New fright condition type required

Hi
My client requested to create new condition type for fright
which should be caliculated with percentage of (Basic + ED)
how to create the conditon type

Hi Raghuram ,
U can create a condition record in M/06, Its better to create one by copying and make modifictaions as required.
You need to assign the new codition in M/08 (calculation scema).
You have to insert the condition in correct step before net price.
Cheers
Arun.

Similar Messages

Fright condition type

Hi all,
I need help related to fright condition processing.
IMP: I have created around 10000 Scheduling agreements.
these documents does not have the fright condition type.
now i am adding fright condition in all these documents.
problem:
1. After Making GR for these condition I can not change value of the condition type.do we have any solution for this?in my case fright value will keep on changing.
2. Is it possible to create new condition type which will give seperate account while posting GR.also excise will not get calculate on this condition,
thanking you people in advance
Regards
Satish Jadhav

hi. Ramki,
How do i check in FI, where the GL account is getting updated with the concerned Freight amount.
What is the -T-Code for checking the same.
Why, i am asking is because, i have the same situation, except that , mine is w.r.t to Surcharge.
As per my earlier configuration, the vendor account was not getting updated with the surcharge amount, only the Surcharge G/L account was getting updated sepearetely.
I had to pay the vendor minus the Surcharge amount, which was not the whole idea .
Now I have now re-configured the Pricing Procedure for ZC00 for Surcharge on quantity basis .
I have given Keys FRE and Accrual keys FR1 for the ZC00 and assigned a seperate GL account for the FR1 acrual key for the surcharge amount.
When i do MIRO, it is getting updated with the Surcharge amount in the total amount. Inventory amount credits with xxx and GR/IR a/c debited with xxx.
How do i check if the surcharge amount is going to the concerned G/L account?
I tried MR51, it does not figure there.
Is there any other T-COde where i can see the Surcharge amount being posted to the respective surcharge G/L account which i had assigned earlier.???
Much appreciated for ur response.
Mahesh

New created condition types from CRM to R3

I have do initial download with DNL_CUST_CNDALL. The condition customizing(pricing procedure, condition type, condition table...) have been downloaded from R3 to CRM.
In transaction R3AC4(Delta download) two entries for CONDCUSTOMIZING and CONDITIONS exist for delta download of condition customizing and record from R3 to CRM.
But when I created a newe condition type in R3, it is not automatically transfered to CRM. I also tried use transaction R3AR4 (request) to synchronize object DNL_CUST_CNDALL. But the new created condition type is still not availabe in CRM.
Could anyone give some help?
Regards,
Hui Wang

I have restart the DNL_CUST_CNDALL, the new created condition type are transfered to CRM. But when I create another new condition type again in R3, it is not transfered.
Any other advice?
Thanks!
> Hi,
>
> Do the initial load of DNL_CUST_CNDALL once again.
> This should help.
>
> Best regards,
> Vikash.

Condition type requirement

Hi Team,
I have a condition type requirement where C.Type ZXYZ has to be determined only when ZABC (List price) condition record is determined from a specific key combination only.
Would like your valuable inputs for achieving this.
Thanks in advance.
Best rgds
Rama

Thanks JM for the approach suggested. I will configure as stated and check.
Thanks JP for getting reply to one of my questions .
Few things to discuss,
My actual access sequence for ZABC condition type looks as shown below. First 2 levels are customer specific. Last 2 levels are Material specific.
1. ZABC condition records are created by an idoc (COND_A) in my case. Will i be able to upload condition supplement value here.
2. Can i create condition supplement records in mass load ? System already has huge amount of customer specific prices.
3. Do i don't require any access sequence now for ZXYZ condition type ?

