Need a sql query to get multiple dates in rows

Hi All,
i need a query to get dates for last 7 days and each dates should be in one row...
but select sysdate from dual..gives one row...
Expexcted Output
Dates:
01-oct-2013
30-sep-2013
29-sep-2013
28-sep-2013
27-sep-2013
26-sep-2013

Hi,
Do you mean that you want all 7 dates together on 1 row?
Here's one way:
SELECT LISTAGG ( TO_CHAR ( SYSDATE + 1 - LEVEL
                          , 'DD-Mon-YYYY'
                ) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY LEVEL)    AS txt
FROM    dual
CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 7
This is an example of String Aggregation, that is, taking a column on multiple rows, and concatenating all the values (however many htere happen to be) into 1 big string column 1 row.
Like everything else, exactly how to do it depends on your Oracle version.
For more on String Aggregation, including differetn techniques for different versions, see http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/10g/StringAggregationTechniques.php
Message was edited by: FrankKulash
Sorry, I mis-read the question.

Similar Messages

  • Sql query to get Thursday (Date) for the year 2014

    Hello All,
    I want to get the date for all the Thursdays in the year 2014. How can I achieve this using SQL query? Can anybody give me a hand with this? Thanks.
    Amol

    Hi,
    Check if this can help you
    DECLARE @counter INT
    DECLARE @Date Date
    SELECT @counter = 0
    Select @Date = '20131226'
    WHILE @counter <= 52
    BEGIN
    select Thursday = convert(varchar(10),DATEADD(WEEK,1, @Date),120)
    SELECT @counter = @counter + 1
    Select @Date = DATEADD(WEEK,1, @Date)
    END
    Regards
    Prasad Tandel
    Please dont forget to mark as answer if this helps you :)

  • Sql query to get union of matching rows

    I want to write a sql query that shows union f all the [Type] for each [Key] if [Key] has atleast one [Type] in common and for non matched [Key]s it will return the row as it is.
    For example In the sql table below [Key] '1' and '2' has [Type] 'B' in common and [Key] '1' and '4' has [Type] 'A' in common. In this case [Key] '1', '2' and '4' are related so result will be union of [Type]s in [Key]s '1', '2' and '4' which are 'A', 'B', 'C'
    and 'E' for each [Key]. And [Key] '3' has no [Type] in common so it will return itself.
    Input:
    declare @categories table ([Key] int, [Type] Char(1))
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (1, 'A')
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (1, 'B')
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (2, 'B')
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (2, 'C')
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (3, 'D')
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (4, 'E')
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (4, 'A')
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (5, 'F')
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (5, 'G')
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (6, 'G')
    insert into @categories ([Key], [Type]) values (6, 'H')
    Desired output:
    Key Type
    1 A
    1 B
    1 C
    1 E
    2 A
    2 B
    2 C
    3 D
    4 A
    4 B
    4 E
    5 F
    5 G
    5 H
    6 F
    6 G
    6 H

