NetGroup:post(), limit bitrate? message size?

Hye,
I read about stratus 2 that "posting message functionnality" on NetGroup class was expected for broadcasting small message (low bitrate). But could we have an idea about the max bitrate possible with this method? There is a size message posting limit or a bitrate posting limit which undermines the system?
In fact, I would like broadcasting data (ByteArray) for lots of peer, with a average bitrate of 96kbit/s
Is it possible?
(Sorry for my bad English)

Mmm exact, sorry, I misunderstood an another post on this forum! (English pb).
However, it says the following thing:
Support for live Application-Level Multicast — Allows a publisher
to deliver a live media stream and scale the stream delivery as wide as
needed. Application-level multicast reduces the load on a single
publisher, and distributes the delivery over multiple peers. This
functionality is designed for a small group of peers broadcasting large
messages (i.e. higher bitrate data).
If million connections of peer is possible, is it the same thing for 1:million broadcasting? (with NetStream.send)

Similar Messages

Easy question: Limit message size from any channel

Greetings Jay and SUNWmsgsr gurus,
Seems like a long time since I've posted in this forum. That's because things are working great! Anyway, I have a need to limit the message size for both outbound and incoming to 20MB. I added sourceblocklimit 20000 and blocklimit 20000 to my tcp_local line in imta.cnf.
This didn't seem to do the trick. Do you folks have another suggestion? Thanks for your help.
Sam K.

you've blocked messages over 20 megs in one channel. You have others.
tcp_intranet at least. If you have other channels you've created, you will need to add there, too.

WL5.1 max message size

          Does anyone know the practical JMS message size limit in weblogic 5.1? Can I send
          a 10 meg message? 20 meg?
          While we're on the subject, how does wl7 preform with similar sized messages?
          (we're actually sending messages from wl7 to wl5.1 via the bridge)
          Thanks


fred bloggs wrote:
          > Does anyone know the practical JMS message size limit in weblogic 5.1? Can I send
          > a 10 meg message? 20 meg?
          I think this question came up recently - I think there is no
          5.1 configurable but I'm not 100% sure. The related 6.0
          and up configurable is a network setting on the WL server
          (defaults to 10MB) for the particular protocol you
          are using (t3). There is no practical limit in message
          size except for memory limitations
          of the JVM (2GB), except that it impacts performance.
          You might try
          the "performance" newsgroup to see if there is a 5.1
          configurable.
          >
          > While we're on the subject, how does wl7 preform with similar sized messages?
          > (we're actually sending messages from wl7 to wl5.1 via the bridge)
          In general each release performs the same as or significantly
          better than previous releases.
          For JMS performance tuning
          info, including bridge tuning info,
          I highly recommend skimming through the JMS Performance
          Guide white-paper. You can find it here:
          http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/jms/index.jsp
          >
          > Thanks
          >
          >
          >
          >

Cant send a picture message, message size limit reached

My droid razor just recently started to not let me add pictures to messages. It says the pictures to large that it has to be resized, its always said that but then it would resize it and it would send. but now it is starting to say message size limit reached sorry, you cannot add this picture to your message i tryed to use old pictures in a message that ive previously been able to send and i get the same message. My pictures are set on widescreen 6MP right now and video resolution HD+ (1080p) i tryed changing these settings and it still doesnt work. i have pictures that are 1.2MP and they wont even send. it wont let me send a video or audio either only text. Please help!

zjoy622011-
I definitely want to help restore the devices capability of sending photos! Has the device gone through any recent updates? Is this just picture messaging, or also photo sharing like Facebook, Instagram, etc? If you are using any third party texting apps, I recommend trying the built-in messaging app instead. Also, what city & state are you located in? I want to ensure there are no issues related to the network involved here.
Keep me posted!
Thanks,
AdamE_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Setting a Default Organisation Message Size Limit and a Higher Limit on an Individual Mailbox

