Nexus 5k QoS Classifcation

Hello,
From what I have gathered from documentation the Nexus is able to mark any DSCP value between 0-63. I would assume it would be able to classify based on any DSCP value as well. The documentation however leads me to believe otherwise. The language for marking suggest valid values are from 0 to 63. For classification the language suggests classification can only match standard DSCP values. I would test but do not have a Nexus at my disposal. Can someone with experience please confirm?
Classification
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/command/reference/qos/n5k-qos_cmds_m.html#wp1079436
Marking
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/command/reference/qos/n5k-qos_cmds_s.html#wp1159955
regards,
ryan

Hi Ryan,
As you can see from my 5010 lab switch:
24.09.5010B.1(config)# policy-map type qos my_policy
24.09.5010B.1(config-pmap-qos)# class type qos my_class
24.09.5010B.1(config-pmap-c-qos)# set dscp ?
<0-63>   DSCP value
af11     AF11 dscp (001010)
af12     AF12 dscp (001100)
af13     AF13 dscp (001110)
af21     AF21 dscp (010010)
af22     AF22 dscp (010100)
af23     AF23 dscp (010110)
af31     AF31 dscp (011010)
af32     AF32 dscp (011100)
af33     AF33 dscp (011110)
af41     AF41 dscp (100010)
af42     AF42 dscp (100100)
af43     AF43 dscp (100110)
cs1      CS1(precedence 1) dscp (001000)
cs2      CS2(precedence 2) dscp (010000)
cs3      CS3(precedence 3) dscp (011000)
cs4      CS4(precedence 4) dscp (100000)
cs5      CS5(precedence 5) dscp (101000)
cs6      CS6(precedence 6) dscp (110000)
cs7      CS7(precedence 7) dscp (111000)
default Default dscp (000000)
ef       EF dscp (101110)
The only DSCP values you can set are 0-63, as you suspected.
However, these are the only DSCP values you are supposed to be able to match as well:
24.09.5010B.1(config-cmap-qos)# match dscp ?
<0-63>   List of DSCP values
af11     AF11 dscp (001010)
af12     AF12 dscp (001100)
af13     AF13 dscp (001110)
af21     AF21 dscp (010010)
af22     AF22 dscp (010100)
af23     AF23 dscp (010110)
af31     AF31 dscp (011010)
af32     AF32 dscp (011100)
af33     AF33 dscp (011110)
af41     AF41 dscp (100010)
af42     AF42 dscp (100100)
af43     AF43 dscp (100110)
cs1      CS1(precedence 1) dscp (001000)
cs2      CS2(precedence 2) dscp (010000)
cs3      CS3(precedence 3) dscp (011000)
cs4      CS4(precedence 4) dscp (100000)
cs5      CS5(precedence 5) dscp (101000)
cs6      CS6(precedence 6) dscp (110000)
cs7      CS7(precedence 7) dscp (111000)
default Default dscp (000000)
ef       EF dscp (101110)
This output was taken on our latest version of code, and the 5500 series is the same.
- Amanda

Similar Messages

Nexus 5600 QoS

Hi
I want to apply QoS scheduling using 8 classes per interface in the nexus 5672
As far as I know , Nexus 5600 have 8 queues per port
So in the ingress port, I want to apply COS mark using 8 class-maps and policy-map type qos
but I don't understand why I must apply "set qos-group" in the policy-map
and then in the egress port, to schedule the bandwidth for each class-map
I applied class-map and policy-map type queueing
but in the class-map, there is only "match qos-group", qos-group has only1~5 value
so how to apply bandwidth percent for 8 each class-map in the policy-map per port?
is it impossible?
please let me know that reason and how to do that
Thank you

Duplicate posts.
Go here: http://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12142791/nexus-7000-qos

Nexus 5500 qos drop priority

Hi
If I have two COS values within the same queue on a 5500 port can I set drop priority for them ? I am looking at setting in contract and out of contract data rates for some VMs, setting the COS value dependant on this and then getting the 5K to be more likely to drop out of contact data.
Its whjat I would do on a 6k or 7k with assigning different tail drop thresholds to different COS values in the same queue.