New Tax condition type created in ECC, replicated to CRM

Hello All,
I have created a new tax condition type in ECC and through initial load replicate the same to CRM. Even pricing procedure repliction with new tax condition is also successful.
But, the new tax condition is not appearing in condition tab at item level when i create quotation in CRM.
Please advise.
Thanks and Regards
DJ

Hi
Iam facing with the same problem we have created new tax conditon in r/3 and we have replicated it into crm we can find in the pricing procedure of crm as the new tax condition type but iam unable to see that in the order conditions tab.
Could you please let me know the solution or could u please provide me witht he solution. to kmasthanrao at gmail com.
Thanks and Regards
Masthan

Problems in New Pricing Condition type

Dear SDN'ers!
Please help me to know if this is doable. Here is my requirement
If a line items qualifies for the per title unit minimum, but not the per order minimum no discount will be applied and vice versa, if a line item qualifies for the order unit minimum but not the per title unit minimum no meet comp discount will be applied.
Two new condition types will be configured say
ZCN1 - Group Condition say for e.g. 100 per order
ZCN2 - Item level condition say e.g. 10 per line item
Individually this is working when the order meets group condition ZCN1,i.e. 100 items and if line item meets ZCN2 i.e. 10 items the discount is applied. Currently the customer is getting the discount either way.
In simple words for each line item to qualify for discount it should meet both ZCN1 AND ZCN2, otherwise no discount order or item level discount should be applied.
I tried in USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP and USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in MV45AFZZ.
Since its working individually, I added check condition to see if XKOMV-KBETR value is not equal 0 for both ZCN1 OR ZCN2. If either of this is zero then it would have failed in one of the condition either order level or item level.
I have to modify the XKOMV-KBETR value for ZCN1 & ZCN2 to zero i.e. no discount. It displays correctly in the screen but it doesn't update the database. When i go to KONV and check the value its still showing the old discount.
Appreciate any help
Regards,
Badri

Hi Badrinath,
Please try pricing requirements in VOFM.
T/code VOFM> Requirements> Pricing > you can copy Standard routine (Price Change)> Write your own logic .
Hope this may help you.
Lanka

New fright condition

Hi
My client requested to create new condition type for fright
which should be caliculated with percentage of (Basic + ED)
how to create the conditon type
perentage of (Basic + Excise duty)

Hi
You can create any condition type, for example copy the existing condition and save it. And assign the same in caluclation schema.
And in the Calucation schema,define the caluculation of the freight is based on (Basic+ ED)
Regards,
raman

New VAT Condition Type

Hi Friends,
There is a business requirement to add a VAT Condition type where user should be allowed to add the amount manually whatever it would be. I have created a condition type by copying standard conditon type which belongs to TAX category and kept the following settings
Condition Class - 'D' Taxes
Cal Type - 'A' Percentage
Cond.Catg - 'D' Taxes
Rounding Rule - ' ' Commercial.
Under Tab - Changes which can be made
Manual Entries - 'C' Manual entries has priority
Item Condt - Checked
Amount/Perc - Checked
Rest all settings same.
I added this condition type in the Pricing Procedure.
Problem is the TAX condition type is not populating automatically in Pricing Condition. Secondly the Condition Value field is disabled. If this will be disabled then how the User will enter the TAX manually. Third i would like to know which Account Key shoiuld be used.
Please help. I am working on Pricing for the first time.

Hi,
1.You have maintained field manual entries as manual entry has priority then how it would come automatically into sales order?
Please share this condition type settings in pricing procedure
2.Share screen shot of condition tab of sales order with that condition type
3.It is depends upon you because there are many account keys related to tax like TX1,TX2 and TX3 etc. ( but what ever you are taking account keys in pricing procedure ,for them you have to maintain G/L's in OB40).
BR's,
Naren

When we clicked on Update for new pricing,condition type is repeated twice

Hi Friends,
For new pricing,I clicked on the Update pushbuttion in the conditions tab of sales order,Condition type is repeated twice .So value is increased.I checked in the pricing analysis,it is showing only once.
I searched all threads and I tried all the possibilities.
I checked exclusive indicator,it is correctly checked.
Condition type manual entries selected as B automatic as priority
Item condition check box is checked only.
Mandatory check box is selected in the Pricing procedure for that condition type.
Anything i missed out .
Please suggest me how to go.
Thanks in advance.
Rgds....VM
Edited by: vm on Nov 2, 2011 5:55 PM
Edited by: vm on Nov 2, 2011 5:56 PM

