Support for ATG Products

  • Multiple users same account different roles

    Hi,
    How could I do this in thunderbird?
    There is only one email account. Under the only one email account, there is a manager who have all the privileges. There are some users accounts who can only read and reply emails. Users accounts can't delete any messages.
    Thanks,
    James

    Hi Scotch,
         It is possible for multiple users to use the same connection key/login credentials in multiple machines to edit their webpages using Contribute.
    If some page is placed in edit mode, Contribute will show an info bar for the same
    If you are an admin it will show the info bar saying
    Please revert back for any more clarifications.

  • What is the best way to load multiple instances of a button into master index page?. I have looked a

    I have successfully created an animated button that opens to reveal a quotation with a nested clickable link to the source. What I would like to do is have several of these with different quotes inside them, scattered on the page. I have looked at the composition loader available via Edge Commons, and it seems that would require some sort of Edge animate Stage 'frame' to load the instances into? Is there any way to place them directly into the master page - as div elements...?
    The outer of the buttons is the same, on hover they open partialy on click fully, to reveal  their particular text - which I thought about loading it at runtime with json, or maybe handlebars...?
    I would also like to make the buttons only take the necessary space. ie. before they expand they are only buttons. ( I have set the stage to hidden but it still takes up space). To acheive this, I think perhaps I will have to target the inner components css, and set them as display:none until the button is hovered over, then set :hover and :active pseudo classes inside edge. Is this feasible?
    Thanks in advance for any ideas/suggestions...

    Hello, Thanks for your helpful input. Based on that, and the tutorial 'http://tv.adobe.com/watch/learn-edge-animate-cc/ingesting-external-data-dc/' - I have written code to drive my button's behaviour.  (copied below...)
    var textArray =new Array();
    var currentHead = 0;
    var currentText = 0;
    var currentFoot = 0;
    var s = sym.getSymbol("textContainer");
    sym.$("textContainer")$.("text").html("");
    var sh = sym.getSymbol("headContainer");
    sym.$("headContainer")$.("head").html("");
    var sf = sym.getSymbol("footContainer");
    sym.$("footContainer")$.("footer").html("");
    $.getJSON("assets/sources1.json", function(data){
              for (var i=0; i<data.length; i++){
                        textArray.push({"head":data[i].heading,
                                  "text":data[i].text,
                                  "footer":data[i].foot,
                                  "link":data[i].link});
              sym.$("headContainer")$.("head").html(textArray[currentHead]).heading;
              sym.$("textContainer")$.("text").html(textArray[currentText]).text;
              sym.$("footContainer")$.("foot").html(textArray[currentFoot]).foot;
              sym.$("footContainer")$.("link").html(textArray[currentLink]).link;
    But there is an error I don't understand at line 7...
    Also - as you can see, at present I have several symbols in parallel. Would I be better off nesting the text containers inside the outer button container? and would I be better off creating styled mini- pages of text data, and then loading them - instead of loading them as symbols? I have had to create seperate symbols because I cannot adequately stle the text - so some is bold, some is italic etc. within one text field. Or can I? I guess I could nest several text fields inside one symbol...?
    I remain unsure how to load the finished animation button instances. In your example you were still loading into an animation But from yor example, I guess I would need to place all my examples inside an outer edge composition... but then I think positioning them accurately with css, making adjustments etc. will be fairly tricky. Is there any way to place multiple instances directly into divs in index.html? Could I simply repeat the class...? I may be answering my own questions here.