Thats what I kind of figured after reading all the docs. Makes it a bit of a pain as there really arent quite enough queues for what I want to do.
Viideo & Voice
Call SIgnnaling
Critical Data
Network Ctrl (ssh, VMware vmotion and ctrl etc)
Bulk Data
Best Efforts
Thats six and since we are using FCoE tehre are only 5 qos groups we can use ......
I am going to have to combine two of the above.

How to change default FCoE QoS class - Nexus 5020

I see that on a Nexus 5020, the default FCoE QoS class is 50%. I am not using FCoE so I would like to adjust this value to 0%. I switch complains and says I can't change default values. How should I go about getting around this to eliminate the FCoE queue and give 100% BW to default? Thanks.

No. The default classloader is a builtin classloader in
the JRE. You can use other classloaders.
The java.net.URLClassLoader is provided in
the JDK. That's the only one. Otherwise you
should subclass ClassLoader and implement
the loadClass method (f.i.
loadClass("my.program") {
String file="my.program".replace('.','/') + ".class";
// find the file in classpath
// read the class file in a byte[]
return defineClass(byte[]);
although this is not the advised way to do it. Search the web for how to implement a classloader directly.

DCBX Between Linux and Nexus QOS

Hi Guys
i have a server with 2 physical links only.
over this link im passing 2 vlans in trunk ( can be Portchannel to VPC or bond active passive , doesnt matter to me ) .
vlan 302 is for data
vlan 303 is for backup
server on vlan 303 is pushing traffic on that link and would take as much
bandwidth as we would give it , and would therefore cause communication issues to vlan 302 . ( congestion ) .
I would like to talk about my options here , to avoid congestions .
thought about enabling dcbx on clients ( linux ) and pfc ( priority flow
control ) to be able to negotiate qos and bw allocation according to COS IEEE 802.1p .
the idea is to have either the traffic prioritized/limit/shaped before/when its ingressing the nexus port .
the dcbx looks very cool like i said , it's kind of like what the nexus has with the CNA Card .
when it can send the linux nic through dcbx the qos parameters to apply ! ( ah ok , i see now its exactly the same )
ps linux dcbx link : http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/precise/man8/dcbtool.8.html
Ingress Queuing Policies
You can associate an ingress policy map with an Ethernet interface to guarantee bandwidth for the specified traffic class or to specify a priority queue.
The ingress policy is applied in the adapter to all outgoing traffic that matches the specified CoS value.
When you configure an ingress policy for an interface, the switch sends the configuration data to the adapter. If the adapter does not support the DCBX protocol or the ingress policy type-length-value (TLV), the ingress policy configuration is ignored.
did anyone here tried it or implemented dcbx before ?
anyway id be happy to hear your wise and helpfull suggestions please
Thanks Thanks !!!

Found the answer.
Anatomy of RX packet counters on a Cisco Nexus 5548:
Nexus5548# show int eth1/29
RX
6387682660 unicast packets 1495485 multicast packets 164 broadcast packets
6389178309 input packets 589693485138 bytes
5146969 jumbo packets 0 storm suppression bytes
* "input" = unicast + multicast + broadcast (all non-jumbo)
* "jumbo" = frames sized 1519 bytes to the MTU bytes defined on the interface
* "jumbo" frames are counted separately from non-jumbo ("input")
* (unicast, multicast and broadcast "jumbo" frames appear to be rolled into the
one "jumbo" counter)
This can be seen another way with the 'count detail' command, correlated to "show int" output:
Nexus5548# show int eth1/29 count detailed
Ethernet1/29
Rx Packets: 6389178309 <-- input
Rx Unicast Packets: 6387682660 <-- unicast
Rx Multicast Packets: 1495485 <-- multicast
Rx Broadcast Packets: 164 <-- broadcast
Rx Jumbo Packets: 5146969 <-- jumbo
Rx Bytes: 589693485138
Rx Packets from 0 to 64 bytes: 1059418 <-- non-jumbo start
Rx Packets from 65 to 127 bytes: 6072007478 +
Rx Packets from 128 to 255 bytes: 11055520 +
Rx Packets from 256 to 511 bytes: 287107435 +
Rx Packets from 512 to 1023 bytes: 12801466 +
Rx Packets from 1024 to 1518 bytes: 23 <-- non-jumbo end
Rx Trunk Packets: 6387682823 <-- unicast + broadcast
fyi.

