My broadband package has been downgraded without m...

I wrote on here a couple of days ago as I was really annoyed at BT for cancelling my order for the Home Hub 4 which they ordered on my behalf - the order has disappeared off the MY BT page and I've no idea what happened, can only speculate. However, I've now logged back into My BT and found my broadband package has been downgraded from Unlimited Broadband to More Broadband!!! As far as I can tell, this means I've now got a limit of 40GB per month - I use that in a week!!
What the hell are BT playing at? Has anyone got these problems or have I been landed with the idiots??
Seriously considering cancelling the contract even though we are only weeks into it.
Sort it out BT

Hi
I am sorry to see you are having problems
I suggest you contact live chat at this link they should be able to help you
http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact/c/2902/?s_intcid=con_intban_sanda_contact_us_chat_from_forums
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Similar Messages

SQL Plus session - "schema.package" has been invalidated on making any chng

Hi
I am in the process of testing a stored procedure. Whenever I make changes to the procedure I am executing it from the SQL Plus session. But whenever I make a change to the procedure - i have to close that particular SQL Plus session and open another one. I get the message:
ORA-06510: PL/SQL: unhandled user-defined exception
ORA-04061: existing state of has been invalidated
ORA-04061: existing state of package body
"schema.package" has been invalidated
ORA-04065: not executed, altered or dropped package body
Is there a way that I do not have to open a new SQL Plus session everytime I make change to the package?

It does not help :(. I get this problem in a SQL+ session only when I make a change in a JDev session. I have to log off the SQL+ session and log back in and it is OK again without re-compling anything. I don't have a problem with two SQL+ session. Isn't that strange?
ben

Existing state of package has been discarded...

If application is running and it uses cursors/prepared statements for procedures and functions in packages and
new version of package is inserted into database, then an error message 'existing state of package has
been discarded' is raised.
However, there are packages where there is no 'existing state of package'. And for application purposes
new version of this package should be used without this error message.
Enhancement: There should be a pragma stating that package is 'stateless' and new version ot it is used if it
exists without an error situation.
This feature would be beneficial e.g. in 3-tier architecture where servers are running constantly.
Or can this be accomplished with any other way (without parsing statement with every call ) ?

When session references a package for the first time package is instantiated in session memory. If package is recompiled since, Oracle assumes it possibly changed and package instance in session memory is no longer valid. That's why any reference to that package made by such session will raise an error.
Session 1:
SQL> create or replace
2 package pkg1
3 is
4 g_n number;
5 procedure p1;
6 end;
7 /
Package created.
SQL> create or replace
2 package body pkg1
3 is
4 procedure p1
5 is
6 begin
7 for rc in (select * from emp) loop
8 dbms_output.put_line(rc.empno);
9 end loop;
10 end;
11 end;
12 /
Package body created.
SQL> exec pkg1.p1;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>This instantiated package PKG1 is session1. Then session 2:
SQL> alter package pkg1 compile body;
Package body altered.
SQL> Back to session 1:
SQL> exec pkg1.p1;
BEGIN pkg1.p1; END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-04068: existing state of packages has been discarded
ORA-04061: existing state of package body "SCOTT.PKG1" has been invalidated
ORA-04065: not executed, altered or dropped package body "SCOTT.PKG1"
ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called: "SCOTT.PKG1"
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL>SY.

Existing state of packages has been discarded...

Hi all,
I know this is a long shot and probably you need more details to help, but please take a look in case you've encountered something similar before... It is a pretty interesting problem.
Ok, I have two packages, say, A and B. Package A is composed of utility functions, and package B makes use of those functions. These packages are compiled as part of the schema installation, where package A is always compiled first. I also have unit test scripts for each procedure in each package.
Now, after schema installation, when I run the unit test for some procedures in package B, I get the following error:
ORA-04068: existing state of packages has been discarded
ORA-04065: not executed, altered or dropped stored procedure "my_schema.pkg_A"
ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called
ORA-06512: at "my_schema.pkg_B", line 18
ORA-06512: at line 5
Some interesting notes:
- I can run the unit test of all pkg A procedures. I can also describe the package. Which seems to me that pkg A has been compiled successfully.
- If I log into a sqlplus session, run the unit test for a pkg B procedure, which then fails with the above message. Then I run a unit test of a pkg A proceudre, which succeeds. Then I run the same pkg B unit test, it will work then. And all the other pkg B procedures will work from this point on.
- But if I log out from sqlplus session, and log in again, and run the pkg B procedure unit test again, it will fail as before.
- Certain procedures in pkg B have no problem running. They also call pkg A procedures. However, the pkg A procedures are always invoked in the where or order by clauses in these cases. The pkg B procedures that call pkg A procedure in a standalone statement will always fail.
- The fact above made me suspect that function-based indexes (which were created using pkg A procedures) were used in cases where pkg B procedures work. And that in those cases pkg A hasn't really been invoked. However, when I monitor those indexes using v$object_usage, it shows they are not used. (I have a very small set of data.)
- After schema installation, if I compile pkg B again, the problem will disappear.
Does this ring a bell to anyone? Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Gloria Chung

