Netstream consuming 100% of the CPU

Hi friends,
Netstream consuming 100% of the CPU of Mac OSX, and 55% of
Linux
Code:
private function testInit():void
var nc:NetConnection = new NetConnection();
nc.connect(null);
var nsMict:NetStream = new NetStream(nc);
nsMict.attachAudio(Microphone.getMicrophone());
Someone sure how to solve it? I am using flash player 9.0.124
Thank's!

This is a bug:
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-259
Thanks!

Similar Messages

Java Process Consuming 100% of Server CPU

Hi,
We have a new instance of CQ5 (version 5.4) running on a Windows 2003 SP2 Server. For some reason, which we can't determine, after a period of time a Java process on the system begins to consume 100% of the CPU and the system becomes totally unresponsive. Has anyone seen this before? Is there a fix for this?
RK

Does the it eventually recover on it's own? It's possible that the JVM is doing full garbage collection. How big is your max heap size? I suggest to add some garbage collection debugging in the JVM_OPTS to see if it is Java's garbage collection or not. Might as well check the heap too, to see if it's running our of memory.
Example;
-verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintTenuringDistribution -Xloggc:/tmp/gc.log -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:HeapDumpPath=/tmp
Ron

Firefox does not open when clicking on the icon, the firefox.exe process consumes 99 % of the CPU and my computer runs slowly.

I have been a happy user of Firefox for many years. Around last April first I opened Firefox and was offered an update to v 4.42.0.0 which I accepted. Installation seemingly went well. I forget now exactly what happened but the result has been that ever since April 1 I haven’t been able to open the Firefox browser when clicking on the Firefox icon. My computer now was running very slowly. I tried to uninstall Firefox, but a popup told me I couldn’t because Firefox was in use. This confused me because I couldn’t see it being used. Only now I have found that on Task Manager processes that “firefox.exe” was consuming 99 % of the CPU. After removing firefox.exe by clicking End Process my computer ran better. I uninstalled Firefox I had on my computer and installed Firefox 5.0. Unfortunately I have the same problems: Firefox does not open when clicking on the icon, the firefox.exe process consumes 99 % of the CPU and my computer runs slowly.

Born2die! Brilliant. I am a desktop clicker and never knew Firefox had a safe mode.
Thank You!
I was unable to start in safe mode initially. The second time I disabled all of the Add-Ons and she started up just fine. I enabled them one by one hoping to track down the culprit but the problem seems to have gone away.
BTW I am running ver. 3.6.8 (in response to cor-el's earlier post) and
Firefox is in the process of downloading 3.6.10 (which I am starting to think may have been what caused this whole problem to begin with)
Incidentally, whats up with all of the Java Console Add Ons?
I have:
Java Console 6.0.11, Java Console 6.0.13, Java Console 6.0.15
Java Console 6.0.17, Java Console 6.0.20, and Java Console 6.0.21
What are they? Do I need them? Can I uninstall them? Is this due to using Open Office?
Also, .NET Framework 0.0.0 Should I uninstall it?

Mail consumes 100% of my CPU power

Thats at least my theory. Activity viewer shows that something called osascript takes 48% of the CPU and kernel_tasks takes the rest. system together ends up between 90-100% of the CPU. When I look for parent processes for osascript I end up in kernel_taskes so I think the osa is responsibel for the hole ting. When I start up maill.app it looks like osascript starts up.
This is a crosspost because I think this now is a mail problem. But I realy dont know.
Dont know what to do and this makes computer pretty much useless. Fan full speed all the time.
Hers is a crashlog
powerbook Mac OS X (10.4.7) 2 gig RAM

That's my CPU and ram use with itunes running a live even,mail open and safari for right you,also i have opeb twitter,skype,ichat and activity monitor and connect a external drive..

Running 10.8.3 on an Intel iMac 27'. The Finder keeps grabbing over 100% of the CPU which seems to stop me from opening any folders. Only quitting the Finder from Activity monitor resets it to normal. Any ideas?

My Finder keeps grabbing over 100% of the CPU which seems to stop me from opening any folders.
Only quitting the Finder from Activity monitor resets it to normal.
Any ideas?