QoS Priority in Nexus 55xx

Hi Everyone, just a little doubt
Which traffic has more priority in a Nexus 5500 Platform. FCoE in class-fcoe (CoS=3) or CoS =5 in a strict-priority queue ?
Thanks in Advanced
My Best Regards,
Andre Lomonaco

yeah you probably want to set this up a bit differently.
you would want to use the bandwidth command in these shaped classes.
the shape command (setting PIR) operate a bit differently then the classes that have the bandwidth command set (setting cIR).
the CIR of a shape policy is 64k, so after the 64k is served, it moves over to the other classes, gets
the bw remaining assigned and then what is left is divided over the hsaped classes to the max of their PIR.
If you set the bandwidth on all classes you "reserve" that bandwidth on that class when that bw is needed.
may wanna pull cisco live form years 2013 and 2014 (orlando/sanfran) session ID 2904 for more details on QOS you may like.
regards
xander

Nexus QoS Defaults on F cards

I fond the below chart and I want to make sure I understand it correctly. Accoding to that chart my nexus 7k with F cards trust Cos by default and not DSCP. Is that correct?
our Access switches have mls qos trust dscp and our voip devices are making traffic as dscp.
Thanks
6500
N7K
ENABLE QOS
mls qos
Enabled by default
TRUST
mls qos trust [cos|dscp|ip-precedence]
DSCP (on M1 modules) and CoS (on F1 modules) trusted by default
INTERNAL QOS
QoS Label is used internally
CoS and/or DSCP passed through, though QoS-Groups can be used
COS TO DSCP MAPPING
Default of CoS to 3 most significant bits of DSCP (CoS 1 to DSCP 8 )
Same
DSCP to COS MAPPING
Default 3 most significant bits of DSCP to CoS (DSCP 10 to CoS 1)
Same
CHANGE COS/DSCP MAPPING
Modify cos-dscp or dscp-cos maps
Create and apply qos policy-map(s) ingress and/or egress

I fond the below chart and I want to make sure I understand it correctly. Accoding to that chart my nexus 7k with F cards trust Cos by default and not DSCP. Is that correct?
our Access switches have mls qos trust dscp and our voip devices are making traffic as dscp.
Thanks
6500
N7K
ENABLE QOS
mls qos
Enabled by default
TRUST
mls qos trust [cos|dscp|ip-precedence]
DSCP (on M1 modules) and CoS (on F1 modules) trusted by default
INTERNAL QOS
QoS Label is used internally
CoS and/or DSCP passed through, though QoS-Groups can be used
COS TO DSCP MAPPING
Default of CoS to 3 most significant bits of DSCP (CoS 1 to DSCP 8 )
Same
DSCP to COS MAPPING
Default 3 most significant bits of DSCP to CoS (DSCP 10 to CoS 1)
Same
CHANGE COS/DSCP MAPPING
Modify cos-dscp or dscp-cos maps
Create and apply qos policy-map(s) ingress and/or egress

Nexus 5596 and QOS config guide

Hi,
I need to implement qos on a nexus device for a client
Basically what I am trying to implement is this but on the nexus
Policy Map Enhanced_QoS_Customer_Out
      Description: Enhanced QoS customers outbound Percentages
    Class Cust_VoIP_Out
      priority 30 (%)
    Class Cust_Gold_Out
      bandwidth 30 (%)
    Class Cust_Silver_Out
      bandwidth 13 (%)
    Class Cust_Bronze_Out
      bandwidth 2 (%)
Policy Map Ethernet_QoS_Customer_Out_200Mb
    Class class-default
      Average Rate Traffic Shaping
      cir 200000000 (bps)
      service-policy Enhanced_QoS_Customer_Out
Is this possible on the nexus 5596?
I havent found much information around shaping.. Please advise if the above policy is achelievable on the nexus and if not what does the nexus support?
regards,

