Prevent user from doing device transfer using desktop manager

Hi everyone,
My company would like to prevent user from using the Blackberry desktop manager to perform the device transfer. The reason is we do not want the user to have company data stored on privately-owned device. Is there a way to do that?
Thanks.

Do you want to prevent them from using the program all together, or just from using the Device Switch Wizard? If not, then what do you mean by device transfer?
If it's the Device Switch Wizard then the BES admin can set an IT Policy - http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/KB18290
If someone has been helpful please consider giving them kudos by clicking the star to the left of their post.
Remember to resolve your thread by clicking Accepted Solution.

Similar Messages

Prevent User from doing J1IIN for Non-Excisable Material

Hi All
I would like to prevent the User from generating an Excise Invoice in J1IIN if the Finished Product is not Excisable. Does this require any Configuration changes or does it have to be done through User Exits?
Currently in VF01, a message pops out asking User to do J1IIN if the material is Excisable. I would like to prevent the User from doing J1IIN if the Material is not excisable since this shows Zero Values against BED, ECess and SECess and lot of explanations need to be given to Central Excise Department for generating such an Invoice.
Regards
Ramana ND

1.Is System allowiing the user to DO ?
2.User Deleting only Items ?
if So then u have to activate User Exits or BADIs.
Regards
Peram

Using Yammer for page commenting in SharePoint Online, how to prevent user from doing it wrong?

I am trying to use Yammer for a per-page comment platform in a SharePoint Online environment. This seems to require placing a Yammer embed in each page
and configuring the embed to use Open-Graph. (see further below for the embed code details I'm using)
When a user begins typing their comment, a gray box also appears (not sure the technical name for it) giving the user the option to click "x" to close it. In the screenshot a little below,
I've put a green-box around it.
If the user clicks the x to close that little piece, they can still submit a comment, but it doesn't get added to the page. There's no feedback that indicates this is what happens.
It is distracting and adds unnecessary complexity to what should be a simple task of appending a comment to this page's conversation. In fact, everything I put a red box around in the screen shot
would ideally be hidden from the user.
Can we hide this complexity (everything in red box) from the commenter completely?
If not, how can we prevent the commenter from clicking the "x"
and thusly quietly breaking their feedback?
Here is my Yammer embed code:
<div id="embedded-feed" style="height:400px;width:500px;"></div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://assets.yammer.com/assets/platform_embed.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript"> yam.connect.embedFeed({
container: "#embedded-feed"
, network: "myyammernetwork.com"
, feedType: "open-graph"
, config: {
use_sso: false
, showOpenGraphPreview: false
, header: false
, footer: false
, promptText: "Comment on this page..."
, objectProperties: { url: window.location.href, type: "page" }
</script>

Hello Jason,
>> Is there a way in APEX to disable the browser back button?
This is not an APEX issue, but a general browsers one. This is an old problem, without any good solution. Usually, if this is a critical issue (like in payment pages etc.) the course of action is indeed to prevent the page from being cached by the browser, and mark it as expired.
>> however I cannot get the above to work; … by placing it between <style></style> tags
You should use the ‘meta’ tag for these attributes. The following might help you with that - http://www.htmlgoodies.com/beyond/reference/article.php/3472881 .
Hope this helps,
Arie.

Update software without using Desktop Manager

I'm trying to update my BB 8520 because it's been playing up (again) and I've tried using the desktop manger to update it but it doesn't seem to let me complete the update even though it says there is one. Is there anyway of updating it through the internet like a website or something, or does it have to be through the desktop manager?
Thanks.

See the link below for the download, and follow these simple installation instructions.
First locate your carrier and the OS file you wish to use.
http://na.blackberry.com/eng/support/downloads/download_sites.jsp
Do a backup of your device first, using Desktop Manager > Backup. Close Desktop Manager upon completion.
1. Download the OS file to the PC then install it to the PC by running (double clicking) the file you downloaded.
2. Go to c:\program files\common files\research in motion\apploader and delete the file named "vendor.xml."
3. Plug in BB and double click on "Loader.exe." It's located in the same place as the above vendor.xml file.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

When I disconnect my iphone 3gs(iOS) from computer, the device disappears from my itunes. This prevents me from doing a wireless sync. how do i fix it so that my device stays on itunes without having to plug it in all the time?

