New Video Editing Monitor

Hi guys.
I regularly work with video editing and I'm looking for a new monitor, my budget is not very high so I need to do a good choice.
For me the most important thing is image quality, I need a monitor I can trust the colors.
I was thinking of getting a DELL monitor because I always heard good things about them.
I would really apreciate if you could help me.
Thanks in advance.
César

César_Sousa wrote:
For me the most important thing is image quality, I need a monitor I can trust the colors.
Depends on what your output will be. If you are only going to show your video on the web, then a computer monitor that you can get a good calibration on should do fine. Calibration buys you a defined working space -- a solid neutral axis, no color casts, known edges of gamut, proper contrast, etc. All monitors will vary from this to some degree, but your calibrated monitor will show you the median, which is what you want for WYSIWYG work. So the people looking at your web videos will see something pretty close to what you intended.
OTOH, if you output will be DVD / BD, or broadcast TV, few computer monitors will show you the correct working space, which for HDTV is Rec.709. If you want WYSIWYG, you'll have to have Rec.709, there's no real way around it. This will take a production monitor (or an expensive computer monitor -- a couple of the Eizos can do this, and the HP Dreamcolor if it's still in production), which is considerably more expensive than a computer monitor. Low end production monitors start around 10x your budget, largely because they are made in much smaller numbers than computer monitors, and have much higher specifications; they just cost more to make.
If you want to output for a film print, you're talking real money. It's been awhile; I don't remember what the "standard" film working space is called, and of course it will vary somewhat depending on the film stock and the film recorder being targeted. But making a film print for distribution is sort of a silly thing to do these days.
A better path would be to a DCP (digital cinema package) which requires the CIE XYZ color space. There are monitors that support this too, and way beyond most budgets, save those of post-production houses.
If you are stuck with your budget and still want to author DVDs, about the best you can do is use a decent computer monitor, use the sRGB (not Adobe RGB or any wider gamut working space), calibrate it (without calibration you've got little hope of WYSISYG), and bump your contrast up to approximate Rec.709. Then work primarily off your scopes (waveform monitor, vectorscope, RGB parade) and not primarily off what you see. Burn a DVD / BD, and iterate making corrections and burning discs until you get what you want. It's an imprecise and much slower workflow, but it's doable in a budget pinch.
EDIT: You might also want to pick up a copy of Van Hurkman's Color Correction Handbook. Does a much better job explaining what you need than I can possibly do. And it's a wonderfully accessible tour of color correction. Answers questions you haven't thought to ask yet. At least, it does for me.

Similar Messages

  • New video editing pc.. will this work ? i'm new here, please help me out

    hi everybody my name is mark, . i really hope i write and express myself correctly
    first of all i'd like to say i love this forum. there are some brilliant ppl here with great advice.
    special props to Mr Harm Millaard.. wow u know sum serious s*** !
    i'm a pro musician my thing has always been protools, recording production etc. its time for me to get into video using adobe premiere pro
    mostly i'll be doing my own music vids for my solo projects and for my band as well as professionally done as possible. i'm a nebie at all things video but i'm totally obsessive when it come to creative projects. it helps with the learning curve (:
    this is my courant rig setup
    http://http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131405
    http://CPU INTEL|CORE I5 750 2.66G R
    http://MEM 4Gx2|GSKILL F3-10666CL9D-8GBRL
    3 Wd hd's 160 500 and 640 gb's
    2 monitors 22' hanns g and a 19 "something
    i believe a 400 or 450 w powersupply
    stock vidow card
    2 cd/dvd
    i think that covers the basics
    AFTER OVER A WEEK OF RESEARCHING AND NO SLEEP THIS IS WHAT I CAME UP WITH FOR MY NEW RIG
    http://ASUS P6X58D Premium LGA 1366 Intel X58 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard
    http://Intel Core i7-950 Bloomfield 3.06GHz LGA 1366 130W Quad-Core Processor BX80601950
    http://G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 12GB (3 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory Model F3-12800CL9T-12GBRL
    http://HITACHI Deskstar 7K3000 HDS723020BLA642 (0f12115) 2TB 7200 RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive
    http://Western Digital VelociRaptor WD1500HLFS 150GB 10000 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive
    http://EVGA 012-P3-1470-AR GeForce GTX 470 (Fermi) 1280MB 320-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
    http://Thermaltake Black Widow W0319RU 850W ATX 12V v2.3, EPS 12V v2.91 CrossFire Certified 80 PLUS BRONZE Certified Modular Active PFC
    http://Antec Nine Hundred Black Steel ATX Mid Tower Computer Case
    total 1,399.92      i'm pretty much at my budget max
    will this setup be able to handle both my protools and adobe premier cs5? am i missing something ?
    what would be the best  HD set up wise for max audio/video performance  ? i was thinking a dual boot ?
    with  2 new hd's i'll have 5 all told.
      3 for video... 150 veloci raptor  2tb Hitachi and WD 640
    ..2 for protools... the wd 160 and the WD 500
    i guess i'm looking for the best way to set up my rig for max audio/video performance and pass the information on to my cuz who's in the pc building biz his thing is gaming not so much video editing.
    i really hope i wrote this out correctly so everybody can understand what i'm trying to say and will be able to give me the proper guidance i need
    let the suggestions begin
    thank u for your time
    Message was edited by: iammajick