      
    The data element names are wrong. KEY is a reserved word; “Categories" and "type" are called attribute properties in ISO-11179 rules. Matthias Kläy is right; this is a graph problem in disguise, but you can do it with set theory to get  what are called
    equivalence classes. 
    An edge in a graph has two nodes. Some authors allow a single node to count as a edge, but a better way is to put the same node on both ends of the edge. Here is the graph in a table with all the needed constraints. This is why you should post DDL and not be
    so rude.  
    DROP TABLE Graph;
    CREATE TABLE Graph
    (edge INTEGER NOT NULL,
     node_1 CHAR(1) NOT NULL,
     node_2 CHAR(1) NOT NULL,
     CHECK (node_1 <= node_2),
     PRIMARY KEY (node_1, node_2));
    Here is your data in the correct format. 
    INSERT INTO Graph 
    VALUES 
     (1, 'A', 'B'),
     (2, 'B', 'C'),
     (3, 'D', 'D'), -- orphan node
     (4, 'A', 'E'),
     (5, 'F', 'G'),
     (6, 'G', 'H');
    Now Google Warshall's Algorithm. It uses three nested loops and an adjacency array. This is very clean and fast in a procedural language. Not so much in SQL. Let us do this in steps:
    WITH X1 (edge, node1_1, node1_2, node2_1, node2_2 )
    AS
    (SELECT CASE WHEN G1.edge <> G2.edge 
           THEN G1.edge ELSE G2.edge END,
           G1.node_1, G1.node_2, 
           G2.node_1, G2.node_2       
      FROM Graph AS G1, Graph AS G2
     WHERE G1.node_1 IN (G2.node_1, G2.node_2) 
       AND G1.edge <> G2.edge),
    X2 (edge, node_1, node_2)
    AS
    (SELECT edge, 
    CASE WHEN node1_1 IN (node2_1, node2_2) THEN node1_2 ELSE node1_1 END,
    CASE WHEN node2_1 IN (node1_1, node1_2) THEN node2_2 ELSE node2_1 END
    FROM X1)
    SELECT DISTINCT edge,
           CASE WHEN node_1 < node_2 THEN node_1 ELSE node_2 END,
           CASE WHEN node_2 < node_1 THEN node_1 ELSE node_2 END
     FROM X2;
    The X1 subquery gets the paths of length two. The X2 subquery removes the middle node and creates a new sorted edge. Insert these new rows into Graphs, if they are not there. Repeat the process until no more rows are added. 
    DROP TABLE Graph;
    CREATE TABLE Graph
    (edge INTEGER NOT NULL,
     node_1 CHAR(1) NOT NULL,
     node_2 CHAR(1) NOT NULL,
     CHECK (node_1 <= node_2),
     PRIMARY KEY (node_1, node_2));
    INSERT INTO Graph 
    VALUES 
     (1, 'A', 'B'),
     (2, 'B', 'C'),
     (3, 'D', 'D'), -- orphan node
     (4, 'A', 'E'),
     (5, 'F', 'G'),
     (6, 'G', 'H');
    Here is the monster rolled up into a single statement. 
    INSERT INTO Graph
    SELECT DISTINCT edge,
           CASE WHEN node_1 < node_2 THEN node_1 ELSE node_2 END,
           CASE WHEN node_2 < node_1 THEN node_1 ELSE node_2 END
     FROM (SELECT edge, 
    CASE WHEN node1_1 IN (node2_1, node2_2) THEN node1_2 ELSE node1_1 END,
    CASE WHEN node2_1 IN (node1_1, node1_2) THEN node2_2 ELSE node2_1 END
    FROM 
    (SELECT CASE WHEN G1.edge < G2.edge 
           THEN G1.edge ELSE G2.edge END,
           G1.node_1, G1.node_2, 
           G2.node_1, G2.node_2       
      FROM Graph AS G1, Graph AS G2
     WHERE G1.node_1 IN (G2.node_1, G2.node_2) 
       AND G1.edge <> G2.edge) AS X1(edge,node1_1, node1_2, node2_1, node2_2) )
        AS X2(edge, node_1, node_2)
    EXCEPT 
     SELECT * FROM Graph;
     SELECT * FROM Graph ORDER BY edge, node_1, node_2;
    1 A B
    1 A C
    1 B E
    1 C E
    2 B C
    3 D D
    4 A E
    5 F G
    5 F H
    6 G H
    --CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
    in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

  • SQL Query from getting multiple itemName against one production No.