  • Multiple Users, One PC, Different GB iPods

    We have 1 iPod that has 4 GB of memory. We got that first and have a lot of songs in iTunes already.
    Now we have a new 1 GB iPod. How do I have my own separate library for this iPod and how do I put songs onto the iPod? I've been trying, but I can't figure out how to download a playlist alone or a segment of songs in the library to the smaller iPod.
    Any info appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Have a look at this article: "How to use multiple iPods with one computer" http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=300432
    You may want to set your smaller iPod to manual update that way you can drag whatever songs or playlists you choose to it: "Managing Your Songs Manually" http://www.apple.com/support/ipod/tutorial/ipgettingstartedt3.html
    For info:
    The iPod offers three ways to transfer music from your computer. You can select one of the following update modes from the iPod Preferences menu in iTunes (Edit=>Preferences=>'iPod' tab):
    1) Automatically update all songs and playlists. This is the default mode, in which your entire music library, including playlists, is automatically synced to your iPod. If the music library on your computer exceeds the iPod storage capacity, you are prompted to select a different update method.
    2) Automatically update selected playlists only. With this option, iTunes automatically copies the playlists you have selected to the iPod when you connect it to the computer.
    3) Manually manage songs and playlists. You can also choose to transfer music to the iPod manually. This allows you to drag and drop individual songs and playlists from iTunes to the iPod.

  • Hyperlinks directed to different section of same page?

    Is this possible in iWeb? What I want is to have a menu bar at the top of one of my pages that links to different sections of the same page since its a really long page. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

    There is a way using HTML snippets. See Peter Berglund's post in this thread: http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9044022#9044022 and then go to his blog for more info.
    I've used it in the Contents page for my demo sites. The links in green are to "anchors" on the pages indicated.
    The hyperlink would be http://web.me.com/MMeAccount_Name/Site_Name/PageName#widgetX with X being the number of the widget just above the area you want to direct to. You'll have to publish the page and the change the X until you get the location you want (particularly if you have more than one widget on a page). The widgets are numbered in the order they were created.
    OT

  • PDF for multiple users with different values

    Is there a way to create a PDF to be sent to multiple users but have different values in the PDF? For expample employee A's offer letter is for $50/hour while employee B's offer letter is for $55/hour. But they have the same offer letter just with different values.
    I have Enterprise EchoSign and FormsCentral.
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    Thanks for asking, but FormsCentral currently does not support this.
    Perry

  • IWeb '09 and creating an "Index" page for two separate sides of my website

    I'm redesigning my website with iWeb '09 seeing that I've recently switched to Mac from being a life-long PC/Windows user. I'm not too web programming savvy so iWeb fits my needs as a very good program that redesigns my site very nicely (and quite inexpensively, as well).
    My current incarnation of my website (http://www.jeffreykern.com) was designed by a professional web designer on Dreamweaver for PC a couple of years ago. Some time ago when I was trying to update my PC with XP SP 3 (bad idea as it turned out), my connection to my web hosting service got completely fouled up and I lost the ability to update the site and haven't updated my site since. Knowing that I was going to be switching to Mac (with my new Mac Pro) I never had the desire, or energy, to patch things up to update my site with my PC. Plus, I was in need of a redesign so I eventually got my site ready to go with iWeb 09. That's where I stand right now...
    So, as you can see on my current site I have a main index page that splits up into the two sides of my life: the triathlete side and the writer side. I've already redesigned both sides of my site with iWeb, I'm ready to update it thru my web hosting via FTP and Transmit 3, but I cannot find how to create a main "Index" page on iWeb that will let me branch off into two different directions. By having that "Index" page intact I will be able to keep my domain of jeffreykern.com as it currently stands. I don't mind having to get two different domains for each of my two sides of my site but would like to avoid that extra step -- if, at all, possible.
    Thanks in advance for your help,
    Jeff