    thanks for your support guys. it now looks like i'm changing up  my rig again. looks like were going to be going with a RAID set up
    3 x http://Western Digital Caviar Black WD1002FAEX 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive
    1  http://Western Digital Caviar Black WD6401AALS 640GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive which i already have on the rig i'm using
      my cousin gino orffitelli who's mainly a gamer builder for his company  ePro had this to say in an email to me last nite.. he gave kool props to the adobe forums
    'finally had a few min read through your email and skim the links you made in adobe'.....'as far as storage is concerend i believe the mobo's your looking at support RAID and from what i read thanks to your links, RAID 5 offers the best performance and saftey which means 4 HDD's.....' with the knowlege base your building and contacts u have you and i may just open a new direction for ePRO'.....
    i try my hardest to understand RAID but since i'm a novice with computers its really hard for me to grasp it...http://forums.adobe.com/thread/525263
    my brain is in overload insane trying to process all this (:
    so guys... RAID 5 with the rest of the hardware i'll be using  ?
      like i said i'd like to have  the max performance for my  audio/vidio rig.
    thanks again guys
    mark

  • Photo vs Video editing Monitors. Any difference?

    Hey guys, I'm in the market for a new monitor, primarily for stills editing, but I want to make sure it's not just capable of, but GOOD for video editing/grading too (I'm new to it, but definitely plan to do a lot of it).
    I'm looking at either an NEC or EIZO Monitor - 27" (Maybe 24"), but I haven't decided which one yet. This is primarily because they are the best screens for stills. If that doesn't hold true for video, please let me know what other brands/models I should look at.
    Are there any differences between a good stills and a good video editing screen? What should I be on the lookout for?
    I'm guessing response time would be one factor? The monitors I'm looking at seem to be about 6ms, although some are at around 8ms. (But I know there are 2ms monitors out there). Is that a major concern?
    Anything else?
    Cheers!
    Ben