Nope, I don't have a "/Users/charon/Library/Mobile Documents" directory, let alone anything underneath it. Is that like an iCloud thing or something? I tend to avoid the Apple-supplied services when I can (I don't use iTunes either unless I can help it).
As an update, as of about two days later this problem seems to have solved itself. Possibly sleeping and waking did something to it (though that seems unlikely given how many times I rebooted), or else there was just some long-*** kernel process that finally worked itself out. But my system CPU is back down to normal and the cursor freezes are gone.
??? it is a mystery! ???

Access Connections on Win7 64-bit uses 100% of the CPU

I have been experiencing a problem with Access Connections 5.03 on a T61P where the process utilizes 100% of the CPU and does not get past the initial product title screen. Attaching a debugger to the process yields a stack trace for the spinning thread of:
>   003723f8()
    WindowsBase.ni.dll!65549683()
    [Frames below may be incorrect and/or missing, no symbols loaded for WindowsBase.ni.dll]
    PresentationCore.ni.dll!62926821()
    PresentationCore.ni.dll!62926b45()
    PresentationCore.ni.dll!6292697a()
    mscorlib.ni.dll!6ff39a63()
    PresentationCore.ni.dll!6292ed07()
    PresentationCore.ni.dll!6292e987()
    PresentationCore.ni.dll!6292e862()
    PresentationCore.ni.dll!6292e760()
    PresentationCore.ni.dll!6292e662()
    mscorwks.dll!_CallDescrWorker@20() + 0x33 bytes
    mscorwks.dll!_CallDescrWorkerWithHandler@24() + 0x9f bytes
    mscorwks.dll!ForwardCallToManagedMethod() + 0x39 bytes
    mscorwks.dll!DoUMThunkCallWorker() + 0x1b4 bytes
    mscorwks.dll!DoUMThunkCall() + 0xd3 bytes
    00d11105()
    wpfgfx_v0300.dll!CMilSlaveGlyphCache::EnsureGlyphBitmapsArePresent() + 0x31a9 bytes
    wpfgfx_v0300.dll!CMilSlaveGlyphCache::EnsureGlyphBitmapsArePresent() + 0x31a9 bytes
    PresentationCore.ni.dll!?MS.Internal.FontCache.CacheManager.SaveNativeCache@@00020112859415121501128594() + 0x14 bytes
I can provide a minidump with full heap for the process upon request.
Thank you.

check your version again you should have version 5.72 for win. 7
Thinkpad R61 7733-1GU
Thinkpad X61T 7762-54U
Thinkpad X60T 6363-4GU
Did a member help you today? Thank them with a Kudo!
If a post answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
Regards,
GMAC

OC4J_Portal Container consuming all of the CPU

This is something that started recently. I have opened a TAR, but no one has been able to figure out teh problem. We are running Portal 9.0.2.6.18 on Solaris and every couple of days the container jumps from < 1 % of the CPU, to 100% of one of the CPUs in the box. We currently have it divided into two islands - so sometimes it totally consumes 2 of the 4 CPUs in the box.
Nothing in the logs is useful, and even debug logs on the PPE didn't help. Anyone seen this before? Anyone have any troubleshooting thoughts?
I already have a TAR open, but no one seems to know what teh issue is.
Thanks -
Al

Albert,
It strikes me that this issue will turn out to be either resource or patch related. If your systems ran fine for 9 months and then started exhibiting logarithmic growth issues I would suggest that this is a JVM resource issue. The most recent update in the associated bug states
*** 06/22/05 07:33 am ***
@ Log file opmn/logs/OC4J_Portal.default_island.1 contains thousands of Broken
@ Pipe messages.
*** 06/22/05 07:36 am *** (CHG: Sta->11 Asg->PTLDDR)
*** 06/22/05 08:00 am ***
@ Assigned to Portal DDR queue for additional diagnosis.
So it seems that you are experiencing communication issues, and as it states in the bug the issue has been escalated to the DDR team for further investigation.
My suggestion would be to continue to work with Support on this issue as they have the resources, manpower and access to development that you need to resolve your issue.
I'll keep an eye on the SR & bug for you to ensure that it doesn't drift focus..
Regards
Jason.

Export - use 100% of the CPU

I have a problem do export images and sounds with the
captivate.... When i use the projetc, this is use 100% of de CPU,
somebody have any idea how can I change this???? if it´s
possible....
[]'s

If you don't get an answer here, and if you know Japanese well, you may want to search/ask in the Japanese forums:
https://discussionsjapan.apple.com

IMac using 100% of the CPU, but no processes in Activity Monitor show usage over 3%. What's going on?

