Net income value is less, its taken adding value

Hi Friends,
         I have design one profit report in sd , in that report we have taken material wise ,sold to party wise
and condition type, they end taken over all result ,its fine
Last one calculation part is there proft u2013 total   , the system taken add the values not less
What to do
profit     total     netincome(proft-total)
RS 1,728.06     RS 400.00     RS 1,728.06
0     0     RS 400.00
RS 1,728.06     RS 400.00     RS 2,128.06
RS 2,128.06 this is not write its add, its less the value RS 1,328.06 this is corret
Thanks
Edited by: solv_ti on Jun 21, 2010 11:39 AM

Hello;
Did you try to put a formula to mark RS 400 as negative?
Regards.

Similar Messages

Statistical Net Income Migration

Hello guru's
I have come across an issue with the migration of Statistical Net Income values, from ECCS to a SEM-BCS 6.0 system.
We are loading the prior year RFD Trial Balance from the historic system into P12, via BI tools.
We are setting the period of 1st consolidation in config and in the master data as P13, and running first consolidation in P13. This eliminates the Investment & Share Capital. Note, to exclude sub consol items from getting picked up in 1st consol, we are moving these values to a non consolidating movement type, and then reversing this in P14.
In P14, we put the sub consol values back to consolidating movemnt types, and we run the subsequent consolidation.
We then carry forward.
The problem is that the Statistical and Adjusted Statistical Net Income items are only populated with data with 1 years net income.
Should the values on these items be migrated from the old system, or should we try to get the new system to generate these entries correctly ?
Thanks

Eugene
You are right, the system should calculate what to populate these items with.
I believe the problem is that we have several years of NI, which each has been carried forward to PY RE. When we run the subsequent consolidation it is only picking up the current years NI.
I think we need to migrate all PY RE into the CY RE, so that all post acquistion earnings from these units is pushed into the Statistical Items when the subsequent consolidation is run.
Thanks

Very Urgent--Adding Header condition amount in Net order value of PO

Dear friends,
Our client has following requirement.
---In Purchase order ,Header conditions related to delivery costs are using.
--Currently when we add the header condition,that amount is not adding to the Net order value and not adding to the total value in the PO print document.But proportionaly distributing to the line items.
--Because of this two problems one is not adding to net order so not considered for release strategy,secondas it is not adding in the net order value,header condition amount also is not coming in the total value in the print out.
--Currently, this header amount is splitting and posting seperate line item for GR/IR clearing act in MIGO and MIRO..
I have removed the Statistical tick and accrual tick in IMG, then header amount is adding to the Net order value and adding in the total value in the PO print. But in MIGO/MIRO, This amount is adding to the GR/IR clearing act ,instead of seperate GR/IR line item in MIGO/MIRO documents, But client wants the postings shall be made similar to previous one.
I have checked with removing only Stastical key and not removing the accrual key.But header condition is not adding to Net order value. I have searched for User exits/BAdis,suitable are not found.
How the Header condition amount can be added to the Net order value without removing the Statistical key in IMG.Are there any User exit/BAdis,
Please suggest.
Regards,
Dayanand

Dear Sairam,
Thanks for your reply.
Asper your suggestions i tried as follows.
1) We have got condition types like surcharges/discounts before "Net inc dis"
and Delivery costs/accruals/frieghts after "Net inc dis".
2) My requirement is that whatever conditions types after Net inc dis like Del costs/Frieghts are not included in Net order value in PO,so amount is not included in Release strategy and print.Currently this amount is coming as seperate line itemGR/IR Clearing account in MIGO/MIRO.
3) Asper your suggestion,i tried with Surcharge condition existing before "Net inc Disc"--This is a header condition(Cond.cat is Insurance),but stastical tick is not there in Scema. I tried as it is ,amount is adding in Net order value.But seperate line item for this amount is not coming in MIGO/MIRO
4) When i ticked the accrual key and statistical tick and added Accrual-FR1,then PO created ,amount is not adding in Net order value.
5) When i removed only Stastical tick only even though amount is not adding.
6) When i removed the Accrual tick also i.e both the ticks then only amount is adding in Net order value.But Line item of the header condition is not dispalying as a seperate line item in MIGO/MIRO
For these Header conditions ,seperate line item shall come ,at the same time amount shall add in Net order Vaue for the purpose of including in the amount for Release strategy and print.
Please suggest how to do it.
Regards,
Dayanand

