NEWPTRs, NSEs and PSEs at same rate

Some of our 7200 VXR routers, connected to the same type of SDH-ADMs by OC3 POS-adapters, continously count NEWPTR events at (almost) the same rate as NSEs and PSEs:
sh contr pos4/0
POS4/0
SECTION
LOF = 0 LOS = 0 BIP(B1) = 0
LINE
AIS = 0 RDI = 0 FEBE = 0 BIP(B2) = 0
PATH
AIS = 0 RDI = 0 FEBE = 0 BIP(B3) = 0
PLM = 0 UNEQ = 0
LOP = 0 NEWPTR = 23643175 PSE = 23643174 NSE = 23643175
Does anyone know what could cause this?
My assumption is that these routers see concatenation indicators - although i don't know where they come from.
The only explanation i have is that they are generated in our providers SDH/Sonet ring (by concatenting VCs for diagnosis purposes etc.).
Is there a possibility to get a dump of a SDH frame from the router CLI in order to inspect the overheads?

NSE/PSE (Negative/Positive Stuff Events) indicate that at some point along
the path, the payload on the STS3c was shifted to adjust for a timing
differences on the lower speed (OC-3) tributary and the higher-speed
(OC12-192) path. A NSE occurs when the incoming bitrate on the tributary is
too high for the read clock (the clock that reads data from an inbound
tributary to place the bitstream on the higher speed path) to process the
previous byte before the write clock fills the write buffer with the inbound
stream. Thus, it stuffs last byte received into a reserved position in the
LOH for negative stuffs, and adjusts the pointer values to reflect the the
change in position of the beginning of the SPE. The opposite is true if the
data is coming in to slow. It inserts dummy bits into the higher stream to
account for the "missing" bits because the inbound stream was too slow. To
summarize:
1) The LOH for each STS-3c contains two bytes (H1 & H2) that define the
location of the beginning of the SPE (the payload and the path overhead).
The first 4 bits in H1 are the New Data Flag bits and are used to detect a
malformed pointer value or an invalid pointer operation. Bits 5 and 6 are
reserved and set to 0. Bits 7-15 define the pointer value, which is any
number between 0 and 782. Note that the for concatenated signals, the
pointer vlaue is multiplied by the number of STS-1s concatenated (IE STS-3c,
12c, 48c, 192c, etc). This allows for 10 bit pointer values to be able to
address thousands of byte positions in the SONET frame. Finally, 5 bits of
the 10 are defined as decrement bits, and 5 as increment bits, in an
alternating fashion as such:
IDIDIDIDID
Under nominal operation, the payload (SPE) is somewhere offset from the
end of the LOH. The number of bytes offset from the H3 byte is the pointer
value.
If the incoming rate is too slow, n dummy bytes must be stuffed into the
STS-3n. In your case, it is an STS-3c and thus, three dummy bytes are
stuffed following the last of the three H3 bytes in the LOH. Remember,
STS-3c operates just like STS1 except times everything by three. As such,
the LTE inverts the I bits from their previous value to indicate a positive
stuff shall occur in the next frame. Then, the new pointer value is sent,
incremented by one. No change in this value can occur for the next three
frame. Any such change is regarded as a pointer violation and an LOP
condition is set.
If the rate comes in to the multiplexing equipment too fast, 3 bytes from
the STS-3c must be stuffed into the three H3 bytes in the LOH, and the
pointer value must be decremented by one. But first, the D bits are
inverted to indicate a negative stuff event is occurring. Then, the pointer
is adjusted, the D bits inverted back (inversion meands flip from 0 to 1 and
vice versa), and the pointer vlaue is decremented. Again, no change may
occur for three consecutive frames.
Finally, if there is any reason for the pointer value to change other
than for positive or negative stuff, the new pointer must be sent with the
NDF bits set to 1001. Again, this value cannot change for three consecutive
frames.
What you are seeing is a timing problem. If the routers are back-to-back,
set the clock source to internal on both of them. This sounds odd, but
there is a problem in the POS chipsets on PA-POS-OC3 cards such that this is
the only stable method. If they are through and ADM, check that your
carrier has the circuit optioned properly

Similar Messages

  • Can you run PSE 8 and PSE 12 (with premiere elements 12) on same computer?

    Can you have both programs, PSE 8 and PSE 12 (and premiere elements 12) on the same computer without compatibility issues?

    Yes.

