New files created with no group-write permission

We have OS X set up in Standard configuration.
We have one workgroup. When someone creates a new file in this workgroup, it is saved with permissions of "Username: Read/write", "Workgroup: read only", "Everyone: read only".
How do I change this to something sane? (i.e. Username: Read/write, Workgroup: Read/write, Everyone: No access)
Thanks in advance.

+When someone creates a new file ... (it gets POSIX) permissions of "Username: Read/write", "(group): read only", "Everyone: read only".+
This is perfectly normal.
*Two Permission Models* First, you probably already know that Mac OS X uses two models for permissions when determining effective access for files and folders. The two models are Standard POSIX (UNIX) permissions and Access Control Lists (ACLs).
*POSIX Permissions* POSIX permissions are very simple, and have some limitations. They consist of three "fields": an owner field, a group field, and an everyone else field. (There's also a special permissions field, but we'll skip that for this discussion.) The POSIX owner is always a user; it cannot be a group. The POSIX group represents one group, and the everyone else field covers any user who is neither the owner nor a member of the chosen POSIX group.
POSIX uses three bits to describe the access returned for each field. There is a bit for read, one for write, and one for execute (for folders, this means traverse, or see contents). Thus, there are eight possible POSIX permission combinations:
*POSIX Access Type ................... Binary Bit Representation ........... Decimal Bit Representation*
No Access .......................................................... 000 ......................... 0
Execute Only ...................................................... 001 ......................... 1
Write Only .......................................................... 010 ......................... 2
Read Only .......................................................... 100 ......................... 4
Write & Execute (Drop Box folder)....................... 011 ......................... 3
Read & Execute (Read-only folder) ..................... 101 ......................... 5
Read & Write ...................................................... 110 ......................... 6
Read, Write, and Execute (Read/write folder)...... 111 ......................... 7
It's helpful to know these decimal representations, because they provide a quick shorthand for describing POSIX access. Typically, we use the decimal shorthand like this: (decimal bit representation of the POSIX special permissions field)(... of the POSIX owner field)(... for the group field)(... for the everyone field). Thus, a combination like owner read, write, and execute, group read & execute, and everyone else read & execute is 0755: Special permissions are 0 (000 binary), owner is 7 (111 binary - read, write, execute), group is 5 (101 - read and execute), and everyone is the same as group (101).
*How POSIX Access is Determined for a Connecting User* In determining POSIX access to a file or folder, a user can only be "given" the access of POSIX owner, POSIX group, or POSIX everyone. The system first checks to see if the connecting user is the POSIX owner; if so, the user gets the permission bits assigned to the owner field. Otherwise, the user's primary group is compared to the POSIX group assigned to the file or folder; if they match, the user is given POSIX group access. If that fails, then the POSIX group is queried for a list of member users to see if the connecting user is a member of that group; if so, the user is given POSIX group access. If all three fail, then the user is given access assigned to everyone else.
*How POSIX Permissions are Set for Newly-Created Files and Folders* When new files or folders are created within a parent, the following determines their POSIX permissions:
1. The POSIX owner is the user who creates the file or folder.
2. The POSIX group is set to the group of the folder's parent.
3. POSIX permission bits (owner, group, everyone else) are set by the umask. The umask is 0022 by default, so default POSIX bits are 0755 (0644 for files) - owner read, write, group read, everyone read.
If the POSIX permissions were the extent of the permissions model, then we would have to either modify the umask (on each client) or adjust the server's behavior via an Inherit Permissions scheme. The first option is insecure, because you cannot just modify the umask for a particular server's share point - it would apply system-wide on the client computer, even for local files. The Inherit Permissions via POSIX was the method used by Mac OS X Server 10.3 and earlier.
Fortunately, you don't have to do either. That's where ACLs come in to play:
*ACL Permission Model* Access Control lists are just what you'd expect: a list of entries that describe what a user or group can or cannot do. Unlike POSIX, you can have a virtually unlimited number of ACL entries (or ACEs). Each ACE can apply to just a single user or a whole group of users. ACLs support two modes of operation, Allow or Deny, along with 24 unique controls arranged in four categories:
*Category ... Controls for Files Only ....... Folders Only .......................................................... Files & Folders*
Read ............... read and execute .............. list and search ........................................... readsecurity, readattr, readextattr
Write ............... write and append .............. delete_child, add_file, add_subdirectory .... delete, writeattr, writeextattr
Administer ............................................................................... ...................................... chown & writesecurity
Inherit ............ file_inherit ......................... directory_inherit, limit_inherit .................... only_inherit
*How ACL Access is Determined for a Connecting User* Since each ACL entry can be either Allow or Deny, the system makes two "tallies" for the connecting user: one for applicable Allow ACEs and one for applicable Deny ACEs. An ACE applies to a connecting user only if the ACE is specifically for that user or if the user is a member of the group to which the ACE applies. The tallies are created by adding all applicable ACEs for each Allow/Deny category. Thus, the ACLs return two things: a list of deny controls and a list of allow controls.
*How ACLs are Inherited to Newly-Created Files and Folders* When new files or folders are created within a parent, the following determines their ACL permissions:
1. If the file_inherit control is part of any listed ACE, that ACE is applied to newly-created files therein.
2. If the directory_inherit control is part of any listed ACE, that ACE is applied to newly-created folders.
*How ACLs and POSIX Permissions Work Together* The access level returned from POSIX and the two ACL tallies are combined in the following way to determine the effective permissions:
*Effective Permissions = (POSIX Access) + (ACL Allow tallies) - (ACL Deny tallies)*
For each unique connecting user, the effective permissions will be calculated in the previous way.
*Solving Your Problem* You can easily use effective permissions to your advantage to solve your problem. Simply enable ACLs on the volume that houses your troublesome share point, and add a new ACL entry for the desired workgroup, granting it all read, write, and inherit controls. This way, when users create new items in the share point, they automatically inherit that ACE. You'll also have to propagate permissions for all items that are already inside of the share point after you've added the ACE.
Here's an easy way to do both with an ACE granting writers_group read/write/inheritance on some share point using chmod form the command-line:
sudo chmod -R +a "writers_group allow readattr,readextattr,readsecurity,list,search,read,execute,\
writeattr,writeextattr,delete,deletechild,add_file,addsubdirectory,write,append,\
fileinherit,directoryinherit" /path/to/share_point
Hope this helps!
--Gerrit
Message was edited by: Gerrit DeWitt