When I disconnect my iphone 3gs(iOS) from computer, the device disappears from my itunes. This prevents me from doing a wireless sync. how do i fix it so that my device stays on itunes without having to plug it in all the time?
it worked the first few times i did it but the next day after i closed out of itunes once, the device only appears when i plug in my phone.

Whenever a menu choice is grayed out, that is because you have Restrictions turned on in Settings. Be sure to turn it off.
You are confusing an itunes store account with an icloud account. You two can continue using the same ID for itunes (thus sharing purchased music, apps, etc.), but you really should have separate accounts (different IDs) for icloud, since an account is intended for one user to keep his/her devices in sync.
To create a new icloud account, go to
http://www.apple.com/icloud/setup/
Then go to Settings>icloud and scroll to the bottom of the screen and tap Delete Account. (have restrictions turned off) That will disconnect the device from the account but will not delete data in icloud or other devices. Then sign in using the new ID.

I'm an American living on a timed (though long-term) assignment in Ireland. I have both American and Irish bank accounts and addresses. I have two Qs. 1. Can I use the US Adobe site when in Ireland? Or will my physical location prevent me from doing so? 2

I'm an American living on a timed (though long-term) assignment in Ireland. I have both American and Irish bank accounts and addresses. I have two Qs. 1. Can I use the US Adobe site when in Ireland? Or will my physical location prevent me from doing so? 2. I am working for a not-for-profit organization. Is there a special pricing plan for non-profits, similar to the plans for students, small business, etc? Thanks for whatever help you can give me. (P.S. As a potential customer and past user of Adobe products for 15 years, I find it INCREDIBLY FRUSTRATING that I cannot speak with any Adobe representative, but am continually re-routed instead to a public forum to get what I hope will be accurate information. Not good, Adobe. Your products are amazing. Your customer service leaves a lot to be desired. I don't mean that with disrespect, but as honest feedback.)

Hi bookchic
Thanks for your feedback.
Non-profit pricing is available to eligible institutions via the VIP program which is sold by resellers - see Eligibility guide
For details of resellers please check here: Adobe Platinum Partners – Value Incentive Plan
If you wish to purchase an individual plan via Adobe.com the country of your Adobe ID will determine which site you order from.
Kind regards
Bev

Is it possible to prevent users from using the ''Purge'' option from the ''Recover deleted items'' in Office 365?

Hi,
After speaking with a Microsoft engineer over the phone, I've been told that there is no way to prevent users to go to their OWA and manually Purge specific items from the ''Recover deleted items''. The Microsoft tech told us to place the desired mailboxes
on a litigation-hold and that all data will be recoverable... but only from the time you place the mailbox onto Litigation-Hold and previous items, which doesn't take effect for new-coming emails.
1- From what I understand, any new items coming in the mailbox after the Litigation-Hold is put in place will still be ''purgeable'', right?
2- Is there a way (PowerShell, Security group, etc.) that can prevent a user from using the Purge option?
We are very surprised that there is absolutely no thread that talks about this issue, which in our opinion, is a major legal and security flaw from Office 365. This is a main concern for us to actually go with Office365. For instance, this means that at
any given time, if a user exchanges emails with a competitor, they can manually purge emails sent and receive as soon as it is sent/received, even after Litigation-Hold is in place.
Thank you for your reply and let us know if you have more questions.
Normand Bessette, IT support technician, Newad Media

Thank you for the reply.
Is there still a way to prevent users from using the Purge option, like with a Powershell script to disable Purge?

I use to administrate my DSL modem via an ip-address. When I enter it into FF8 I am asked where to save the file. Why and how can I prevent FF8 from doing that?

I use to administrate my DSL modem via an ip-address. When I enter it into FF8 I am asked where to save the file. Why and how can I prevent FF8 from doing that?
And now anytime I am entering an ip-address I am asked if I want to download the file.

It happens when the modem server doesn't send the file as text/html, but with another MIME type.<br />
I tried the index.html addition in case the server might send that file as text/html.<br />
If your DSL modem has a support website then you can try to ask there for advice about how to configure the modem server.

How to prevent users from running PRC: Transaction Import from WebADI form?