    Haha, of course not.The full benefits? Look no further than LG 105" 5K TV
    That is one heck of a TV. We are not that far from having the entire wall be a TV screen. It will most likely happen in my lifetime. It will certainly change the way houses are built, I imagine.
    I was wondering if there's any use in a 1080p screen on my 5" Nexus 5, or in Retina displays on 15" MBPs.
    That is kind of my point. I carry a smartphone with a 1920X1080 screen, and I seriously doubt that I would notice if it was replaced by a 1280X720 screen. After all, I don't hold it up to my eyes. On the other hand, there are times when I feel like doing that when I am watching software tutorials. But my eyes can't focus that close, so what is the point in such a high pixel count screen?
    At 15" it might make a difference though.
    My current 2560x1600 30-incher that I've been using for 5+ years was a huge step up from 1920x1200 24-inchers, and I expect 4K, even in a smaller form factor, would be a boon to use and work with.
    I can see the point in a 2560X1600 for photography, even though I would have trouble justifying the cost. If I continue with photography in a more professional vein, I might have to consider something with a very high resolution. It might be a couple of years or more before I upgrade from my camera that can shoot 5 frames per second for quite a while, to one that shoots 24 frames per second indefinitely. We are really close and those CinemaRAW cameras are pretty exciting.
    My question remains. You went from 24" to 30" when you went to the higher pixel count. Would it have been better even on a 24" screen? Perhaps. But how much better? We still need a good bang for our buck. Right? It has to be enough better to make it worth the money. How much better is certainly an individual thing with every user.
    So, I imagine that 4K on a 42" or so might make a huge amount of sense, but until these old eyes see 4K on a 28" screen, I won't know if it is right for me.

  • New video editing system for AE, GPU questions

    Hi all,
    I am about to configure a new system to use mainly for After Effects CS6, and Premiere CS6. I'm experiencing some difficulties choosing the right GPU.. If any of you could take the time to answer these question for me..it would be greatly appreciated!
    - I read the GTX 7xx with Kepler structure aren't supported/CUDA cores aren't used, is this true of do they work fine?
    - Does a good video card (with 1000+ CUDA cores) only help for speeding Ray-traced 3D, or will the overall editing experience be faster as well? ('live preview' while editing 'normal video', as well as the final render?)
    - What are the critical factors to look for in a video card for editing? (GDDR RAM, Base Clock, Memory Speed, Memory Interface Width, Memory Bandwith CUDA cores) I mainly work with 1080P digital SLR video and video effects, not a huge amount of 3d texts etc.
    - If i would choose the GPU as render engine, will the work be done purely by the GPU, of will it just 'assist' the CPU?
    - So far, i think the GTX 760 would be a good option, what is your opinion about this card for AE editing? Would this be a good choice or will a GTX 6xx or GTX 580 be a much better option? My budget for the whole system (without monitor etc.) is max. 1000 euro.
    - Would buying an SSD for storing the program files and the project files, be helpful? Or won't this increase the speed in editing by too much?
    The system I have on my mind so far, recommendations and changes are very welcome..
    MSI Z87-G45 Gaming
    Intel® Core™ i7-4770K
    ASUS GTX760-DC2OC-2GD5
    GeIL 16 GB DDR3-1600 Kit
    Seagate Desktop SSHD, 2 TB
    Cooler Master B700

    The GPU acceleration for Premiere is completely different than the Ray tracer acceleration in AE. The GPU specifications along with the system ram and CPU cores/clock absolutely effect the performance of the playback in Premiere. Which means selecting the correct GPU is based on Premiere's MPE acceleration and the workflow/media used. The concept that comes into play here is processing latency. A older card with 1GB of vram and a single or dual core CPU may be able to playback a single 1080 stream by itself without any scaling. However as soon as any effects or frame alterations are added then the time it takes for the data to process at the cpu, buffer into ram, and then process through the GPU is to long to maintain the playback. The clock speed of CPU, Ram, and GPU/Vram all come into play as to how long it takes for this entire pipeline to process. The amount of threads and cores decide how much data can process at any point in time. The more layers and effects to process along with frame changes, the more data that has to be processed in any time segment required for playback. This is similar to how much water needs to go through a pipe. This can be increased by either increasing the size of the pipe or the Water pressure in the pipe by how fast the water is fed into the pipe. Both aspects have their limitations based on where the water is coming from and going to and what the conditions required are. A balance is normally required between both the size of the pipe and the amount of water/pressure sent into the pipe. However the greater the volume of water required at any time segment the greater both aspects must be increased. IE this translates over into clock speed equals water pressure and threads equal size. SSD's also have a significant aspect on processing latency. The latency of SSD drives is a fraction of mechanical drives. This means the amount of time it takes for SSD drives to handle all of the read or write requests made by the application is significantly lower. This translates into lowering the amount of time drive requests effect the overall performance of the realtime playback along with how fast files are written. Since codecs have different data rate requirements often times SSD drives are cheaper options to handle data rates that normally require significant raid setups that are expensive. SSD drives also handle far more requests simultaneously which translates to putting more operations on a single disc. This often translates into better performance with more complex timelines or compositions.
    The comments regarding GPU specifications not really having any impact are relating to AE only. This is absolutely not the case for Premiere, AME, and Speedgrade or almost any other GPU acceleration application.
    Eric
    ADK