Similar Messages

  • When Photoshop CS6 is invoked from PSE 11 Organizer why is a new file created with _edited-1 appende

    I just converted a large PSE 10 catalog to work with a downloaded trial version of PSE 11.  When I brought up the Organizer and clicked on the Editor button I selected Photoshop CS 6.  At that point the Organizer created an image stack with a new file on the top of the stack that had a file name that was the original file name with "_edited-1" appended to the end of it.  Is there any way to avoid this?  For me it is going to create a tedious step to delete the original file and rename the new file after editing.  For probably 98% of my editing I will use only the Adobe Camera Raw editor on my imported raw files (Nikon's .nef).  ACR puts the editing data in a sidecar .xmp file so there's no need to protect the original file from be mistakenly replaced by an edited version.

    That's not a new behaviour : in old versions choosing the external editor did create a copy in a version set.
    I don't have CS6, so I can't be specific, but I wonder why you should open CS6 if most of your images can be edited in ACR. For them, you only need to click 'Done' and that saves the edits in the xmp sidecar file. I guess most of the remaining files could be processed in the PSE11 editor and saved in any image format (jpeg, tiff, psd...). Only a minority would have to be processed in CS6***, and in that case, creating a new copy in a version set seems quite reasonable.
    Edit:
    *** in CS6 or the full ACR version of CS6. In my case, it's very rare that I need the other tabs in ACR.