  • HT6050 After upgrading my ipad to ios7, its battery is getting charged way too fast and it drains at the same rate. I have been waiting for a new software update,to fix this, and nothing yet.....

    After upgrading my ipad to ios7, its battery is getting charged way too fast and it drains at the same rate. I have been waiting for a new software update,to fix this, and nothing yet.....

    Make an appointment at an Apple Store to have your device examined by a technician. Or contact Apple Support.

  • Multiple versions of PSE on same computer.

    Can multiple versions of PSE be installed and used on one computer, e.g. PSE5, PSE8, PSE11, and PSE 13.  Will there be conflict or other kinds of problems?  Are the different versions in any way connected or are they each entirely stand alone with "touching" each other?  Or, another way of putting this is, do I have to uninstall prior versions of PSE before installing a newer version on the same computer?  Thanks for any advice you can offer.

    rgthoman a écrit:
    Is this true of the organizer as well as the editor?  If files are stored in the organizer of one version, are they readily accessible for editing in another version?
    That has nothing to do with several versions. Files are NOT stored in the organizer. They are somewhere on your drive(s). If you have a single Elements version and several catalogs pointing to the same files on your drive(s), each catalog will be able to access the same files... until you move, rename or delete them from another catalog.

  • Okay so i had an iphone 5.  I backed it up on icloud. Then i got the new iphone 5s i restored ot from icloud from my previous iphone 5.  Now everything works find execept now the games are slowy and drops the frame rate and look choppy. Please help.

    Okay so i had an iphone 5.  I backed it up on icloud. Then i got the new iphone 5s i restored ot from icloud from my previous iphone 5.  Now everything works find execept now the games are slowy and drops the frame rate and look choppy. Then i restarted my iphone 5s as a new device downloaded the same apps even the ones optimized for ios 7 and the games still lag. And i just got my iphone 5s replace.  The funny thing is.  While im playing games and their running choppy and slow and if i take a snap shot inside the phone. They run smooth and HD but just for a few seconds and boom they go back to slow and choppy.  Is it the ios 7 or the iphone 5s it self? Like i said this is my replacement iphone 5s because the other 5s did the same thing. And it was running slowly.

    As far as I know you can't delete the primary email address for an iCloud account.  It's assigned when the account is created.  But your neighbor wouldn't have been able to get into your iCloud account without your Apple ID and password.  Are you sure the account wasn't still on your phone when you gave it to him?
    You could migrate a copy of your data to a new iCloud account but I would still be concerned that someone else was using my old account, which presumably still has your data in it.
    I'm fairly certain that you're going to have to have iCloud support help you sort this one out as they may have the ability to make changes to an existing account that users can't.  Make an appointment with the genius bar at a nearby Apple store and have them take a look at it.  If necessary, they should be able to contact iCloud support for you.

  • Hi - for any photo, info in mountain lion shows a different file size than Photoshop does. I've tested with CS3 and CS6 and get the same problem. Doesn't happen with CS3 and OSX10.4 or any previous versions of Photoshop and OSX. Anyone know why?

    Hi - for any photo, info in mountain lion shows a different file size than Photoshop does. I've tested with both CS3 and CS6 on 10.8.2 and get the same problem. This doesn't happen with CS3 and OSX10.4 or any previous versions of Photoshop and OSX. Anyone know why?

    this one is actually a really rare symptom of a flaky connection to the ipod on a Windows PC. there's more going on in terms of hardware on nanos and 5th gens than in the earlier models ... so if the connection is flaky to precisely the right/wrong degree, itunes will see the ipod, but misidentify it as an earlier version of ipod.
    tracking down the cause of the flakiness can be tricky ... as you already know ...
    just checking. have you tried connecting with a different (known-good) USB cable? does that seem to have any impact on the rate of occurence of the problem?

  • I edited a .nef file in Camera Raw and PSE 11 saved it as a .xmp file.  I cannot open it now.

    I edited a .nef file in Camera Raw and PSE 11 saved it as a .xmp file.  I cannot open it now.
    I am not sure if this is an issue but Windows does not recognize the .xmp file and give it an icon with the photo's picture.  On a related note, when I edited some .nef files and Windows saved it as .dng file, it too, like the .xmp file, Windows does not recognize the .dng file and give it an icon with the photo's picture.
    Do I need to download something to create this icon?