Hi,
I don't think the 5500 support shaping since it is mostly a layer-2 device. Here is the config guide for QOS.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/configuration/guide/cli/CLIConfigurationGuide/QoS.html
HTH

Nexus and 3850 QoS

Dear all,
I am having a problem with implementing QoS for a 3rd Party application. The vendor requests that some of this traffic needs special markings with specific cos/dscp values. Also we need to have QoS for our Cisco IP Phones.
The devices ( phones and the 3rd Party devices) are hooked up at the 3850 (running IP Base) switches which are connected via port channel to 2 Nexus 5596UP which are connected via vPC.
If i execute the
show policy-map int t1/1/4 or show policy-map int e1/1 on the switches, I can see that there are match packets ( matched by any) but 0 by the UDP ports.
Also the the 3rdParty Clocks are not synchron which is an indicator that the QoS is not working. If the two clocks are hooked up at the same 3850 switch they sync.
I am sure I miss something, but I really do not know what. The goal is to have QoS for the Cisco IP phones and also the 3rd Party devices.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Here the 3rd Party requests and configurations I did on the switches:
Protocol: PTP
Destination: 224.0.1.129
Dest.Port: UDP319,320
DSCP: CS7
CoS: 56
Protocol: Unicast Streaming
Dest.Port: UDP 14336-14600
DSCP: EF
CoS: 46
Protocol: Broadcast Streaming
Dest. Port UDP 4321
DSCP: EF
CoS: 46
I created the following Class Maps, ACLs and Policy Maps on the Nexus Switches for 3rd Party and Voice:
ip access-list ACL-Dante-Audio
10 permit udp any any eq 4321
20 permit udp any any range 14336 14600
30 permit ip any any
ip access-list ACL-Dante-PTP
10 permit udp any any eq 319
20 permit udp any any eq 320
30 permit ip any any
class-map type qos match-any VOICE
match dscp 46
match cos 5
class-map type qos match-any Dante-PTP
match access-group name ACL-Dante-PTP
class-map type qos match-any Dante-Audio-PTP
match access-group name ACL-Dante-Audio
policy-map type qos Global-QoS-IN
class Dante-PTP
set dscp 56
class Dante-Audio-PTP
set dscp 46
class VOICE
set qos-group 5
system qos
service-policy type qos input Global-QoS-IN
The following settings are configured on the 3850's:
ip access-list extended ACL-Dante-Audio
permit udp any any eq 4321
permit udp any any range 14336 14600
permit ip any any
ip access-list extended ACL-Dante-PTP
permit udp any any eq 319
permit udp any any eq 320
permit ip any any
class-map match-any Dante-PTP
match access-group name ACL-Dante-PTP
class-map match-any Dante-Audio-PTP
match access-group name ACL-Dante-Audio
class-map match-any VOICE
match dscp ef
match cos 5
policy-map Output-Qos-Policy
class Dante-PTP
set dscp cs7
class Dante-Audio-PTP
set dscp ef
class VOICE
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/4
description Uplink_Core1_e1/1
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
auto qos trust dscp
channel-group 1 mode passive
service-policy input AutoQos-4.0-Trust-Dscp-Input-Policy
service-policy output Output-Qos-Policy
ip dhcp snooping trust
interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1/4
description Uplink_Core2_e1/1
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
auto qos trust dscp
channel-group 1 mode passive
service-policy input AutoQos-4.0-Trust-Dscp-Input-Policy
service-policy output Output-Qos-Policy
ip dhcp snooping trust
Thanks in advance
Thorsten