    Hello Everyone !!!!!!
    My Client required an interface which can combine the production cycle. In which single Interface shows all the Production cycle like Bills of material, Production Order, Issue from Production and received from Production.
    Similarly i have developed single interface for now i have 1 problem ,
    when i show all the the production order number in a matrix i got Prodcution order number, DocNo,and Status .
    as u know in one production order against multiple items, Similarly in multiple items there have been multiple ItemNames , I need multiple ItemName .
    For this i have developed a Query but unfortunately my query doesn't show all the ItemName.
    Select Distinct B.* from OWOR
    Inner Join WOR1 B ON OWOR.DocEntry = B.DocEntry
    Inner Join OITM C On OWOR.ItemCode = C.itemCode
    Where OWOR.ItemCode = '16.0LF2060WGD'
    And OWOR.Status = 'R'
    AND DocNum = 708680
    Here 16.0LF2060WGD= Production order Number
    R = Status of that production Order number which is in the Release Mode
    Please make sure that in one Production order against multiple itemcode nad multiple ItemName exist and Production order also Exist in the OITM table ........Please help me out
    Could anybody help me out to update my Query according to my Client request ...
    Please ..............
    Thanx
    Edited by: Rizzikhan on Oct 13, 2010 9:31 AM

    Hello Everyone !!!!!!
    My Client required an interface which can combine the production cycle. In which single Interface shows all the Production cycle like Bills of material, Production Order, Issue from Production and received from Production.
    Similarly i have developed single interface for now i have 1 problem ,
    when i show all the the production order number in a matrix i got Prodcution order number, DocNo,and Status .
    as u know in one production order against multiple items, Similarly in multiple items there have been multiple ItemNames , I need multiple ItemName .
    For this i have developed a Query but unfortunately my query doesn't show all the ItemName.
    Select Distinct B.* from OWOR
    Inner Join WOR1 B ON OWOR.DocEntry = B.DocEntry
    Inner Join OITM C On OWOR.ItemCode = C.itemCode
    Where OWOR.ItemCode = '16.0LF2060WGD'
    And OWOR.Status = 'R'
    AND DocNum = 708680
    Here 16.0LF2060WGD= Production order Number
    R = Status of that production Order number which is in the Release Mode
    Please make sure that in one Production order against multiple itemcode nad multiple ItemName exist and Production order also Exist in the OITM table ........Please help me out
    Could anybody help me out to update my Query according to my Client request ...
    Please ..............
    Thanx
    Edited by: Rizzikhan on Oct 13, 2010 9:31 AM

  • Need a sql query to get the difference between two timestamp in the format of hh:mm:ss.msec

    I have a database table where it keeps record of the transaction when it starts at StartTime and when it ends at EndTime. Both these entries are having the timestamp entries. Say for example, I have a tuple with Entries like 'Transaction A' starts at '2014-05-07
    20:55:03.170' and ends at '2014-05-08 08:56:03.170'. I need to find the difference between these two timestamps and my expected output is 12:01:00.000. Let me know how to achieve this ? 

    Hi,
    You can use below script which calculates difference as DD:HH:MM:SS. You can modify the same:
    DECLARE @startTime DATETIME
    DECLARE @endTime DATETIME
    SET @startTime = '2013-11-05 12:20:35'
    SET @endTime = '2013-11-10 01:22:30'
    SELECT [DD:HH:MM:SS] =
    CAST((DATEDIFF(HOUR, @startTime, @endTime) / 24) AS VARCHAR)
    + ':' +
    CAST((DATEDIFF(HOUR, @startTime, @endTime) % 24) AS VARCHAR)
    + ':' +
    CASE WHEN DATEPART(SECOND, @endTime) >= DATEPART(SECOND, @startTime)
    THEN CAST((DATEDIFF(MINUTE, @startTime, @endTime) % 60) AS VARCHAR)
    ELSE
    CAST((DATEDIFF(MINUTE, DATEADD(MINUTE, -1, @endTime), @endTime) % 60)
    AS VARCHAR)
    END
    + ':' + CAST((DATEDIFF(SECOND, @startTime, @endTime) % 60) AS VARCHAR),
    [StringFormat] =
    CAST((DATEDIFF(HOUR , @startTime, @endTime) / 24) AS VARCHAR) +
    ' Days ' +
    CAST((DATEDIFF(HOUR , @startTime, @endTime) % 24) AS VARCHAR) +
    ' Hours ' +
    CASE WHEN DATEPART(SECOND, @endTime) >= DATEPART(SECOND, @startTime)
    THEN CAST((DATEDIFF(MINUTE, @startTime, @endTime) % 60) AS VARCHAR)
    ELSE
    CAST((DATEDIFF(MINUTE, DATEADD(MINUTE, -1, @endTime), @endTime) % 60)
    AS VARCHAR)
    END +
    ' Minutes ' +
    CAST((DATEDIFF(SECOND, @startTime, @endTime) % 60) AS VARCHAR) +
    ' Seconds '
    Reference:
    http://sqlandme.com/2013/12/23/sql-server-calculating-elapsed-time-from-datetime/
    - Vishal
    SqlAndMe.com