Thanks for reading and responding.
I'm compiling both header and body for both packages.
I ran the following query after schema installation, which returned 0:
select count(*) from user_objects where status='INVALID';
The schema installation involved putting new copies of both package A and B.
If I only recompile the package body after installation, it will still 'cure' the problem. I.e. if I run any of the affected pkg B unit test, it will run successfully.
It is assumed there is no schema before 'schema installation'.
Thanks,
Gloria

How to check the last time a package has been compiled?

How to check the last time a package has been compiled from sqlplus?

LAST_DDL_TIME column in DBA_OBJECTS.

ORA-04068: existing state of packages has been discarded

I work on an order entry system that is up 24x7 running Oracle version 8.0.5. I want to compile a fix to a procedure contained in a package body. I only will be recompiling the package body. Since the package body has no dependent objects, I should not invalidate any stored procedures that call this procedure in my package. However, should I worry about causing an "ORA-04068: existing state of packages has been discarded" error? What causes this error and when does it occur?

Please ensure that DBMS_ROWID is created in SYS schema and not in any ordinary user's schema. If it exists in any user's schema drop it from there.
If the problem persists, drop the package from sys schema as well and run two script files in the following order:
1) ORACLE_HOME\rdbms\admin\dbmsutil.sql
2) ORACLE_HOME\rdbms\admin\prvtutil.plb

How can i see if my gift card has been redeemed without redeeming it to my account?

i have a old gift card that i want to give as a gift to someone else, i see the only way to see if it has been used is to "redeem" it by entering the code and redeeming it into your account, but since i want to give it to someone else i cant redeem it into my account, so how do i see if its been redeemed without actually redeeming it?

The Only way to do that is to try to Redeem it and if it has already been used it will tell you.
How to Redeem a Code > http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1574
Note:
iTunes Gift Cards are only Valid in Country of Issue

Vendor Payment has been done without doing MIRO Postings

Hi,
In the SAP system, Goods receipt has been done (MIGO) with respect to a Purchase order for the period of March 2009 fiscal year. Now FI user has made the direct payment to the vendor in April period of 2010 fiscal year for the qty. received without doing the Invoicing in the MIRO postings. Now there is a difference in the accounting entries as still the open invoice exists for the Purchase order even though the payment has been made in the SAP system. So, kindly suggest what can be done further to correct the accounting entries.
Thanks & Regards,
Pavan

Hi
Please let me know hich will be the correct solution for the issuein the below given points for the problem stated in the message:
1. Doing the cancellation of Goods receipt documents and then marking the deletion of PO's.
OR
2. Running MR11 - GR/IR Clearence for the PO's for which GR done and IR not done.
OR
3. Doing cancellation of Vendor Payment and then doing MIRO for the PO's for which GR was done earlier.
I think all above are OK, it depends which one is the most acceptable one for your customer, for example if goods has already been receipted physically, then option 1 is not applicable.
I would like to say 3. might be the best way.
Thanks and regards,
Polly
Edited by: Polly Gan on Apr 12, 2010 8:21 AM

My Broadband order has been cancelled 11 times so ...

I am at the end of my tether with BT.
Since the 11th of November I have been trying to migrate to BT Broadband -I am still trying.
I have been fobbed off with so many excuses now I don't know what to do next.
The lack of communication from a communications company is unbelievable.
A Line Manager told me two days ago that it was not an issue any more and that my connection would be activated on Monday the 15th.He promised to phone me back yesterday -luckily I did not hold my breath waiting for his call.
For over an hour this morning I have been trying to get answers as to why it seems his order (and order number 10 placed by Liam the night before) have been cancelled by BT but are still showing as being in progress on the website.
Yet another order has been placed-will it be honoured?