This iMac is about 5 years old. It has the 2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processors, 2GB RAM, and is running 10.8.5. After rebooting the machine, CPU usage is low. After about 30 seconds, when using Activity Monitor, CPU usage bumps up to 100% and stays there without budging. When viewing the CPU tab near the botom, % User is about 95+%, and % System makes up the other 5%. They change slightly every second. The problem is, if I sort my Processes by % CPU, the largest user is Activity Monitor with around 2.3%. Everything else is at 0.0%. So there's something weird going on causing the CPU to max out and run hot, but I can't figure out what's causing it. Checking for applications to force quit doesn't show any issues, and repairing permissions doesn't do anything. Is there any way to figure out what's going on? I read about how to reset the System Management Controller, is this something I should do? Thank you for ANY help, it's driving me crazy!
EDIT: I figured it out! Browsing All Processes, I'm running a folding@home program, but I thought I uninstalled it! The process is called FahCore_a4. Is there any way to prevent it from showing up on boot? I want to get rid of it but I deleted the applications!

Be certain to check that you are viewing "All Processes" as opposed to "My Processes"

Downloading app causes storeagent process to consume 100% of a CPU core

This has happened twice now. Just downloaded Xcode 4.0.2 through the Mac App Store. This is a 4.59 GB download that took more than ten minutes. About 15% into the download, the storeagent process pegged a CPU core, and remained that way for the rest of the download. The CPU temperature shot up and the fans were going full blast. This must be an app store defect; there is no reason for any additional processing while the file is just downloading. Has anybody else experience this problem? I don't think you would notice it for a typical size application, but it should be obvious once you get over 1 GB.

I'm certian this is related to the speed of the connection (On the fly decryption, whatever...) as I'm sat on 1Gb link with zero contention and it (storeagent) makes my machine completely unuseable as all the cores are basically pegged to 100%.

Why does the process Report Crash stay active and take up over 100% of the CPU?

In addition to window-server taking an inordinate amount of CPU, I am seeing that the process "Report Crash" is sucking up 102% of the CPU and occasionally goes down to 90%. ***? What IS Apple doing these days? Their products are getting worse and worse!

Select that process and kill it in Activity Monitor, see if it comes back.

Dock taking up 100% of the cpu

Recently I went crazy partitioning my macbook pro's hard drive for linux and windows partitions and I partitioned so much that I corrupted something on my snow leopard partition. In activity monitor my dock ranges from taking up .2% of the cpu up to 99.6% of the cpu. I tried deleting all the configuration files found in ~/Library/Preferences (i heard doing this solves other problems and it fixed it for about an hour or so). The last option I can think of is to reinstall snow leopard but Im afraid I will loss all my data on snow leopard (linux and windows partitions can be erased if I have to) and I cant do any backups because I don't have a spare hard drive. Can anyone help me?

linuxmac09 wrote:
what can go wrong with a reinstallation of snow leopard that will erase my data?
all kinds of things. search these forums and you'll see a ton of stories of people loosing data while trying to upgrade without backups.
what should i use to backup my system? time machine?
time machine is an option. or you can make a bootable clone using CCCloner or Superduper. there see this link for more backup options
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7495315#7495315

Ocspd uses 100% of the cpu after upgrafde

After I upgraded my iMac to Mavericks, the ocspd process hogs the cpu according to the activity monitor. I tried using the Key Chain First Aid, repairing permissions, fscking, but nothing helped.

I've seen similar behaviour, was caused by browsing to a samba directory containing many many files from a macosx smb client.
Was more than 30000 files in a folder (images sequence for video work)
No problem on the same directory from a windows client.
It's related with case sensitive stuff, server is processing all the file case combinations.
So, just click on that directory from a maxosx client, and server will eat all his cpu, even if you stop browsing
Could it be your case ?
I've try to setup the server to be case unsensitive, but another problem appear, again only from macosx client : when converting copied file to default case, file is put to recycle bin (samba vfs), no problem from windows client, files are converted to default case without problem.
I'd like to try to force smbclient of mac clients to be case unsensitive, or may be compile latest samba on them too

When opening a page, FF sometimes hangs for several minutes, the main thread consuming 100% of the running core