  • SQL query to get transaction detail from DEFERRED_TRAN_ID

    Hi,
    I'm using Oracle Advance Replication and get the transaction detail from Enterprise Manager Console.
    So instead of using the console.
    Is there a way any SQL query which get transaction details like SQL query fired, old and new column value etc from DEFERRED_TRAN_ID.
    thanks

    quote:
    Originally posted by:
    lucapac
    I have two tables: tblWorkers and tblSkills. tblWorkers has a
    column, Skills, which is populated from a multiple-checkbox form
    field with one or more skill_IDs from tblSkills, so each
    tblWorkers.Skills consists of a list of one or more comma-delimited
    values. For any Skill_ID, I need to generate a listing of all
    Workers with the corresponding skill, so I have tried to do
    something along the lines of SELECT WorkerName FROM tblWorkers
    WHERE Skills IN (Skills, #FORM.Skill_ID#) ... or WHERE Skills IN
    (ListFind(Skills, #FORM.Skill_ID#)) ... etc. ??? My results (once I
    got data type mismatches out of the way) return all Workers, not
    just those with the desired Skill. There must be an easy way to do
    this ... How do people with a bit more CF/SQL experience than I
    have do this???
    As Kronin implied, we normalize our databases. If you don't
    understand that answer, the book "Database Design for Mere Mortals"
    is often mentioned on this forum.

  • Query to get the data of all the columns in a table except any one column

    Can anyone please tell how to write a query to get the data of all the columns in a table except one particular column..
    For Example:
    Let us consider the EMP table.,
    From this table except the column comm all the remaining columns of the table should be listed
    For this we can write a query like this..
    Select empno, ename, job, mgr, sal, hiredate, deptno from emp;
    Just to avoid only one column, I mentioned all the remaining ( 7 ) columns of the table in the query..
    As the EMP table consists only 8 columns, it doesn't seem much difficult to mention all the columns in the query,
    but if a table have 100 columns in the table, then do we have to mention all the columns in the query..?
    Is there any other way of writing the query to get the required result..?
    Thanks..

    Your best best it to just list all the columns. Any other method will just cause more headaches and complicated code.
    If you really need to list all the columns for a table because you don't want to type them, just use something like...
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  select trim(',' from sys_connect_by_path(column_name,',')) as columns
      2  from (select column_name, row_number() over (order by column_id) as column_id
      3        from user_tab_cols
      4        where column_name not in ('COMM')
      5        and   table_name = 'EMP'
      6       )
      7  where connect_by_isleaf = 1
      8  connect by column_id = prior column_id + 1
      9* start with column_id = 1
    SQL> /
    COLUMNS
    EMPNO,ENAME,JOB,MGR,HIREDATE,SAL,DEPTNO
    SQL>

  • Query for Getting previous date in oracle in specifc scenario

    I have the below data in a table A which i need to insert into table B along with one compute column.
    TABLE A:
    Account_No | Balance | As_on_date
    1001 |-100 | 1-Jan-2013
    1001 |-150 | 2-Jan-2013
    1001 | 200 | 3-Jan-2013
    1001 |-250 | 4-Jan-2013
    1001 |-300 | 5-Jan-2013
    1001 |-310 | 6-Jan-2013
    Table B:
    In table B,there should be no of days to be shown when balance is negative and the date one which it has gone into negative.
    So,for 6-Jan-2013,this table should show below data:
    Account_No | Balance | As_on_date | Days_passed | Start_date
    1001 | -310 | 6-Jan-2013 | 3 | 4-Jan-2013
    Here,no of days should be the days when the balance has gone negative in recent time and not from the old entry.
    I need to write a sql query to get the no of days passed and the start date from when the balance has gone negative.
    I tried to formulate a query using Lag analytical function,but i am not getting how should i check the first instance of negative balance by traversing back using LAG function. Even the first_value function was given a try but not getting how to partition in it based on negative value.
    Any help or direction on this will be really helpful.
    Thanks

