Need Customizing request instead of Workbench for Table Mainetnance

Hello All,
I created a ztable with Table Maintenance.
Whenever I am creating entries using SM30 it is asking workbench request instead of customizing request.
I need customizing request to be created for table entries.
Can anybody help me in this regard.

Hi Eric,
Thanks a lot!.
The problem is solved....
Thank you very much for your help.
Regards,
Sunil

Similar Messages

How to merge several customizing requests into a workbench request?

Dear experts:
could you tell me How to merge several customizing requests into a workbench request in t-code:SE03?
thanks
Edited by: feng Qiu on Nov 4, 2008 3:24 AM

Hi,
Refer this:
Re: Customizing Request's contents - Transfer them to a new request
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/EN/d4/34196a249711d3b29e0000e817ab98/content.htm
I believe you need to do this from SE09/SE10.

Need custom column widths in Append Text Table to Report

I need to print reports with tables of different column widths specified for each column, as the contained fields vary in width from just 3 characters in one column to 40 characters in another. Also we are trying to match the reports generated by a non-labview routine. In the past I have been able to achieve this by editing the Append Table to Report vi, working my way through the inner hierarchy to replace the DBL numeric COLUMN WIDTH control with a DBL numeric array. The innermost vi, Set Table Column Width, assigns the numeric to a property node in a for loop, so the change is simple: replace the scalor with an array and enable indexing on the for loop. Of course, after each Labview upgrade, I've had to go back in and repeat these edits on the overwritten upgraded vi's. This time there is a problem. The new version of this toolkit is object oriented, and disturbing these vi's wrecks the class methods in a way I don't understand (mostly because I've had no dealings with object oriented programming) and which cannot be undone. I recently tried this and after not being able to fix the problem even with phone support, I had to spend the next two days unistalling and reinstalling Labview! I desperately need a way to achieve this functionality without killing the toolkit, which is used (in its original functionality) by another absolutely critical program. PLEASE HELP!
The hierarchy is as follows:
NI report.lvclass:Append Table to Report (wrap)
NI report.lvclass:Append Table to Report
NI Standard report.lvclass:Append Text Table to Report
NI Standard report.lvclass:tables
NI Report Generation Core.lvlibet Table Column Width

There is a highly relevant thread under discussion here:
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=features&thread.id=429
You may wish to read it and chime in as it is a discussion of LabVIEW's policy (and possible change in policy for the future) concerning the handling of non-palette VIs between LV versions.
Rob Hingle wrote:
> Is that to say NI will not be helping me with this? Pretty disappointing lack of support, seems
> like a terrible idea to go to object oriented if even your own application engineers can't figure
> out such a simple fix. Gotta give NI a huge thumbs down on this one, thanks for nothing.
I doubt that it is a simple fix -- our AEs are generally top notch at figuring out solutions for customers -- if it were simple, my bet is they'd have solved it. Asking an AE to work around a bug is different from asking them to rearchitect the toolkit. You are asking them to add a feature that the new version of the toolkit is not
designed to support. The difficulty in doing this is completely independent of the decision to use LabVIEW classes to implement the toolkit. If any piece of software is not designed with a particular use case in mind, what may be a simple tweak under one design may become a very hard problem under another design.
In your case, the solution is very straightforward: Use the older version of the toolkit. Any time you create a custom modification of the VIs that ship with LV or one of its toolkits, you should make your own copy and have your VIs link against the copy. LabVIEW promises to maintain all the public functionality version over version. Usually we succeed at that. What we do not promise is to maintain our private implementation of that functionality. It is impossible for LabVIEW (or any other software library) to maintain all of its private internal operations while still continuing any development. Using a copy of the original VIs shields you from having to recode your changes every version (something you've already mentioned is a chore) and it guarantees that functionality that you relie upon does not disappear.
I hope you are willing to be understanding of this situation and not hold it against the AEs working on this. They try hard to provide excellent customer service, and spend lots of time inventing custom solutions for our users. This happens to be a situation where the correct fix is not to modify the new toolkit version to do something it wasn't designed to do but to modify your development process so that the problem is solved now and into the future.