After a few tries we found solution.
Solution is customizing cisco av pair, it must looks like:
cisco-av-pair=shell:roles*"network-admin admin"

QOS on Nexus 5500

Hi:
Can someone give me a QOS example config for my scenario below:
I have read the config guide and is confused.
Let's say I have a router leg on e1/1 of N5K1.
I want to limit on the outbound( N5K1 to router) http 25%, icmp 10K and remaining goes to default.
Any sample configurations welcome. I have already checked the ones in thc config guide.
thanks

Hello Ben,
Since you have not received a reply, I am moving this post to our data center community for greater visibility.
Thank you,
Fabienne

Vlan base Qos on Cisco Nexus 5K

Is Cisco Nexus 5596UP support vlan base Policing and traffic shaping on code NX OS version: 5.1(3)N1(1)
where i couldn't see any police command under the policy map

Hi,
Please find the below link for configuration guide for Nexus 5K.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/configuration/guide/cli/sm_snmp.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/system_management/513_n1_1/b_Cisco_n5k_system_mgmt_cg_rel_513_n1_1_chapter_01110.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/configuration/guide/cli_rel_4_0_1a/sm_snmp.pdf
Regards,
Gaurav

Nexus 7K rate-limiting QoS

All
I have 2 sets of server that replicate over a WAN link. I would like to limit the bandwidth to 10mbs for these servers only.
The servers reside on the 10.1.6.0/24 and 10.4.6.0/24 subnets
The N7K and the Cisco 6500 both connect directly to the WAN link. I’m not sure how I should accomplish this on the N7K.
Please advise.

More info
It looks like I need to create a CUSTOM QUEUE and then apply that custom queue to a specific interface. I still don't get how define a subnet for this queue. The xample given does not make sense at the moment.
example given
Create a Custom Queuing Policy
In order to create a custom queuing policy, complete these steps:
1. Create a custom queuing policy with the desired queue limit and bandwidth allocation.
2. Modify the global queuing class−maps to create the needed CoS to queue mapping.
3. Apply the new queuing policy to the appropriate interfaces.
Consider an example for M132 modules that have a 1p7q4t queuing architecture where all 8 CoS values are
mapped to a separate queue. The output shows the custom queuing policy along with the changes to the global
queuing class−maps:
policy−map type queuing 10G_POLICY
class type queuing 1p7q4t−out−pq1
priority level 1
queue−limit percent 10
class type queuing 1p7q4t−out−q2
queue−limit percent 10
bandwidth remaining percent 10
class type queuing 1p7q4t−out−q3
queue−limit percent 5
bandwidth remaining percent 5
class type queuing 1p7q4t−out−q4
queue−limit percent 5
bandwidth remaining percent 5
class type queuing 1p7q4t−out−q5
queue−limit percent 10
bandwidth remaining percent 20
class type queuing 1p7q4t−out−q6
queue−limit percent 5
bandwidth remaining percent 10
class type queuing 1p7q4t−out−q7
queue−limit percent 5
bandwidth remaining percent 10
class type queuing 1p7q4t−out−q−default
queue−limit percent 50
bandwidth remaining percent 40
! voice
class−map type queuing match−any 1p7q4t−out−pq1
match cos 5
! scavenger
class−map type queuing match−any 1p7q4t−out−q2
match cos 1
! transactional
class−map type queuing match−any 1p7q4t−out−q3
match cos 2
! call signaling
class−map type queuing match−any 1p7q4t−out−q4
match cos 3
! video
class−map type queuing match−any 1p7q4t−out−q5
match cos 4
! routing
class−map type queuing match−any 1p7q4t−out−q6
match cos 6
! management
class−map type queuing match−any 1p7q4t−out−q7
match cos 7
! best effort
class−map type queuing match−any 1p7q4t−out−q−default
match cos 0
The final step is to apply the custom queuing policy to each 1p7q4t interface:
interface Ethernet8/1
service−policy type queuing output 10G_POLICY