FG Valuation basis - Std Cost estimate or Net sale value whichever is less

Dear SAP Experts,
Query 1 -
Valuation of Finished goods is done on basis of standard cost estimate (CK24) or Net sale value whichever is less
*Net sale value u2013 Net sales ( Sales value minus Sales deductions)
Eg : Std cost estimate gives FG price as $100, whereas Net sale value price of FG $80,
      now the client wants FG values should be at $80
Is there any standard way, wherein SAP can capture whichever is less i.e standard cost estimate vs Net Sale Value
Pl let us know the options and which options would be ideal for query 1
Query 2 u2013 Can we use CRK1 and MR21 to manually change FG price whenever Net sale value is less than std cost estmate price?
u2022     In case the market value is less than the std cost estimate (CK11n) ,then Is this the approach to manually value FG price using CRK1 & MR21.
u2022     What could be the impacts if we follow this approach
For Eg: Impact on prev months WIP, Scrap, stock returns etc
u2022     We simulated CRK1 & MR21 and MR21 entries are posted successfully, however following below warning is the message is showed when CRK1 is executed
             Note u2013 Material Ledger is not active
Warning Message
Deleting current standard cost estimates can cause inconsistencies. Your comments please
Message no. CK669
Diagnosis
u2022     If you delete a current standard cost estimate, the fields for the cost estimate are set to zero in the material master record. If you use the material ledger, the standard prices in the material ledger master data are also deleted when you delete the current standard cost estimate. The material master record for the material thus does no longer contains a current standard price from a standard cost estimate.
u2022     If you delete an active standard cost estimate, you can no longer determine scrap, work in process and variations for previous periods.
u2022     In certain countries, it is a legal requirement to maintain records of standard pricing. Therefore, you should check whether you are obliged by law to keep records of your standard cost estimates. Please also contact the relevant accounting and inventory management departments.

Dear,
Query 1;
The FG or SFG will be valuated at Standard Cost there is no provision to enter Net sale value
Query 2:
Do not user CKR1 to delete Cost Estimate because it can bring lot of Descripenceies in CO, SAP do not recommend the same.
You can run the revaluation at the month end or revise your activity rates so that you standard price will be change accordingly and your inventory will be re valuated.
Hope it is clear, it not then please revert.
Br,Vivek

Net Book Value calculation Issue Manual Legacy Data Transfer

Dear All
I want to Upload balance of old fixed Asset in newly configure System that are managed manually in previous year, I want to Post Their previous Current Written Down Value and Current Accumulated Depreciation when i go via IMG Create Legacy Data Transfer and enter,
Take Over Value of assets I entered for example
Accusation Value 100,000
Accumulated ordinary depreciation (Old depreciation in Previous Years) RS.10,000
Net book Value Rs.110,000
and system Calculate the Depreciation on 110,000 as WDV 10% that is 11,000
My requirement is that it will Calculate it as 100000-10000
Depreciation should be calculated at a 90000 @ 10% WDV that is 9000
Please suggest me, how i can do.
or other path or T.code where i can do.
i am new please explain in detail.
Regard
Khalid mahmood

Dear Atif and AP
Issue is not with Depreciation key it is working well according to my requirement but the issue is that base value that the system use is wrong.
i want that the system calculate depreciation at Cumulative Acquisition value (Purchase /capitalize/ cost price) less Accumulated Depreciation
is equals to Written Down Value.
I want that system use WDV as a base in each year after deducting year depreciation or (Acqusition cost - Accumulated depreciation).
I post a new asset and assign depreciation key it working well as required.
But i going to post Old asset for example Rs.100000 in year 2006. its Accumulated depreciation is suppose Rs.30000 in Year end 2011.
i want to post that asset in year 2012 as 100000-30000 and WDV IS Rs.70000 ;
i want that it will use 70000 as a base in the coming year to calculate depreciation.
My response is 100000+30000 and use 130000 as base to calculate the ordinary depreciation for the next year.
Now Please read the first thread again and guide me according to my scenario.
or tell me how i post the old asset value and their depreciation.
Regard
Khalid Mahmood

PO Release Strategy not triggerred for particular Total Net Order Value

Dear,
I am currently facing the issue where release strategy for purchase orders is not getting triggered for a particular value or lower.
For order value 1 INR or less, no release strategy is triggered for new created PO. And for value > 1 INR release strategy is getting triggered.
All otehr PO characterstics are the same, I mean to say the values for other characterstics such as plant material group are identical.
But the characterstics for release for Total net order value are <= 30000 INR. There are two system copies, where in one system the same release strategy is working as expected. But in other system the above mentioned issue occurs. There is no differnce which I can see in the release strategy setup.
Please suggest for solution.
Thank you.
Warm Regards.