  • Critique on a new video editing system

    Hi,
    Hi, I am about to order my new system for editing in Premiere (70%), minimal AE (5%) and some color correction (25%). Would like to hear any suggestions , advice or comments on whether this looks to be a reasonable way to spend my money when building a decent current editing system.
    Specs:
    Intel 5820K
    Asus X-99 Deluxe
    Seasonic M12II-850 Bronze PSU
    Cooler Master Stryker Cabinet
    Corsair 100i CPU cooler
    8x4GB Gskill 2400 Mhz  DDR4
    Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 512GB SSD
    512GB Samsung Pro SSD
    Asus Strix GTX 970 4GB
    2x3TB 7200 RPM Seagate Baraccuda
    Monitor 1: Dell UltraSharp 24  U2414H
    Monitor 2: Dell P2214H
    Windows 8.1 Prof
    Thanks,
    RK

    See the reply in your other thread.

  • What is the best format for a new video editing hard drive?

    Hello,
    I would like to know how to properly format a new 2 TB Hitachi hard drive that I have for my early 2008 Mac Pro that will be installed in drive slot 3. Information at the following link explains that:
    "Journaling is essential for OS disks (boot drives), but for disks used for video media, used for editing purposes, Journaling is not advised, as it can affect the speed of data being written. For video media (scratch) drives you would want to select the Mac OS Extended, no journaling."
    "Journaling only affects the speed of either writing to or modifying a file, it has no effect on the read speed of files. If you're writing a lot of data, for for a long period of time, like capturing video, the write speed of the data will slow down, as the Journaling record keeps updating it's self."
    http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/formatting_hd_macstone.html
    My question is, is this information legit and should I format my new hard drive using Mac OS Extended? I will be using it solely for the purpose of reading and writing HDV and AVCHD video files using Final Cut Pro 7.
    Thanks
    Tom

    Hi there,
    Ive always followed the idea that journalling is turned off, so I would follow the advice given and turn journalling off.
    In addition I would also make that drive "private" to spotlight so it doesn't search or catalogue there.
    If its of interest, I've always formatted my drives in the following way
    make 2 partitions,
    partition 1 - make this about 10% of the drives capacity and label DO NOT USE
    partition 2 - make this the remainder of the capacity
    the reason being (So Im told by the drive gurus) is that the first sector contains the volumes boot block - this can get corrupted/damaged so having it partitioned like this means you can erase it safely whilst keeping your media.
    Ive followed this for years and it has worked on the few occasions a drive has misbehaved.
    cheers
    Andy

  • New video editing produ

    I was very excited to see the recent release of the Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS Video Editor. Anyone aware of plans for more audio/video products? As much as I like the new device, I would really prefer an internal/external combo that would have internal connections for my other system devices such as case mounted headphone and microphone jacks and my TV tuner card audio.

    I was very excited to see the recent release of the Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS Video Editor. Anyone aware of plans for more audio/video products? As much as I like the new device, I would really prefer an internal/external combo that would have internal connections for my other system devices such as case mounted headphone and microphone jacks and my TV tuner card audio.