Problem on the QoS trust boundary on FEX

HI: all
During a test, we found the N5K attached FEX will override all the DSCP marking to 0 for the class-default traffic. Based on my understanding, the N5K will enable the qos trust on all access port by defual. But how about I configure a policy-map on the interface for DSCP marking, and want to leave the unclassified traffic as the original DSCP tag, is that possible?
Thanks!
BR
LIBING

Hi There,
Take a look at the QoS config guide, it has some of the answers you are after.
You should refer to the guide relevant to your OS version.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5500/sw/qos/602_N1_1/b_5500_QoS_Config_602N11_chapter_0110.html
Any incoming packet not tagged with an 802.1p CoS value is assigned the default untagged CoS value of zero (which maps to the default Ethernet drop system class). You can override the default untagged CoS value for an Ethernet or EtherChannel interface.
On a Cisco Nexus device, you can configure a type qos policy map and untagged CoS on the same interface.
Trust Boundaries
The trust boundary is enforced by the incoming interface as follows:
All Fibre Channel and virtual Fibre Channel interfaces are automatically classified into the FCoE system class.
By default, all Ethernet interfaces are trusted interfaces.The 802.1p CoS and DSCP are preserved unless the marking is configured. There is no default CoS to queue and DSCP to queue mapping. You can define and apply a policy to create these mappings. By default, without a user defined policy, all traffic is assigned to the default queue.
Any packet that is not tagged with an 802.1p CoS value is classified into the default drop system class. If the untagged packet is sent over a trunk, it is tagged with the default untagged CoS value, which is zero.
You can override the default untagged CoS value for an Ethernet interface or port channel.
You can override the default untagged CoS value for an Ethernet interface or a port channel interface using the untagged cos cos-value command.
You can override the default untagged Cos value for an Ethernet or a Layer 3 interface or a port channel interface using the untagged cos cos-value command.
After the system applies the untagged CoS value, QoS functions the same as for a packet that entered the system tagged with the CoS value.
Hope that helps.