Ok. So here's the problem. I've read all the articles on setting message size limits for Organisation, Transport Send Connectors, Transport Receive Connectors, setting precedence, etc., but they don't detail how to solve this problem.
One person in our organisation is to get a raised message size limit for sending and receiving internally and externally. I've already set up limits on the Organisation Transport Global Settings, Send Connectors, Receive Connectors, etc. So,
as this individual requires a higher limit, I've raised the limits on their mailbox, and the aforementioned connector settings, etc., except the
Organisation Configuration / Hub Transport / Global Settings / Transport Settings / Maximum Receive
and Send Sizes. The theory is that I can keep these two values at the original lower setting as these are overridden by the individual's new, higher, mailbox settings, but they will continue to act as the default for other existing mailboxes
and newly created mailboxes. Right ? Wrong! For the individual's mailbox, this will only raise the limit for messages sent internally (not to or from external email addresses).
Now, I could change all existing mailboxes to have the old default lower limit using a PowerShell / EMS command, but this wouldn't work either. Newly created mailboxes will still default to the new larger limit. Most of our mailbox creation is
scripted, though some are created manually. I don't want to alter the script and inform the admins as this is too much work and admins will forget about the new limits. TBH, I'll probably forget about the new limits. That's just a messy inefficient
approach. What I want is to set a new default for message size limits, with the original low limits. I.e., a setting that applies to existing mailboxes with no explicit message size limits set, and also newly created mailboxes, but not any mailbox
with an explicitly specified higher message size limit. Any mailbox with explicitly specified higher limits should be able to send larger messages both internally
and externally. Can anyone help ? Like I said, I've already read the articles so I don't need links to these thanks. I'm more looking to people who have done this kind of thing already.
BTW, we are using Exchange 2007 SP3. It has a mailbox server Single Copy Cluster (SCC) with two nodes. It also has two Client Access / Hub Transport servers. Just so you know ;-)
-- huddie
"If you're not seeking help or offering it, you probably shouldn't be here."

Hi huddie71,
Thank you for your question.
I've raised the limits on their mailbox, and the aforementioned connector settings, etc.,
except the Organization Configuration / Hub Transport / Global Settings / Transport Settings / Maximum Receive and Send Sizes.
By my understand, we could modify the global settings by the following path:
Organization Configuration / Hub Transport / Global Settings / Transport Settings / Maximum Receive and Send Sizes.
Because it will work on existed user and new user without explicit message size limits sets.
If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know.
Best Regard,
Jim
Hi Jim-Xu. That would result in everyone getting an increased limit. I only want one person to have an increased limit. See the 2nd paragraph in my original post.
-- huddie71 ~~If you~re not seeking help or offering it, you probably shouldn~t be here.~~

Message size limit

Hi all,
I have a question regarding the message size for the mapping:
What is the size limit for messages when using the XSLT mapping methods?
What are the maximum message sizes (if any) for the other methods like ABAP mapping, Graphical mapping, JAVA Mapping and XSLT Mapping (JAVA) ?
Looking foward to hear from you:)
Regards
Markus

Hi Markus,
Just go through the belwo thread which talks about the same.
Wat is the maximu size of data XI can handle
Also go through the mapping performance which helps u in understanding the performance as well.
Mapping Performance:
/people/udo.martens/blog/2006/08/23/comparing-performance-of-mapping-programs
Thnx
Chirag
Reward points if it helps.

Ironport size limit exceeded message

Hi,
Wondering if anyone can help, we have a limit on the size of emails allowed to be sent out as per normal and when users exceed this limit they receive an email response which appears to be generated by one of our exchange servers, should they be receiving an email from the Ironport itself also? I'm asking because the response generated by the exchange server is self-explanatory to ourselves but not to the average user.
Regards,
Ross

If the limit is set on Exchange as well as the Ironport, the user will get a message from whichever box encounters the message first... in this case Exchange, which will bounce it back to the user.. the Ironport never sees the message.
If you want it bounce at the ironport, you have to remove or increase the limit on Exchange...