Hi coig,
Thanks for your post and welcome to the forum!
I'm sorry that you're having problems migrating your services over to us. I'm happy to give you a hand from here and check what's causing the problem.
Click on my username and under the "about me" section of my profile you'll see the link to get in touch with us.
All the best,
Robbie
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry that we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Broadband speed has been terrible with really bad ...

Hi, for the past few days i have been receiving a really bad broadband speed, its varies from 0.90Mbps to 5Mbps normally i would be getting around 3.50mbps to 5mbps but lately its been terrible constatly changing. I tested my speed on speedtest.net and was getting a ping of around 100 + and sometimes it will go down to 50 ish. I have contacted BT the other day and they said they would get back to me today but they have not. Also for the past few days my connection has been dropping but since contacting BT that has stopped but im still getting slow download speeds to the point i cant even watch a YouTube video on a low video quality.
What i want to know is why i am getting so slow download speeds and a very unstable connection?
Is there a problem in my area? I have no changed any settings messed around with any cables to make my connection drop.
Thanks for any help.

Can you also post the full results from http://speedtester.bt.com/
Have you tried connecting to the test socket at the rear of the master socket
Have you tried the quiet line test? - dial 17070 option 2 - should hear nothing - best done with a corded phone. if cordless phone you may hear a 'dull hum' which is normal
also you could try the hints given by poster RogerB in this link they may help http://community.bt.com/t5/BB-in-Home/Poor-Broadband-speed/m-p/14217#M8397
Then someone here may be able to help and offer more advice.
This is a customer to customer self help forum the only BT presence here are the forum moderators
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

HT1212 restoring an iphone tht has been disabled without itunes

How do i restore an iphone that has been disabled due to too many passcode attempts. Phone never synced to itunes. Already tried restoring but it said an unknown error occurred and stopped. What can i do to get it working again?

This relates to error 9006.
Errors related to third-party security software
Error 2, 4 (or -4), 6, 1000, and 9006
Follow the steps to troubleshoot security software. Often, uninstalling third-party security software will resolve these errors.
There may be third-party software that modifies your default packet size in Windows by inserting a TcpWindowSize entry into your registry. An incorrectly set default packet size can cause these errors. Contact the manufacturer of the software that installed the packet size modification for assistance or follow this article by Microsoft: How to reset Internet Protocol (TCP/IP).
Verify that access to ports 80 and 443 are allowed on your network.
Verify that communication to albert.apple.com or phobos.apple.com isn't blocked by a firewall or other Internet security setting.
Discard the .ipsw file, open iTunes and attempt to download the update again. See the steps under "Advanced steps > Rename, move, or delete the iOS software file (.ipsw)" below for file locations.
Restore your device while connected to a different network.
Restore using a different computer.

Question re printing from internet has been blocked without a solution. Is there any next step we can take to get this problem solved or at least to be told that Forefox cannot solve it?

The question about Firefox not printing directly from the Internet has been asked before-but no useful solutions have been offered. It came up in 2010 and was under discussion until Jan 30 when it was locked.. I would like to re open the issue to further discussion or be notified by Firefox that they cannot solve it.

call them, tell them you NEED a new battery installed, and they need to tell you when they can do it. That is their job to help you! Give pushback if necessary.

"record has been saved" without insert

I don't know what I'm missing...
Custom 6i Form with several tabs and generally one block/table each. All the blocks are Delete Allowed = No. I can edit records but not insert via the form. However, I do get "record has been saved" message. I can insert via Toad with same db user.
Thank you.
Doug

I query all (4) records....(etc.)Now why didn't you give that info at the beginning?
(Thanks Marilyn and DH for jumping in)
Then the form SHOULD be inserting the row.
Is System.Message_Level being set to a value other than zero?
Do you have an on-insert trigger on the block that prevents inserting?
Do you have an on-error trigger either at block or form-level that overrides any error messages?
Is the form querying rows based on some key values set in the background, and the inserted records are not being set to the same key values?

How to reinstall Mountain Lion after Mavericks OS has been installed without using the time machine?

Hi, I upgraded to Maverics a few weeks ago, and since than my computer has been very slow. It NEVER happened before. Now, I want to go back to Mountain Lion, but I didn't back up my computer with the time machine. I'd appreciate if anyone could tell me how to reinstall Mountain Lion again over Maverics? Thanks a lot for your help!