Dear All,
While looking further into the issue by going into debugging mode, we have found that in include LCLSCF2I, Internal table p_selection_criteria_tab , the value for ATFLV (Internal Floating point from) gets different values in the two systems. For example, in the affected system, for PO with 1INR tottal value, for one of the Total value chaaracterstics before INR characterstic, ATFLV value is 0,0000000000000000E+00, hence it gets out of loop and doesn't trigger release strategy.
But in another system for same PO values and release setup, ATFLV value is 1,0000000000000000E+00 for that characterstic.
May I know how the value for this field gets calculated.
Thank you.
Warm Regards.

Error while calculating the net present value

Dear experts,
Please help me in solving the following error.
I am trying to do project vaibility analysis through pre investment analysis in appropriation request, interm I'm trying to calculate the IRR for the project.
I have created the appropriation request and given all the data in that including the planed values for the project.
In Variants tab of appropriation request, preinv. analysis sub tab, i have clicked the button Calculate preinvestment analysis figures , ( I hvae not mentioned any values in that screen, its picking the plan cost from the planed values of the appropriation request) there I'm getting an error saying
Error while calculating the net present value
If I open the message it is as follows:
Error while calculating the net present value*
*Message no. AO215*
Diagnosis
An error occurred during calculation of the net present value.
The yield curve for determining the net present value is not completely maintained. Possible causes are:
1. Evaluation type IM01 does not exist (table ATSYC).
2. Yield curve types 9990 (bid) and 9991 (ask) have not been created (table JBD14) for the currency of the controlling area of the appropriation request.
3. Reference interest rates have not been created for the yield curves (tables T056R and JBD15).
4. Interest rates are not maintained for the complete planning time period for the reference interest rates.
5. Under certain circumstances, the standard exchange rate types 'G' and 'B' may be inconsistent.
Procedure
Check your Customizing settings:
1. SAP supplies the evaluation types.
Remember, SAP supplies the evaluation types in client 000. You have to copy them into your working clients. If you do not have them in your system, you can create them in Customizing for the Treasury component (Treasury Management -> Market Risk Management -> Evaluations -> Define Default Settings). Create evaluation type IM01 with bid yield curve type 9990 and ask yield curve type 9991.
2. In Customizing for appropriation requests (under Planning), create a bid yield curve type 9990 and an ask yield curve type for the currency of the controlling area of the appropriation request.
3. Create at least one reference interest rate for each yield curve.
4. Maintain the reference rates, starting at the minimum fron the point at which you you have planned costs or revenue.
5. Check Customizing of the exchange rate types 'G' and 'B' in the IMG under Global Settings -> Currencies.
I have checked all the procedures of the said customization and the values are similar to that of the error message, but still I'm unable to proceed further.
I have goe through the note 160375, but did not succeed on this issue.
Can any one help me out in solving the above error and also can any one explain me the process in SAP to calculate IRR?
Is there any more customization missing or whats wrong going in that process?
Please help me out...
Thanks in advance..
Regards,
Praveen.

Are you installing a Demo version of NetWeaver? If so please post your questions and search for answers here: SAP NetWeaver Application Server
If this a real full blown system please contact the OSS, via the Marketplace (service.sap.com) or by OSS transaction in your SAP System.

Help - i recently made put together a high quality movie for a relative, it has taken me months to complete and it goes for a total of 9 hours and 43 minutes ,however, it won't let me export the video at all! please help - its taken ages to make it!

Help - i recently made put together a high quality movie for a relative, it has taken me months to complete and it goes for a total of 9 hours and 43 minutes ,however, it won't let me export the video at all! please help - its taken ages to make it!