  • Template File created in DreamWeaver Looks ok. But when a new file created with this template shows disordered

    I created a template file in DreamWeaver cs5. It is OK. and it looks like this, with Pink box showing the editable region. http://smsoftsolutions.com/downloads/test.jpg
    Now the problem is, when I create a NEW html file from this Template, in the DESIGN view, the template contents are shown in a flowing mode. ie. Absolutely positioned DIVs are showing in a disorderly way, as shown in this screenshot. http://smsoftsolutions.com/downloads/test2.jpg
    When I preview it in browser, it is showing as I expect. But only in the design mode, it is showing in a relatively positioned way.
    Can anyone tell me what I should do in the dreamweaver settings, to show the layout in a WYSIWYG way?

    Hi,
    Thank you for your reply.
    If I post the pages alone, the link to the images will be broken.
    The css files also will be broken.
    The css file should be in the folder css, images should be in the folder home_images, and template file should be in the folder templates.
    The link to three files are:
    1. HTML FILE
    http://smsoftsolutions.com/downloads/t.html
    2. TEMPLATE FILE
    http://smsoftsolutions.com/downloads/vetiver_master.dwt
    3.  CSS FILE
    http://smsoftsolutions.com/downloads/css/vetiver_css.css
    Sincerely,
    Tomy Sebastian
    >

  • I cannot update from OS 10.9.4 to 10.9.5. I get a message saying: File couldn't be installed error (513). I have configured my OS so that I have read and write permission followed by system with read and writ permission. Can someone help me? Thanks.

    I cannot update from OS X 10.9.4 t0 10.9.5> Whenever I try I get the following message: File couldn't be installed error (513) and something about not having the proper permission.  Under the Macintosh HD sharing and permissions settings I have customized the settings so that (Me) has read and write permission followed by the system with read and write permission, wheel and everyone have Read permissions.
    I have no problems updating apps such as Adobe CC or iTunes but cannot update the operating system, can someone help me? Thanks.

    1. Restart the computer in safe mode. Certain caches maintained by the system will be rebuilt.
    Safe mode is much slower to start up than normal. The next normal startup may also be somewhat slow.
    When the login screen appears, restart as usual (not in safe mode) and test. There's no need to log in while in safe mode.
    Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the startup volume is a software RAID, you can’t start in safe mode. In that case, go to Step 2.
    If there's no change after taking this step, continue.
    2. Back up all data before proceeding.
    Triple-click anywhere in the line below on this page to select it:
    /var/folders
    Right-click or control-click the highlighted line and select
              Services ▹ Reveal in Finder (or just Reveal)
    from the contextual menu.* A folder should open with an item named "folders" selected. Move the selected item to the Trash. You may be prompted for your administrator login password. Restart the computer and empty the Trash.
    *If you don't see the contextual menu item, copy the selected text to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination  command-C. In the Finder, select
              Go ▹ Go to Folder...
    from the menu bar and paste into the box that opens by pressing command-V. You won't see what you pasted because a line break is included. Press return.

  • File Sharing Permissions Problem When NEW Files Created

    My wife & I have a home office network setup for our business, and are having trouble with shared files over the network. We're both on Macs, and all of our client files reside on an internal hard drive in my Mac Pro. I've set her up as a "Sharing Only" user on my computer (which matches the username & password of her account on her iMac), and have properly setup file sharing in both the System Preferences, and in the directory itself that we want shared. I've also applied the permissions to all files & folders below the main folder, and she can view, open and save whatever she needs and it works great.
    *Here's where the problem comes in...* If either of us create a NEW file or folder, the other person doesn't have WRITE access to it (we can browse and open it fine). The second I go to update a file she created, it won't let me over-write it, and I have to go into the permissions for that specific file and give myself Read/Write access. I've experimented with "Groups", and assigned both of us a special group, and applied that group access to that directory, but it doesn't make any difference when a NEW file or folder is created - it doesn't copy the parent directory permissions to itself, it makes one of us the owner, and nobody else has access.
    Is there any way around this? We're both constantly creating new files, and it really hampers our workflow to have to keep re-applying file permissions every time one of us creates something new. Ideally, any new files created within that main client folder would automatically have the same permissions as the parent directory. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!!