    PSE didn't save your file as an .xmp file. The .xmp file is not the image--that's still the .nef. The xmp file is what adobe calls a 'sidecar' file, just a record of the settings you used in the raw converter. As long as it's in the same place as the image, when you open the nef in ACR again, it will open where you left off, with the settings you chose.
    If you want to save as, you have two choices:
    1. Click the Open button in the raw converter window and save in the image format of your choice.
    2. Use the Save button in the raw converter to create a separate DNG file, which still must be opened in the raw converter and converted to an image format for use in other programs.

  • Clients Connect to N AP's on 5508 and get different Transfer rates than on 4404

    I have have 2x 4404's (2x) and 2x 5508's all are running 7.0.240.0. When I take an 1142 and associate it to a 4404 I can connect a test client using N at 144Mbps and I can get transfer rates averaging 70Mbps (using iperf tests). When I take the same AP and associate it to a 5508, (same SSID, etc) I connect at 144Mbps but only get average 6Mbps transfer rates. I get the same results with 1252's. I get the same results if I wipe the config on the 5508 and start from scratch. It only happens when connecting at a/n, when I use a b/g AP such as 1132 I connect at 54Mbps on either controller and get transfer rates of 24Mbps. I have enabled disabled LAG (rebooted), moved the 5508 to connect to the same swtich ports, swapped GBICs. The issue happens on both 5508s, TAC has been unable to resolve this and they are confused as well.
    Some of the other things I have tried:
    •-          You are facing the issue on 5508's WLC only.
    •-          Both the WLC and the client reports high connection speed “144Mbps”
    •-          iPerf between wireless and wired showed the following:
    on 4400:  [124]  0.0-16.9 sec   154 MBytes  76.5 Mbits/sec
    On 5500:  [124]  0.0-94.3 sec  70.2 MBytes  6.25 Mbits/sec
    •-          The AP is the same AP, you just bounce it from 1 WLC to another.
    •-          The location of the AP is the same in all the tests, but it can be replicated with an 1142 anywhere on site and get the same results.
    •-          The test PC is the same in both cases
    •-          The configuration is the same on both WLC’s confirmed visaully in GUI and via CLI outputs and compaired.
    •-          The switch is the same, but have tired swapping 4404 and 5508 in data center.
    •-          Tried to swap the GBICs.
    •-          Used different ports on the 5508 (not just diff GBICs)
    •-          Disabled the LAG to rule out the load balancing algorithm.
    •-       Replaced the patch cables
    Used same ip space that the 4404 is using without sucess.
    Upgraded my second 5508 to version 7.5 and exact same resutls.
    Any ideas?

    Hi 
    In my 5508 WLC i have exactly the same problem as you  gsutherland 
    I tried apply this command config 802.11b 11nSupport a-mpdu tx priority all disable
    and i get message 
    "802.11b network not disabled"
    Why i must turn off b standard ?
    Thanks for respons 

  • Best way to create slide shows in PE4 and PSE 6

    What's the best way to create a fancy slide show in PE 4 and PSE 6? I need to create a slide show of about 600 pictures. I'm on Windows XP with 3gb RAM. I've done this a few years ago in earlier versions of PE and PSE. Before i plunge into this again i wanted to get some overall guidance for what to do or not do.
    My ultimate goal is to create a slide show that:
    1. uses pan and zoom on every photo
    2. transitions between every photo
    3. has an audio track
    4. has some nice special effects -- words and graphics that appear on slide at precisely the right moment to match the song, and stay on the screen as one slide transitions to another. i want the text to be able to move and fade in and out.
    My view is that it's easy to accomplish #1-3 in PSE 6; it's quite simple to create a slide show, add pan and zoom, and transitions. However, #4 is not doable because adding text and graphics can only be done on a slide at a time and only when the slide start/stops (i.e., you can't have text appear 2 secs after the slide has started displaying and stay on screen while the next slide appears). Need PE 4 to do that.
    What i'm wondering is:
    -- is it best to create the basic slide show in PSE6 and then export to PE 4 to do the final fancy stuff, or is it best to just create the show in PE4? Seems that doing the pans, zooms, and transitions are easiest in PSE 6.