9 hours??!
Twice the length of a cinema epic?
How are you expecting to distribute it?
iDVD encoding settings:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=iDVD/7.0/en/11417.html
Short version:
Best Performance is for videos of up to 60 minutes
Best Quality is for videos of up to 120 minutes
Professional Quality is also for up to 120 minutes but even higher quality (and takes much longer)
That was for single-layer DVDs. Double these numbers for dual-layer DVDs.
Professional Quality: The Professional Quality option uses advanced technology to encode your video, resulting in the best quality of video possible on your burned DVD. You can select this option regardless of your project’s duration (up to 2 hours of video for a single-layer disc and 4 hours for a double-layer disc). Because Professional Quality encoding is time-consuming (requiring about twice as much time to encode a project as the High Quality option, for example) choose it only if you are not concerned abo
In both cases the maximum length includes titles, transitions and effects etc. Allow about 15 minutes for these.
You can use the amount of video in your project as a rough determination of which method to choose. If your project has an hour or less of video (for a single-layer disc), choose Best Performance. If it has between 1 and 2 hours of video (for a single-layer disc), choose High Quality. If you want the best possible encoding quality for projects that are up to 2 hours (for a single-layer disc), choose Professional Quality. This option takes about twice as long as the High Quality option, so select it only if time is not an issue for you.
Use the Capacity meter in the Project Info window (choose Project > Project Info) to determine how many minutes of video your project contains.
NOTE: With the Best Performance setting, you can turn background encoding off by choosing Advanced > “Encode in Background.” The checkmark is removed to show it’s no longer selected. Turning off background encoding can help performance if your system seems sluggish.
And whilst checking these settings in iDVD Preferences, make sure that the settings for NTSC/PAL and DV/DV Widescreen are also what you want.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1502?viewlocale=en_US

Net Income account in General Ledger

I have a requirement of finding out a period's (say June-00) Current Profit/loss(Income - Expenses) in GL.
I have enabled Average Balace Option in the Set of Books. I had specified a Net Income Account. Does Net Income account carry standard balances besides average balances? Is it equivalent to Profit / Loss figure for a period?
Any clarifications on this will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Can somebody

The net income account is defined a non-postable account to capture the net activity of all revenue and expense accounts. It stores the aggregate balances to compute the net income impact on the retained earnings average balances for any given period, quarter or year.
The primary difference between the non-postable net income account adn other balance sheet accounts, is that its balance does not roll forward when you open a new year. Instead, GL resets the account to zero when revenues and expenses are closed out to retained earnings at the end of the year.
You could query this account on line (Inquiry->Average) for the year end (Dec)to ensure that the defined net income account is resetting itself to zero.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by NRKMurthy:
I have a requirement of finding out a period's (say June-00) Current Profit/loss(Income - Expenses) in GL.
I have enabled Average Balace Option in the Set of Books. I had specified a Net Income Account. Does Net Income account carry standard balances besides average balances? Is it equivalent to Profit / Loss figure for a period?
Any clarifications on this will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Can somebody <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Move net income to balance sheet - NW version

Hi,
In BPC MS the function ROLLTOBS is used to move net income to balance sheet.
Now I'm using BPC NW (7.0.02) and I'm strugling to find a similar function. Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
/Lars

Lars,
I know this was quite some time ago, but I am having an issue getting this to work for me and I think I have everything setup correclty. Here is a summary of what I've done:
1. added the process chain RUNCALCACCOUNT in DataManager
2. modified Finance application to allow Account transformations (calculations)
3. created Business Rule to take account NetInc from datasrc All_Sources to account YTDNI / datasrc Other_Input (case sensitive) - saved and validated in 2 individual steps
4. Created CALCACCOUNT.LGF script logic with the following and save and validate:
"   *RUN_PROGRAM RUNCALCACCOUNT
     CATEGORY = ACTUAL
     CURRENCY = %RPTCURRENCY_SET%
     TID_RA = %TIME_SET%
     OTHER = [ENTITY=%ENTITY_SET%]
     *ENDRUN_PROGRAM
     *COMMIT    "
5. During testing, I select only one month and run the logic file directly thru DataManager then create a report to verify.
Any insigth you can provide me would be greatly appreciated.

Debit memo with negative net price value

Hi experts.
Can you help me ?
I have a debit memo process and its net price value is negative.
Return's flag isn't checked in customizing (VOV7).
Thanks a lot !
Renato

Hello,
if the order type (VBAK-VBTYP = 'K') for a debit memo request, then the returns flag should be set to 'X' in the maintainance of the item type (transaction VOV7).
the sign will be reversed in fv45pfop_preisfindung_
if the flag is set.
I hope that the information are helpful.
Regards
Claudia
If you are satisfied with the answer, please give Reward Points.