  • New Video Editing Laptop for CS6

    Hi there,
    Have been doing a ton of reading on different forums and everyone has come to similar conclusions that this is about as hard as it gets, but seeing as I will be moving around a lot in the next year and my organization has agreed to pay $2500ish for one here we are...
    I was hoping to get your thoughts on the configuartion below. I am not a fan of Lenovo but this what a shop I was working with reccomended. You'll notice they make a couple of modifacation from what Lenovo gives them. My other big question is about these quattro video cards. I heard they work with the mecury playback engine for amazing results, but that other graphic cards can be unlocked and work just as well. I feel that if I opened it up to other graphics cards I would have more chocies from other companies.
    Lenovo ThinkPad W530 2438 $ 1829 +
    RAM 16GB $138
    Flush Mount ExpressCard eSATA Adapter $41.99
    240GB Sandisk SSD $256
    Install  $35
    $2300 + Tax and shipping extra
    Eta on this order 1 – 2 weeks
    15.6" LED backlight 1920 x 1080 / Full HD
    Core i7-3720QM Quad Core
    Nvidia N14P-Q3 Quadro K2000m
    500GB / 7200RPM
    DVD RW
    Intel 6205 AGN
    WWAN Ready
    Xpress Slot, 4 in 1 Reader
    9 Cell
    Win 7 Pro 64
    3 Yr Depot
    Thanks a lot,
    Aaron

    In reply to the question about the Quadro GPU in comparrison to other nVidia cards. A useful table available on the nVidia website shows the specs of Quadro Mobile cards. If you compare the K2000M specs with the specs of the GTX660M, which is a mid to high end Kepler GTX card you will notice they are very similar except the 660M uses faster DDR5 memory and has a considerably better memory transer rate (28.8GB/s as compared to 64GB/s) perhaps only thanks to the faster memory since the momory interface is 128-bit in both cases. Oh also the Quadro cards will give 10-bit output compared to the GTX's 8-bit, which is only useful if you were going to plug a 10-bit external display into the machine.
    Personally, if Lenovo had a higher end Kepler Quadro or a Kepler GTX card available I would have been more inclined towards them as a candidate for my own imminent purchase.
    Inspite of saying that, you will find the two top laptops on the PPBM5 table are infact Quadro cards (not even Keplar) and they are in a Lenovo laptop. I suspect that the 'hobbling' or de-tuning that nVidia does to the mobile cards (compare the GTX660M to the GTX660) so they will run more comfortably in a laptop is much less for Quadro compared to the GTX cards.
    I am not an expert and only reply in a sincere attempt to guide you to information available from nVidia and add my perspective. Others may like to comment...
    Goodluck
    Peter.

  • Using a LCD as a editing monitor?

    I want to connect an LCD TV to my Macpro and have it display the canvas full screen. I understand that the image being displayed through FCP is low resolution, what I am trying to figure out is if I can use the LCD instead of an expensive monitor. What is the difference between connecting a LCD and using it as a monitor and buying a dedicated video editing monitor?
    Thanks!

    Rick - If you want to go the BlackMagic way (their cheaper non-pro $250 card will do), you can get a computer monitor that also has HDMI.
    This has the advantage of using the monitor also as a 2nd screen for other programs (use the HDMI for FCP/Motion, use DVI for Logic, etc.).
    The only issue (besides color quality and ability to calibrate) is that many monitors don't display all the pixels - and if you're using this for editing, you want to see them all.
    After buying and returning MANY monitors from Dell and Samsung, I finally found one that displays all the pixels - a Samsung 2493HM, very inexpensive.
    Only problem is that it stretches them to fit the screen - so the aspect ratio doesn't look quite right.
    Oh, one other thing. I'm always at 1920 x 1080 for my projects. If you wanted another resolution to display on the monitor, the HDMI would probably show it, but it wouldn't be what you'd expect.