    Here's how to do this with Access Control Lists.
    1) Go to System Preferences -> Accounts. Unlock the padlock. Click the + button. Make a new group. Call this group "sharing" for the purposes of this exercise. Add the users you want to the group.
    2) Make a new empty folder in /Users/Shared. Call it "sharefolder".
    3) Log in to an admin account and paste all three of these lines at once into Terminal:
    sudo chmod +a "sharing allow delete,chown,list,search,add_file,\
    addsubdirectory,delete_child,file_inherit,directoryinherit" \
    /Users/Shared/sharefolder
    4) From now on, any files you create or copy to the sharefolder or to any of its subfolders will inherit read+write permission for all users in the group. If you have any existing files that you want to move into the sharefolder, a simple move by drag & drop won't cause the permissions to propagate. you need to hold down the option key while dragging them in. This will copy them over, ensuring that the ACL permission is properly inherited.
    One other caveat: Files created by a small number of OS X apps won't inherit the permissions properly if saved directly into the ACL folder hierarchy. TextEdit is one such app. Save TextEdit files in a temporary location first, and then copy them in. Then they will have the correct permissions.

  • Accounts being created with administrative group rights

    Hello,
    The server is a Windows 2003 R2 Enterprise fully patched used for Shared Hosting purposes.  It runs Hsphere control panel.  I am trying to identify how the following hack is happening. 
    1) There are users being created with Administrative group rights.   Below is the EventViewer log for the user creation:
    User Account Created:
         New Account Name:    username
         New Domain:    PCNAME
         New Account ID:    PCNAME\username
         Caller User Name:    PCNAME$
         Caller Domain:    DOMAINNAME
         Caller Logon ID:    (0x0,0x3E7)
         Privileges        -
     Attributes:
         Sam Account Name:    username
         Display Name:    <value not set>
         User Principal Name:    -
         Home Directory:    <value not set>
         Home Drive:    <value not set>
         Script Path:    <value not set>
         Profile Path:    <value not set>
         User Workstations:    <value not set>
         Password Last Set:    <never>
         Account Expires:    <never>
         Primary Group ID:    513
         AllowedToDelegateTo:    -
         Old UAC Value:    0x2DAB2B0
         New UAC Value:    0x2DAB2B0
         User Account Control:    -
         User Parameters:    <value not set>
         Sid History:    -
         Logon Hours:    <value changed, but not displayed>
    There exists entries as well where the primary group ID is changed to the Administrative group, but I am omitting such.
    2) I tried to identify what Caller Logon ID:    (0x0,0x3E7) means.  I found out from here:
     http://blog.joeware.net/2013/01/14/2667/ that I can use LogonSessions.exe to identify it.
    Output from LogonSessions.exe is pasted below (snippet):
    [0] Logon session 00000000:000003e7:
        User name:    DOMAINNAME\PCNAME$
        Auth package: NTLM
        Logon type:   (none)
        Session:      0
        Sid:          S-1-5-18
        Logon time:   9/11/2014 12:41:53 PM
        Logon server:
        DNS Domain:   
        UPN:          
            4: System
          316: smss.exe
          364: csrss.exe
          392: winlogon.exe
          440: services.exe
          452: lsass.exe
          628: svchost.exe
          756: LMAgent.exe
          840: svchost.exe
         1000: spoolsv.exe
         1252: avagent.exe
         1268: camWMIAgent.exe
         1324: cissesrv.exe
         1380: cpqrcmc.exe
         1404: vcagent.exe
         1440: svchost.exe
         1480: HsQuotas.exe
         1740: inetinfo.exe
         1780: EmailAgent.exe
         1856: snmp.exe
         1884: sysdown.exe
         1920: smhstart.exe
         2192: svchost.exe
         2388: cmd.exe
         2396: hpsmhd.exe
         2444: cqmgserv.exe
         2464: cqmgstor.exe
         2484: HSphere.exe
         2596: wmiprvse.exe
         2676: cmd.exe
         2684: rotatelogs.exe
         2692: cmd.exe
         2700: rotatelogs.exe
         2732: searchindexer.exe
         2812: hpsmhd.exe
         2824: cqmghost.exe
         2852: svchost.exe
         3044: cmd.exe
         3052: rotatelogs.exe
         3080: cmd.exe
         3088: rotatelogs.exe
         5452: svchost.exe
         5596: GravitixService.exe
         7392: csrss.exe
         7232: winlogon.exe
         6888: csrss.exe
         9832: winlogon.exe
        10388: wawrapper.exe
        10352: cpqnimgt.exe
         9496: msiexec.exe
         6068: w3wp.exe
         4748: webalizer.exe
    3) I also learned from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/243330/en-us that   Sid:          S-1-5-18 means:
    SID: S-1-5-18
    Name: Local System
    Description: A service account that is used by the operating system
    That is all great info, but I am not sure I can put together what I have learned to attempt and get closer towards identifying how in the world users are being created and then being assigned administrative group rights.
    I am a Linux person mostly, but I am comfortable following a properly explained thread regarding windows 2003 R2 Enterprise issues.
    The server is fully patched and it is running Lumension security product.  What's more, Norman Malware tracker, tdskiller.exe (Kaspersky) and McAfee rootkitremover.exe have been run without any apparent Malware/Virus infection
    Hope someone with advanced admin skills can advise.
    Thank you