    I think you can apply the Tabibitoshan method here. The query is more complex but performs better than other methods. For an explanation, see Tabibitosan method tutorial by Aketi Jyuuzou
    The idea behind the method is to identify "continuous" records without gaps. Here I identify records that are "continuous" because they contain an uninterrupted series of negative balances.
    drop table t;
    CREATE TABLE t (Account_No , Balance , As_on_date) AS SELECT
    1001 ,-100 , to_date('1-Jan-13', 'DD-MON-YY') FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT
    1001 ,-150 , to_date('2-Jan-13', 'DD-MON-YY') FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT
    1001 , 200 , to_date('3-Jan-13', 'DD-MON-YY') FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT
    1001 ,-250 , to_date('4-Jan-13', 'DD-MON-YY') FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT
    1001 ,-300 , to_date('5-Jan-13', 'DD-MON-YY') FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT
    1001 ,-310 , to_date('6-Jan-13', 'DD-MON-YY') FROM dual;
    SELECT Account_No, Balance, to_char(As_on_date, 'DD-MON-YYYY') as_on_date,
    CASE
      WHEN balance < 0
      THEN row_number() OVER(PARTITION BY account_no, grp ORDER BY as_on_date)
    END days_passed,
    CASE
      WHEN balance < 0
      THEN to_char(
        first_value(as_on_date) OVER(PARTITION BY account_no, grp ORDER BY as_on_date),
        'DD-MON-YYYY'
    end start_date
    from (
      SELECT Account_No, Balance, As_on_date,
      CASE WHEN balance >= 0 THEN NULL ELSE
        row_number() OVER(PARTITION BY account_no ORDER BY as_on_date) -
        sum(CASE WHEN balance < 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) OVER(PARTITION BY account_no ORDER BY as_on_date)
      end grp
      FROM t
    order by account_no, As_on_date;
    ACCOUNT_NO
    BALANCE
    AS_ON_DATE
    DAYS_PASSED
    START_DATE
    1001
    -100
    01-JAN-2013
    1
    01-JAN-2013
    1001
    -150
    02-JAN-2013
    2
    01-JAN-2013
    1001
    200
    03-JAN-2013
    1001
    -250
    04-JAN-2013
    1
    04-JAN-2013
    1001
    -300
    05-JAN-2013
    2
    04-JAN-2013
    1001
    -310
    06-JAN-2013
    3
    04-JAN-2013

  • SQL query to get a list of relations between workitems

    How can I create a SQL query to get a list of all problems with related changes?  And all problems with related incidents?
    I have tried to join the tables RelationshipTypeDim with ProblemDimKey and ChangeRequestDim, but the results are not correct.