  • Video Editing in a Business Environment

    Hi all,
    We are about to put together a video editing workstation in a business environment.
    First, we wanted to go for Mac, but this is an IT no-go.
    We are not editing professionals, our purpose is to edit business videos in reasonable speed with easy software.
    We have an AVCHD Camera from Canon which can shoot full HD, even though we might stick to a lower resolution.
    Software wise we have Premiere Pro CS4 (no upgrade to CS5 in sight) and will most likely replace it with Premiere Elements 9, because feature-wise its enough for what we need it and its easier to use for now.
    Hardware wise, our business IT proposes one of the following options:
    1. Dell Precision T3500 V2
    Chassis: Dell Precision T3500
    Processor: One Intel Xenon W3503 (2.4GHz 4.8GT/s, 4MB,DC)
    Memory: 4GB (2x2048 MB) 1333MHz DDR3 ECC-UDIMM
    Fixed Disk: 250GB (15,000rmp) SAS Hard Drive
    Graphics Card: 512MB nVidia Quadro FX580 Graphics Card
    Controller Card: SAS 6i/R controller card
    CD-Rom Drive: 16x DVD+/- RW Drive
    2. Chassis: Dell Precision T5500
    Processor: One Intel Xeon E5506 (2.13GHz, 4.8GT/ s,4MB)
    Memory: 4GB (1x2048 + 2x1024) 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC
    Fixed Disk: 300GB (15,000rpm) SAS Hard Drive
    Graphics Card: 768MB nVidia Quadro FX1800 Graphics Card
    CD-Rom Drive: 16x DVD +/- RW Drive
    3. Chassis: Dell Precision T5500
    Processor: One Intel X5550 (2.6GHz, 6.4 GT/s, 8MB, QC) Memory runs at 1333 MHz
    Memory: 4GB (1x2 GB + 2x1GB) 1066MHz DDR3 ECC-UDIMM
    Fixed Disk: 300GB (15,000rpm) SAS Hard Drive
    Graphics Card: 1.5GB Quadro NIVIDIA Fx4800-2DP, 1 DVI (1DP- DVI, 1DVI- VGA Adapter) (HEGA16)
    Controller Card:  SAS 6i/R controller card
    CD-Rom Drive: 16x DVD- ROM Laufwerk
    4. Monitors
    TFT 17" Dell 17" E170S 1280 x 1024 bei 60 Hz
    TFT 19" Dell 19" E190S 1280 x 1024 bei 60 Hz
    TFT 20" Dell 20" 2007 FP 1600 x 1200 bei 60 Hz
    TFT 22" Dell 22" E2210 1680 x 1050 bei 60 Hz
    TFT 24" Dell 24" P2411H  1920 x 1080 bei 60 Hz
    My questions are:
    1. It seems clear to me, that from the above, Nr.3 T5500 should be selected, but maybe its overkill for Premiere Elements and its costly. What would you select?
    2. What are the bottlenecks/shortcomings of the system you selected under question 1, beside the harddrive?
    3. Whats, in your opinion, is the minimum requirement for a video editing Monitor?
    4. If we just look at graphics performance and think about the price, could there be an alternative configuration like: Nr.2 plus a complete different graphics card?
    5. Does the change to Premiere Elements have a big impact on graphics performance (same graphics card, different performance between Elements & Pro)?
    6. Is there a list with compatible graphics cards that is available for Premiere Elements? (I just know the one for Premiere Pro)
    Thanks a lot
    manumanu

    Welcome to the forums!  My suggestion is start and do extensive reading this forum.  Most of your questions have been discussed and answered. You are fortunate that your IT people have made you look at PC's as currently they outperform similar configured Mac's and cost you much less.
    Stay away from single Xeon processor systems.  There is no advantage to a single Xeon processor over a single i7-9xx processor
    If you want some real quick configuration performance information take a look at our PPBM5 Benchmark data.
    If you have to go Dell plan on enhancing it with much lower cost add on's like disk drives and memory
    If you want the best bang for the buck with a real system designed specifically for video editing look at ADK  
    If you really want to edit you need 6 times your 4 GB configurations.
    Stay away from the Quadro cards they currently do not improve the performance and they cost a lot.
    SAS drives are good performers but are not ideal it is better to spend your money with 2 to 3 times more disk drives than a few expensive drives.

  • Thinking to buy a new 15inch macbook pro retina display. Aim to use it for video editing and compositing... Is ıt worth for it?