Hi,
We are 12.1.3 and trying to create a workflow to approve Project transactions coming through web ADI before they become effective. To this end, we want to prevent users from running the PRC: Transaction Import from the Web ADI.
I know that if the checkbox Automatically run transaction import is not checked, the program does not run. But we want to hide this checkbox and not allow the possibility that the program could get triggered.
To this end, we updated the BNE_INTEGRATORS_B with source='C'. This allows you to edit the integrator from Desktop Integration Manager.
UPDATE BNE_INTEGRATORS_B SET SOURCE ='C' WHERE INTEGRATOR_CODE ='PAXTTRXB'
In the 4th step, where the value for Uploader Parameters is set, we have set boolean value to No. These are the fields on the page:
Parameter Name: bne:import
Display Name: Start Transaction Upload
Data Type: Boolean
Category: Field
Default Value: Boolean Flag: No
Description: start Transaction Import Concurrent Request
Display Options: Displayed: Unchecked
Display Options: Enabled: Checked
Display Options: Required: Checked
Prompt Left: Automatically submit Transaction import
Display Type: Check Box
Maximun Size: 100
Display Size:100
Now the checkbox is not appearing for the user to check it, But the program is automatically running when you hit Upload in the WebADI.

Hi ,
Try removing the PRC: Transaction Import Program from the request group for the responsibility used by customers to submit the WebADI and then check if the program launches.
Regards,
Raghavan

GPO to prevent users from accessing the root folder of their profile doesn't work

Hi,
Here's the scenario:
In a Windows 2012 RDS I created two groups called RemoteApp users and remote desktop users.
These groups are defined in the collection for the corresponding RD Session hosts.
These groups are not included in any other group, but they are located under an OU -called Remote Users.
In the domain controller I have created a GPO named "Restrict access to root drive" which is linked to the Remote Users OU.
The GPO I selected is - "Prevent users from adding files to the root of their users files folder"
This doesn't seem to work. I have waited more than a few hours to allow the 90 minutes update, plus used the gpupdate /force
but when a user clicks on the RemoteApp (Excel in this example) then access to the C: drive (which is the root folder of the user's profile) is enabled, and the user can create folders and save files under C:.
I tried to run gpresult for the specific user but the GPO I created wasn't mentioned.
I thought this would be a straight forward mechanism, but somehow it looks like something is missing.
I have read about loopback and expanding, but not sure if this is what needs to be done, and if yes - I'd appreciate if I can get step by step instructions. Everything I found so far was VERY vague.
Thanks !
One more detail that may be relevant - the DC is a Windows Server 2012, and the session host is a Windows 2012 R2.

> These groups are not included in any other group, but they are located
> under an OU -called Remote Users.
>
> In the domain controller I have created a GPO named "Restrict access to
> root drive" which is linked to the Remote Users OU.
>
The USER accounts need to be in the OU your GPO is linked to. Despite
their name, GPOs do NOT apply to groups, but to users (and computers).
Groups only provide an additional layer of filtering...
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Preventing users from restoring to factory defaults

Just wondering if it is possible. Right now any standard user with a legitimate password is capable of pressing F8 when loading windows, enter repair and restore computer to factory defaults. Is there any way to prevent ordinary users from doing so?
This question was solved.
View Solution.

@arachnologist,
There isn't really an official way to prevent a full system recovery from being performed. By resetting the system to factory default, I take it you are referring to the F11 system recovery provided by HP which would return it to an out of the box condition.
Since this process takes place outside of Windows, setting permissions or making changes inside windows itself will not prevent this. However, you could make sure you have working recovery disks for the unit and then delete the recovery partition. Removing the recovery partition would eliminate the easy method of restoring the unit to factory defaults since the recovery partition (where the factory reset retrieves the files from) will be missing. However, this is how a user can reinstall Windows should something go wrong and this is why I recommend having the recovery disks on hand in a safe location.
Alternatively, you could also set a power on password for the unit. A power on password is set in the BIOS under security. With a power on password, only someone who knows this password could even get past the BIOS screen in order to reset the system or to boot any device (CD, USB, HDD, etc.). Be sure to remember this password as you would any other password. Keep in mind that this is not without its risks. For example, a forgotten power on password can be difficult to overcome. Due to the secure nature and depending on the unit (desktop, notebook, commercial unit), there may not be an easy or cheap way to get past a forgotten power-on password.
The solution with the least risk, in my opinion, would be to delete the recovery partition. This document details how to do this.
↙-----------How do I give Kudos?| How do I mark a post as Solved? ----------------↓

How to prevent users from saving and emailing intranet documents externally

Someone in our company needs to upload a pdf to our sharepoint intranet site for internal-only use. How can I prevent users from downloading it and emailing it externally?
I mean, a user could screenshot it I guess, but I need to give management a due diligence answer.