Nexus 4000i in blade center H to 5548UP - no Flogi login

I have a fully integrated network in 2 separate data centers built solely on Nexus 5500UP switches that I just got finished designing and implementing. It connects FCoE to all hosts, FCoE from server access 5596UP to a pair of 5596 that act as "SAN" swtiches where I have native FC SFP that connect to XIV storage. In that environement all works great, multi-hop FCoE, NPIV, etc. All zoning and SAN administration is done fully on the N5K 5500 platform. (I even have MDS 9222i sole used for FCIP tunneling on the A and B fabric and that works like a champ too, DCNM sees both data centers as one large A and B fabric with the FCIP tunnels linking them)
The issue is when I introduced a pair of blade centers with N4K switches and a pair of 5548UP switches as their upstream FCF. The documentation isn't rocket science and yet I can't get a FLOGI login. The N7K sees the server MAC in the FIP snooping, it also sees the 5548 as it's FCF. But the 5548 vfc is stuck in "initializing". QoS is there, NXOS is upgraded, etc...I'm stumped and annoyed at this point. DCNM sees the 5548 as part of the fabric and it is a subordinated switch in the fcdomain and once I brought the switch up, all zoning, aliasing, etc was received on the switch...so I know the 5548 can see the fabric. Below are some configs (I cut out what isn't relevant)
5548UP:
Software
BIOS:      version 3.5.0
loader:    version N/A
kickstart: version 5.1(3)N1(1)
system:    version 5.1(3)N1(1)
feature npiv
feature telnet
no feature http-server
feature tacacs+
cfs eth distribute
feature interface-vlan
feature lacp
feature vpc
feature lldp
class-map type qos class-fcoe
class-map type queuing class-fcoe
match qos-group 1
class-map type queuing class-all-flood
match qos-group 2
class-map type queuing class-ip-multicast
match qos-group 2
class-map type network-qos class-fcoe
match qos-group 1
class-map type network-qos class-all-flood
match qos-group 2
class-map type network-qos class-ip-multicast
match qos-group 2
system qos
service-policy type qos input fcoe-default-in-policy
service-policy type queuing input fcoe-default-in-policy
service-policy type queuing output fcoe-default-out-policy
service-policy type network-qos fcoe-default-nq-policy
interface port-channel10
description 20Gbps Trunk to CLT-BC1-4001-PD-01 port e1/15 and 16
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 310
spanning-tree port type network
interface vfc141
bind mac-address 00:c0:dd:20:50:41
switchport description CLT-BC1 Blade #1
no shutdown
vsan database
vsan 310 interface vfc55
vsan 310 interface vfc141
interface Ethernet1/7
description Trunk to CLT-BC1-4001-PD-01 port e1/15
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 310
channel-group 10 mode active
interface Ethernet1/8
description Trunk to CLT-BC1-4001-PD-01 port e1/16
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 310
channel-group 10 mode active
CLT-SAC-5548-PD-05# show int vfc 141
vfc141 is trunking
    Bound MAC is 00:c0:dd:20:50:41
    Port description is CLT-BC1 Blade #1
    Hardware is Ethernet
    Port WWN is 20:8c:54:7f:ee:5a:d2:bf
    Admin port mode is F, trunk mode is on
    snmp link state traps are enabled
    Port mode is TF
    Port vsan is 310
    Trunk vsans (admin allowed and active) (310)
    Trunk vsans (up)                       ()
    Trunk vsans (isolated)                 ()
    Trunk vsans (initializing)             (310)
    1 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0 frames/sec
    1 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0 frames/sec
      0 frames input, 0 bytes
        0 discards, 0 errors
      0 frames output, 0 bytes
        0 discards, 0 errors
    last clearing of "show interface" counters never
    Interface last changed at Mon Mar 12 21:26:47 2012
CLT-SAC-5548-PD-05# show flogi database
No flogi sessions found.
CLT-SAC-5548-PD-05#show fcdomain
VSAN 310
The local switch is a Subordinated Switch.
Local switch run time information:
        State: Stable
        Local switch WWN:    21:36:54:7f:ee:5a:d2:81
        Running fabric name: 21:36:54:7f:ee:1c:d0:81
        Running priority: 128
        Current domain ID: 0xec(236)
Local switch configuration information:
        State: Enabled
        FCID persistence: Enabled
        Auto-reconfiguration: Disabled
        Contiguous-allocation: Disabled
        Configured fabric name: 20:01:00:05:30:00:28:df
        Optimize Mode: Disabled
        Configured priority: 128
        Configured domain ID: 0x00(0) (preferred)
Principal switch run time information:
        Running priority: 2
Interface                 Role          RCF-reject
vfc55                 Upstream         Disabled
Nexus 4000i switch
Software
BIOS:      version 1.0.37
loader:    version N/A
kickstart: version 4.1(2)E1(1h)
system:    version 4.1(2)E1(1h)
feature telnet
feature tacacs+
feature interface-vlan
feature lacp
feature fip-snooping
policy-map type queuing policy-fcoe-bandwidth
class type queuing 1p7q4t-out-q-default
    bandwidth percent 50
class type queuing 1p7q4t-out-pq1
    bandwidth percent 7
class type queuing 1p7q4t-out-q2
    bandwidth percent 7
class type queuing 1p7q4t-out-q3
    bandwidth percent 7
class type queuing 1p7q4t-out-q4
    bandwidth percent 7
class type queuing 1p7q4t-out-q5
    bandwidth percent 7
class type queuing 1p7q4t-out-q6
    bandwidth percent 7
class type queuing 1p7q4t-out-q7
    bandwidth percent 7
class-map type network-qos class-fcoe
match cos 3
class-map type network-qos class-non-fcoe
match cos 0-2,4-7
policy-map type network-qos policy-fcoe
class type network-qos class-fcoe
    pause no-drop
    mtu 2500
class type network-qos class-non-fcoe
system qos
service-policy type network-qos policy-fcoe
service-policy type queuing output policy-fcoe-bandwidth
vlan 310
fip-snooping enable
interface port-channel10
description 20Gbps Trunk to CLT-SAC-5548-PD-05 port e1/7 and 8
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 310
fip-snooping port-mode fcf
spanning-tree port type network
speed 10000
interface Ethernet1/1                 <----the server is in slot 1
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree port type edge trunk
speed auto
interface Ethernet1/15
description Trunk to CLT-SAC-5548-PD-05 port e1/7
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 310
speed 10000
channel-group 10 mode active
interface Ethernet1/16
description Trunk to CLT-SAC-5548-PD-05 port e1/8
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 310
speed 10000
channel-group 10 mode active
CLT-BC1-4001-PD-01# show fip-snooping fcf
Legend:
Interface VLAN Active FPMA/ FCMAP      FCF-MAC   Pri   Switch WWN Fabric Name
               Enodes SPMA
por10     310 0      FPMA 0x0efc00 54:7f:ee:5a 128 21:36:54:7f: 21:36:54:7f:
                                    :d2:8a            ee:5a:d2:81 ee:1c:d0:81
CLT-BC1-4001-PD-01# show fip-snooping vlan-discovery
Legend:
      Interface      VLAN          FIP MAC
       Eth1/1         1         00:c0:dd:20:50:41
Any suggestions because I'm stumped!! I'm also attaching a PDF copy of my Visio that shows port by port mapping and configuration for this blade chassis and port-channel 10.
Thanks for the help.
Chris