    Hi,
    You mentioned that, “I am trying to identify how the following hack is happening”, would you please tell us that why did you think the event represent a hacking behavior?
    In a Shared Server Hosting environment, the underlying hosting control panel tool (Hsphere in this case) should be creating only virtual FTP users with a specific group.  So no users with Administrative group should be ever created.  If this happens,
    it constitutes a breach of server security=positive hacking attempt.
    >how in the world users are being created and then being assigned administrative group rights.
    In addition, would you please be more specific about this question? Did you find the event message on a domain joined machine?
    I want to be able to understand in full how/what process is allowing users to be created with Admin rights.  In other words, I want to know what IP was used to issue the command, if ASP.net was used (abused in this case), or anything else related to
    it so that we can patch this particular hole.
    Best Regards,
    Amy

  • PDF files created with Primo PDF or Progeny PDF printer

    I am working on a computer with Windows Vista on it and I now have a problem when I create a PDF using the Primo PDF printer, or the Progeny PDF printer -- if Adobe is already open with a file, the new file appears with fuzzy colors. When I close Adobe, the files seem normal. Any idea why this happens? Has anybody had the same problem?

    Not a known problem. And the "already launched" problem points to an issue with Reader.
    Please submit some samples with a bug report for Reader to debug.
    Here is what the issue looks like (click to zoom) :
    On the left side is the PDF file opened with no other instances of Adobe Reader open. On the right side is what the exact same file looks like when opened after another instance of Reader (displaying another PDF file) was already open.
    It's as if the font rendering engine was incapable of multi-threading. Like Reader can only render the font properly if the PDF file in question is the only one it's got in RAM.
    Worth noting :
    Opening a 2nd PDF file with distorted fonts does not affect the first open PDF. That one continues to display normally. Only every subsequent instance of Reader will have this issue.
    Files were saved normally via Photoshop CS5, although this issue has been present for at least 2-3 versions if not more (only started saving PDF's around that time - it's quite possible this was ALWAYS an issue).
    This is strictly a SCREEN RENDERING ISSUE. The PDF file prints to paper just fine with uncorrupted fonts no matter how it looks on-screen.
    As mentioned earlier in the thread, this happens across multiple computers. Whether I create the PDF via Photoshop CS3 in WinXP or via Photoshop CS5 in Windows 7 on a completely different computer... it will have the same issues. Tried it at work, too -- miles away from home. Same issues. Graphic cards are also from different makes, and display the same issue.
    This happens to every single font in the document, regardless of how common or obscure a font it is. In this case, it's Helvetica Neue.
    Again, because this important : even if the fonts look distorted on-screen, they will print out on paper just fine. This is a screen rendering issue.
    Default PDF settings, no layers, vector data non-rasterized.
    Hope this helps.