Need help with date range searches for Table Sources in SES

Hi all,
I need help, please. I am trying to satisfy a Level 1 client requirement for the ability to search for records in crawled table sources by a date and/or date range. I have performed the following steps, and did not get accurate results from Advanced searching for date. Please help me understand what I am doing wrong, and/or if there is a way to define a date search attribute without creating a LOV for a date column. (My tables have 500,00 rows.)
I am using SES 10.1.8.3 on Windows 32.
My Oracle 10g Spatial Table is called REPORTS and this table has the following columns:
TRACKNUM Varchar2
TITLE Varchar2
SUMMARY CLOB
SYMBOLCODE Varchar2
Timestamp Date
OBSDATE Date
GEOM SDO_GEOMETRY
I set up the REPORTS table source in SES, using TRACKNUM as the Primary Key (unique and not null), and SUMMARY as the CONTENT Column. In the Table Column Mappings I defined TITLE as String and TITLE.
Under Global Settings > Search Attributes I defined a new Search Attribute (type Date) called DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY).
Went back to REPORTS source previously defined and added a new Table Column Mapping - mapping OBSDATE to the newly defined DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) search attribute.
I then modified the Schedule for the REPORTS source Crawler Policy to “Process All Documents”.
Schedule crawls and indexes entire REPORTS table.
In SES Advanced Search page, I enter my search keyword, select Specific Source Group as REPORTS, select All Match, and used the pick list to select the DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) Attribute Name, operator of Greater than equal, and entered the Value 01-JAN-07. Then the second attribute name of DATE_OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY), less than equals, 10-JAN-07.
Search results gave me 38,000 documents, and the first 25 I looked at had dates NOT within the 01-JAN-07 / 10-JAN-07 range. (e.g. OBSDATE= 10-MAR-07, 22-SEP-07, 02-FEB-08, etc.)
And, none of the results I opened had ANY dates within the SUMMARY CLOB…in case that’s what was being found in the search.
Can someone help me figure out how to allow my client to search for specific dated records in a db table using a single column for the date? This is a major requirement and they are anxiously awaiting my solution.
Thanks very much, in advance….

raford,
Thanks very much for your reply. However, from what I've read in the SES Admin Document is that (I think) the date format DD/MM/YYYY pertains only to searches on "file system" sources (e.g. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF, etc.). We have 3 file system sources among our 25 total sources. The remaining 22 sources are all TABLE or DATABASE sources. The DBA here has done a great job getting the data standardized using the typical/default Oracle DATE type format in our TABLE sources (DD-MON-YY). Our tables have anywhere from 1500 rows to 2 million rows.
I tested your theory that the dates we are entering are being changed to Strings behind the scenes and on the Advanced Page, searched for results using OBSDATE equals 01/02/2007 in an attempt to find data that I know for certain to be in the mapped OBSDATE table column as 01-FEB-07. My result set contained data that had an OBSDATE of 03-MAR-07 and none containing 01-FEB-07.
Here is the big issue...in order for my client to fulfill his primary mission, one of the top 5 requirements is that he/she be able to find specific table rows that are contain a specific date or range of dates.
thanks very much!

How does a customer request new Driver support for BOE XI 3.1?

Hello:
I would like to know the process to request product enhancements/feature support?
We are running BOE XI 3.1 on HPUX-IA64 going to Neoview 2.4.
I would like to know how to request support for the HP Neoview JDBC driver.
What is the process?
Currently as of SP3 the platform support doc only has HP ODBC 2.4 listed.
Thanks,
Dwayneat

Hi,
Raise a ticket with SAP support.
-Gokul.

Need to delete flag "quantity incomplete" for table COSP (periodic repost)

Hello.
Step 1. I writed-off fuel to Internal order(unit of measure Liter ) ,
Step 2 Posted SKF,
Step 3 Execute Actual periodic reposting.
The issue is that receivers Internal orders has "empty" field quantity, it is because in table COSP field MUVO (quantity incomplete)= 'X'.
So I want to make it(MUVO) empty to see quantity in Receiver orders . How can I do this (BADI, user-exit), and what is the problem that I can face after that?
By the way, I'm not going to post fuel in Milliliters.