Config mail accounts in difference OUs have difference limit message size

Mail Server is installed by Netscape Messaging Server 4.15.In Directory Server have alot of Organizational unit.I want to config mail accounts in difference OUs have difference limit sended and recieved message size.
Ex: OU 1 ( acc1,acc2...) : I want these accounts only sended and recieved mail limit message size is 1MB
OU 2 ( acc1,acc2.....):I want these accounts only sended and recieved mail limit message size is 2MB
Pls help me,Thanks
Trang nguyen

It's not truly obvious how to do it, but by configuring different channels for each OU (using rewrite rules), you can configure maximum sizes for sending/receiving messages. If it's quotas you're asking for, 5.2 doesn't do "domain-based" quotas for enforcement, but 6.0 does.

Limit message size per recipient domain

Is there a feature to set maximum message size per recipient domain (incoming emails) in the roadmap maybe?

While you cannot do it by 'domains' for maximum message size limitations, you can limit the connection mail hosts.
IE: domain1.com may use the connecting mail host of mail.domain1.com
domain2.com may use the connection mail host of mx.domain2.com
Then you can create new sendergroups for the respective domains mail servers to match, and with the sendergroup you will need to create a new mail flow policy with the size limits you would like to impose.
Once this is done, simply add the mail.domain1.com into the respective sendergroup and it will impose this limitation.
Key points to note:
Size limits should account for MIME inflation.
IE: 10mb limitation you want to implement should be 14MB on the mail flow policy to account for MIME inflation.
Alternatively, if you would like to do it 'by domain'
SImply increase your mail flow policy for the sendergroup that these domains normally match (under default it would normally be UNKNOWNLIST) and have it at 14MB (to allow for 10MB emails)
Then run a message filter (so it gets actioned at the start)
FilterDomain1:
if (mail-from =="@domain1.com") AND (body-size > 5M)
drop();
Etc. to impose the limits this way.
Note:
Body size refers to the size of the message, including both headers and attachments. The body-size rule selects those messages where the body size compares as directed to a given number.

Group message size limit bug

Recently some friends set up a group chat with 13 members. The chat works fine for everyone except me. My phone seems to not want any group chats with more than 10 people and it just splits the chat and makes new chats always excluding a few people. This really makes no sense considering the group chat works fine for all the other iphone users in the chat.

Hi,
i need to set a message size limit that applies to
both incoming and outgoing mail. I see there is an
user-attribute I can set on LDAP, mailmsgmaxblocks,
but the reference guide says that it is: "The size in
units of MTA blocks of the largest message that can
be sent to this user". I want the limit to apply to
messages SENT by an user, too.
I don't think that this can be an user-based
attribute, because mail it would not apply to users
not belonging to local domains sending inbound mail,
but there is an MTA-wide option I can set to do
this?I did find this option in the 2005Q4 messaging server reference guide:
<snip>
LDAP_SOURCEBLOCKLIMIT: The LDAP attribute to specify the maximum number of
blocks allowed in a user�s message. The MTA rejects messages containing more blocks than this from a user. An MTA block is normally 1024 bytes, but this can be changed
with the BLOCK_SIZE option in the MTA option file. This is a user analog to the sourceblocklimit keyword and has no default.
</snip>
This seems to describe exactly what you are after, I haven't personally tried it before.
Implementing will require jumping through a few hoops:
1. Extend your directory schema to add a new user attribute (you will need to dig through directory server manuals for help on this).
2. Add LDAP_SOURCEBLOCKLIMT=<attribute from (1)>
3. Add <attribute from (1)> to the users entry set to the the number of blocks of the maximum email e.g. 1024 would be 1MB email limit.
To limit ALL emails across the MTA, both incoming and outgoing, change the BLOCK_LIMIT option.dat variable:
"Places an absolute limit on the size, in blocks, of any message that may be sent or received with the MTA. Any message exceeding this size is rejected. By default, the MTA
imposes no size limits. Note that the blocklimit channel keyword can be used to impose limits on a per-channel basis. The size in bytes of a block is specified with the BLOCK_SIZE option."
Regards,
Shane.