  • Can't open DNG files created with Mac CS5 downloader in Mac CS4 Photoshop

    I recently installed CS5 on my mac but I kept CS4 installed as well.  I notice that I cannot open DNG files created with CS5 in Photoshop CS4.  Bridge CS4 shows the files only as icons - no image thumbnails.  I am able to open these same files on a Windows version of CS4.  Is there some plugin for my mac CS4 that will enable me to access the DNG files created with CS5?  Is there a way to use my CS5 downloader when converting my raw files from my camera to DNG files that will make them compatiple with PS and Bridge CS4?

    rr3rd wrote:
    Is there a way to use my CS5 downloader when converting my raw files from my camera to DNG files that will make them compatiple with PS and Bridge CS4?
    Well, yes...but you'll need to modify your DNG Converter prefs to allow for that. You''ll need a recent (ideally current DNG Converter 6.4.1 or above) and click on the DNG Converter preferences and select the correct DNG Converter options. Check DNG Converter 6.4.1 (the current version) and click on "Change Preferences" to be sure select Camera Raw 5.4 and later then make sure CS4 is updated to ACR 5.7 (which is the last version of ACR for CS4) However, the changes made to ACR 6.x really should be adopted since IQ for ACR 6.4.x is a lot better...

  • Captivate File Created with Trial Will Not Open in Paid for Captivate

    I have a file created by Trial version of captivate. It was created in a different computer. Now, I have to make some modification in the file. However, when I tried to open it with Captivate 5.5, I got the error shown below. I am not able to use the popular solution provided in this link Click here to view   because the file was not created in my computer. I believe that there is a lock on the file since it was created with Trial version of captivate. Is it possible that I send the file to a representative, and they look into it?

    Was the file created with the same version? You talk about 'trial', but the only trial version available at this moment is Captivate 8. You were never able to open a Captivate project in a previous version, that explains why you cannot open it in 5.5.

  • File created with Trial version cannot be opened by Captivate 5.5 (Ensure that the file isn't open, the file isn't damaged....etc.)

    Hi,
    I have a file created by Trial version of captivate. It was created in a different computer. Now, I have to make some modification in the file. However, when I tried to open it with Captivate 5.5, I got the error shown below. I am not able to use the popular solution provided in this link Click here to view   because the file was not created in my computer. I believe that there is a lock on the file since it was created with Trial version of captivate. Is it possible that I send the file to a representative, and they look into it?

    Was the file created with the same version? You talk about 'trial', but the only trial version available at this moment is Captivate 8. You were never able to open a Captivate project in a previous version, that explains why you cannot open it in 5.5.

  • DNG files created with LR4 do not show thumbnails

    Hi, 
    When using LR3 to create DNG files from my RAW files, those files would show me thumbnails of my image in Windows Explorer.  I am running Windows/7 (64) and have installed a CODEC from "Fast Picture Viewer" that allows thumbnails from RAW & DNG files to be shown.   It seems, however, that the thumbnails do not show for DNG's created with LR4.
    To Remedy this I uninstalled the CODEC.  Downloaded the most recent version and installed it but this did not fix the problem.
    I then went to the user forum for the CODEC product and searched for my problem.  I found a thread who's solution is to turn off "Embed Fast Load Data" when exporting to DNG and it fixes the problem.  I tried this and indeed it did fix it.  The responder went on to say ".....When this option is enabled the files created are no longer DNGs (just an undocumented private format of Adobe that no one else can read to this date)".   This statement surprised me as it is counter to what I understand Adobe created DNG to be.  Can I get some input on this comment as if true it is very troubling.
    My second question is that I see where to turn off the "Embed Fast Load Data" in the LR Export module, but where do I do the same thing in the Import module when I'm selecting import mode "Copy to DNG"?
    And, my thrid question is this.  If indeed the DNG files created by LR4 are proper DNG files and this CODEC is just flawed in some way, does anyone have a better way to allow image thumbnails to be shown in Windows Explorer?
    Thanks -- Dan