Hi,
For primary cost elements, the system keeps a control record in Table COKA for each object, cost element, fiscal year, and origin, which defines for all postings in a fiscal year whether and in which unit of measure quantities are transferred to the totals record. Basically, the posted quantity (COEP-MBGBTR) is updated in the posted unit of measure (COEP-MEINB) in the line item. Whether the quantity is transferred to the totals record depends on the control record valid for the object. If the quantity is transferred to the totals record, the total quantity field (COEP-MEGBTR) is also filled in the line item.
The control (COKA) record is created with the first posting in the fiscal year an cannot be changed during the year. In the cost element master record, you can store a default value for the unit of measure and set the "Manage quantity" indicator. If the indicator is set, the system sends a warning, if an actual posting is made without an entry for the unit of measure. If the unit of measure is changed subsequently in the cost element master, this does not affect quantity update, if there had already been postings in the fiscal year concerned.
If another posting is made to the same cost element at a later time, the system checks whether the posted quantity can be converted to the unit defined in the COKA record. If this is the case, the quantity is converted accordingly (e.g. kg to t) and transferred to the totals record. Otherwise, it is not transferred. To indicate that there had been such a posting (which is not contained in the total quantity) in period xxx, the "Quantity incomplete" indicator (COSP-MUVxxx) is set in the totals record.
Hope this information is helpful for you.
regards
Waman

Why JSC 2 now needs 1GIG Ram instead of 512MB for EA?

Hi all,
What's the difference between JSCreator 2 and Early Access edition that require not 1 GIG of ram?
I'm skeptic of installing JSC2 bcz of this.
thx.

ok, that's a Ooooohmm.. I didn't think my question would spark such a buzz..
javaswed,
I'm sorry if I offended you with my question.
what are you doing in the J2EE department if you dont have 1GB ram in the first place ?.
I'm just starting to learn Java and Creator 2.
if you dont have 1 GB ram your hardly a serious developer anyhow.
Well actually I'm not new to programming, I finished a computer class and mainly did HTML in Dreamweaver since 1999. And I don't consider myself a serious developer I guess here you're right. You will be amazed what my current PIII 450Mhz with 400MB ram can run on Linux. It load's JSC2EA on XP SP2 with another 35 processes running in 2:27 mins. I manily need for learning, tutorials etc. By the time I go for a production i'll buy myself a new pc.
the comp hardware costs really is about 0 compared to what a software developers sallary is..
I'm not a "Software developer" and you should remember that not everybody live in the USA. I'm 24 y/old and the truth is i'm in the bottom of the tire now and the days of working 1/2 hour a day and making $1.5k from advertising are gone.
Times change...
so if you cant affard a decent comp, something is major wrong.
Maybe. Time will tell. I could have bought myself a new pc, I just decided to invest the money in something more important.
You should also be aware of that the generall sweet spot for client performance has recently moved from 1 to 2gb of ram.
this is something you should understand...
I sold pc's on my last job, I do understand it :-)
And really, arguing about these tiny amounts of ram for a developer machine is silly.
Actually arguing about anything is silly. I didn't come to start an argue. :-)
I came to look for help.
I wish you all of the best. :-)
Everybody, thank you very much for your kind comments and warm welcome!
vspurlin,
Thank you for your comment you actually answered my question. I will be able to run The new release of JSC2 on my pc for a learning purpose and tutorials for the time being.
It may be a good idea to show on the minimum system requirements, The actual MINIMUM of ram required to run the program, lets say for learning and recommended minimum for production work. Otherwise in my opinion 1GIG requirement may deter a lot of people "planning to replace comp" of touching JSC2 in the first place.
Thanks again, :-)
Valentine.

Customizing tables not asking for Customizing Request while saving data

Hi,
I have some customizing tables in my development server (Delivery Class = 'C').
These always used to ask for a Customizing Request whenever data was saved in them.
Suddenly, I have noticed they are no more asking for any Customizing Request. I cross-checked in the Transport Organizer and confirmed that there are no customizing requests of mine which may be already holding any data entries of these tables.
I wonder why this may be happening (believe it to be some basis configuration issue. also asked my basis guy but he has no clue).
Kindly suggest.
Thanks,
Z

Thanks Navneet and Gautham.
My problem is now solved. Let me summarize the problem and the solution now.
-> The customization tables suddenly stopped asking for a request while saving data.
Somehow the settings had been reset, and as Gautham pointed out, it was corrected in the tcode SCC4
-> Most of the tables now worked fine, but still few of them didnt ask for requests
Here, I found out that the developers had chosen "no, or user, recording routine" instead of "standard recording routine". For such tables, when i check in the tcode SE54, menu path Environment -> Maintenance Objects -> Change, I find the Transport category 'No Transport'. Regenerating the maintenance generator choosing "standard recording routine" fixes this and the tables now ask for a customizing request.
Thanks, both, for the quick response.