    The relationships in the data warehouse can be kind of tricky. The relationships are contained in the WorkItemRelatesToWorkItemFactvw table. This table lists the related items by their WorkItemDimKey, so you cannot reference directly from the ChangeRequestDimvw
    or ProblemDimvw. You will need to reference the WorkItemDimvw to get the WorkItemDimKey for each entry.
    The query below will get all of the related work items from the Change Request class. The way the joins work is ChangeRequestDimvw gets the list of change requests. Then inner joins WorkItemDimvw to get the WorkItemDimKey for each CR. Then inner joins WorkItemRelatesToWorkItemFactvw
    to get all of the CRs with related work items. Then inner joins the WorkItemDimvw again to get the ID of the related work item. 
    Now the tricky part is it appears that these relationship are set based on which item  that created the relationship. So you need to union a second query that reverse the relationship on the WorkItemRelatesToWorkItemFactvw. 
    This query should give you a good start on getting the related work items. You can filter it down from here if you only want to include problems.
    SELECT C.ID, WIWI.ID
    FROM dbo.ChangeRequestDimvw C
    INNER JOIN dbo.WorkItemDimvw WI ON
    WI.EntityDimKey = C.EntityDimKey
    INNER JOIN dbo.WorkItemRelatesToWorkItemFactvw AS WIRWI ON
    WIRWI.WorkItemDimKey = WI.WorkItemDimKey
    INNER JOIN dbo.WorkItemDimvw AS WIWI ON
    WIWI.WorkItemDimKey = WIRWI.WorkItemRelatesToWorkItem_WorkItemDimKey
    union
    SELECT C.ID, WIWI.ID
    FROM dbo.ChangeRequestDimvw C
    INNER JOIN dbo.WorkItemDimvw WI ON
    WI.EntityDimKey = C.EntityDimKey
    INNER JOIN dbo.WorkItemRelatesToWorkItemFactvw AS WIRWI ON
    WIRWI.WorkItemRelatesToWorkItem_WorkItemDimKey = WI.WorkItemDimKey
    INNER JOIN dbo.WorkItemDimvw AS WIWI ON
    WIWI.WorkItemDimKey = WIRWI.WorkItemDimKey
    Order by C.ID
    Matthew Dowst |
    Blog | Twitter

  • Sql query to get distinct count

    Hi
    I use SQL Server Management Studio
    can I have a sql query to get count as shown below against  each month column and name column to get distinct count.
    for example if there is two rows with the same date period and same name then the count should be one in first row and zero in the next row of the same data.
    Table Name: Table1
    Column: Month, Name
    Month
    Name
    Count
    12/1/2012 0:00
    AK
    1
    12/1/2012 0:00
    AK
    0
    12/1/2012 0:00
    AB
    1
    1/1/2013 0:00
    AK
    1
    1/1/2013 0:00
    AK
    0
    1/1/2013 0:00
    AB
    1
    3/1/2013 0:00
    AA
    1
    3/1/2013 0:00
    AK
    1
    3/1/2013 0:00
    AK
    0
    6/1/2013 0:00
    AA
    1
    6/1/2013 0:00
    AK
    1
    6/1/2013 0:00
    AK
    0
    9/1/2013 0:00
    AA
    1
    9/1/2013 0:00
    AK
    1
    9/13/2013 0:00
    AK
    1
    10/1/2013 0:00
    AA
    1
    10/1/2013 0:00
    AK
    1
    10/1/2013 0:00
    AK
    0

    Hi,
    Thanks for the query but this query gives the total count like shown below
    if see the second row in the below table AK for 2012-12-1 gives total count as 2 but need the query to show the first row as 1 and there after 0
    query result
    Month name cnt
    2012-12-01 00:00:00.000 AB 1
    2012-12-01 00:00:00.000 AK 2
    2012-12-01 00:00:00.000 AK 2
    2013-01-01 00:00:00.000 AB 1
    2013-01-01 00:00:00.000 AK 2
    2013-01-01 00:00:00.000 AK 2
    2013-03-01 00:00:00.000 AA 1
    2013-03-01 00:00:00.000 AK 2
    2013-03-01 00:00:00.000 AK 2
    2013-06-01 00:00:00.000 AA 1
    2013-06-01 00:00:00.000 AK 2
    2013-06-01 00:00:00.000 AK 2
    2013-09-01 00:00:00.000 AA 1
    2013-09-01 00:00:00.000 AK 1
    2013-09-13 00:00:00.000 AK 1
    2013-10-01 00:00:00.000 AA 1
    2013-10-01 00:00:00.000 AK 2
    2013-10-01 00:00:00.000 AK 2

  • SQL query to get last 6 months records neglect the current month

    Hi All;
    I need help with 
    sql query to get last 6 months records neglect the current month
    Any help much appreciated
    Thanks
    Pradnya07