    Building three websites on three separate domain files would be my choice.
    Its important to realize that you cannot have a page called "index" using iWeb because the associated index.html file will conflict with the one that iWeb creates.
    As has been suggested, the first site would be one page. The site name would be jeffreykern.
    This site will publish as jeffreykern_files and an index.html file. Inside this folder is another index.html file. This is the one your domain name will be directed at if you don't need an RSS feed.
    If your server allows it, create a root folder on it called "jeffreykern" and upload the contents of the local folder to this and ignore the separate index.html file. Note that I said contents and not the folder itself.
    A lot of servers require that you upload to a pre existing folder. In this case you will have to upload the index.html file and the jeffreykern _files folder.
    The two other sites are named and published as writer and triathlete. The external index files of these two sites are renamed writer.html and triathlete.html.
    These two files and their corresponding folders are uploaded to your root folder on the server after adding tags and optimizing.......
    http://www.iwebformusicians.com/SearchEngines/SEO.html
    Now you have a main (one page) site with two sub sites.
    The domain name http://www.jeffreykern.com/ is directed at the index.html file so that when this is entered into the browser, the main page will appear.
    The links to the two main sections, whether they be text and/or image, are created and selected as external hyperlinks.
    http://www.jeffreykern.com/triathlete/
    http://www.jeffreykern.com/writer/
    Clicking these links will open the first page of their respective sites.
    If you do the sensible thing and trash the iWeb default navigation to replace it with a custom one, you can include external hyperlinks to the landing page and the other site in this.
    The website - iWeb for Musicians - is created like this and is built on 9 separate domain files for ease of updating and publishing. The whole site is tied together with a Main navigation to get to each section which has a Sub navigation to jump around that section.
    For more on navigation see.....
    http://www.iwebformusicians.com/WebMusic/Navigation.html
    Also refer to Fonts, Colors and Navigation on this page ......
    http://www.iwebformusicians.com/WebMusic/iWebandInternetExplorer.html

  • Multiple users pointed to the same location as their "Home Folder"

    One of the things we need to be able to do for out work is share folders. We are project based and do not want to store the projects in the users "eDirectory User" home folder. We made some initial test assigning two users to the same "Home Folder" and shared a folder and had multiple accounts both internal and external pick-up and drop off files in the folder.
    While it appears to work, I wanted to find out if there are downsides in having 20-30 people with the same Filr "Home Folder". What are the potential "gotchas". Security (internal) isn't an issues since these network locations are accessible by all the users anyway.
    Daniel Wells AIA, VCP
    Senior Associate | IT Coordinator
    MHTN Architects, Inc.
    Direct: 801.326.3215 | www.mhtn.com
    vision made real

    Hi!
    Gotchas?
    Well, it essentially does exactly what it is supposed to do.
    (BTW, i have tested this with Filr 1.0.1 some time ago, if 1.1 behaves
    differently this would bw a MAJOR product change.)
    Given:
    Two internal Users A+B with the homedirs pointing to the exact same path
    \\Server\Dir
    One external User c@tld
    * User A logs in and creates a directory X and shares it with contribute
    rights to c@tld.
    * User c@tld logs in and creates a file X\file
    * User B logs in, see a folder X and the file with A as the author. The
    folder IS NOT shared to everyone (at least as far as user B is concerned,
    the user does NOT set the sharing details of user A)
    * User B shares the same folder X with c@tld with view only rights.
    * User c@tld clicks the link from User B and IS NOT able to contribute.
    * User c@tld is puzzled and calls User A asking why his rights have been
    revoked.... etc. etc.
    * User B has the (for him readonly) data somewhere else and calls the folder
    X obsolete and deletes it.
    * User A and c@tld are really pissed off.... etc. etc.
    * User c@tld has several different links with potentially different rights
    all pointing to the same physical location...
    etc.
    Again, it does exactly what it is supposed to do - from a technical point of
    view, but this might not be what the users/organization can
    handle/expect...
    Georg
    >>> Daniel Wells<[email protected]> schrieb am 05.11.2014 um 20:54 in
    Nachricht <[email protected]>:
    > One of the things we need to be able to do for out work is share
    > folders. We are project based and do not want to store the projects in
    > the users "eDirectory User" home folder. We made some initial test
    > assigning two users to the same "Home Folder" and shared a folder and had
    > multiple accounts both internal and external pick-up and drop off files in
    > the folder.
    >
    >
    >
    > While it appears to work, I wanted to find out if there are downsides in
    > having 20-30 people with the same Filr "Home Folder". What are the
    > potential "gotchas". Security (internal) isn't an issues since these
    > network locations are accessible by all the users anyway.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Daniel Wells AIA, VCP
    > Senior Associate | IT Coordinator
    > MHTN Architects, Inc.
    > Direct: 801.326.3215 | www.mhtn.com
    > vision made real

  • Multiple users logged into one server, each users printer has a different name, application needs ONE name to print to.