You will need either a bootable flash drive with Mountain Lion to install, if you have one, or reinstall Snow Leopard if your computer can boot Snow Leopard. Or you can use Internet Recovery to reinstall the original version of OS X that came with the computer. In any event you will have to repartition and reformat the drive.
Install Mavericks, Lion/Mountain Lion on a New HDD/SDD
Be sure you backup your files to an external drive or second internal drive because the following procedure will remove everything from the hard drive.
Boot to the Internet Recovery HD:
Restart the computer and after the chime press and hold down the COMMAND-OPTION- R keys until a globe appears on the screen. Wait patiently - 15-20 minutes - until the Recovery main menu appears.
Partition and Format the hard drive:
1. Select Disk Utility from the main menu and click on the Continue button.
2. After DU loads select your external hard drive (this is the entry with the mfgr.'s ID and size) from the left side list. Click on the Partition tab in the DU main window.
3. Under the Volume Scheme heading set the number of partitions from the drop down menu to one. Click on the Options button, set the partition scheme to GUID then click on the OK button. Set the format type to Mac OS Extended (Journaled.) Click on the Partition button and wait until the process has completed. Quit DU and return to the main menu.
Reinstall Lion/Mountain Lion. Mavericks: Select Reinstall Lion/Mountain Lion, Mavericks and click on the Install button. Be sure to select the correct drive to use if you have more than one.
Note: You will need an active Internet connection. I suggest using Ethernet if possible because it is three times faster than wireless.

Broadband speed has been slow for almost 2 weeks.

I have been getting slow to extremely slow connection speed for almost 2 weeks now.
IP Profile for your line is - 9446 Kbps
Download speedachieved during the test was - 3548 Kbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 4000-21000 Kbps.
Just made this test and this is the FASTEST i have ever tested on the connection. Usually its more like 1000-2000kbps
The upload sits around 40-70kbps most of the time which is also extremely slow.
I have tried using 4 different filters. 2 different routers and my computer is directly connected to the router. I had no problems before this and my speed has always been good or great (20000kbps)
I have used a lot of time on the phone with the call center and they keep coming up with useless explanations and excuses for why the connection is slow (I work with this every day myself so i know that they have no clue)
This is my last shot to get a solution to this problem. If not i guess i will have to change service provider since the connection i have now is so bad i cant do anything else than reading stuff on the internet and sometimes watch a youtube video. My internet connection is vital to me since i use it for work so this is very annoying.
So... Does anyone have any idea what i can do?
edit: Here is the information from my Home Hub 3:
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
0 day, 05:44:00
Downstream:
10,708 Kbps
Upstream:
104 Kbps
  ADSL settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type:
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up):
7.0 dB / 0.2 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
29.5 dB / 16.7 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
0.0 dBm / 12.8 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
715571 / 217331
CRC Events (Down/Up):
11417 / 0
The master socet i am using is the Openreach

Here is all the information i could find for you together with a full test. I have done a factory reset two times without any luck
Test1 comprises of two tests
1. Best Effort Test:  -provides background information.
Download Speed
3712 Kbps
0 Kbps
21000 Kbps
Max Achievable Speed
Download speedachieved during the test was - 3712 Kbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 4000-21000 Kbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :10707 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 104 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 9446 Kbps
2. Upstream Test:  -provides background information.
Upload Speed
66 Kbps
0 Kbps
104 Kbps
Max Achievable Speed
>Upload speed achieved during the test was - 66 Kbps
Additional Information:
Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 104 Kbps
Connection information
Connection time:
0 day, 07:19:37
Data transmitted/received (GB):
0.025 / 0.413
Broadband username:
[email protected]
Password:
Not configured
TCP/IP settings
Broadband network IP address:
109.145.31.7
Default gateway:
217.32.142.99
Primary DNS:
194.72.9.38
Secondary DNS:
62.6.40.162
ADSL Line Status
Connection information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
0 day, 07:20:32
Downstream:
10,708 Kbps
Upstream:
104 Kbps
  ADSL settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type:
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up):
7.0 dB / 0.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
29.5 dB / 16.7 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
0.0 dBm / 12.8 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
899778 / 312169
CRC Events (Down/Up):
11417 / 0

My broadband package has been downgraded without m...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for