I've not been able to detect a pattern of occurrence. It just happened now when I opened this page
http://www.pcinpact.com/actu/news/66460-amd-catalyst-rage-vsync-opengl.htm
soon after starting FireFox (which loaded the dozen tabs - in two windows - of my current session).
Here is the stack of the main thread, as shown in Process Explorer :
ntdll.dll!ZwQueryDirectoryFile+0xa
wow64.dll!Wow64EmulateAtlThunk+0x8c77
wow64.dll!Wow64SystemServiceEx+0xd7
wow64cpu.dll!TurboDispatchJumpAddressEnd+0x2d
wow64.dll!Wow64SystemServiceEx+0x1ce
wow64.dll!Wow64LdrpInitialize+0x429
ntdll.dll!RtlUniform+0x6e6
ntdll.dll!RtlCreateTagHeap+0xa7
ntdll.dll!LdrInitializeThunk+0xe
ntdll.dll!NtQueryDirectoryFile+0x12
xul.dll!??0Layer@layers@mozilla@@IAE@PAVLayerManager@12@PAX@Z+0x1589
xul.dll!NS_NewLocalFile_P+0xb536
xul.dll!?AccumulateMetricsForRun@gfxTextRun@@AAEXPAVgfxFont@@IIW4BoundingBoxType@2@PAVgfxContext@@PAVPropertyProvider@1@IIPAURunMetrics@2@@Z+0xdc07
xul.dll!?AccumulateMetricsForRun@gfxTextRun@@AAEXPAVgfxFont@@IIW4BoundingBoxType@2@PAVgfxContext@@PAVPropertyProvider@1@IIPAURunMetrics@2@@Z+0xf951
xul.dll!?Stroke@gfxContext@@QAEXXZ+0x2ad
xul.dll!?Stroke@gfxContext@@QAEXXZ+0x9ab
xul.dll!NS_InvokeByIndex_P+0x72f99
xul.dll!?SanitizeMetrics@gfxFont@@IAEXPAUMetrics@1@H@Z+0x1048
xul.dll!?Paint@gfxAlphaBoxBlur@@QAEXPAVgfxContext@@ABUgfxPoint@@@Z+0x2e2
xul.dll!?ReleaseTextRun@gfxTextRunCache@@SAXPAVgfxTextRun@@@Z+0x4f6
xul.dll!?TransformToNativeRect@gfxWindowsNativeDrawing@@QAEXABUgfxRect@@AAUtagRECT@@@Z+0x13c
xul.dll!??0ImageContainerOGL@layers@mozilla@@QAE@PAVLayerManagerOGL@12@@Z+0x1318
xul.dll!??0ImageContainerOGL@layers@mozilla@@QAE@PAVLayerManagerOGL@12@@Z+0x142c
xul.dll!??0gfxSkipCharsIterator@@QAE@ABV0@@Z+0x85a
xul.dll!??0ImageContainerOGL@layers@mozilla@@QAE@PAVLayerManagerOGL@12@@Z+0x1444
xul.dll!??0gfxSkipCharsIterator@@QAE@ABV0@@Z+0x85a
xul.dll!??0ImageContainerOGL@layers@mozilla@@QAE@PAVLayerManagerOGL@12@@Z+0x1444
xul.dll!??0gfxSkipCharsIterator@@QAE@ABV0@@Z+0x85a
the last two functions are called recursively over 40 times...

Today, I was able to open the older version of the template if I only viewed the code first. So I was able to narrow it down to one change I had made. I had changed:
<link href="/css/960grid.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
to:
<link href="http://mydomain.com/css/960grid.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
When I tried to save the document, Dreamweaver hanged. The document opened fine with all of the other changes I had made, although it couldn't find the CSS files (I had moved the site to another root locally).
This really looks like a bug in Dreamweaver to me. I've seen CSS links like this in other people's websites, so it does look like valid CSS to me. Is there a workaround for this?

Having tremendous difficulty with the new version of iTunes. Moving from a playlist to the main music library has iTunes using 100% of the cpu and listed as not responding. Not sure this new version was ready for release!

OK, issue seems to be when I've selected "Albums" as the view. Moving to "Songs" is OK. This problem just appeared with the new release. Anyone else having difficulty?

well nobody bothered to give me a hint on what to do, maybe because the problems with the new version of iTunes are really a lot, there is an enormous amount of people out there that have all sort of different problems including mine so I have decided to return to the previous version which works fine and wait untill the apple people come up with a decent product ....

Netstream consuming 100% of the CPU

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for