    SELECT <> FROM tbl WHERE dt >=dateadd(month,-6,GETDATE())
    Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
    http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
    MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
    MS SQL Consulting:
    Large scale of database and data cleansing
    Remote DBA Services:
    Improves MS SQL Database Performance
    SQL Server Integration Services:
    Business Intelligence

  • SQL query to get the Datetime 06 hours prior to the table Datetime value

    Hi Experts,
                    I'm just trying to create a SQL query to get the Datetime which should be 06 hours prior to my Table column value(Executiontime),
    Eg: my Executiontime(column) value is 07:00AM means, this query should fetch the detail of first VMName from table at 01:00AM, 
    SQL Table Name: TestTable
    Columns: VMName(varchar),status(varchar) Executiontime(Datetime)
    SQL Query : Select Top 1 VMName from
    TestTable where convert(date,Exeutiontime)=convert(date,getdate()) and
    status='0' and ExecutionTime > dateadd(hour,6,getdate())
    Request someone to alter this Query to my requirement or give me the new one.
    Regards,
    Sundar
    Sundar

    Hi All,
            Thanks for your Prompt response. I tried the below queries, but still I don't have any luck. Actually the queries are returning the value before the condition met (say when the time difference is more than 06 hours). I want the
    query to return exactly @ 06 hour difference or less than 06 hours,
    Query 01: Select Top 1 VMName from TestTable where
    convert(date,Exeutiontime)=convert(date,getdate())
    and status='0'
    and ExecutionTime >
    dateadd(hour,-6,getdate())
    Query 02: Select
    Top 1 VMName from TestTable where
    status='0'
    and ExecutionTime >
    dateadd(hour,-6,getdate())
    Query 03: Select
    Top 1 VMName from TestTable where status='0'
    and ExecutionTime >
    dateadd(hour,-6,ExecutionTime)
              Can someone point out the mistake please.
    Regards,
    Sundar
    Sundar

  • SQL query to get the list of approvals

    Hi,
    Could someone let me know the SQL query to get the list of all the pending approvals for a user in OIM 11g R2.
    Thanks

    There are a few ways to do this:
    -  The easiest would be to use a Relationship Query from the CMC. To do this, go to the Universes section on the CMC, right click on the relevant universe, select tools >> Check Relationships.
    - Use Query Builder. You will need more than one query to pull the information you need. You could try something like the below (for Webi)
    SELECT SI_NAME, SI_WEBI, SI_DATACONNECTION FROM CI_APPOBJECTS
    WHERE SI_KIND = 'universe' and SI_NAME = 'Universe Name'
    This will give you a list of Webi Reports by SI_ID.
    You'll need another query to list Webi report names:
    SELECT SI_NAME FROM CI_INFOOBJECTS WHERE SI_ID IN (SI_ID from query above)
    - This is trivial via Auditing / the Activity universe. This of course will only return reports that have already run.
    Best.
    Srinivas

  • SQL query to get last 10 records in the table?

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me the SQL query to get last 10 records in the table?
    Thanks!!
    MCP

    Please, define what "last" means. Sets are unordered by definition, so if you want to retrieve rows from a table in a specific order you need to specify what that order is - e.g. by maintaining a value in a column (or a combination of columns) that you can use in the ORDER BY clause of the SELECT statement.
    If, for instance, you kept the time when the row was inserted in a special column (InsertedTime), you could use this in your query like this:
    select top (10)
      <column list>
      from <table or view>
      where <restriction(s)>
      order by InsertedTime desc;
    ML
    Matija Lah, SQL Server MVP
    http://milambda.blogspot.com

  • Adhoc Query Requirement with Multiple Data Source

    Hi All,
    I have a Adhoc Query Requirement with Multiple Data Source. Is there any way to achive it. Other than Resultant set and bring into Model.
    Thanks
    SS

    You can compare stuff in the EL, but I don't think this is what you need.
    You can just use Java code in the backing bean class for all the business logic. You can use DAO classes for database access logic. Finally for displaying you can use the JSF tags such as h:outputText.

Maybe you are looking for