Doubt in customizing request with respect to table entries

Hi All,
I have a doubt in customizing request with respect to table entries.
Suppose I have a customizing request with respect to a table that contains say 10 entries in the development system.
Now I am transporting this request to the quality system in which the same table contains 20 entries.
When I am transporting this table from the development system to the quality system, will my 10 entries in the development system get added to the 20 entries in the quality system or will my table get overwritten in the quality system.
What difference will this be if it is a workbench request ? .
Regards,
Sushanth H.S.

Hello,
So if we are transporting contents of a table from one system to another, it should always be a customizing request and not a workbench request right.
If the "Delivery Class" of the table is 'C'(Customizing table, maintenance only by cust., not SAP import) it will ask for a customizing request.
If it is 'A'(Application table (master and transaction data)), it will ask for Workbench.
To add to your previous qn, when you transport the entries to subsequent system it will always check the KEY FIELDS and then update. If you see a transport, then the table entries are represented by their key fields.
If you create new entries in your table and transport, it will add the records. Else it will modify them
Hope i am clear.
BR,
Suhas
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Jan 23, 2009 11:51 AM

What is the workbench request and customizing request.

can anybody explain what is workbench request and what is customizing request.

Workbench Requests
When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
Customizing requests
Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.

Can TVARVC entries go through Customizing Request

Hi,
Made some "CHANGES" to existing TVARVC entries and included them in a customizing request instead of a workbench request. Usually in the past I was sending them through workbench request. Is it ok to do this. Can I potentially screw up something.?
Will give points for the right answer. Thanks for reading.

Hi,
Are you maintaining the entries in this table via transaction sm31(Table maintenance) for table TVARV. Or are you going through the ABAP/4 workbench for a specific program.
In general maintaining variant parameters and transporting them is not a good idea, as inconsistancies can creep in between the difference systems(Dev, QA, and Prod).
Transaction SM31 allows you to Add/Delete or Change the contents of a stored parameter or selection_option. A check box on the maintenance screen provides you the option to include the changes in a transport. Given that the table is client independent the transport is likely to be a workbench request rather than customising.
The assignment of the parameter/selection-option to a screen variant can only be done via program maintenance. And the parameter then transported along with the program.
Table TVARVC is client dependent and as such entries in this table are consistent with customising requests. As a general principle customising requests are for client dependent transports, while workbench requests are for client independent transports.
Kind Regards
David Cooper

Difference between customizing request and workbench request?

Hi ,
What is the difference between customizing request and workbench request?
please reply.........

HI,
Workbench Requests
When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
Customizing requests
Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.
pl reward if it helps.
Thanks
Sadhu Kishore

Customizing request and Workbench request

Can some one clarify me the difference elaborately
Thanks
Krishna

Hi Krishna
Changes to cross-client Customizing objects and to Repository objects are recorded in Workbench requests
In workbench request .... it can be programs(repository objects) and cross client data (ie not specific to one client).
Changes to client-specific Customizing objects are recorded in Customizing requests.
Customer customized data designed for a specific client is transported to another client using customizing request. Most of the cases these requests are something like changing values in tables (that too client specific).
Hope it helps
regards
Srinivas

Customizing request for a workflow

Dear experts,
I have created a workflow. I want to move the workflow from one client to other for testing it. For this i need to transport workbench and customizing requests of my workflow. Can you please tell me how to find the workbench and customizing request of my workflow. Is there any option in SWDD which will show the specific workflow & customizing request for that workflow.

Hi,
se01 will help you find the transport with your workflow but not the any other transports which may be part of your workflow project.
se10 transaction can be used to see transports by user. Check off both customizing and workbench requests since you will have both types of transports. The user id needs to be that of the developer that created the transport. Modified vs Released - select both if you are not sure if the transports have been released or not.
Paul.

Customizing request & Workbench request

Dear all,
What is the differance between Customizing Request & workbench request?

Hi,
Workbench Requests
When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
Workbench requests record changes made to ABAP Workbench objects.
There are local and transportable Workbench requests. (Local Workbench requests have the target system <space>.)
The package of the object and the transport route settings in the Transport Management System determine whether changes are recorded in a local or a transportable Workbench request.
Customizing requests
Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.
Changes to Customizing settings are recorded in Customizing requests.
When you release the requests, the current status of the recorded settings is exported, and can then be imported into the consolidation system and, if necessary, into subsequent delivery systems.
The client settings determine whether
o changes to the Customizing settings are possible
o the changes are recorded
When you create Customizing requests, the transport target is automatically assigned the standard transport layer by the R/3 System.
Regards,
Satish

Need Customizing request instead of Workbench for Table Mainetnance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for