Mx.core.Window - prevent user from closing the window?

Hi,
mx.core.Window has properties 'maximizable' &
'minimizable', but there doesn't seem to be any 'closable'
property. In my application I'm creating another window (apart from
the main application window) that needs to be open the whole time
the application is running. If I can't prevent the user from
closing the window, then I'll have to rig up some code to
automatically re-open it if the user closes it. I'm hoping there's
a way to prevent the user from closing the window in the first
place though.
I'll much appreciate any ideas - thanks :)

Listen for the window's closing event and call
preventDefault().

Similar Messages

Prevent user from closing the applications

Hello,
we would like to deploy to our users web application using Internet Explorer which is published over RemoteApps. Because this application takes long time to load we would like to prevent user from closing application. So we would like that session and application
stays opened when the user clicks on close button on Internet Explorer that is published over RemoteApps.
In other words, we would like to disconnect client from RemoteApp session, but stay logged in and keep the application running in the background.
Is this possible to do?
Thank you!
Best wishes,
Marko

Hello,
thank you all for your answer. I guess this is not a good news. Any other idea how to solve this problem - to start Internet Explorer web application as soon as possible.
Last week I have found a VB script on one forum that would close the RemoteApp Windows without closing the appliaction on server but I can't find it today. Does anybody know something about this script?
Thank you!
Best wishes,
Marko

Is it possible to prevent users from using the ''Purge'' option from the ''Recover deleted items'' in Office 365?

Hi,
After speaking with a Microsoft engineer over the phone, I've been told that there is no way to prevent users to go to their OWA and manually Purge specific items from the ''Recover deleted items''. The Microsoft tech told us to place the desired mailboxes
on a litigation-hold and that all data will be recoverable... but only from the time you place the mailbox onto Litigation-Hold and previous items, which doesn't take effect for new-coming emails.
1- From what I understand, any new items coming in the mailbox after the Litigation-Hold is put in place will still be ''purgeable'', right?
2- Is there a way (PowerShell, Security group, etc.) that can prevent a user from using the Purge option?
We are very surprised that there is absolutely no thread that talks about this issue, which in our opinion, is a major legal and security flaw from Office 365. This is a main concern for us to actually go with Office365. For instance, this means that at
any given time, if a user exchanges emails with a competitor, they can manually purge emails sent and receive as soon as it is sent/received, even after Litigation-Hold is in place.
Thank you for your reply and let us know if you have more questions.
Normand Bessette, IT support technician, Newad Media

Thank you for the reply.
Is there still a way to prevent users from using the Purge option, like with a Powershell script to disable Purge?

How to prevent user from deactivating the adobe software

I am working in a training center, We've got 20 machines here installed with Adobe CS3 production premium (not using network license). The problem now i foresee is the software deactivate problem, i found user can deactivate the adobe software even they dont have XP administrator rights.
And what i know about activation of adobe software is that there is a limit of activation count of 30 tries and after that i have to call the adobe technical support for help.
Is there any way that i can prevent user from deactivating the software in terms of registry modification or what other kinds of method.
Thanks
Ivan

If you have 20 machines I assume you have a volume license, which does not require de/activation anyway.
If you have 20 separate licences... well, the only thing I can think of is to block the Adobe Activation domains of adobe.com through the firewall of your network. You should probably contact Adobe directly for more specific info.

Prevent users from printing the List of Business Partner window

Hi All
I have had this request and not sure if it possible.
He wants to prevent the users from printing the List of business partner.
That is when you do a search on the marketing documents.
when do a search it brings up the window, List of Business Partners.
they can go to file print...choose table and print the list of BP.
is there anyway to prevent that?
Thank you
Jerusha

is it a smartform
You have to disable from ADOBE end
sfpoutputparams-NOPRINT = X
when calling the function module FP_JOB_OPEN.
Unfortunately the PDF converter, which converts the output
of a Smartform, does not allow to disable the print button.
Please see note 841850 about this. Only the PDF-based forms
support this features (class CL_FP_PDF_OBJECT also belongs
to the PDF-based forms).