Outgoing Message Size Limit?

I realize that in SA or postfix.conf I can limit the size of incoming messages, but can/should I limit the size of outgoing messages?
Currently the limit is set at 10 MB in SA and this seems also to be throttling the outgoing message size to 10 MB -- does the limit work in both directions?
Postconf shows: messagesizelimit = 10485760 and client messages in excess of 10 MB are not being sent.
Cheers

I'm pretty sure this is a 2-way setting for both in and out mail. I would say basically the logic on this is what ever size mail you dish out you better be able to take it too, lol. Alex can chime in if I'm wrong. Nowadays 10MB is a good limit but be aware that the receiving mail servers need to be able to accept the size your sending as well. If you set your limit to high and people send file over the 10MB size you'll just be wasting bandwidth to your ISP since your server will send it out but it will get rejected once the other mail servers sees it's to big.

CEM message size limit

We are still running Cisco E-Mail Manager 5.0. Does anyone know if CEM has a limit on message/attachment size. There are messages (all with attachment larger that 1mb) in the Exchange mailbox for CEM that are not getting delivered to the CEM server. I sent a test message with attachment less than 1mb and it went through just fine. Anything larger just sits in the Exchange inbox.
If there's a limit, how can it be changed?

Wow, it's been ages since I worked on CEM.
There certainly is an attachment limit - that was one of the things they wanted to get away from with EIM. For some strange reason, the figure 2MB sticks in my mind as the upper limit.
You seem to be finding otherwise, though. I'll have a look at some old docs.
Regards,
Geoff

WLS7 JMS Max Message Size

          I have done a search and found many questions on Max Message size, but I didnt
          find any relating specifically to WLS7.
          Q1: Is there a JMS Message Size limit the same as the T3 Max Message size?
          Q2: Does the WLS JMS implementation "chunk" large JMS messages into multiple T3
          messages?
          Cheers,
          Nick


Hi Nick,
          The performance is hard to predict. It is highly dependent on message
          type, application overhead, persistence, store type, CPU and network
          speed, etc., so you will need to measure it yourself. I think you will
          find that once message size exceeds 100K, perhaps less, perhaps more,
          JMS throughput is directly proportional to message size. (eg. it takes
          the same amount of time to send 10 100K messages as it does to send 1
          1MB message.)
          I understand what your "chunking" question were about now. You may
          find it useful to know that since its earliest releases, WebLogic
          outbound requests from one JVM to another are "single threaded" from a
          layered application's point of view: outbound traffic from one
          application must wait until previous requests posted by other apps are sent.
          Tom, BEA
          Nick Minutello wrote:
          > Thanks Tom, for the answers.
          >
          > My questions, I guess, are getting to the bottom of whether I can send huge messages
          > over WLS JMS - in the region of 10's of megabytes.
          >
          > Naturally, I can always send smaller messages - but there are occasions where
          > I have very large messages (files, in fact) and I prefer to have all processing
          > on the server side rather than the JMS client side.
          >
          > What are your thoughts?
          >
          > -Nick
          >
          >
          > Tom Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
          >
          >>Hi Nick,
          >>
          >>Nick Minutello wrote:
          >>
          >>>I have done a search and found many questions on Max Message size,
          >>
          >>but I didnt
          >>
          >>>find any relating specifically to WLS7.
          >>>
          >>>Q1: Is there a JMS Message Size limit the same as the T3 Max Message
          >>
          >>size?
          >>
          >>Up to 7.0 there is no configurable for JMS max message size. In 8.1
          >>
          >>(public beta soon) it can be configured on the JMS server and/or on the
          >>
          >>JMS destination. In either case, the T3 max message size is a limiting
          >>
          >>factor.
          >>
          >>One thing to be aware of is that WL JMS aggregates asynchronous messages
          >>
          >>when pushing from server to asynchronous consumers - producing larger
          >>T3
          >>messages which can hit the T3 max limit. The number of messages that
          >>
          >>get aggregated is configurable on the WL connection factory
          >>(MessagesMaximum).
          >>
          >>
          >>>Q2: Does the WLS JMS implementation "chunk" large JMS messages into
          >>
          >>multiple T3
          >>
          >>>messages?
          >>
          >>Yes and No. (WebLogic "chunks" internally at the T3 layer, not the JMS
          >>
          >>layer.)
          >>
          >>
          >>>Cheers,
          >>>Nick
          >>
          >>Tom, BEA
          >>
          >
          >