    eric,
    I am going to offer some reasons NOT to start this slide show in Photoshop Elements. This is despite the fact that I have used the workflow of starting in Photoshop Elements and used the Send Slideshow to Premiere Elements in PSE5 - PE 3 and PSE7 - PE7.
    1- Timing differences between the PSE and PE slide show construction and processing
    There are many differences in timing between the two products. Transitions can start/end slightly offset from their timing in PSE once they arrive and are processed in PE. Same for pan and zoom. Does this matter? Well the more precise your timing, the more potential for a show stopper.
    Example: one person who wanted continual motion using pan and zoom needed to go modify the transition positioning and the keyframing of the pan/zooms on every single slide after sending a slideshow from PSE to PRE.
    2- your requirement to
    "words and graphics that appear on slide at precisely the right moment to match the song, and stay on the screen as one slide transitions to another. i want the text to be able to move and fade in and out."
    You can't really sync the audio to a slide in PSE. The text can't move or fade in/out. I think that it will be more grief to retrofit these functions to a slide show that was created in PSE than it will be to do the all the work in Premiere Elements.
    3- "Add the sound track for the ENTIRE slide show (this will be longer than i currently have slides for because i don't have all the photos"
    I am suspicious that adding the ENTIRE sound track in one PSE slide show will not work.
    I have done multiple sends from PSE slide show editor to Premiere Elements. However, I decided on the approach of using no audio in the PSE slideshow editor and adding Audio in Premiere Elements AFTER sending all the slide shows.
    Again, your objective of syncing specific photos to music points is good artistically - but I am concerned that it will make your PSE to PRE workflow problematic.
    4- "as new photos arrive, do the arrangement/pans/zooms in PSE and move them to PE"
    As Steve mentioned when you do subsequent sends of the slideshow, it appends to the end - does not seem to fit your objective of replacing part of the middle.
    Also if you get new photos in for the second section of the slideshow - but over in Premiere Elements you had already made other changes in the second section. There is no function to combine new changes doen in PSE and changes done in PE for that same "section" of the slideshow.
    5- you did not say whether you will be outputting this slide show in Full Screen or Widescreen format. Will you be burning a DVD? If you will be doing widescreen output, additional problems with specifying pan/zoom in PSE have been identified on various forums because the PSE pan/zoom boxes are not widescreen aspect ratio.
    Conclusion:
    Some of my comments here are definitely subjective - however, it is my overall conclusion that your objectives and work plan are not a good fit for the Photoshop Elements slide show editor to Premiere Elements workflow.
    My perspective on the Photoshop Elements slide show editor is that it is designed to simple, quick and easy. Therefore it has limitations.

  • NIKON D5000 NEF - Lightroom 2.6 and PSE show colors quite differently from what Nikon Software show

    With my Nikon D5000 DSLR camera, I took recently photos from small blue flowers. I had set-up my Nikon D5000 to create for every photo both a NEF File and a JPEG File (and had set my camera to use Automatic While Balance). 
    I noticed that for NEF Files Lightroom 2.6 (and also PSE 7, that uses internally Camera RAW ) shows me the blue colors of the flowers quite differently from what I see with PSE for the jpeg file. It is my impression, that it is in the Jpeg files, that the blue color is close to the reality; and  that it is with the NEF Files that Lightroom and PSE show a blue color that is quite different from the reality.
    I also looked at the photo files with the NIKON "View Nx" 1.3.0 Software that came with my camera. With "View Nx" the blue colors (both with the NEF file and the Jpeg File) are very vlose that what i see with PSE 7 in the jpeg file (and quite different from what I see with LR and PSE for the .NEF File).
    I mentioned this problem to Nikon Support. They suggested, that Nikon Software and Adobe software use different algorithms; and that the Nikon algorithms are better/closer adapted to the Nikon cameras than the more generalized Adobe algorithms that need to support a very large number of cameras.
    But ....it is Lightroom that i wish to use to process my NEF Files and PSE that I wish to use to organize my Photos. Can a LR/Camera-RAW expert help me? I would like to find a solution to see with LR and with PSE in my D5000 NEF Photo Files blue colors that are close to the reality and close to what Nikon Software shows me on my PC. Please notice that I am very far away from being a professional and that i will probably not understand complicated explanations.
    Thanks a lot in advance.
    An additional note, that is perhaps not relevant: I used LR to convert my NEF File into a JPEG File format and looked at the blue in the result. It looks the same as what LR and PSE show me for the .NEF File (and looks different from the jpeg file crreated by the NIKON camera).