GPO to prevent users from accessing the root folder of their profile doesn't work

Hi,
Here's the scenario:
In a Windows 2012 RDS I created two groups called RemoteApp users and remote desktop users.
These groups are defined in the collection for the corresponding RD Session hosts.
These groups are not included in any other group, but they are located under an OU -called Remote Users.
In the domain controller I have created a GPO named "Restrict access to root drive" which is linked to the Remote Users OU.
The GPO I selected is - "Prevent users from adding files to the root of their users files folder"
This doesn't seem to work. I have waited more than a few hours to allow the 90 minutes update, plus used the gpupdate /force
but when a user clicks on the RemoteApp (Excel in this example) then access to the C: drive (which is the root folder of the user's profile) is enabled, and the user can create folders and save files under C:.
I tried to run gpresult for the specific user but the GPO I created wasn't mentioned.
I thought this would be a straight forward mechanism, but somehow it looks like something is missing.
I have read about loopback and expanding, but not sure if this is what needs to be done, and if yes - I'd appreciate if I can get step by step instructions. Everything I found so far was VERY vague.
Thanks !
One more detail that may be relevant - the DC is a Windows Server 2012, and the session host is a Windows 2012 R2.

> These groups are not included in any other group, but they are located
> under an OU -called Remote Users.
>
> In the domain controller I have created a GPO named "Restrict access to
> root drive" which is linked to the Remote Users OU.
>
The USER accounts need to be in the OU your GPO is linked to. Despite
their name, GPOs do NOT apply to groups, but to users (and computers).
Groups only provide an additional layer of filtering...
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Is there a way to prevent users from changing the Advanced, Connection, Settings Tab?

I need to stop network users from changing the proxy settings to avoid the firewall. Is there any way to disable or prevent them from getting to the advanced, connections tab, and changing the settings for the proxy?

You can lock the corresponding prefs, then users won't be able to change the settings.
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Locking_preferences
See also http://kb.mozillazine.org/about%3Aconfig_entries

Prevent User from Editing the Credit Limit Field

Hi
I would like to find out if there is a way to restrict user that has full authorisation to BP Master Data from changing a specific field on the Master Data.
The scenario is that we allow an user to edit BP Master Data but would like to prevent the user from changing the credit/committment limit fields as it has financial risk and only managers can do so.
If there any way within the stand SAP authorization that can achieve this requirement?
BR,
Jimmy

Hi Jimmy,
This would not be achievable through standard authorization. You may try SP_Transaction_Notification instead. Search within forum, there are many threads discussing this SP.
Thanks,
Gordon

I have a 1/8 inch space at the bottom read messages display which prevents me from closing the email without closing this space which comes back when reopening

The tab for closing the message is hidden at the top. When I close the gap, I can close the message. How do I permanently fix this problem so the tab will always be present?

I'm having trouble visualizing the problem. Could you possibly post a screen shot or two showing what you mean? This article has tips on that, but please blur out or box out anything confidential/personal: [[How do I create a screenshot of my problem?]]

How to restrict the user from Closing the PO when it is not matched yet

Hi,
Actually PO is finally closed in lines level without matching. Now the problem is how to restrict this in future so that the user can not finally close it when it is not matched.
Thanks
Kavya

Kavya,
Check the setup of Line Type . Check for Receipt Tolerance on the Line Type . It should not be 100%
Please let me know if you have any questions
Thanks
Navin

Prevent Someone from closing window

I am currently filling out a form on safari and there is no option to save my work so I will have to leave it up on the screen all day. My younger sibling use the computer too and have already accidentally closed it and have started over 2 times. Is there a way I can prevent someone from closing the window or lock it in any way????

Hi
Welcome to Apple Discussions
No way to lock-in a window, however, if you have administrative control of the system, you can set up a separate user account for others (System Preferences>Accounts). This way, only you have access to your files etc. in your User Account, while affording others the same in their user account.