Posting limit restriction ( UpTO 10000) for T Code FB60 - for specific GL

Dear All,
Posting limit restriction ( UpTO 10000) for T Code FB60 - for specific GL
Is it Possibal ?
Any other way to stop Posting Amt more than Rs 10000 ( Ten Thousand)
In specific T Code FB60
Required urgent Help,
Your early reply / solution is expected
Regards,
S Kulkarni

Hi,
Just go to OB28, define a validation (if you do not use one already), define one step, define the prerequisites on BSEG level of the account and define the check.
For example, you can use the validation for the following situation: You want to make sure that postings to the expense account "Telephone costs" can only be posted to the services cost center "Telephone". You can carry out the checks needed for this by using the validation.
Activities
If you want to define new validations, go through the following activities:
1. Place the cursor on a line in which company code and callup point are entered (you can enter company code and validation callup point via Edit -> New entries).
2. Afterwards select Environment -> Validation. You reach the first screen for maintaining a validation.
3. Select Validation -> Create. Enter the required name. After pressing ENTER, you come to an overview screen of the validation activities belonging to the validation.
4. Select Insert entry. On the next screen you can describe a new validation activity. You describe the check requirements and the actual check for this. The syntax to be used for this is described in the online help (F1 help) for the input fields for Requirements and Check. You can also define a message (warning or error message) which is sent if the check is not successful.
If you want to change validations which already exist, proceed as follows:
1. Place the cursor on an already existing entry and select Goto -> Validation.
2. On the next screen select Validation -> Display or Validation -> Change. After pressing ENTER, you get to the overview screen of the validation activities belonging to the validation. If you select Insert entry, you can carry out changes if necessary.
Regards,
Eli

DeserializeJSON - is there a limit on the size of the JSON data that can be converted?

I have some valid JSON data that's being converted successfully by DeserializeJSON... until it gets to a certain size, or that's certainly what appears to be happening. The breaking point seems to be somewhere in the neighborhood of 35,000 characters... about 35KB. When the conversion fails, it fails with a "JSON parsing failure: Unexpected end of JSON string" message. And when the conversion fails, the JSON data is deemed to be valid per tools like this one: http://www.freeformatter.com/json-validator.html.
So, is there a limit on the size of the JSON data that can be converted by DeserializeJSON?
Thanks!

Thanks Carl.
The JSON is being submitted in its entirety, confirmed by Fiddler. And it's actually being successfully saved to a SQL Server nvarchar(MAX) field too. I can validate that saved JSON.
I'm actually grabbing the JSON to convert directly from the SQL Server, and your comments / thoughts led me down the path of resolution.
Turns out that the JSON was being truncated prior to getting to the DeserializeJSON command, but it was the cfquery pull that was doing the truncating. The fix was to enable "long text retrieval (CLOB)" for this datasource in CF Admin. I'd never run into that before or even knew that this setting existed.
Thanks again for your comments!

NetGroup:post(), limit bitrate? message size?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for