    EJ and Jim
    Thank You very much for your useful feedback.
    I realize, that as a neophit I am an exot among the community of photo-experts and photo-professionals addressed by LR.  Therefore the wish that I will now express is perhaps inadequate. But since it is gently, that i express this wish, I am probably allowed to do so......
    My wish for a future version of LR, is that LR comes out of the box with a "reasonable" interpretation of the RAW images of most important/widespread modern cameras....without requiring that non-experts like me gets confronted from the very beginning with the need to develop their own default settings.
    For this wish, I will formulate a Feature Request.
    You might wonder, why a non-expert like me is interested in LR instead of  using those Photo-Editing Software (e.g. PSE) that are supposed to address the need of non-experts. Well..... I am coming from the PSE world. I am reasolnably happy with the PSE Organizer....but  I hate the complex, inefficient, unfriendli "user-interface" (experts will probably tell: workflow-interface?) of the PSE Editor. Its really a last-century Software. LR is so much more friendly, even for non-experts...within the Library Module, i do not need to switch back and forth between one dialogue-window for each type of change.... nearly all what i need is in that one right-hand pane of the Library module.
    I honestly believe, that Adobe should take a serious look at promoting/marketing  LR also to the audience of non-experts. That would be a good and attractive additional marketing opportunity for LR.

  • Camera Raw Versions and PSE Versions

    On my Windows 7 PC, I have installed (and have a license for) among other both PSE V10 and PSE V12.  On my PC, when editing a Nikon NEF File, PSE V10 uses Camera Raw 6.4.1 and PSE V12 uses Camera Raw 8.2.
    Since on my C Disk I see only one copy of a Folder named "NIKON D5000" (this folder is in C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\Camera Profiles\Camera ), I have the impression that both the versions 6.4.1 and the Version 8.2 of Camera RAW share the identical Camera Profiles.   Is that impression/guess correct?
    Question 1: Can I conclude, that (since both Camera Raw Version share the same Camera Profile folders), if I will buy a Nikon D5300 (which officially gets supported only by Camera Raw 8.n (n being probably equal or higher than 3)), that once  Camera Raw 8.n (n=> 3) will be installed on my PC (because this will be the Camera Raw Version supported/used by PSE V12), I will  be able to process my future D5300 Nef Files both with the combination of PSE V10 and Camera Raw 6.4.1 and the combination of PSE V12 and Camera Raw 8.n (even though officially, Camera RAW 6.4.1 does not support the D5300)? Thank You very much in advance for your answer.
    Question 2: Can somebody point me to a downloadable  NEF file shot by the Nikon D7100?
    I will then download that NEF file and see whether I can process it with the combination of PSE V10 and Camera Raw 6.4.1. This will allow me to verify the answer to question 1. Thank You very much in advance for your answer

    Since I am probably not the only one on these forums who do not understand well (or who is/was not even aware of) the Adobe DNG converter,  I would like to add the following:
    Yes, 99jon is totally correct: a NEF File from the Nikon D7100 will not open with PSE V10 and with ACR6.4.
    ...But: a couple of days ago, I realized that I could use the latest versions of the free downloadable Adobe DNG Converter (which supports among other Nikon D7100 NEF and the RAW Files of most modern cameras) to convert the D7100 .NEF files into DNG Files. To perform such a conversion, I started the DNG Converter, identified the windows folder containg the NIKON D7100 NEF Files, provided a couple of options and then let the DNG Converter convert the NIKON D7100  NEF Files into .dng files.
    Once done, I imported the .dng files into PSE V10,...and could edit them without problems with the combination of PSE V10 and ACR 6.4. Even if I am not a specialist and might be wrong: I did not came across any limitation for the ACR editing of the NIKON D7100 .dng files that was problematic for my purposes (ACR even supported multiple "Camera Profiles" for the D7100!). I am more than happy!
    To summarize: if making a small détour via the DNG Converter,  it becomes possible to edit with the combination of old PSE Versions and old ACR Versions the "DNG versions" of RAW Files shot with new cameras (like for example the NIKON D7100)..

  • Sharing keywords between LR and PSE 9 Organiser? :-(

    OK, I've owned 3 photo products from Adobe (Photoshop Album, Lightroom and Photoshop Essentials) and have 3 keyword file formats! I use LR as my main photo organiser and have started using PSE and its Organiser but am frustrated by the lack of coherent design of keyword files. I have hundreds of keywords in LR. I had to write some Python code to convert my "Album" keywords to the LR format and it seems I have to do the same to get keywords from LR into PSE's organiser. But there's now a new problem...
    Unfortunately when I import keywords into PSE's Organiser any duplication of existing keywords results in duplication in the keyword list - i.e. when I add "From file.." PSE adds to the list rather than merging! PSE is clearly not designed to re-load keywords from file any extend the keywords. If I export all my keywords and re-import them I don't expect the number of keywords to double! Oh - I can;t delete keywords before importing because I'm told everything it's 'learned' (people etc. will be lost).  Keywords appear to be exportable but not importable.
    I clearly cannot import keywords into PSE's organiser as I can with LR.
    Is anyone sharing keywords between LR and PSE's Organiser?