    Multiple users logged into one server, each users printer has a different name, application needs ONE name to print to. 
    I'm NOT in any way a Terminal Services expert and I need help trying to get an application program working in a multi-user environment.
    The issue is that the printer changes for every user that is logged in. The application needs to print NOT to the default printer, but to a "special" printer which is selected in the application... let's call it a label printer to simplify the explanation.
    You have your default regular printer, easy for the application to find that one, and then you have a special printer that labels get printed onto. The application needs to know what printer is the label printer. So we allow the user to select that in the
    application and the selection is stored in a config file in 
    C:\ProgramData\mfgr\prog\setting files
    I don't have access to the application so I can't change how this works.  
    In the "regular" world, selecting the label printer driver to use should be per machine, NOT per user. When a new user logs into a machine, the physical printer doesn't go "poof" and a new printer suddenly appear. Same printer for all
    users.
    Yet in terminal services, the physical machine is "merged" with the virtual machine on the server. And there can be many users logged in at the same time. So each users real machine (and real printer) is injected into the "fake" terminal
    services machine. The name of the printers is made unique for each user. So the printers DO go "poof" and change names depending on the user logged into terminal services.
    So user "A" logs in and sets up the application to print to "LabelPrinterForUserA" (or whatever the name of the printer happens to be), that setting is stored in the ProgramData subfolder, and all is well. Later, user "B" logs
    in, and when they print, the application tries to print to "LabelPrinterForUserA" which doesn't exist for user B or is only accessible by user A. If user B re-configures, that breaks it for user A. 
    SOLUTION 1: The way that /should/ work (in my mind) is that you define one "generic" printer in Terminal Services... call it "Virtual Label printer" and when the user wants to print to it, the print job gets re-directed back to whatever
    physical printer is actually connected to their local workstation. There is a map of virtual printer to actual printer depending on the current user. The application is told once to print to "Virtual Label Printer" for all users.
    SOLUTION 2: Or... there should be some way to make the ProgramData sub folders separate per user. E.g. when user "A" tries to access:
    C:\ProgramData\mfgr\prog\setting files
    they actually get 
    C:\UserData\UserA\AppData\mfgr\prog\setting files
    and user "B" gets
    C:\UserData\UserB\AppData\mfgr\prog\setting files
    So the question I have is: Does either of those solutions exist hidden somewhere in the setup of terminal server? Or is there another way around this issue that I don't know?

    I don't really have a "for sure" answer to this, but because people here can't seem to deal with a question that hasn't been answered I'll provide the best answer I did receive from ServerFault.com user Nathan:
    I can feel your pain with using old software on terminal servers ...the solution I've come up with definitely won't scale as it requires some manual configuration, but I've gotten this method to work with our label printers (which require to be
    printed to an LPT port...yep, that old).
    Share your USB-connected printers to the network on each machine. Then, have the user log in on aunique session for each of them
    (a TS account cannot be shared among computers for this to work) and install a network printer pointing to the USB one they shared. Try to use a DNS name to account for possible DHCP movements.
    After, it should work. Each user can do this since display names can be identical as long as the ports are different (which they are).
    This was clarified by the following series of comments:
    I think you are on to something here, and I originally advised the admin to do this. The problem he ran into is that it setup the printer names in the TS as "printer on usersworkstation"
    and he could not rename it except to change the "printer" to whatever. E.g. the "on userworkstation" remained. I believe there is another way of installing the printer which avoids this, but I can't find it. Ages ago, one used to do NET
    USE LPT2 \\computer\printer password /USER:domain\user /PERSISTENT:YES and then tell the driver to print to LPT2 –  James
    Newton Mar
    17 at 16:21   
    @JamesNewton That's actually the exact method we used. The way around the "network printer" part is to install it as local printer and map it to a TCP/IP port that way. –  Nathan
    C Mar
    17 at 16:28
    You mean in the case where the printers are TCP/IP connected and not local USB / LPT to the users workstation? That makes sense. Wonder if this will work for USB connected printers... –  James
    NewtonMar
    17 at 16:35   
    @JamesNewton You'd share the local printer on the client's PC then on the server connect via TCP/IP to it. You'd need static addresses or use DNS names if DHCP, though. –  Nathan
    C Mar
    17 at 16:51
    Ah. Yes. I see. Looks like the LPT thing should work even with a USB connected printer:superuser.com/questions/182655/… –  James
    Newton Mar
    17 at 17:09   

  • Can you have multiple users working off the same Mac pro at the same time with multiple monitors but doing different things?