How to prevent users from running PRC: Transaction Import from WebADI form?

Hi,
We are 12.1.3 and trying to create a workflow to approve Project transactions coming through web ADI before they become effective. To this end, we want to prevent users from running the PRC: Transaction Import from the Web ADI.
I know that if the checkbox Automatically run transaction import is not checked, the program does not run. But we want to hide this checkbox and not allow the possibility that the program could get triggered.
To this end, we updated the BNE_INTEGRATORS_B with source='C'. This allows you to edit the integrator from Desktop Integration Manager.
UPDATE BNE_INTEGRATORS_B SET SOURCE ='C' WHERE INTEGRATOR_CODE ='PAXTTRXB'
In the 4th step, where the value for Uploader Parameters is set, we have set boolean value to No. These are the fields on the page:
Parameter Name: bne:import
Display Name: Start Transaction Upload
Data Type: Boolean
Category: Field
Default Value: Boolean Flag: No
Description: start Transaction Import Concurrent Request
Display Options: Displayed: Unchecked
Display Options: Enabled: Checked
Display Options: Required: Checked
Prompt Left: Automatically submit Transaction import
Display Type: Check Box
Maximun Size: 100
Display Size:100
Now the checkbox is not appearing for the user to check it, But the program is automatically running when you hit Upload in the WebADI.

Hi ,
Try removing the PRC: Transaction Import Program from the request group for the responsibility used by customers to submit the WebADI and then check if the program launches.
Regards,
Raghavan

Prevent user from doing device transfer using desktop manager

Hi everyone,
My company would like to prevent user from using the Blackberry desktop manager to perform the device transfer. The reason is we do not want the user to have company data stored on privately-owned device. Is there a way to do that?
Thanks.

Do you want to prevent them from using the program all together, or just from using the Device Switch Wizard? If not, then what do you mean by device transfer?
If it's the Device Switch Wizard then the BES admin can set an IT Policy - http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/KB18290
If someone has been helpful please consider giving them kudos by clicking the star to the left of their post.
Remember to resolve your thread by clicking Accepted Solution.

Hi All, We are in to Release 11.5.10.2.There is a specific requirement to Prevent users from creating Manual Sales Orders in oracle and yet users should be able to book the Sales Orders Imported from CRM system into Orcale.Please advise.

Hi All, We are in to Release 11.5.10.2.There is a specific requirement to Prevent users from creating Manual Sales Orders in Oracle and yet users should be able to book the Sales Orders Imported from CRM system into Orcale.Please advise.

Thanks for your advise.
However, I missed to mention that we have two set of users One is for Finished Goods and another for Spares.
Only Spares users need to be prevented from creating Direct/Manual Sales Orders in Oracle.
As you suggested, if this will be done at Form level, that may Disallow FG users also to create Manula Sales Orders which should not be the case.
Further, I tried to test one scenario through Processing Constraints but it did not work.
Application
OM
Validation Type
Entity
Temp
Short Name
TBL
Validation Semantics
Created By
Equal To
User(Myself)
Processing Cosntraint
Application
OM
Entity
Order Header
Constraint
Operation
User Action
Create
Not Allowed
Conditions
Group
Scope
Validation Entity
Record Set
Validation Template
101
Any
Order Header
Order
Above Created
Please advise.

How to prevent multiple users from updating the same data in coherence

Hi,
I have a Java Web Application and for data cache am using coherence 3.5. The same data maybe shared by multiple users which maybe in hundreds. Now how do I prevent multiple users from updating the same data in coherence i.e. is there something in coherence that will only allow one user a time to update. If one user is in a process of updating a data in coherence and some other user also tries to update then the second user should get an error.
Thanks

I have a question on the same line. How can I restrict someone from updating a cache value when I a process is already working on it. I tried locking the cache key but it does not stop other process to update it , it only does not allow other process to get lock on it.

Mx.core.Window - prevent user from closing the window?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for