You would need to look into a reverse proxy/firewall that had the ability to block access based on content. This isn't something you can accomplish out of the box with SharePoint (even with AD RMS).
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

To prevent user from droping his own object .

Dear User
I have a database user like "aaa" in oracle 7.3.4.0.1 database.i do not want user "aaa" to drop his own schema objects like table and any other objects that he is owner.Do i have any system privilege to stop this user from doing so.User should be able to create objects and modify object but not to drop his own objects.For this purpose i have created a database trigger at database level to stop user "aaa" for doing above action.this trigger is giving me error on creation in oracle 7.3.4.0.1 .But when i tried same trigger in oracle 8i and 9i it work well.In oracle 8i and 9i it is preventing user from droping his own objects but i get other errors also along with raised error in trigger which i want to stop .The error which i am raising in trigger is
ORA-20001 INVALID COMMAND BUT OTHER TWO ERRORS THAT R RAISED AUTOMATICALLY ARE
ORA-00604 ERROR OCCURED AT RECURSIVE SQL LEVEL 1
AND
ORA-06512 AT LINE 8
I WANT TO STOP THESE TWO ERRORS .
PLZ HELP ME IN THIS REGARD AS SOON AS POSSBILE .
plz tell me is there any system privilege to stop user from droping his own object or any other way along with trigger at database level.
Thank u.

Hi
DBAs can use PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE (in system schema) to disable certain SQL and SQL*Plus commands in the SQL*Plus environment on a per-user basis. SQL*Plus, not Oracle, enforces this security. DBAs can even restrict access to the GRANT, REVOKE, and SET ROLE commands in order to control users' ability to change their database privileges.
The PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE table enables you to list roles which you do not want users to activate with an application. You can also explicitly disable use of various commands, such as SET ROLE. For example, you could create an entry in the PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE table to:
read more about this at
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a90842/ch10.htm#1005648

CE10 how to prevent user from view hostrical instance

hi,
We are currently using CE10. One of our user used search functionality in enterprise to search for reports start with 'employee' and it came back with all the crystal reports on the server that started with employees, even the one the user doesn't have access to. My greatest concern about this is that users can view historical instance and it is sensitive data. Does anybody know whether or not this is a bug in CE10? Is there a patch/fix for this? Is there any configuration change that I can make to
prevent users from being able search all the reports on the server rather just their own reports? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Susan

hi,
I have an EVERYONE group with limited access(view object), and EVERYONE group is added to each folder with NO ACCESS. If I revoke view object(explicitly denied) privilege from EVERYONE group, do I still need to remove EVERYONE group from each folder? When I'm at folder level in CMC, I see EVERYONE GROUP added, but when I tried to remove the EVERYONE GROUP, the EVERYONE group is not an option for removal. What am I missing?
Thanks for your help!
Regards,
Susan Johnson

Prevent user from deleting rows from all tables in his own schema

Hi,
How can I prevent user from deleting rows in all tables in his own schema.
I want the user to not able to delete rows from any existing or new tables that might be added in the future.
The user does not have the "DELETE ANY TABLE" system privilege.
Please advise.
Thanks.

Nowadays, I'd also avoid triggers (if possible).
Sometimes, when I daydream, I'm rewriting a few applications that I've contributed to as a newbie, and I'm very ashamed of it nowadays.
From what I've experienced, in retrospective, the emphasis on teaching 'Oracle stuff' has been lying far too much on PL/SQL row-by-row oriented processing instead of letting Oracle 'crunch' sets at once.
Most of my debugging hours ended up in discovering one or more database triggers 'doing stuff automagically'.
Another nice blogpost: http://rwijk.blogspot.com/2007/09/database-triggers-are-evil.html
Regarding OP's question:
I would just rethink/reconsider this requirement completely.
Correctly implementing privileges and roles seems the best way to go, yes.
Triggers? Nah...
pre-post-edit, noticed thread got updated just before posting
Don't know what you mean with 'namedropping', but I think it's legitimate to point other readers to interesting Oracle related opinions/articles that do have a technical background and lots of interesting examples.
post dreaded OTN outage edit (from here)
Again: I would just rethink/reconsider this requirement completely.
Both trigger/vpd are being used to hide a design flaw here.

Prevent user from doing device transfer using desktop manager

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for