    I'm buying desktops for a start up company and was wondering if I could purchase a single Mac Pro and run multiple monitors to allow multiple users to work on the computer at the same time. These users would be doing different tasks but I would hope to accomplish that on a single desktop. I know that screen sharing is possible but with only one user controlling both of the screens. Thanks in advance, sorry for my apple ignorance!

    A lot of companies are buying or leasing laptops to be used at the office by day, and carried home at night.
    Some companies are doing "Bring your own device". Bring a device to receive email -- computer/smartphone/tablet you already have, or have an allowance to buy one for your use.
    If Capital is short (and when is it not) leasing computers, to be turned in a few years, can be a huge savings because the cost is expensed as incurred. The alternative is laying out cash today, but not being able to expense the cost this year. Instead, the computer expense must be recovered over their useful life (often five years) through depreciation.

  • Multiple users on home LAN sharing both the Music folder and library

    Hi there,
    I've been hunting around the web and not found anything that helps me with this specific situation though various articles come close but I've not actually succeeded yet, I was wondering if anyone can help.
    I have a Windows XP home PC, 2 user login profiles, both share the same music folder but have different librarys.Using Itunes 10.
    I've recently purchased a NAS, I have successfully moved the music folder to the NAS and now also have a netbook (windows 7) seeing the same music folder.
    What I want is to have any users/PCs to have the same music folder and the same library on Itunes.
    Where I come unstuck is the library as I want the library from the primary user on the PC to be the master, I want this located on the NAS and I want any machine/user to share this same library. I know it's the Itunes folder in My Music, I can easily move that but most forums suggest starting Itunes holding down shift andselecting a new library but I do not get this option.
    Instead, I go into the library options but the library command to compile (can't remember exactly that command) seems to retain the local library store.
    Is there a way I can just add my NAS located music folder and point Itunes to a different itunes folder for the library?
    Separately, I'd like to know if there is an option to keep a local copy of the music and photos folders, I'd like the netbook to be able to this as a backup of the NAS.
    Really appreciate any help on this.
    Thanks.

    It is not really practical for multiple users on different PCs to use the same library database. This is because the iTunes database is not multiuser, the can however share the same content files.
    So each PC will need it's own library database (iTunes Library.itl) which in this case is best located on the users own PC.
    Utilities such as Tune ranger can keep libraries in sync:
    http://www.acertant.com/web/tuneranger/
    For backup, some people find synctoy a free utility from Microsoft works for them.
    http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=c26efa36-98e0-4ee9-a 7c5-98d0592d8c52

  • Home Sharing and multiple Users

    We have one Mac with one user (me) and another Mac with two other users. If we have Home Sharing turned on for all three users, should each user be able to see the other two iTunes libraries, or will only the currently logged in user on the 2-user computer be available? Example: If User 1 is logged in, can they get User 2's library, and can I get both User 1's and User 2's libraries from the other computer?
    And does iTunes have to be launched on a given computer for its library to show up on another computer, or will my iTunes find the library where it resides on the other computer even if their iTunes is not on?

    It is not really practical for multiple users on different PCs to use the same library database. This is because the iTunes database is not multiuser, the can however share the same content files.
    So each PC will need it's own library database (iTunes Library.itl) which in this case is best located on the users own PC.
    Utilities such as Tune ranger can keep libraries in sync:
    http://www.acertant.com/web/tuneranger/
    For backup, some people find synctoy a free utility from Microsoft works for them.
    http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=c26efa36-98e0-4ee9-a 7c5-98d0592d8c52

  • Multiple users at home (one calendar)