    Hi David,
    You testing does not coincide with mine.  I have consistently kept "Use
    lossy compression" turned off.  With lossy turned off, it seems that using
    Fast Data Load prevents the thumbnails from displaying whereas turning off
    "Fast Data Load" allows the thumbnail to be shown.
    Below is comment from Adobe confirming that they have yet to release the
    spec containing "Fast Data Load".
    From: Ian Lyons [email protected]
    Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 12:29 AM
    To: Califdan
    Subject: DNG files created with LR4 do not show
    thumbnails
    Re: DNG files created with LR4 do not show thumbnails
    created by Ian Lyons in Photoshop Lightroom - View the full discussion

  • Video from .ts files (created with Arcsoft Showbiz) played in accelerated.

    Hello everybody, can you explain me why in PREMIERE PRO CS6, the video from .ts files (created with Arcsoft Showbiz) is played in accelerated while the sound is played normally ?
    If it is normal, an update would be great
    Thank you.

    >imported from vhs (with Hauppage Colossu).
    As far as I know, the best way to digitize vhs tapes is with a http://www.grassvalley.com/products/converters product
    Model 55 is one way from tape to computer, model 110 allows exporting back to tape
    Files are DV AVI which edit very well in all versions of Premiere

  • Importing movie files created with SONY HDR-TG5

    Having trouble importing movie files created with this camera. Have had success importing direct from the camera using streamclip, but struggling with old files imported from our PC. These files have these two extensions; .modd and .m2ts

    Eric:
    Thank you. MPEG Slipstream worked great.
    Do you know if there is software available that would let me see what is in/copy the files in the Sony folder so that I might be able to copy the disk directly instead of having to copy the files off of it with Handbrake? Would having the QT add-on for the MPEG-2 playback component be helpful?
    Thanks again
    Tim

  • Nokia 3500 classic - .rms files created with junk ...

    I have purchased a Nokia 3500 classic in July 2008. I am using 1GB memory card and installing applications on it.
    Recently I found that though my memory card's capacity is 1GB, the space utilised was shown as 3.4GB. I was stunned. Then I opened the memory card in computer via usb cable and found that there are lot of .rms files created with junk characters file names and i am unable to delete the files. The only option left to me was format the memory card and I went for that. After formating, I again installed three applications and again i found that the file size of the application itself is increasing by some KBs.
    I have scanned it but no virus found.
    Why this is happening and what is the solution for it. Please help.

    it are the settings of the app(i think) so thas what thay are and the junk charecters make it hidden for EVRY SINGLE FILE MANAGER FOR J2ME(cell phone app)
    vinayshah wrote:
    I have purchased a Nokia 3500 classic in July 2008. I am using 1GB memory card and installing applications on it.
    Recently I found that though my memory card's capacity is 1GB, the space utilised was shown as 3.4GB. I was stunned. Then I opened the memory card in computer via usb cable and found that there are lot of .rms files created with junk characters file names and i am unable to delete the files. The only option left to me was format the memory card and I went for that. After formating, I again installed three applications and again i found that the file size of the application itself is increasing by some KBs.
    I have scanned it but no virus found.
    Why this is happening and what is the solution for it. Please help.

  • After Effects CS6 connot open files created with CC 12.1 Mac version

    After Effects CS6 connot open files created with CC 12.1 Mac version. Is there an update?
    I am running Windows 7 Pro and Adobe CS6 Suite with all updates

    You are never able to open projects from one version of After Effects in an earlier version. This has always been the case.
    You can use the command File > Save As > Save A Copy As CS6 to save a version of the project from After Effects CC (12) that can be opened in After Effects CS6 (11).

Maybe you are looking for