In the inital post where I put "
The N7K sees the server MAC in the FIP snooping, it also sees the 5548 as it's FCF. But the 5548 vfc is stuck in "initializing".
I meant to put N4K...not N7K...sorry about that.

Ask the Expert: Configuration, Design, and Troubleshooting of Cisco Nexus 1000

With Louis Watta
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about design, configuration, and troubleshooting of Cisco Nexus 1000V Series Switches operating inside VMware ESXi and Hyper-V with Cisco expert Louis Watta. Cisco Nexus 1000V Series Switches deliver highly secure, multitenant services by adding virtualization intelligence to the data center network. With Cisco Nexus 1000V Series Switches, you can have a consistent networking feature set and provisioning process all the way from the virtual machine access layer to the core of the data center network infrastructure.
This is a continuation of the live Webcast.
Louis Watta is a technical leader in the services organization for Cisco. Watta's primary background is in data center technologies: servers (UNIX, Windows, Linux), switches (MDS, Brocade), storage arrays (EMC, NetApp, HP), network switches (Cisco Catalyst and Cisco Nexus), and enterprise service hypervisors (VMware ESX, Hyper-V, KVM, XEN). As a Technical Leader in Technical Services, Louis currently supports beta and early field trials (EFTs) on new Cisco software and hardware. He has more than 15 years of experience in a wide variety of data center applications and is interested in data center technologies oriented toward data center virtualization and orchestration. Prior to Cisco, Louis was a system administrator for GTE Government Systems. He has a bachelor of science degree in computer science from North Carolina State University. .
Remember to use the rating system to let Louis know if you have received an adequate response.
Louis might not be able to answer each question because of the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Data Center community Unified Computing shortly after the event.
This event lasts through Friday, JUne 14, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.
Webcast related links:
Slides
FAQ
Webcast Video Recording

Right now there is only a few features that are not supported on N1Kv on Hyper-V
They are VXLAN and QOS Fair Weighted Queuing. We are currently demoing VXLAN functionality at Microsoft TechEd Conference this week in New Orleans. So VXLAN support should be coming soon. I can't give you a specific timeline.
For Fair Weighted Queuing I'm not sure. In the VMware world we take advantage of NETIOC infrastructure. In the MS world they do not have a NETIOC infrastructure that we can use to create a similar feature.
Code base parity (as in VMware and Hyper-V VSMs running NXOS 5.x) will happen with the next major N1KV release for ESX.
Let me know if that doesn't answer your question.
thanks
louis

Nexus 5k QoS Classifcation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for