    How do 2 different users on the same iMac share a calendar created in iCal?
    My husband has created a calendar in iCal under his user name. I would like this to be our master calendar for the home. How do I access and/or update whatever calendar he has created? I am the admin.
    Linda

    Here's how to share iCal calendars among multiple users on a single Mac.
    What you need to do is to move the iCal folder to a shared folder that is accessible to all users and then replace the iCal folder in each user's library folder with a "symbolic link' to the shared iCal folder. The symbolic link looks like an "alias", but if you try this using "aliases" to the shared iCal folder it will not work (trust me). You can create symbolic links using the Terminal, but I have no idea how, and the idea of using the Terminal scares me. The easiest way that I know of to create a symbolic link is with a shareware application called Cocktail. It allows you to do a number of different things including System Maintenance, Network Optimization, etc. It took me a while to remember how to do this; I originally found the information in the Discussions when iCal was first released, but apparently none of those original postings are listed in the forums anymore.
    Here's how to do it (you must have Administrator privileges):
    First locate your iCal folder (your user name > Library > Application Support > iCal) and make a copy of it (Finder > File > Duplicate). Drag the copy to your Desktop until you're sure iCal is being shared between users.
    Next move the original iCal folder into a Shared folder in the Users folder (Hard Disk > Users > Shared > iCal). To make sure all users can access the information, select the Shared folder, choose File > Get Info, click the little Lock icon, then under "Ownership & Permissions -> Details" make sure that the "Owner" is "System", "Group" is "Wheel" and "Access" for Owner, Group and Others is "Read & Write". Do the same with the iCal folder within the Shared folder, but this time, under "Ownership & Permissions -> Details" make sure that the "Owner" is "your user name", "Group" is "Staff" and "Access" for Owner, Group and Others is "Read & Write" and click the "Apply to Enclosed Items" button. I basing this information on what the Ownership & Permissions are for each of the folders in my system.
    Open Cocktail (I'm using version 3.6.5). Once the app is open (you must enter an administrator's user name and password) click on the "Files" button, then click on the "Links" button. Where it says "Create Symbolic Link" click on the "Choose" button. Navigate to the iCal folder (Hard Disk > Users > Shared > iCal) and click "Choose" again. In the "Save As" box that appears enter "iCal", then navigate to the Application Support folder in your Home folder (your user name > Library > Application Support) and click "Save". Quit Cocktail and open iCal. You should see all of your calendars as you did before.
    Log in under each additional User, move that User's iCal folder (user name > Library > Application Support > iCal) onto the Desktop, then create another Symbolic Link to replace it, using Cocktail as described above. In each case you should see the same calendar information as when you were logged in under your user name. As a test, add a New Event or To Do in iCal under one user, log out and back in under another user and you should see the changes when you open iCal.
    Once everything appears to be working, you can delete the iCal folders from each User's Desktop.
    As an additional maintenance measure, use Disk Utility to repair Disk Permissions.
    Unfortunately, if each User has his/her own calendars in iCal they will not be in the shared calendars. Only the calendars in the first iCal folder used to set up the shared folder will be available and I don't know of any way to merge or combine the other user's calendars into one.
    Hope this helps and good luck!

  • How do I set up multiple users with different configurations

    I have a Mac Pro that is shared by multiple users. Some edit using Avid Media Composer 6.0, and some edit using Final Cut Pro 7. Our client monitor is connected using a Matrox MX02 Mini. When I install the latest drivers for the Matrox MX02, I can use the client monitor with Media Composer, but not Final Cut Pro 7. When I back-rev the drivers to support Final Cut Pro 7, I can't use the MX02 in Media Composer.
    Is there a way to set up two users -- one for Avid editing and one for Final Cut editing -- that will each load different sets of drivers?
    Thanks!

    Not in one boot system. The only way I can think of doing what you want is to dual-boot - ie, either partition a single drive with two volumes, one for each configuration, or, if you can, use separate physical drives. The Matrox drivers are loaded at the system level, not the user level.
    If you have a spare drive, you would just clone your system across using Carbon Copy Cloner / SuperDuper, then boot to the second system and adjust the drivers as necessary.
    Matt

Maybe you are looking for