    Hi... I am a freelance filmmaker. Now I have 2008 model mac pro and I am thinking to buy a new macbook pro 15 inch retina display. Do you think its worth for it? I aim to use the macbook mainly for video editing, video compositing (after effects) and photo editing. My current old mac pro has 12 GB and the graphics card is ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256 MB (Yes I still use it). My main question is, do you think its better to move to macbook pro or upgrading the old one? Making it 32 GB of RAM and buy a new NVIDIA cuda capable graphic card? I dont have enough budget to make it together... Want to hear your suggestions...

    I'm not sure, I've seen pro animators use MBPs but usually with a large monitor. Especially doing video editing, compositing and editing it might make more sense to upgrade the Mac Pro to an SSD as the boot drive. What kind of CPU setup is in your Pro?
    Check these out:
    mac pro SSD upgrades?
    SSD as system disk while users folder + data on HDD
    Early 2008 8-Core Mac Pro GPU Upgrades
    I deal exclusively with OWC. I'd call them and walk them through your system and see what they say.
    What you do takes a lot of CPU, RAM, graphics and boot disk power.
    I've upgraded my two computers to SSDs and the first thing I noticed was that Photoshop CS6 opens in 7 seconds vrs. 50 seconds when the application was on a HDD.

  • Best Monitors for video editing??? NEC LCD2690WUXi² Vs 24"Apple GLOSSY LED

    I am so stuck finding the right monitor for video editing in my price range i just cant afford the 30" apple cinema display, what is next best solution out there...?
    Is Anyone using the NEC LCD2690WUXi² Monitors? from what i can tell they are better than the 24" apple LED displays for video editing as...
    a) anti glare screen & can be properly colour calibrated
    b) 26" screen Vs 24" screen size
    c) got DVI-I & DVI-D Connectors so compatible with NVIDIA GT 120 outputs (1 Mini DisplayPort and 1 dual-link DVI-D)
    i would love the 30" apple but the NEC comes in at 1/2 the price so i can eventually buy two & i would have definitely taken the 24" but its just not suitable for professional video editing from everything I've read - mainly due to glossy screen, colours & calibration
    pls can anyone help with any display solutions/setups
    warmest regards
    graeme
    Oh PS do the NEC LCD2690WUXi² work flawlessly with the latest "Nehalem" Mac Pros?

    Not sure if that model number is here or not, but these are supposed to be very good for color work, though I do know that my old shops are still using their CRT's.
    http://www.necdisplay.com/Products/Series/?series=171d9fbb-281e-44d8-be67-14d146 e8ada0
    Third party monitors are having some trouble with the new Macs. Mostly because of the mini-display ports on the newest Apple supplied cards, but there seem to be other issues as well. You can definitely expect to use the DVI port and leave the mini display for whatever Apple will force on us next.
    Apples 24"? Well, it works fine for most but in Apples own description of the display it was made to connect laptops to.
    Edit: I'm sorry, for video work? Most anything in the upper end is fine.
    Message was edited by: Samsara

  • Best monitor for video editing?

    Hi,
    I have been saving up for a Mac for sometime now and have decided to buy the new Mac Pro when it comes out this December.
    I understand that it doesn't come with a monitor so I have been looking into which one would be best to get. I have never had to buy a separate monitor before as I have always had an iMac so maybe there is one that is very popular that most people use that I don't know about. It would mostly be used for video editing on Final Cut and a little bit of Motion and then other general things like music, photos, documents etc.
    Ideally 24" or 27" and under £400.

    I don't want 2 monitors, so a single 27inch model just what I need... plenty of room for PPro, or I can have a Word document and a Text file open and side by side
    John,
    That is personal taste and there is no discussing taste. However, from my perspective, and that is personal, I prefer 3840 x 1080 resolution with dual monitors over 1920 x 1080 with a single monitor, but that is because I very often have Firefox, Filezilla, Dreamweaver and some other applications open at the same time, switching between the Adobe forums, Gmail accounts, Notebook results from the PPBM5 data submissions, PPBM5 form submissions, MySQL access, phpadmin pages to update the database, the PPBM5 results pages and various DW .php pages for the maintenance of our database and switching back and forth between various versions of PR. I occasionally really run out of real estate with all these applications and could not consider a single monitor with only 1920 x 1080 resolution, even if it were a 105" screen. In the future I would even like to have a four monitor setup (with MPE hardware support) in a two by two configuration, so that I can freely move my application screens around.
    If that happens, notice I say if and not when, my preference for a monitor would be something like 4 Samsung F2380 monitors. Small bezel, great display and panel, affordable.