Condition type is repeated twice
Ensure that the pricing condition is not maintained for multiple combinations in VK11
G. Lakshmipathi

Creating new pricing condition type in srm ecs

Hi Guru's
I see that there is an option to select the Source system " local" , "other system, eg: R/3" while creating a new condition type in SRM. can you please let me know what is the importance of this? can we determine price in srm using backend pricing conditions? can we invoke the backend pricing procedure from srm and populate the price in SRM PO?
any helpful info would be appreciated
regards
deepu

Hi Nitin,
Appreciate your response. Can you please let me know how major development is it? if you can provide highlights that would be helpful. I do understand that we can customize the pricing procedure in SRM. Can you please share if you have any documentation regarding creating new condition types, access sequences, condition records in SRM similar to ECC? it would be appreciated if you can send it to pradeepwsu(gmail) id.
Thanks in advance
Deepu

Reg.Condition types required

Dear All
The below condition types are not in our Development system.
Where to get it. JMOP,JEC1,JVCS and JVRD
JMOP - Excise Duty
JEC1 - Cess
JVCS - CST
JVRD - VAT
Please help.
Thanks
Rajakumar

Yes,Every condition type doing different different calculations.
Therefore which condition type should be selected for CESS and ECESS. when I look for JEC1 and JSEP for CESS and ECESS. There is not available in condition type.
Please advise
Thanks
Rajakumar

Create a new condition type for tax... and assign in the Tax determniation

Hi,
I need to add custom condition tax type, i tried creating the condition in OBQ1 and add that condtion in FI pricing OBQ3, now I want to confirm what is basic conept means whenever we create on condtion in OQB1 and add in OBQ3.
i need to add that in Sales order and need to maunally populate that in the sales order.
could anybody suggest to create a new condition type for tax.(full process).
Thanks
shankar

Hi,
Goto the T.Code "V/06".Create one new "Z" condition type.
Maintain the Condition Class as "D(Taxes)".
Calculation type as "A(percentage)".
Cond. Category as "D(Tax)".
Select the tick mark for "Group Condition" if it is applicable for you.
In the next step assign this condition type to your pricing procedure by using the T.Code "V/08".
Also maintain access sequence by using the T.Code "V/07" and assign it to your Condition type.
Now this condition type will appeared in your sales order after maintain teh condition records.
Regards,
Krishna.

MIGO - Accounting - Condition type for Mark up posting to Inventory account

Hi All,
We have a requirement for posting intercompany Stock transfer between Company A and B, and the transfer price will be Moving Average Price (say $ 100) + Mark up (say 25% i.e., 25) of supplying plant.
Created a new PO pricing procedure, and created a new Accrual condition type ZMRK for markup and made it statistical posting. Also in the pricing procedure the Condition type we assigned an Account key ZM1 and Accrual Key ZMA. we tried posting the Goods receipts in the receiving Company B, and it is posting the following entry :
Invetory A/C                 DR         125               (note: Account key ZM1 was not considered for debit account for markup)
GR/IR     A/C                          CR      100
Markup Accrual   A/C             CR        25
REQUIREMENT: Our requirement is that the Mark-UP condition should not hit Inventory Account and should be debited to I/C Mark Up account (assigned to Account key ZM1) and entry should be as below:
Inventory A/C           DR         100
Markup A/C            DR           25
GR/IR     A/C                  CR            125 (accrual is not required, if we can include the markup into GR/IR account)
OR
Inventory A/C        DR       100
Markup      A/C        DR         25
GR/IR         A/C               CR       100
Markup Accrual A/C       CR         25
NOTE: The Material is maintained as Moving Average Price and we dont want to add the Mark Up cost into the MAP of the receiving plant.
Please check and let me know if there is a way to do a condition type in PO pricing procedure to solve the issue of not hitting the inventory posting for condition record or any other way to handle this requirement.
Thanks in advance,
Surya