CT differences with Effect to Net income

Hi,
I am running CT for the current month i.e July 2010.
For one of the company code (9019), it was showing two steps under differences as below:
CT differences without having effect on Net income: XXX amount
CT differences with EFFECT on net income 1200 USD
Our group currency is USD
For all the months it will have postings like above, but with effect on NET income will be negligible i.e. always less than 1 USD. so there is no issue.
Now when I look into the balances using total records, the PNL items (All accounts) are equal to Zero in LC.
But In GC is showing the balance which is equal to USD 1200, exactly same amount as "CT differences with EFFECT on net income "
Could someone explain what is CT difference with effect of Net income and why PNL items in GC are not equal to zero.
Thanks in Advance,
Richard.

Hi Dan,
The issue is resolved after following the steps provided by you.
Also i have done one more mistake of assigning account type balance sheet instead of PNL in fs item, so it was mis leading the results.
In fact the issue is because of wrong accont type. But the solution provided by you works 100% but in the next period again i faced the same issue.
After correcting the account type the issue is resolved. Also executed previous month process again for better reporting.
Thanks a lot for your help provided. In the entire project you have helped a lot.
Many thanks for your support.
Regards,
Richard

User exit for pricing to calcumlate net sales value and taxat billing level

Hi,
Can anyone suggest me , which user exit i can used for below scenario.
Create a new user exit attached to pricing procedure ZXTNIC in order to exclude the conditions YTN1 & YTN2 from the calculation of the net sales value and include the value of the conditions YTN1 & YTN2 to the calculation of the Tax vale.
From pricing procedure ZXTNIC need the net value to be till line 500 only and exclude the value of the conditions YTN1 & YTN2
BACKGROUND
Inter-company invoice is not calculated correctly in terms on the net sales value. The calculation of the net sales value is correct as some conditions are included in the calculations which must be excluded.
The reason for creating the user exist is that any change in the pricing conditions class can not be used to exclude them from the net price, without totally changing the concept behind the conditions (new conditions, new access sequence in taxes, IC changes and so on).
FUNCTIONAL DETAILS
The user exit will run on the values of the line item and the header of the pricing conditions
The user exit will subtract the current net value from the value of the conditions YTN1 & YTN2, also the Tax value will be added to the value of the conditions YTN1 & YTN2.
Need the Net value = 8,032 and not 8,882
This value will be calculated as follows = Current Net u2013 YTN1 u2013 YTN2 = 8,882 u2013 0,773 u2013 0,077 = 8,032
Need the Tax value = 2,395 and not 1,545
This value will be calculated as follows = Current Tax + YTN1 + YTN2 = 1,545 + 0,773 + 0, 077 = 2,395
Regards,
Jayaram

solved

ME2K - Wrong net order value

Dear All,
In ME2K, System is not showing the net order value in the report. I have found a OSS note 985769 and implemented the same.
Now system is showing the netorder value in the report but its not calculating the net order value. Its just showing zero value.
Help me if you have faced this problem and fixed it.
Regards
Senthil Kumar

Hello Senthil,
Net order value in ME2K corresponds to net value stored in accounting (table EKKN-NETWR) which is filled only in case of service purchase order. So for service PO, system will display this in ME2K or ME2J report which are based on account data display but not for material PO.
This is not correspond to EKPO-NETWR.
Please, consider that EKKN-NETWR is not the same as EKPO-NETWR. They come from two different database tables. In the accounting view of the report, we list what is read from the database table EKKN. In the basic list, we read from EKPO. EKKN-NETWR is only used in service items, so you will see zero values for non-service item categories. The F1 help might have the sameexplanation for NETWR, and I could see how this might cause some confusion. However, the help is based on the data element, which is the same for both tables. It would not make sense for us to change thisreport.
I hope I have been able to clarify your doubts.
Regards,
Mauro

Not showing Net Order Value in PO Currency in ALV report

Dear all,
Good day.
In my ALV report i want to display net order value in PO currency which comes from ekpo-netwr field. But this field is showing 0.00 for all records. i,e value is not coming here. Please tell me how to show the value in ALV and how to show blank space when value is not in database.
Thanks.
Best regards.

Hi,
Place a break-point just before you call the ALV display "Reuse_alv_*".
Check the value here in the column price.
Most probably you do not have a value here which is why there is no value displayed.
Regards,
Jovito

Net income value is less, its taken adding value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for