  • Video editing: glossy or matte monitor

    hello friends,
    i am about to buy a new monitor for myself but am not able to make a decision. should i go for glossy monitor or matte monitor. i find colors on glossy monitor very sharp and vivid.
    i am planning to go for hp 2009f model which is 20". it is a glossy monitor.
    i wanted to know which one shud i go for.
    my main work wud be video editing and animation. is there anyone around who is using lcd monitor for video editing and animation?
    kindly englighten.
    regards

    Hi Catch,
    You are in a catch 22 situation.
    First of all, 20" is about minimum dimensions for a single display. Second, HP is pretty expensive for what they offer. I have a notebook with a 16.4" glossy screen and my personal feeling is it shows much more vivid colors than a matte screen. OK for office applications, but not for editing. I also have two 20" monitors for my video machine, which are matte. I do recognize that the colors are not as vibrant as on a glossy screen, but much more natural. Neither are suitable for color correction, so it boils down to personal taste. For color correction you need a properly calibrated CRT monitor or a high end LCD ($ 4K+) monitor.

  • Glitchy video on CS5 - new to editing

    I imported video off my camera into Adobe Premiere Pro CS5. I am fairly new to editing with this system and have very little knowledge of how it works. I have been working my way through the tutorials, but cannot seem to figure out this latest problem.
    The video that I import into Adobe and put into my timeline seems fuzzy and glitchy. It isn't freezing, but it has an immense amount of grain and "flickers", for lack of a better word. At first I noticed that my sequence and footage had different pixel aspect ratios and frame rates, which I corrected. The problem still persists however.
    There's a possibility - as I'm an amateur in both filmmaking and editing - that this is a problem with the footage itself or how I particularly shot it. However, I've never had this problem before when using cheaper DV cameras and it strikes me as odd that I would get worse footage out of my new HD camera unless I did do something wrong. However, I can't seem to figure out what would cause this within Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 either.
    Any help is greatly appreciated,
    Thanks.

    Doug,
    Welcome to the forum.
    First, check the playback modes and settings in the Program Monitor. It is likely that one of those is off, such as the Quality setting, or the display mode, say 1/2, 1/4, etc..
    If there is nothing there, then more info will be necessary. This ARTICLE will tell you what will be needed, and how to gather some of it. The system info, the Project Preset chosen, and the source footage will be important.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to delete the document at the exit event of last step in workflow

    I want  to delete the content at the exit of last step. Tried two codes: 1.<$executeService("DELETE_DOC")$> 2.<$executeService("DELETE_REV")$> But is not working. plz guide. Thanks.

  • Can I validate an XML file using an external DTD

    Hi, I'm trying to use an external DTD to validate an XML file (which does not refer to this DTD). The java docs that ship with the XML parser aren't clear on how exactly to do this (or whether it can be done). I'd appreciate any advice on how I shoul

  • Annoying Safari problem after Mountain Lion update...

    I've updated my Macbook Pro to Mountain Lion OS X a while ago and now use Safari 6.0 as my main browser. The zoom button (green button with the plus sign) on the top left corner doesn't seem to be working properly, though. Everytime I click on it, th

  • Using N73 as modem via infrared

    Hi, I'am trying to set-up a configuration to use my N73 as modem via infrared (iRDA). I followed the instruction provided with PC Suite but it didn't worked. One thing is that the "N73 iRDA modem" choice doesn't appear in the modem list (I can see N7

  • Is AI CC worth it?

    I'm taking a look at AI CC. Some of the new features are cool, but I can do without them. What I was hoping to see were some refinements to the interface such as I have learned to appreciate in Photoshop. To name a few: Drag-Zoom feature "Scrub" pref