If you dont want the mark up to come in invoice separately, why do you want it to hit a GR / IR account? ( in short why use del cost condition )
If hitting gr / ir is not a requirement and you just need to acrue it, try the following
PB00 to take 100
create 2 conditions one positve and one negative ( accrual, without condition category ) to take the value 10
the + and - will cancel in the inventory account; you can accrue to different accrual accounts

Condition type to be loaded on Material cost after Taxes but shouldn't change Tax base Amount.

Customer requirement is that they want to deduct some amount after the Taxes (after BASB) &t load this amount value after taxes on Material cost (hence accrual KEY can't be used). but with the addition of this new condition type (for deduction) it shouldn't change the base amount for Tax condition type (BASB).
Basic Problem : new condition type value to be load on material (after taxes). but this condition value shouldn't change the Net price of PO(amount in BASB condition of Tax) so that base amount (BASB) of Tax procedure remain unchanged.
(Since it is to be loaded on material hence i cant use account key definitely. Also this cost to be loaded on material after taxes)
Ex -             PBXX =     100 base price
                 Freight =       20
   Tax base amnt =     120
               Tax (5%)=          6
                      Total =    126
     Other Charges=      10 (this 10 Rs amount in this condition type required to be loaded on material cost, at the same time this condition value shouldn't change the base amount for the Tax (BASB)
Please suggest (purpose is to load the deduction on material cost after Taxes & same time it shouldn't change the the amount after Tax base calculation)

Hi,
   Your condition type is without acrual flag in M/06. No acrual key is maintained in the MM pricing procedure.
   To achieve your requirement, maintain subtotal 6 against the condition type in your MM pricing procedure in M/08.
   Maintain the base type calc procedure as 362 against your BASB condition type in tax procedure. Keep the field blank for the tax condition type (VAT or CST / ED etc)
   Test the scenario again with a new PO. System will show the condition value in net amount field in PO, but the same wont be copied to BASB in tax procedure. Check the taxes pop up. Check the same and revert back.
Note: Similar requirement (not exact) for acrual conditions are mentioned in my doc: Tax Calculation on Freight - Different Scenarios You may refer it if required.
Regards,
AKPT

MM Pricing procedure - Condition type post to different GL account in MAP

Hi All,
We have a requirement for posting intercompany Stock transfer between Company A and B, and the transfer price will be Moving Average Price (say $ 100) + Mark up (say 25% i.e., 25) of supplying plant.
Created a new PO pricing procedure, and created a new Accrual condition type ZMRK for markup and made it statistical posting. Also in the pricing procedure the Condition type we assigned an Account key ZM1 and Accrual Key ZMA. we tried posting the Goods receipts in the receiving Company B, and it is posting the following entry :
Invetory A/C DR 125 (note: Account key ZM1 was not considered for debit account for markup)
GR/IR A/C CR 100
Markup Accrual A/C CR 25
REQUIREMENT: Our requirement is that the Mark-UP condition should not hit Inventory Account and should be debited to I/C Mark Up account (assigned to Account key ZM1) and entry should be as below:
Inventory A/C DR 100
Markup A/C DR 25
GR/IR A/C CR 125 (accrual is not required, if we can include the markup into GR/IR account)
OR
Inventory A/C DR 100
Markup A/C DR 25
GR/IR A/C CR 100
Markup Accrual A/C CR 25
NOTE: The Material is maintained as Moving Average Price and we dont want to add the Mark Up cost into the MAP of the receiving plant.
Please check and let me know if there is a way to do a condition type in PO pricing procedure to solve the issue of not hitting the inventory posting for condition record or any other way to handle this requirement.
Thanks in advance,
Surya

Hey surya,
I am also facing the same issue. Can you pls let me know whether you achieved this using any standard configuration.

New fright condition type required

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for