    Thanks, I can see how that can work and the problems. It looks like the keywords themselves cannot be easily shared and I agree that having two organising programs is problematic but I wanted to 'export' the keywords I have created including their structure from Lightroom and import them into PSE organiser. You'd think you could do this with two similar products from the same company. The organisers in question are used for two purposes and the photos in each are different - i.e. I use lightroom for my pro stuff and PSE for family/casual stuff and no photo would be present in both. It looks like PSE really isn't designed to import keywords. I have Python code to create a PSE keyword file from a lightroom file so that will have to do as it's clear there's no interoperability.
    Thanks for your suggestions.

  • I just upgraded my data plan from 6GB to 10GB for the same rate of $80 is this a promotion? If yes, when does the promotion end? Thank you.

    I just upgraded my data plan from 6GB to 10GB for the same rate of $80 per month. Is this a promotion? If yes, when does the promotion end?

    In most cases you keep the same plan and promotions even when you upgrade the phone.  There are exceptions for very old plans and unlimited data, but essentially mrhelper is correct. You have option to "keep current plan" when upgrading.  so in most cases, your statement that you will go back to $100 for 10 GB when upgrading is incorrect.  What was your particular circumstance?

  • Have old MacBook Pro running tiger 10.4 want to save date to external hard drive and buy newer MacBook and still use same drive. Any suggestions, most  WD drives say nothing about os tiger 10.4.

    Have old MacBook Pro running tiger 10.4 want to save date to external hard drive and buy newer MacBook and still use same drive. Any suggestions, most  WD drives say nothing about os tiger 10.4. The OS compatibility  is much newer on the data.  Totally confused. Not a computer person.

    I haven't checked reviews recently but there's a difference between bare drives and drives with enclosures.  Western Digital made some of the most reliable drives last time I checked, though the enclosures weren't all that great.  It is convenient to get both in one package but I usually buy a highly rated enclosure and then put a highly rated drive in it myself.  OWC sells some good enclosures but if they put a so-so drive inside of it then the package is only as good as its weakest component.  If you get a package from them, ask them what drive is inside (some vendors have no idea what's inside  -  went to an Apple Store recently and they couldn't tell me what was inside some of their Apple brand enclosures).  My first thought if buying a new drive would be to buy a OWC enclosure with a WD drive, but chek around because I may be out of date.
    10 years ago Seagate was one of the best drives. Now they rate poorly in reviews.

  • NVidia GT 120 and intermittent low frame-rate with Expose, Dashboard...

    I have an iMac early 2009 with a NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 (256 Mo) graphic card.
    I have intermittent low frame-rate problems with Expose, Dasboard and several other large animations...
    For example, when I trigger Expose or Dashboard, the animation may sometimes be choppy (with few intermediate images) to very choppy (practically no intermediate images)...
    The second after, the same animation may feature a very high frame-rate...
    Neither Apple diagnostic tool nor TechTool Deluxe finds any hardware problem.

    I have the same iMac, and also have this same problem.
    When I first activate Dashboard, the animation is choppy. If I activate it several times in a row very quickly, the animation smooths out noticeably. It's as though the video card is asleep, or cycled down, and then wakes up and springs into action.
    This is testable. If I run the command line utility OpenCL Bench immediately following a restart, my iMac's GT 120 gives a time of 14 seconds. If I open iTunes, turn on the visualizer, and then run OpenCL Bench again, the GT 120 gives a time of 1.7 seconds! If I turn off the visualizer, wait a few seconds, and re-run OpenCL Bench, the GT 120's time increases to 5.6 seconds.
    The same performance increase/decrease shows up with Dashboard. If I open Dashboard with the iTunes Visualizer running, right off the bat, Dashboard's animation is very smooth. If I turn off the visualizer and wait about 30 seconds, Dashboard's animation is back to choppy.
    This is not dependent on the iTunes Visualizer. I can have the "OpenCL Procedural Grass and Terrain Example" running, for example, and get the same results from OpenCL Bench and Dashboard.

Maybe you are looking for